|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
574
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 22:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Kern Walzky wrote:its a dam shame that all Capitals now get a nerf... increase in fuel consumtion is ok, but you really need to be able to carry the amount required to jump as before.
i vote for bigger Fuel bays !!! I think the change in isotope size was meant to counteract that. So with the new values your traveling range is the same as before. |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
728
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 02:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Jaari Val'Dara wrote:I feel obliged to complain. Black ops has insanely small fuel bay, increasing fuel costs, but not decreasing fuel volume enough will make black ops fleets even less viable. If you know what's good for eve, buff black ops fuel bay, to at least 3 or 4 thousand m^3. They probably already have plans fro black ops changes on the tiercide pass, so might be irrelevant to make these adjustments now. The only ships still m,issing from tiercide are Recons, T3, Black ops and capitals if memory serves me right. what, no shuttle pass? no love, seriously... |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
748
|
Posted - 2014.06.09 18:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Any plans on adding implants to reduce fuel usage? |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
796
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 19:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
at this rate, theyre will be higher supply of fuel-grade tears to use on my jump drive |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
947
|
Posted - 2014.07.10 06:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
I recall something mentioned about lowslot mods for JFs in the freighter change thread. Is this still going on and will it make it time for crius if so? |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
1022
|
Posted - 2014.07.21 20:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alyssa Haginen wrote:Where are the low slot fuel conservation modules that were coming with this change?
Some people seem to think your fuel capacity will increase after this update which is not true.
50% increase in fuel use minus a 33% decrease in fuel volume equals a 17% loss to your fuel capacity.
Again
50 - 33 = 17% loss overall range/storage.
One more thing it does is ruins the covert jump portal because it will take 3/4 tank of fuel to jump one plate fit recon. Omg dat math doe
Seriously go back to your high school records and double check the name on your diploma.
E: in the spirit of not being TOO much of an a**hole here's the correct formula
For ease of use we'll pretend 100 isotopes takes up 100m3 and also assume that is a full cargo.
100x1.5 (fuel coat increase) = 150 150x.66 (size reduction) = 99 (if you use .66 continuous then it rounds up to 100 properly) |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
1054
|
Posted - 2014.07.24 02:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Hey guys. I'm doing some design work on the fuel conservation modules this week and we expect they should be ready for the Hyperion release (coming up next).
I'll be posting a new feedback thread for them as soon as we're a little further. Sweet |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
1062
|
Posted - 2014.07.25 05:00:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:Gaijin Lanis wrote:AtomicGrog wrote:Obviously excepting the caps that cant dock... Whats wrong with keeping conservation modules off super-capitals and titans completely? As has been mentioned over and over (and over) in this thread, the cost to jump is completely out of line with the mass/volume of a ship. Compared to what? Carrier 1,500 isotopes per 6.5 LY Titan 1,500 isotopes per 3.5 LY Moving a Titan the same distance as a carrier, will cost you nearly 50% more isotopes. A titan is twice the mass/volume of a carrier. Seems balanced to me. Nope. Those numbers are per lightyear. Little tooltip even says so. The only ships with more than 1500/LY are jump freighter coming in at 4100-4400/LY. The lightest titan (Ragnarok) is 2.16 times bigger in mass than the heaviest JF (Rhea), but uses 66% less fuel at base numbers. |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
1093
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 23:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Rowells wrote:Nope. Those numbers are per lightyear. Little tooltip even says so. Where is this tooltip you're talking about? Hover the cursor over the jump fuel requirement in the info tab. |
|
|
|