|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
11355
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 11:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Buck Futz wrote:And, now, having read the actual blog.... I'm quite convinced that Ripard is the intolerable sort that whines to the coach when he gets hazed by his team-members in the men's locker room.
Of course this is theoretical. Because it would require Ripard actually setting foot in a men's locker room for something other than pilates or yoga. You know, something that doesn't require stretchy see-through pants. And this is exactly this kind of replies that doesn't push the world and community towards a better place.
But hey it's easier being a douche than being nice to people...
/c
|
|
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
11369
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 13:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Buck Futz wrote:Chribba wrote:Buck Futz wrote:And, now, having read the actual blog.... I'm quite convinced that Ripard is the intolerable sort that whines to the coach when he gets hazed by his team-members in the men's locker room.
Of course this is theoretical. Because it would require Ripard actually setting foot in a men's locker room for something other than pilates or yoga. You know, something that doesn't require stretchy see-through pants. And this is exactly this kind of replies that doesn't push the world and community towards a better place. But hey it's easier being a douche than being nice to people... /c I guess in /c's world, douchbag-ism is only reserved for people who 'aren't like him'. Actually I was calling you out for being derogatory towards Ripard - which has absolutely nothing to do with "nothing like me" part. It's the example of why you did not criticize the post rather than saying there's something wrong with a guy doing yoga or pilates - because those have lots to do with the discussion at hand right?
/c
|
|
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
11448
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:Something that I always wonder about such threadnaughts, is how much of it is a small handful of very prolific posters driving the post count, compared to number of posters having an opinion.
Say the mods are following the thread, there is little way one person can keep track; I do wonder if they have tools to "deconstruct" the thread and get a feel for how many people are really talking. Just as an example, imagine if the mods could pull out all Kaarous and Salvos posts (no offense guys, you are just good examples), and see how many pages the thread drops by just from those two poster alone. http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/332182-1
/c
|
|
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
11453
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: When did the world decide to create pansies out of everyone?
With this new term 'cyber bullying' being thrown around, I really am shaking my head here. When I was young(tm), people dealt with 'bullies' as a normal part of coming of age, on their own. People dealt with all life challenges in fact, without having to codify it with a marketing term to convert individual fail into victimization...
You want to know why some young people are killing themselves due to 'bullying'?
It's because they were fricken bubble wrapped since birth and grew up without having to develop any adversity management skills, so when the first 'big' challenge did come their way their brains exploded. ****, Johnny didn't invite me to the dance, I will slit my wrists in the tub...
Now I am not talking about putting all kids in the Agoge of Sparta, but what I am asking is aren't these well-intentioned idiots who coin pansification terms like 'cyber bullying' just making more life-neutered pussies?
tldr; HTFU
One difference between your young(tm) type bullying and current online(tm) type bullying, is that it's way way way harder to actually do something about it. Classic face to face bullying, you could try fight back by punching some sense into someone. It's much harder to smack someone in the face when they're anonymous behind a screen in a different country and can keep on doing stuff. So I wouldn't call it fair to compare the two types as if they were equal. But I fully understand your point.
/c
|
|
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
11462
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 14:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Chribba wrote: One difference between your young(tm) type bullying and current online(tm) type bullying, is that it's way way way harder to actually do something about it. Classic face to face bullying, you could try fight back by punching some sense into someone. It's much harder to smack someone in the face when they're anonymous behind a screen in a different country and can keep on doing stuff. So I wouldn't call it fair to compare the two types as if they were equal. But I fully understand your point.
That is definitely a particularly insidious aspect of cyberbullying, however if you want to call what's happening in the bonus room "cyberbullying," then that aspect is not at play in this situation, because as far as we know, erotica1 does not harass "clients" after the bonus round has ended. You are correct, my post was meant in a more general way of online harassment we see today (on various places around the web), since the means to combat online harassment is far different from face-to-face.
|
|
|
|
|