| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Remiel Pollard
The 0th Fleet A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3422
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:41:00 -
[91] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something. go and do your own reaserch
Spell research properly before attempting to come across as intellectually superior. If you'd read what I wrote, like, actually read it, I said, in no uncertain terms, what you said - the outrage was about an unfinished feature at the expense of fixes to existing broken features. Don't tell me to do my own "reaserch" [sic] if you can't even read.
As an addendum, doing your own research is pointless without proper analysis. Your vexatious delivery of this 'instruction' parallels similar deliveries by various deniers across the face of the planet - vaccine deniers, heliocentricity deniers, old earth deniers, and science deniers in general - complete with flying spittle and all. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
[email protected] |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6979
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:42:00 -
[92] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ahost Gceo wrote: Other game aspects that could use some love are missions and wormhole Sleeper content. Missions have been gamed out for years and are rather shallow when it comes to immersion in the storyline.
If they wasted a few months dev time to "improve" missions, this game's community would have them gamed out again in about two weeks. And that's the problem with talking about "improving" PvE content. You don't really mean improving, you mean rotate it a little bit because you're bored. And after you get bored with this new one, you will demand it be redone over again. Ad nauseum. Well, the truth is that shooting red crosses is never going to be anything but shooting red crosses. They could spend a few months to design a procedural system for missions, like a random dungeon generator. So you will only get a general gist and maybe a threat level estimation from the mission description while the exact configuration is unknown and prone to offer a surprise or two. And while they're at it, they could condense mission rats to be more in line with the ships players are using, albeit at a lowish skill level. And adapt them to the changes of pirate factions. And have them spawn drones when in aggression range. Make it less predictable and imitate player behaviour more.
If they made PvE gameplay something people actually have to think about, the howling from the PvE players would throw the earth off it's axis. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18729
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:59:00 -
[93] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:If they made PvE gameplay something people actually have to think about, the howling from the PvE players would throw the earth off it's axis. Their tears would raise sea levels more than climate change is supposed to.
Eve is an introduction to teamwork, paranoia, dealing with consequences, coping with loss, economics, long term planning, bartering, astronomy, and the theory of space submarine travel.
Nil mortifi sine lucre |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5251
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:15:00 -
[94] - Quote
Ahost Gceo wrote: There was quality to the posting here to begin with? It's either been people sympathizing with the OP or people simplying exercising a Neanderthal mindset and insisting that EVE is fine the way it is while making fun of his less than concise thought processes, "everyone +1 my comment because I'm like so super edgy and hardcore and you're so super stupid lol."
Don't hold back, man, tell us how you feel "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |
|

CCP Falcon
7475

|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:31:00 -
[95] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:the future of eve
Take a look here.

CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Manager -á || -á EVE Illuminati
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Spectral Tiger
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:36:00 -
[96] - Quote
Well EVE is a niche game and the future of EVE is to remain a niche game. The question being is how many leave compared with how many start and stay.
There was another thread about player retention suggesting the majority of new players leave within the first 2 months. How true that is I can't say as I've not seen any figures for it. But I can understand why that maybe the case, essentially they get bored due to being limited to what they can actually do in-game with the limited trained skills they have. Of course there are people that like the long skill tree and the fact it takes months/years to actually be able to do something that you want to do. Although I think that would be a minority of MMO players.
EVE is a sandbox and being a sandbox you have to set your own goals, if you don't then you have no real direction leading to boredom, ship spinning, logging in to change skills and ultimately leaving the game. Throwing new content into the mix will not change that, well at least not for long.
Not everyone wants to play alts and how often do we hear people saying they need alts to raise the capital in order for them to be able to PvP. Now there's a good reason for some players to not want to PvP because quite frankly they perceive it as something that they can't afford to do. If you want more people to PvP then it needs to be affordable without the need for alts.
New content or bug fixing/balancing? I'd say both are equally important, although with new content it needs to be well thought out and not just something to try and keep people. Content like new ships are good especially as some of the old ones were not great designs, but a lot of those will be unplayable to new people for sometime to come. Personally I actually like some of the newer designs. As for bugs and rebalances (if game breaking) that's something that should be done as the corrective action is developed and not leave it to add as part of an expansion.
I could go on but I'll just finish pretty much as I started.
EVE is a niche game and unless the game design is going to change drastically and upset the niche market it has then it'll always be a niche game. So the future is probably a slightly lower population as more MMOs are released, but I don't think there's any easy answer and probably why CCP doesn't want to rock the boat too much.
Edit: Hmm, a dev post has been added, I better take a look. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6707
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:59:00 -
[97] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:
Anyone mining has to choices either hope the nice low or null sec guys wont charge you to much or shoot you or keep hoping 6 dudes in catalysts dont show up to show you why carebearing is bad. Miners need some serious buffing
I haven't read most of this thread or the OP for that matter , mainly because the above quoted nonsense stopped me cold lol.
Back when CCP buffed mining ships i told them what I thought would happen and that it would mirror getting a pay raise in real life.
Years ago, my job paid the worst wages of any other organization of it's kind in you county. My co-workers (and to be honest , I was right there with them) agitated for a long overdue pay increase. It finally happened and everyone was happy.
One co-worker who'd been with us less than a year told me that he thought the raise would lead to less bitching and moaning and more professionalism. it was so naive it was sweet lol.
So i told him what will really happen: We'll get a raise, but the people who are always unhappy will return to being unhappy in a month or two. Mainly because they are unhappy people to begin with, but also because it's not INCOME lvl that causes financial unhappiness, it's spending habits. In 2 months the unhappy people who are happy at the raise will find that their bad spending habits have caught up to them, will feel like nothing has changed for them, and go right back to bitching.
Meanwhile the people who could already manage their money (you know, the guys who don't even realize it's payday) won't even notice a change other than their monthly bank statement showing more money going into savings.
As IRL, so it is in game. The miners were happy for a quick second because they let themselves believe that CCP cared about them and wanted to protect them from the gankers lol. They thought the exhumer buffs would stop ganking. What really happened is that the miners who were flying and fitting smart to begin with (and never got ganked to begin with) continued to not get ganked (and thus didn't complain) while the greedy and lazy 'max yeild crowd' kept flying stupid (or afk), and still got ganked like before only by a few more catalysts.
It didn't take long for the bad miners to go right back to asking for more buffs/more nerfs to gankers just like they always had. people are people, in game or out. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1572
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:05:00 -
[98] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something. go and do your own reaserch Spell research properly before attempting to come across as intellectually superior. If you'd read what I wrote, like, actually read it, I said, in no uncertain terms, what you said - the outrage was about the addition of a new but unfinished feature at the expense of fixes to existing broken or unfinished features. Don't tell me to do my own "reaserch" [sic] if you can't even read. As an addendum, doing your own research is pointless without proper analysis. Your vexatious delivery of this 'instruction' parallels similar deliveries by various deniers across the face of the planet - vaccine deniers, heliocentricity deniers, old earth deniers, and science deniers in general - complete with flying spittle and all. In my experience, telling people to "do their own research" amounts to " don't make me do stuff" - you either don't have, or are too lazy to find, the 'research' that you're telling me to do. Every time someone says it to me, I know I'm talking to someone who wouldn't qualify as a halfwit with twice the brainpower they have, let alone someone who even knows what research actually is.
I see a lot of words here but fail to see your point. You disregarded the entire sentiment of quinns post and instead criticized his spelling... Do you really think that helps your argument?
Nobody is saying that fixes do don't improve the game but some people feel fixes without any real content makes for a boring game. I you feet otherwise, please explain your views more clearly instead of talking nonsense and insulting people. +1 |

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
834
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:07:00 -
[99] - Quote
incursions need removing really... besides the ridicilous storyline .. they have been getting slaughtered for years now.... but the easy money part . .. the exploitation by alts from nullsec .... it detracts from having too work for your isk.. Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5252
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:09:00 -
[100] - Quote
Given how I have personally introduced five new players (and more than that in accounts) in the last 9 months and none have left, I don't know what the OP is doing wrong if he's seeing people leave
Oh wait I do
Its the defeatest attitude of people who are never satisfied
Mining ships are the buffed they've ever been and indy is getting a massive buff soon
Tech 1 ships as a whole (you know, apparently for "new players") got a huge boost recently to keep them competitive against highly specialised T2 variants
What more do you want?
"If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Remiel Pollard
The 0th Fleet A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3423
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:10:00 -
[101] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something. go and do your own reaserch Spell research properly before attempting to come across as intellectually superior. If you'd read what I wrote, like, actually read it, I said, in no uncertain terms, what you said - the outrage was about the addition of a new but unfinished feature at the expense of fixes to existing broken or unfinished features. Don't tell me to do my own "reaserch" [sic] if you can't even read. As an addendum, doing your own research is pointless without proper analysis. Your vexatious delivery of this 'instruction' parallels similar deliveries by various deniers across the face of the planet - vaccine deniers, heliocentricity deniers, old earth deniers, and science deniers in general - complete with flying spittle and all. In my experience, telling people to "do their own research" amounts to " don't make me do stuff" - you either don't have, or are too lazy to find, the 'research' that you're telling me to do. Every time someone says it to me, I know I'm talking to someone who wouldn't qualify as a halfwit with twice the brainpower they have, let alone someone who even knows what research actually is. I see a lot of words here but fail to see your point. You disregarded the entire sentiment of quinns post and instead criticized his spelling... Do you really think that helps your argument? Nobody is saying that fixes do don't improve the game but some people feel fixes without any real content makes for a boring game. I you feet otherwise, please explain your views more clearly instead of talking nonsense and insulting people.
Are you on crack? I didn't disregard any 'sentiment', I told him to try reading before telling me to 'do my research'. He just tried to lecture me on stuff I'd ALREADY SAID in the very post he was responding to. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
[email protected] |

Prince Kobol
1945
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:14:00 -
[102] - Quote
Yeah..
Future of Eve
Oops My Bad
  |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6983
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:15:00 -
[103] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:17:00 -
[104] - Quote
And don't forget this cool stuff: COOL STUFF
Where is all that content huh CCP? 
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one.
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting. +1 |

Spectral Tiger
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:21:00 -
[105] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one.
So what's this theme park content you are talking about? Can you give us some examples? |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5252
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:22:00 -
[106] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
So..
Let me get this right
After a barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant
You cherry pick one thing that wouldn't have actually added anything to the game for at least months if not years?
If at all?
Stop trying to derail this into another boring WiS argument "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6983
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:22:00 -
[107] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Where is all that content huh CCP? 
That particular content has been left to die in obscurity where it belongs.
Good riddance.
Quote: So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
And you want more of that? More failed delivery, borked concepts that have to be fixed over years, or quietly swept into a corner and ignored?
You actually want more of that kind of thing? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Matilda Cecilia Fock
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
99
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:32:00 -
[108] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:And don't forget this cool stuff: COOL STUFFWhere is all that content huh CCP?  (...)
Apparently it is so dead that you can't open threads about it, else they are deedem "redundant" and closed.  Q: So many well known dev's left lately, should we be worried? A: (Jester): Nope. (...) Worry a lot if Fozzie, Masterplan, Rise, Veritas, Bettik, Ytterbium, Scarpia, Arrow, or even Greyscale leaves. Worry a little if Punkturis, karkur, SoniClover, Affinity, Goliath, or Xhagen leaves.
|

Higgs Foton
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
144
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:36:00 -
[109] - Quote
I have been to two fanfests myself, and there was stuff introduced (Ring mining! Walking in stations! Expandable POS! Player built gates!) which i have yet to see come to fruition. My conclusion is that CCP is just calling the results of their brainstorm sessions at fanfest to have some content, without really planning to do something of substance with it.. So i do not really believe what has been said in those movies. I find the implementation of "new stuff" a tad on the slowish side. We need more psssshhhhh. *Snip* Removed trolling part of the post. ISD Ezwal.*Snip* *Snip*-áPlease refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.*Snip* *Snip*-áRemoved part of the post for not having enough pssssshhhhhh. ISD Ezwal.-á*Snip* |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6712
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:38:00 -
[110] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one.
Samuel L. Jackson voice
Think of the mother ******* children, mother ******
/Samuel L. Jackson voice

|

Colonel Jim Irwin
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:39:00 -
[111] - Quote
I bougth a playstation 4 :D |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6712
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:41:00 -
[112] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
If you believe what you see at fanfest, well that means you're the right guy to take a look at some seafront property I'm selling for cheap in Colorado.
|

Tricia Killnu
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:44:00 -
[113] - Quote
Just undock and blow up ships
Its pretty satisfying. . . Sometimes you just have to realized you undocked and you suck. . . |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:49:00 -
[114] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Rek Seven wrote:
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
So.. Let me get this right After a barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant You cherry pick one thing that wouldn't have actually added anything to the game for at least months if not years? If at all? Stop trying to derail this into another boring WiS argument How about answering any of the points raised about how subs are not haemorraghing and indy and mining is stronger and more popular than its ever been and is getting even more buffs?
The only people ranting are the people on your side of the fence mate. I already stated why I feel the way do and I attempted to justify my claims. Perhaps you missed it so i'll post it again for you:
Rek Seven wrote:For those of you that believe fixes alone are the answer to all the problems, please take a look at the following information. Server numbers are steadily declining and they are almost as low as they were during the summer of rage. The highest they have ever been was between the incursion and incarna releases, so make of that what you will... http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility. 
Now as for the " barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant" i have honestly missed anything that disproves anything i say.
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
Once again, I like the fact that CCP are fixing parts of the game but that doesn't stop me from wanting new content to give me something new to do. +1 |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5252
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:52:00 -
[115] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
Now as for the " barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant" i have honestly missed anything that disproves anything i say.
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
They do both
And you are choosing to ignore anything that doesn't fit your point of view
You are unhappy
Maybe you should go, have a sit down, and think why a video game makes you so unhappy "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6715
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:56:00 -
[116] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
Once again, I like the fact that CCP are fixing parts of the game but that doesn't stop me from wanting new content to give me something new to do.
If you need ccp to add new content to give you new things to do, you're playing the wrong game. 7 years I've played and I'm still finding new things to do, even more so now that CCP is making old useless things new .
I now know for a fact that an Impel can tank the citadel torp from a 10/10 while deploying a jet can of cap boosters (toi keep my dual XLASB machariel dps ship from running out of them while It kills the overseer) NO LOGISTICS SHIP REQUIRED. But the only reason I know that now is because I'm a sandbox PVE player playing a sandbox MMO thus i make my own damn 'content'.
|

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:15:00 -
[117] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Rek Seven wrote:
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
Once again, I like the fact that CCP are fixing parts of the game but that doesn't stop me from wanting new content to give me something new to do.
If you need ccp to add new content to give you new things to do, you're playing the wrong game. 7 years I've played and I'm still finding new things to do, even more so now that CCP is making old useless things new . I now know for a fact that an Impel can tank the citadel torp from a 10/10 while deploying a jet can of cap boosters (toi keep my dual XLASB machariel dps ship from running out of them while It kills the overseer) NO LOGISTICS SHIP REQUIRED. But the only reason I know that now is because I'm a sandbox PVE player playing a sandbox MMO thus i make my own damn 'content'.
I agree, and i'm starting to realise the game isn't for me. I play it because i love sci fi and the concept of eve sounded cool but now that i have experienced everything that interests me in EVE, it's become boring. I actually canceled my sub last week so i can take a break for the first time in four years (no, you can't have my stuff) but hopefully i'll have a reason to come back someday.
I don't know why we are all arguing tbh. I can accept that you guys are happy with the game but why can't you accept that other people derive fun from different things that you? For example, EVE pve is mundane and tedious to me to no matter how clever it made me feel that i could use industrial ships to do 10/10 sites, i would never consider it fun new content. +1 |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5255
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:19:00 -
[118] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
I don't know why we are all arguing. I can accept that you guys are happy with the game but why can't you accept that other people derive fun from different things that you?
We can
Its when you get abusive to people that dont understand why you are so unhappy with this game that leads to conflict.
If you dont like this game the way it is, why should the rest of us accept your proposed changes when the net result of that in our opinion would make us unhappy?
What is it about EvE that makes people play, but when they find they dont like it, rather than change to a game they do enjoy, they lobby to have the game itself changed?
That, my dear Doctor, is the nub of the conflict in this kind of thread.
But what do I know? Im just a simple Cardassian tailor "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6987
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:22:00 -
[119] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: That, my dear Doctor, is the nub of the conflict in this kind of thread.
But what do I know? Im just a simple Cardassian tailor
Goddamit. Have a like. A very begrudging like. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:24:00 -
[120] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: Its when you get abusive to people that dont understand why you are so unhappy with this game that leads to conflict.
If you dont like this game the way it is, why should the rest of us accept your proposed changes when the net result of that in our opinion would make us unhappy?
What is it about EvE that makes people play, but when they find they dont like it, rather than change to a game they do enjoy, they lobby to have the game itself changed?
When was i abusive? What changes did i propose that would result in you being unhappy? If new content makes you unhappy does that mean you are against the "new space" ccp has planned? 
I can't speak for everyone but the investment I've put into training my character and the social connections i've made in the game makes me want to stick around inspite of the games faults. +1 |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |