| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Capqu
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
471
   |
Posted - 2014.04.29 13:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
what about the (rather huge) nerf to blops that use their cargo for extra fuel? same with dreads? same with carriers and fleet hangars?
could you instead of changing fuel bay size consider reducing fuel size by 33%
edit: nvm literally everyone else already said the same thing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
Capqu
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
471
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 13:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Resgo wrote:Rather than increasing the size of fuel bays, why not cut the volume of the isotyopes by a third. Then it would carry through all of your systems using the isotopes at fuel. It wouldn't have an impact on POSes as POSes consume fuel blocks that would stay the same size. At first glance this appears to be an excellent idea. Cutting isotope volume allows people to fit more fuel into non-fuel bays, which you may or may not want to do.
more fuel but same range as current
aka exactly what ccp want
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
Capqu
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
471
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
i wish you'd stop trying to apply band-aid fixes to power projection and address the actual issues tho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
Capqu
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
471
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
BadAssMcKill wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:We're going to go ahead and use Resgo's suggestion. Instead of the increase in fuel bay size we will decrease the volume of isotopes by 1/3. OP updated. Do you actually think things through before you post or what
reported
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
Capqu
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
471
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
ZehNarume wrote:MissBolyai wrote:ZehNarume wrote:MissBolyai wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:For reference, this will increase the cost of running a max skilled Rhea from Jita to RIT-A7 (jump drive transit the whole way) from ~50m isk to ~75m isk. I appreciate this explanation for those who cannot grasp what a 50% increase would look like numerically. For those that cannot grasp this, here's a chart: Old jump cost (in millions)New jump cost (in millions) 11.5 23 34.5 46 57.5 69 710.5 812 913.5 1015 1116.5 1218 1319.5 1421 1522.5 1624 1725.5 1827 1928.5 2030 2131.5 2233 2334.5 2436 2537.5 2639 2740.5 2842 2943.5 3045 3146.5 3248 3349.5 3451 3552.5 3654 3755.5 3857 3958.5 4060 4161.5 4263 4364.5 4466 4567.5 4669 4770.5 4872 4973.5 5075 5176.5 5278 5379.5 5481 5582.5 5684 5785.5 5887 5988.5 6090 6191.5 6293 6394.5 6496 6597.5 6699 67100.5 68102 69103.5 70105 71106.5 72108 73109.5 74111 75112.5 76114 77115.5 78117 79118.5 80120 81121.5 82123 83124.5 84126 85127.5 86129 87130.5 88132 89133.5 90135 91136.5 92138 93139.5 94141 95142.5 96144 97145.5 98147 99148.5 100150 101151.5 102153 103154.5 104156 105157.5 106159 107160.5 108162 109163.5 110165 111166.5 112168 113169.5 114171 115172.5 116174 117175.5 118177 119178.5 120180 121181.5 122183 123184.5 124186 125187.5 126189 127190.5 128192 129193.5 130195 131196.5 132198 133199.5 134201 135202.5 136204 137205.5 138207 139208.5 140210 141211.5 142213 143214.5 144216 145217.5 146219 147220.5 148222 149223.5 150225 151226.5 152228 153229.5 154231 155232.5 156234 157235.5 158237 159238.5 160240 161241.5 162243 163244.5 164246 165247.5 166249 167250.5 168252 169253.5 170255 171256.5 172258 173259.5 174261 175262.5 176264 177265.5 178267 179268.5 180270 181271.5 182273 183274.5 184276 185277.5 186279 187280.5 188282 189283.5 190285 191286.5 192288 193289.5 194291 195292.5 196294 197295.5 198297 199298.5 200300 201301.5 202303 203304.5 204306 205307.5 206309 207310.5 208312 209313.5 210315 211316.5 212318 213319.5 214321 215322.5 216324 217325.5 218327 219328.5 220330 221331.5 222333 223334.5 224336 225337.5 226339 227340.5 228342 229343.5 230345 231346.5 232348 233349.5 234351 235352.5 236354 237355.5 238357 239358.5 240360 241361.5 242363 243364.5 244366 245367.5 246369 247370.5 248372 249373.5 250375 251376.5 252378 253379.5 254381 255382.5 256384 257385.5 258387 259388.5 260390 261391.5 262393 263394.5 264396 265397.5 266399 267400.5 268402 269403.5 I don't quite understand, can you give some more numerical values from 270 on wards? Sure... 270405 271406.5 272408 273409.5 274411 275412.5 276414 277415.5 278417 279418.5 280420 281421.5 282423 283424.5 284426 285427.5 286429 287430.5 288432 289433.5 290435 291436.5 292438 293439.5 294441 295442.5 296444 297445.5 298447 299448.5 300450 301451.5 302453 303454.5 304456 305457.5 306459 307460.5 308462 309463.5 310465 311466.5 312468 313469.5 314471 315472.5 316474 317475.5 318477 319478.5 320480 321481.5 322483 323484.5 324486 325487.5 326489 327490.5 328492 329493.5 330495 331496.5 332498 333499.5 334501 335502.5 336504 337505.5 338507 339508.5 340510 341511.5 342513 343514.5 344516 345517.5 346519 347520.5 348522 349523.5 350525 351526.5 352528 353529.5 354531 355532.5 356534 357535.5 358537 359538.5 360540 361541.5 362543 363544.5 364546 365547.5 366549 367550.5 368552 369553.5 370555 371556.5 372558 373559.5 374561 375562.5 376564 377565.5 378567 379568.5 380570 381571.5 382573 383574.5 384576 385577.5 386579 387580.5 388582 389583.5 390585 391586.5 392588 393589.5 394591 395592.5 396594 397595.5 398597 399598.5 400600 401601.5 402603 403604.5 404606 405607.5 406609 407610.5 408612 409613.5 410615 411616.5 412618 413619.5 414621 415622.5 416624 417625.5 418627 419628.5 420630 421631.5 422633 423634.5 424636 425637.5 426639 427640.5 428642 429643.5 430645 431646.5 432648 433649.5 434651 435652.5 436654 437655.5 438657 439658.5 440660 441661.5 442663 443664.5 444666 445667.5 446669 447670.5 448672 449673.5 450675 451676.5 452678 Thanks for clarifying, you are a good man.
yea pretty straightforward now thx
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
Capqu
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
471
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
Querns wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:We're going to go ahead and use Resgo's suggestion. Instead of the increase in fuel bay size we will decrease the volume of isotopes by 1/3. OP updated. Thinking on this, there's one outlier -- jump bridges. You may want to go forward with actually increasing the bay size on this, as messing with the volume of LO3 has some hilarious knockbacks related to cynos that you probably don't want. (Non-expanded interceptor cynos, anyone?)
isotopes aren't liquid ozone you dumb GOON
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
Capqu
Love Squad
Pasta Syndicate
473
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Querns wrote:Capqu wrote:Querns wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:We're going to go ahead and use Resgo's suggestion. Instead of the increase in fuel bay size we will decrease the volume of isotopes by 1/3. OP updated. Thinking on this, there's one outlier -- jump bridges. You may want to go forward with actually increasing the bay size on this, as messing with the volume of LO3 has some hilarious knockbacks related to cynos that you probably don't want. (Non-expanded interceptor cynos, anyone?) isotopes aren't liquid ozone you dumb GOON Uh, yeah, but he said they aren't increasing bay sizes any more. I'm saying still do it for the Jump Bridge. Gosh.
how should i know how jump bridges work u took our fuckin sov
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
| |
|