Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

GokuZWar
Maverick Fleet Systems AAA Citizens
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
i'll repost what this guy said on facebook comments cuz i agree with it...lol:
Quote:All i see here is more lag, less fun...get on with the stuff that'll help this game move forward and stop playing dolls.
|
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
828

|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:31:00 -
[32] - Quote
Grideris wrote:So what percentage of CCP characters are actually wearing pants then?
Pants? CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|

Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:35:00 -
[33] - Quote
To the team that did it, nice work- it looks good and you all did a great job.
It's not a huge thing in terms of what's really anticipated but you don't deserve to have something you worked on driven down the crapper simply because of the NeX. |

Daedalus Arcova
Havoc Violence and Chaos BricK sQuAD.
97
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:36:00 -
[34] - Quote
Does this mean we can see if Zulu wears $1,000 pants in EVE as well? |

Lateris
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:38:00 -
[35] - Quote
This is great addition for the eye candy. I think this is very nice balance between spaceships and WiS for added content. Just my opinion , please do not turn WiS into a Micro transaction festival. it will kill WiS. |

Sarah Ichijou
Regional Park Services Tactical Narcotics Team
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:43:00 -
[36] - Quote
I'm not going to use it. But it doesn't affect my gameplay. So... +1, and hope that those who love spinning people in space find it worth it |

Vedje
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:48:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kinda useless |
|

CCP karkur
C C P C C P Alliance
0

|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:55:00 -
[38] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:why is there a button for it? can't you just press the portrait? As it can take some time for the character to load, we wanted to make sure people would only be opening the Avatar Viewer if that was what they intended to do, and not opening it by accident when trying to move the portrait window or something like that  |
|

Hakuja
White Snake Inc.
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 17:56:00 -
[39] - Quote
Sarah Ichijou wrote:I'm not going to use it. But it doesn't affect my gameplay. So... +1, and hope that those who love spinning people in space find it worth it I agree. This is not what I want, but at least it's optional. Thank you, CCP. |

Reten Kip
Everset Dropbears
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:02:00 -
[40] - Quote
This would be nice except that there's no variety in clothing. The only way to fix that is to ditch Aurum and the Nex store, get a few artists producing clothing full time, and allowing players to manufacture it.
If you don't do that, you may as well give up on WiS because we all will look the same forever.
Edit: Fix your damn forums. |
|

Maxwell Albritten
Gallente Trade Union Moon Warriors
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:06:00 -
[41] - Quote
M Kapitany wrote:Of all the worst possible things that could happen, this is
THE
WORST
POSSIBLE
THING!!
Sup, Brony?
Anyways....
A random, OK feature. Doesn't really distract from anything and the idea of "avatar spinning" is kinda fun. It is also a small, decent step towards making character design matter.
But yea, the dev blog its self was terrible. Just "Hey it's a thing! LOOK!" post. I couldn't have written anything better in the least, but I'm only paid to give nonconstructive criticism. |

m3talc0re X
SandStorm. The Babylon Consortium
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:11:00 -
[42] - Quote
Seriously, I don't imagine this took too much work to make happen. So I doubt we're missing out on a bunch of extra features to to make this work. You people b**** and moan too much. No wonder they were only posting one blog a month. I like these constant updates from CCP. This isn't game changing or game breaking. It's just a little extra added coolness that plenty of us have wanted.
If you don't like it, don't open it. You're not losing anything. Quit b****ing.
Anyway, awesome sauce Guard. Now if we just had some more choices in clothing to chose from :P |

Baljos Arnjak
Dark Praetorian Order
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
You guys gotta remember, this is Monday, they're not going to lead off with the best stuff in the first part of the week. They're saving the good stuff for later on |

CanonMP180
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:19:00 -
[44] - Quote
I find this sort of thing irritating. I accept that it *may* have been almost complete before CCP's "change in direction", but as soon as you see that people have been working on a minor aesthetic improvement like this it rings alarm bells.
I mean c'mon... this... as a dev blog? Let's put it into perspective from a player's point of view, I'll use other aesthetically related dev blogs for comparison:
Dev blog comes out announcing the new nebula backgrounds, it sounds great and it will effect everyone who plays the game (with the exception of hard core traders who just sit in stations, but they're a weird, if very wealthy, lot). This is generally well received by the players.
Dev blog comes out announcing changes to the UI allowing scaling. It's generally well received because it's potentially tremendously helpful for a large number of people.
And then we get this... A minor feature (in comparison) which will effect a handful of players who want to gawk at the pretty pixels of another player's avatar. It's not on a par with new ships, massive changes to how pos's are run, cap ship balancing, hybrid weapon balancing, player owned customs offices... etc.. etc.. so why announce it in it's own dev blog as if it is?
I'm not saying it shouldn't be implemented, I'm not saying it's a waste of time (although, depending on how long it took, you have to question whether the resources could have been better spent elsewhere at the moment), but I am saying that presenting it as a dev blog was a bad decision. Many players are still sensitive about the whole micro-transaction debacle CCP blundered into, the last thing CCP want to do is tear up the patches of trust that have started to grow back on their player base's confidence in them. Presenting something as a feature which is clearly linked to custom clothing, and as such micro-transactions at this time was not as sensitive as it might have been imo. |

Jiji Hamin
Federal Defence Union Gallente Federation
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:22:00 -
[45] - Quote
Apollo Gabriel wrote: Glad to see this blog takes priority over Factional Warfare.
|

GRIEV3R
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:23:00 -
[46] - Quote
At worst, this is a silly and frivolous feature that's not going to hurt anything. In light of all the excellent work CCP has been doing since summer, I'm certainly not going to get upset about this. Carry on gentlemen. Carry on. |

TheLostPenguin
Surreal Departure
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:27:00 -
[47] - Quote
meh really, it's hardly an awesome groundbreaking feature, but it is something that's kinda part of the feature set if you're going to have customisable avatars.
Best of all it's done CORRECTLY in that it's there for those that give a monkeys, and for those that don't it has zero impact on their ongoing gameplay and can be safely ignored. I can seriously see this as having replaced the standard character portrait on showinfo screen by default with no way to turn it off, given some of the somewhat dubious decisions taken in recent times regarding ramming new stuff down people throats purely because it's new and shiny, grats for a sensible deployment CCP. |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
110
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:27:00 -
[48] - Quote
so this is incarna multiplayer ? :P |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
Does it use the character creation graphics or the ingame engine cq graphics or something else?
Do they move?
Can you make em bend over?
All in all not the sort of thing I was hoping for "ambulation wise" but at least some work has been done.
Quit brave of you to just flaunt this feature, because its a sensitive subject. You kept it short and sweet and included big graphics, but don't be afraid to actually explain the feature and what it will do. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Can we make sure that the curtains match the drapes when configuring hair styles as well?
I really like symmetry. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |
|

Largo Coronet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:36:00 -
[51] - Quote
M Kapitany wrote:Of all the worst possible things that could happen, this is
THE
WORST
POSSIBLE
THING!! Brony spotted...
Ah well, nobody expected you to give up entirely on Space Barbies, and this is a positive step in making them more viable.
But remember, it's the SHIPS we really want to customize. If you'd focused on that in the first place, you'd be selling Aurum like Ikea sells cheap plywood by now.
|

Lord Okinaba
Zero Patrol
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:38:00 -
[52] - Quote
Nice, but not exactly blog worthy. |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Grideris wrote:So what percentage of CCP characters are actually wearing pants then?
Pants?
a kind of underwear intented to wear on your head ;)
|

m3talc0re X
SandStorm. The Babylon Consortium
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:39:00 -
[54] - Quote
CCP Guard, please don't let the moaning tards discourage you or any other dev team members from releasing blogs letting us know of upcoming goodies. |

David Magnus
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
M Kapitany wrote:Of all the worst possible things that could happen, this is
THE
WORST
POSSIBLE
THING!!
For my bronys: http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate |

Damion Rayne
Dark-Rising Executive Outcomes
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:45:00 -
[56] - Quote
In before, "ZOMG Incarna sucks,! Whyfor you suck CCP? Whyfor you not do what I want you to do? This is my game!!!"
Oh wait... Teamwork.. Maturity.. Tactics.. www.tacticalgamer.com |

Alastar Frost
EVE University Ivy League
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 18:56:00 -
[57] - Quote
If you do that, please add the option to actually not wear pants.
Currently choosing a pant is one of the forced options in the character creator. If you want us to look for people without pants, let us remove them in the first place  |

Zimmy Zeta
Battle Force Industries
26
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:02:00 -
[58] - Quote
I am imagining the first CCP meeting after Hilmar's blog. The devs where discussing wich devblog to publish first, to calm the raging mob. And some troll at CCP voted for this one, just to unleash the epic sh*tstorm.  |

Strike Severasse
Red Dead Redemption
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:04:00 -
[59] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:CCP Solomon whom you all know from the recent Core Technology video has a new dev blog out on the Full Body Avatar Viewer....!
They need to be able to INTERACT with OTHER characters!!!
- to sit in a common lounge for the sake of more interactive chat - to view outside the station for POS/Station campers
something needs to be useful else why!
Buying stuff for nothing, self vanity alone? is just stupid and not part of the game!
>>> I'd rather keep a mirror on my desktop then look at my character "alone". <<<
.... gates are like roids, dont give in to beer camping
now lets welcome the high sec in with open arms, err open gates, then slowly close the doors behind them... hooked on excitement again...... while the old carebear and camper doze zzzzzzzz ! |

Klam
Church of Boom
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:11:00 -
[60] - Quote
CanonMP180 wrote:I'm not saying it shouldn't be implemented, I'm not saying it's a waste of time (although, depending on how long it took, you have to question whether the resources could have been better spent elsewhere at the moment), but I am saying that presenting it as a dev blog was a bad decision. Many players are still sensitive about the whole micro-transaction debacle CCP blundered into, the last thing CCP want to do is tear up the patches of trust that have started to grow back on their player base's confidence in them. Presenting something as a feature which is clearly linked to custom clothing, and as such micro-transactions at this time was not as sensitive as it might have been imo.
That's a great way to explain the reaction some of us are having. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |