Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Tear Jar
The Conference Elite CODE.
90
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:13:00 -
[181] - Quote
Arancar Australis wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Bing Bangboom wrote: Despite the fine efforts of so many New Order members and supporters there is still such a vast sea of misunderstanding and ignorance out there. I know a lot of it is willfully refusing to accept that we mean what we say because "principle!" and "honor!" but some of it appears to be just plain not-getting-it. I think no one will argue with the statement that there are players in Eve who believe they should be able to safely PvE in highsec without interference from other players. These players are concentrated in three areas. 1) The players who AFK autopilot between systems, mainly haulers, 2) the players who run missions in expensive, over-fitted non-PvP ships and of course 3) the max yield ice and ore miners. They often compound their stupidity by doing these activities with pods full of expensive implants chosen to maximize their ISK generation. Each of these types of players thumbs their nose at the idea that they are doing something provably stupid, despite Eve's long history of separating these foolish people from their assets. None of this would be a problem if they didn't fly to the petition page and the forums ( and the comments section of www.minerbumping.com) to demand changes to the game that would prevent them from having to take actual actions themselves to prevent another sudden but justifiable loss of their precious ISK. And THAT wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't clear that CCP has been listening to them. In what is certainly an attempt to carve out a safe space for the risk adverse (and their subscriptions) we have seen numerous changes to highsec that have been obvious concessions to the "highsec should be safe" crowd. Increased EHP built into the mining ships, massive ore holds, CONCORD response times buffed, can-flipping agro changes, and, of all things, a safety button were put in to save the carebears from themselves and their dumb activities. And so, there is the New Order of Highsec. Pushing back. Not just against the players but the people who decide the things in the previous paragraphs were good ideas. Somebody care to explain how any of those things made Eve a better game? How it matches with the dark, dangerous universe? How it isn't something Blizzard would do? We say we are against the AFKers and the bot aspirants. Its what we call people who think highsec is or should be safe. We call them bot aspirants for two reasons. One because what they do is barely different from a bot, ie a click or two every 45 minutes. Two because they WOULD bot if CCP allowed it. I know, they claim they would NEVER bot. But the truth is, if CCP put a macro function into Eve that allowed them to automate their PvE, they would use it. For many, the whole point is to make ISK while doing something else. Many miners have moved so close to being bots they are indistinguishable to the observer. And the bots hide amongst them in clear sight as no one can tell the difference. So, finally, we get to the permits. Despite the clear history of the New Order where James has told us the permits exist because CCP REQUIRED James to create a profit aspect of the Code it serves another useful purpose. It allows us Agents to tell who is with us and who is against us. Who supports us and who supports the bot aspirants. When I see a miner without a permit I recognize him as someone who supports a safe highsec, afk play and bot aspirancy. I cheerfully bump or gank said player because he is the ENEMY of this game. For his own selfish reasons, he is willing to turn Eve into a theme-park. I, for one, will hunt down people like this and drive them wailing into the wilderness. Or back to their safe on-line games. Eve is better off without them. And I am definitely not roleplaying when I say this. Highsec is worth fighting for. Bing Bangboom Agent of the New Order of Highsec Belligerent Undesirable Exactly this. I encountered someone mining just a couple days ago on my scout. While slowboating my scout toward them, I looked at their bio and saw a permit listed there. Solely because of that, I chose to gank a different miner in the same anomoly. Their permit saved them a 160m Mackinaw plus whatever their fittings were worth (probably 15m) and cost one of their rivals a Covetor (~40m fitted). This is not ISK Progressquest. And highsec is worth killing for. I would suggest to Bing that they need to take a chill pill because they are taking a game way too seriously
Its called roleplaying. We have a cause we agree with and find it fun to support said cause.
People only take it too seriously when they stop having fun. |
KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
1641
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:18:00 -
[182] - Quote
Tear Jar wrote: Its called roleplaying.
HAHA! your alliance are roleplayers! *points and laughs*
...wait ****... BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |
Kitty Bear
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Disturbed Acquaintance
1257
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:24:00 -
[183] - Quote
/me wonders if N.O members refer to James as 'Dear Leader' ?
/me also wonders if N.O members would wear this if it was available ? |
Agondray
Dark Forge Enterprise Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
91
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:30:00 -
[184] - Quote
I kill NO agents, well would if the left the dock after the first time. Then I get board and go back to whatever I choose, several gankers like to dock up or log off when I get near. Their no better than Obamacare " get health care or get fined". Well NO is " get a permit or get blown up". "Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mine" -Dr. Smith |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3268
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:33:00 -
[185] - Quote
Belt Scout wrote:Just run Proc's and Skiffs
NO working as intended *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
Alyth Nerun
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER CODE.
166
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 16:00:00 -
[186] - Quote
Kitty Bear wrote:/me wonders if N.O members refer to James as 'Dear Leader' ? /me also wonders if N.O members would wear this if it was available ? 1) It's usually "Supreme Protector" 2) I would wear it if it had the face of James 315 printed on it |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3269
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 16:02:00 -
[187] - Quote
Agondray wrote: something
Is your signature supposed to be ironic ? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
Oshia Launay
Galactic Fringe Inc
5
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 16:32:00 -
[188] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Oshia Launay wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:People watch DScan and local now far more than they did before.
You can deny it if you want, but NO is responsible for the mining community actually attempting to look after itself. I'm not sure I get what you are trying to say here. Willful ignorance is a poor thing to pretend to have. I will not answer any comments that compare a video game to a real life situation that is entirely unrelated, sorry. Fine.
See, I'm having a little trouble understanding all the self-congratulatory posts from NO members. From my perspective, NO are ganking players who can't fight back, which isn't exactly such a ground breaking idea in a MMORPG, let alone EVE Online, and as far as 'emergent gameplay' goes, amounts to nothing much, that ship has been sailing for a long long time already.
Now you and others seem to also claim that by ganking miners, you benefit them, because some of them might end up tanking their mining vessels in order to ward off ... gankers. That does not even begin to make sense, unless you're deep into twisted, self aggrandizing, circular logic. |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3270
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 16:38:00 -
[189] - Quote
Oshia Launay wrote: From my perspective, NO are ganking players who can't fight back
Why can't they fight back?
Oshia Launay wrote:Now you and others seem to also claim that by ganking miners, you benefit them, because some of them might end up tanking their mining vessels in order to ward off ... gankers. That does not even begin to make sense
Why doesnt that make sense?
You get attacked, you learn what the weaknesses in your defense were, and you tighten up
Its called defense development, or maybe even evolution.
What part of making yourself stronger to avoid or even repell or prevent being attacked doesnt make sense?
What doesnt make sense from your point of view is why, if NO dont mean what they say, do they tell you they are in system and they make their rules of engagement very clear?
Surely it would be more effecient and easier to get kills by not wearing a badge that says "I will kill you if you have a poor fit mining ship"
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
Oshia Launay
Galactic Fringe Inc
5
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 17:54:00 -
[190] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Why can't they fight back? Because the game is designed in such a way that utilitarian ships such as haulers or mining vessels are absolutely rubbish at space combat and quite useless as utilitarian ships when fully fitted with weapons and combat oriented modules. I figured that out in my first week as a new player, how long have you been playing ?
Ultimately because NO specifically targets players who are in no position to fight back. Ganking 101.
Quote:Oshia Launay wrote:Now you and others seem to also claim that by ganking miners, you benefit them, because some of them might end up tanking their mining vessels in order to ward off ... gankers. That does not even begin to make sense Why doesnt that make sense? Same reason the rapist can't be said to be of benefit to his victim, whether or not the victim choses to carry a pepper spray afterwards for future protection.
Quote:What part of making yourself stronger to avoid or even repell or prevent being attacked doesnt make sense? I feel like we have a communication problem here. I did not claim or imply any such thing.
Quote:What doesnt make sense from your point of view is why, if NO dont mean what they say, do they tell you they are in system and they make their rules of engagement very clear?
Surely it would be more effecient and easier to get kills by not wearing a badge that says "I will kill you if you have a poor fit mining ship" Efficient ganking is not a requirement for trolling, the primary purpose of NO. |
|
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
568
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 17:56:00 -
[191] - Quote
Sarah McKnobbo wrote:When were they worth anything to start with? Very good question |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3277
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 18:01:00 -
[192] - Quote
Oshia Launay wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Why can't they fight back? Because the game is designed in such a way that utilitarian ships such as haulers or mining vessels are absolutely rubbish at space combat and quite useless as utilitarian ships when fully fitted with weapons and combat oriented modules. I figured that out in my first week as a new player, how long have you been playing ? Ultimately because NO specifically targets players who are in no position to fight back. Ganking 101. Really? Thats why theres so many combat ships including T3 Strategic Cruisers regularly posted on their KBs, because they target people in no position to fight back , is it?
As for mining ships being utterly useless at combat, you have no idea what a T2 Tank fit Skiff with T2 Hobgobs can do to a Catalyst and barely take a scratch in return. You seem to have not learned very much since your first week if you think thats a soft target.
Oshia Launay wrote: Same reason the rapist can't be said to be of benefit to his victim, whether or not the victim choses to carry a pepper spray afterwards for future protection.
I told you, Im not going to compare real life to internet space ships.
Oshia Launay wrote: Efficient ganking is not a requirement for trolling, the primary purpose of NO.
In your opinion. Thats not their stated purpose, I and quite a few others dont believe thats their purpose, so Im afraid thats your opinion, and opinions are not facts, and so not a basis for debate, sorry. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
Oshia Launay
Galactic Fringe Inc
5
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 18:36:00 -
[193] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Really? Thats why theres so many combat ships including T3 Strategic Cruisers regularly posted on their KBs, because they target people in no position to fight back , is it?
As for mining ships being utterly useless at combat, you have no idea what a T2 Tank fit Skiff with T2 Hobgobs can do to a Catalyst and barely take a scratch in return. You seem to have not learned very much since your first week if you think thats a soft target. You and me both know who the targets are. Remember: "I will kill you if you have a poor fit mining ship"
Drones doing bad things to paper tanked catalysts ? I'm afraid that does not make skiffs good at space combat, that just makes paper tanked catalysts awful at taking damage. Of course New Order members know better than that and fit a proper tank on their catalysts, no doubt. Right ?
Quote:Oshia Launay wrote: Same reason the rapist can't be said to be of benefit to his victim, whether or not the victim choses to carry a pepper spray afterwards for future protection.
I told you, Im not going to compare real life to internet space ships. Oh, you can go lalala-I-can't-hear-you on me as much as you like.
Quote:Oshia Launay wrote: Efficient ganking is not a requirement for trolling, the primary purpose of NO.
In your opinion. Thats not their stated purpose, I and quite a few others dont believe thats their purpose, so Im afraid thats your opinion, and opinions are not facts, and so not a basis for debate, sorry. Trolls don't advertise they're trolling as a rule, so I guess we're done here. |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3279
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 18:43:00 -
[194] - Quote
Oshia Launay wrote: You and me both know who the targets are. Remember: "I will kill you if you have a poor fit mining ship"
So dont fly a poor fit ship and pay attention and you wont be ganked? Thats what Ive been saying so far.
Oshia Launay wrote:Drones doing bad things to paper tanked catalysts ? I'm afraid that does not make skiffs good at space combat, that just makes paper tanked catalysts awful at taking damage. Of course New Order members know better than that and fit a proper tank on their catalysts, no doubt. Right ? You can see what their Catalyst fits are, they are on www.minerbumping.com as well as on the KMs of the miners who get som HP damage on them before CONCORD does the hard work for them.
Oshia Launay wrote: Oh, you can go lalala-I-can't-hear-you on me as much as you like.
I already told you I wasnt going to compare this to real life crime, you cant blame me if you choose to bring it up again and I dont bite.
Oshia Launay wrote: Trolls don't advertise they're trolling as a rule, so I guess we're done here.
Ok, if you want. You havent rebuked any point Ive made with any kind of facts, so yes, I guess we are done here if you want to quit now.
GF *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Panhandle Industries
412
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 18:43:00 -
[195] - Quote
Agondray wrote:I kill NO agents, well would if the left the dock after the first time. Then I get board and go back to whatever I choose, several gankers like to dock up or log off when I get near. Their no better than Obamacare " get health care or get fined". Well NO is " get a permit or get blown up".
What a compliment! We do care about the health of high sec. I'm glad you are enjoying yourself in your high sec pvp activities. Of course it would be better if they were directed at other targets, but we all have to start somewhere. Thank you for advancing the New Order's cause. New player resources: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á |
Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
622
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 18:47:00 -
[196] - Quote
Oshia Launay wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Why doesnt that make sense?
Same reason the rapist can't be said to be of benefit to his victim, whether or not the victim choses to carry a pepper spray afterwards for future protection. don't make comparisons like this, you trivialise an irl issue and look like a tw@t at the same time. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|
Wulfgar WarHammer
Imperium Research Inc
57
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:00:00 -
[197] - Quote
Oshia Launay wrote:everything I said
Makes absolute, crystal clear sense. +1 to all of your posts. For someone who hasn't been here very long, your comprehension of EvE is greater than most who have been playing for years.
You also have something the majority of EvE-O forum visitors don't - Common sense and logic.
Bravo, sir.
Edit : and screw what the poster above says. They always say things like "don't cross IRL with internet spaceships" but when their best buds like Erotica 1 do so on a daily basis, well that is all acceptable and funny and considered 'creating content'. Most EvE-O forum users are bat-**** ********. |
Oshia Launay
Galactic Fringe Inc
8
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:02:00 -
[198] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Oshia Launay wrote: You and me both know who the targets are. Remember: "I will kill you if you have a poor fit mining ship"
So dont fly a poor fit ship and pay attention and you wont be ganked? Thats what Ive been saying so far. Thanks, I would never have figured out how to avoid getting ganked by the New Order without you ! I'll train mining 2 sometimes within the next two years and take the venture out for a ride to celebrate my newly found freedom. |
Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
1783
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:02:00 -
[199] - Quote
Oshia Launay wrote: See, I'm having a little trouble understanding all the self-congratulatory posts from NO members. From my perspective, NO are ganking players who can't fight back, which isn't exactly such a ground breaking idea in a MMORPG, let alone EVE Online, and as far as 'emergent gameplay' goes, amounts to nothing much, that ship has been sailing for a long long time already.
I know exactly what you mean. I lost a Celestis recently to a bunch of Goonswarm/BL gankers in Scalding Pass. I had no ability to fight back. What a bunch of wankers. Good thing 200 of my RvB Ganked fleetmates were there to give them a little revenge for me.
"You're a d-bag. But you're a caring d-bag." -- Sindel Pellion
***** Psychotic Monk and DJ FunkyBacon for CSM ***** |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3282
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:06:00 -
[200] - Quote
Oshia Launay wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Oshia Launay wrote: You and me both know who the targets are. Remember: "I will kill you if you have a poor fit mining ship"
So dont fly a poor fit ship and pay attention and you wont be ganked? Thats what Ive been saying so far. Thanks, I would never have figured out how to avoid getting ganked by the New Order without you ! I'll train mining 2 sometimes within the next two years and take the venture out for a ride to celebrate my newly found freedom.
You finally come arund to agreeing with me, and once you realise that you do see it from my point of view your response is to get snidey and act superior.
And you still wonder why the "moral majority" are the target of the NO.
Also, you do realise the NO are nothing new, right?
So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|
Wulfgar WarHammer
Imperium Research Inc
57
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:08:00 -
[201] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes?
'pretty much the life span of the game' ?
2 years. Really? Your blind fanboy love clouds your judgement. |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3282
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:10:00 -
[202] - Quote
Wulfgar WarHammer wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes? 'pretty much the life span of the game' ? 2 years. Really? Your blind fanboy love clouds your judgement.
Confirmed: Ganking for a reason invented 2 years ago
Dont be so obtuse, please
EDIT: editted for clarity *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
Jaun Pacht-Feng
University of Caille Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:10:00 -
[203] - Quote
You're a ******* idiot for buying one in the first place! -á(\_/) (O.o) (> -á<) |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1088
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:13:00 -
[204] - Quote
Wulfgar WarHammer wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes? 'pretty much the life span of the game' ? 2 years. Really? Your blind fanboy love clouds your judgement. If we're talking about individual methods, ganking specifically, then yes, this has been going on since the beginning of the game. That said, the specific elements that combine to form the NO along with their continued focus, not so much. |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3282
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:16:00 -
[205] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Wulfgar WarHammer wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes? 'pretty much the life span of the game' ? 2 years. Really? Your blind fanboy love clouds your judgement. If we're talking about individual methods, ganking specifically, then yes, this has been going on since the beginning of the game. That said, the specific elements that combine to form the NO along with their continued focus, not so much.
IEEE was pretty close, that was, what 5, 6 years ago?
Of course, these days Id half expect that the pursuit of Joe Phoenix would be called "bullying" and "sadism" *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
Wulfgar WarHammer
Imperium Research Inc
57
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:17:00 -
[206] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Also, you do realise the NO are nothing new, right?
So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes?
If you wouldn't be so blind in your fanboyism you would remember what you just posted.
e - work is over and im bailing this thread for life, anyways. No use arguing with fanatics |
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3282
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:18:00 -
[207] - Quote
Wulfgar WarHammer wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Also, you do realise the NO are nothing new, right?
So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes? If you wouldn't be so blind in your fanboyism you would remember what you just posted. e - work is over and im bailing this thread for life, anyways. No use arguing with fanatics
Or people who use facts, I see.
o/ *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
Anslo
Scope Works
4820
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:25:00 -
[208] - Quote
Naw not fanboy. Ramona see's red from a post and he just goes into a passive agressive tirade and refuses to see someone elses view point if it is an opinion. He just likes to sperg on about fact this or evidence that when he's like this. Just give him a Snickers.
|
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1088
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:25:00 -
[209] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Wulfgar WarHammer wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So you are complaining about something that has been in practice for pretty much the life span of the game without being stopped, yes? 'pretty much the life span of the game' ? 2 years. Really? Your blind fanboy love clouds your judgement. If we're talking about individual methods, ganking specifically, then yes, this has been going on since the beginning of the game. That said, the specific elements that combine to form the NO along with their continued focus, not so much. IEEE was pretty close, that was, what 5, 6 years ago? Of course, these days Id half expect that the pursuit of Joe Phoenix would be called "bullying" and "sadism" I don't think I was around for that. 2009 player and wasn't till mid 2011 that I really started to notice the greater goings on through the forums.
|
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3283
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 19:28:00 -
[210] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Naw not fanboy. Ramona see's red from a post and he just goes into a passive agressive tirade and refuses to see someone elses view point if it is an opinion. He just likes to sperg on about fact this or evidence that when he's like this. Just give him a Snickers.
Please stop calling me "him"
And I have been using evidence, being polite and being civil and having a rational debate, just as you asked
I dont know what else you want me to do? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |