| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

kirean3464
SECTlON 31
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 19:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok guys this is not a flame post or anything like that i am simply asking other peoples opinions. Personally i feel like eve online has been stagnating for a very long time every up coming patch we seem to get a really cool video and that is about it, i mean walk on stations, walk on planets, opening the market to the dust bunnies ring mining, i feel like every patch that comes out its holy crap this looks awesome and what we actually get is possibly some new ships and then endless ship balances and ui tweeks. i mean all good stuff all important stuff but its nothing more to do i mean if your pvping thats one thing its all about the kills and the fleets etc but what if your not?
Anyone mining has to choices either hope the nice low or null sec guys wont charge you to much or shoot you or keep hoping 6 dudes in catalysts dont show up to show you why carebearing is bad. Miners need some serious buffing i mean i have mined for a long time myself and unless you fly a skiff and are willing to sacrifice yeild your nothing but a gank target and thats only every a matter of time. why would you mine with the risk of ganks the effort of selling minerals when you can just train a logi and roll into incursions which are down to such a art form there is hardly point in doing anything else to make money and the changes to the mining barges unless i messed up my maths does nothing at all so id like to see miners get something to defend themselves with against gankers ma-by some deploy able that jams when the barge gets hit or something id like to see ring mining being implemented to break the monopoly on moons since it was supposed to give moon minerals something to make mining engaging and actually worth it.
incursions i would defiantly like to see get mixed up maby some new units added to it or maby something like a tower that shoots back just something that makes it a little more interesting than shoot in the right order collect insane reward repeat mining used to be the nice safe money now its incursions and its a lot more profitable there isn't much to say on that subject as i mentioned its down to a fine art now.
pvp i am by no means one to talk about it i have not done enough of it to have an opinion i am pretty much sat farming incursions until i have all my skills at max level and all the shiny pvp ships i want before i go to learn the only point i would like to suggest on that front is when it comes to station or pos bashing i think it would be fun to let the dust bunnies take it over with you something like rip down the shields and then launch a drop ship in full of dust guys and if yours win they blow up the strontium supply, or allow them to take down poccos or something to make them active in the game but thats just an idea
as for the dust guys they simply need the market opened to us in my opinion, i play dust or at least i used to until i came to realize that even apart from the game being totally unbalanced its impossible to afford equipment ask any dust guy and they will tell you all they ever spend money on is there gun, even my guy if i was to use my best gear i cant die for the next 14 rounds if i want to break even on that expense. now i know the usual argument is "that will destroy the market" but frankly i don't think it will. there have been lots of things in eve that could have broken the market and didnt ice being changed, goonies hunting ice miners, ridiculous prices for moon materials i mean every time there is "market breaking" stuff it balances out in 2-3 weeks and there is no reason it couldn't for dust id certainly play it again if i knew i had orbital backup and someone giving me a fair contract and supplying my gear whats a fortune in dust is chicken feed in eve and it wouldn't be case of one over powering the other because you can only have so many players on a dust side and the smallest corp in eve vs the biggest can still keep that group perfectly geared up.
as for valkrye obviously nothing much to say about that but i kinda hope it becomes a option rather than a stand alone game what i mean to say is ok i can fly my abbadon the way i normally do in eve or i can switch to "valkrye" view when i get into my frigate and go nuts and of course that opens the option to the drop ship thing we were always supposed to have in dust.
i guess to sum this up i wish more content would start getting delivered into the game with more options for pilots i mean if i do anything outside incursions right now in eve im doing it for the joy of it not the money and that's kind of sad which is why im pretty much not playing right now apart from plexing and keeping my skill queue going.
again not a flame thread im simply asking peoples opinions i love eve i have been playing for years and i will never truly stop playing but i have a genuine worry that something like star citizen will come out and just outclass us and i am sad to say it the way things are going now i feel there is a real possibility of that happening since we appear to get movies of awesome content and that's about it.
thanks for reading this looking forward to reading |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5216
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 19:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote: i feel like eve online has been stagnating for a very long time
I disgree
How long have you been playing for, if I may ask?
(If its in that text-wall, I couldnt be bothered looking for it, sorry) "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
14195
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 19:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
I used the Search Function and was unable to find your point.
Can a brother get a TL:DR up in here? Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Karen Avioras
Unsung Heroes Spaceship Samurai
856
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote: i have a genuine worry that something like star citizen will come out and just outclass us ng
Not going to happen. |

Bridgette d'Iberville
Better Killing Through Chemistry
255
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
What did capital letters ever do to you? "I considered a career in griefing, but then realized that I would never achieve the level of tear generation that CCP manages to do each and every expansion." |

kirean3464
SECTlON 31
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
ok just for people who are incapable of reading
TL:DR =
i guess to sum this up i wish more content would start getting delivered into the game with more options for pilots i mean if i do anything outside incursions right now in eve im doing it for the joy of it not the money and that's kind of sad which is why im pretty much not playing right now apart from plexing and keeping my skill queue going.
again not a flame thread im simply asking peoples opinions i love eve i have been playing for years and i will never truly stop playing but i have a genuine worry that something like star citizen will come out and just outclass us and i am sad to say it the way things are going now i feel there is a real possibility of that happening since we appear to get movies of awesome content and that's about it.
|

Rin Valador
Sovereign Colonies Armed Forces
90
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
"Stagnating"
Stopped there. Every day has been new for me and I have not stopped having fun for over two years now in EvE. "There will be neither compassion nor mercy; Nor peace, nor solace For those who bear witness to these Signs And still do not believe." - The Scriptures, Book of Reclaiming 25:10 |

Karen Avioras
Unsung Heroes Spaceship Samurai
856
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:ok just for people who are incapable of reading
Quite rude from someone who is incapable of writing.
|

kirean3464
SECTlON 31
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Yes and you guys have been nothing but courteous with your reply's very clearly in a position to call someone else rude. i figured it would be like this but if i leave it up long enough i might get some actual input. |

Jake Maverick
The Scope Gallente Federation
77
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:08:00 -
[10] - Quote
Karen Avioras wrote:kirean3464 wrote: i have a genuine worry that something like star citizen will come out and just outclass us Not going to happen.
while Star Citizen is cool and all. (And I totally backed it on kick starter) It's an utterly different class of game all together. Eve is like the entire chess game. Star citizen is like when one chess piece takes another. It's all small scale sharded skirmishes. |

Qaping Pi
Solvent Green Recycling
1
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:if i do anything outside incursions right now in eve im doing it for the joy of it not the money and that's kind of sad
Dafuq??? |

Netan MalDoran
Yumping Amok Circle-Of-Two
15
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
I believe that mining doesn't need any buffs, there has to be danger to everything that makes ISK, but I totally agree on the option of merging Valkerye and EvE online as an option. "Your security status has been lowered." - Hell yeah it was! |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6957
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote: i guess to sum this up i wish more content would start getting delivered into the game
Themepark content is not what a sandbox game is all about. Whenever I hear people talk about "the future of eve" or anything to that effect, I always cringe because I know it's someone asking for CCP to turn the game into some it's not.
Quote:if i do anything outside incursions right now in eve im doing it for the joy of it not the money and that's kind of sad which is why im pretty much not playing right now apart from plexing and keeping my skill queue going.
Sweet ****ing Cotton Candy, do you hear yourself? Do you see what you just wrote? "Yeah, I am doing things in the game for fun instead of for money, and that's kind of sad..."
*head explodes*
Quote: again not a flame thread im simply asking peoples opinions i love eve i have been playing for years and i will never truly stop playing but i have a genuine worry that something like star citizen will come out and just outclass us and i am sad to say it the way things are going now i feel there is a real possibility of that happening since we appear to get movies of awesome content and that's about it.
Then go play Star Citizen. Aside from "Spaceships!" the two games are nothing alike.
And get this. EVE will live or die based on absolutely zero criteria for people like you to keep playing. Themepark content is not what made EVE what it is today, and lack thereof will not be it's death. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
3775
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
So everything getting overhauled is now stagnation?
And word from the wise: If you plan to write a wall of text, put the essence of what you will elaborate on in the very first few sentences and not just ramble on and expect anyone to read all of it. One of the few useful things I learned in school. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Alternative Splicing
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
54
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:i am pretty much sat farming incursions until i have all my skills at max level and all the shiny pvp ships i want before i go to learn
Problem discovered. Go make/partake in some content.
|

Li Quiao
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:15:00 -
[16] - Quote
Bridgette d'Iberville wrote:What did capital letters ever do to you?
His mother was badly frightened by e e cummings while she was carrying him. |

Fal Dara
Drunk Chaos Blood.Drunk
118
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:15:00 -
[17] - Quote
I think that the OP here may not be of the same gaming philosophy as many of us in eve, or, atleast me.
I for one, have been playing eve nearly (minus a year total) for 10 straight years. I Started this game a year after it came out. Do you know what it was like then? Sure, it was 10 years ago, and you might thing that there ought to be some amazing things to come out of the pipe by now, and you're right. A year in, this game had JUST interceptors for t2 ships. All t2 mods had to be produced off random lotto-drop bpos (which were further limited in number). t2 cargo expanders were 12m. t2 minng lasers were 15m. There were no dedicated mining ships (no barges, no frigs, no cruisers with bonii--nothing). We mined everything in thoraxes, and Apocalypse battleships. I was stuck in an imicus mining for 3 months. My character started WITHOUT mining or gunnery skills. There were no capital ships, getting a battleship paid for and built took WEEKS of corporate effort (chsing down a bpo owner was often the hardest part).
... i have seen what eve came from, and i dont think that it's stagnated at all. It just moves at a more ... dedicated.... pace than a large-brand-name mmo might.
In large part, i think that stems from the fact that there is no 'end game' in eve to strive for, no new clothes or swords to unlock of some new super-color. Everyone is capable of having what anyone else is -- eve is not designed for some one looking for a bling-style end game. It's not meant to cater to someone with a short attention span. It's not meant to make you feel that there's a way for you to become superior to anyone--even the lowliest noob.
In EVE, no matter how much isk you have, where you fly, or what you fly--a guy that started the game 2 weeks ago can kill you. THAT is the philosophy behind eve's game. It's strategy and risk vs reward. It's tactical and analytical. You win when you LEARN. You dont win when you acquire.
When you say you want new things--i say i do too, but i dont want then unless they fit into the larger picture of stratagy, and risk vs reward. Everything (except maybe a dramiel) has a counter. It should always be that way. A counter and a reason....
So with that in mind, what is the purpose of walking in stations? What will it add to that philosphy? It needs to, to be justified. (i for one have wanted it from day 1, my whole bio is dedicated to it from before we had the new character makers) ... but i dont want it added for the sake of it being added...
You think miners have it bad? They already have great ships--i mined for years, in every sector of space (low is the hardest btw), and to be honest, they dont have it that bad. Just fit for tank, pay a little attention (50% of gankers WARN you that they're there with smack talk in local, or call out your name--if it's not a multiboxxer). Now they have a cloaky mining ship, and you think they can do more? They have mining ships with more ehp than a battleship, and you think there should be more? As my 2 year old would say "No way! No way dude!"
I think that you havnt absorbed a great deal of what makes EVE.... EVE. |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
5480
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:16:00 -
[18] - Quote
reserved Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective.
"How did you veterans start?" |

