| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
692
   |
Posted - 2014.04.29 19:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Hello everyone!
[b]The plan for this release is to start with a 50% increase in the fuel cost of all jump drives and jump portals, and adjust further if necessary once we see the results. This change applies both the the base consumption of ship based jump drives, as well as the isotope consumption per kg of mass on all jump bridges and portals.
On rare ocassions, CCP come up with a half-sensible idea. Its a shame that they are far outweighed by the idiotic and dim-witted ones such as this.
God. |
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
694
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 09:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jena Jamson wrote:Don't you see all the negative responses here?
WE DONT WANT IT!
CCP LISTEN TO YOUR PLAYER BASE WHO ACTUALLY PLAYS THE GAME!
Think back over the last few years....
When have CCP EVER listened to the player base...they may make a few cosmetic changes to give the impression that they listen, but in reality they really do not give a sh!t what we think.
They have a fancy idea that some idiot dreamt up (probably while drunk, as no-one can come up with dopey ideas like this otherwise) and will bring it in regardless of what anyone says.
I have long since given up providing feedback on the test forums, as it is completely pointless. I donGÇÖt even bother looking at it anymore as it is totally irrelevant.
So, save your breath, they are going to do it anyway.
|
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
694
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 11:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:
Use normal freighters. JF shouldn't even be in the game.
They already are. If you don't know how or why do some research before making idiotic comments. |
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
697
|
Posted - 2014.04.30 14:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:This is the real reason why.
Bloobs are using Archon fleets.
Lets assume that r64 moon is owned right now by a bloob.
Let it be close, very close to staging point , only 1 midpoint , around 30 LY so all carriers at lvl V calibration can jump.
Currently amarr isotopes is expensive , but it will be more so lets assume 1.5k per isotope.
Lets think about smaller fleet just 100 archons that have to make this trip.
This will give us 20,500 isotopes in only one way after this change - so this will be around 4.100.000 isotopes for this whole fleet to be moved in both directions.
Simple math : 4.100.000 * 1.500 = 6.150.000.000 per trip to save one r64 tower.
This is way more than this tower will earn you in month , and locals can ref it again day after.
This is what all big blobs are terrified that all their income will be consumed by fuel costs.
If this change will be connected to direct pos jump bridge changes , and increase in cost of titan bridges then all smaller alliances , lowsec people will be able to take poses that are in area where they are living.
Big coalitions will have rethink what is realy worth to defend - when they spend 8bil a month to defend pos that will give them 2-3bil of income per month.
LOL, you really have no idea, do you ? |
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
698
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 17:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Part of the reason I posted this before Fanfest is so that we could take advantage of all the feedback possible, but that also means that we'll be a bit slower replying to threads for the next couple days. Rest assured that we'll make it up to you next week, and we're not forgetting about this thread.
TRANSLATION:
We posted this CR4P at this time hoping that the hype over Fanfest would put it at the back of people's minds and help them to forget what a complete pile of **** it is.
Oh, and just like in the past, we are bringing it in anyway, regardless of any negative feed back.... which we will ignore completely and just highlight one or two posts that think its an awesome idea.
|
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
701
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 22:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: Where some companies would reject such an improvement just to appear stronger or more decisive, we're very proud of our willingness to embrace player ideas.
Excellent news....so you will not be going ahead with this dumb idea then ?
|
| |
|