EVE Search - Bring back the missile Inquisitor!!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Bring back the missile Inquisitor!!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1078	Posted - 2014.03.20 03:39:00 - [1] - Quote It was nice. Why does Amarr have 3 laser frigates anyway? There's not much point. They're all basically the same. Would be nice to have more variety in them. I say make the Tormentor into the logi frig and give the Inquisitor its EM missile damage bonus and launcher hardpoints back! Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Ashlar Vellum 24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire 107	Posted - 2014.03.20 05:22:00 - [2] - Quote No, no, no don't touch Tormentor.
Riot Girl You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack 2947	Posted - 2014.03.20 06:45:00 - [3] - Quote I'd vote for Punisher tbh. Oh god.
Little Dragon Khamez Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition 1172	Posted - 2014.03.20 08:51:00 - [4] - Quote Amarr should have at least one missile frig I think given how much the fighting styles have been mixed up by ccp. It would make for more complete game balance. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...
Rivr Luzade Coreli Corporation Ineluctable. 281	Posted - 2014.03.20 09:59:00 - [5] - Quote Riot Girl wrote: I'd vote for Punisher tbh. Keep your dirty hands of the Punisher! Amarr have 2 Missile frigates, Vengeance and Malediction. Use them.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3225	Posted - 2014.03.20 10:12:00 - [6] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: Riot Girl wrote: I'd vote for Punisher tbh. Keep your dirty hands of the Punisher! Amarr have 2 Missile frigates, Vengeance and Malediction. Use them. Idk, even Minmatar has the Breacher. Rise just felt it necessary for us to have all lasers and no options. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Seliah 0mega. 101	Posted - 2014.03.20 10:12:00 - [7] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: Amarr have 2 Missile frigates, Vengeance and Malediction. Use them. I'm pretty sure people are asking for a T1 missile frigate :)
Rivr Luzade Coreli Corporation Ineluctable. 281	Posted - 2014.03.20 10:26:00 - [8] - Quote Because Minmatar are a race that uses mixed weapons as their primary weapons, namely Missiles and Projectiles, in all their designs? Amarr, in contrast, use Lasers as their primary weapon of choice with some influx of Drones. Only the Khanid, and thus only the Khanid T2 designs, employ missiles. Use them. Or do we really need even more Kestrels and Merlins, or ships that are inferior to these two frigates just for the sake of having choice without any real meaning or purpose?
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3227	Posted - 2014.03.20 10:50:00 - [9] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: Because Minmatar are a race that uses mixed weapons as their primary weapons, namely Missiles and Projectiles, in all their designs? Amarr, in contrast, use Lasers as their primary weapon of choice with some influx of Drones. Only the Khanid, and thus only the Khanid T2 designs, employ missiles. Use them. Or do we really need even more Kestrels and Merlins, or ships that are inferior to these two frigates just for the sake of having choice without any real meaning or purpose? Ok, then we can have a droneboat T1 frigate then. Because otherwise we're the only race with just 1 choice of primary weapon systems in our T1 frigate lineup. Gallente have drones and hybrids, Caldari are split between missiles and hybrids, and Minmatar have projectiles and one missile frigate. Amarr is, once again, left out in the cold. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Rivr Luzade Coreli Corporation Ineluctable. 281	Posted - 2014.03.20 11:29:00 - [10] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Rivr Luzade wrote: Because Minmatar are a race that uses mixed weapons as their primary weapons, namely Missiles and Projectiles, in all their designs? Amarr, in contrast, use Lasers as their primary weapon of choice with some influx of Drones. Only the Khanid, and thus only the Khanid T2 designs, employ missiles. Use them. Or do we really need even more Kestrels and Merlins, or ships that are inferior to these two frigates just for the sake of having choice without any real meaning or purpose? Ok, then we can have a droneboat T1 frigate then. Because otherwise we're the only race with just 1 choice of primary weapon systems in our T1 frigate lineup. Gallente have drones and hybrids, Caldari are split between missiles and hybrids, and Minmatar have projectiles and one missile frigate. Amarr is, once again, left out in the cold. Crucifier?

Dato Koppla Elite Guards Stealth Wear Inc. 522	Posted - 2014.03.20 11:30:00 - [11] - Quote I would say droneboat, having a missile boat in the Amarr frig lineup doesn't match with the current progression, there are the laser boats (Punisher, Executioner, Coercer, Maller, Omen, Harbinger, Apoc, Baddon) and then the droneboats with both missile and turret hardpoints, which are the Arbitrator, Prophecy, Dragoon and Geddon. Sadly there isn't this type of boat at the frigate level and I think it would be really nice, it could either have the neut bonus like the Geddon and Dragoon, or the tank bonus like the Prophecy, either would be a solid boat IMO.
Lephia DeGrande Luxembourg Space Union 292	Posted - 2014.03.20 11:39:00 - [12] - Quote I hate missiles on my Amarr!! Get rid of all missiles! >.<
Electrique Wizard Mutually Lucrative Business Proposals Market and Contract PVP 336	Posted - 2014.03.20 12:13:00 - [13] - Quote Touch the tormentor and die. My vote's on the Punisher, its useless anyway. I am the Zodiac, I am the stars, You are the sorceress, my priestess of Mars, Queen of the night, swathed in satin black, Your ivory flesh upon my torture rack.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3229	Posted - 2014.03.20 12:16:00 - [14] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Rivr Luzade wrote: Because Minmatar are a race that uses mixed weapons as their primary weapons, namely Missiles and Projectiles, in all their designs? Amarr, in contrast, use Lasers as their primary weapon of choice with some influx of Drones. Only the Khanid, and thus only the Khanid T2 designs, employ missiles. Use them. Or do we really need even more Kestrels and Merlins, or ships that are inferior to these two frigates just for the sake of having choice without any real meaning or purpose? Ok, then we can have a droneboat T1 frigate then. Because otherwise we're the only race with just 1 choice of primary weapon systems in our T1 frigate lineup. Gallente have drones and hybrids, Caldari are split between missiles and hybrids, and Minmatar have projectiles and one missile frigate. Amarr is, once again, left out in the cold. Crucifier? Is an Ewar vessel without any bonused drones. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Ashlar Vellum 24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire 109	Posted - 2014.03.20 12:42:00 - [15] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Rivr Luzade wrote: Because Minmatar are a race that uses mixed weapons as their primary weapons, namely Missiles and Projectiles, in all their designs? Amarr, in contrast, use Lasers as their primary weapon of choice with some influx of Drones. Only the Khanid, and thus only the Khanid T2 designs, employ missiles. Use them. Or do we really need even more Kestrels and Merlins, or ships that are inferior to these two frigates just for the sake of having choice without any real meaning or purpose? Ok, then we can have a droneboat T1 frigate then. Because otherwise we're the only race with just 1 choice of primary weapon systems in our T1 frigate lineup. Gallente have drones and hybrids, Caldari are split between missiles and hybrids, and Minmatar have projectiles and one missile frigate. Amarr is, once again, left out in the cold. New frigate hull maybe, changing current ones is not a good idea. Every frig in amarr lineup right now has it uses, even weird and situational punisher has a few. About missile damage bonus: Gallente have no missile damage bonus hulls, why should amarr have one? one more thing. There is no amarr t1 hull with such bonus, so why all of a sudden there should be one?(I'm talking about Destroyers; Cruisers; Battlecruisers; Battleships)
Riot Girl You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack 2948	Posted - 2014.03.20 13:13:00 - [16] - Quote Drone boat with missile hard points. Oh god.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3233	Posted - 2014.03.20 13:20:00 - [17] - Quote Ashlar Vellum wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Rivr Luzade wrote: Because Minmatar are a race that uses mixed weapons as their primary weapons, namely Missiles and Projectiles, in all their designs? Amarr, in contrast, use Lasers as their primary weapon of choice with some influx of Drones. Only the Khanid, and thus only the Khanid T2 designs, employ missiles. Use them. Or do we really need even more Kestrels and Merlins, or ships that are inferior to these two frigates just for the sake of having choice without any real meaning or purpose? Ok, then we can have a droneboat T1 frigate then. Because otherwise we're the only race with just 1 choice of primary weapon systems in our T1 frigate lineup. Gallente have drones and hybrids, Caldari are split between missiles and hybrids, and Minmatar have projectiles and one missile frigate. Amarr is, once again, left out in the cold. New frigate hull maybe, changing current ones is not a good idea. Every frig in amarr lineup right now has it uses, even weird and situational punisher has a few. About missile damage bonus: Gallente have no missile damage bonus hulls, why should amarr have one? one more thing. There is no amarr t1 hull with such bonus, so why all of a sudden there should be one?(I'm talking about Destroyers; Cruisers; Battlecruisers; Battleships) Gallente get something else instead, Drones. So, like I said before. Every other race gets a secondary weapon in their T1 frigate lineup, why shouldn't Amarr get one too? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Rivr Luzade Coreli Corporation Ineluctable. 282	Posted - 2014.03.20 13:25:00 - [18] - Quote Because Amarr itself doesn't need to have other weapons than lasers? That is Amarr's philosophy. Only the Khanid divert from that because of their conditions and help from Caldari's LaiDai.
Riot Girl You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack 2949	Posted - 2014.03.20 13:30:00 - [19] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: Because Amarr itself doesn't need to have other weapons than lasers? That is Amarr's philosophy. Only the Khanid divert from that because of their conditions and help from Caldari's LaiDai. Amarr has a T1 drone boat with missile hardpoints in every subcap class except frigates. The inquisitor was formerly a missile frigate, with an EM bonus iirc. Oh god.
Rivr Luzade Coreli Corporation Ineluctable. 282	Posted - 2014.03.20 13:43:00 - [20] - Quote Yes, 2 or 1 Hardpoints for the sake of variety, but not as indication of specialization. I doubt that 1 launcher hard point on a frigate is ... helpful, even in the name of variety. As far as I remember, the Missile damage ship Inquisitor was removed in favor of the logistics role primarily because of the Venture, and secondarily because it was not uses all that much. And if I skim through the last winter's Dev post about these changes, I don't see much disagreement. So why now all of a sudden?

Arline Kley PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 273	Posted - 2014.03.20 13:48:00 - [21] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Rise just felt it necessary for us to have all lasers and no options. What Rise thinks is necessary and what is actually necessary are rarely the same (still not bitter in anyway, honest guv) A missile boat would be nice - perhaps the Crucifier, since that is the EWAR boat and does look a little... Caldari... in its appearance (aka, I can see where a missile hardpoint or two can go) Blessed are those that carry the Empress' Light; with it they destroy the shadows
Catherine Laartii Knights of Xibalba 109	Posted - 2014.03.20 15:14:00 - [22] - Quote I would agree with a few people in regards to making a drone boat. I think I would like to see them give the Crucifer drone bonuses and a bit larger sized drone bay and bandwidth, but buff the tristan by extension; i.e. give them both drone dmg and hp bonuses, but have tristan's 2nd bonus be speed and tracking or something like that. The main reason they chose to change the inquisitor into a missile boat was actually based off of the model's limitations with hardpoints with the coming introduction of launcher hardpoints on ships before they came out. It had very little to do with the actual ship performance, which was a very nice alternative to the kestrel.
Nariya Kentaya Phoenix funds 1127	Posted - 2014.03.20 15:32:00 - [23] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: It was nice. Why does Amarr have 3 laser frigates anyway? There's not much point. They're all basically the same. Would be nice to have more variety in them. I say make the Tormentor into the logi frig and give the Inquisitor its EM missile damage bonus and launcher hardpoints back! i say amarr needs less variety, we keep getting stuck with all the serious ship changes, they want us to be missile, laser, drone, neuts, EVERYTHING, other races are a whole lot better focused into 2 weapon systems, for some reason amarr is split between 4.
Ashlar Vellum 24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire 109	Posted - 2014.03.20 15:33:00 - [24] - Quote Riot Girl wrote: Drone boat with missile hard points. OP didn't suggest that. Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Gallente get something else instead, Drones. So, like I said before. Every other race gets a secondary weapon in their T1 frigate lineup, why shouldn't Amarr get one too? Drone bonus maybe, missile bonus is not needed especially if you are going to change current lineup. And if we are talking about drone bonus hull, what bonuses would you like to see?
paritybit Repo. 260	Posted - 2014.03.20 16:55:00 - [25] - Quote Everyone saying the Punisher is useless has obviously not been in a faction warfare zone. These little powerhouses can pack on four warp core stabilizers. If you muck with the Punisher you're sure to meet with threats from the FW farmer crowd. Then they'd be relegated to an Incursus or the odd Magnate.
Aglais Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 480	Posted - 2014.03.20 17:17:00 - [26] - Quote paritybit wrote: Everyone saying the Punisher is useless has obviously not been in a faction warfare zone. These little powerhouses can pack on four warp core stabilizers. If you muck with the Punisher you're sure to meet with threats from the FW farmer crowd. Then they'd be relegated to an Incursus or the odd Magnate. So... It's only viable role is 'frigate level bait'? Sounds like a synonym for 'useless'.
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1085	Posted - 2014.03.20 17:25:00 - [27] - Quote I must admit I really like the new drone/missile/laser/EWAR lineup that Amarr has lately. I love me a Swiss Army Ship. Check my bio, Ossian Boone knows it's true. With a minor exception in the Prophecy, Amarr has one of these at all sizes except for frigates. The Prophecy has drone dmg/HP and armor resists. Here's my new proposal (and I'll put it in the OP): Crucifier with Drones 2 high // 3 med // 4 low 1 turret hardpoint, 1 launcher hardpoint 20mbit/sec bandwidth // 60m3 drone bay 7.5% bonus to Tracking Disruptor effectiveness 10% bonus to Drone damage and hitpoints I moved a medium slot to low and buffed the drones to 4/12 (as opposed to 3/9 before), and I replaced one turret hardpoint with a launcher hardpoint. The reason I moved the medium slot to low was to counter with the drone buff--it reduces the EWAR output of this ship, but true to Amarrian core design philosophy, it can fit a good armor tank. Its drones are less powerful than those of the Tristan, but with its other advantages I'd say it's pretty well balanced and makes an excellent counterpart to the Tristan. What do you guys think? Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1085	Posted - 2014.03.20 17:29:00 - [28] - Quote Ashlar Vellum wrote: Riot Girl wrote: Drone boat with missile hard points. OP didn't suggest that. I did now. I've been toying with the idea and I think I've finally come to terms with it. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Liam Inkuras Aunenen Civil Liberties Union 894	Posted - 2014.03.20 18:26:00 - [29] - Quote You're such a sh*tty troll. Just stop I wear my goggles at night. Any spelling/grammatical errors come complimentary with my typing on a phone
Rivr Luzade Coreli Corporation Ineluctable. 291	Posted - 2014.03.20 19:04:00 - [30] - Quote NO taking away of mids from the Crucifier! It needs these for the EWAR. >.<

Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1086	Posted - 2014.03.20 19:14:00 - [31] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: NO taking away of mids from the Crucifier! It needs these for the EWAR. >.< Then lets make a petition to give the arbitrator some damn mids Liam Inkuras wrote: You're such a sh*tty troll. Just stop That would hurt my ego if I had any left. These forums full of badposters calling troll on good posts ruined it for me. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Rivr Luzade Coreli Corporation Ineluctable. 291	Posted - 2014.03.20 19:25:00 - [32] - Quote Sure thing. 1 more mid in exchange for a useless high slot would be good.
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1331	Posted - 2014.05.11 05:30:00 - [33] - Quote Bump for drone crucifier! Alternate setup (less drone, more swiss army ship): 4 high slots, 2 turret hardpoints, 2 launcher hardpoints 10mbit/sec bandwidth, 50m3 drone bay (lots of backup options) 3 mid slots, 3 low slots 7.5% to tracking disruptor effectiveness per level 15% to energy vampire and energy neutralizer transfer amount per level Benefits of this design: With 4 high slots, it can do capacitor warfare and have space left over for guns. When you combine missiles, drones, and turrets, the ship has enough DPS to get by without a damage bonus. 3/3 slot setup allows it to fit a decent armor tank (damage control, armor plate, EANM or nanofiber) with decent EWAR (prop mod, 2 tracking disruptors) Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Grunnax Aurelius The Horny Heron's Horny Empire 281	Posted - 2014.05.11 05:53:00 - [34] - Quote Ok simple fix here, As you know all of the Amarr Drone boats have no weapon bonus, only drone bonus, but have the same amount of launcher and turret hardpoints. Ok so here it is: CRUCIFIER Amarr Frigate Bonus: 7.5% bonus to Tracking Disruptor effectiveness per level 10% bonus to Tracking Disruptor optimal range per level Role Bonus: 60% bonus to Drone Damage and Hitpoints (4.8 effective drones) Slot layout: 3H, 4M, 3L; 2 turrets, 2 launchers (+2) Fittings: 30 PWG(+3, 240 CPU(+5) Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 250 / 400 / 350 Capacitor (amount / recharge / cap per second) : 330 / 180000 / 1.83 Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass): 350 / 3.35 / 1064000 Drones (bandwidth / bay): 15 / 45 Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 65km / 540 / 6 Sensor strength: 14 Signature radius: 38 Problem solved. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=342042&find=unread
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1331	Posted - 2014.05.11 06:03:00 - [35] - Quote But that would make the crucifier basically as powerful as a tristan and a maulus at the same time. How is that not overpowered? Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Abs Sciuto Diesel Corporation Intercom. 3	Posted - 2014.05.11 06:21:00 - [36] - Quote my vision of amarr frigates: crucifier needs only one thing +5 mbit and m3 of drones. it will be like sentinel drones and it will be enough. okay, you can add 2 launcher hardpoints to make it similar to prophecy punisher needs some care, because all of amarr frigs are laser without any difference. but people on tormentors whine loudly) inquisitor needs bonus to fit only one warfare link without any benefits. anyway right now logistic frigates are useless) launcher hardpoints and missile bonuses may be interesting, to make something missile and armortanked btw minmatar frigates are rare too
w3ak3stl1nk Hedion University Amarr Empire 6	Posted - 2014.05.15 03:49:00 - [37] - Quote Crucifier with 25 bandwidth and no drone bonus would still be very cool ship.
Ines Tegator Towels R Us 445	Posted - 2014.05.15 04:18:00 - [38] - Quote +1 for the Cruci. I've tried to make a cheap sentinel out of it so many times but it doesn't have the fitting for it. A few suggestions: -TD's have an obnoxiously large range already. The range bonus can easily be replaced with a drone bonus. -I'd rather see fitting increased(a mere 10 more PG would be amazing. 15 would unlock so many fits I'd have an Amarrgasm) and 4 unbonused light drones, to match the Sentinel. Since it's such a strong ewar ship already, it doesn't need to be a combat powerhouse as well. -DONT YOU DARE touch my four midslots. It's an ewar ship, dammit. Regarding the Punisher: I love my little Puni. It and I have a lot of history together. Unfortunately in today's game it sucks. If CCP pulls their Neutralizer out of their Energy Egress Port and gives small NOS/Neuts the same range as Scrams, then the Puni could be good. Without that, go ahead and make it the missile ship. I miss the rocket Inquisitor as well and was very sad to see it become logi (which, by rights, should have gone to the tormentor because it used to be the mining ship), but I'd rather have a mini-vengeance then the outclassed-in-every-role-except-bait Punisher of today. - Mission Overhaul - Bridging the PVP / PVE Gap - -áIf the game stops teaching people to fear lowsec, maybe people will start going there?
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1336	Posted - 2014.05.15 04:43:00 - [39] - Quote A lot of you have been bothered by my constantly suggesting reducing the mid slots on the Crucifier. I'd like to take a moment to confess the main reason I have suggested it was to get you guys riled up. It seems to have worked. But I also think it's not a terrible idea. 3 mid slots allows for two tracking disruptors and a strong armor tank in the 4 lows. And if there was a low-slot tracking disruptor boost module (which there should be), then you could put that on if you don't want all that tank. You would have the power, in one frigate, to pretty much prevent two other ships from being able to hit anything with turrets. But in all seriousness, I'd actually go for keeping the slot setup the way it is. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Ines Tegator Towels R Us 446	Posted - 2014.05.15 08:43:00 - [40] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: It seems to have worked. 4 mid slots are needed to fit a Prop, TD, point and web for a solo fit. Alternately, prop, point and 2x TD for a fleet fit. 3 slots just doesn't allow the ship to use it's biggest strength. - Mission Overhaul - Bridging the PVP / PVE Gap - -áIf the game stops teaching people to fear lowsec, maybe people will start going there?

w3ak3stl1nk Hedion University Amarr Empire 9	Posted - 2014.05.15 20:18:00 - [41] - Quote Or inquisitor with 25 bandwidth and no drone bonus? Could be more logistics, but can be a surprise 5 scout drones.... maybe...
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1339	Posted - 2014.05.15 22:13:00 - [42] - Quote w3ak3stl1nk wrote: Or inquisitor with 25 bandwidth and no drone bonus? Could be more logistics, but can be a surprise 5 scout drones.... maybe... Howabout one bonus to EM missiles and the other to repair drones? Could throw in a role bonus to remote armor repairer range just to keep it competitive with other logi frigates. With scout drones plus mjolnir rockets, it'll get pretty nice DPS for a frigate. Alternatively, with armor repair drones combined with remote armor reps, it'll be able to repair effectively. The beauty of it is the enemies don't know which one it is. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.