Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
25581
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 18:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:I don't think that's unfair. Why would it be?
How do you quantify unfair anyway?
You know what's unfair?
My face!
Indeed.
DMC
Faction Standing Repair Plan | California Eve Players | (Proposal) Bring Back 'The Endless Battle' Missions |
Marsha Mallow
398
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 18:53:00 -
[32] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:You know what's unfair?
My face! That lipstick I'm reporting you to the CSM for making my eyes bleed. I feel violated.
You're indisgrace btw. You made me log in an alt to check Jita TiDi on Friday then screamed "Who are you and why are you convoing me" lol. Was a bit scary. I was a bit tipsy by that point and hynotised by local so went to bed.
My neocom was fine btw :P If you feel violated, harassed, tormented, just a bit emo - please send a letter to the CSM of the people, our beloved Ripard Teg. He will avenge you in his chariot-blog which is immune to the rules we are on the Eve-O websites, via clever utilisation of the rhetorical technique known as 'the harangue'. Demi-god. Angel. Superhero. Callsign #TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
722
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 18:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:I would support it to but omg the level of crying that would insue would shut down the interwebs.
I guess there would be some kind of distress, yes .
Jenn aSide wrote:I can't remember which DEV it was but I remember clearly that he said they talked extensivley about doing that (incursion rats on gates, along with other things like disabling CONCORD in incursions constellations) and decided against it when developing Incursions. Thus we have high sec incursions where CONCORD and the npc navies won't fight the people puportedly invading sovereign space but that will still shoot the crap out of a capsuleer who fires a civilian gatling gun at someone. Back in 2010, when all that started and people didn't know, how to handle incursions, I would agree.
But they are just being farmed in 2014 and deserve some iteration. Remove insurance. |
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
167
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 18:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
*snif* naw brah, this game is too hard mang *snif* scramblers too stronk, ignorance very high *snif snif* I can't do this mang. I've got to have my quick action dodges and rolls else this game sucks like EA mang. No moar rats mang, please brah. I can't do this anymore brah. This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165 |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
6229
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 18:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Well, not much sympathy for the Devil here. You must of been sitting there or traveling really slow to have NPC's target and warp scram you at the gate. NPC's are much slower on the trigger compared to actual players and most players when traveling will warp to 0 anyway. Sounds like the new AI has beat you at your own game. DMC
This is not true, Incursion NPCs on a gate can isnsta-scram (no difference whether low or null). It's like flying through a player gate camp where they are remote sensor boosting somone. Incursion rats are the reason I fit a couple warp core stabs to mu nullfied travel fit Tech3s when i need to pass through, I've had 2 instances of being scrammed by rats coming out of gate-cloak even though I wasn't slow to engage my ship's covert cloak.
To date I have yet to have that happen when passing though a 'real person' gate camp in a covert. |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
881
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 18:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Glad we all agree on something.
I'll spread a few more posts around and change it tomorrow ...
There's a cup of hot peppermint tea right next to me ... <3
And who is the first to make a thread in F&I about rats scrambling in HS? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4492860 Killmails for Wrecks!! Ganker tears, best tears! And how do I put text as links into signatures?? |
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
723
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 19:02:00 -
[37] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:There's a cup of hot peppermint tea right next to me ... <3 This sounds promising. And like a good idea. I'm off going to make me some too . Remove insurance. |
Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3024
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 19:10:00 -
[38] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Well, not much sympathy for the Devil here. You must of been sitting there or traveling really slow to have NPC's target and warp scram you at the gate. NPC's are much slower on the trigger compared to actual players and most players when traveling will warp to 0 anyway. Sounds like the new AI has beat you at your own game. DMC
Incursion rats actually have a super-fast lock time. Frigates and interceptors get through fine, anything else needs to be warping cloaked or doing the MWD trick.
As someone posted above, they are meant to be highly disruptive. The only reason there is no highsec equivalent to this is because the tears would put Iceland under water. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9459
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 19:51:00 -
[39] - Quote
PVP should be able to interfere with PVE, but it really shouldn't work the other way around. CCP feels differently. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3676
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 19:52:00 -
[40] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:PVP should be able to interfere with PVE, but it really shouldn't work the other way around.
No to gate guns, CONCORD, faction police, navy?
Not trolling just putting that out there :) *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|
Salvos Rhoska
1192
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 19:55:00 -
[41] - Quote
If this was about any other game, I would agree with you.
But in EVE, little random inconsistencies like this create content. ------------ |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9459
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 19:57:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:PVP should be able to interfere with PVE, but it really shouldn't work the other way around. No to gate guns, CONCORD, faction police, navy? Not trolling just putting that out there :) None of these mechanics are similar, though. They don't penalize players in an attempt to force them into completing an objective. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|
Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3676
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 20:00:00 -
[43] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:PVP should be able to interfere with PVE, but it really shouldn't work the other way around. No to gate guns, CONCORD, faction police, navy? Not trolling just putting that out there :) None of these mechanics are similar, though. They don't penalize players in an attempt to force them into completing an objective.
No I understand, thats cool, I was just going on the raw basics of the PVE not interfering with PVP comment.
But I get your meaning. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9459
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 20:04:00 -
[44] - Quote
I'm not even really sure I'd consider those PVE. Those things don't provide you with PVE objectives. They're really more like obstacles and terrain. PVE would be things like rats, missions, incursions, etc. Something you get some benefit from killing. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|
Jur Tissant
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 20:08:00 -
[45] - Quote
Sorry about the loss but that's part of going through low-sec. To avoid this you can
- check the map once/twice a day to see where incursions are - fit warp core stabs if you're just travelling - MWD/cloak trick
I've made it past several incursion gates in low-sec flying a hauler. MWD/cloak is tough to beat. |
Kuronaga
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
247
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 20:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
Disclaimer: PvE can happen anytime, anywhere. |
Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
579
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 21:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
I like incursions dangerous..... not less dangerous. -á-á- remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not-á "afk" cloaking-á-
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
280
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 21:13:00 -
[48] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:, along with other things like disabling CONCORD in incursions constellations) and decided against it when developing Incursions.
''A Sansha incursion is occurring in this sector millions are dying or being enslaved, Concord are overwhelmed, well not really, they'll still find time in their busy scheduled to slaughter you for target painting a Retriever or repping a Sansha Rat.''. Non-sense CCP automated announcement when entering a high sec incursion. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1281
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 23:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:PVP should be able to interfere with PVE, but it really shouldn't work the other way around. CCP feels differently. Entitlement complex much? "My way of playing is superior to yours, so I get to trample on you, but your way of playing can't ever affect me".
EVE is a world. Some parts of it are even slightly alive. Deal with it. The reason High sec remains as is with regards to concord is because otherwise incursions would be used to replicate MOO's behaviour back when concord was tankable. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10560
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 23:24:00 -
[50] - Quote
What they should do is extend that to highsec, not remove it from other parts of space. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |
|
Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
40
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 23:30:00 -
[51] - Quote
I never really understood the spawning of rats on gates at all in low sec, i mean gate guns why you no work? |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5458
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 23:35:00 -
[52] - Quote
TL;DR:
Didn't travel fit. Lost a ship... to rats. Shame merits nerfing something. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1283
|
Posted - 2014.04.27 23:36:00 -
[53] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:I never really understood the spawning of rates on gates at all in low sec, i mean gate guns why you no work? What would be nice would be if gate guns engaged, but the sansha could tank them. So that they are much easier to kill as their reps are used up on the gate guns, so any damage will build up over time. That creates the image of gate guns being effective, while not eliminating the sansha unless players do so themselves. |
Ammzi
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
1732
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 00:00:00 -
[54] - Quote
TWSinc wrote:
I find it upsetting. I may be a "crybaby" for complaining but is my thoughts understandable even a lil bit? :/
No. |
Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1101
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 00:44:00 -
[55] - Quote
There are differences between incursion in the various sectors of space.
You found one of the big ones. The other being the payout multipliers.
No, I think things are working as intended.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10561
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 02:48:00 -
[56] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:You found one of the big ones. The other being the payout multipliers.
And the other big one being that hisec incursion running is essentially risk-free Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
637
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 03:11:00 -
[57] - Quote
Do they actually scram or just warp disrupt ? |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
6373
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 05:00:00 -
[58] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:Do they actually scram or just warp disrupt ? Disrupt. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5464
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 05:01:00 -
[59] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Hasikan Miallok wrote:Do they actually scram or just warp disrupt ? Disrupt.
Critically, this allows you to activate a Micro Jump Drive. This is rather an important distinction. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
1406
|
Posted - 2014.04.28 10:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Insert EVE easy-mode button here >*< Personnel Division Director - Bene Gesserit Chapterhouse-á CEO - Sanctuary Pact Alliance
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |