|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
306
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
why are you giving the ashimmu another low when it can tank a easy 90kehp without slaves? that litterly does nothing for it....
o yeah and like the pirate frigate thread. new ashimmu sucks. will never be used. etcetc read pirate frigate thread for details |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
306
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 14:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Morning fellows
I've been reading as fast as I can and I'm almost up to most current post but I'm about to be stuck in meetings for a few hours so I wanted to respond to what I'm seeing so far.
Everyone seems unhappy with the Cynabal - fair enough. The balance oriented folks here are going to have a sit down this afternoon to discuss options to add some more unique flavor to the line. Failing any large changes, I'll at least look at the powegrid and make sure Artillery is viable.
Vigilant powergrid seems to be at least a mild concern so I'll look at that again. I'm not sure there will be changes here because if I remember correctly it was trivial to do 1600 + mwd + at least Ions which is probably a bit generous. Will check it out though.
Phantasm is mix of excitement and concern about the tension between the bonuses (guns + speed and sig + shields) which is fair, but I think this is part of what makes it interesting and I'm not really worried about it not being strong enough. Part of how I justified the weird bonus set is by looking at how it performs as a simple MWD/shield skrimisher, which it does quite well.
Hopefully back with more in a few hours. Thanks for the response (except you Capqu) thanks in advanced for the additional low on the ashimmu it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy that you were thinking ahead that i would need to fit a reactor control unit with the corresponding reduction in powergrid IN ADDITION to the t2 ancillary current router that is on ALL ashimmus currently.
dont minmatar ships have perfect fitting? why can blood raiders get that ? actually make them somewhat decent instead of utterly garbage. o yeah ill mention this again, needs 2 webs to hold down anything. so yay no point ashimmu strikes again.
i normally would argue against buffing this peice of garbage but honestly. please buff the cynabal more, i havent seen a cynabal in amarr/minmatar fw for 2 years, killed them all with our vengeances.
|

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
306
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 18:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Liam Inkuras wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:Naomi Anthar wrote:Wow thanks for keeping quiet substantial pwg nerf on vigilant while you save Cyna/Ashimmu !!! Gj Rise. Cynas should stay as good as they are and Ashimmu won't suffer with pwg since it won't fit one more med neut/nos at all. CCP has this idea that 800mm plates are actually viable, I think. Mixed with an AAR, 800mm plates are indeed quite viable. Quit being such a bitter soul and open your mind. yeah? how many more seconds will a 800 and AAR live against 5 vexor navys? compared to 1600.
less i think |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
306
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Medalyn Isis wrote:Just edited EveHQ, and one thing is for certain, the Ashimmu is going to be a hell of a lot of fun with those endless vampires. It has just enough PG to sustain a full rack of nuets / vamps with two med armour reppers. Unfortunately no plate though, but with enough cap to sustain two active reppers, that makes up for it. Thank you Rise, cannot wait to try out this beast. It is finally going to be good at what is it meant to be good at, nueting out a target and being a complete ***** to kill. The endless nuets will give it a whole new niche of its own.
your insane. right now the ashimmu does its role just fine. without the 90% web everything will just burn away. 2 medium armor reps? you cant be serious that wont last in any serious fight. RIGHT NOW the ashimmu is fine with 2 1600's 5 medium neuts and 1 or 2 90% webs. its perfect for switching off logi chains as we speak. the proposed change will make it useless. as all targets will litterly afterburner away from it. it has to sacrafice 2 mids for webs just to hold down a logi.
o yeah 2 reps? so what is that like 600 dps tank under links? so 2 vexor navy's will just kill you. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
306
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Battleships coming soon  I'm not sure exactly when we will be able to get this stuff on Singularity but hopefully it won't be too long. if the macherial isnt nerfed enough.....
all these angel cartel players have had years of free bumps and ccp announced in the past the nerf is coming so yeah. i await tears. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
306
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 17:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote: your insane. right now the ashimmu does its role just fine. without the 90% web everything will just burn away. 2 medium armor reps? you cant be serious that wont last in any serious fight. RIGHT NOW the ashimmu is fine with 2 1600's 5 medium neuts and 1 or 2 90% webs. its perfect for switching off logi chains as we speak. the proposed change will make it useless. as all targets will litterly afterburner away from it. it has to sacrafice 2 mids for webs just to hold down a logi.
o yeah 2 reps? so what is that like 600 dps tank under links? so 2 vexor navy's will just kill you.
Two ships can kill one, color me surprised.... Webs are useless because every player in the game only fit ab's and drift away before you can kill them. This is true for every ship.
yeah? you think 2 omen navys are gonna kill a stabber fleet? i think not. color me whatever.
then buy your ******** reasoning the current ashimmu is the only ship in game that ships cant escape from. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
307
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 14:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Draco Knight wrote:Give the ashimmu nos range bonus only and give back the 1 high slot, loose 1 med slot for the additional 1 low slot instead. Would be so much more brawler!!! Could even nano it with the additional speed boost... lol!
Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch M Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu Corpum A-Type Medium Nosferatu
Warp Disruptor II Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Medium Armor Repairer II Medium Ancillary Armor Repairer, Nanite Repair Paste Damage Control II Heat Sink II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Medium Auxiliary Nano Pump I Medium Nanobot Accelerator I Medium Nanobot Accelerator I no god no. loosing a mid on this ship will be devastating. this fit doesnt work on any of the 3 mid amarr ships and it wont work on this ship either. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
310
|
Posted - 2014.04.13 04:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Xavier Thorm wrote:Also, can we get a less horrendously ugly model for the Gila already?  get out if they change the ape carrying a briefcase im canceling sub(gila) |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
311
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 21:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Viribus wrote:So the Cynabal is basically a Vagabond that gains the ability to get on grid quickly while losing the ability to do anything useful on grid. Sweeeeeeeeeeet
Rise, dawg, I love what you've done with most of the pirate faction stuff. Really. But man you've gotta figure out a unique role for the non-Machariel Angel ships that sets them apart from their Minmatar counterparts. "Warping quickly" isn't a role, it is a role since high sec freighter ganking is a eve career |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
311
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 02:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
so literally how about a response to the gila
web one medium drone and kite it, half the dps of it is gone? |
|

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
312
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 16:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ashley Animus wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:so literally how about a response to the gila
web one medium drone and kite it, half the dps of it is gone? Whats so wrong with having the Ewar on your drones instead of yourself? All drones in bay will most likely have more HP than the ship. Edit: Did some quick math. Shield: 1005 = Eff HP: 1436 Armor: 2160 = Eff Hp: 3323 Structure: 5325 Total Eff Hp: 10084 You can fit 10 medium drones in the bay so, 10084 x 10 = 100840 Effective hp inside your drone bay if you carry only Hammerheads Edit 2: Augmented hammers are pretty cheap and they have numbers that will scare you. pointless information is pointless. has nothing to do with my question. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
312
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 18:28:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ashley Animus wrote:
The more Ewar is off your back the better. And the drones can take it with ease.
english do you speak it? |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
313
|
Posted - 2014.04.19 23:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote: The ashimmu can get its old school neuts, it also should lose a high and a mid for 2 extra lows and a armour resistance bonus. Making it a tanky neut (nos) ship that shines in small scale hac fleets. (no idea what to do with the cruor)
the ashimmu already shines in hac fleets being the only t1 ship to survive heavy amounts of dps.
2 extra lows. so a 7 low ashimmu, with neuts. so its literately another amarr ship. wheres the minmatar parts come in? is it gonna get insane speed boost to? so that it can claim to be half minmatar |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
317
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 15:45:00 -
[14] - Quote
King Fu Hostile wrote:So CCP why did you have to make the Vigilant even more useless as it currently is?
What was the reasoning for the PG nerf?
almost nothing is changing with the vigilant. except now it cant have the best tank and the best guns.
so settle down |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
317
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 23:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
King Fu Hostile wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:King Fu Hostile wrote:So CCP why did you have to make the Vigilant even more useless as it currently is?
What was the reasoning for the PG nerf?
almost nothing is changing with the vigilant. except now it cant have the best tank and the best guns. so settle down It can't even fit a 1600mm RRT, T2 MWD and neutrons currently on TQ. Again, why did it need the nerf? i dont no what RRT means but currently on TQ.
and obviously it needs a nerf because you have to choose between tank and dps. and here the vigilant clearly gets both.
[Vigilant, 56] Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Damage Control II
Medium Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 800 Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Void M
Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Trimark Armor Pump II Medium Ancillary Current Router II
Valkyrie II x5 |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
318
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 12:41:00 -
[16] - Quote
King Fu Hostile wrote:
T2 fitting rig, gg
so your gonna cry over a extra 35 mil on this ship? fine you CAN put on a t1 ACR by putting on a meta4 cap injector.
oh, and my t2 trimarks last i checked arnt those like 10 mil or somthing? super cheap compared to years ago where it was like 500mil for a t2 trimark or something ridiculous. There is no reason this day and age to not be using t2 rigs on everyship since they became so cheap.
about that 1600 plate comment. yeah meta4 1600's are still very standard in alot of ships NOT excluding the vigilant. I wont even discuss the meta4 prop comment.
Cannibal Kane wrote:
Fitting a ANC Rig currently is not required if you bling it up.
I don't mind fitting nerfs, what does bother me it is being done on a ship already rarely used. If you are going to nerf a ship that is popular to curb it's use like they did with Cane I can understand.
The Vigilant I don't. If you want to change I would understand if they tried to make it more popular.. but not in this instance.
vigilant rarely used? i see this ship used more than the diemost on most hac gangs. it isn't rarely used by a long shot. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
366
|
Posted - 2014.05.21 05:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sheimi Madaveda wrote:I wonder if the Ashimmu will play out as a strong kiter... I mean, it has dual 20km webs, and with a major speed boost coming as well as an extra low slot, it seems plausible. Also, it is possible to keep the capacitor up with Nosferatu as a-types have 19.5km range.
I wouldn't expect to see it as a full blown kiter -mostly because it will still lack speed and agility, and not using a cap booster means your cap is very weak and therefore not really able to use an active tank- but the possibility is definitely there. it would need 5 mids to do long point kiting. it cant |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
390
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 06:41:00 -
[18] - Quote
all these cynabears crying cuz they cant fit all t2 largest tank and guns anymore without grid rigs or co-pro's
LOL |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
391
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 17:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Zamyslinski wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:all these cynabears crying cuz they cant fit all t2 largest tank and guns anymore without grid rigs or co-pro's
LOL you do reaise you can fit all other criusers without any compromise? yeah? except the ashimmu, phantasm, vigilant, oh yeah and the gila. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
393
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
elitatwo wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:Zamyslinski wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:all these cynabears crying cuz they cant fit all t2 largest tank and guns anymore without grid rigs or co-pro's
LOL you do reaise you can fit all other criusers without any compromise? yeah? except the ashimmu, phantasm, vigilant, oh yeah and the gila. Shhhh, you forgot the Moa, the Thorax, the Maller, the Omen and the list continues... Ever tried to fit 250mm railguns on a Moa or an eagle? I have yet to find a boat that is smaller than a battleship to fit them on and fit a tank. yeah i was just ASSuming he meant to say pirate cruisers.
if it was t1 cruisers included and faction cruisers this list would be almost all cruisers except winmatar. |
|
|
|
|