01) dynamic and non-linear missions (not just "warp to and kill all" stuff with always the same number and type of rats, same environment, etc.)
That's what PvP is for.

02) walk in stations (wis), walk on planets (***)
They've already done some walking in stations, but it was met with huge opposition from the player base. Walking on planets sounds like the worst.

03) planets with population, you'll have to take care for, bevor you can do pi or build a station on this planet (waste management, trade, infrastructure, defense, etc.)
If you want that, you could play Banished after you've taken care of your PI. You're a capsuleer. You're not a mayor of some scrub town.

04) starmaps wich you'll have to discover or buy from other players (incl. intel, not just hitting f10 for the starmap)
Why?

05) damage models for ships
When your hull gets low, you're on fire. The idea of shield and armor is to protect the ship itself, therefore there shouldn't be much damage applied to the hull itself before you enter structure.

10) modular ships (has nothing to do with balancing!) like t3 and better
I doubt more ships would keep players in EVE for longer. After all, you have barely flown all the already existing ships.

11) a long term story, driven by ccp, on the need to respond to the player
Why have a long term story driven by CCP, when the players have made history for the past 10 years in EVE? Just look at all the stuff that happens in nullsec.

This is a idea i would like to present CCP an check if there may be followers in the eve community.

Money and time is a critical factor in game development. But as you can see in Star Citizen, the player community is willing to pay for content and development also. CCP is doing a lot, of course, and i appreciate the work they are doing. But in many ways its to slow, to focused on game balance and not on content. We also have just very little influence in using our own abilities to help creating this game and make it better.

So i suggest a crowed funded project tree for game developments, which mainly influence content and graphics (not balancing!).
Let CCP or players make some suggestions which should be the next step, vote and set a limit for funding. if its reached, the project will be implemented.

I've a whole bunch of ideas which i would like to have:

00) a nice graphical drone interface which works like the one for weapons
01) dynamic and non-linear missions (not just "warp to and kill all" stuff with always the same number and type of rats, same environment, etc.)
02) walk in stations (wis), walk on planets (***)
03) planets with population, you'll have to take care for, bevor you can do pi or build a station on this planet (waste management, trade, infrastructure, defense, etc.)
04) starmaps wich you'll have to discover or buy from other players (incl. intel, not just hitting f10 for the starmap)
05) damage models for ships
06) crowded hangars in station with more than just your own ship
07) whole new kind of mining - its just boring at the moment
08) new and dynamic asteroid belts
09) better models for weapons. they just look like glued
10) modular ships (has nothing to do with balancing!) like t3 and better ;)
11) a long term story, driven by ccp, on the need to respond to the player
12) new spaces and regions to discover
...) a lot more

Give the community the opportunity to help, to create content and let us help making eve be
Otherwise, I fear, star citizen will soon have more content, better ideas, more players and makes more fun than eve.

But as you can see in Star Citizen, the player community is willing to throw money at a guy with a track record of never delivering what he promised - let alone staying around until the end of development - and letting someone else deal with the fallout.

depends on the project. i would say up to 100Gé¼ - 200Gé¼. you think i'll get a ingame shirt for this? ;)

I already pay for content and development.

I already pay for content and development.

I already pay for content and development.

Then by all means, start a Kickstarter or other fund with your own 100-200euro right now.

Or, alternatively, and even better simply:
subscribe 1-2 additional characters for a year.

Thereby you give CCP that same amount of money directly.

Go ahead, sub 2 accounts for a year :)

thats not the same. just the current stuff twice.

the idea is simple:

1) introduce some idea's/nice to have/project (from ccp or players)
2) player vote for project
3) project is implemented after a mark in funding has been reached

nothing more.

a nice way to get some of the best ideas and wishes come true and implemented. that's not a replacement of the usual and current rebalancing and development. just a addon ;)

What a terrible idea.

The result would be utterly potentially game-destroying proposals possibly getting funded by people who don't care about the good of the game, just their own advantage, and then being implemented to "get the cash".

If you want to financially support CCPs game development, simply sub more accounts.

They've already done some walking in stations, but it was met with huge opposition from the player base.

maybe. they're starting from the scratch. eve doesn't and thats a big advantage. nevertheless its an opportunity to get money for ccp and to get more content faster for players. everybody wins. much better than trying to get money from micro-payment **** like ship colors.

@Salvos Rhoska: rtfm.

1) ccp makes the proposal (players already have made suggestions > forum; these may be considerd for this also) for the next fundrising target
2) players vote for one of two (or three)
3) result is published
4) if the current fundrising target is hit, the next project is already announced

you'll always know what you're spending your money for, ccp always has the control of all the stuff. easy solution, isn't it?

i can't see any problem with this.

yeah. of course. you're the only one with perspective.

go and have a look at: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/funding-goals. it works. and there are people who pay for something whitch even does not exist in a useable version. 40 mio dollar are enough to pay 16 developer 10 years 250k each.

Otherwise, I fear, star citizen will soon have more content, better ideas, more players and makes more fun than eve.

Everyone can pay as much as he wants for ideas he would like to have. There is no must. Thats a way to support CCP and to speed up development. If it works and perhaps if there is something you absolutely want, you'll also spend some money for implementation. We'll see ;)

I would do it in any case.

If you don't feel that what you already pay for your subscription is enough, you can buy as many PLEX as you want. If you have too many PLEX or feel guilty about accepting imaginary assets for the money that you have paid for development, you can give them to me and I promise I will put them to good use developing player-generated content for the benefit of the community.