| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Angus McLean
Gallente
Divinity Trials
   |
Posted - 2006.11.22 15:33:00 -
[61]
 Originally by: Aramendel
Tier 2 != Tech 2.
Did the command ships (aka tech 2 BCs) nerf HAC? Nope. Then you can bet that the tier2 BCs won't as well.
That's terrible logic. You have to fly Command ships to understand this delimma.
Command ships are expensive and take months to train for.
Tier 2 battlecruisers are simple to train for and hardly cost a thing. Plus they could possibly put DPS a HAC. I wouldn't be surprised igmy Zealot drops uder 150mil after Kali.
|
Flax Volcanus
Tea And Sympathy Ltd. Liability
Vertigo Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.11.22 16:22:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Maeli Nakamura
Originally by: Aramendel
Interesting. The ship boni are not in there, though (or, better, they still use the "old" ones of the tier 1 BC, BS, etc).
The plural of 'bonus' is 'bonuses'. Where do you people come up with 'boni'?
I was thinking the same thing -- but if you want to appear erudite by criticizing others' mistakes publicly, you should use double quotes, rather than single, and be sure that your commas and periods appear inside the quotation marks, rather than outside.
Want to borrow my style guide? |
Aion Amarra
Minmatar
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2006.11.22 17:08:00 -
[63]
I know that the plural of "Bonus" is "Boni" in German. Might be the same for some other languages as well, so it probably comes from that.
________
Capitalization is the difference between "I helped my uncle Jack off his horse." and "I helped my uncle jack off his horse."
Help the horses, make proper use of that shift button. |
Shardrael
Caldari
AWE Corporation
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.11.23 05:47:00 -
[64]
Edited by: Shardrael on 23/11/2006 05:53:30
I am curious but why do tech 1 battlecruisers have to be worse in every respect then a HAC?
if you have a different oppinion so be it, but the way I see it battlecruisers are a destroyer equivalent for the cruiser class, large enough to lay a little beat down on there smaller cousins but not large enough to step up and fight the big boys(BS)
were tech 2 frigs nerfed into uselessness by the destroyer? no
they simply provided another viable alternative to dealing with assault frigs and interceptors.
Battlecruisers provide an alternative to dealing with cruisers and heavy assault cruisers and to some extent recons,
granted I have heard horror stories of drakes pwning battleships with fury assault missles etc but I am more inclined to believe the problem lies with the missles and not the ship.
regardless why shouldn't a ship that basically fits 30% more weapons+ then there little cousins outdmg them in some situations?
and no price is not a good enough reason, HAC prices are made by the players not the devs and devs are not responsible for making a ship crappy because so many people wanna pay insane prices for another ship, in most instances the new battlecruisers will still get BBQ'd by battleships and thus the proverbial food chain of eve is maintained.
shouldnt the destroyer class of cruisers be able to kill cruisers even if they are a bit special?
edit: omfg i contributed to thread necromancy..... look and learn kids, never continue the slow and already painful death of an old thread
Originally by: Pinky Denmark
Caldari have other options like using rails or train for other ships/weapons...
|
|
Serathu
Forum Moderator
Interstellar Services Department
|
Posted - 2006.11.23 15:59:00 -
[65]
Locked due to thread necromancy and since there are other, more up to date threads on this topic.
*click*
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |