|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
GrowlingMadScientist
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
1
   |
Posted - 2014.03.29 13:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Oh the delicious sociopath tears in this thread. 
Voice communication has opened up new doors of personal interaction between players in the last decade and personal, emotional abuse by 'empathically challenged' people is something that should not be tolerated anywhere and especially not in and around this game.
Erotica 1 and his friends should have stuck to smearing their names with ***** on each other, for all I care. But what happened in this particular instance of the bonus round was just wrong.
I am glad that Malcanis was finally convinced of this. Even if his opinion alone wouldn't have an effect on the CSM's or CCP's judgment, I was a bit worried having someone condoning this behavior in the CSM. I do not play much, but I have observed this game for over 10 years now, so I do care a little. |
GrowlingMadScientist
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 14:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:GrowlingMadScientist wrote:Oh the delicious sociopath tears in this thread. I see you enjoy tears. Welcome, fellow sociopath.
You could not be further from the truth. I just added this sentence as a - you know - 'educational component'. |
GrowlingMadScientist
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 08:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
SKINE DMZ wrote:Does anyone care what the "victim" thought in this situation? He didn't even think of himself of a victim, until riptard publicly shamed him even worse..
In these cases the opinion of the victim does not count much, look up the term "Stockholm syndrome". |
GrowlingMadScientist
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 08:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Asia Leigh wrote:GrowlingMadScientist wrote:SKINE DMZ wrote:Does anyone care what the "victim" thought in this situation? He didn't even think of himself of a victim, until riptard publicly shamed him even worse.. In these cases the opinion of the victim does not count much, look up the term "Stockholm syndrome". Surely your trolling right? Because we all know Rokhar was a kidnapping victim being held against his will... >.> 0/10
It is not restricted to hostage scenario's, that's only where it was first observed and classified.
Read the definition, even the 2nd paragraph on wikipedia states:
'Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other."' |
GrowlingMadScientist
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 09:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
Asia Leigh wrote:
I would buy this if Sokhar had been keeping in contact with erotica. Evidence shows the only interaction these 2 parties had were last month when the scam took place, and just last week after the **** hit the fan. Also did you even listen to the last half hour of the scam recording. Do you really think he was having a bonding experience with Erotica? Sounds to me like he wanted to rip Erotica's head off.
So again what does 'Stockholm syndrome' have anything to do with this case?
From what I have read, Sokhar has defended/played down what had happened. And if that's the case a mild 'Stockholm syndrome' could be an explanation.
I haven't heard the recording of the later interactions you mentioned, though. In any case the opinion of the 'victim' does not matter much, just as in the case of domestic violence. If someone gets injured the authorities will act, even if the victim defends the perpetrator. At least in most civilized countries I guess. |
|
|
| |
|