Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 12:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:The stupidity of some people... I'ts almost enough to inspire sympathy. Almost.
But yeah I agree, seize Erotica1's assets and ban the accounts, just to hear HIM rage and cry. Hell, I'd pay money for such a delicious recording. Also, Erotica1 sounds bent.
I would pay actual $ for that. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 12:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
To scam people. It is a major part of the game. And it is fine.
But to act like a sociopath behind the safety of a computer screen? Not cool, and it gives EvE a horrible name in the eyes of non-players.
Frankly, I wouldn't want to be apart of a community like that. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 12:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
First we have Mittani encouraging people to get some miner to commit suicide on a microphone at fanfest.
Then we have sadistic perverts abusing others over computers.
Why is this **** tolerated??? |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Yes, you're absolutely right, the abuse, death threats and racism that Sokhar used on Ero should not be tolerated. The abuse, death threats, wishes of disease in real life and racism of no one should be tolerated. They occur on a daily basis in local chat, private conversations and evemails.
Get over yourself.
A single death threat or wish of disease in a chat room is not the same as a person who devotes his entire gaming time to tricking naive noobs just so he can get off on their misery.
I agree it is silly to be so upset over something like ISK, but that doesn't excuse the person whos only goal is to cause that kind of reaction in as many people as possible. Not only is it just wrong, it drives people away from the game and gives every other EvE player a bad name. It hurts the community.
You know it isn't even about the ISK, because he conversation goes long after the assets are stolen. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/
Just read the comments on this article.
I now feel like if I tell anybody I play EvE, they will think I'm some kind of sadistic sociopath.
This is not the kind of attention EvE should be getting. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
25
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Chribba wrote:Aralyn Cormallen wrote:Something that I always wonder about such threadnaughts, is how much of it is a small handful of very prolific posters driving the post count, compared to number of posters having an opinion.
Say the mods are following the thread, there is little way one person can keep track; I do wonder if they have tools to "deconstruct" the thread and get a feel for how many people are really talking. Just as an example, imagine if the mods could pull out all Kaarous and Salvos posts (no offense guys, you are just good examples), and see how many pages the thread drops by just from those two poster alone. http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/332182-1/c Priceless! A ban zealot is on top with 163 posts (6%) on an issue that has absolutely nothing to do with him.
What does that prove?
This is our gaming community, it is now everyone's business. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
25
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
Just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean it is okay.
But I'm pretty sure Cyberbullying is illegal. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
25
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Get over yourself. So you think it was right to call out Sokhur for his reaction (because that's what my response related to)? Sorry, but I don't see how what he did was any different to what happens on a daily basis and none of it really belongs in interaction between adults in a game.
None of it belongs.
But you need to look at who started the fire and kept adding fuel to it.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:No, there is not. Exactly as I expected. The clear reason being that you never actually linked any criminal codes as you claimed. If you did, they would be there and they aren't that I have been able to find. That whole aspect of this thread based around certainty that a judge and jury would rule against Eortica 1 was based on complete fantasy it seems. There was never any actual legal basis for making those claims and your claim that you linked the criminal codes was false.
Shut up about real life laws to try to justify the actions of degenerates.
CCP is the law and its customers are the voters.
If the majority of the players and nonplayers think this behavior is unacceptable, your argument is next to worthless.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
Delt0r Garsk wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:
If the majority of the players and nonplayers think this behavior is unacceptable, your argument is next to worthless.
The majority of eve players have hardly even heard of the forums let along this latest Erotica thing. They just don't care because its just not all that important.
This 137 page thread and multiple news articles disagree. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 13:50:00 -
[11] - Quote
Everybody needs to stop assuming that the victims are perfectly healthy minded individuals.
"You deserve it if you fall for THAT scam."
"He could of left whenever he wanted!"
You have no idea who that person is, or what their life is right now.
He could be impaired someway mentally or not in the right state of mind. Does that make it right to abuse them for personal pleasure? |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 14:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: When did the world decide to create pansies out of everyone?
With this new term 'cyber bullying' being thrown around, I really am shaking my head here. When I was young(tm), people dealt with 'bullies' as a normal part of coming of age, on their own. People dealt with all life challenges in fact, without having to codify it with a marketing term to convert individual fail into victimization...
You want to know why some young people are killing themselves due to 'bullying'?
It's because they were fricken bubble wrapped since birth and grew up without having to develop any adversity management skills, so when the first 'big' challenge did come their way their brains exploded. ****, Johnny didn't invite me to the dance, I will slit my wrists in the tub...
Now I am not talking about putting all kids in the Agoge of Sparta, but what I am asking is aren't these well-intentioned idiots who coin pansification terms like 'cyber bullying' just making more life-neutered pussies?
tldr; HTFU
Here is the message your post is giving:
"People dealt with bullies for a long time so its okay."
"People with emotional issues are just pussies and need to HTFU."
"If a person commits suicide because they were bubble wrapped as a kid."
Are you okay in the head? All I see is victim blaming trying to justify the actions of some sad and pathetic individuals.
So it is their fault that a person is the victim of abuse, but the person giving the abuse has no fault whatsoever?
This is the most irrational post I've ever seen. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
31
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 14:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
Clara Pond wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:You have no idea who that person is, or what their life is right now. He could be impaired someway mentally or not in the right state of mind. Does that make it right to abuse them for personal pleasure? Quite right, you have no idea of these things in an MMO. They are a capsuleer name, an alliance ticker, a shiptype. They are a mark, a target. The person you undercut with your market trade may have been on their last ISK and suffering manic depression. Who knows what your callous undercut could trigger? You argue that people are responsible for the jilted lover screaming "if you don't take me back I'll kill myself". People are not responsible for the reactions of others. If you want to argue for compassion, I'm right behind you. But that is a different thing. Some people just don't have the intellectual or emotional maturity to interact with other humans in a competitive environment and the rest of us are not responsible for their reactions. Look at the login screen: Online Interactions Not Rated By The ESRB.
Have you even listened to the 2 hour long recording?
How are you going to compare that to .01 isk wars on the market and ingame PVP?
That is ridiculous. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
31
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 14:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
Asia Leigh wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Everybody needs to stop assuming that the victims are perfectly healthy minded individuals.
"You deserve it if you fall for THAT scam."
"He could of left whenever he wanted!"
You have no idea who that person is, or what their life is right now.
He could be impaired someway mentally or not in the right state of mind. Does that make it right to abuse them for personal pleasure? absolutely not But lets be serious here. EVE isn't exactly WoW when it comes to the learning curve of the game. I really think that someone who was impaired enough to not have any idea what is going on around him would have an extremely hard time picking this game up, and would likely leave it out of frustration. Also he claims to be an air traffic controller... Not a job you get if your mentally deficient. Lets face it, he got greedy, gambled and lost. That simple. Does that make it right for erotica to treat a person in this matter regardless of circumstance? Absolutely not!!! Just dont expect anything to happen as this happened a while ago and was known to both CCP and the community long before this blog post or this thread.
You are still thinking that we are arguing that the scam is the problem here.
Nobody cares that he got scammed, it happens everyday and is apart of the game.
And saying that "EvE isn't WoW" is only an argument towards the scam, not the 2 hours of abuse.
And if you ask me, the victim didn't sound like a normal person. To me it was obvious they were just abusing either an impaired individual or something who was going through a really bad time in their life. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
31
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 14:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Clara Pond wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Have you even listened to the 2 hour long recording? How are you going to compare that to .01 isk wars on the market and ingame PVP? Yes, I'm apparently one of the few who has. And you are cherry picking mock-outraged soundbites in order to excuse yourself from understanding analogy.
You made a really bad analogy, your post was bad too.
Do a better job on expressing your ideas.
Or leme guess, it is the readers fault that your posts are bad and make no sense. Same way its the victims fault that he got abused?
Right?  |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
36
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:37:00 -
[16] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:Some of you should realize how close you are to a forum ban and stop name calling (retards, moralfags, etc.) Aside from being childish it diminishes the impact of your opinion.
Don't impersonate forum moderators. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
36
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:PinkPanter wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:And yet, it has been done to devs. Hey I read somebody went on and killed 20 kids in some school. I mean it's been done already. What are you waiting for? Are you trolling or actually this stupid? Genuine question.
Hes making a point, you are too stupid to understand that and probably take his post litterally. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
39
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions "
^ No scum behavior wanted.
Could seriously care less about the legal systems you guys keep bringing up. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
39
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " "CCP, you should ban this person because I do not like them despite the fact that they have done nothing against the rules"
"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.
Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't? |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
39
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:49:00 -
[20] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " So you are literally saying "CCP should ban anyone I don't like". You realise that ends with everyone banned right?
You are litterally strawmanning the **** out of his statement.
Fallacy central right here. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
39
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.
Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't? You just managed to miss the sole purpose of all explicitly stated rules everywhere in all of the past, present and future. Kudos.
Oh sod off.
Have you seen the EvE Eula? It is so vague you can find a way to do practically ANYTHING and say it isn't against the rules. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
39
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:53:00 -
[22] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:baltec1 wrote:Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " "CCP, you should ban this person because I do not like them despite the fact that they have done nothing against the rules" "Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things. Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't? That is literally how a game works.
I'm pretty sure this game is suppose to work as a game.
Not as a platform for sad bullies to find targets, pull them out of said game and harrass them. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
40
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:56:00 -
[23] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:baltec1 wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:
"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.
Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't?
This is a game at advertises than you will be scammed, robbed, stabbed in the back and killed again. CCP are not going to ban people because your feelings got hurt. Then lets play the recording over speakers at the next Fanfest at the unveiling of the Monument, as a shining testament to that. It is, afterall, what is advertised, as you say.
Then everybody will know what kind of sick perverted community we are! Great idea.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
40
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " So you are literally saying "CCP should ban anyone I don't like". You realise that ends with everyone banned right? You are litterally strawmanning the **** out of his statement. Fallacy central here. "I would like to think that when a person I don't like boasts publicly about being a person I don't like, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "I don't like this, this will not be accepted by me and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " 'We' turns into 'I' since he can only speak for himself. Judgements about E1's status as the 'scum of the planet' are personal opinion and thus can be generalised as above. The result it literally "CCP should ban anyone I don't like".
You are trying to rationalize a logical fallacy.
LOL |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
40
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.
Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't? You just managed to miss the sole purpose of all explicitly stated rules everywhere in all of the past, present and future. Kudos. Oh sod off. Have you seen the EvE Eula? It is so vague you can find a way to do practically ANYTHING and say it isn't against the rules. No, it's not that vague. It's quite specific, actually. Tell me, you go from telling us that the rules should take second seat to our better judgement to implying that the rules need to be more specific. How did you even learn to work your keyboard?
Wrong.
And nice insult. Can't argue without it? Lol. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
40
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:02:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:baltec1 wrote:Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " "CCP, you should ban this person because I do not like them despite the fact that they have done nothing against the rules" "Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things. Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't? It's not a matter of whether Erotica 1's actions are right or wrong. It's a matter of how "ban people I don't like" can be turned against anyone, including you. Unless someone can present an argument that defines a legitimate reason to ban Erotica 1 that doesn't also adversely affect other players, nothing can be done about it.
It isn't "ban players that I don't like".
It is "ban players whos only purpose is to glorify bullying others".
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
40
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:05:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Giovanni erkelens2 wrote:Moloney wrote:I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.
The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.
We would like to play Eve.
We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions " this. my sir. this is what i wnat to hear. theres hope. Hope for tyranny and injustice. Because that's what you people are asking for. The existence of the witch hunt crowd should scare everyone here. Look at all these people willing to totally ignore rules, laws, important values of fairness and due process ect ect just to get at someone they don't like. We've literally fought terrible wars against people who thought like this. Documents like the Magna Carta and the U.S. Constitution exist to stamp out arbitrary use of power (such as 'I don't like you, so now you get to go away'). But there are still plenty of people who think these vile ideas are valid when in fact it's these vile ideas are the true evil and people like E1 are just the side affect and consequence of our freedoms.
LOL, way to dramatize everything way out of proportion. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
42
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:You are trying to rationalize a logical fallacy.
LOL If you don't have an actual response I can't really follow up, so I guess we're done.
Can't reason with somebody who doesn't understand reason.
Cya. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
42
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:11:00 -
[29] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Not wrong.
What? It works for you to just state 'wrong' without clarifying. I can play 5th grade "you're wrong and I'm right" as well as the next person.
Here's a real challenge for you though.
You say I'm wrong.
Prove it.
For the record, my arguments have been presented both with and without observations made of the person arguing with me. Or, what you call 'insults'. You can ignore the arguments and focus on your hurt feelings all you like, but that would be...
wait for it....
a logical fallacy.
You love pointing out logical fallacies, don't you.
The EULA is vague, there is nothing more to it.
EULAs are suppose to be vague so CCP can enforce anything and get away with anything else.
Having it be too specific will be a determent to them in case of unforseen circumstances, a vague EULA will give you alot of flexibility.
Not only is it common sense, it is also good business practice. I thought it was pretty obvious, guess not for some of you. 
So again, you are wrong.... And I'm right. You here to speak reason or just attempt to make good sounding posts that have no real value? |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
42
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:13:00 -
[30] - Quote
lollerwaffle wrote:
glorifying bullying others isn't against the rules though.
"I don't like people glorifying bullying" "Ban players whose only purpose is to glorify bullying others"
ergo
"Ban players that I don't like"
To say otherwise would be to infer that you like people who glorify bullying.
Plato is rolling in his grave. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
42
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:just to get at someone they don't like. Strawman. This is about his conduct, not him personally. No, this is ABSOLUTELY about him personally and has been since before this thread existed. People here weren't born yesterday. If this wasn't just about Ero, and about 'activities', then Sokhar would be copping it as well. You have lied, demonstrably and repeatedly, throughout this thread. I've said it before and I'll say it again - I definitely believe you when you claim to be a lawyer. But you're not a very good one.
Do you have any evidence to back up those "facts"?
Personally I never knew the guy to be more than just a jita scammer before I heard the recordings. Got no problem with scamming, got a problem with internet bullies though. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
43
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:16:00 -
[32] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:You are trying to rationalize a logical fallacy.
LOL If you don't have an actual response I can't really follow up, so I guess we're done. Can't reason with somebody who doesn't understand reason. Cya. You took the words right out of my mouth. That must be why you're impossible to reason with and why he's done with you.
If by "reason" you mean strawmanning and insulting every opposing viewpoints... then yeah.. You can't "reason" with me. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
43
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:19:00 -
[33] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:just to get at someone they don't like. Strawman. This is about his conduct, not him personally. No, this is ABSOLUTELY about him personally and has been since before this thread existed. People here weren't born yesterday. If this wasn't just about Ero, and about 'activities', then Sokhar would be copping it as well. You have lied, demonstrably and repeatedly, throughout this thread. I've said it before and I'll say it again - I definitely believe you when you claim to be a lawyer. But you're not a very good one. Do you have any evidence to back up those "facts"? Personally I never knew the guy to be more than just a jita scammer before I heard the recordings. Got no problem with scamming, got a problem with internet bullies though. Ok, lets go there. What is your problem with "internet bullies"? Which btw is a stupid term as I don't see how you bully someone over something you can turn off at will. but anyways, please tell us how internet bullies are the scourge of the universe, then tell us where they touched you,
You can just walk away from verbal harrassment IRL.
Does that make it any less? |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
46
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:26:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Ok, lets go there.
What is your problem with "internet bullies"? Which btw is a stupid term as I don't see how you bully someone over something you can turn off at will.
but anyways, please tell us how internet bullies are the scourge of the universe, then tell us where they touched you,
You can just walk away from verbal harrassment IRL. Does that make it any less? People verbally harassing you IRL can follow you.
Obviously the whole point of E1s scam is to keep people in the TS and lead them on a string in the hopes they will get their stuff back. Just so him and his creepy friends can make fun of the victim.
Otherwise why would they stay in a TS and be bullied?
It is such a sad and pathetic thing to do , and I'm shocked so many people are defending it.
One could argue it isn't even about the ISK and more about the harrassment, which CCP does not like. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
46
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:27:00 -
[35] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Danalee wrote: Wait, are you trying to lure people out of the game by ingame means to hurt their feelings? BULLY!
I am not. But thanks for confirming by exclusion that is infact what Erotica1 is doing. Irony is badly spent on you. Noted. I'm gonna post this every time someone beats the poor dead horse; What happend;Ero: Give me your isk and I double it. Adult ATC: Here's all my isk Ero: haha, you need to come on teamspeak and win a bonus round where I invent the rules as we go Adult ATC: ok Ero: read this text please Adult ATC: Ok, N-BOMB, Gaybash, shout, scream, rant Ero: Sing songs Adult ATC: NO! N-BOMB, Gaybash, shout, scream, rant Adult ATC: I'l gonna kill you! Adult ATC: My wife will come and scream at you some more How it should have been;Ero: Give me your isk and I double it. Adult ATC: Here's all my isk Ero: haha, you need to come on teamspeak and win a bonus round where I invent the rules as we go Adult ATC: Wait what? Naaaah... You scammed me, well played. What normal people do:Ero: Give me your isk and I double it. Adult ATC: No way dude, I know it's just pixels but I want to buy space bling with them. D. 
So you are going to spam the thread?
Mature. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
46
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:30:00 -
[36] - Quote
lollerwaffle wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:lollerwaffle wrote:
glorifying bullying others isn't against the rules though.
"I don't like people glorifying bullying" "Ban players whose only purpose is to glorify bullying others"
ergo
"Ban players that I don't like"
To say otherwise would be to infer that you like people who glorify bullying.
Plato is rolling in his grave. Your style of throwing out snarky comments instead of presenting arguments in a coherent manner must win you a lot of debates. Carry on.
There is no reason to argue with people that have no sense of reasoning or logic.
You litterally strawman a post that called you out on strawmanning a previous post.
So don't act like you are the one walking away, you aren't.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
46
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:32:00 -
[37] - Quote
Danalee wrote:LordOfDespair wrote: So you are going to spam the thread?
Mature.
At least I'm providing content, facts and things everyone should know already. Whereas you and yours are just out for a good hanging facts and consequences be damned. Mature indeed. D. 
You justify spamming the thread?
Theres no good reason to spam the thread with already posted information. Don't even try.
You guys try to justify ANYTHING, no wonder you think what E1 is doing is okay. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
47
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:54:00 -
[38] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Kyperion wrote: Says the guy with the friend throwing out N.a.z.i analogies.... You just went full ******.
No, that's you, you are defending shokar the racist bigot just because you dislike erotica1. D;  E1 causes and wants those situations. He isn't a victim. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
48
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:55:00 -
[39] - Quote
Crumplecorn wrote:Anne Dieu-le-veut wrote:This thread derails more than AMTRAK. Don't assume I know what AMTRAK is. Check your privilege americentric scum. Leave the thread. Obviously you can't handle it. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
48
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 13:58:00 -
[40] - Quote
lollerwaffle wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:lollerwaffle wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:
It is such a sad and pathetic thing to do , and I'm shocked so many people are defending it.
The point, you missed it. Because I'm not you, here's why you're missing the point: No one is defending what Erotica 1 did. What they are saying, is that Erotica 1 has not broken any rules. Therefore, calling for him to be permanently banned from the game based on his actions, which while beyond bad taste did not break any rules, is akin to requesting people to be banned because they did something that some other people don't like, regardless of whether any rules are broken or not. I await your snarky one liner which I'm sure will deliver your points in a clear and coherent manner. Are you sure he has not broken any rules... Did you write the rules? The section where it suggests he could of broken the rules has been posted a number of times. As with most EULA/TOS, it is vague whether it could be applied to E1, the decision on whether it can be applied is not down to you, me or anybody else here but by CCP and CCP alone. I imagine right now that is what CCP are doing, deciding whether they should apply those rules to E1 or not. For a second I thought you were LordofDespair and was about to congratulate you on being able to post something beyond a snarky one-liner which doesn't address or counter-argue any points. But I digress. That's the thing though. You claim that the rules are 'unclear' etc. However, your opening, and subsequent posts, have also stated the desire for Erotica 1 to be perma-banned because his behaviour was distasteful to you. If the call was for him to be banned because he might 'possibly' have broken the rules, then I would agree with you to an extent. However, using the nature of the activities someone performs as grounds to ban someone comes very close to "CCP should ban that person because I don't like him/don't like what he does". It's not the topic, more the approach. You are just mad you can't argue against me without insults and strawmanning. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
48
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:00:00 -
[41] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:
What **** analogy? Clearly you missed the point of the quote so, let me spell it out for you.
Social injustice is EVERYONE'S problem, and witch hunting is a social injustice, with the Socialists, Trade Unions and Jews as the witches. You think only ***** hate on Jews? Have you been to Infowars lately?
I would not be surprised, actually, if it was your go-to 'news' service.
How did you come up with any of that?
Ad hominem at its best. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
48
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:05:00 -
[42] - Quote
Erotica 1 wrote:All isk, assets, and skillpoints will be freely given up as the bonus round continues. I will read speeches, sing songs, and do other silly things.
EVE is just a game and we should all be able to win and lose stuff without attaching too much seriousness.
Thanks to CCP for an awesome sandbox. When I have a bit more time, I'll write a short 10 or so page response on this matter. So transparent. Thanking CCP won't make em go easy on you. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
49
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
lollerwaffle wrote: Nope. Still the same one liner. Try again.
Assuming you deserve anything more. Cute. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
49
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:18:00 -
[44] - Quote
lollerwaffle wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:lollerwaffle wrote: Nope. Still the same one liner. Try again.
Assuming you deserve anything more. Cute. Try again. Dismissing arguments with one liners is pretty weak. I'm sorry if I was brought up to have the decency of reading and responding to the opinions of other people by at least providing coherent points. It's not my fault the way you turned out. Or as you would put it: You're stupid and wrong lol You just strawmanned again. Way to prove my point. All I had to do was give you one liners. Imagine if I actually tried to give you a reasonable argument.
Now you see why is pointless to take you seriously. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
49
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:22:00 -
[45] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:lollerwaffle wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:lollerwaffle wrote: Nope. Still the same one liner. Try again.
Assuming you deserve anything more. Cute. Try again. Dismissing arguments with one liners is pretty weak. I'm sorry if I was brought up to have the decency of reading and responding to the opinions of other people by at least providing coherent points. It's not my fault the way you turned out. Or as you would put it: You're stupid and wrong lol You just strawmanned again. Way to prove my point. All I had to do was give you one liners. Imagine if I actually tried to give you a reasonable argument. Now you see why is pointless to take you seriously. Strawman... You keep using this word as if you think you know what it means. Could you tell us please? And also, provide an example. Thanks. Just so that we know how we should be arguing with you from now on.
Google it and educate yourself pleb.
Keep saying it because that's all people are doing. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
49
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 14:27:00 -
[46] - Quote
Korhaka Mirunas wrote:Since this incident I have been able to use it to start a conversation with multiple people about EVE, then used that to get 2 people to start a trial and another to return to the game.
If used right there is no such thing as bad publicity. Prove it.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
49
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:13:00 -
[47] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Tor Norman wrote:My space pixels mean something to me, so I don't want to just give them away. That doesn't mean I'm addicted to them. but they are just space pixels so what is the big deal There isn't one. Hence why calls to have Erotica 1 banned are unjustified.
The pixels aren't the issue numbnuts. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
49
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:14:00 -
[48] - Quote
Fredfredbug4 wrote:You have to look at things from both ends really. Yes, Erotica 1 and the others running his Bonus Room sadistically humiliate people as much as possible. However, choosing to participate in the bonus room is entirely the player's choice, and they can stop playing whenever they decide enough is enough.
There is a lot of pressure on the victims yes, however like Erotica 1 and his group always say it's just a game. You gave Erotica 1 a huge sum of cash and now he wants you to play a bonus round to get it back? GG well played. Bonus round participants are only those who are so greedy they are willing to make an absolute ass of themselves in a vain attempt at making money. There is as much blame on the participants as there is on Erotica 1.
Another thing, if you took advantage of Erotica 1 playing bonus round to take a look at his wallet journal I did, you'll clearly see that the only people who win the bonus rounds or get sums of 500m + Isk doubled are other ISK doublers and CODE members. The bonus rounds are a total fraud and now we have more than hearsay to prove it. If you are greedy enough to degrade yourself like that, you deserve to lose everything you put in.
Finally, Erotica 1 and his colleagues are sadistic asshats who go out of their way to make things as grueling and embarrassing as possible. They are the same kind of people who force college kids to drink themselves to death as part of an initiation. They are the same people who will goad someone to kill themselves because they think they won't have the balls to do it. They are the same people who will pretend they love someone to get money or sex.
Yes, they're only doing it in EVE, but it's the same type of personality. Manipulative, ambitious, and willing to step on others to get what they want (often entertainment). It's only a matter of time before they push someone too far and something very real and very bad happens as a result. Be it a suicide, killing, or something else that will stop the gaming community from associating EVE with "An MMORPG with spaceships where anything can happen. to "A cestpool of people who want to treat you like ****."
Basically this.
Don't want or need people like this in the community. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
52
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:"Since 1973Amnesty International-áhas adopted the simplest, broadest definition of torture:
"Torture is the systematic and deliberate infliction of acute pain by one person on another, or on a third person, in order to accomplish the purpose of the former against the will of the latter."
Erotica1 inflicts systematic and deliberate acute psychological pain, through means of several hours of subjecting the victim to demeaning and humiliating tasks alongside harassment and insulting from himself and his peers, in order to accomplish their purpose of causing the victim to leave the situation, against the will of the victim to fulfill the Bonus Rooms demands for the reward promised in the contract of the Bonus Room between the victim and the perpetrators.
It is not necessary to be restrained or prevented from being able to remove oneself from the situation, for it to constitue torture, and in this incidence, it is exactly that which the perpetrators are leveraging against the victim.
An analogy would be a wife remaining in an abusive relationship with a husband who inflicts upon her systematic and deliberate acute psychological pain, because she knows that if she files for divorce, all the assets, including the house, would remain in the property of her husband, as they are in his name. What the husband is doing to her, though superficially enabled by her remaining, nonetheless constitutes torture, as he is accomplishing the purposes of his will, namely of her remaining there for him to torture, against the will of the latter to leave the situation, as he knows full well she can and will not because then she is homeless and destitute.
That Erotica1 causes the victims acute psychological pain, is evidenced by the psychological state the conduct they are subjected to in the Bonus Room results in. The victims are obviously suffering from it. Of that there is no question. Keep posting this type of stuff, I implore you. It really is making ero's case look better and better. Yes, yes, asking someone to sing = the systematic and deliberate infliction of acute pain by one person on another. What happend;Ero: Give me your isk and I double it. Adult ATC: Here's all my isk Ero: haha, you need to come on teamspeak and win a bonus round where I invent the rules as we go Adult ATC: ok Ero: read this text please Adult ATC: Ok, N-BOMB, Gaybash, shout, scream, rant Ero: Sing songs Adult ATC: NO! N-BOMB, Gaybash, shout, scream, rant Adult ATC: I'l gonna kill you! Adult ATC: My wife will come and scream at you some more How it should have been;Ero: Give me your isk and I double it. Adult ATC: Here's all my isk Ero: haha, you need to come on teamspeak and win a bonus round where I invent the rules as we go Adult ATC: Wait what? Naaaah... You scammed me, well played. What normal people do:Ero: Give me your isk and I double it. Adult ATC: No way dude, I know it's just pixels but I want to buy space bling with them. D. 
Reported for spam.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
52
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:21:00 -
[50] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Others bring up a valid point.
EVE Online is rated TEEN - violence.
CCP simply cant afford to allow a gang of online predators to operate their pseudo-**** ring in this game, as they would be liable when a recording of a mental **** and abuse of a 12-year old kid will come out. Not a matter of if, but when.
Bottom line:
BAN THEM ALL.
Good point.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
57
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:26:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
The game rating is irrelvent. If you are a child or incompetent you shouldn't be playing it.
E1 didn't make him or anyone else do anything. They do so because they are greedy and/or stupid/incompetent. And that's on them.
Its not irrelevant just because you say it is. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
57
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:27:00 -
[52] - Quote
Danalee wrote: +1 real mature stuff here.
Says the guy spamming.  |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
57
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:33:00 -
[53] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Alp Khan wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Alp Khan wrote:You are trying to make it appear as if Erotica 1 does not do all that mental torture and abuse Asking someone to sing = mental abuse and torture I remember being mentally abused and tortured and some birthday parties when I was a kid actually....  Asking someone to post naked pictures of their significant other with the false promise that they will get their assets back and having them write your name on their bodies with mayonnaise is far from asking someone to sing a song. You are trying to whitewash Erotica 1's sadistic ploys and psychopathic mental torture on victims he derives from EVE Online. Needless to say, you are failing at that. It wouldn't surprise me if you are an Erotica 1 associate or an alt of Erotica 1 himself. PS. If you are an Erotica 1 alt, it wouldn't surprise me at all if you were abused as a children. Many victims of abuse who go rehabilitated turn to abusing others later in their lives. Many proofs presented. NOT. You are inventing stuff as we go, are you? D. 
Stop signing your posts, it makes you look arrogant.
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
60
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 15:45:00 -
[54] - Quote
PinkPanter wrote:Batelle wrote:Alp Khan wrote: Being vulnerable is not an offense to anybody. Taking advantage of the vulnerable for your own sadistic pleasure is.
But its not a violation of any rule in Eve. It becomes a violation if you use this platform to lure people out of it using predatory / extortion / false promise techniques.
Doesn't have to be illegal to be wrong. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
65
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:10:00 -
[55] - Quote
ITT too many fear mongers who think that one creep getting punishment will automatically mean it is precedent for everyone else getting perma-banned.
Way to blow things out of proportions.
Imagine if CCP did nothing, then it would be saying that they accept this kind of behavior. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
65
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:13:00 -
[56] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Man, if Ero 1 does get a ban out of this, the metagame sillyness will be amazing.
We'll need a name for "Infiltrate corp, join voicecoms, and record a person breaking the EULA/ToS to get them banned". I have just realised where I have seen your name before. http://i.imgur.com/sX0vX3z.gifWow dude, just wow
Wow indeed. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
66
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:17:00 -
[57] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
wot can I say, I got mah crazy stalkers! Even more amusing, he's Evemailed the CSM and MAJOR GAMING NOOZ WEBSITES over it.
It makes me feel wanted.
Go away creep. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
66
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:18:00 -
[58] - Quote
The fact that you can walk away doesn't excuse scumbag behavior. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
67
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:25:00 -
[59] - Quote
Andski wrote:"scumbag behavior" is one thing, "torture" is another
Torture is too strong a word, still think CCP needs to deal with E1 though.
It is bad enough that everyone thinks only psychopaths play eve, this kind of BS from E1 doesn't help matters at all. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
68
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:35:00 -
[60] - Quote
"The National Crime Prevention Council defines cyberbullying as GÇ£the process of using the Internet, cell phones or other devices to send or post text or images intended to hurt or embarrass another person."
Hes a cyberbully, records it for his other cyberbully friends to see. Simple as that. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
70
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:46:00 -
[61] - Quote
Soldarius wrote:http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/
It's happening.
"and this is why I don't play Eve anymore."
"EVE is like a Shamwow for assholes."
"Number one reason why I will never ever play EVE."
"Always liked the idea of this game but I feel the community would be too much hassle."
"With such winning personalities like this, it's not a wonder why CCP are trying to make entirely different games."
"Eve, a great place for jerks to congregate and pretend they're good at something, when in reality the only thing they're good it is being douche bags"
"Eve is full of psychopaths and sociopaths. This isn't surprising. "
"Do something about it? CCP encourages this sort of behavior. They think it's funny."
Yeah, way to make us all look bad E1. GTFO. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
70
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:53:00 -
[62] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:LordOfDespair wrote:
Yeah, way to make us all look bad E1. GTFO.
Those people say the same thing about every scam they see. Also most ganks. And all the fights. Plus that time we deadzoned that station. Also anything goons do. In short these people will never play a game like EVE anyway.
Speculation.
Also: Ganking, fighting, scamming =/= Harrassment and Public Embarrassment
|

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
70
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:54:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Of course nether text nor images were used in this case. It was only voice communication.However cute your post is, that really isn't the whole definition now is it? 
:Facepalm:
Dumbass. |

LordOfDespair
Capsuleer Combat Training Services
72
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:56:00 -
[64] - Quote
Andski wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:I'm pretty sure any vet,ever, who has been tortured, or anyone who has been tortured, would agree that torture, no matter how slight some may perceive it as, is still wrong, in ALL its occurances. yeah I'm sure that a former POW who was subjected to actual torture will most deffo sympathize with this guy
I'm sure the POW wouldn't want anybody treated poorly. No matter how servere.
I'm also sure that statements like these hold no argumentative value.
|
|
|