| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sub Prime
Perkone Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
So what exactly is CCP doing about NPC drones in the Drone regions? |

Sarmatiko
185
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fixing yet another exploit. Extracting new carebear tears. Just as always. |

Boadicea Wales
THE MAGPIE ACQUISITIONS
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
I have allways thought of drone 0.0 space and any drome related missions to be a compleat waste of time and server space. |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! |

Severian Carnifex
65
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!!
Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with? |

Serial Chi
Dust Bunnies 514
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!!
I support this. There's no real reason not to. Just put the basic bounties on them like all other parts of space. With the isk faucet opened so wide with incursions, at this point, who cares if mores coming in. |

Generals4
Caldari State
332
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with?
edit: misunderstood. Well i guess it will be good old bounties . -Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. |

Dr Karsun
Coffee Lovers Brewing Club Care Factor
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
"get rid of mineral drops from drones" say the hardcore pvpers...
I wanna see the hardcore pvpers paying +50% on each single ship they buy because A - miners are ganked B - no drone minerals C - mining is boring (what most people think any way).
It's all working fine. The drone regions are still the worst place to pve in eve, don't make it a desert where even russian bots won't want to live... "Have you had your morning coffee?" -> the Coffee Lovers Brewing Club is recruiting! |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Generals4 wrote:Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with? edit: misunderstood. Well i guess it will be good old bounties . That would be the most obvious one, sure. Though looking at the big picture the last thing that EVE needs is another giant ISK faucet. And, off course, the drone regions would lose their uniqueness. |

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
437
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Razin wrote: That would be the most obvious one, sure. Though looking at the big picture the last thing that EVE needs is another giant ISK faucet. And, off course, the drone regions would lose their uniqueness.
Somehow I don't think one more region of the same bounties all the other regions have is gonna destabilize things.
At least not near as much as Drone Poop has destabilized Mining.
As for Unique... |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Razin wrote: That would be the most obvious one, sure. Though looking at the big picture the last thing that EVE needs is another giant ISK faucet. And, off course, the drone regions would lose their uniqueness.
Somehow I don't think one more region of the same bounties all the other regions have is gonna destabilize things. At least not near as much as Drone Poop has destabilized Mining. As for Unique... Nothing wrong with a simplistic opinion. Adds variety.
|

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
437
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
Razin wrote:Nothing wrong with a simplistic opinion. Adds variety.
Better a simple solution that gets things done then a unique one that has negative effects.
There is a reason were flying around in 747's instead of really cool Zeppelins. There is no Reason a Raven should be able to out mine a Hulk.
|

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:59:00 -
[14] - Quote
fuckingforumsgoddamnit |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 15:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Razin wrote:Nothing wrong with a simplistic opinion. Adds variety.
Better a simple solution that gets things done then a unique one that has negative effects. There is a reason were flying around in 747's instead of really cool Zeppelins. There is no Reason a Raven should be able to out mine a Hulk. I agree that simple solutions can be useful, like in your fork set example in the previous post.
Just an fyi, that 747 is infinitely more complex than a Zeppelin. |

FlameGlow
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 16:04:00 -
[16] - Quote
So what exactly is CCP doing about PC drones in the Drone regions? 
|

Severian Carnifex
66
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 16:06:00 -
[17] - Quote
Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with?
CCP can be lazy and replace it with ISK... one more region with same ISK faucet as all others would not make ISK value less at all... and when we have incursions on incursions on incursions... that change will have infuence of 0%... and it would SAVE minerals market...
Or CCP can be smart and make some other value thing in EVE that can be exchanged (like LP or LP or tags) or sold on market (like parts or blueprints for production)... But no point to do second thing and waste DEV time when other things make 99,9% of the problem...
This way you solve at least one problem, devaluation of minerals and goods...
And for all that ppl that will call me "carebear" for this said... (i dont know why some ppl are calling others like that when they rase this subject... but...) Who is biggest carebear? I can not think of bigger carebear that that one that mine in BS... |

Severian Carnifex
66
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 16:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
Razin wrote:Generals4 wrote:Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with? edit: misunderstood. Well i guess it will be good old bounties . That would be the most obvious one, sure. Though looking at the big picture the last thing that EVE needs is another giant ISK faucet. And, off course, the drone regions would lose their uniqueness.
about "Unique"... You can have unique things in your house when you have all the rest what you need and dont need for living... and eve only what have in infinite amounts are problems... so solve them and then add unique things (and don't beak it all again). |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 16:23:00 -
[19] - Quote
Severian Carnifex wrote: about "Unique"... You can have unique things in your house when you have all the rest what you need and dont need for living... and eve only what have in infinite amounts are problems... so solve them and then add unique things (and don't beak it all again).
You can eliminate uniqueness in the name of progress, but in the end you risk being left with a generic landscape without any character, unable to foster attachment or any sense of scale and wonder required for immersion. |

Sakurako Kimino
Volatile Nature White Noise.
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 16:33:00 -
[20] - Quote
drone regions need to be changed, how, i am not 100% sure but i do think give the npc bountys and bring the alloys inine with module drops from the other nul sec regions.
if a sanctum gave 2m trit a horde woould give 2m trit in alloys
the drone region would still be unique as no other region has the alloys but would cut the mins going to market as the sites drop less and their is a chance that players wouldn't even clear the sites.
eve is about sin |

Severian Carnifex
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 17:22:00 -
[21] - Quote
Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote: about "Unique"... You can have unique things in your house when you have all the rest what you need and dont need for living... and eve only what have in infinite amounts are problems... so solve them and then add unique things (and don't beak it all again).
You can eliminate uniqueness in the name of progress, but in the end you risk being left with a generic landscape without any character, unable to foster attachment or any sense of scale and wonder required for immersion.
And you think that's the most important uniqueness in eve... and that ppl will rage-quit if CCP change it and only what will left in eve is generic landscape???  |

bornaa
GRiD.
55
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 19:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
Severian Carnifex wrote:Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with? CCP can be lazy and replace it with ISK... one more region with same ISK faucet as all others would not make ISK value less at all... and when we have incursions on incursions on incursions... that change will have infuence of 0%... and it would SAVE minerals market... Or CCP can be smart and make some other value thing in EVE that can be exchanged (like LP or LP or tags) or sold on market (like parts or blueprints for production)... But no point to do second thing and waste DEV time when other things make 99,9% of the problem... This way you solve at least one problem, devaluation of minerals and goods... And for all that ppl that will call me "carebear" for this said... (i dont know why some ppl are calling others like that when they rase this subject... but...) Who is biggest carebear? I can not think of bigger carebear that that one that mine in BS...
I support this service!!!
Please CCP give that other part of EVE at least a chance!!!
Look at this thread for ppls ideas: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=32607
Ill quote OP:
Aquila Draco wrote:I have read somewhere DEVs reply about removing mineral drops from drones and putting something else on its place CCP, can you please give us update on this, please? Is this coming?
That's very nice change and players would be thankful. Please remove minerals from drones.
*Edit: @ CCP In this thread are some nice suggestion how to revive industry... please... give us response... Are you going to do anything on subject of rebalancing mineral faucets/drains ratio???
In state in what EVE is now there are huge problems on this subject. The most of all minerals in EVE are coming from drones. And when you add up on that loot drops you are at the point where mining dont play significant role at all. That is WRONG. Mining needs to be THE largest SOURCE (If not only) source of minerals in EVE.
Think a little about it... - Is it normal to go to mine with shotgun to mine??? - Is it normal that shooting down planes give you more materials for making new planes then mining? (WOW we have here Perpetual motion here) - Is it normal that profession for which you must have PhD is giving you revenue of burger flipper proffesion? - Is it normal that profession for which you must have PhD give you place in society for whitch ppl are saying "they need to learn their place, its at the bottom.... where they belong."
Well... all that "normal stuff" we have in EVE.
Lets translate that on EVE:
- You load your weapons on your combat ship and kill drones and rats to aquire minerals. - You aquire more minerals (much more) with shooting drones and rats then with mining. - Mining skill tree is larger then for some other, much more lucrative professions (now), and you the least revenue. - Mining skill tree is larger then for some other, much more lucrative professions (now), and ppl are saying to your face "miners need to learn their place, its at the bottom.... where they belong."
You see something wrong here??? Ppl in this thread have solutions for this problem!!!
And about Manufacturing...
Manufacturing of basic T1 items is... well... dead... And that is the first step for young players that decide to go indy way in EVE, and it is dead. I think thats just wrong.
I will not here be writing real world comparisons (but I could do it) about it but i'll say it directly. That industry is based on T1 meta 0 items... isn't it easy ko just remove that items from loot drops??? Easy and efficiently problem solved.
Revive industry in EVE, please.
Thnx you in advance.
*used intelectual property of many ppl in this thread.
|

JitaJane
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 19:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
I've pointed this out elsewhere and am half sure that this will be ignored but here goes: The value of isk is not entirely determined by the supply of isk. It is the ratio between isk and capital goods. Minerals are one of the biggest capital goods. Therefore if you reduce the influx of minerals and change nothing else (or through bounties actually increase the influx of isk) you have the same (or greater) volumes of isk competing for less minerals and prices will rise. Manufacturing chains and trading are just mediums to facilitate the isk/ goods ratio. |

Gealla
Capital Storm. Shadow of xXDEATHXx
29
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:02:00 -
[24] - Quote
Drone regions is not an "ISK Faucet" as some of you seem to think, no ISK is created in the drone regions, period.
The drone poo that drops is sold to other players for their ISk, so the region changes the ISK Flow, but does not create ISK. If you change the poo to bounties, the region will then be an ISK faucet just like any other 0.0 region. If you make items from the poo and sell it, it's still ISK from anotehr player, not created wealth.
I do as much ratting up there as I did in providence and wicked creek and make about the same sort of money doing it. I'd prefer bounties as then I wouldn't have to ship all the crap out...... |

BigCountry
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
Such misunderstandings of the drone regions.....
BTW is they took out alloys the mineral vacuum that would create would be rediculous... you really have to stop and think about it ...
|

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
439
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:13:00 -
[26] - Quote
BigCountry wrote: BTW is they took out alloys the mineral vacuum that would create would be rediculous...
Not really. The Vacuum would be filled by Mining which would draw a much larger crowd as supplies of Minerals dwindle and costs increase.
|

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp V.A.S.T.
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:22:00 -
[27] - Quote
Dr Karsun wrote:"get rid of mineral drops from drones" say the hardcore pvpers...
I wanna see the hardcore pvpers paying +50% on each single ship they buy because A - miners are ganked B - no drone minerals C - mining is boring (what most people think any way).
It's all working fine. The drone regions are still the worst place to pve in eve, don't make it a desert where even russian bots won't want to live...
I prefer tedious sirrah. The PVP folks should try mining in a WH sometime. I'll give you tedious and raise you the heavy weight of impending doom and fiery death at the hands of the cold blooded and deadly silent T3/HAC/Cane/Drake crowd that show up at the apparent near radomness no NPC could ever truly replicate.
Nothing is as terrifying as the mind of another human intending to do you harm. How truly resourceful is man when he intends to committ evil deeds.  'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp V.A.S.T.
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:34:00 -
[28] - Quote
JitaJane wrote:I've pointed this out elsewhere and am half sure that this will be ignored but here goes: The value of isk is not entirely determined by the supply of isk. It is the ratio between isk and capital goods. Minerals are one of the biggest capital goods. Therefore if you reduce the influx of minerals and change nothing else (or through bounties actually increase the influx of isk) you have the same (or greater) volumes of isk competing for less minerals and prices will rise. Manufacturing chains and trading are just mediums to facilitate the isk/ goods ratio.
I disagree, ISK as a currency has a value determined by its availability and that number keeps growing becuase more ISK is 'printed' PI, Ratting, Mining, PLEX, than the ships and modules and structures are destroyed in game resulting directly in inflation.
Add in the fact that ships, modules, and structures suffer no depreciation it contributes to the problem as well.
I think the self balancing nature of ISK loss to ISK creation is out of whack and as much as I hate to say it this might be a Carebear problem. Conflict avoidance is bad for business. EVE needs more death and destruction becuase its good for business. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
439
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:37:00 -
[29] - Quote
IGNATIUS HOOD wrote:becuase more ISK is 'printed' PI, Ratting, Mining, PLEX, than the ships and modules and structures are destroyed in game resulting directly in inflation. The Highlighted add absolutely 0 ISK into the game. |

Catlos JeminJees
E.M.P. Industries Shadow of xXDEATHXx
24
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:06:00 -
[30] - Quote
Gealla wrote: I do as much ratting up there as I did in providence and wicked creek and make about the same sort of money doing it. I'd prefer bounties as then I wouldn't have to ship all the crap out......
Quoted for truth
I make about the same(if not less) amount of Isk here than i did in catch. the only diff is that i have to move all my mineral out and that costs me more isk that goes to other players |

Joshua Aivoras
Tech IV Industries Pandorum Invictus
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:11:00 -
[31] - Quote
Either this and/or remove meta 0 drops from rats |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:BigCountry wrote: BTW is they took out alloys the mineral vacuum that would create would be rediculous...
Not really. The Vacuum would be filled by Mining which would draw a much larger crowd as supplies of Minerals dwindle and costs increase. Which in turn will make for more ganking opportunities, the killing of more Hulks, making more forum rage, driving up mineral and T2 goo prices even further................ making the CFC and Russians richer......
The more things change.................................. |

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
439
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
K Suri wrote: Which in turn will make for more ganking opportunities, the killing of more Hulks, making more forum rage, driving up mineral and T2 goo prices even further................ making the CFC and Russians richer......
The more things change..................................
Not really. There would be no new opportunities. I bet if I logged on now, what ever system I am in there will be a Barge that I could gank.
The field of targets is soooo populated that added 2000 more would not effect anything accept lessening an individuals chance of getting Ganked. Not only would it be rarer but the extra profits will make any lose sting less.
The biggest chanch with an increase in Mineral worth would be an increase in Null Sec Mining. |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
720
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:28:00 -
[34] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:BigCountry wrote: BTW is they took out alloys the mineral vacuum that would create would be rediculous...
Not really. The Vacuum would be filled by Mining which would draw a much larger crowd as supplies of Minerals dwindle and costs increase. Which in turn will make for more ganking opportunities, the killing of more Hulks, making more forum rage, driving up mineral and T2 goo prices even further................ making the CFC and Russians richer...... The more things change..................................
I dont agree with you... prices would not be that high at all...
but...
So... what are you saying... keep little man broke so that some big mans don't have more??? |

Zimmy Zeta
Battle Force Industries
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:37:00 -
[35] - Quote
Sakurako Kimino wrote:drone regions need to be changed, how, i am not 100% sure but i do think give the npc bountys and bring the alloys inine with module drops from the other nul sec regions.
....
I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part? |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:38:00 -
[36] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:K Suri wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:BigCountry wrote: BTW is they took out alloys the mineral vacuum that would create would be rediculous...
Not really. The Vacuum would be filled by Mining which would draw a much larger crowd as supplies of Minerals dwindle and costs increase. Which in turn will make for more ganking opportunities, the killing of more Hulks, making more forum rage, driving up mineral and T2 goo prices even further................ making the CFC and Russians richer...... The more things change.................................. I dont agree with you... prices would not be that high at all... but... So... what are you saying... keep little man broke so that some big mans don't have more??? I'm surmising that if there is truth in 74% of minerals is supplied by drones and the slack gets picked up by miners, then the majority of supply is bought into contestable space.
I say "contestable" in that the drone goo comes from solidly occupied space now that would require a major invasion to choke supply.
With a shift to predominately highsec mining (that's an assumption) - a concerted event like Hulkageddon with Goons input could put a serious dent in the supply - at least in low-ends.
Just a thought.
|

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
439
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:47:00 -
[37] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote: I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part?
This is an important part of fixing Mining. Minerals are not ISK but can be exchanged for ISK. When the amount of Minerals being brought in outstrips the amount being destroyed the price goes down and stockpiles rise.
Eliminating a major source of Minerals outside of Mining will thereby increase the value of the Minerals being Mined.
Mining Fixed. |

Kietay Ayari
Monopoly Money Operations
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:48:00 -
[38] - Quote
Can someone explain to me what is wrong with drones? o_o Ferox #1 |

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
439
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:56:00 -
[39] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:Can someone explain to me what is wrong with drones? o_o Drones produce Minerals. Minerals are sold to other players and used to build things meaning there is a point where there value goes down because to many have been brought in.
You can get more Minerals popping Drones then max skill Mining. It is one of the main reasons Mining as a profession is not profitable.
|

Zimmy Zeta
Battle Force Industries
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:57:00 -
[40] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote: I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part?
This is an important part of fixing Mining. Minerals are not ISK but can be exchanged for ISK. When the amount of Minerals being brought in outstrips the amount being destroyed the price goes down and stockpiles rise. Eliminating a major source of Minerals outside of Mining will thereby increase the value of the Minerals being Mined. Mining Fixed.
I for one will never, ever set a foot into a mining barge again. I think most of us started of with mining, in a newbie mining corp. And most of us eventually found out, that paying monthly for a game where you spend most of your time semi-afk watching tv while doing the same boring repetitive bull*** over and over again is simply terrible. Most people moved on from mining to other activities and discovered how much fun eve can be. And you really want to force them all back into their barges by eliminating the alternatives to mining?
|

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
720
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:59:00 -
[41] - Quote
K Suri wrote:Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:K Suri wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:BigCountry wrote: BTW is they took out alloys the mineral vacuum that would create would be rediculous...
Not really. The Vacuum would be filled by Mining which would draw a much larger crowd as supplies of Minerals dwindle and costs increase. Which in turn will make for more ganking opportunities, the killing of more Hulks, making more forum rage, driving up mineral and T2 goo prices even further................ making the CFC and Russians richer...... The more things change.................................. I dont agree with you... prices would not be that high at all... but... So... what are you saying... keep little man broke so that some big mans don't have more??? I'm surmising that if there is truth in 74% of minerals is supplied by drones and the slack gets picked up by miners, then the majority of supply is bought into contestable space. I say "contestable" in that the drone goo comes from solidly occupied space now that would require a major invasion to choke supply. With a shift to predominately highsec mining (that's an assumption) - a concerted event like Hulkageddon with Goons input could put a serious dent in the supply - at least in low-ends. Just a thought.
And... what were prices of minerals before drone regions are introduced??? You see... we would get back at that state... and then was not this problems you are talking about...
yea... it would be one big BUM in prices for some time until all comes down to its place... but if all would come back around that numbers that was then...
and now i am feeling like ppl that was trying to prevent this economical crisis in world and no one wanted to listen... this state in which EVE is is like world economical crisis... and its killing eve... |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
48
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:52:00 -
[42] - Quote
whats the difference about monetary inflation and devaluation of some goods??? I don't see a difference... minerals ARE isk for indy ppl!!!
|

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
112
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 00:09:00 -
[43] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote: I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part?
This is an important part of fixing Mining. Minerals are not ISK but can be exchanged for ISK. When the amount of Minerals being brought in outstrips the amount being destroyed the price goes down and stockpiles rise. Eliminating a major source of Minerals outside of Mining will thereby increase the value of the Minerals being Mined. Mining Fixed. I for one will never, ever set a foot into a mining barge again. I think most of us started of with mining, in a newbie mining corp. And most of us eventually found out, that paying monthly for a game where you spend most of your time semi-afk watching tv while doing the same boring repetitive bull*** over and over again is simply terrible. Most people moved on from mining to other activities and discovered how much fun eve can be. And you really want to force them all back into their barges by eliminating the alternatives to mining?
You maybe wont set a foot into a mining barge... But there is a lot of ppl that want it... that like not intense gaming while chatting with corp mates... and that will do it if it would be profitable... And you cant blame them now for not mining... Today, mining in EVE is beneath a dignity of every human being...
Elanor Vega wrote:whats the difference about monetary inflation and devaluation of some goods??? I don't see a difference... minerals ARE isk for indy ppl!!!
+1000 |

Vettanine
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 00:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
Catlos JeminJees wrote:Gealla wrote: I do as much ratting up there as I did in providence and wicked creek and make about the same sort of money doing it. I'd prefer bounties as then I wouldn't have to ship all the crap out......
Quoted for truth I make about the same(if not less) amount of Isk here than i did in catch. the only diff is that i have to move all my mineral out and that costs me more isk that goes to other players
Implying you ship anything out is funny, because we know that you don't. You sell to the local barons and they utilize the minerals to build caps/supers and JF the excess into empire at their leisure. You aren't paid jita asking for your minerals, but you don't have to worry about moving them either.
I've lived all over the east on my alts to make isk and it's by-far one of the safest means to make isk in nullsec, even though it is certainly not an actual isk faucet. That doesn't mean there are some inherent drawbacks for managing the operation of drone region nullsec vs. somewhere else, but those hurdles have been jumped years and years ago and the rewards are obvious now. |

Rykuss
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 01:08:00 -
[45] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote: I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part?
This is an important part of fixing Mining. Minerals are not ISK but can be exchanged for ISK. When the amount of Minerals being brought in outstrips the amount being destroyed the price goes down and stockpiles rise. Eliminating a major source of Minerals outside of Mining will thereby increase the value of the Minerals being Mined. Mining Fixed. I for one will never, ever set a foot into a mining barge again. I think most of us started of with mining, in a newbie mining corp. And most of us eventually found out, that paying monthly for a game where you spend most of your time semi-afk watching tv while doing the same boring repetitive bull*** over and over again is simply terrible. Most people moved on from mining to other activities and discovered how much fun eve can be. And you really want to force them all back into their barges by eliminating the alternatives to mining?
Nope, noone expects you to mine a single rock. Keep flying around blowing things up and having fun, as normal. There is an alternative to mining already in place, buy the minerals. Can I have your vindicator? |

Kietay Ayari
Monopoly Money Operations
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 01:14:00 -
[46] - Quote
Avila Cracko wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:whats the difference about monetary inflation and devaluation of some goods??? I don't see a difference... minerals ARE isk for indy ppl!!!
+1000
This is completely true. If you replaced the minerals from drones with money, you just make minerals more expensive... which if you stop there (like some people have) seems to be good for miners. But if minerals are more expensive so are ships and therefore the extra money you make really isn't extra because the value of the money you make is still the same.
D: There really is no way to make mining more profitable.
Ferox #1 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
848
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 01:20:00 -
[47] - Quote
I don't live in the drone regions, but I don't have a problem with gun mining. It's a major source of high-end minerals and I really don't want to mine bistot/crokite all day. |

myFORUMalt alts
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 01:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
I live in drones, and i vote for bounties. However, saying that, i understand the problem with adding another isk faucet, which begs to ask, how is isk destroyed in the game.
I know, the lp store insurance clone grades
I think the solution to the problem is too fold. CCP would have to develop more ways to destroy isk, while putting bounties on rogue drones.
Now for the most obsurd idea of the day. You dont have to remove the minerals from the rogue drone wrecks. Granted you could reduce the ammount in rogue drone battleships, but you dont have to kill it. You kill an npc battle ship it may have well over a mil in loot dropped, no reason why there cant be .5 - 1.5 mil in drone poop in the drone to match their npc counter parts. This solution along with developing more isk destruction methods would cope for the new isk faucet and buffer the destablization of mineral prices.
perhaps an isk for lp exchange would help destroy isk while adding personal wealth to players.
Yes, I complain about things I don't like. |

Kietay Ayari
Monopoly Money Operations
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 02:06:00 -
[49] - Quote
Insurance actually creates ISK btw :o Ferox #1 |

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 07:42:00 -
[50] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:Avila Cracko wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:whats the difference about monetary inflation and devaluation of some goods??? I don't see a difference... minerals ARE isk for indy ppl!!!
+1000 This is completely true. If you replaced the minerals from drones with money, you just make minerals more expensive... which if you stop there (like some people have) seems to be good for miners. But if minerals are more expensive so are ships and therefore the extra money you make really isn't extra because the value of the money you make is still the same. D: There really is no way to make mining more profitable.
Yea... there is... Because indy ppl don't need isk for all things in game... They can produce things for themselfs...
End right now... big problem for miners/indy is to buy even skill-books (things from NPCs) and thats just so lame...  |

Jooce McNasty
Islefive Consulting
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 07:48:00 -
[51] - Quote
Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with?
Remove minerals from drone regions.
Add in a new line of items like
Rogue Drone - Weapon system Rogue Drone - Propultion System Rogue Drone - Navigation System Ect Ect Ect
Then make is so you can reverse engineer a T2 drone and these rogue drone items and make a Faction style rogue drone. |

Zimmy Zeta
Battle Force Industries
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 07:58:00 -
[52] - Quote
Rykuss wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote: I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part?
This is an important part of fixing Mining. Minerals are not ISK but can be exchanged for ISK. When the amount of Minerals being brought in outstrips the amount being destroyed the price goes down and stockpiles rise. Eliminating a major source of Minerals outside of Mining will thereby increase the value of the Minerals being Mined. Mining Fixed. I for one will never, ever set a foot into a mining barge again. I think most of us started of with mining, in a newbie mining corp. And most of us eventually found out, that paying monthly for a game where you spend most of your time semi-afk watching tv while doing the same boring repetitive bull*** over and over again is simply terrible. Most people moved on from mining to other activities and discovered how much fun eve can be. And you really want to force them all back into their barges by eliminating the alternatives to mining? Nope, noone expects you to mine a single rock. Keep flying around blowing things up and having fun, as normal. There is an alternative to mining already in place, buy the minerals.
If it is true that 74% of the minerals come frome drones, then buying will be very difficult once you eliminate the drone drops altogehter and the eve economy loses 74% of its base with a single blow. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind decreasing drone drops at all, but please, pretty please, only AFTER mining has been fixed and the economy can cope with that. Once ccp changes mining in a way that people want to mine again, it would be a whole different situation and I wouldn't mind myself having spent so many SP in scrapmetal reprocessing. As things are now, forcing people into mining again by eliminating the alternative ways to aquire the minerals would never bring enough people back to mining to satisfy the market's demand. It would be like asking the players to bot. And I don't like the idea of rogue drones being replaced by human bots. |

Severian Carnifex
70
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 08:14:00 -
[53] - Quote
Quote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:
This is an important part of fixing Mining. Minerals are not ISK but can be exchanged for ISK. When the amount of Minerals being brought in outstrips the amount being destroyed the price goes down and stockpiles rise.
Eliminating a major source of Minerals outside of Mining will thereby increase the value of the Minerals being Mined.
Mining Fixed.
I for one will never, ever set a foot into a mining barge again. I think most of us started of with mining, in a newbie mining corp. And most of us eventually found out, that paying monthly for a game where you spend most of your time semi-afk watching tv while doing the same boring repetitive bull*** over and over again is simply terrible. Most people moved on from mining to other activities and discovered how much fun eve can be. And you really want to force them all back into their barges by eliminating the alternatives to mining? Nope, noone expects you to mine a single rock. Keep flying around blowing things up and having fun, as normal. There is an alternative to mining already in place, buy the minerals. If it is true that 74% of the minerals come frome drones than buying will be very difficult once you eliminate the drone drops altogehter and the eve economy loses 74% of its base with a single blow. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind decreasing drone drops at all, but please, pretty please, only AFTER mining has been fixed and the economy can cope with that. Once ccp changes mining in a way that people want to mine again, it would be a whole different situation and I wouldn't mind myself having spent so many SP in scrapmetal reprocessing. As things are now, forcing people into mining again by eliminating the alternative ways to aquire the minerals would never bring enough people back to mining to satisfy the market's demand. It would be like asking the players to bot. And I don't like the idea of rogue drones being replaced by human bots.
CCP said that they are ok with mining like now and that dont want to make it more interactive... So thats the dead end. AND I DON'T WANT TO BE BROKE FOR NEXT 3-4 YEARS TILL CCP GETS SOME STUFF...
and... read this:
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:
And... what were prices of minerals before drone regions are introduced??? You see... we would get back at that state... and then was not this problems you are talking about...
yea... it would be one big BUM in prices for some time until all comes down to its place... but if all would come back around that numbers that was then...
and now i am feeling like ppl that was trying to prevent this economical crisis in world and no one wanted to listen... this state in which EVE is is like world economical crisis... and its killing eve...
We didn't have problems then... we would not have it now!!! So i don't give a damn how much % is from where! And i don't give a damn about other things... mining and industry allways suffers becouse that other things... But i don't know from where ppl pull out that number of 74%... that would mean that prices fell 4 times (400% down) after drone regions are introduced... and i think its max 50%...
And YOU CAN NOT MINE WITH GUNS!!!! **** drones... mining is here from beginning of game... and it can not be ruined by some new stuff CCP thinks its cool... If we could without drone minerals before... we can now too!!! |

Aquila Draco
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 11:09:00 -
[54] - Quote
Jooce McNasty wrote:Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with? Remove minerals from drone regions. Add in a new line of items like Rogue Drone - Weapon system Rogue Drone - Propultion System Rogue Drone - Navigation System Ect Ect Ect Then make is so you can reverse engineer a T2 drone and these rogue drone items and make a Faction style rogue drone.
The best thing would be that CCP make some new things to drop to remove minerals from dropping and reduce isk dropping... But better that drones drop isk then minerals!!!
I read in other thread about this subject that someone proposed that drones drop little of moon goo... That way moon goo would not be any more apsolutly in big alliance ownership... some small bit of it will be for small ppl to take... |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 11:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with?
Why replace it when there are already too many?
Mission loot amount/quality has already bean stick nerf -> less minerals
Market reaction: 0, nothing changed
Removal of drone alloys, needed
You can inject has many minerals has you want -in the process CCP replace alloys on the database for low lvl minerals please- so in the process the demand/offer is not sustainable for a lot of time. There are stock holders for gigantic amounts but it's only a matter of time and their interest is not to inject those on the market but to wait until prices raise.
The next minerals faucet I hope to see in game is the one mined by miners actually playing the game and not AFK or boting. |

1-Up Mushroom
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
93
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:09:00 -
[56] - Quote
Nothing, what more did you expect?  5 Senses In A Person... 4 Seasons In A Year... 3 Colors In A Stoplight... 2 Poles On The Earth... ONLY 1-UP MUSHROOM!!!-á If You Like My Sig, Like Me! |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
324
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:15:00 -
[57] - Quote
Sorry i am late, just completed my 30th horde for the day, netting me over a billion isk in sales of compounds, escelation sales and T2 salvage sales to Jita.
What are we talking about here? The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:19:00 -
[58] - Quote
You know, I think the drones should be left alone. Yeah they don't give isk, they give alloys. So, it doesn't make the alliance isk rich by ratting directly, but it ups their production capabilities. And, if they want good isk, they can just export them to high sec to sell. Putting a bounty on the drones just devalues the isk even more and causes a rise in inflation even more. The thing about the drone regions is that they're not creating too much new isk like, say for example, fountain. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
223
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:26:00 -
[59] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:You know, I think the drones should be left alone. Yeah they don't give isk, they give alloys. So, it doesn't make the alliance isk rich by ratting directly, but it ups their production capabilities. And, if they want good isk, they can just export them to high sec to sell. Putting a bounty on the drones just devalues the isk even more and causes a rise in inflation even more. The thing about the drone regions is that they're not creating too much new isk like, say for example, fountain.
the problem is drones completely devalue the mining industry...
give them a bounty and the occasional augmented Or integrated or harvestor drone as loot drops. Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless you are from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Rykuss
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 13:41:00 -
[60] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Rykuss wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote: I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part?
This is an important part of fixing Mining. Minerals are not ISK but can be exchanged for ISK. When the amount of Minerals being brought in outstrips the amount being destroyed the price goes down and stockpiles rise. Eliminating a major source of Minerals outside of Mining will thereby increase the value of the Minerals being Mined. Mining Fixed. I for one will never, ever set a foot into a mining barge again. I think most of us started of with mining, in a newbie mining corp. And most of us eventually found out, that paying monthly for a game where you spend most of your time semi-afk watching tv while doing the same boring repetitive bull*** over and over again is simply terrible. Most people moved on from mining to other activities and discovered how much fun eve can be. And you really want to force them all back into their barges by eliminating the alternatives to mining? Nope, noone expects you to mine a single rock. Keep flying around blowing things up and having fun, as normal. There is an alternative to mining already in place, buy the minerals. If it is true that 74% of the minerals come frome drones, then buying will be very difficult once you eliminate the drone drops altogehter and the eve economy loses 74% of its base with a single blow. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind decreasing drone drops at all, but please, pretty please, only AFTER mining has been fixed and the economy can cope with that. Once ccp changes mining in a way that people want to mine again, it would be a whole different situation and I wouldn't mind myself having spent so many SP in scrapmetal reprocessing. As things are now, forcing people into mining again by eliminating the alternative ways to aquire the minerals would never bring enough people back to mining to satisfy the market's demand. It would be like asking the players to bot. And I don't like the idea of rogue drones being replaced by human bots.
Again, noone would be forced to mine. Where does this come from? Why should there be an alternative to mining? Because you don't like it? That's not really an argument, it an excuse in my opinion. It would be like asking the players to bot? Really? Can I have your vindicator? |

Zimmy Zeta
Battle Force Industries
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 14:12:00 -
[61] - Quote
Rykuss wrote: -wall of text -
Hey, I am not your enemy here. I, too, think that mining should be worthwhile and already said that several times. But cutting off 74% of your vital supplies (still don't know if this number is correct) before you have any feasible idea how to compensate for that is just utter madness.
|

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 15:50:00 -
[62] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote:You know, I think the drones should be left alone. Yeah they don't give isk, they give alloys. So, it doesn't make the alliance isk rich by ratting directly, but it ups their production capabilities. And, if they want good isk, they can just export them to high sec to sell. Putting a bounty on the drones just devalues the isk even more and causes a rise in inflation even more. The thing about the drone regions is that they're not creating too much new isk like, say for example, fountain. the problem is drones completely devalue the mining industry... give them a bounty and the occasional augmented Or integrated or harvestor drone and mining laser and ice mining laser upgrades as loot drops.
No bots do it more. Besides, I'd rather have minerals remain as they are than devalue the isk at a faster rate than already. |

Rellik B00n
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 16:06:00 -
[63] - Quote
+1 for removing drone poop and replacing with bounties.
also, some of the reasons ive seen against doing this in this very thread are actually supporting it!
eg: "pvpers will not be happy when they have to pay double for their ships and mods" - guess what? That makes killing ships and looting them worth something again. If your ship is worth twice as much there is twice the buzz to a fight.
and so on.. |

Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
51
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 17:22:00 -
[64] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:David Grogan wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote:You know, I think the drones should be left alone. Yeah they don't give isk, they give alloys. So, it doesn't make the alliance isk rich by ratting directly, but it ups their production capabilities. And, if they want good isk, they can just export them to high sec to sell. Putting a bounty on the drones just devalues the isk even more and causes a rise in inflation even more. The thing about the drone regions is that they're not creating too much new isk like, say for example, fountain. the problem is drones completely devalue the mining industry... give them a bounty and the occasional augmented Or integrated or harvestor drone and mining laser and ice mining laser upgrades as loot drops. No bots do it more. Besides, I'd rather have minerals remain as they are than devalue the isk at a faster rate than already.
Yea, bots that are grinding drones do ti the most!!! Why do you think that much of minerals are from drones? The most of bots are there...
Removing mineral drops from drones will solve the biggest part of botting problem and mineral devaluation because of it...
|

bornaa
GRiD.
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 21:45:00 -
[65] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:David Grogan wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote:You know, I think the drones should be left alone. Yeah they don't give isk, they give alloys. So, it doesn't make the alliance isk rich by ratting directly, but it ups their production capabilities. And, if they want good isk, they can just export them to high sec to sell. Putting a bounty on the drones just devalues the isk even more and causes a rise in inflation even more. The thing about the drone regions is that they're not creating too much new isk like, say for example, fountain. the problem is drones completely devalue the mining industry... give them a bounty and the occasional augmented Or integrated or harvestor drone and mining laser and ice mining laser upgrades as loot drops. No bots do it more. Besides, I'd rather have minerals remain as they are than devalue the isk at a faster rate than already.
Just say it straight... I don't give a **** about no one, nor EVE itself, but myself...
And yea... we know... |

Rykuss
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 23:04:00 -
[66] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Rykuss wrote: -wall of text - Hey, I am not your enemy here. I, too, think that mining should be worthwhile and already said that several times. But cutting off 74% of your vital supplies (still don't know if this number is correct) before you have any feasible idea how to compensate for that is just utter madness.
The only thing that makes us enemies is your inability to accept that someone could have an opinion that differs from your own on the subject. Compensate for what exactly? Do you want to make mining more "interesting" and offer yet another alternative to aquiring minerals? If so, what would be the point? Those vital supplies are there, have been there and will always be there. Your assessment that "the sky is falling" is utter madness. Since my responses have been longer than five words, which you seem to have a problem with, I'll sum up.
You: "Stuff will cost more!"
Me: "So?" Can I have your vindicator? |

Sezdro
Shiny Toy Guns STR8NGE BREW
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 00:24:00 -
[67] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Razin wrote:Nothing wrong with a simplistic opinion. Adds variety.
Better a simple solution that gets things done then a unique one that has negative effects. There is a reason were flying around in 747's instead of really cool Zeppelins. There is no Reason a Raven should be able to out mine a Hulk.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I could of swore it took more skill points to kill rats/drones than sit around and watch your strip miners extract minerals.
I don't use a Raven, but I do solo drone patrols in a battleship for a decent bit of cash, and it took me a lot longer to get to that point than it would to train for a Hulk.
|

Rykuss
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 02:06:00 -
[68] - Quote
Sezdro wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Razin wrote:Nothing wrong with a simplistic opinion. Adds variety.
Better a simple solution that gets things done then a unique one that has negative effects. There is a reason were flying around in 747's instead of really cool Zeppelins. There is no Reason a Raven should be able to out mine a Hulk. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I could of swore it took more skill points to kill rats/drones than sit around and watch your strip miners extract minerals. I don't use a Raven, but I do solo drone patrols in a battleship for a decent bit of cash, and it took me a lot longer to get to that point than it would to train for a Hulk.
No, it didn't. Even remapped INT/MEM you can get a BS up and running faster than a hulk. Unless of course, you think you need large[insert specialisation of weapon V here] with all the bells and whistles. Why is it, do you suppose, that people go that route in the first place? Hmmm? It isn't just because they hate mining, although that's part of the reason. Can I have your vindicator? |

Sezdro
Shiny Toy Guns STR8NGE BREW
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 03:06:00 -
[69] - Quote
Rykuss wrote:Sezdro wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Razin wrote:Nothing wrong with a simplistic opinion. Adds variety.
Better a simple solution that gets things done then a unique one that has negative effects. There is a reason were flying around in 747's instead of really cool Zeppelins. There is no Reason a Raven should be able to out mine a Hulk. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I could of swore it took more skill points to kill rats/drones than sit around and watch your strip miners extract minerals. I don't use a Raven, but I do solo drone patrols in a battleship for a decent bit of cash, and it took me a lot longer to get to that point than it would to train for a Hulk. No, it didn't. Even remapped INT/MEM you can get a BS up and running faster than a hulk. Unless of course, you think you need large[insert specialisation of weapon V here] with all the bells and whistles. Why is it, do you suppose, that people go that route in the first place? Hmmm? It isn't just because they hate mining, although that's part of the reason.
ALL the bells and whistles, no, but just bare-bones requirements to use a BS would have you making less money through alloys than a hulk pilot through mining. Believe me, I was one of those bare-bones pilots for a bit.
Also, I figured people would tend to take their career in a more combat-oriented path rather than mining because it really is boring (although I could take some enjoyment in being productive in some way through mining), and because combat serves more purpose than just money-making. (I only have 1 account, so I decided to just go for combat on this one character rather than getting mining and then combat.) |

rodyas
The Scope Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 10:22:00 -
[70] - Quote
I was also thinking how the market has no reflection sometimes of the drones existing. Well just remembered the mineral contribution to the market drones have. But they have no modules that drop, like officer or faction ones. ie rogue tracking enhancer or such. Maybe drones could be given a new mineral drop that is like worth million is to make up for that. Or an officer version spawns and get 2 bilion worth of minerals from it, or a low cargo capacity alloy that is worth a billion or so. |

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 10:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
Sezdro wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Razin wrote:Nothing wrong with a simplistic opinion. Adds variety.
Better a simple solution that gets things done then a unique one that has negative effects. There is a reason were flying around in 747's instead of really cool Zeppelins. There is no Reason a Raven should be able to out mine a Hulk. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I could of swore it took more skill points to kill rats/drones than sit around and watch your strip miners extract minerals. I don't use a Raven, but I do solo drone patrols in a battleship for a decent bit of cash, and it took me a lot longer to get to that point than it would to train for a Hulk.
How I "love" ppl that write things that are lie only to prove their point... or just don't want to check and write everything only to feel important... And i know that for what you use/think/have/do is the longest path... allways... 
Try to use a little EVE-mon and see... then you write... You will see that that your BS you got into is not so hard to get... Even that "lame Hulk" is ship that you need more effort to drive... yea, even that ****** ship that give you 4 times less isk... and in mining... like you use your BS for.. mining... mining by killing... And... who won the reward for the biggest carebear... congratulations... ppl that MINE IN BS won it!!!
And about that your thesis that more SP you need for something more different things you have to do..
Logic of all other ppl in all games would be that that thing your ship is for with more SP you do better and better and not spreading their usage...
But with that yours logic...
With that yours logic... for example... Titan should do everything in game because you need the most SP in game... - so it should be the best killing beast for frigates/cruisers/BC/BS/Dreads/carriers and SC and do it better then any other ships on eve... it shulkd kill 10000000 frigates with one shoot... - so it should be the best miner... at least 10000X better yield then hulk... in few minutes you mine for production of another titan... thats only fair... - so it should be the best indy platform... because you need so much SP Titan must do research of Blueprints, copying of blueprints, productions all all things in eve (from ammo and t1/t2 things to capitals), invention... and i have to invest no minerals or time in it... because i am soooo cool with having so much SP in titan that i should all get free and without waiting... - well... if i need so much SP for it... i must be the best trader when i have it... i must have have access to all markets in the same time... and i need at least get 90% discount for all things (if not free)... - I am so cool with my all bunch of SP and titan that i must not haul anything because i am ultimate hauler... so all things that i need appear in my cargo right away... - I am the best scanner then too... all that i want is on my overview in i just appear there where i want...
so why would you play eve then???
and then Hulk needs to kill things the same as BS... because you need around the same amount of SP... Make Hulk DPS/tank on the range of BS and you don't need change nothing on this subject...
But you know... that your thesis would kill EVE... but... who cares... "I have that much SP i should do all"...
p.s. That your BS is ****... CCP need to delete all others ships from EVE because the only ship that you need is Titan...
|

Freyya
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 11:11:00 -
[72] - Quote
If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing. |

Freyya
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 11:14:00 -
[73] - Quote
Freyya wrote:If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing.
it might be extraction from salvaging, not drops, haven't been shooting drones in a long long time. Crap, ment edit, sorry. |

dischordia
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 11:54:00 -
[74] - Quote
Freyya wrote:Freyya wrote:If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing. it might be extraction from salvaging, not drops, haven't been shooting drones in a long long time. Crap, ment edit, sorry.
the drone parts come from the "commander" spawns and tbh you cant GIVE them away as they are worth fudge all due to the stuff they make sucking so bad and costing so damn much |

Jacabon Mere
Capital Storm. Shadow of xXDEATHXx
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 11:55:00 -
[75] - Quote
Sentient drones drop the drone parts. |

Freyya
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 12:42:00 -
[76] - Quote
dischordia wrote:Freyya wrote:Freyya wrote:If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing. it might be extraction from salvaging, not drops, haven't been shooting drones in a long long time. Crap, ment edit, sorry. the drone parts come from the "commander" spawns and tbh you cant GIVE them away as they are worth fudge all due to the stuff they make sucking so bad and costing so damn much
Well it could then be a good incentive to make it less suck, distribute drone parts more to make it cost less and uhmmm....uhmmm. EPA?No... Damn, can't remember the 3rd thing, sorry.....oops. |

dischordia
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 12:49:00 -
[77] - Quote
Freyya wrote:dischordia wrote:Freyya wrote:Freyya wrote:If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing. it might be extraction from salvaging, not drops, haven't been shooting drones in a long long time. Crap, ment edit, sorry. the drone parts come from the "commander" spawns and tbh you cant GIVE them away as they are worth fudge all due to the stuff they make sucking so bad and costing so damn much Well it could then be a good incentive to make it less suck, distribute drone parts more to make it cost less and uhmmm....uhmmm. EPA?No... Damn, can't remember the 3rd thing, sorry.....oops.
the prob is that the "faction" drones are not as good as compared to there t2 counterparts for the bang for your Isk ratio style analogy hell even the empire faction drones are worse than there t2 counterparts for isk spent, this is something that needs to be looked over asap imho
|

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 14:49:00 -
[78] - Quote
dischordia wrote:Freyya wrote:dischordia wrote:Freyya wrote:Freyya wrote:If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing. it might be extraction from salvaging, not drops, haven't been shooting drones in a long long time. Crap, ment edit, sorry. the drone parts come from the "commander" spawns and tbh you cant GIVE them away as they are worth fudge all due to the stuff they make sucking so bad and costing so damn much Well it could then be a good incentive to make it less suck, distribute drone parts more to make it cost less and uhmmm....uhmmm. EPA?No... Damn, can't remember the 3rd thing, sorry.....oops. the prob is that the "faction" drones are not as good as compared to there t2 counterparts for the bang for your Isk ratio style analogy hell even the empire faction drones are worse than there t2 counterparts for isk spent, this is something that needs to be looked over asap imho
Then boost faction drones... non empire faction little more then empire faction... and you have one nice boost to prices of that parts... that would be one part of compensation for removed minerals... |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
720
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 17:58:00 -
[79] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:whats the difference about monetary inflation and devaluation of some goods??? I don't see a difference... minerals ARE isk for indy ppl!!!
+1 |

BigCountry
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 21:07:00 -
[80] - Quote
Freyya wrote:If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing.
This is a horrible idea, I'm sorry......
The way PvE makes money in drone region is this ....
1. Rat and loot Drone Battleships... 2. Decide whether you want to just sell alloys or refine and manufacture something to sell The good thing about this choice is that your options are plentiful... either someone will buy your alloys for the minerals for themself to build something , OR you build something that others will want to buy ...
With your idea the options are reduced to almost nothing ... Either i sell the drone parts or I build the special drones and sell them... The problem is that both options are very limited in customer base...
Other space PvE --- You go kill battleships and use ISK to buy whatever you want ... and you dont have to loot and haul anything to make it...
The only ones affected by alloys are miners and last I looked Trit and other low ends are higher then they have been in a long time so there is still money to be made in mining ..... high ends prices have nothing to do with alloys... |

BigCountry
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 21:11:00 -
[81] - Quote
I also wanted to add for all those who say " get rid of alloys"
There are not enough miners in EVE to mine enough to compensate for the decrease in minerals on the market this would cause .. not to mention the prices of minerals would go up by alot and that means alot of other prices would go up... So again this only helps miners .. and im sorry I dont see how this is a good thing ... With alloys in the game it helps keep costs down.. |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 22:11:00 -
[82] - Quote
BigCountry wrote:Freyya wrote:If i recall correctly drones also dropped drone parts used in manufacturing right? How about you drop the minerals and put it into full drone drops, add bp's or copies for rogue drones re-engeneered for capsuleer use with specific properties not found in regular or faction drones. Sure at first the prices would be quite high but seeing high/low and nullsec has drone plexes there wouldn't be a huge advantage for only the drone regions.
It would give a new manufacturing "mini game" much like invention for t2 did. Hell, make it like invention requiring more work than just plain manufacturing. This is a horrible idea, I'm sorry...... The way PvE makes money in drone region is this .... 1. Rat and loot Drone Battleships... 2. Decide whether you want to just sell alloys or refine and manufacture something to sell The good thing about this choice is that your options are plentiful... either someone will buy your alloys for the minerals for themself to build something , OR you build something that others will want to buy ... With your idea the options are reduced to almost nothing ... Either i sell the drone parts or I build the special drones and sell them... The problem is that both options are very limited in customer base... Other space PvE --- You go kill battleships and use ISK to buy whatever you want ... and you dont have to loot and haul anything to make it... The only ones affected by alloys are miners and last I looked Trit and other low ends are higher then they have been in a long time so there is still money to be made in mining ..... high ends prices have nothing to do with alloys...
LOL... some ppl like to act that they have no brain... or don't have a clue about EVE market and mineral prices... But... they need to write so that they look smart and be vets...  Or they don't give a damn about anything because their botts do their work so they don't need to look at prices... and now they are afraid that something will be changed and they will need to buy/program new botts...
Prices of minerals are at lowest levels... and everybody knows that only you are saying that's not the case...
And you are so in drones and don't know how they influenced mineral prices when they were introduced... Zydrine & Megacyte prices tumbled by about 2/3 within 3 months of the drone regions being introduced... And prices of low ends fell a less... but still so much...
And Zydrine and Megacyte are soooo low end minerals by you... because you say that prices of high ends have nothing with alloys... 
So please... if you want to make some TV novel that will lead ppl to miss-conclusion... do your homework...
And about "we need to have a choice and miners can **** themselfs" Lets turn that back... and give drone regions something that will make them so unprofitable because at the same time we will introduce worm-regions that will give 4X more of that same loot... Then I will say... "no... don't help them because wee need to have a choice... we need to build, sell, bott... and i saw prices... they are not that bad even they fell 3 times so there is money"
|

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 22:21:00 -
[83] - Quote
BigCountry wrote:I also wanted to add for all those who say " get rid of alloys"
There are not enough miners in EVE to mine enough to compensate for the decrease in minerals on the market this would cause .. not to mention the prices of minerals would go up by alot and that means alot of other prices would go up... So again this only helps miners .. and im sorry I dont see how this is a good thing ... With alloys in the game it helps keep costs down..
And about cost of things... yea... all in eve is so expensive  EVE could use bugger prices... so that we can see peoples to use ships that are in this game and not only few the best and most $$$ ships with at deadspace fit. you know... there was nothing wrong with eve and before drone regions. and things were not so $$$$ what peoples like you are saying to deceive people. or lack of SC blobs is so bad?
And you know... when you produce something somewhere else for 5 times less investments... people will stop produce it on that first place where is that investment 5 times bigger.
And this "this only helps miners": That i can say for you too... So... lets nerf drone regions 10 times... that only hurts peoples in drone regions... and that is better you know... because it hurts the most of botts in eve... so... lets do it... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1562
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 22:27:00 -
[84] - Quote
BigCountry wrote:I also wanted to add for all those who say " get rid of alloys"
There are not enough miners in EVE to mine enough to compensate for the decrease in minerals on the market this would cause Yes there are. They're just not doing any mining because it's a waste of time when other sources of minerals are providing so much more.
Quote:not to mention the prices of minerals would go up by alot and that means GǪit would be worth mining again so people would hop to it, and that would bring the prices down again. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

BuckStrider
Hardcore p0wnography
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.19 22:27:00 -
[85] - Quote
Razin wrote:Severian Carnifex wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:Get rid of mineral drops from drones!!!! Yea... mineral faucet from drones must be removed... Not that I mind, but what other faucet would you replace it with?
ISK stupid, just like every other k-space rat |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
723
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 00:23:00 -
[86] - Quote
CCP just don't listen... They never give a damn about indy ppl... :( now they buff metal scraps (volume of 0.01)... and that is directly nerf to mining... :/ so... CCP is playing with indy nerves...
|

Joshua Aivoras
Tech IV Industries Pandorum Invictus
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 05:08:00 -
[87] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Sakurako Kimino wrote:drone regions need to be changed, how, i am not 100% sure but i do think give the npc bountys and bring the alloys inine with module drops from the other nul sec regions.
.... I don't understand. Why the drone regions? Mining is broken, not the drone regions. CCP should fix mining and make it worthwhile again. So many people harvest drone alloys for a reason: because it is more efficient and less tedious than mining. The problem is mining. Drone harvesting is working, mining is not. So why get rid of the working part instead of fixing the broken part?
Boring or nigh, Mining used to be much, much more profitable before the drone regions were introduced into Eve.
|

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
371
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 05:32:00 -
[88] - Quote
Joshua Aivoras wrote: Boring or nigh, Mining used to be much, much more profitable before the drone regions were introduced into Eve.
Yes and no.
2007, ISK/m3 for hi-sec ores was generally between 65-110 (Omber was king of the hill at around 105-110 due to Isogen prices).
2008 - after the drone regions came online and a few other changes, tritanium crashed to about 2.25-2.35 range and a lot of hi-sec ores struggled to reach 80 ISK/m3 (Veld was a miserable 60-65 ISK/m3).
2009 - I recall lo-sec ores (Jasp, Hedb, Hemo) all being slightly worthelss (in the 60-100 ISK/m3 range), which was the same as you could get in hi-sec for a lot less risk (hi-sec ores were all 85-100 ISK/m3).
Right now, things are pretty even keel for hi-sec ores, with most of them in a narrow 90-105 ISK/m3 range. The laggard is still Omber at 70-ish, and Pyrox is up around 110-120 ISK/m3. Lo-sec ores are in the 150-175 ISK/m3 range. The ABCs are about 250-350 ISK/m3 (based on empire mineral values).
(Anyone have hard numbers for what the mineral prices were back in '05 and '06?)
Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing alloys turned down and reprocessing made more difficult - but I don't think turning that spigot off all at once would be good for the economy. Better to turn it down gradually (and figure out what else the drones could drop to keep income up). |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
724
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 09:18:00 -
[89] - Quote
Look at SISI... they changed a little reprocessing value of alloys... little less hi-ends... and much more low ends... so... they decided to kill hi-sec mining completely and this will not help low/0.0... and what i know about CCP... one time they do a little tweak that is fixed... and they will get back to it soonTM (never) and they can say we helped... you helped a squat...
@ CCP you want to remove mining from EVE???
I ask because i see that you are nerfing it for years and just giving other professions more and more minerals and making them easier to get to it... About drone loot... are you laughing in miners face when doing all this to us... and this "changes" are kick under the belt... like "we did something"... And then this metal scraps buff... that's so low... more and more minerals from not-mining...
If you want to kill mining and remove it from game... just say it... But in this conditions i demand my SP invested in mining back... |

dischordia
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 15:15:00 -
[90] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:Look at SISI... they changed a little reprocessing value of alloys... little less hi-ends... and much more low ends... so... they decided to kill hi-sec mining completely and this will not help low/0.0... and what i know about CCP... one time they do a little tweak that is fixed... and they will get back to it soonTM (never) and they can say we helped... you helped a squat...
@ CCP you want to remove mining from EVE???
I ask because i see that you are nerfing it for years and just giving other professions more and more minerals and making them easier to get to it... About drone loot... are you laughing in miners face when doing all this to us... and this "changes" are kick under the belt... like "we did something"... And then this metal scraps buff... that's so low... more and more minerals from not-mining...
If you want to kill mining and remove it from game... just say it... But in this conditions i demand my SP invested in mining back...
Currently on sisi you get 27 trit extra for refining one of each drone alloy in one go but doing them seperately you get the same as tq is so i dont know where you say that more is gout of the low ends and less high ends. it seems like a bug but well im not sure ... its reported anyway |

Long John Silver
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 16:35:00 -
[91] - Quote
Some suggestions for things that the drone regions sub-species of drone could drop, instead of minerals:
Genetically Modified Cattle Dolls Jovian blood drops and bone splinters Melted snowballs Python mine BPO's Groups of Janitors

Long John Silver | Pirate Alt-áand Forum Troll. |

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 22:19:00 -
[92] - Quote
I apologize for the length of this post to those that do have a concept of Supply & Demand and have constructively contributed to the discussion. It seems there are too many trolls with a political axe to grind or no understanding of the S&D concept. Forget the fact that they just so happen to come from the Drone regions. The fact is that alloys, regardless of where they are sourced, represent a massive amount of low end construction minerals in this game. An amount so significant that, without CCP increasing either the refining yields or total quantity of ore in the game or both, their removal would have a significant inflationary effect on the value of minerals as well as everything that requires minerals in their construction. It can be simply said that with no other changes other than the removal of alloys, meaningful price inflation at all levels of the supply chain will occur. If demand remains constant and supply is cut, prices increase.
What people need to remember is that alloys are generally biased toward the higher volume construction-related minerals. They include little in the way of high ends like megacyte and zydrine, which were nerfed well over a year ago in favor of higher amounts of lower end minerals. If you recall at that time, CCP cut the Meta 0 drops in missions, increased certain mid-range mining yields and changed aloys by reducing high ends in favor of low ends. CCP's purpose was clear: put the courcing of industrial related minerals in the hands of miners everywhere and ratter in the drone regions. When you see the price of alloys like plush at 25,000 isk (Jita 11/20) approxitately 72% its value is in the 4,096 units of trit (3.33) and 1024 units of Pyerite (4.25). The 4 units of Zydrine (798) constitutes only 12.8% of the value of one unit of plush. Megacyte (2825), of which only 1 units is derived from each unit of Glossy compound (27400), only accounts for 10.3% of Glossy's value.
So the real question with all the ranting in this thread is which mineral are you "industrialists" trying to save by eliminating alloys? Because if it is high ends, then removing alloys from the game will have little to no impact on the prices of megacyte or Zydrine. The prices of these minerals were devalued by the inclusion of hidden belts, which resulted in a vast amount of supply put on the market as regions all over New Eden gained virtually unimpeded access to minerals they may have previously not been afforded in their region. As a reminder, not all 0.0 regions in Eve had broad access to every high-end ore prior to the introduction of hidden belts. Yet today, claiming sov and installing an infrastructure hub gives any miner in 0.0 access to reasonably significant quantities of these valuable ores. Also note that hidden belts are primarily mined for their high-end output as there are not significant quantities of low ends like Trit, Pyer or Mex found in them.
So where are we today in terms of the mineral prices most effected by alloys? 12 months ago Tritanium was selling for roughly 2.20 isk p/u. On Jan 1, 2011 the average price of trit in Jita was 2.22. By March 1, 2001 the price increased to 3.19, a 43.6% increase. Since that time its value has increased more modestly, hitting an average daily high above 3.50 and currently selling for about 3.33 or 50% above where it was exactly one year ago. High sec trit miners should be rejoicing. Pyerite was selling at 3.77 on average a year ago and today is at 4.30 (a 14% increase over year ago figures). We all know the ride Nocxium took over the last year (currently up 44% Y-O-Y) but even the year ago price is significantly higher than it was 18-24 months ago. The fact is that the minerals that drive the price of alloys and are most used in manufacturing, have risen over the past year.
In the end, mineral values are driven by supply and demand. It is obvious that with rising prices for construction-related minerals, the continued existence of alloys is not creating downward pressure on low end mineral prices. The case can be made that the introduction of the drone regions years ago did in fact cause the value of many minerals to fall. But this was the result of the introduction of a completely new source of supply in the form of both alloys and mineable resources. Yes, they have mining belts too. But at the same time, the Eve universe of players and buildable items has also expanded, thus creating an offsetting increase in demand. Fully offsetting? Perhaps not completely. But while the drone regions may generate a significant amount of mineral supply, they do so in a way that requires more than just killing NPCs and automatically collecting isk. Logistics or the ability to add value through production are both key to seeing isk hit the wallets of players in the drone regions. On top of this, every bit of isk derived from alloys, as with mining in Eve, does not act as an isk faucet. Thus, increased isk in the game is not generated by the activities of the drone regions. Isk merely changes hands with regard to the mining/ratting/production that takes place there.
In the end, if alloys are removed, the drone regions will need to become bounty space, as are all other regions of 0.0, or become a dead zone. Each has its own significant ramifications for the broader universe of Eve. If the drone regions become bountry space, an entirely new isk faucet will be created, one larger than the introduciton of Incursions. As more isk magically enters the game, this this will have an inflationary impact on the price of everything. As with any economy, if you simply print more money, the value of goods moves higher. If alloys are removed but the drones do not become bounty space, this would result in pushing a large number of players into other areas of space, creating more competition for the now more limited resources available in the game. Neither of these are necessarily positive outcomes for the broader market economy. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
923
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 22:21:00 -
[93] - Quote
tl;dr |

SFM Hobb3s
Vanguard Frontiers Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 23:34:00 -
[94] - Quote
All you people complaining about how drone regions are so great and are destroying the mineral market...
BTW Drone regions have been broken for years. The alliances who have found success in these regions considering, deserve a tip of the hat for being successful there.
Drone poop is ALL that drone regions has. Nothing else. There are no bounties, no sec status changes for ratting. Exploration is broken to hell (you can even find the odd mag site, which gives you nothing of value btw, and, unlike all other mag sites, it requires a CODEBREAKER to complete!!!). We also get no shiny faction or deadspace modules, and have to settle for mediocre t2 loot drops. You'll never see any officer loot from drone regions either. Doesn't exist.
I do wonder what would happen if they stopped being the dominant supplier of mins. Yes, the mins market would definitely go up, but my guess is, the prices of everything else would too. For people who like to pvp, it's nice to be able to buy ships cheaply, I wouldn't want this to get worse. |

Severian Carnifex
75
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 23:43:00 -
[95] - Quote
SFM Hobb3s wrote:All you people complaining about how drone regions are so great and are destroying the mineral market...
BTW Drone regions have been broken for years. The alliances who have found success in these regions considering, deserve a tip of the hat for being successful there.
Drone poop is ALL that drone regions has. Nothing else. There are no bounties, no sec status changes for ratting. Exploration is broken to hell (you can even find the odd mag site, which gives you nothing of value btw, and, unlike all other mag sites, it requires a CODEBREAKER to complete!!!). We also get no shiny faction or deadspace modules, and have to settle for mediocre t2 loot drops. You'll never see any officer loot from drone regions either. Doesn't exist.
I do wonder what would happen if they stopped being the dominant supplier of mins. Yes, the mins market would definitely go up, but my guess is, the prices of everything else would too. For people who like to pvp, it's nice to be able to buy ships cheaply, I wouldn't want this to get worse.
THINGS IN EVE ARE TOO CHEAP  ok?
and prices would not (unfortunately) go up like you all saying to scare ppl because miners in EVE that forgot about their many millions of SP in mining because you ruined it will get back to mining and compensate that short term mineral shortage...
you know, you're not irreplaceable... like you want to think about yourself... |

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 07:13:00 -
[96] - Quote
Severian - you are correct, we are not irreplaceable. But neither are miners. If CCP wants to put minerals in the game it will find a way. But what you and many others are asking is for CCP to make your game play style more profitable at the expense of someone else. Quit being a hater and figure out how to play the game to your advantage.
The problem isn't the number of miners. It is the volume of minerasls required to supply the market. There is simly not enough available ore to be mined in the existing belts. Worse yet, there isn't enough ore for hisec miners where competition in the belts is much higher than in null sec. For example:
1 million m3 of Veldpsar = 10 million units = 30 million trit at perfect refine. Assuming you mine in a hulk with T2 crystals, a 5% implant and 2 minute cycles from a rorqual, each hulk brings in 56,040 units per cycle or 1,681,200 units per hour. That does not include any time for changing targets, hauling, or moving to a new belt. If you have 2 miners plus the rorqual pilot, it will take you 3 hours.
30 million trit = 7,324 units of plush compound. This can be done by a two man gang in 1 carrier and 1 noctis in the same 3 hours.
So both can do about the same amount of trit over 3 hours. But the real question is: where will the miner find 10 million units of Veldspar? Not in any single system in the game today and certainly not on a repeatable basis. What I failed to mention in the above example is that the ratting pilot will also take in other minerals, such as 7.5 million units of Pyerite, 1.7 million units of mexallon and on down the line. The point is that CCP would need to do far more than just remove alloys. They would need to increase the size of the existing belts in terms of ore amounts and probably increase the refining yields to make up for the loss of alloys.
Maybe we should let alloys stay but CCP can tax the ratters and give it to the miners. The we can create a welfare system in Eve. Or how about this: Get rid of all alloys and let mining be the only place you get get minerals. But in return, CCP removes all ore from hisec. Mining will only exist in lowsec and null sec space. If it is that profitable then it shouldn't be in hisec anyway. Deal?
My Christmas wish - CCP gives the drone regions bounties so I can be like everyone else and not have to work for my isk. Second, CCP gives me free kills because PL gets more than I do. Its only fair. |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
729
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 13:04:00 -
[97] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote:Severian - you are correct, we are not irreplaceable. But neither are miners. If CCP wants to put minerals in the game it will find a way. But what you and many others are asking is for CCP to make your game play style more profitable at the expense of someone else. Quit being a hater and figure out how to play the game to your advantage.
The problem isn't the number of miners. It is the volume of minerals required to supply the market. There is simply not enough available ore to be mined in the existing belts. Worse yet, there isn't enough ore for hisec miners where competition in the belts is much higher than in null sec. For example:
1 million m3 of Veldpsar = 10 million units = 30 million trit at perfect refine. Assuming you mine in a hulk with T2 crystals, a 5% implant and 2 minute cycles from a rorqual, each hulk brings in 56,040 units per cycle or 1,681,200 units per hour. That does not include any time for changing targets, hauling, or moving to a new belt. If you have 2 miners plus the rorqual pilot, it will take you 3 hours.
30 million trit = 7,324 units of plush compound. This can be done by a two man gang in 1 carrier and 1 noctis in the same 3 hours.
So both can do about the same amount of trit over 3 hours. But the real question is: where will the miner find 10 million units of Veldspar? Not in any single system in the game today and certainly not on a repeatable basis. What I failed to mention in the above example is that the ratting pilot will also take in other minerals, such as 7.5 million units of Pyerite, 1.7 million units of mexallon and on down the line. The point is that CCP would need to do far more than just remove alloys. They would need to increase the size of the existing belts in terms of ore amounts and probably increase the refining yields to make up for the loss of alloys.
Maybe we should let alloys stay but CCP can tax the ratters and give it to the miners. The we can create a welfare system in Eve. Or how about this: Get rid of all alloys and let mining be the only place you get get minerals. But in return, CCP removes all ore from hisec. Mining will only exist in lowsec and null sec space. If it is that profitable then it shouldn't be in hisec anyway. Deal?
My Christmas wish - CCP gives the drone regions bounties so I can be like everyone else and not have to work for my isk. Second, CCP gives me free kills because PL gets more than I do. Its only fair.
And you again don't see a problem? 1 capital combat-support ship and 1 salvager mine more then 1 capital mining-support ship and 2 T2 mining ships... 
And we are here talking about mining |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
146
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 14:10:00 -
[98] - Quote
Didn't see anyone posting this yet so here goes:
CCP Spitfire wrote:-Ü-¦-¦ -+ -+-¦-¦-ë-¦-+, -¦-ï-¦-+-¦-¦-ï-¦-¦-Ä -¦-Ç-¦-é-¦-â-Ä -¦-ï-¦-+-+-¦-â -é-¦-+-ï -+-Ç-+ -¦-+-+-+-+-¦-+-ï-¦ -+-â-é-+ -â-+-â-ç-ê-¦-+-+-Å -¦-Ç-+-+--Ç-¦-¦-+-+-+-+-¦ -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+ -Å-+-ï-¦-¦; -¦-+-+-+-Å -¦-ï-+-¦ -+-é-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-¦-+-¦ -+-¦-+-+-ü-Ç-¦-¦-ü-é-¦-¦-+-+-+ CCP Greyscale. -ó-¦-¦ -¦-¦-¦ -+-é-¦-¦-é-ï -+-é -Ç-¦-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-é-ç-+-¦-+-¦ -¦ -ì-é-+-¦ -é-¦-+-¦ -é-¦-¦-¦-¦ -¦-â-¦-â-é -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+, -+-¦-ü-â-¦-¦-¦-+-+-¦, -¦-â-+-¦-Ä, -+-+-¦-¦-é -ü-+-ï-ü-+ -+-Ç-+-¦-+-+-¦-¦-é-î -¦ -+-Ç-¦-¦-ï-¦-â-ë-¦-¦ -é-¦-+-¦. --- As promised, here is a brief summary of the "Drone regions improvement suggestions" thread in the Russian General Discussion forum section. BackgroundPerceived disparity of income in drone regions compared to the GÇ£bountyGÇ¥ null-sec:
- Income in the drone regions is lower than in other null-sec (especially after the Drone Horde fixes and buffs of other anomalies)
- GÇ£GunminingGÇ¥ makes looting mandatory => need to operate extra accounts
- Lack of exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.)
Solutions
- Replace alloys with bounties comparable to other null-sec regions; at the same time, introduce other means for mineral compression [so that the existing player-built infrastructure is not wasted]
- Replace alloys with tags / other sellable items (similar to overseer effects) / BPCs for drone ships and equipment [introduction of CONCORD-purchasable drone drops can be role-played accordingly]
- Reduce the ratio of high-end minerals in the drone alloys [so that there is less dependency on drone regions for all minerals]
- Introduce faction / officer drone modules [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Introduce [mineral] convoys in drone regions [to counterbalance the lack of mineral supply if the alloys are changed to bounties]
- Introduce drone exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Increase the volume of alloys to be consistent with regular mining [so that mining does not become obsolete]
- Add non-drone anomalies to drone regions (similar to drone anomalies in the rest of null-sec) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Shuffle the drone regions around the map instead of clustering them all together [so that one group does not control the majority of the mineral supply]
- Replace alloys with T2 salvage or augmented drone components [so that the players can still contribute to the economy and get reasonable income]
- Make the GÇ£fast-trackGÇ¥ Drone Horde completion legal, essentially keeping the current status quo (while moving the escalation triggers to 10/10 complexes onto other anomalies) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Boost other high-end drone anomalies (Drone Patrols) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Add more drone/fighter/FB modifications to the game that would utilize drone components and create unique incentives in the drone regions [so that drone regions still produce something of considerable demand]
- Differentiate drone loot depending on the means used to destroy the rogue drone (killing w/ blasters or thermal missiles yield alloys, killing w/ projectiles or explosive/kinetic weapons yield modules, lasers or EM missiles yield drone components)
Potential IssuesIf the alloys will be replaced with bounties, will the following game elements be featured?
- Drone NPC regions
- Faction items
- Officers
WonGÇÖt the removal of alloys create a massive mineral deficit in the game; in the same vein, addition of drone bounties may lead to a massive inflation spike? In addition, PVE in drone regions is considered to be less prone to botting compared to other null-sec regionsGeneral Ideas and Feedback
- Introduce more randomness to anomalies (% chance for extra spawns, other faction encounters within a given anomaly, etc. )
- Botting is obviously perceived as a serious issue with null-sec in general
- More ISK sinks are needed GÇô e.g. introduce supercapital maintenance costs, etc.
- Make regions more diverse (unique loot, etc.) without creating a dependency of the whole game on any one region
|

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 14:24:00 -
[99] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Didn't see anyone posting this yet so here goes: CCP Spitfire wrote:-Ü-¦-¦ -+ -+-¦-¦-ë-¦-+, -¦-ï-¦-+-¦-¦-ï-¦-¦-Ä -¦-Ç-¦-é-¦-â-Ä -¦-ï-¦-+-+-¦-â -é-¦-+-ï -+-Ç-+ -¦-+-+-+-+-¦-+-ï-¦ -+-â-é-+ -â-+-â-ç-ê-¦-+-+-Å -¦-Ç-+-+--Ç-¦-¦-+-+-+-+-¦ -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+ -Å-+-ï-¦-¦; -¦-+-+-+-Å -¦-ï-+-¦ -+-é-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-¦-+-¦ -+-¦-+-+-ü-Ç-¦-¦-ü-é-¦-¦-+-+-+ CCP Greyscale. -ó-¦-¦ -¦-¦-¦ -+-é-¦-¦-é-ï -+-é -Ç-¦-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-é-ç-+-¦-+-¦ -¦ -ì-é-+-¦ -é-¦-+-¦ -é-¦-¦-¦-¦ -¦-â-¦-â-é -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+, -+-¦-ü-â-¦-¦-¦-+-+-¦, -¦-â-+-¦-Ä, -+-+-¦-¦-é -ü-+-ï-ü-+ -+-Ç-+-¦-+-+-¦-¦-é-î -¦ -+-Ç-¦-¦-ï-¦-â-ë-¦-¦ -é-¦-+-¦. --- As promised, here is a brief summary of the "Drone regions improvement suggestions" thread in the Russian General Discussion forum section. BackgroundPerceived disparity of income in drone regions compared to the GÇ£bountyGÇ¥ null-sec:
- Income in the drone regions is lower than in other null-sec (especially after the Drone Horde fixes and buffs of other anomalies)
- GÇ£GunminingGÇ¥ makes looting mandatory => need to operate extra accounts
- Lack of exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.)
Solutions
- Replace alloys with bounties comparable to other null-sec regions; at the same time, introduce other means for mineral compression [so that the existing player-built infrastructure is not wasted]
- Replace alloys with tags / other sellable items (similar to overseer effects) / BPCs for drone ships and equipment [introduction of CONCORD-purchasable drone drops can be role-played accordingly]
- Reduce the ratio of high-end minerals in the drone alloys [so that there is less dependency on drone regions for all minerals]
- Introduce faction / officer drone modules [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Introduce [mineral] convoys in drone regions [to counterbalance the lack of mineral supply if the alloys are changed to bounties]
- Introduce drone exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Increase the volume of alloys to be consistent with regular mining [so that mining does not become obsolete]
- Add non-drone anomalies to drone regions (similar to drone anomalies in the rest of null-sec) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Shuffle the drone regions around the map instead of clustering them all together [so that one group does not control the majority of the mineral supply]
- Replace alloys with T2 salvage or augmented drone components [so that the players can still contribute to the economy and get reasonable income]
- Make the GÇ£fast-trackGÇ¥ Drone Horde completion legal, essentially keeping the current status quo (while moving the escalation triggers to 10/10 complexes onto other anomalies) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Boost other high-end drone anomalies (Drone Patrols) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Add more drone/fighter/FB modifications to the game that would utilize drone components and create unique incentives in the drone regions [so that drone regions still produce something of considerable demand]
- Differentiate drone loot depending on the means used to destroy the rogue drone (killing w/ blasters or thermal missiles yield alloys, killing w/ projectiles or explosive/kinetic weapons yield modules, lasers or EM missiles yield drone components)
Potential IssuesIf the alloys will be replaced with bounties, will the following game elements be featured?
- Drone NPC regions
- Faction items
- Officers
WonGÇÖt the removal of alloys create a massive mineral deficit in the game; in the same vein, addition of drone bounties may lead to a massive inflation spike? In addition, PVE in drone regions is considered to be less prone to botting compared to other null-sec regionsGeneral Ideas and Feedback
- Introduce more randomness to anomalies (% chance for extra spawns, other faction encounters within a given anomaly, etc. )
- Botting is obviously perceived as a serious issue with null-sec in general
- More ISK sinks are needed GÇô e.g. introduce supercapital maintenance costs, etc.
- Make regions more diverse (unique loot, etc.) without creating a dependency of the whole game on any one region
Thnx for that...  now i need to study it... |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 14:25:00 -
[100] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Didn't see anyone posting this yet so here goes: CCP Spitfire wrote:-Ü-¦-¦ -+ -+-¦-¦-ë-¦-+, -¦-ï-¦-+-¦-¦-ï-¦-¦-Ä -¦-Ç-¦-é-¦-â-Ä -¦-ï-¦-+-+-¦-â -é-¦-+-ï -+-Ç-+ -¦-+-+-+-+-¦-+-ï-¦ -+-â-é-+ -â-+-â-ç-ê-¦-+-+-Å -¦-Ç-+-+--Ç-¦-¦-+-+-+-+-¦ -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+ -Å-+-ï-¦-¦; -¦-+-+-+-Å -¦-ï-+-¦ -+-é-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-¦-+-¦ -+-¦-+-+-ü-Ç-¦-¦-ü-é-¦-¦-+-+-+ CCP Greyscale. -ó-¦-¦ -¦-¦-¦ -+-é-¦-¦-é-ï -+-é -Ç-¦-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-é-ç-+-¦-+-¦ -¦ -ì-é-+-¦ -é-¦-+-¦ -é-¦-¦-¦-¦ -¦-â-¦-â-é -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+, -+-¦-ü-â-¦-¦-¦-+-+-¦, -¦-â-+-¦-Ä, -+-+-¦-¦-é -ü-+-ï-ü-+ -+-Ç-+-¦-+-+-¦-¦-é-î -¦ -+-Ç-¦-¦-ï-¦-â-ë-¦-¦ -é-¦-+-¦. --- As promised, here is a brief summary of the "Drone regions improvement suggestions" thread in the Russian General Discussion forum section. BackgroundPerceived disparity of income in drone regions compared to the GÇ£bountyGÇ¥ null-sec:
- Income in the drone regions is lower than in other null-sec (especially after the Drone Horde fixes and buffs of other anomalies)
- GÇ£GunminingGÇ¥ makes looting mandatory => need to operate extra accounts
- Lack of exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.)
Solutions
- Replace alloys with bounties comparable to other null-sec regions; at the same time, introduce other means for mineral compression [so that the existing player-built infrastructure is not wasted]
- Replace alloys with tags / other sellable items (similar to overseer effects) / BPCs for drone ships and equipment [introduction of CONCORD-purchasable drone drops can be role-played accordingly]
- Reduce the ratio of high-end minerals in the drone alloys [so that there is less dependency on drone regions for all minerals]
- Introduce faction / officer drone modules [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Introduce [mineral] convoys in drone regions [to counterbalance the lack of mineral supply if the alloys are changed to bounties]
- Introduce drone exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Increase the volume of alloys to be consistent with regular mining [so that mining does not become obsolete]
- Add non-drone anomalies to drone regions (similar to drone anomalies in the rest of null-sec) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Shuffle the drone regions around the map instead of clustering them all together [so that one group does not control the majority of the mineral supply]
- Replace alloys with T2 salvage or augmented drone components [so that the players can still contribute to the economy and get reasonable income]
- Make the GÇ£fast-trackGÇ¥ Drone Horde completion legal, essentially keeping the current status quo (while moving the escalation triggers to 10/10 complexes onto other anomalies) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Boost other high-end drone anomalies (Drone Patrols) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Add more drone/fighter/FB modifications to the game that would utilize drone components and create unique incentives in the drone regions [so that drone regions still produce something of considerable demand]
- Differentiate drone loot depending on the means used to destroy the rogue drone (killing w/ blasters or thermal missiles yield alloys, killing w/ projectiles or explosive/kinetic weapons yield modules, lasers or EM missiles yield drone components)
Potential IssuesIf the alloys will be replaced with bounties, will the following game elements be featured?
- Drone NPC regions
- Faction items
- Officers
WonGÇÖt the removal of alloys create a massive mineral deficit in the game; in the same vein, addition of drone bounties may lead to a massive inflation spike? In addition, PVE in drone regions is considered to be less prone to botting compared to other null-sec regionsGeneral Ideas and Feedback
- Introduce more randomness to anomalies (% chance for extra spawns, other faction encounters within a given anomaly, etc. )
- Botting is obviously perceived as a serious issue with null-sec in general
- More ISK sinks are needed GÇô e.g. introduce supercapital maintenance costs, etc.
- Make regions more diverse (unique loot, etc.) without creating a dependency of the whole game on any one region
Thnx for that...  now i need to study it... |

bornaa
GRiD.
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 15:03:00 -
[101] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Didn't see anyone posting this yet so here goes: CCP Spitfire wrote:-Ü-¦-¦ -+ -+-¦-¦-ë-¦-+, -¦-ï-¦-+-¦-¦-ï-¦-¦-Ä -¦-Ç-¦-é-¦-â-Ä -¦-ï-¦-+-+-¦-â -é-¦-+-ï -+-Ç-+ -¦-+-+-+-+-¦-+-ï-¦ -+-â-é-+ -â-+-â-ç-ê-¦-+-+-Å -¦-Ç-+-+--Ç-¦-¦-+-+-+-+-¦ -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+ -Å-+-ï-¦-¦; -¦-+-+-+-Å -¦-ï-+-¦ -+-é-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-¦-+-¦ -+-¦-+-+-ü-Ç-¦-¦-ü-é-¦-¦-+-+-+ CCP Greyscale. -ó-¦-¦ -¦-¦-¦ -+-é-¦-¦-é-ï -+-é -Ç-¦-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-é-ç-+-¦-+-¦ -¦ -ì-é-+-¦ -é-¦-+-¦ -é-¦-¦-¦-¦ -¦-â-¦-â-é -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+, -+-¦-ü-â-¦-¦-¦-+-+-¦, -¦-â-+-¦-Ä, -+-+-¦-¦-é -ü-+-ï-ü-+ -+-Ç-+-¦-+-+-¦-¦-é-î -¦ -+-Ç-¦-¦-ï-¦-â-ë-¦-¦ -é-¦-+-¦. --- As promised, here is a brief summary of the "Drone regions improvement suggestions" thread in the Russian General Discussion forum section. BackgroundPerceived disparity of income in drone regions compared to the GÇ£bountyGÇ¥ null-sec:
- Income in the drone regions is lower than in other null-sec (especially after the Drone Horde fixes and buffs of other anomalies)
- GÇ£GunminingGÇ¥ makes looting mandatory => need to operate extra accounts
- Lack of exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.)
Solutions
- Replace alloys with bounties comparable to other null-sec regions; at the same time, introduce other means for mineral compression [so that the existing player-built infrastructure is not wasted]
- Replace alloys with tags / other sellable items (similar to overseer effects) / BPCs for drone ships and equipment [introduction of CONCORD-purchasable drone drops can be role-played accordingly]
- Reduce the ratio of high-end minerals in the drone alloys [so that there is less dependency on drone regions for all minerals]
- Introduce faction / officer drone modules [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Introduce [mineral] convoys in drone regions [to counterbalance the lack of mineral supply if the alloys are changed to bounties]
- Introduce drone exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Increase the volume of alloys to be consistent with regular mining [so that mining does not become obsolete]
- Add non-drone anomalies to drone regions (similar to drone anomalies in the rest of null-sec) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Shuffle the drone regions around the map instead of clustering them all together [so that one group does not control the majority of the mineral supply]
- Replace alloys with T2 salvage or augmented drone components [so that the players can still contribute to the economy and get reasonable income]
- Make the GÇ£fast-trackGÇ¥ Drone Horde completion legal, essentially keeping the current status quo (while moving the escalation triggers to 10/10 complexes onto other anomalies) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Boost other high-end drone anomalies (Drone Patrols) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Add more drone/fighter/FB modifications to the game that would utilize drone components and create unique incentives in the drone regions [so that drone regions still produce something of considerable demand]
- Differentiate drone loot depending on the means used to destroy the rogue drone (killing w/ blasters or thermal missiles yield alloys, killing w/ projectiles or explosive/kinetic weapons yield modules, lasers or EM missiles yield drone components)
Potential IssuesIf the alloys will be replaced with bounties, will the following game elements be featured?
- Drone NPC regions
- Faction items
- Officers
WonGÇÖt the removal of alloys create a massive mineral deficit in the game; in the same vein, addition of drone bounties may lead to a massive inflation spike? In addition, PVE in drone regions is considered to be less prone to botting compared to other null-sec regionsGeneral Ideas and Feedback
- Introduce more randomness to anomalies (% chance for extra spawns, other faction encounters within a given anomaly, etc. )
- Botting is obviously perceived as a serious issue with null-sec in general
- More ISK sinks are needed GÇô e.g. introduce supercapital maintenance costs, etc.
- Make regions more diverse (unique loot, etc.) without creating a dependency of the whole game on any one region
when did CCP Spitfire wrote that??? |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
122
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 15:08:00 -
[102] - Quote
bornaa wrote:
when did CCP Spitfire wrote that???
CCP Spitfire: Drone regions improvement suggestions
|

March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 15:13:00 -
[103] - Quote
Freyya wrote:dischordia wrote: the drone parts come from the "commander" spawns and tbh you cant GIVE them away as they are worth fudge all due to the stuff they make sucking so bad and costing so damn much
Well it could then be a good incentive to make it less suck, distribute drone parts more to make it cost less and uhmmm....uhmmm. EPA?No... Damn, can't remember the 3rd thing, sorry.....oops. drone parts are for Augmented and Integrated versions of drones. Problem is: both integrated and augmented versions aren't much better that their T1 or T2 counterpart. The most problems are: combined damage type and price. - Price means no one will use it for PVP - combined damage type makes this drone less desirable for PVE (in most cases you want 1 damage type for 1 purpose)
Price for those drones are high because of BPC (which is really rare).
Personally i have lots of drone parts got from T2 drones. And i can't sell it (size is really bigger than profit i can make so it doesn't worth time and effort).
|

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 15:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
And you again don't see a problem? 1 capital combat-support ship and 1 salvager mine more then 1 capital mining-support ship and 2 T2 mining ships...
And we are talking about mining here
Crucis -
No, we are not talking about mining here. Miners are bitching they don't get paid enough, but what we are really talking about here is how to best supply the Eve mineral market with adequate supplies of minerals. Without a complete and radical change to the method and amounts that miners can achieve, you cannot simply toss out alloys.
The short-term thought process of "just get rid of alloys so miners can earn more isk" is exactly what causes long term negative effects for the entire game. It is changes like these that CCP has made far too often. Rebalancing one area to help another that ends up unbalancing other areas of the game in the process. The point is to think things out before making wholesale changes in the game that have been in place for more than 4 years.
I say it again - if you make mining the sole source of minerals in the game, then remove all ores from hisec. Too profitable for hisec. |

Malakai Draevyn
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 15:54:00 -
[105] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote: I say it again - if you make mining the sole source of minerals in the game, then remove all ores from hisec. Too profitable for hisec.
Surely to do this would require the wholesale removal of the ability to reprocess modules / ships / whatever into minerals as well ? I know that relatively speaking the amount of minerals that can be produced from chaining L4 missions isn't as great as that of the Drone Alloys or mining directly, but it does add up in the end.... |

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
117
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 16:01:00 -
[106] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:And you again don't see a problem? 1 capital combat-support ship and 1 salvager mine more then 1 capital mining-support ship and 2 T2 mining ships...  And we are talking about mining here
SIGNED WITH CAPITAL LETTERS!!!
maybe numbers are a little worse then that... but... you get a point... |

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 16:15:00 -
[107] - Quote
Malakai Draevyn wrote:Dirk MacGirk wrote: I say it again - if you make mining the sole source of minerals in the game, then remove all ores from hisec. Too profitable for hisec.
Surely to do this would require the wholesale removal of the ability to reprocess modules / ships / whatever into minerals as well ? I know that relatively speaking the amount of minerals that can be produced from chaining L4 missions isn't as great as that of the Drone Alloys or mining directly, but it does add up in the end....
CCP already nerfed the ability for mission runners to greatly impact the mineral market the way they used to by reducing the Meta 0 drops. They did it, in their words, in an effort to make drone alloys and mining the primary source of minerals. But in the upcoming expansion I believe they are increasing the yield from metal scraps to 500 units of trit. So in a way they are reversing themselves by a marginal amount. Perhaps they think the price of trit is TOO high today and are adding some supply back in. IDK why else they would do that.
But no, if you made mining the sole source of minerals, it would just be from the initial extraction standpoint. You could still reprocess items built in the game. Look, I don't actually advocate making mining the single source. That would be foolish. But if you did, I do advocate taking miniing out of hisec completely. It would be far too profitable to allow hisec carebears access to it. Mining in hisec is just fine today. Mining for high ends is what is really broken (Zyd < 800?). And that has nothing to do with alloys. |

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
117
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 16:24:00 -
[108] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote:Malakai Draevyn wrote:Dirk MacGirk wrote: I say it again - if you make mining the sole source of minerals in the game, then remove all ores from hisec. Too profitable for hisec.
Surely to do this would require the wholesale removal of the ability to reprocess modules / ships / whatever into minerals as well ? I know that relatively speaking the amount of minerals that can be produced from chaining L4 missions isn't as great as that of the Drone Alloys or mining directly, but it does add up in the end.... CCP already nerfed the ability for mission runners to greatly impact the mineral market the way they used to by reducing the Meta 0 drops. They did it, in their words, in an effort to make drone alloys and mining the primary source of minerals. But in the upcoming expansion I believe they are increasing the yield from metal scraps to 500 units of trit. So in a way they are reversing themselves by a marginal amount. Perhaps they think the price of trit is TOO high today and are adding some supply back in. IDK why else they would do that. But no, if you made mining the sole source of minerals, it would just be from the initial extraction standpoint. You could still reprocess items built in the game. Look, I don't actually advocate making mining the single source. That would be foolish. But if you did, I do advocate taking miniing out of hisec completely. It would be far too profitable to allow hisec carebears access to it. Mining in hisec is just fine today. Mining for high ends is what is really broken (Zyd < 800?). And that has nothing to do with alloys.
CCP removed "few large guns" from drop lists and that's all what they removed from meta 0 drops... they removed like 10-20% of meta 0 drops... that's all... that have no impact at all... |

BigCountry
Knights Of Anarchy Shadow of xXDEATHXx
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 19:36:00 -
[109] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote: Maybe we should let alloys stay but CCP can tax the ratters and give it to the miners. The we can create a welfare system in Eve. Or how about this: Get rid of all alloys and let mining be the only place you get get minerals. But in return, CCP removes all ore from hisec. Mining will only exist in lowsec and null sec space. If it is that profitable then it shouldn't be in hisec anyway. Deal?
HAHAHAHAHA This +100 ...........welfare for miners... and when they cant afford new mining crystals then they gotta go crystal stamps...... |

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 23:07:00 -
[110] - Quote
From CCP Spitfire's Post
Solutions
Shuffle the drone regions around the map instead of clustering them all together [so that one group does not control the majority of the mineral supply]
It has become quite clear through CCP's recent actions and this specific "thought" from CCP Spitfire, that CCPs unstated intention is to intervene in the game against the so-called Russians. While everyone else sat around with their thumbs up their asses, the Russians (XIX, Solar and RA) solidified their control over the drone regions. Nobody else wanted these areas. Too hard to make isk, they said. The drone regions suck, they said. PvPers coldn't be bothered with anything but isk faucets like bounty space. The "real" PvP alliances didnt want it so nobody really tried to fight for it. So the Russians collected their alloys, built capital ships and formed the most well-run renter system in the game. Then came the introduction of the Super Carrier. Then people discovered that the drone regions were worth something. I hear it isnt so much fun when huge fleet of the most destructive ships in the game drop down on a system near you.
In response, CCP is now nerfing titans and neutering super carriers while also buffing anti-SC ships and ensuring that blob warfare is the dominant tactic in the game once again. On top of that, a CCP dev thinks that perhaps the solution is to "shuffle the drone regions around the map... so that one group does not control the majority of the mineral supply." History shows that control of the materials of production gives a strategic advantage. The so-called Russians apparently knew this while the rest of Eve seemingly didn't care. CCP supposedly want there to be reason to fight in Eve. Well, if control of the majority of the mineral market in Eve isn't reason enough to fight, then there will never be a good reason. The solution is not to intervene on behalf of the ignorant popluation of the game against a group that figured out how to win. Because if they do, then CCP should just come out and declare:
The Russians have won Eve and you just let them do it. As a result, we are hereby resetting the game back to the borders of hisec. Welcome to Eve 2.0. |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 23:44:00 -
[111] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Didn't see anyone posting this yet so here goes: CCP Spitfire wrote:-Ü-¦-¦ -+ -+-¦-¦-ë-¦-+, -¦-ï-¦-+-¦-¦-ï-¦-¦-Ä -¦-Ç-¦-é-¦-â-Ä -¦-ï-¦-+-+-¦-â -é-¦-+-ï -+-Ç-+ -¦-+-+-+-+-¦-+-ï-¦ -+-â-é-+ -â-+-â-ç-ê-¦-+-+-Å -¦-Ç-+-+--Ç-¦-¦-+-+-+-+-¦ -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+ -Å-+-ï-¦-¦; -¦-+-+-+-Å -¦-ï-+-¦ -+-é-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-¦-+-¦ -+-¦-+-+-ü-Ç-¦-¦-ü-é-¦-¦-+-+-+ CCP Greyscale. -ó-¦-¦ -¦-¦-¦ -+-é-¦-¦-é-ï -+-é -Ç-¦-+-Ç-¦-¦-+-é-ç-+-¦-+-¦ -¦ -ì-é-+-¦ -é-¦-+-¦ -é-¦-¦-¦-¦ -¦-â-¦-â-é -+-¦ -¦-+-¦-+-+-¦-ü-¦-+-+, -+-¦-ü-â-¦-¦-¦-+-+-¦, -¦-â-+-¦-Ä, -+-+-¦-¦-é -ü-+-ï-ü-+ -+-Ç-+-¦-+-+-¦-¦-é-î -¦ -+-Ç-¦-¦-ï-¦-â-ë-¦-¦ -é-¦-+-¦. --- As promised, here is a brief summary of the "Drone regions improvement suggestions" thread in the Russian General Discussion forum section. BackgroundPerceived disparity of income in drone regions compared to the GÇ£bountyGÇ¥ null-sec:
- Income in the drone regions is lower than in other null-sec (especially after the Drone Horde fixes and buffs of other anomalies)
- GÇ£GunminingGÇ¥ makes looting mandatory => need to operate extra accounts
- Lack of exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.)
Solutions
- Replace alloys with bounties comparable to other null-sec regions; at the same time, introduce other means for mineral compression [so that the existing player-built infrastructure is not wasted]
- Replace alloys with tags / other sellable items (similar to overseer effects) / BPCs for drone ships and equipment [introduction of CONCORD-purchasable drone drops can be role-played accordingly]
- Reduce the ratio of high-end minerals in the drone alloys [so that there is less dependency on drone regions for all minerals]
- Introduce faction / officer drone modules [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Introduce [mineral] convoys in drone regions [to counterbalance the lack of mineral supply if the alloys are changed to bounties]
- Introduce drone exploration sites (ladar/magnetometric/etc.) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Increase the volume of alloys to be consistent with regular mining [so that mining does not become obsolete]
- Add non-drone anomalies to drone regions (similar to drone anomalies in the rest of null-sec) [so that there is more diversity and/or income streams]
- Shuffle the drone regions around the map instead of clustering them all together [so that one group does not control the majority of the mineral supply]
- Replace alloys with T2 salvage or augmented drone components [so that the players can still contribute to the economy and get reasonable income]
- Make the GÇ£fast-trackGÇ¥ Drone Horde completion legal, essentially keeping the current status quo (while moving the escalation triggers to 10/10 complexes onto other anomalies) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Boost other high-end drone anomalies (Drone Patrols) [so that the players are not penalized with reduced income]
- Add more drone/fighter/FB modifications to the game that would utilize drone components and create unique incentives in the drone regions [so that drone regions still produce something of considerable demand]
- Differentiate drone loot depending on the means used to destroy the rogue drone (killing w/ blasters or thermal missiles yield alloys, killing w/ projectiles or explosive/kinetic weapons yield modules, lasers or EM missiles yield drone components)
Potential IssuesIf the alloys will be replaced with bounties, will the following game elements be featured?
- Drone NPC regions
- Faction items
- Officers
WonGÇÖt the removal of alloys create a massive mineral deficit in the game; in the same vein, addition of drone bounties may lead to a massive inflation spike? In addition, PVE in drone regions is considered to be less prone to botting compared to other null-sec regionsGeneral Ideas and Feedback
- Introduce more randomness to anomalies (% chance for extra spawns, other faction encounters within a given anomaly, etc. )
- Botting is obviously perceived as a serious issue with null-sec in general
- More ISK sinks are needed GÇô e.g. introduce supercapital maintenance costs, etc.
- Make regions more diverse (unique loot, etc.) without creating a dependency of the whole game on any one region
Please CCP... remove mineral drops from drones... Give them anything else... just return minerals to miners... like it suppose to be in normal world... its not normal to shoot planes to get materials to make planes... |

Rykuss
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 00:22:00 -
[112] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote:And you again don't see a problem? 1 capital combat-support ship and 1 salvager mine more then 1 capital mining-support ship and 2 T2 mining ships...
And we are talking about mining here
Crucis -
No, we are not talking about mining here. Miners are bitching they don't get paid enough, but what we are really talking about here is how to best supply the Eve mineral market with adequate supplies of minerals. Without a complete and radical change to the method and amounts that miners can achieve, you cannot simply toss out alloys.
The short-term thought process of "just get rid of alloys so miners can earn more isk" is exactly what causes long term negative effects for the entire game. It is changes like these that CCP has made far too often. Rebalancing one area to help another that ends up unbalancing other areas of the game in the process. The point is to think things out before making wholesale changes in the game that have been in place for more than 4 years.
I say it again - if you make mining the sole source of minerals in the game, then remove all ores from hisec. Too profitable for hisec.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! I was going to retort this post and point out how stupid your wall of excuses really is but this would be hilarious! Then maybe you people would upgrade your systems and mine your own minerals. I say you people because noone else would come out there to mine them for you. Wouldn't that pretty much force people to "babysit" miners? LOL You're right, CCP should stop fixing those other mechanics in the game because they've been there for years.  Can I have your vindicator? |

Severian Carnifex
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 05:59:00 -
[113] - Quote
Rykuss wrote:Dirk MacGirk wrote:And you again don't see a problem? 1 capital combat-support ship and 1 salvager mine more then 1 capital mining-support ship and 2 T2 mining ships...
And we are talking about mining here
Crucis -
No, we are not talking about mining here. Miners are bitching they don't get paid enough, but what we are really talking about here is how to best supply the Eve mineral market with adequate supplies of minerals. Without a complete and radical change to the method and amounts that miners can achieve, you cannot simply toss out alloys.
The short-term thought process of "just get rid of alloys so miners can earn more isk" is exactly what causes long term negative effects for the entire game. It is changes like these that CCP has made far too often. Rebalancing one area to help another that ends up unbalancing other areas of the game in the process. The point is to think things out before making wholesale changes in the game that have been in place for more than 4 years.
I say it again - if you make mining the sole source of minerals in the game, then remove all ores from hisec. Too profitable for hisec. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! I was going to retort this post and point out how stupid your wall of excuses really is but this would be hilarious! Then maybe you people would upgrade your systems and mine your own minerals. I say you people because noone else would come out there to mine them for you. Wouldn't that pretty much force people to "babysit" miners? LOL You're right, CCP should stop fixing those other mechanics in the game because they've been there for years. 
soooo +1 |

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
117
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 11:10:00 -
[114] - Quote
BigCountry wrote:Dirk MacGirk wrote: Maybe we should let alloys stay but CCP can tax the ratters and give it to the miners. The we can create a welfare system in Eve. Or how about this: Get rid of all alloys and let mining be the only place you get get minerals. But in return, CCP removes all ore from hisec. Mining will only exist in lowsec and null sec space. If it is that profitable then it shouldn't be in hisec anyway. Deal?
HAHAHAHAHA This +100 ...........welfare for miners... and when they cant afford new mining crystals then they gotta go crystal stamps......
The sad part is that the direction mining is going we will need to give miners crystal and food stamps... mining is so broken and miners profit is so miserable low...
|

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 12:29:00 -
[115] - Quote
You must be referring to mining in hisec. But even there, the price of the low end minerals is up from a year ago. For example, trit is up 50% from this time a year ago to around its highest level in a long time.
You just can't cry about the profits from mining in hisec. No risk, no reward. And don't tell me about Hulkageddon and the Goons and can flippers being a risk. If you're in hisec and want to mine and make money, then get some friends, make a corp and come to 0.0 and put up an ihub so you can mine Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite. But quit blaming alloys for your woes. Hisec was never meant to be very profitable for miners. Its why they put the crap ores there.
If you are already in 0.0 and not making enough isk from mining, you still can't blame alloys because they have almost nothing to do with high end minerals. Those are too low because there are too many miners in 0.0 mining Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite relative to the demand for Megacyte and Zydrine in the market.
Blaming alloys alone for the woes of hisec miners is like blaming all of 0.0 because hisec planetary interaction isn't as profitable as it is in 0.0. It was never meant to be. When CCP talks about how to fix the drone regions, they don't mean so hisec miners can get paid more. They mean how do they improve the drone regions and how do they keep the Russians from owning it all. Their intentions are clear and it has nothing to do with your profits while sitting 2 jumps from a trade hub crying over your empty belt of veldspar/pyrox/scordite/omber, etc.
Anyway, good luck. I have to go take care of some Prime Arkonor that isn't going to mine itself. And then I have to go mine some drones. |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 18:36:00 -
[116] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote:You must be referring to mining in hisec. But even there, the price of the low end minerals is up from a year ago. For example, trit is up 50% from this time a year ago to around its highest level in a long time.
You just can't cry about the profits from mining in hisec. No risk, no reward. And don't tell me about Hulkageddon and the Goons and can flippers being a risk. If you're in hisec and want to mine and make money, then get some friends, make a corp and come to 0.0 and put up an ihub so you can mine Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite. But quit blaming alloys for your woes. Hisec was never meant to be very profitable for miners. Its why they put the crap ores there.
If you are already in 0.0 and not making enough isk from mining, you still can't blame alloys because they have almost nothing to do with high end minerals. Those are too low because there are too many miners in 0.0 mining Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite relative to the demand for Megacyte and Zydrine in the market.
Blaming alloys alone for the woes of hisec miners is like blaming all of 0.0 because hisec planetary interaction isn't as profitable as it is in 0.0. It was never meant to be. When CCP talks about how to fix the drone regions, they don't mean so hisec miners can get paid more. They mean how do they improve the drone regions and how do they keep the Russians from owning it all. Their intentions are clear and it has nothing to do with your profits while sitting 2 jumps from a trade hub crying over your empty belt of veldspar/pyrox/scordite/omber, etc.
Anyway, good luck. I have to go take care of some Prime Arkonor that isn't going to mine itself. And then I have to go mine some drones.
And who are you to take ISK from other group of players???
Mining was here from begining of EVE and ppl trained skills for looong time to mine and manufacture... and they you got minerals under your guns and without any specialized training got more minerals then mining... If you want it... then i want that CCP introduce additional training of same length per mining amount per hour per character as miners have for ppl that want to gun mine to get that minerals!!! Then we can talk who can earn how much from minerals... only then!!!
If we with mining skills can only mine... then you with killing skills can only kill...
or give mining lasers dmg that would be better then the best combat ship... if your combat ship can mine better then the best mining ship... that we should kill better then the best combat ship... |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
731
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:05:00 -
[117] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:Dirk MacGirk wrote:You must be referring to mining in hisec. But even there, the price of the low end minerals is up from a year ago. For example, trit is up 50% from this time a year ago to around its highest level in a long time.
You just can't cry about the profits from mining in hisec. No risk, no reward. And don't tell me about Hulkageddon and the Goons and can flippers being a risk. If you're in hisec and want to mine and make money, then get some friends, make a corp and come to 0.0 and put up an ihub so you can mine Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite. But quit blaming alloys for your woes. Hisec was never meant to be very profitable for miners. Its why they put the crap ores there.
If you are already in 0.0 and not making enough isk from mining, you still can't blame alloys because they have almost nothing to do with high end minerals. Those are too low because there are too many miners in 0.0 mining Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite relative to the demand for Megacyte and Zydrine in the market.
Blaming alloys alone for the woes of hisec miners is like blaming all of 0.0 because hisec planetary interaction isn't as profitable as it is in 0.0. It was never meant to be. When CCP talks about how to fix the drone regions, they don't mean so hisec miners can get paid more. They mean how do they improve the drone regions and how do they keep the Russians from owning it all. Their intentions are clear and it has nothing to do with your profits while sitting 2 jumps from a trade hub crying over your empty belt of veldspar/pyrox/scordite/omber, etc.
Anyway, good luck. I have to go take care of some Prime Arkonor that isn't going to mine itself. And then I have to go mine some drones. And who are you to take ISK from other group of players??? Mining was here from begining of EVE and ppl trained skills for looong time to mine and manufacture... and they you got minerals under your guns and without any specialized training got more minerals then mining... If you want it... then i want that CCP introduce additional training of same length per mining amount per hour per character as miners have for ppl that want to gun mine to get that minerals!!! Then we can talk who can earn how much from minerals... only then!!! If we with mining skills can only mine... then you with killing skills can only kill... or give mining lasers dmg that would be better then the best combat ship... if your combat ship can mine better then the best mining ship... that we should kill better then the best combat ship...
You hit the center of the problem by this! Ppl that wasted their subscription time on training of something must benefit of it, and only of it, and not of all things in eve, and not something else, only of that what you trained for. You train it, you get it... you don't train it, you don't get it... simple. |

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 23:52:00 -
[118] - Quote
Industry: 6+ million SP 31/32 skills all level 4 or higher. This does not include the skills for hulks, orcas, rorquals, leadership skills, etc. etc. Now multiply that across multiple characters. So don't waste your time talking about skills you've trained that aren't paying off the way you WISH they would. Because then I'll just throw out there how Fighter Bombers 5 is working out for me.
We all train skills that are sometimes worth using and sometimes not. Let me give you a piece of advice: learn to do more than one thing in the game. Markets change and the way you earn today may not be the most profitable way tomorrow. |

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
117
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 14:35:00 -
[119] - Quote
How i love ppl that are butthurt when you tell them the truth... Then they change the subject... |

Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate Shadow of xXDEATHXx
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 22:05:00 -
[120] - Quote
Dude, I have repeatedly put down your weak attempts at trying to justify getting rid of alloys. Learn to live with it because alloys are not going away. If you want to know why, search my posts for the lesson on supply and demand. That doesn't mean CCP might not find a way of changing the drone regions, but I can reasonably guarantee the end result will not be to make hisec mining better for you.
And I didn't change the subject, you simpleton. I merely listed my mining/industry skills in order to let you know I'm not some n00b and that I understand how long it takes to train skills. But how long it takes you to train anything in this game has no bearing on what you think you deserve. Thinking you deserve anything other than being allowed to log in after paying your sub is just foolish. So take your weak ass whining about what you wish and hope someplace else because unless you can bring even the smallest defensible argument to the table, you just continue to devalue your input.
Then again, maybe you and some of the others can get together and set up tents in LXQ2-T and start the "Occupy Drone Regions" movement. You'll get just as far with that as posting your carebear tears in this forum. God it's sad when one carebear has to tell another he's embarrassing the rest of us.
|

Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 22:20:00 -
[121] - Quote
First, how do you know i am dude? You put down something??? well... maybe you put down something every day but you did not here... You are just writing responses that you think are valid and are not. And your indy skills are nothing, when you have over 20mill in industry related things then you can talk how that's long. And you think that you deserve all because??? because you are in some alliance??? or because your 6mill SP worth more then 20mill from other guy??? If anyone don't deserve minerals that are guys that got it last... that's you my child... You broke the game for the rest of ppl, you will fix it.
And where are that your arguments? And if you see around, only you are "fighting" for something that other ppl saw they cant win. And look around, many ppl is writing against you solo, but you are all, you are God in your little mind so that's no problem for you.
I told what i have on my mind and i have no intent on wasting my time on some children that likes to play "the mighty God" role. When you have some arguments that are not "i have right and other ppl don't because I am I" you can PM me. And until then - grow up. |

bornaa
GRiD.
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.27 13:06:00 -
[122] - Quote
CCP... anything new on this subject??? |

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
490
|
Posted - 2011.11.27 13:22:00 -
[123] - Quote
Avila Cracko wrote:First, how do you know i am dude?
There is just one rule to posting on the Internet. We're Men.
The Men are Men. The Women are Men. The Children are Men.
The only people who are not Men are the FBI. They are Children.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |