| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
246
   |
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cedric deBouilard wrote:so... did Erotica 1 got banned or not?
I couldn't get anything from out of CCP corporate-speech
Just add him to your watch list and see if he stops logging in. |
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
247
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 17:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:fudface wrote:Kirsi Kirjasto wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Thanks CCP and I hope you never do take the sand box out of the game. I'm waiting for Erotica 1 to post before I assume this. from what i saw of that imgur link that was posted he cant log in. +1 CCP looks like there is a limit to what you can get away with. Accounts are always suspended when they're under investigation so gg Ripar Teg for using your position to prevent another player from being able to play eve. I think there's something in the EULA about that too.
His being a member of the CSM is a tangential issue. EVERY player is allowed to comment on the goings on of EvE. He didn't abuse any CSM authority in making a blog post about what he thought was reprehensible. Any one of us could have done the exact same thing
|
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
249
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 18:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Shizuken wrote:His being a member of the CSM is a tangential issue. EVERY player is allowed to comment on the goings on of EvE. He didn't abuse any CSM authority in making a blog post about what he thought was reprehensible. Any one of us could have done the exact same thing
Who said anything about his position on the CSM? I was referring mainly to his blog and his influence over other players, though for a CSM member to be involved in such a spiteful personal campaign to try to get votes is just creepy.
Ohh please! Stop with the BS already. My boots are only so high.
Your contention here makes no sense. If you werent referring to his CSM status then he is still justified in speaking out on issues surrounding Eve. There is nothing wrong in bringing issues to light for open discussion.
I think your real gripe, which you cant really argue without looking weak, is that there are more people out there than you thought that find this type of behavior unacceptable, and that for once on these forums we have been louder and more convincing than people like you. |
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
252
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 21:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Malcanis wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:So if you've clearly defined the lines, is it against the rules to ransom for a song, and if a "victim" of the ransom were to feel harassed, would that mean it's over the line? How many songs are "too many"?
If it's so clear, it will be pretty straightforward to answer right? Do you think you're capable of detecting when you're pushing another human being over the line? That depends entirely on the human being in question.
A true sociopath here. This isn't about a victim's REaction. It is about the perpetrator's ACTION. There is a difference, which for inexplicable reasons you seem unable to distinguish. |
| |
|