| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

iskflakes
908
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 13:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Supercapitals which have to store fuel in their fleet hangars because their fuel bays are too limited will get hit pretty hard by this. - |

iskflakes
908
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 13:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
WarFireV wrote:Rip dreads.
Apart from the increased price they benefit from this, they will just get more stront for equivalent jump distance. - |

iskflakes
910
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 13:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Resgo wrote:Rather than increasing the size of fuel bays, why not cut the volume of the isotyopes by a third. Then it would carry through all of your systems using the isotopes at fuel. It wouldn't have an impact on POSes as POSes consume fuel blocks that would stay the same size.
This is a good solution.
+50% usage -1/3rd volume - |

iskflakes
910
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
MissBolyai wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:For reference, this will increase the cost of running a max skilled Rhea from Jita to RIT-A7 (jump drive transit the whole way) from ~50m isk to ~75m isk. I appreciate this explanation for those who cannot grasp what a 50% increase would look like numerically. For those that cannot grasp this, here's a chart: Old jump cost (in millions)New jump cost (in millions) 11.5 23 34.5 46 57.5 69 710.5 812 913.5 1015 1116.5 1218 1319.5 1421 1522.5 1624 1725.5 1827 1928.5 2030 2131.5 2233 2334.5 2436 2537.5 2639 2740.5 2842 2943.5 3045 3146.5 3248 3349.5 3451 3552.5 3654 3755.5 3857 3958.5 4060 4161.5 4263 4364.5 4466 4567.5 4669 4770.5 4872 4973.5 5075 5176.5 5278 5379.5 5481 5582.5 5684 5785.5 5887 5988.5 6090 6191.5 6293 6394.5 6496 6597.5 6699 67100.5 68102 69103.5 70105 71106.5 72108 73109.5 74111 75112.5 76114 77115.5 78117 79118.5 80120 81121.5 82123 83124.5 84126 85127.5 86129 87130.5 88132 89133.5 90135 91136.5 92138 93139.5 94141 95142.5 96144 97145.5 98147 99148.5 100150 101151.5 102153 103154.5 104156 105157.5 106159 107160.5 108162 109163.5 110165 111166.5 112168 113169.5 114171 115172.5 116174 117175.5 118177 119178.5 120180 121181.5 122183 123184.5 124186 125187.5 126189 127190.5 128192 129193.5 130195 131196.5 132198 133199.5 134201 135202.5 136204 137205.5 138207 139208.5 140210 141211.5 142213 143214.5 144216 145217.5 146219 147220.5 148222 149223.5 150225 151226.5 152228 153229.5 154231 155232.5 156234 157235.5 158237 159238.5 160240 161241.5 162243 163244.5 164246 165247.5 166249 167250.5 168252 169253.5 170255 171256.5 172258 173259.5 174261 175262.5 176264 177265.5 178267 179268.5 180270 181271.5 182273 183274.5 184276 185277.5 186279 187280.5 188282 189283.5 190285 191286.5 192288 193289.5 194291 195292.5 196294 197295.5 198297 199298.5 200300 201301.5 202303 203304.5 204306 205307.5 206309 207310.5 208312 209313.5 210315 211316.5 212318 213319.5 214321 215322.5 216324 217325.5 218327 219328.5 220330 221331.5 222333 223334.5 224336 225337.5 226339 227340.5 228342 229343.5 230345 231346.5 232348 233349.5 234351 235352.5 236354 237355.5 238357 239358.5 240360 241361.5 242363 243364.5 244366 245367.5 246369 247370.5 248372 249373.5 250375 251376.5 252378 253379.5 254381 255382.5 256384 257385.5 258387 259388.5 260390 261391.5 262393 263394.5 264396 265397.5 266399 267400.5 268402 269403.5
Fozzie can you include a table like this in the OP? - |

iskflakes
910
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Marketing Chairman Stalin wrote:Marketing Chairman Stalin wrote:Kat Ayclism wrote:MissBolyai wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:For reference, this will increase the cost of running a max skilled Rhea from Jita to RIT-A7 (jump drive transit the whole way) from ~50m isk to ~75m isk. I appreciate this explanation for those who cannot grasp what a 50% increase would look like numerically. For those that cannot grasp this, here's a chart: Old jump cost (in millions)New jump cost (in millions) 11.5 23 34.5 46 57.5 69 710.5 812 913.5 1015 1116.5 1218 1319.5 1421 1522.5 1624 1725.5 1827 1928.5 2030 2131.5 2233 2334.5 2436 2537.5 2639 2740.5 2842 2943.5 3045 3146.5 3248 3349.5 3451 3552.5 3654 3755.5 3857 3958.5 4060 4161.5 4263 4364.5 4466 4567.5 4669 4770.5 4872 4973.5 5075 5176.5 5278 5379.5 5481 5582.5 5684 5785.5 5887 5988.5 6090 6191.5 6293 6394.5 6496 6597.5 6699 67100.5 68102 69103.5 70105 71106.5 72108 73109.5 74111 75112.5 76114 77115.5 78117 79118.5 80120 81121.5 82123 83124.5 84126 85127.5 86129 87130.5 88132 89133.5 90135 91136.5 92138 93139.5 94141 95142.5 96144 97145.5 98147 99148.5 100150 101151.5 102153 103154.5 104156 105157.5 106159 107160.5 108162 109163.5 110165 111166.5 112168 113169.5 114171 115172.5 116174 117175.5 118177 119178.5 120180 121181.5 122183 123184.5 124186 125187.5 126189 127190.5 128192 129193.5 130195 131196.5 132198 133199.5 134201 135202.5 136204 137205.5 138207 139208.5 140210 141211.5 142213 143214.5 144216 145217.5 146219 147220.5 148222 149223.5 150225 151226.5 152228 153229.5 154231 155232.5 156234 157235.5 158237 159238.5 160240 161241.5 162243 163244.5 164246 165247.5 166249 167250.5 168252 169253.5 170255 171256.5 172258 173259.5 174261 175262.5 176264 177265.5 178267 179268.5 180270 181271.5 182273 183274.5 184276 185277.5 186279 187280.5 188282 189283.5 190285 191286.5 192288 193289.5 194291 195292.5 196294 197295.5 198297 199298.5 200300 201301.5 202303 203304.5 204306 205307.5 206309 207310.5 208312 209313.5 210315 211316.5 212318 213319.5 214321 215322.5 216324 217325.5 218327 219328.5 220330 221331.5 222333 223334.5 224336 225337.5 226339 227340.5 228342 229343.5 230345 231346.5 232348 233349.5 234351 235352.5 236354 237355.5 238357 239358.5 240360 241361.5 242363 243364.5 244366 245367.5 246369 247370.5 248372 249373.5 250375 251376.5 252378 253379.5 254381 255382.5 256384 257385.5 258387 259388.5 260390 261391.5 262393 263394.5 264396 265397.5 266399 267400.5 268402 269403.5 I'm not sure I get it I think it's the old cost times 1.75 but I'm not sure, so I did it in excel to check, it's actually old cost x 1.5 and gives 11.5 23 34.5 46 57.5 69 710.5 812 913.5 1015 1116.5 1218 1319.5 1421 1522.5 1624 1725.5 1827 1928.5 2030 2131.5 2233 2334.5 2436 2537.5 2639 2740.5 2842 2943.5 3045 3146.5 3248 3349.5 3451 3552.5 3654 3755.5 3857 3958.5 4060 4161.5 4263 4364.5 4466 4567.5 4669 4770.5 4872 4973.5 5075 5176.5 5278 5379.5 5481 5582.5 5684 5785.5 5887 5988.5 6090 6191.5 6293 6394.5 6496 6597.5 6699 67100.5 68102 69103.5 70105 71106.5 72108 73109.5 74111 75112.5 76114 77115.5 78117 79118.5 80120 81121.5 82123 83124.5 84126 85127.5 86129 87130.5 88132 89133.5 90135 91136.5 92138 93139.5 94141 95142.5 96144 97145.5 98147 99148.5 100150 101151.5 102153 103154.5 104156 105157.5 106159 107160.5 108162 109163.5 110165 111166.5 112168 113169.5 114171 115172.5 116174 117175.5 118177 119178.5 120180 121181.5 122183 123184.5 124186 125187.5 126189 127190.5 128192 129193.5 130195 131196.5 132198 133199.5 134201 135202.5 136204 137205.5 138207 139208.5 140210 141211.5 142213 143214.5 144216 145217.5 146219 147220.5 148222 149223.5 150225 151226.5 152228 153229.5 154231 155232.5 156234 157235.5 158237 159238.5 160240 161241.5 162243 163244.5 164246 165247.5 166249 167250.5 168252 169253.5 170255 171256.5 172258 173259.5 174261 175262.5 176264 177265.5 178267 179268.5 180270 181271.5 182273 183274.5 184276 185277.5 186279 187280.5 188282 189283.5 190285 191286.5 192288 193289.5 194291 195292.5 196294 197295.5 198297 199298.5 200300 201301.5 202303 203304.5 204306 205307.5 206309 207310.5 208312 209313.5 210315 211316.5 212318 213319.5 214321 215322.5 216324 217325.5 218327 219328.5 220330 - |

iskflakes
910
|
Posted - 2014.04.29 14:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Thead Enco wrote:FFS, will you be expanding the fleet hangers on carriers?
Fozzie fixed this issue by making the isotopes smaller. - |

iskflakes
918
|
Posted - 2014.06.25 15:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We will be giving doomsday isotope consumption some thought and bringing it up with the CSM, thanks.
I noticed this was changed on SISI - doomsdays now use more isotopes.
At current prices it's going to cost me 75 million to shoot a single shot with my titan now. A much needed nerf to those titan fleets you see everywhere. - |
| |
|