Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

knowsitall
Adeptus iNdustry and Logistics Silent Eviction
22
|
Posted - 2014.04.26 12:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Quote:Reduce copy time on all blueprints to be less time consuming than manufacturing something out of it. This gives the option to use blueprint copies to build items at Starbases without risking the original.
From the building better worlds blog.
Very interesting proposal. This must be first time I have EVER seen tech 2 BPOs get a buff. If tech 2 BPOs can now be copied quicker than they can be built, then once the lag of waiting for the first copies has finished each BPO will create more items per time than before the change.
That could have an interesting affect on T2 invention for some of the less popular ships and modules.
Knowsitall |

Marcus Iunius Brutus
NerdRage Inc.
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.26 14:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
knowsitall wrote:Quote:Reduce copy time on all blueprints to be less time consuming than manufacturing something out of it. This gives the option to use blueprint copies to build items at Starbases without risking the original. From the building better worlds blog. Very interesting proposal. This must be first time I have EVER seen tech 2 BPOs get a buff.
On the other hand copying T2 BPO and manufacturing from BPCs will require more clicking.
After few months of T2 invention/production I realized that it might possible that people buy T2 BPOs mostly for the reduced amount of clicking it requires.... ;) |

Samroski
Games Inc. The Night Crew Alliance
454
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 10:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
This is all we need! A buff to these over-priced items :)
If I understand the changes correctly, the T2 BPO that you want to copy needs to be in the POS. Not many people will risk that. I suppose using NPC copy slots in a non-busy system would be the best way to make copies.
Maybe the cost of using NPC slots would neutralize the buff? Any colour you like. |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
296
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 20:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Samroski wrote:Maybe the cost of using NPC slots would neutralize the buff? Not likely. Invention needs to use those same copy slots.
MDD
|

Proton Power
Evolution Northern Coalition.
16
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 00:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
Not really a buff.
Most T2 BPO Owners produce in POS's for faster run times / factory slots.
With this update not many T2 BPO owners will do this, meaning less production speed. So while they can get a 6% boost and do more work for it, they still lose on what they are getting today in a POS. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2751
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 01:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
Proton Power wrote:Not really a buff.
Most T2 BPO Owners produce in POS's for faster run times / factory slots.
With this update not many T2 BPO owners will do this, meaning less production speed. So while they can get a 6% boost and do more work for it, they still lose on what they are getting today in a POS.
Smart T2 BPO owners will copy in highsec POSes on alts that are untraceable (if their main is known/suspected to own T2 BPOs). Those alts will be in unremarkable 1-person corps just like the thousands of other 1-person corps in highsec that have research POSes, and the POS will be in an undesirable location (not close to trade hubs, etc).
Ask around for what merc groups charge for highsec large POS removal (usually ~1b if the POS is expected to be undefended). Would you spend a billion blowing up an unremarkable POS on the hope that it is one of the few POSes with a high value blueprint in it? Not without considerable intel. Set the universe on fire - then sell the survivors ash. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
233
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 02:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Proton Power wrote:Not really a buff.
Most T2 BPO Owners produce in POS's for faster run times / factory slots.
With this update not many T2 BPO owners will do this, meaning less production speed. So while they can get a 6% boost and do more work for it, they still lose on what they are getting today in a POS. Smart T2 BPO owners will copy in highsec POSes on alts that are untraceable (if their main is known/suspected to own T2 BPOs). Those alts will be in unremarkable 1-person corps just like the thousands of other 1-person corps in highsec that have research POSes, and the POS will be in an undesirable location (not close to trade hubs, etc). Ask around for what merc groups charge for highsec large POS removal (usually ~1b if the POS is expected to be undefended). Would you spend a billion blowing up an unremarkable POS on the hope that it is one of the few POSes with a high value blueprint in it? Not without considerable intel.
Actually most merc group won't touch larges, regardless of expected resistance. Either way the owner can cancel their job and put the BPO back in station. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2753
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 02:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Loraine Gess wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Proton Power wrote:Not really a buff.
Most T2 BPO Owners produce in POS's for faster run times / factory slots.
With this update not many T2 BPO owners will do this, meaning less production speed. So while they can get a 6% boost and do more work for it, they still lose on what they are getting today in a POS. Smart T2 BPO owners will copy in highsec POSes on alts that are untraceable (if their main is known/suspected to own T2 BPOs). Those alts will be in unremarkable 1-person corps just like the thousands of other 1-person corps in highsec that have research POSes, and the POS will be in an undesirable location (not close to trade hubs, etc). Ask around for what merc groups charge for highsec large POS removal (usually ~1b if the POS is expected to be undefended). Would you spend a billion blowing up an unremarkable POS on the hope that it is one of the few POSes with a high value blueprint in it? Not without considerable intel. Actually most merc group won't touch larges, regardless of expected resistance. Either way the owner can cancel their job and put the BPO back in station.
The BPO is at risk while in active transport from the POS to the station, however.
If I was fairly sure that "Climate Industries Inc" (a 1-person alt corp) were copying a Mackinaw BPO at their POS in Mirilene (a fairly unimportant system 5j from Dodixie that's not likely to be in high demand), I might well pay mercs to attack the POS and keep cloaky eyes on grid the whole time, watching for any attempt to rescue a BPO and ready to interrupt it.
However, this is something you probably wouldn't even do if you thought there was a 50% chance that Climate Industries Inc had a lower value BPO (say Null M) in their station. It's a massive undertaking. Set the universe on fire - then sell the survivors ash. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
233
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 02:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: The BPO is at risk while in active transport from the POS to the station, however.
If I was fairly sure that "Climate Industries Inc" (a 1-person alt corp) were copying a Mackinaw BPO at their POS in Mirilene (a fairly unimportant system 5j from Dodixie that's not likely to be in high demand), I might well pay mercs to attack the POS and keep cloaky eyes on grid the whole time, watching for any attempt to rescue a BPO and ready to interrupt it.
However, this is something you probably wouldn't even do if you thought there was a 50% chance that Climate Industries Inc had a lower value BPO (say Null M) in their station. It's a massive undertaking.
Theoretically it's at risk, but when you can transport that BPO out in a 1m EHP proteus which could be pointing to one or more stations (or a safe in between!) and a dozen other things, the risk becomes statistically negligible.
Basically, I think we agree? |

Aluka 7th
138
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 10:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
Loraine Gess wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote: The BPO is at risk while in active transport from the POS to the station, however.
If I was fairly sure that "Climate Industries Inc" (a 1-person alt corp) were copying a Mackinaw BPO at their POS in Mirilene (a fairly unimportant system 5j from Dodixie that's not likely to be in high demand), I might well pay mercs to attack the POS and keep cloaky eyes on grid the whole time, watching for any attempt to rescue a BPO and ready to interrupt it.
However, this is something you probably wouldn't even do if you thought there was a 50% chance that Climate Industries Inc had a lower value BPO (say Null M) in their station. It's a massive undertaking.
Theoretically it's at risk, but when you can transport that BPO out in a 1m EHP proteus which could be pointing to one or more stations (or a safe in between!) and a dozen other things, the risk becomes statistically negligible. Basically, I think we agree?
You forgot that proteus can also be cloaky with that tank. Usually its 500k EHP with "cheap" fit. And also off-grid instas are usefull. |

Proton Power
Evolution Northern Coalition.
16
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 16:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
While I do understand what you are saying in regards that it is faily safe to copy BPO's in the POS and just take them out "IF" war dec'd.
The issue is that means you can never ever be gone for 25hrs. As an example:
I know Joe Pilot is producing copies of 5 various T2 BPO's in his POS. I watch Joe Pilot, I see when he signs in, out, when does he seem to go away for longer periods of times, does he never log in on Mondays?
I then plan my war dec accordingly, and hit the POS before he knows it was War Dec'd. Once the POS is hit there is nothing he can do to get the BPO's safely except try and protect his POS. The BPO's are locked down in modules that are now offline, so he can't take them out.
Granted this takes some planning, knowledge and not 100%, but its still very doable.
I don't see many T2 BPO owners taking this chance, maybe I am wrong... |

Volar Kang
Kang Industrial
152
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 19:20:00 -
[12] - Quote
If I had a T2 BPO after these changes I would have it moved to a system with copy slots 12 jumps from a trade hub and make my copies there. Why risk a BPO like this in a POS where you have to pay for and haul ice, log in everyday to check for a wardec and all the other issues with POS's when you can safely make copies in stations away from trade hubs and save a ton over paying for a POS and fuel.
If you run 10 copy jobs for each of your three toons per day AND for some reason the cost for each job averages 100k isk, you can still run 24/7 for a month and only have to pay 90 million which saves you over buying ice for a medium POS which costs 180 million a month.
Can the cost of running jobs 12 to 15 jumps from trade hubs really go as high as 100k? If it did, new players would never get into industry and that is not what CCP is going for here by making industry easier to understand but only allowing 10 levels of research over the existing system.
|

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
238
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 21:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Volar Kang wrote:If I had a T2 BPO after these changes I would have it moved to a system with copy slots 12 jumps from a trade hub and make my copies there. Why risk a BPO like this in a POS where you have to pay for and haul ice, log in everyday to check for a wardec and all the other issues with POS's when you can safely make copies in stations away from trade hubs and save a ton over paying for a POS and fuel.
If you run 10 copy jobs for each of your three toons per day AND for some reason the cost for each job averages 100k isk, you can still run 24/7 for a month and only have to pay 90 million which saves you over buying ice for a medium POS which costs 180 million a month.
Can the cost of running jobs 12 to 15 jumps from trade hubs really go as high as 100k? If it did, new players would never get into industry and that is not what CCP is going for here by making industry easier to understand but only allowing 10 levels of research over the existing system.
lol hauling ice
You clearly have no idea how to efficiently run a POS |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2762
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 01:47:00 -
[14] - Quote
Proton Power wrote:While I do understand what you are saying in regards that it is faily safe to copy BPO's in the POS and just take them out "IF" war dec'd.
The issue is that means you can never ever be gone for 25hrs. As an example:
I know Joe Pilot is producing copies of 5 various T2 BPO's in his POS. I watch Joe Pilot, I see when he signs in, out, when does he seem to go away for longer periods of times, does he never log in on Mondays?
I then plan my war dec accordingly, and hit the POS before he knows it was War Dec'd. Once the POS is hit there is nothing he can do to get the BPO's safely except try and protect his POS. The BPO's are locked down in modules that are now offline, so he can't take them out.
Granted this takes some planning, knowledge and not 100%, but its still very doable.
I don't see many T2 BPO owners taking this chance, maybe I am wrong...
Even if you have intel that Joe Pilot owns five BPOs and sells copies of them, I expect what is actually happening is this:
- Joe Pilot runs Industrial Corp #3345 and they have a POS with a single mobile lab and a lot of hardeners/guns/ewar that has no T2 BPOs in it but instead runs much less important jobs - Joanne Pilot runs "Rarr Rarr Pirate Corp" and has a POS 6 jumps away with a single mobile lab, lots of hardeners/guns/ewar that actually does all of the copying for Joe Pilot. There's no in-game way to link these accounts, and while Joanne Pilot's corp has a fairly intimidating name, 'she' never actually makes enemies. - Finally, when Joanne Pilot finishes her copy jobs, she gives the BPCs via untraceable means (safespot jetcanning) to Joanna Pilot, who then gives them to Joe Pilot, so that noone ever notices Joe Pilot and Joanne Pilot spending much time in the same system together.
So all you get if you wardec Industrial Corp #3345 is a chance at looting the Talos BPO that Joe Pilot was copying on the side. Set the universe on fire - then sell the survivors ash. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |

knowsitall
Adeptus iNdustry and Logistics Silent Eviction
22
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 12:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
Proton Power wrote:Not really a buff.
Most T2 BPO Owners produce in POS's for faster run times / factory slots.
With this update not many T2 BPO owners will do this, meaning less production speed. So while they can get a 6% boost and do more work for it, they still lose on what they are getting today in a POS.
So unless im mistaken, which i could be. Would you not just use NPC station (with now infinte copy slots) pay the extra copy installation cost, the installation cost is insignificant compared to the saving of having positive ME against invention output with negative ME.
Then use the BPCs to build in POS exactly as you would now (so still having the production time saving). The main difference is that you can create copy runs faster than you can build. Therefore the volume of commodities that can be created via tech2 BPOs (via copies) is greater than it currently is.
In turn this may move some items that currently the tech 2 BPO owners only account for 60-80% (making the number up for an example) of the demand to the tech 2 BPO owner being able to fill 100% of the demand and therefore killing invention of these commodities.
Knowsitall |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
405
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 13:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
knowsitall wrote:The main difference is that you can create copy runs faster than you can build. Therefore the volume of commodities that can be created via tech2 BPOs (via copies) is greater than it currently is. NPC station speed copy facilities will not produce runs faster than current POS speed manufacturing facilities. Because the POS has a speed bonus (currently at least) and the NPC station does not.
The only way to increase production is to make more runs of copies, which is going to require a POS or an outpost. Both involving some risk.
If you decide to play it safe and keep your T2 BPO in an NPC station, you will be getting a smaller output than you currently can, with increased job costs and a small increase in margin generated by the waste changes.
There is a T2 BPO buff here, but it's only accessible to those that are prepared to take some risks. |

knowsitall
Adeptus iNdustry and Logistics Silent Eviction
22
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 14:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:knowsitall wrote:The main difference is that you can create copy runs faster than you can build. Therefore the volume of commodities that can be created via tech2 BPOs (via copies) is greater than it currently is. NPC station speed copy facilities will not produce runs faster than current POS speed manufacturing facilities. Because the POS has a speed bonus (currently at least) and the NPC station does not. The only way to increase production is to make more runs of copies, which is going to require a POS or an outpost. Both involving some risk. If you decide to play it safe and keep your T2 BPO in an NPC station, you will be getting a smaller output than you currently can, with increased job costs and a small increase in margin generated by the waste changes. There is a T2 BPO buff here, but it's only accessible to those that are prepared to take some risks.
If that is true, and like i said im not a huge expert, then i like that. Increased output for increased risk sounds very fair. Increasing Tech 2 BPO output with no extra risk i would have a problem with.
Knowsitall |

gas guzzler
i'm from the government and i'm here to help
1
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:knowsitall wrote:The main difference is that you can create copy runs faster than you can build. Therefore the volume of commodities that can be created via tech2 BPOs (via copies) is greater than it currently is. NPC station speed copy facilities will not produce runs faster than current POS speed manufacturing facilities. Because the POS has a speed bonus (currently at least) and the NPC station does not. The only way to increase production is to make more runs of copies, which is going to require a POS or an outpost. Both involving some risk. If you decide to play it safe and keep your T2 BPO in an NPC station, you will be getting a smaller output than you currently can, with increased job costs and a small increase in margin generated by the waste changes. There is a T2 BPO buff here, but it's only accessible to those that are prepared to take some risks.
The increase in margin from the waste changes is not small for many BPOs |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
309
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:knowsitall wrote:The main difference is that you can create copy runs faster than you can build. Therefore the volume of commodities that can be created via tech2 BPOs (via copies) is greater than it currently is. NPC station speed copy facilities will not produce runs faster than current POS speed manufacturing facilities. Because the POS has a speed bonus (currently at least) and the NPC station does not. The only way to increase production is to make more runs of copies, which is going to require a POS or an outpost. Both involving some risk. If you decide to play it safe and keep your T2 BPO in an NPC station, you will be getting a smaller output than you currently can, with increased job costs and a small increase in margin generated by the waste changes. There is a T2 BPO buff here, but it's only accessible to those that are prepared to take some risks. You're overlooking the other changes like "Teams". A team with a copy speed bonus will buff T2 BPO copy speed, which combined with the overall speed changes will allow T2 BPO holders to produce more items at zero risk than they do presently. CCP should not be buffing T2 BPOs at all.
MDD |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
432
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 04:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:You're overlooking the other changes like "Teams". I assure you, I'm not overlooking any of the incomming changes.
MailDeadDrop wrote:A team with a copy speed bonus will buff T2 BPO copy speed The current state of the Teams feature will give a maximum of 10% improvement to copy speed if you get the best possible narrow bonus to the exact type of BPO you are using. This will be accompanied by an additional cost for bringing in the team to your system and an additional cost for utilising the team on each appropriate job.
MailDeadDrop wrote:which combined with the overall speed changes The first draft of those changes suggested bringing copy times down to 6.25% under manufacturing times. Negative feedback was received and then it was indicated that this would have to be revised. The fanfest industry panel reinforced this by stating that T2 BPO copying speed would have to be toned back down to avoid all manner of problems.
MailDeadDrop wrote:will allow T2 BPO holders to produce more items at zero risk than they do presently. At present a T2 BPO holder that chooses to efficiently produce at zero risk to their BPO will use a single manufacturing slot in a POS array to produce their product. This will yield a 33% increase in yield (0.75 time) over a current station slot and give them control over slot availability and pricing.
With the first draft changes in place (the ones that will not be shipping, but are all we have to look at) that T2 BPO holder will copy their T2 BPO in station at basic speed, which can then be enhanced by implants (5% max), teams (10% max) and whatever fundamental copy time improvement CCP leave in (6.25% now, likely to be nothing at best on release). All of these bonuses come with a bundle of additional costs and problems.
Thereafter they must produce from the T2 copy in an NPC station or at a POS, both options involve more costs but neither result in increased productivity.
From a T2 BPO owner's perspective, that is not a buff. That is an unknown variance in productivity from current (likely negative, possibly very slightly positive) accompanied by a wide selection of costs, concerns and lost opportunities.
These changes are too complicated and too provisional for it to be worth arguing over. Plus discussing T2 BPOs in general has a habit of bringing out the worst in EVE players, worse even than discussing inflation with a side order of afk cloaking.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
439
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 04:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:will allow T2 BPO holders to produce more items at zero risk than they do presently. At present a T2 BPO holder that chooses to efficiently produce at zero risk to their BPO will use a single manufacturing slot in a POS array to produce their product. This will yield a 33% increase in yield (0.75 time) over a current station slot and give them control over slot availability and pricing. With the first draft changes in place (the ones that will not be shipping, but are all we have to look at) that T2 BPO holder will copy their T2 BPO in station at basic speed, which can then be enhanced by implants (5% max), teams (10% max) and whatever fundamental copy time improvement CCP leave in (6.25% now, likely to be nothing at best on release). All of these bonuses come with a bundle of additional costs and problems. I'm not sure how the maths actually shakes out on the first draft changes. I don't want to get too much into it, as it's rather pointless, but if it works like this:
0.95 x 0.90 x 0.9375 = 0.8015
Then it's a significant nerf when compared to this:
0.75 = 0.75
EDIT:
I think it works more like this:
0.75 (skill) x 0.95 (best implant) x 0.90 (best team) = 0.64125
0.80 (skill) x 0.96 (best implant) x 0.75 (POS array) = 0.576 |

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
417
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 21:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
I like the changes. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3337
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 16:35:00 -
[23] - Quote
Just an FYI, T2 BPOs are going to die. A lot. True story. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
439
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 17:00:00 -
[24] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Just an FYI, T2 BPOs are going to die. A lot. True story. Nothing new there then. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3342
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:25:00 -
[25] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Just an FYI, T2 BPOs are going to die. A lot. True story. Nothing new there then. :p The new part is that CCP themselves have now stated this. Essentially they think that the prices for T2 BPOs are artificially inflated as they are more collectibles than anything else, and the actual profit should be pushed more into the invention side. They did suggest that there would likely be a full removal at some point, but no solid info on when. The amount of sad from the T2 BPO owners in the industry panel was high. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

350125GO
Transcendent Sedition Dustm3n
47
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:43:00 -
[26] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote: The new part is that CCP themselves have now stated this. Essentially they think that the prices for T2 BPOs are artificially inflated as they are more collectibles than anything else, and the actual profit should be pushed more into the invention side. They did suggest that there would likely be a full removal at some point, but no solid info on when. The amount of sad from the T2 BPO owners in the industry panel was high.
What you say in this is contradictory and not based on anything that's verified. Why would CCP care if T2 BPOs are overvalued if they don't have a major impact on the economy. If that's the case they're more of an isk sink than anything and the game needs those to fight inflation. What one Dev said is there are a select number of T2 ships that are underutilized by players and that those markets are somewhat controlled by the T2 BPO owners, but aside from that the BPOs don't really impact the economy or profitability.
One Dev supposedly stated that they "would eventually lose all value" but it was somewhat vague and seemed more in relation to one player's whinging than any actual upcoming changes.
Regardless, they're not going anywhere in the near future, and they're not stomping out competition. I really wish the T2 BPOs are unfair crowd would speak with something other than emotion to try to prove their point.
The person that owns a BPO isn't your biggest competitor since there's likely 30 other manufacturers placing orders on the market. Call it what it is. People complain about T2 BPOs because they think it's unfair that someone can have a slightly higher profit margin than they can.
If someone wants to spend 29B on a missile blueprint and they have the money to do it, let them. It's not going to crash the profitability of the missile market. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
440
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 19:42:00 -
[27] - Quote
350125GO wrote:they're more of an isk sink than anything No, T2 BPOs are not an isk sink in the sense you mean. The isk just passes from player to player and doesn't get removed from the game.
350125GO wrote:and the game needs those to fight inflation. Yes, but fortunately we have enough isk sinks already that inflation isn't a problem. It also appears that CCP aren't shy of adding more.
350125GO wrote:What one Dev said is It must be said that the Devs have yet to prove themselves to be subject matter experts on these things.
350125GO wrote:I really wish the T2 BPOs are unfair crowd would speak with something other than emotion to try to prove their point. The T2 BPO supporting crowd are just as guilty of terrible posting.
I have to agree with you though that there is little good debate to be found on the subject of T2 BPOs. Most of what we do have has the air of monkeys throwing ***** at eachother.
The comments at fanfest are no indication that anything will happen. Just like anything else that is said at fanfest, only some of it will ever see the light of day. Moreso, these comments were vague, non-committal and without any reference to any timescale whatsoever.
Personally, I'd like to see both invention and T2 BPOs iterated upon. I don't feel either should be removed, but I feel both could and should be far better than they are. Of the two, I think invention is the worse feature with one of it's few merits being that it made T2 BPOs work better. |

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
417
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 20:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Just an FYI, T2 BPOs are going to die. A lot. True story.
And eve is dying. Lucas a bit jelly? |

Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
53
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 20:37:00 -
[29] - Quote
About the T2 removal subject.... what if someone helds a 10 yr, eve life long collection of T2 bpo's. Valued a tens of trils... would that be fair?
And dont start with the "lottery argument" as most T2 bpo's have swapped ownership by now. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
339
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 04:19:00 -
[30] - Quote
Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:About the T2 removal subject.... what if someone helds a 10 yr, eve life long collection of T2 bpo's. Valued a tens of trils... would that be fair?
And dont start with the "lottery argument" as most T2 bpo's have swapped ownership by now. fair's got nothing to do with it  |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
229
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 04:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:The amount of sad from the T2 BPO owners in the industry panel was high.
Are you referring to this person?
http://themittani.com/news/fanfest-industry-panel-discussion
Quote:A player told the panel that he had no idea about the upcoming changes when he paid for a particular T2 BPO for 90 billion isk. With the new ME changes, the BPO's value would be 18 billion isk less. In addition, because of the cost of this BPO, it would take him years to pay for it with the profit from it.
Because that sounds like another attempt to make people sell their T2 BPOs cheap by spreading panic, it also makes no sense. .
|

Nanny State
The Conference Elite CODE.
4
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 04:41:00 -
[32] - Quote
350125GO wrote:
Regardless, they're not going anywhere in the near future, and they're not stomping out competition. I really wish the T2 BPOs are unfair crowd would speak with something other than emotion to try to prove their point.
The person that owns a BPO isn't your biggest competitor since there's likely 30 other manufacturers placing orders on the market. Call it what it is. People complain about T2 BPOs because they think it's unfair that someone can have a slightly higher profit margin than they can.
says the t2 bpo owner, it's hilarious how entitled you are. i suggest you use an alt to freighter your stuff from now on |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
446
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 05:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:About the T2 removal subject.... what if someone helds a 10 yr, eve life long collection of T2 bpo's. Valued a tens of trils... would that be fair? I have yet to see a good argument for removing T2 BPOs. To me, the idea of removing something that almost works rather than correcting it's failings seems like idiocy.
In my mind all we need to resolve the actual issues are:
1. A simple means to distribute new, missing or destroyed T2 BPOs to active players through the invention mechanic, while keeping them strictly limited in number.
2. A continuation of the balancing effort so that any T2 products that are really unpopular get fixed. This leading to an increase in use and market volume such that their price gets set by invention rather than T2 BPOs.
3. An iteration on invention mechanics to make them less bad.
4. A willingness to politely ignore the complaints of people who are simply bad at the game and are choosing to blame anything other than themselves for their failings.
As far as I can gather, the only one that isn't already on the table is #1. So I would like to see that added to the agenda for the upcomming invention iteration.
|

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
313
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 13:36:00 -
[34] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:1. A simple means to distribute new, missing or destroyed T2 BPOs to active players through the invention mechanic, while keeping them strictly limited in number. Fixing T2 production issues by making *more* T2 BPOs is going to be a really hard sell.
MDD
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
446
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 14:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:1. A simple means to distribute new, missing or destroyed T2 BPOs to active players through the invention mechanic, while keeping them strictly limited in number. Fixing T2 production issues by making *more* T2 BPOs is going to be a really hard sell. MDD Feel free to tell me what those T2 production issues are. |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
313
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 15:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:1. A simple means to distribute new, missing or destroyed T2 BPOs to active players through the invention mechanic, while keeping them strictly limited in number. Fixing T2 production issues by making *more* T2 BPOs is going to be a really hard sell. Feel free to tell me what those T2 production issues are. I didn't mean to imply *I* thought there were problems. I thought that's what you were proposing to fix. So, what "actual issue" are you proposing to fix with that change?
MDD |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
447
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 16:03:00 -
[37] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:MailDeadDrop wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:1. A simple means to distribute new, missing or destroyed T2 BPOs to active players through the invention mechanic, while keeping them strictly limited in number. Fixing T2 production issues by making *more* T2 BPOs is going to be a really hard sell. Feel free to tell me what those T2 production issues are. I didn't mean to imply *I* thought there were problems. I thought that's what you were proposing to fix. So, what "actual issue" are you proposing to fix with that change? MDD For each of those measures:
1. That the T2 BPO feature has lacked ongoing support from CCP and needs some work.
2. That some T2 stuff is bad.
3. That invention is bad.
4. That people complain a lot, because they are bad.
I must admit, that my measure for #4 isn't as comprehensive as I would like. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3347
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 17:01:00 -
[38] - Quote
350125GO wrote:I really wish the T2 BPOs are unfair crowd would speak with something other than emotion to try to prove their point. lol, that's what you think I am? Not even slightly. I don;t much care wat you choose to spend your isk on. I don't think T2 BPOs should exist as a functional object anymore, sure, but I'm in no way a "they are unfair" kind of player.
Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:About the T2 removal subject.... what if someone helds a 10 yr, eve life long collection of T2 bpo's. Valued a tens of trils... would that be fair?
And dont start with the "lottery argument" as most T2 bpo's have swapped ownership by now. Valued by who? The value placed on T2 BPOs is not reflective of their true market value anyway, so if their marketable value decreases, their player driven price should be unaffected, surely.
The fact is though that as they iterate through invention, T2 BPOs will be phased out of use, so their actual value, as in the value of them as a usable item, will decrease. Whether or not that affects their collectors value is up to player demand, not based on how long it will take to turn a profit. They certainly shouldn't be specifically kept as a better way to manufacture T2 items just because you choose to value them at a ridiculously high value.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
418
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 07:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
Lucas, i like you. You have no idea what you are talking about. However, I like your posts. |

Agata Matahari
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
39
|
Posted - 2014.05.10 09:26:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ok. I just watched the Industrial Panel from Fanfest. One player payed 90bill for an Acolyte II BPO. Everyone who knows a bit about T2 BPO sell prices knows that this is near a scam. Obv one sold this print to the poor fella who manipulated market before. The poor fella cried about his loss on isk and is scared about a removal. CCP Fozzie gives him hope concerning the patch that T2 BPOs will get a nice benefit over the BPCs with negative ME and CCP Greyscale did not say ANY word of removal or nerf. He only lost some words to the rageing player to sooth him. All in all T2 bpos will get better. It's about time cause there is a plenty of worthless T2 bpos. Every single player has the tools in hand for making isk and purchase a Tech2 bpo. Those who are not able to are those who are not trying to discuss objectively and rather show envy. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3355
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 22:34:00 -
[41] - Quote
Big Lynx wrote:Lucas, i like you. You have no idea what you are talking about. However, I like your posts. Lol, good job buddy. Coming from a guy who's joined an alt alliance of a group that you have to use quotes when calling them "mercs" who seem to be specifically set up to smacktalk badly at the CFC, that means next to nothing. If you like to address any specific points, please go right ahead. If not, just move along.
Agata Matahari wrote:CCP Fozzie gives him hope concerning the patch that T2 BPOs will get a nice benefit over the BPCs with negative ME and CCP Greyscale did not say ANY word of removal or nerf. He only lost some words to the rageing player to sooth him. Actually, Greyscale specifically states that their value will go down, and that they have been a problem that has needed a solution for a long time. He also states that they will try not to completely remove them in one hit, and there will be a transitional plan. It clear from this, what's been stated before and how to devs talk about them when you speak to them that they will not be around forever. The current value they have is an collectors value, it's not based on their actual ability to make isk like other BPOs are, so thinking they will maintain or increase in value forever is wishful thinking at best.
Agata Matahari wrote:All in all T2 bpos will get better. It's about time cause there is a plenty of worthless T2 bpos. Every single player has the tools in hand for making isk and purchase a Tech2 bpo. Those who are not able to are those who are not trying to discuss objectively and rather show envy and rage and crying for removal. so ridiculous kindergarden. They won;t get better though. CCP do not want them to exist, and the method for T2 manufacture that will be iterated is invention. With these changes, some of them will slightly increase in production ability through better ME differences, but will decrease without considerably higher risk by placing them in a POS. And you can say that anyone can get them however much you like, the fact is though that they are limited, not designed to exist in the current environment, and they will not exist in a functional state forever. Whether they remove them or stop their ability to produce while leaving them as a collectors item is uncertain, but they will be phased out of use in favour of invention. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
256
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 01:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Lucas give it a rest, no one here is dumb enough to fool for your master's propaganda . .
|

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
418
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 05:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
Hehe. Lucas the knowsitall forum wizard. To the "they will remove t2 bpos" argument: if they wanted to, they could have done it years before. If they do in some point in future eve would have no value for me anymore for two reasons: 1. Ive invested lots of isk in my collection 2. That would be drastic non-logic move. I have another proposal. Plz remove all limited ships because ppl are paying billions of isk for them only to spin them in station. I want one but have not enough isk, so remove them please.
I cant see the "problem" ppl have with t2 bpos. They take about 2% of market economy. The majority of 98% comes from BPCs. Most bpos dont give u a single isk of profit building them. So where is it OP or where is that great problem? |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3355
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 07:26:00 -
[44] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote:Lucas give it a rest, no one here is dumb enough to fool for your master's propaganda  . lol, how is it propaganda? TBH, I don't care. Go on thinking they are going to increase in value forever regardless. When they inevitably drop, which CCP explicitly stated in the industry panel (go check) you'll be the ones crying on here how you're entitled to refunds because you paid way over the odds for you BPOs that take 20 years to turn a profit on.
Big Lynx wrote:Hehe. Lucas the knowsitall forum wizard. To the "they will remove t2 bpos" argument: if they wanted to, they could have done it years before. If they do in some point in future eve would have no value for me anymore for two reasons: 1. Ive invested lots of isk in my collection 2. That would be drastic non-logic move. I have another proposal. Plz remove all limited ships because ppl are paying billions of isk for them only to spin them in station. I want one but have not enough isk, so remove them please. Go watch the videos. Go speak to the devs. Going forward, invention is being iterated, and T2 BPOs will be phased out. You can put your fingers in your ears and say"lalala Lucas is a liar" as much as you want, but it would take you no time at all go watch the industry panel and you'll see they state in there that T2 BPOs have been a problem for a long time they've needed to do something about, that they will do something about it, that they will decrease in value, and that the won't take them away without warning, but will transition them out.
The thing is, this is not new news, this is just the first time they've explicitly stated it. Anyone that thinks that T2 BPOs will continue their upwards spiral of value forever without ever being changed is delusional. Remember, that value is what you guys have placed on it, and nothing to do with it's market value. You can't expect their functional value not to change considering the industry methods they are using avoid their use. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
418
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 08:06:00 -
[45] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Elizabeth Norn wrote:Lucas give it a rest, no one here is dumb enough to fool for your master's propaganda  . lol, how is it propaganda? TBH, I don't care. Go on thinking they are going to increase in value forever regardless. When they inevitably drop, which CCP explicitly stated in the industry panel (go check) you'll be the ones crying on here how you're entitled to refunds because you paid way over the odds for you BPOs that take 20 years to turn a profit on. Big Lynx wrote:Hehe. Lucas the knowsitall forum wizard. To the "they will remove t2 bpos" argument: if they wanted to, they could have done it years before. If they do in some point in future eve would have no value for me anymore for two reasons: 1. Ive invested lots of isk in my collection 2. That would be drastic non-logic move. I have another proposal. Plz remove all limited ships because ppl are paying billions of isk for them only to spin them in station. I want one but have not enough isk, so remove them please. Go watch the videos. Go speak to the devs. Going forward, invention is being iterated, and T2 BPOs will be phased out. You can put your fingers in your ears and say"lalala Lucas is a liar" as much as you want, but it would take you no time at all go watch the industry panel and you'll see they state in there that T2 BPOs have been a problem for a long time they've needed to do something about, that they will do something about it, that they will decrease in value, and that the won't take them away without warning, but will transition them out. The thing is, this is not new news, this is just the first time they've explicitly stated it. Anyone that thinks that T2 BPOs will continue their upwards spiral of value forever without ever being changed is delusional. Remember, that value is what you guys have placed on it, and nothing to do with it's market value. You can't expect their functional value not to change considering the industry methods they are using avoid their use.
I watched the stream, but I think you misunderstood the whole situation there. Greyscale stated those vague formulations (like years before) cause this poor guy (who obv overpaid for an acolyte bpo; possible sale from first moon ;) ) almost started to cry and tremble or fall in a shock. If you have listened carefully, 30sec before, Fozzie encouraged him that his bpo will get more competitive through summer patch because of pos. ME and for his specific drone print, due to drone changes. There are far more important things to change in Eve than T2 bpos. Ccp wont do anything because of one whiner at fanfest who wanted a compensation for his loss because of his own miscalculations. That's utterly ridiculous. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3355
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:09:00 -
[46] - Quote
Big Lynx wrote:I watched the stream, but I think you misunderstood the whole situation there. Greyscale stated those vague formulations (like years before) cause this poor guy (who obv overpaid for an acolyte bpo; possible sale from first moon ;) ) almost started to cry and tremble or fall in a shock. If you have listened carefully, 30sec before, Fozzie encouraged him that his bpo will get more competitive through summer patch because of pos. ME and for his specific drone print, due to drone changes. There are far more important things to change in Eve than T2 bpos. Ccp wont do anything because of one whiner at fanfest who wanted a compensation for his loss because of his own miscalculations. That's utterly ridiculous. lol, if that's the way you want to view it, that's fine, but that's a bit of a "hear what I want to hear" approach. Fozzie states that ME would make them better (which is true, but without putting your BPO in a POS, the overall production value change is down, due to differences in time for production). Greyscale reiterated what has been stated for year, which is that T2 BPOs are not ideal. He also explicitly stated in no uncertain terms that their value will go down. He also stated that they wouldn't remove them without a warning, and spoke of a transition period. That all leads to the conclusion that at some point hey will either stop existing or become non functioning. We spoke to the devs following the panel too, and got the same impression there. At present it can take many years to make back the cost of a T2 BPO, so anyone buying one for profit is gambling on CCP not changing that for at least that length of time.
And no, they won't change it because of one whiner, which is why they won't compensate when they make changes because of that whiner. That doesn't mean that T2 BPOs will continue as is, and it certainly doesn't mean they'll value them at the insanely inflated values that you guys value them at. Like extra materials though, T2 BPOs restrict what changes they are able to make to invention mechanics. Since invention mechanics are here to stay and going forward will be iterated on, they will have to phase T2 BPOs out. They are certainly not going to keep working around them forever just to keep a handful of entitled owners happy.
Honestly, what you invest in I couldn't care less about. If you make a bad call because you'd rather bury your head than listen to what is actually being said, that's your problem. I'll make sure to bookmark this post so I can point you to it in the future though. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
418
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:
.... and it certainly doesn't mean they'll value them at the insanely inflated values that you guys value them at. They are certainly not going to keep working around them forever just to keep a handful of entitled owners happy.
Sounds like you are really jealy. Not a good reason for a T2 Bpo removal. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3355
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 10:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
Big Lynx wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:.... and it certainly doesn't mean they'll value them at the insanely inflated values that you guys value them at. They are certainly not going to keep working around them forever just to keep a handful of entitled owners happy. Sounds like you are really jealy. Not a good reason for a T2 Bpo removal. LOL And we roll right back round to why T2 BPO discussions always go off the track. Because the people who bought T2 BPOs automatically assume that everyone else must just be jealous. We all must just be peasants right? We simply can't afford that few billion to get into the T2 market? What are you smoking? You aren't in some exclusive club, you've just bought a few items, that's all. I don't sit around saying "Oh lord, I wish I could afford T2 BPOs". If I wanted them, I'd buy them, but they simply aren't worth the investment. It would just be sunk capital that takes years to become profitable.
And no, the reason for T2 BPO removal is that invention changes are restricted due to the existence of T2 BPOs. It was suggested to separate the two out so T2 BPOs and the invented BPCs don't affect each other, but CCP stated that they wouldn't work around the issue like that. Looking at it the other way, do you think that the fact that you guys paid inflated prices for the BPOs and didn't take into account devaluation is enough of a reason to not remove them?
By the way, I'm not here campaigning for their removal. I don't particularly care about how people want to produce their T2s, so the BPO vs invention argument is not something I care to be involved in (though the more I see you guys kicking and screaming about it, the more I look forward to the explosion of rage when they do make a change). But CCP have made it clear where they stand, and that is with invention which will be iterated. So by all means keep stamping your feet and telling me how jealy I must be, but that wont change what will inevitably come to pass. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Hemmo Paskiainen
448
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 12:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
I am so happy that i sold my collection a year ago. I am litterly giggling on the flour due all these entertaining tears here. Hahaha  CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS
[url]http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9679/whatihavedoneineve.jpg[/url] |

Scratchy Nutz
Republic University Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 12:42:00 -
[50] - Quote
I don't have t2 blueprint, but all what I can read here is acute verbal diarrhea. On the top, Lucas kell. |

flakeys
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
2152
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 13:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
Scratchy Nutz wrote:IB4L I don't have t2 blueprint, but all what I can read here is acute verbal diarrhea. On the top, Lucas kell. here for all "experts": https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4549454#post4549454"When and how T II BPO's will be removed and if, how or in what form owners will be compensated is not known. CCP will make that information public if and when they decide it is time to do so. Until then, any thread on it can only be based on speculation. Hence, thread locked."
But then we are in the market discussion forum , wich besides loans IS all about speculative talk ...
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3360
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 13:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
Scratchy Nutz wrote:IB4L I don't have t2 blueprint, but all what I can read here is acute verbal diarrhea. On the top, Lucas kell. here for all "experts": https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4549454#post4549454"When and how T II BPO's will be removed and if, how or in what form owners will be compensated is not known. CCP will make that information public if and when they decide it is time to do so. Until then, any thread on it can only be based on speculation. Hence, thread locked." Oh no... My feels...
As flakeys said, this is pretty much what this forum is for. Discussion of changes that are potentially in the works and could affect market prices is a bit part of the forum. Now I don't much care if you want to read what I write or if you want to act on it. If you want to spend all of your isk on T2 BPOs, go right ahead, that's your choice. The guys that think T2 BPOs are going to increase in value, best of luck to them in their endeavors.
I'll stick with what I see though, which is that a huge change is coming to industry which opens up the opportunity for change (especially when they work on invention mechanics). Combine that with their specific mention of a reduction in value for T2 BPOs as well as a the vague comments that the status quo of T2 BPOs needs to and will change. None of that screams "good news for T2 BPOs". The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

350125GO
Transcendent Sedition Dustm3n
47
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 14:17:00 -
[53] - Quote
Well Lucas, we all have to thank you for your truly altruistic posts, letting everyone know of the coming changes. Anyone committing this much time to speculation has a horse in the race. What's yours? |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3360
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 14:43:00 -
[54] - Quote
350125GO wrote:Well Lucas, we all have to thank you for your truly altruistic posts, letting everyone know of the coming changes. Anyone committing this much time to speculation has a horse in the race. What's yours? Sometimes people just discuss stuff, you know? Doesn't mean we are all sitting here scheming. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7370
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 18:02:00 -
[55] - Quote
Scratchy Nutz wrote:IB4L I don't have t2 blueprint, but all what I can read here is acute verbal diarrhea. On the top, Lucas kell. here for all "experts": https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4549454#post4549454"When and how T II BPO's will be removed and if, how or in what form owners will be compensated is not known. CCP will make that information public if and when they decide it is time to do so. Until then, any thread on it can only be based on speculation. Hence, thread locked." The announcement was made at the industry roundtable, which I can only assume ISD didn't watch. However, that's now avalible on youtube so anyone can go see for themselves.
You can also just look at the flood of bpos on the sell order forum as well to see the rats fleeing the ship Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7374
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 20:45:00 -
[56] - Quote
indeed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTTyMhSKY9E
skip to 22:20
"i think we've been fairly consistently, publically of the opinion that we need to do something with t2 bpos for some time, I hope that's being taken into account in market prices..."
"...that value is going to go down in the future..."
good luck with the "this is all just a goonie lie" thing Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3024
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 21:18:00 -
[57] - Quote
The new T2 BPO will be the 10/10 BPO's in capital ships. Wonder who will have a bunch of those? Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3364
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 21:50:00 -
[58] - Quote
What? That makes very little sense. Are you saying that once T2s go, the new best BPOs will be capital ones? And the answer is everyone can have them. They are NPC sold, and with the new changes you'll actually be able to research them in high sec without having to pay hundreds of millions per month for a POS. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7382
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 23:11:00 -
[59] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:The new T2 BPO will be the 10/10 BPO's in capital ships. Wonder who will have a bunch of those? supercap ones
nobody ever bothered getting ME10 on a supercap bpo, that was insane
but certain individuals in certain RMT cabals might have supercap bpos that are heavily researched and would round up to nicely high levels Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1318

|
Posted - 2014.05.13 11:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The Rules: 11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
418
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 15:08:00 -
[61] - Quote
@ Lucas Troll
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4587658#post4587658
Looking forward to the buff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3372
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 18:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
We'll see. There were no plans to scrap WoD either, 2 days before they announced the scrapping of WoD. What CCP say to cut rumours can differ wildly from fact. And either way, it was stated that they will lose value and they will be doing something about them. Go nuts though and spend all your isk on them if you really want to buddy. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

350125GO
Transcendent Sedition Dustm3n
50
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:14:00 -
[63] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:We'll see. There were no plans to scrap WoD either, 2 days before they announced the scrapping of WoD.
Somehow I don't think T2 BPOs are the same as a multi-million dollar write down that impacted 90 employees with real life families.
Keep reachin' for the stars... |

Dramaticus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
551
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:22:00 -
[64] - Quote
Hey look at that T2 BPOs are already getting a slight nerf, thanks Greyscale! The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal
The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them |

Zor Iwaira
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 19:41:00 -
[65] - Quote
Dramaticus wrote:Hey look at that T2 BPOs are already getting a slight nerf, thanks Greyscale!
Dude... your leaders "Weasel" and "Mymma" are spreading the false rumor that they will be removed, not nerfed. Please keep yourself up to date on the current market manipulation attempts of your puppetmasters. Thank you! |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3373
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 20:58:00 -
[66] - Quote
Zor Iwaira wrote:Dramaticus wrote:Hey look at that T2 BPOs are already getting a slight nerf, thanks Greyscale! Dude... your leaders "Weasel" and "Mymma" are spreading the false rumor that they will be removed, not nerfed. Please keep yourself up to date on the current market manipulation attempts of your puppetmasters. Thank you! Actually, it's that they will decrease in value, with the inevitable aim of being removed from the production line. By the way, I think the nerf he is talking about is:CCP Greyscale wrote:We are currently of a mind to shift invented BPCs so they have positive (or at worst 0) ME and TE figures. This a) prevents the removal of extra materials giving invention an extra-hard kick, and in particular b) prevents every invented T2 item from requiring two of the relevant T1 items (due to always rounding up materials). This will probably put all invented BPCs in the 1-5% ME/2-10% TE range, with decryptors adjusted to match. We may adjust T2 build costs upwards across the board to put the net T2 resource usage roughly where it is currently, so we don't end up nerfing the demand for T2 components. (This obviously also serves to close the gap somewhat between invention and T2 BPOs; this is not a goal here but it's an acceptable side-effect.)
We are going to unify ME and TE per-level research times on all blueprints. Currently it looks like most T2 and capital BPOs have different TE and ME times. We're planning on kicking T2 BPO times up to the higher of the two values, and capital ones down to the lower of the two. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |

Big Lynx
Do you even Exist. Darwins Lemmings
419
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 21:45:00 -
[67] - Quote
Cool. I kinda like that. They are narrowing the gap but T2 bpos will remain in game as a legitimate part and aint get removed. And they keep their advantage. So I am going on to invest my trillions of isk in those prints. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3374
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 22:23:00 -
[68] - Quote
Big Lynx wrote:Cool. I kinda like that. They are narrowing the gap but T2 bpos will remain in game as a legitimate part and aint get removed. And they keep their advantage. So I am going on to invest my trillions of isk in those prints.  Heh, for now . It will mean the margins are likely to shrink however as the BPOs won't have such an aggressive lead. You're likely to need to rik them in a POS to make the most out of them. Considering they already take many years to turn profit, ones bought now may never do so. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |