Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Miles Bright
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
This topic has probably been passed around more times than the bible but here we go.
Is the Naga more superior to the Rokh despite being a grade lower?
I've flown both now and to be honest the Rokh is proving more of a burden than a successor. Here is what I've noticed while using my loadouts.
With the Naga's 95% reduction for large hybrid weapons I can easily equip x8 425mm Compressed Coil guns and have plenty of CPU and Power for a variety of upgrades to enhance my range (both weapon and lock on), tracking speed, movement speed damage and damage control.
Along with this the Naga Locks onto small targets in roughly 5 seconds allowing me to blast away while range is still my ally.
A perfect ship in my eyes is played correctly in any scenario. the lack of a drone bay is perhaps its ONLY let down.
While Playing with the Rokh I had trouble equipping all x8 425mm Compressed Coil guns along with the satisfactory add-ons to match the Naga and include the famous tanking abilities. (I ended up with x6 or x7 coil guns)
Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
I'm often finding myself sitting there tanking while my drones pick off the smaller ships because the Rokh is to slow to lock and move.
I have tried the blaster variant which has proved better than compressed coil guns, but still struggles against the faster ships. and I do fear will struggle with its slow speed at perusing larger vessels.
I feel like i'm flying an obese punching bag rather than a ship
Does anyone have any tips on how to bring out better use in my Rokh or does anyone agree with my facts? It could be that i'm a crap player or I could be right, let us know =)
P.s, Rant Over, Thanks for reading
|

Karen Avioras
Unsung Heroes Spaceship Samurai
711
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
The rokh can take a bigger punch |

Cassandra Aurilien
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
PVE or PVP?
If PVE, what exactly are you using it for?
Also, a Naga is a size category smaller, not a grade lower. Bigger isn't necessarily better, especially if you are trying to use it to run something like level 3's. The Rokh is meant to be a long range sniper (100KM+ away). There are far better ships than either for closer ranges than that.
Edit: Easy way to use the Rokh - MJD drive out. Snipe. MJD back. |

Arronicus
X-Prot Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
1003
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
They are different ships for different roles, trying to directly compare them is silly. Sure, the ships carry similar bonuses, and were directly designed to favour the same weapon system, railguns. Both also work out quite well with blasters. The similarities end there. The rokh can be a self tanking monster, the naga is only effective in pvp situations with a buffer fit. The rokh favours a big tank, the naga favours speed. The rokh has drones to deal with small targets, the naga is completely defenseless against a frig that gets under its guns.
With good skills, you can fit a full rack of 425mm railgun IIs to a rokh just the same as to a naga, both fits require a reactor control usually if you want an MWD and other junk on there.
Both are good in their own role, and both most certainly are different ships for different roles. Neither is 'superior' nor is either a grade higher or lower. One is a battlecruiser, one is a battleship. Under the old rating system, the Naga is a tier 3 battlecruiser, the rokh is a tier 3 battleship. |

Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters
257
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Naga please. "EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler |

Kijo Rikki
Powder and Ball Alchemists Union The Predictables
692
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
The Rokh is going to have a much better tank than the Naga, the Naga is designed more for long range pvp sniping hit and run tactics, it's not designed to get into a brawl nor do anything PVE related that requires tanking multiple battleship spawns. I guess you could kite with it in PVE but I would venture sig radius would make it nearly a moot point.
Battleships really aren't good for pvp unless you're in a fleet doctrine fit and in a fleet operation. The low maneuverability, tracking and locking usually makes any class BS caught alone easy pickings for smaller gangs. Basically whats already been said, they're not comparable, they both fill different roles. It is really hard to change your signature settings |

WASPY69
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
281
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
Naga
- Glass canon
- Almost 4 times as cheap as the Rokh
- Faster aligning
- Smaller sig compared to the Rokh
Rokh
- Can take a serious beating, and is less likely to be alpha'd and can take two or three volleys of damage from enemy fleet allowing reps to have a chance to land, whereas a Naga would 'splode badly.
- Can use MJD in fleets to dictate range or GTFO.
- Can fit for Disco for fun tiems either popping pods or pipebombing
As for PVE as your OP seems to suggest, they would both be able to get the job done. Rokh for newer players where tank is more important, and the Naga for more experienced players to blitz the missions with it's sig tank and dps.
Sure there's more to it, but that's all from the top of my head vOv |

NIFTYGetAtMe
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
Why expect to kite in a big slow battleship with the same efficiency as a slightly less slow battlecruiser?? And why compare a BS to a BC when engaging small targets?? BS's have terrible lock times, so engage other BS's. The Rokh has always been a Battleship fleet sniper and a viable solo ship because of it's large buffer ability or extreme active tank ability. Don't say "is the ship designed to do what I want superior to a ship that isn't designed to do what I want, but I'll do what I want with it anyway?" If you want to make the Rokh seem better, brawl with a blaster fit or try kiting other slower battleships like armor Typhoons with Null ammo. |

Bruce Bayne
The Red Circle Inc.
33
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
yes naga. always. |

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
725
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yet another?
I don't think I've ever seen this topic before, probably because most players are at least vaguely aware of the relative strengths and weaknesses of assault BCs and Battleships.
Quote:Is the Naga more superior to the Rokh despite being a grade lower?
Oh. You're one of those. Yeah, the Naga isn't a "grade lower" than a Rokh. It's just a different class of ship. You don't "level up" from a Naga to a Rokh. That's not how Eve works. "Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|

Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar E.A.R.T.H. Federation
504
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
Naga Doctrine.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22245
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote:Yet another?
I don't think I've ever seen this topic before, probably because most players are at least vaguely aware of the relative strengths and weaknesses of assault BCs and Battleships. Hey! I was going to say that. Give me back my post!  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Panhandle Industries Order of the Exalted
592
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Take a naga fleet into incursions and tell me how it goes. Hint. The rokh is actually good there. New player resources: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á |

Miles Bright
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:28:00 -
[14] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote: Oh. You're one of those. Yeah, the Naga isn't a "grade lower" than a Rokh. It's just a different class of ship. You don't "level up" from a Moa to a Naga to a Rokh. That's not how Eve works..
I guess my terminology was way off here. I do not consider the Naga to be like a stepping stone within the game to get larger ships.
I meant it as the Naga is somewhat like a Pocket Battleship of WW2 Its a class lower or a whatever floats your boat -.-
I was trying to ask that the Rokh seems to be less effective than the Naga in its Offensive capabilities. Despite the fact they should "technically" be the same.
I know the Rokh is better at "tanking" and I couldn't care less about that, I know that already. I simply wanted to compare there Offensive capabilities against each other.
As I tried to explain in the OP I struggled to fit all 8 railguns onto the Rokh, where as the smaller Naga could easily fit all 8 without a power manager. and (all defence aside) the Naga seems to fair better than the Rokh when they should be the same in theory.
Make sense?
|

Aiwha
Trans Secunda Nulli Secunda
748
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:35:00 -
[15] - Quote
Can't stop the Rokh. A spray bottle can stop the origami spaceship that is the Naga. We're winning the war if it says so on CAOD! -á
|

WASPY69
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
281
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote:You don't "level up" from a Moa to a Naga to a Rokh. That's not how Eve works. For some reason I envisioned a Moa evolving into a Naga pokemon style. I need to get some sleep. |

Grimpak
Shifting Sands Trader Cartel Bleak Horizon Alliance.
1532
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:41:00 -
[17] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote: Oh. You're one of those. Yeah, the Naga isn't a "grade lower" than a Rokh. It's just a different class of ship. You don't "level up" from a Moa to a Naga to a Rokh. That's not how Eve works..
I guess my terminology was way off here. I do not consider the Naga to be like a stepping stone within the game to get larger ships. I meant it as the Naga is somewhat like a Pocket Battleship of WW2 Its a class lower or a whatever floats your boat -.- I was trying to ask that the Rokh seems to be less effective than the Naga in its Offensive capabilities. Despite the fact they should "technically" be the same. I know the Rokh is better at "tanking" and I couldn't care less about that, I know that already. I simply wanted to compare there Offensive capabilities against each other. As I tried to explain in the OP I struggled to fit all 8 railguns onto the Rokh, where as the smaller Naga could easily fit all 8 without a power manager. and (all defence aside) the Naga seems to fair better than the Rokh when they should be the same in theory. Make sense? let's get pointillistic, and look at the issue from a fair distance:
Battlecruiser is for hit and run. Battleship is main battle pounder.
From that, expand or specify. Whatever need you have will be satisfied by your new-found knowledge.
That said, Naga is cool, and Rohk is a big ass rock or a cinderblock and you can't stop it \o\ [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22246
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:52:00 -
[18] - Quote
Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?!  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

NIFTYGetAtMe
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 22:07:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?!  Trying to make it a machariel-esque rail kiter that can hold range on cruisers and battlecruisers and lock frigates in ~5 seconds. |

Shad0wsFury
Forbin's Undergarment Trading Company Straight Improbability
111
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 22:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Offensively there is little difference between the Rokh and the Naga. You have discovered the purpose of the Tier 3 Battlecruisers: They are designed to hit just (or nearly just) as hard as a battleship, but were designed to be very weak on tank. Even compared to the other BCs, the tier 3s are weak on tank.
If you're gonna sit there and sperge that you "don't want to hear" that a BS can tank better, then what are we here to discuss? You know what the difference in purpose between a Rokh and a Naga are. So why make this thread?
|
|

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
742
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 23:09:00 -
[21] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote:
As I tried to explain in the OP I struggled to fit all 8 railguns onto the Rokh, where as the smaller Naga could easily fit all 8 without a power manager. and (all defence aside) the Naga seems to fair better than the Rokh when they should be the same in theory.
Make sense?
Nothing about comparing a single stat, in a vacuum absent all other stats, really "makes sense".
Yes, the naga has a larger percentage of its grid left over after fitting a full rack of 425s* and, yeah, all else being equal it does more gun DPS than a Rokh since it gets a +5% damage per level that the Rokh lacks. If all you care about is EFT-warrioring max DPS then, yep, the Naga is going to win that fight.
There is no, "They should be the same in theory." I'm not sure which "theory" you're citing but it isn't anything that actually applies to Eve.
Quote:Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?! Ugh
I'm guessing bad support skills and probably rushed battleships.
*Of course, that doesn't really matter that much because the amount of grid that non-gun mods consume on these respective ships is wildly different. A T2 MWD on a Naga will eat 15% of its total base grid (max skills), while a 100mn MWD on a Rokh will eat 7.3% of its grid. An LSE II on a naga? 11.3%. On a Rokh? 0.67%.
TL;DR: Meaningless comparisons are meaningless. "Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Destoya
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
280
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 00:09:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vulture is superior to them both if you can stomach the cost, the stats are pretty crazy on it. |

DrSmegma
Smegma United
245
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 01:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Heh. I still think of that topic everytime. "CCP please don't call your new ship the 'Naga'"... it was great. Space lonely? www.multicamchat.com |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
1085
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 06:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
I favor the Rokh because. Stupidity should be a bannable offense.
Also This --> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=216699
Please stop making "afk cloak" threads, thanks in advance. |

Luwc
Biohazard. WINMATAR.
135
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 06:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Try a XL ASB Blaster ROKH vs. a Blaster Nag Try tanking a Nag like a Rokh Try fitting a MJD
Try flying a Nag in 150+ BS gangs.
http://hugelolcdn.com/i/267520.gif |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15667
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 06:48:00 -
[26] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote:This topic has probably been passed around more times than the bible but here we go.
Is the Naga more superior to the Rokh despite being a grade lower?
I've flown both now and to be honest the Rokh is proving more of a burden than a successor. Here is what I've noticed while using my loadouts.
With the Naga's 95% reduction for large hybrid weapons I can easily equip x8 425mm Compressed Coil guns and have plenty of CPU and Power for a variety of upgrades to enhance my range (both weapon and lock on), tracking speed, movement speed damage and damage control.
Along with this the Naga Locks onto small targets in roughly 5 seconds allowing me to blast away while range is still my ally.
A perfect ship in my eyes is played correctly in any scenario. the lack of a drone bay is perhaps its ONLY let down.
While Playing with the Rokh I had trouble equipping all x8 425mm Compressed Coil guns along with the satisfactory add-ons to match the Naga and include the famous tanking abilities. (I ended up with x6 or x7 coil guns)
Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
I'm often finding myself sitting there tanking while my drones pick off the smaller ships because the Rokh is to slow to lock and move.
I have tried the blaster variant which has proved better than compressed coil guns, but still struggles against the faster ships. and I do fear will struggle with its slow speed at perusing larger vessels.
I feel like i'm flying an obese punching bag rather than a ship
Does anyone have any tips on how to bring out better use in my Rokh or does anyone agree with my facts? It could be that i'm a crap player or I could be right, let us know =)
P.s, Rant Over, Thanks for reading
Edit: Unlike all the other threads I don't want to see "It can tank, take more damage etc etc etc" I want to know what way is the battleship more offensive than the battlecruiser, because at the moment it seems inferior.
Again, I already know it can take more hits, I said that when I called the rokh a punching bag.
The Rokh can do things the Naga can't. Like hold a battlefield.
If you bring a naga fleet to take on a similar-sized rokh fleet, the Naga fleet can almost certainly escape, but if there's an objective (eg defend or take a POS) then the Rokhs will hand the Nags their ass on a platter. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15667
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 06:58:00 -
[27] - Quote
As for fittings, maybe update your EFT because the Rokh got a nice PG boost a while ago and it can fit a rack of T2 450mm rails with ease. Here's a pretty cookie cutter Rokh fleet fit template that doesn't even need AWU 5 except if you want to dual-prop it (MWD + MJD) in which case, yeah you'll need to drop a MFS or the Sig Amp for a Power Diagnostic.
There's enough fitting space for variations like dropping an invuln for a medium cap booster without coming close to exceeding your fittings budget.
[Rokh, Fleet] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control II Signal Amplifier II
100MN Microwarpdrive II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II EM Ward Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II
425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L 425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L 425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L 425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L 425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L 425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L 425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L 425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
Large Core Defense Field Extender I Large Core Defense Field Extender I Large Core Defense Field Extender I
Warrior II x5 Hornet EC-300 x5
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Miles Bright
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 07:33:00 -
[28] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?! 
I dunno, i even placed them on first and it only allowed x7 to be online. I've had to use a power manager, something the naga didnt need o.O
Thats whats confusing me. |

Reiisha
Splint Eye Probabilities Inc. Dawn of Transcendence
585
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 08:22:00 -
[29] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote:This topic has probably been passed around more times than the bible but here we go.
Is the Naga more superior to the Rokh despite being a grade lower?
I've flown both now and to be honest the Rokh is proving more of a burden than a successor. Here is what I've noticed while using my loadouts.
With the Naga's 95% reduction for large hybrid weapons I can easily equip x8 425mm Compressed Coil guns and have plenty of CPU and Power for a variety of upgrades to enhance my range (both weapon and lock on), tracking speed, movement speed damage and damage control.
Along with this the Naga Locks onto small targets in roughly 5 seconds allowing me to blast away while range is still my ally.
A perfect ship in my eyes is played correctly in any scenario. the lack of a drone bay is perhaps its ONLY let down.
While Playing with the Rokh I had trouble equipping all x8 425mm Compressed Coil guns along with the satisfactory add-ons to match the Naga and include the famous tanking abilities. (I ended up with x6 or x7 coil guns)
Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
I'm often finding myself sitting there tanking while my drones pick off the smaller ships because the Rokh is to slow to lock and move.
I have tried the blaster variant which has proved better than compressed coil guns, but still struggles against the faster ships. and I do fear will struggle with its slow speed at perusing larger vessels.
I feel like i'm flying an obese punching bag rather than a ship
Does anyone have any tips on how to bring out better use in my Rokh or does anyone agree with my facts? It could be that i'm a crap player or I could be right, let us know =)
P.s, Rant Over, Thanks for reading
Edit: Unlike all the other threads I don't want to see "It can tank, take more damage etc etc etc" I want to know what way is the battleship more offensive than the battlecruiser, because at the moment it seems inferior.
Again, I already know it can take more hits, I said that when I called the rokh a punching bag.
1) You need to train up skills like engineering, electronics and advanced weapon upgrades to fully appreciate any ship. Seeing as you're one month old you don't really have the skills to fly a battleship or even a battlecruiser effectively yet - Just because you can fly it doesn't mean you can fly it well. This cannot be stressed enough.
A lot of newer players make the mistake of rushing to battleships without really having any support skills, or ignoring them alltogether. That, and battleships/battlecruisers are just a cog in the grand scheme, not an end goal. I'd strongly advise that you stick to frigates or cruisers for a bit untill you get those support skills at level 3 or 4 at least. Also, don't stick to missions - Find a corp and get your feet wet in PvP while it's still cheap to lose ships and clones! :)
2) The advantage of the Rokh lies in it's HP. Otherwise, both ships are sniper ships - They either kill in one or two volleys from 150+km or they warp off to find another engagement. Both ships also find their biggest strength in tech 2 railguns, because of Spike ammo. The Rokh also has more support options with simply having more slots available.
3) This discussion belong in Ships & Modules.
If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all... |

Grimpak
Shifting Sands Trader Cartel Bleak Horizon Alliance.
1533
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 08:45:00 -
[30] - Quote
/thread. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22248
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 08:57:00 -
[31] - Quote
Let's not forget ROKH MAN!. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15671
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 09:02:00 -
[32] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote:Tippia wrote:Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?!  I dunno, i even placed them on first and it only allowed x7 to be online. I've had to use a power manager, something the naga didnt need o.O Thats whats confusing me.
I recommend that you train the Advanced Weapon Upgrades skill as soon as possible. It reduces the power grid requirements of all weapons by 2% per level. That doesn't sound like much but it will open a world of fitting options to you. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Ka'Narlist
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
160
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 09:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote: While Playing with the Rokh I had trouble equipping all x8 425mm Compressed Coil guns along with the satisfactory add-ons to match the Naga and include the famous tanking abilities. (I ended up with x6 or x7 coil guns)
Thats no problem of the Rokh but of your awfull skills. |

Grimpak
Shifting Sands Trader Cartel Bleak Horizon Alliance.
1534
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 09:44:00 -
[34] - Quote
ROHK MAN! [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
748
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 14:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote:Tippia wrote:Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?!  I dunno, i even placed them on first and it only allowed x7 to be online. I've had to use a power manager, something the naga didnt need o.O Thats whats confusing me.
As others have noted, that's because you don't actually have the support skills to fly a battleship yet. Once upon a time new players were commonly advised to avoid rushing for battleships for precisely that reason. I see this advice given far less frequently now, but it's still pretty true. Power Grid Management 5 and Advanced Weapon Upgrades 5 free up plenty of overhead after guns.
As an aside, if you can't fit a full rack of guns, and you don't want to wait until you actually have the supports to fly a battleship, consider stepping down one size and fitting a full rack that way. 8x 350mm rails will do more DPS than 7x 425s. You will give up some range, but you'll pick up a bit of tracking, so your applied DPS may be slightly better or slightly worse, depending on the situation and what you're shooting at.
Also, it sounds like you're probably trying to fit your ships in game. Don't do that. Download some offline fitting tool like EFT or Pyfa so you can assemble a hypothetical fitting out of game first. These will also let you adjust the relevant skills so you can see the impact skills like AWU will have on your ability to fit a ship. "Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Sven Inneson
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 15:18:00 -
[36] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote: Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
Isn't it sort of ridiculous that a battleship suffers a penalty to locking smaller ships even though it is a bigger more advanced class of ship? I agree that large guns should suffer tracking penalties to smaller signatures, but increasing lock time as well is absurd intentional gimping just to allow for David vs. Goliath scenarios where David has the advantage. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
1593
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 15:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Miles Bright wrote:Tippia wrote:Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?!  I dunno, i even placed them on first and it only allowed x7 to be online. I've had to use a power manager, something the naga didnt need o.O Thats whats confusing me. I recommend that you train the Advanced Weapon Upgrades skill as soon as possible. It reduces the power grid requirements of all weapons by 2% per level. That doesn't sound like much but it will open a world of fitting options to you. This, this a thousand times. Get that skill done asap. "CAKE CANNOT HOLD UP TO BEING A CHARACTER DAMNIT."
Unsuccessful At Everything |

Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters
261
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 15:42:00 -
[38] - Quote
Sven Inneson wrote:Miles Bright wrote: Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
Isn't it sort of ridiculous that a battleship suffers a penalty to locking smaller ships even though it is a bigger more advanced class of ship? I agree that large guns should suffer tracking penalties to smaller signatures, but increasing lock time as well is absurd intentional gimping just to allow for David vs. Goliath scenarios where David has the advantage.
Where the hell did you get "more advanced"? There's nothing that makes a battleship inherently more advanced than any other T1 hull class. Hell my Astero can warp cloaked, can your battleship do that? Who's more advanced now? "EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler |

Mattpat139 Sukarala
Brave Privateers
1
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 15:50:00 -
[39] - Quote
To me it's quite simple The Rohk is a brawler... load up some asb goodness a couple of invuls... damage/tracking mods in the lows. the Naga is a kiter relies on speed and is sqrewed the moment it's hit by anything bigger than a frigate. they are simply two ships in different classes and are clearly intended for different roles in combat. |

Sven Inneson
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 16:00:00 -
[40] - Quote
Galen Darksmith wrote:Sven Inneson wrote:Miles Bright wrote: Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
Isn't it sort of ridiculous that a battleship suffers a penalty to locking smaller ships even though it is a bigger more advanced class of ship? I agree that large guns should suffer tracking penalties to smaller signatures, but increasing lock time as well is absurd intentional gimping just to allow for David vs. Goliath scenarios where David has the advantage. Where the hell did you get "more advanced"? There's nothing that makes a battleship inherently more advanced than any other T1 hull class. Hell my Astero can warp cloaked, can your battleship do that? Who's more advanced now?
More advanced in that it takes more skill points to pilot one and the pilot must first learn how to pilot frigates/destroyers/cruisers/battle-cruisers.. It makes no sense that a Frigate can have a built in ability to target anything extremely quick, but something that has "battle" in its ship class name can't lock onto a frigate quickly without making sacrifices... The tiny godmode tracking computer built into a frigate can't be put somewhere in a battleship? It makes no sense IRL, but of course there's the catch, there's more of an emphasis on perceived balance than making things vaguely realistic. |
|

Riyria Twinpeaks
Reasonable People Of Sound Mind
1969
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 16:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Sven Inneson wrote:Galen Darksmith wrote:Sven Inneson wrote:Miles Bright wrote: Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
Isn't it sort of ridiculous that a battleship suffers a penalty to locking smaller ships even though it is a bigger more advanced class of ship? I agree that large guns should suffer tracking penalties to smaller signatures, but increasing lock time as well is absurd intentional gimping just to allow for David vs. Goliath scenarios where David has the advantage. Where the hell did you get "more advanced"? There's nothing that makes a battleship inherently more advanced than any other T1 hull class. Hell my Astero can warp cloaked, can your battleship do that? Who's more advanced now? More advanced in that it takes more skill points to pilot one and the pilot must first learn how to pilot frigates/destroyers/cruisers/battle-cruisers.. It makes no sense that a Frigate can have a built in ability to target anything extremely quick, but something that has "battle" in its ship class name can't lock onto a frigate quickly without making sacrifices... The tiny godmode tracking computer built into a frigate can't be put somewhere in a battleship? It makes no sense IRL, but of course there's the catch, there's more of an emphasis on perceived balance than making things vaguely realistic.
Battleships produce and emit much more power. This, on the one hand, causes them to be easily locked, as there are a lot of strong emissions for a targeting computer to lock to. On the other hand, their own power signature makes it harder to lock onto weaker signatures, as the relevant emissions need to be filtered from the "noise" the battleship itself produces.
Smaller ship classes have a lower power-output which means both of these effects have less impact on them. |

Sven Inneson
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 17:22:00 -
[42] - Quote
Riyria Twinpeaks wrote:Sven Inneson wrote:Galen Darksmith wrote:Sven Inneson wrote:Miles Bright wrote: Along to its Negative points it takes a whooping 20-25 seconds to lock onto smaller ships and proves to slow for my conventional Naga tactics for staying at range effectively.
Isn't it sort of ridiculous that a battleship suffers a penalty to locking smaller ships even though it is a bigger more advanced class of ship? I agree that large guns should suffer tracking penalties to smaller signatures, but increasing lock time as well is absurd intentional gimping just to allow for David vs. Goliath scenarios where David has the advantage. Where the hell did you get "more advanced"? There's nothing that makes a battleship inherently more advanced than any other T1 hull class. Hell my Astero can warp cloaked, can your battleship do that? Who's more advanced now? More advanced in that it takes more skill points to pilot one and the pilot must first learn how to pilot frigates/destroyers/cruisers/battle-cruisers.. It makes no sense that a Frigate can have a built in ability to target anything extremely quick, but something that has "battle" in its ship class name can't lock onto a frigate quickly without making sacrifices... The tiny godmode tracking computer built into a frigate can't be put somewhere in a battleship? It makes no sense IRL, but of course there's the catch, there's more of an emphasis on perceived balance than making things vaguely realistic. Battleships produce and emit much more power. This, on the one hand, causes them to be easily locked, as there are a lot of strong emissions for a targeting computer to lock to. On the other hand, their own power signature makes it harder to lock onto weaker signatures, as the relevant emissions need to be filtered from the "noise" the battleship itself produces. Smaller ship classes have a lower power-output which means both of these effects have less impact on them.
That makes sense, I appreciate the explanation!
|

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
13804
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 20:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Naga aint got no mother ******* song about it!
Its all about the Rohk! Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Grimpak
Shifting Sands Trader Cartel Bleak Horizon Alliance.
1535
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 21:47:00 -
[44] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: dis **** be true. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
3073

|
Posted - 2014.05.28 22:04:00 -
[45] - Quote
Moving this from General Discussion to ships and Modules. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Maeltstome
Twisted Insanity. The Kadeshi
450
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 11:59:00 -
[46] - Quote
The rokh can rival Gallente Ships as a Blaster Boat thanks to the mid-slot tank and lo-slot damage mods. By default Void gives you 10km Opti on Neutrons... That's sick. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
876
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 12:29:00 -
[47] - Quote
Miles Bright wrote:Tippia wrote:Also, what the hell are you doing to the poor Rokh if you can't get a full rack of 425s on it?!  I dunno, i even placed them on first and it only allowed x7 to be online. I've had to use a power manager, something the naga didnt need o.O Thats whats confusing me.
You're missing some skills?... I hope the one day old character you're posting on is a forum alt LOL
If you're using hybrid weapon rigs they will increase your power use but even then should be less than 3% over with all modules fitted. |

James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
28
|
Posted - 2014.06.02 16:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Take a naga fleet into incursions and tell me how it goes. Hint. The rokh is actually good there. Would rather have nagas with good logi. Makes the minimum tank under boosts if you factor sig tank in, with better DPS and reasonable EWar still. That crazy bag FC with the silly things on the hull that shouldn't but just did. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |