Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
964
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 02:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:
Fortunately, all clients are asked if they... consent... to being recorded. And they do.
News flash consent to being recorded and consent to being broadcast are two vastly different things. Without a proper waiver the broadcasting of the recorded conversation can open you up to liability. So in the future when recording someone make sure you state 'This recording may be used for training purposes' that covers both recording and broadcasting waivers.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
964
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 02:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
I would think E1 would be more concerned with winning CSM than anything else, disclosing who he is and by extension where he lives might not be the brightest idea at this point and time.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
965
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Its a huge legal liability for CCP too, because who knows what could potentially culminate out of this degree of OUT OF GAME abuse of other players, including someone getting physically hurt or at worst some nut showing up to a Fanfest with a home-made pipebomb.
I can imagine the news report. "Disgruntled EVE player visits violence upon innocent fangoers after being scammed out of virtual assets which he did not legally own." Your kidding right? Colorado, not long ago? A guy killing Batman movie goers because he was emulating the Joker. How would this be much different?
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
968
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
I guess this could be the natural evolution of EVE, the scammers safely docked up and immune to true EVE retribution are finally getting called to the carpet, and they are not happy. There is no deadspace or officer tank that can protect them from this court of public opinion, and the jury is angry, it sure looks like they are about to get ganked.
Time to make more popcorn.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
968
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
You know Ero 1 could have used a valuable lesson from the Mittani, simply apologized before it turned in to a 92 page threadnaught and the whole thing would have been forgotten and fallen to page two of GD within the hour; But true to EVE form, defences, justifications and HTFU have slaughtered any chance of a tactical retreat.
Yeah we are looking at Seppuku as possibly the only safe way out now , but no worries you can make a new alt and be back in business in a few weeks.
Well you could have.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
968
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 04:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Goldiiee wrote:You know Ero 1 could have used a valuable lesson from the Mittani, simply apologized before it turned in to a 92 page threadnaught and the whole thing would have been forgotten and fallen to page two of GD within the hour; But true to EVE form, defences, justifications and HTFU have slaughtered any chance of a tactical retreat.
Yeah we are looking at Seppuku as possibly the only safe way out now , but no worries you can make a new alt and be back in business in a few weeks.
Well you could have.
Seppuku is literally ritual sucide. You're suggesting he kill himself. And you even manage to mention Mittens in the same breath. This thread delivers. OOPS damn, I don't suppose a retraction would do? I guess I need a very sharp bottle opener (Ran out of pop corn only beer left).
   
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
969
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:
I don't think CCP cares about losing one unknown player. They're not going to permanently remove a content creator over it.
I would beg to differ if the 'Content Creator' is repeatedly causing 'one unknown player' to quit, bad reviews from that one player can become bad reviews from many players, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press. The true number of lost revenue is subjective, but evident nonetheless. As a company owner is (Should be) concerned about every customer not just the loud ones.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
970
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Goldiiee wrote:Xuixien wrote:
I don't think CCP cares about losing one unknown player. They're not going to permanently remove a content creator over it.
I would beg to differ if the 'Content Creator' is repeatedly causing 'one unknown player' to quit, bad reviews from that one player can become bad reviews from many players, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press. The true number of lost revenue is subjective, but evident nonetheless. As a company owner is (Should be) concerned about every customer not just the loud ones. What about all the players who stick around because of E1s content? I would not want to guess at the number of either, but would the ones that enjoy E1's 'Content' leave if it wasn't there? or would they find new 'Content' to enjoy? Or more importantly would it be possible to have both inexperienced players and 'Content' that didn't drive them away, or prevent them form ever trying EVE in the first place.
If this particular scam was discouraged, or vacated from EVE entirely would E1 quit?
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
970
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:
You honestly think CCP cares about a few subs from nobodies?
EVE gains more subs each year than it loses.
You think they care? Honestly?
I can only judge from my own experience, I care about every customer I have ever got, and I am always equally concerned about the ones I get vs. the ones I lose, since it is 40 times harder to get a new customer than it is to lose one, but a lost customer is likely to lose you 10 more new ones through bad reference.
I would think a like minded business man would know and do the same to protect their clientele.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |
|
|