|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
Viribus
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
180
   |
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hey remember when you guys introduced tier 3 BCs and no one ever saw Cynabals again? Then all those t1 cruiser buffs, navy cruiser buffs, and HAC buffs? Good thing the Cynabal's getting a nerf, it's such a terrifying and viable ship currently (this is sarcasm) |
Viribus
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
180
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:Still no real reason to fly a cynabal over other equivalent options.
Also 90% webs still broken,
Vaga's better by pretty much every conceivable metric. Even price.
i can't wait for the pirate BS "rebalancing" where they turn the machariel into a really expensive tempest |
Viribus
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
185
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
lmao all these people thinking the cynabal is OP or even viable. Jesus it's like eve-o's knowledge of the metagame is perpetually stuck 3 years behind the curve.
I bet you guys still think the hurricane is overpowered |
Viribus
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
209
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 01:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
So the Cynabal is basically a Vagabond that gains the ability to get on grid quickly while losing the ability to do anything useful on grid. Sweeeeeeeeeeet
Rise, dawg, I love what you've done with most of the pirate faction stuff. Really. But man you've gotta figure out a unique role for the non-Machariel Angel ships that sets them apart from their Minmatar counterparts. "Warping quickly" isn't a role, especially not when once they warp somewhere they basically just provide moderate DPS. The Mach gets a pass because it's the only battleship that can sort of kite and keep up with cruisers, and even then its role as fast battleship-sized DPS has been somewhat superseded by tier 3 BCs.
Serp ships are the only ones with 90% webs, Blood ships are the only ones with pre-nerf nosferatus, Sansha ships are the only non-T3s with AB bonuses, the Gurista ships aren't all that unique but drones are so broken at the moment it doesn't really matter. The Cynabal needs something to set it apart from the zillion other cruiser-sized kiting ships. A point range bonus, MWD cap use bonus, some sort of ewar/tackle resistance, anything. Hell at this point I'd be satisfied with a TP bonus. Just something to make it more than a Vagabond that's better in some ways and worse in a whole lot more.
I think you're seriously overestimating how useful all the Angel ships are seen by PVPers in 2014. Even the Machariel collects dust in this age of 2km/s cruisers, MWD-sig-reduced HACs, and ubiquitous interceptors. |
Viribus
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
246
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 19:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sarnia Aldurad wrote:Sure let me clarify now that I've calmed down :)
GILA Impact analysis ------------------------------------
BOUNUS CHANGES::
Gallente Cruiser Bonus:
10% bonus to kinetic and thermal missile damage
versus a 10% drone damage and hitpoints for all drone types
Role Bonus:
500% bonus to medium drone damage and hitpoints
versus 50% bonus to Light Missile and Rocket max velocity giving us extended range
SLOT Changes:
Drones (bandwidth / bay): 20(-105) / 100(-300)
so -- we lose 105m3 of bandwidth and now have the ability to launch only an un-bonused flight of lights, or a super beefy flight of mediums. No more heavies or sentries, and no more geckos
we also lose 300m3 of logistics space for our drones overall. we now have room for just (2) flights of medium drones on our bays.... versus the massed wings I have available to me now.
We are going from a robust, hugely versatile Drone Sniper, to something that is, indeed more focused, but a mere shadow of what it was. Hope that helps clarify.
SA
It actually has room for 5 flights of medium drones
Math really isn't your thing, is it
|
Viribus
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
260
|
Posted - 2014.05.25 00:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejmzGelUWpY |
|
|
| |
|