Doreen Kaundur
490
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
EVE is very much like SNL. Keeps getting renewed long after its prime...just because.
|

kirean3464
SECTlON 31
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:29:00 -
[20] - Quote
i never stated once that content should be added for the sake of something to do i believe ring mining would have been a nice edition to the game to balance out moon mining I was simply using the walk in station bit as a example of how something was not implemented and i find that with a lot of expansions. I have mined in all areas of eve to and frankly high sec is the most dangerous so i would have to disagree there at least in low and null sec you can see who is going to shoot you in the system. and i i would have to disagree with the fit for tank statement also because outside a skiff there is no barge in the world you are tanking to survive a couple of destroyers with tech 2 guns and in my experience gankers don't gloat until after they have gotten your ship. as for the other guy my point about "if i am doing anything outside of incursions I am doing it for fun" was there is no high sec activity i am aware of that gives more isk per hour than that and it would be nice if the other activity could push something a little closer to it, and please dont reply with "then go to null or lowsec" because the point was incursions are lots of safe easy isk and i just would like to see some new additions to mix them up a bit that is all that i was speaking about |

Christopher AET
Segmentum Solar Noir. Mercenary Group
680
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
OP your wall of text is painful to read. Try constructing your sentences properly and your point may come across. Right now it's just a wall of rambling I have neither the time nor patience to decipher. I drain ducks of their moisture for sustenance. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11887
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP dont add content, they add tools so we can make our own. For example, I have spent the better part of the last 4 years trying to be the best pilot of just one hull. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
1898
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:39:00 -
[23] - Quote
That txt wall has a physicality you rarely find on the internet. For the love of literacy, use paragraphs. You want change, well go on sisi and make something, anything.
Hers the information on connecting https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6352&find=unread
"CAKE CANNOT HOLD UP TO BEING A CHARACTER DAMNIT."
Unsuccessful At Everything |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
5481
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:as for the other guy my point about "if i am doing anything outside of incursions I am doing it for fun" was there is no high sec activity i am aware of that gives more isk per hour than that and it would be nice if the other activity could push something a little closer to it, and please dont reply with "then go to null or lowsec" because the point was incursions are lots of safe easy isk and i just would like to see some new additions to mix them up a bit that is all that i was speaking about Ummmmm... what? You don't want to do "fun" because it won't make you money?
...
I'm sorry... but that is probably the most "mentally challenged" comment I have ever read.
"Fun" does not have a price tag. "Fun is just fun." Sure, you need to fund it somehow... but that's just a detail thing getting to "fun." If you have some money and want to have "fun"... DO IT. Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective.
"How did you veterans start?" |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
5481
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 20:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
duplicate post Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective.
"How did you veterans start?" |

Saraki Ishikela
Deep Space Adventure Time
17
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:04:00 -
[26] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:i never stated once that content should be added for the sake of something to do i believe ring mining would have been a nice edition to the game to balance out moon mining I was simply using the walk in station bit as a example of how something was not implemented and i find that with a lot of expansions. I have mined in all areas of eve to and frankly high sec is the most dangerous so i would have to disagree there at least in low and null sec you can see who is going to shoot you in the system. and i i would have to disagree with the fit for tank statement also because outside a skiff there is no barge in the world you are tanking to survive a couple of destroyers with tech 2 guns and in my experience gankers don't gloat until after they have gotten your ship. as for the other guy my point about "if i am doing anything outside of incursions I am doing it for fun" was there is no high sec activity i am aware of that gives more isk per hour than that and it would be nice if the other activity could push something a little closer to it, and please dont reply with "then go to null or lowsec" because the point was incursions are lots of safe easy isk and i just would like to see some new additions to mix them up a bit that is all that i was speaking about
I believe his comment pointing out that your goal is to find the best isk per hour and not the most fun per hour. Try doing something for the joy of it once in awhile and not what you'll get in return. You might actually have a good time! |

Gel Musana
LOL a Sticky Situation
31
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:04:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:kirean3464 wrote: i feel like eve online has been stagnating for a very long time I disgree How long have you been playing for, if I may ask? (If its in that text-wall, I couldnt be bothered looking for it, sorry)
It has, full-stop. +1 for all the right comments in this posting. I am totally disappointed. Even better now, expansions are gone. Now you will get only some bits. And one day you will hear that EVE Online is about to shut down. Ideology -ás-h-i-t -álist https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Gel%20Musana
|

Gel Musana
LOL a Sticky Situation
31
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
Rin Valador wrote:"Stagnating"
Stopped there. Every day has been new for me and I have not stopped having fun for over two years now in EvE.
Yes, the first 3 years are exciting. After that you find out that there is nothing else to do and that the game is not being expanded. That's where I am. Ideology -ás-h-i-t -álist https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Gel%20Musana
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6958
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Gel Musana wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:kirean3464 wrote: i feel like eve online has been stagnating for a very long time I disgree How long have you been playing for, if I may ask? (If its in that text-wall, I couldnt be bothered looking for it, sorry) It has, full-stop. +1 for all the right comments in this posting. I am totally disappointed. Even better now, expansions are gone. Now you will get only some bits. And one day you will hear that EVE Online is about to shut down.
Then by all means, save the rest of us the time and the drama, and just give me your stuff right now. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Gel Musana
LOL a Sticky Situation
31
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:09:00 -
[30] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:So everything getting overhauled is now stagnation?
And word from the wise: If you plan to write a wall of text, put the essence of what you will elaborate on in the very first few sentences and not just ramble on and expect anyone to read all of it. One of the few useful things I learned in school.
Re-balancing should be done on the side of expansions, not be the main delivery. Rubbish. Ideology -ás-h-i-t -álist https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Gel%20Musana
|

Matilda Cecilia Fock
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
98
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:12:00 -
[31] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:- You believe EVE to be stagnating. This is because you are doing things that are not dynamic by their very nature. And no... PvE can never be completely dynamic. It's a computer. Computers can be studied, recorded, analyzed, experimented with, and... ultimately... "gamed" and published for all to see. You can add more "DEV created " content... but then players will devour it over the course of a month and get bored again... necessitating more content being created... beginning a never ending cycle that ultimately results in the PvE system collapsing on itself (see: what has happened to old content in World of Warcraft).
What the DEVs are doing right now is creating and re-purposing "tools" and mechanics so that players can create their own content... with, for, and/or against one another. And this has FAR more longevity.
PvE content is not dynamic, as it's driven by pieces of code. Players generate PvP content, and that content is unpredictable and challenging.
Why players don't generate PvE content? Why PvE content isn't useful for PvP?
Let's say a miner mines a lot. The Empires love him. They give him a new device, which is triggered by anyone shooting on the miner. The single use device produces 99.99% resists for 30 seconds, plus a warp disruption bubble for 20 seconds. The miner also can call a NPC mercenary fleet, which leaves no wrecks if destroyed, but will pod any pilots trapped by the disruption bubble after CONCORD kiils their ships.
There is no way a ganker can tell whether a miner is a sitting duck or can effectively pod him with a twist of the wrist if he tries to gank the miner.
But then the ganker can PvE too, and earn a disruption bypass so he can warp out his pod before the NPC mercenaries tackle it.
So both players would be able to generate content through PvE.
Of course, that would not be EVE as we know it. But maybe it would have more future. Q: So many well known dev's left lately, should we be worried? A: (Jester): Nope. (...) Worry a lot if Fozzie, Masterplan, Rise, Veritas, Bettik, Ytterbium, Scarpia, Arrow, or even Greyscale leaves. Worry a little if Punkturis, karkur, SoniClover, Affinity, Goliath, or Xhagen leaves.
|

Gel Musana
LOL a Sticky Situation
31
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:13:00 -
[32] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Gel Musana wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:kirean3464 wrote: i feel like eve online has been stagnating for a very long time I disgree How long have you been playing for, if I may ask? (If its in that text-wall, I couldnt be bothered looking for it, sorry) It has, full-stop. +1 for all the right comments in this posting. I am totally disappointed. Even better now, expansions are gone. Now you will get only some bits. And one day you will hear that EVE Online is about to shut down. Then by all means, save the rest of us the time and the drama, and just give me your stuff right now.
Sounds very CCP lingo. I say what I want and repeat it too if I want. You save your time and give me your stuff. Ideology -ás-h-i-t -álist https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Gel%20Musana
|

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1219
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:13:00 -
[33] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:and please dont reply with "then go to null or lowsec" because the point was incursions are lots of safe easy isk and i just would like to see some new additions to mix them up a bit that is all that i was speaking about You focus to much on making isk...
In the end it's more important how you make your isk, then how much isk you are making. Find something you like doing, and find out how you can make enough isk to get by doing that, you don't always have to make the absolute maximum amount of isk. Unless you pick some profession that is not straight forward like bounty hunting or piracy, you can pretty much with every professions make enough to get some ships, buy a plex and have enough pocket change to not have to live like a bum.
I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |

Gel Musana
LOL a Sticky Situation
31
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:14:00 -
[34] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:Ok guys this is not a flame post or anything like that i am simply asking other peoples opinions. Personally i feel like eve online has been stagnating for a very long time every up coming patch we seem to get a really cool video and that is about it, i mean walk on stations, walk on planets, opening the market to the dust bunnies ring mining, i feel like every patch that comes out its holy crap this looks awesome and what we actually get is possibly some new ships and then endless ship balances and ui tweeks. i mean all good stuff all important stuff but its nothing more to do i mean if your pvping thats one thing its all about the kills and the fleets etc but what if your not?
Anyone mining has to choices either hope the nice low or null sec guys wont charge you to much or shoot you or keep hoping 6 dudes in catalysts dont show up to show you why carebearing is bad. Miners need some serious buffing i mean i have mined for a long time myself and unless you fly a skiff and are willing to sacrifice yeild your nothing but a gank target and thats only every a matter of time. why would you mine with the risk of ganks the effort of selling minerals when you can just train a logi and roll into incursions which are down to such a art form there is hardly point in doing anything else to make money and the changes to the mining barges unless i messed up my maths does nothing at all so id like to see miners get something to defend themselves with against gankers ma-by some deploy able that jams when the barge gets hit or something id like to see ring mining being implemented to break the monopoly on moons since it was supposed to give moon minerals something to make mining engaging and actually worth it.
incursions i would defiantly like to see get mixed up maby some new units added to it or maby something like a tower that shoots back just something that makes it a little more interesting than shoot in the right order collect insane reward repeat mining used to be the nice safe money now its incursions and its a lot more profitable there isn't much to say on that subject as i mentioned its down to a fine art now.
pvp i am by no means one to talk about it i have not done enough of it to have an opinion i am pretty much sat farming incursions until i have all my skills at max level and all the shiny pvp ships i want before i go to learn the only point i would like to suggest on that front is when it comes to station or pos bashing i think it would be fun to let the dust bunnies take it over with you something like rip down the shields and then launch a drop ship in full of dust guys and if yours win they blow up the strontium supply, or allow them to take down poccos or something to make them active in the game but thats just an idea
as for the dust guys they simply need the market opened to us in my opinion, i play dust or at least i used to until i came to realize that even apart from the game being totally unbalanced its impossible to afford equipment ask any dust guy and they will tell you all they ever spend money on is there gun, even my guy if i was to use my best gear i cant die for the next 14 rounds if i want to break even on that expense. now i know the usual argument is "that will destroy the market" but frankly i don't think it will. there have been lots of things in eve that could have broken the market and didnt ice being changed, goonies hunting ice miners, ridiculous prices for moon materials i mean every time there is "market breaking" stuff it balances out in 2-3 weeks and there is no reason it couldn't for dust id certainly play it again if i knew i had orbital backup and someone giving me a fair contract and supplying my gear whats a fortune in dust is chicken feed in eve and it wouldn't be case of one over powering the other because you can only have so many players on a dust side and the smallest corp in eve vs the biggest can still keep that group perfectly geared up.
as for valkrye obviously nothing much to say about that but i kinda hope it becomes a option rather than a stand alone game what i mean to say is ok i can fly my abbadon the way i normally do in eve or i can switch to "valkrye" view when i get into my frigate and go nuts and of course that opens the option to the drop ship thing we were always supposed to have in dust.
i guess to sum this up i wish more content would start getting delivered into the game with more options for pilots i mean if i do anything outside incursions right now in eve im doing it for the joy of it not the money and that's kind of sad which is why im pretty much not playing right now apart from plexing and keeping my skill queue going.
again not a flame thread im simply asking peoples opinions i love eve i have been playing for years and i will never truly stop playing *Snip* Please refrain from discussing other (non-EvE/Dust/Valkyrie) games. ISD Ezwal. we appear to get movies of awesome content and that's about it.
thanks for reading this looking forward to reading
It has, full-stop. +1 for all the right comments in this posting. I am totally disappointed. Even better now, expansions are gone. Now you will get only some bits. And one day you will hear that EVE Online is about to shut down. Ideology -ás-h-i-t -álist https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Gel%20Musana
|

Xercodo
Xovoni Astronautical Manufacturing and Engineering
3568
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
They have added a bunch of stuff, or revitalized existing things to make them more viable, and yet you still won't step away from your precious incursions.
The lack of things to do isn't the problem you caring about them is. The Drake is a Lie |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1569
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote: Personally i feel like eve online has been stagnating for a very long time
I agree. In my opinion, CCP have not added anything substantial for as long as i've been playing and i've become board to the point where i only log on to add skills or set up my PI.
For as long as i've played the game, CCP have shared their grand plans to shake eve up (ring mining, wis, new asteroid physics, visible damage on ships, new tactical overlay) but they never really deliver on their promises. All we get are a few fixes of old content and some new ships/mods. Don't get me wrong, a lot of the features in the game have been improved over the last three years but turning bad things into acceptable things is not a cause for celebration in my book.
Despite recent ship balancing and mechanic tweaks, I think CCP are scared of making any real changes to the way the game works. Mining is still a joke, local as a free intel tool still exists, the farming of incursions is ridiculous unbalanced in terms of risk vs reward, and pvp is just a game of rock-paper-scissors.
I think most of my feeling of disappointment come from the fact that i live in wormhole space which haven't seen any worthwhile new content added since the wormhole expansion was released.
Unfortunately, i think i'm going to have to unsubscribe my main until the game picks up again, as plex prices are way too high to pay if all i'm doing is training skills and bitching on the forums.  +1 |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11889
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:27:00 -
[37] - Quote
Gel Musana wrote:Abrazzar wrote:So everything getting overhauled is now stagnation?
And word from the wise: If you plan to write a wall of text, put the essence of what you will elaborate on in the very first few sentences and not just ramble on and expect anyone to read all of it. One of the few useful things I learned in school. Re-balancing should be done on the side of expansions, not be the main delivery. Rubbish.
No, fixing the game is more important than anything else. The ship rebalace has provided more content than any "content expansion". Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6961
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:29:00 -
[38] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Gel Musana wrote:Abrazzar wrote:So everything getting overhauled is now stagnation?
And word from the wise: If you plan to write a wall of text, put the essence of what you will elaborate on in the very first few sentences and not just ramble on and expect anyone to read all of it. One of the few useful things I learned in school. Re-balancing should be done on the side of expansions, not be the main delivery. Rubbish. No, fixing the game is more important than anything else. The ship rebalace has provided more content than any "content expansion".
+1 to this. Jesus features are just more crap that will have to get fixed eventually. Make the game work from the ground up, first last and always. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1543

|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
19. All posts must be related to EVE Online.
Posts regarding other companies and products or services are prohibited and any content of this nature will be removed. Posts regarding other games are however permitted on the Out of Pod Experience forum for the purposes of discussion only.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Prince Kobol
1944
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:34:00 -
[40] - Quote
I do agree that Eve is in a period of stagnation.
You could argue that the PCU count supports this argument.
Whilst the content updates we have been getting over the past 18 months is all well and good, I feel that until the thorny issue of Sov mechanics are tackled then the stagnation will continue.
As for the PvE aspects of the game, sure a lot could be done to improve it however here we have a problem.
Lets say for arguments sake that CCP make NPC rats in both missions and incursions much more intelligent, random spawns in missions, disabling Concord in systems were Incursions occur, make asteroids just lumps of rocks that requiring scanning being you mine then and all the other things people have posted over the years to make PvE activities much more interesting and involved.
I guarantee you see the forum flooded with posts from people crying literally seas of tears and threatening to quit because they are no longer able to run their missions / Incursion semi afk whilst watching their favourite TV show on Net flicks / Reading a book, fapping etc
I swear the amount of butt hurt would be truly mind blowing.
My personal view is that CCP looks at the PvE side as a necessary evil, a way for players to earn isk to allow them to PvP in the easiest and most effortless way possible without actually just giving them isk.
I can not think of any other reason why after all these years it is still as mind numbing and tedious as it is now.
I have tried pretty much everything there is to do in Eve over the years and personally I find all forms of PvE awful. I hate doing any PvE. If I had the money I would just buy plex's and never PvE again... ever.
As for PvP,
FW was fun for a short while but became very repetitive. Far too many people using alts in multiple stabbed cloaky frigs. FW is more of a way to earn isk for most then a form of PvP.
Tried HS war Deccing but 95% of time players would just leave the corp and the rest would just never undock. Lots of fun 
Gate Camping, no thanks.
Low Sec / Null Sec, I find our FC's more entertaining then the actual fights most of the times.
WH - For me the fact that you can just visit a website and get detailed information on every WH has kind of ruined it for me. For me WH's should be a place of mystery and down to the us, the players to explore them by actually going in and flying around, not by opening up a website.
I mean you can have a full detailed list of every WH that your static will connect to.. where the hell is the mystery or fun in that?
The only thing I really truly enjoy is corp roams and again, it mostly because of the people I am flying with then the actual game mechanics themselves.
I can't see much changing for me until Sov Mechanics are improved.
|

Quinn Corvez
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
237
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:baltec1 wrote:Gel Musana wrote:Abrazzar wrote:So everything getting overhauled is now stagnation?
And word from the wise: If you plan to write a wall of text, put the essence of what you will elaborate on in the very first few sentences and not just ramble on and expect anyone to read all of it. One of the few useful things I learned in school. Re-balancing should be done on the side of expansions, not be the main delivery. Rubbish. No, fixing the game is more important than anything else. The ship rebalace has provided more content than any "content expansion". +1 to this. Jesus features are just more crap that will have to get fixed eventually. Make the game work from the ground up, first last and always.
Fixing old content and reballancing ships is like removeing potholes from a road. The jorney is improved and more people might use the road but the destenation is still the same. Fixes and changes are not new content, new content would be adding a new road that leads to a new destination.
Jesus features attrack new people and keep the game feeling fresh and exciting. PI and Incursions are the most recent examples of jesus features that add new content for many people in eve.
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system. Pluse, that thinking lets them get away with releasing broken content in the future. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11890
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:48:00 -
[42] - Quote
CCP started working on sov several patches ago with a big one coming in about six weeks. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11890
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:50:00 -
[43] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Fixing old content and reballancing ships is like removeing potholes from a road. The jorney is improved and more people might use the road but the destenation is still the same. Fixes and changes are not new content, new content would be adding a new road that leads to a new destination.
Jesus features attrack new people and keep the game feeling fresh and exciting. PI and Incursions are the most recent examples of jesus features that add new content for many people in eve.
The industrial rebalance in six weeks will add more content that those two expansions combined. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6961
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 21:51:00 -
[44] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote: Jesus features attrack new people and keep the game feeling fresh and exciting. PI and Incursions are the most recent examples of jesus features that add new content for many people in eve.
Please, regale me with how many players the game has retained because of Planetary Interaction. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Quinn Corvez
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
237
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:01:00 -
[45] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote: Jesus features attrack new people and keep the game feeling fresh and exciting. PI and Incursions are the most recent examples of jesus features that add new content for many people in eve.
Please, regale me with how many players the game has retained because of Planetary Interaction.
You don't "regale" numbers...
I could ask you to do the same thing. Give me the exact number of players retained by making battleships slightly less crap than they already where. It's a stupid and pointless question.
If you want to do your own reaserch, go an look at the server numbers around expansion releases. Expansions that have no content don't retain players. Failing that go to the wormhole section of the forums and tell all the people there that they don't exist. |

Quinn Corvez
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
237
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:06:00 -
[46] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:Fixing old content and reballancing ships is like removeing potholes from a road. The jorney is improved and more people might use the road but the destenation is still the same. Fixes and changes are not new content, new content would be adding a new road that leads to a new destination.
Jesus features attrack new people and keep the game feeling fresh and exciting. PI and Incursions are the most recent examples of jesus features that add new content for many people in eve.
The industrial rebalance in six weeks will add more content that those two expansions combined.
No it won't. It will improve existing cotent. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6961
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:06:00 -
[47] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:
I could ask you to do the same thing. Give me the exact number of players retained by making battleships slightly less crap than they already where. It's a stupid and pointless question.
And unlike a Jesus feature, that takes a few weeks of dev time at most. Unlike, oh, I don't know, Incarna. Which took a few years. The merits of the two cannot be compared.
Quote: If you want to do your own reaserch, go an look at the server numbers around expansion releases. Expansions that have no content don't retain players. Failing that go to the wormhole section of the forums and tell all the people there that they don't exist.
"content" this, "content" that.
This is a sandbox game. Stop demanding to be spoonfed. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11890
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:baltec1 wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:Fixing old content and reballancing ships is like removeing potholes from a road. The jorney is improved and more people might use the road but the destenation is still the same. Fixes and changes are not new content, new content would be adding a new road that leads to a new destination.
Jesus features attrack new people and keep the game feeling fresh and exciting. PI and Incursions are the most recent examples of jesus features that add new content for many people in eve.
The industrial rebalance in six weeks will add more content that those two expansions combined. No it won't. It will improve existing cotent.
There is right now zero industry in null aside from the building of supercaps.
Every null power is in the process of a total restructuring of their space to create industrial hubs to supply their own forces. The undertaking is massive and will result is sweeping changes across the entire game that will impact everyone. This change is going to provide a massive amount of content to a much bigger number of players. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Remiel Pollard
The 0th Fleet A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3400
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
Oh you're absolutely right.
Were you here for Incarna? Unfortunately, quality control was exactly what they did not do for the sake of releasing some new half-arsed 'Jesus Feature' as you call it, while many aspects of the game remained in a badly unbalanced and even sometimes unfinished state. What really upset people was how unfinished the 'Jesus Feature' was at the expense of those fixes.
Then, they started fixing stuff. They acknowledged that they screwed up, and started fixing all the stuff that was broken. There was so much that they're still fixing stuff. There's a lot less left to fix now because of it.
The initial screw up lost them a lot of subs. The turn around won them back. What that told CCP was that players prefer a functional game, and the ones that want new content spoon-fed to them on a daily basis are in a minority, because everyone else is busy creating their own.
Every time someone tells me to do my own research, I know they haven't done much of their own, probably just settled into agreement with the first opinion they came across that validated their own, or they haven't done the proper analysis to understand what the research means. Meanwhile, they often leave out some of the most glaringly obvious basic facts. For example, anti-vaxxers tell me to 'do my research' while complaining about toxins being injected into the bloodstream. Meanwhile, vaccines don't get injected into the bloodstream, they are injected into muscle tissue, so you know right away they don't know **** about vaccines.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
[email protected] |

Xuixien
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
1256
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
Hello again kirean. Reading your post, all I can think about is the time I WarDec'd your corp, and you guys stayed either offline or docked up for the week. No wonder you feel the way you do. You see, EVE is not stagnating. What you're actually feeling is boredom with your playstyle. This boredom, coupled with your fear of trying anything else, is what's bringing your EVE career to a crashing halt.
There are so many amazing things to do in EVE besides mine and mission in HiSec. But you don't seem willing to try those things. It's not CCPs job to provide fun for you. CCP only provides you with a gigantic toolbox. It's your job, as the player, to build and create things with that toolbox. You are not willing to do that, or to get involved in a group doing that. For players like you, yes, EVE will become stagnant and you will take breaks or just quit altogether. The game will not suffer from your loss, however.
My suggestion to you is to learn what the core values of EVE Online are. After absorbing that, start watching Fanfest presentations and get involved in the CSM. You don't have to run for CSM, but just get involved in a dialogue with them. And always remember; the health of EVE Online as a whole is far, far more important than your myopic enjoyment of HiSec mining. Approach the subject with more humility instead of demanding that the Devs cater to your playstyle.
That said, I do feel that HiSec needs some livening up to encourage more content, more conflict, and more players organizing themselves into meaningful groups. I'll probably write a blog about it sometime.
Take care kirean, and remember; in every color there's the light, and in every stone sleeps a crystal. This is-á a signature. |

Quinn Corvez
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
237
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something.
Yeah i was around for incarna and it sounds like i have a better grasp on the situation than you. The outrage surrounding incarna came from CCPs failure to deliver what was promised while at the same time, leaving broken parts of the game untended to.
If CCP delivered what they told everyone they were working on for the past few years, the the summer of rage would have never happened. Unfortunately after years of developement all we got was one room and some -ú50 pants so it is no wonder people quit.
Seriously, go and do your own reaserch because I'm to here to prove anything to you. There was a recent article on one of the news sites that indicated that patches without content have trouble keeping new players.
If you love the game already and the slight improvements are improving your experience, i'm very happy for you. I'm simply bored with doing the same old stuff over and over again, and doing that stuff even more ("go out and create your own content") won't change that.
All i want is something new and fun to do while i wait for ccp to fix the old parts of the game. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6964
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:52:00 -
[52] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote: I'm simply bored with doing the same old stuff over and over again, and doing that stuff even more ("go out and create your own content") won't change that.
All i want is something new and fun to do while i wait for ccp to fix the old parts of the game.
Ever tried something besides PvE? That'd be my recommendation. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Quinn Corvez
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
237
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:55:00 -
[53] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:baltec1 wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:Fixing old content and reballancing ships is like removeing potholes from a road. The jorney is improved and more people might use the road but the destenation is still the same. Fixes and changes are not new content, new content would be adding a new road that leads to a new destination.
Jesus features attrack new people and keep the game feeling fresh and exciting. PI and Incursions are the most recent examples of jesus features that add new content for many people in eve.
The industrial rebalance in six weeks will add more content that those two expansions combined. No it won't. It will improve existing cotent. There is right now zero industry in null aside from the building of supercaps. Every null power is in the process of a total restructuring of their space to create industrial hubs to supply their own forces. The undertaking is massive and will result is sweeping changes across the entire game that will impact everyone. This change is going to provide a massive amount of content to a much bigger number of players.
Okay, you explained what you meant more clearly here and i agree with you. Fingers crossed that the industrial patch will bring about those sort of changes.
I have an industry alt and if these changes improve the industry game a lot, it might keep me from quitting. |

Quinn Corvez
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
237
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 22:59:00 -
[54] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote: I'm simply bored with doing the same old stuff over and over again, and doing that stuff even more ("go out and create your own content") won't change that.
All i want is something new and fun to do while i wait for ccp to fix the old parts of the game. Ever tried something besides PvE? That'd be my recommendation.
Ever tried not being an idiot that doesn't know what he's talking about?
I have experienced everything in eve barring incursions so don't try and lable me a carebear to support your weak arguments.
|

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
637
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 23:27:00 -
[55] - Quote
Did not read all the replies, and some that I glanced at were a tad annoying... but I digress.
To the op:
So let me see if I understand you correctly... you are complaining, because they are fixing issues and old features, but instead you want them to add new features...
Let me give you a brief history lesson. As a 10 year straight vet, who has been here since nearly the start, I am some insite.
This was EVE:
"Hey guys, this new expantion, we are calling Exodus, we are letting you form alliances, and giving you star bases so you can claim 0.0. We are also bringing dreads to shoot the star bases. You will be able to claim sov. In addition, we are brining in new mining barges, and then comet mining, oh! and system wide asteroid belts to accomidate, as we would like to add other things but we will see"
a few weeks late " Unfortunatly guys we have to cu comet mining, not enough time to do it right, but we will look at it soon(tm)"
a few more weeks "Unfortunatly we have to cut system wide belts, the servers will melt, but in the future we will do it"
two weeks before release "Unforunatly the dread has ben changed, some of the stuf we said it could do, yea we cant"
one week before "oh man we need to move this feature of alliances to another expantion, sorry guys we will work on"
months after relase "oh we know pos bashing is annoying, yea we will have to think of something a bit later"
A few years later: "Guys we are making this new game called dust, in order to accomidate all the stuff we want with dust we are giving you this new expantion that has to do with interacting with planets, you will use the dust mercs to conquer other players stuff, and what they are shoot is stuff you guys placed. This will also tie into sov and change things up it will be great!"
few weeks before launch "oh no we scrapped all that, here is the new pi, we will look at it soon"
a few years later "Oh yea we are changing sov, you need these new devices, and then they will be dynamic so we can add more stuff later, and this will help us revamp the pos system, its going to be awesome when all is done, this is just the first step! We also are changing contracts and giving you treaties!"
few weeks before launch "Treaties are out, we will tackle them next time, and the other sov stuff will come later we have to try tthis first"
The point is, CCP would make a feature, not have the time to finish what they want, so they would give us the bare min, then leave it and move on to something else.
So in essence what you are saying is 'Yea eve is stagnating because ccp is FINALLY fixing things that have been broken for years, but screw that, I want more broken new stuff that will drive me nuts in a few months, then more broken new stuff on top of that!"
The future of eve, looks damn good. If they fix the old and broken, then they an make way for new stuff, that is actually fully done and fully working. That's a big if though. But you are esentually a noobin who has no idea what your talking about. 10 years of eve... yea i'm an addict |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
637
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 23:37:00 -
[56] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote: I'm simply bored with doing the same old stuff over and over again, and doing that stuff even more ("go out and create your own content") won't change that.
All i want is something new and fun to do while i wait for ccp to fix the old parts of the game. Ever tried something besides PvE? That'd be my recommendation. Ever tried not being an idiot that doesn't know what he's talking about? I have experienced everything in eve barring incursions so don't try and lable me a carebear to support your weak arguments.
So you have ran a corp? an alliance? invented? salavaged? mine? built? market traded? scammed? recruited? stolen moon goo with siphones? rand 30 pos' single handedly while avoding gate camps with your hauler full of fuel? pirated? anti pirated? solo pvp? fleet pvp? fleet commanded? pos bashed? explorded everything? factional war fare? PI? rand a lottery? ran a bank? ran a pawn shop? stolen ships? forced ransoms? dome mercenary work? spied? back stabbed your friends? stolen all yoru corps asstest after years of gaining trust?
I highly doubt you have done everything. As eve is a sandbox there is no 'everything' New content is being added, we just got a while new set of ships to fly that change the dynamic, as well as new spawns in low sec that have made hunting in low sec enjoyable.
You don't just look at your house and go 'you know what? my foundation is broken, i'm gonna add another floor!" That's illogical and stupid. And it makes you actually look like a noobin fool 10 years of eve... yea i'm an addict |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18723
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 23:50:00 -
[57] - Quote
For CCP to introduce new content they need a solid base to build it upon.
That solid base is what they are currently building by fixing all of the stuff that they've left broken or unfinished because somebody thought that Jesus features, that like everything else are left unfinished or broken, were a good idea. Eve is an introduction to teamwork, paranoia, dealing with consequences, coping with loss, economics, long term planning, bartering, astronomy, and the theory of space submarine travel.
Nil mortifi sine lucre |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6968
|
Posted - 2014.06.11 23:51:00 -
[58] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote: I'm simply bored with doing the same old stuff over and over again, and doing that stuff even more ("go out and create your own content") won't change that.
All i want is something new and fun to do while i wait for ccp to fix the old parts of the game. Ever tried something besides PvE? That'd be my recommendation. Ever tried not being an idiot that doesn't know what he's talking about? I have experienced everything in eve barring incursions so don't try and lable me a carebear to support your weak arguments.
Firstly, I highly doubt your claim.
Secondly, "carebear" is not about what you do. It's a mindset, it's an attitude.
And begging for "more content" fits that attitude nicely. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Lugia3
Intentionally Dense Easily Excited
982
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 00:22:00 -
[59] - Quote
How funny is the boring stuff? Pirate character now, not as someone or something support. Want to explore the ship is said to keep all accessories. He said to keep all accessories ship to explore. "CCP Dolan is full of ****." - CCP Bettik |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2203
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 00:25:00 -
[60] - Quote
... is bright! The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2203
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 00:28:00 -
[61] - Quote
For someone who claims he has experienced everything ...
... I wonder why nobody knows you then.
Because in EVE, you can experience fame too.
Got anything else to say?`
Hey and how many alts does this guy actually use? The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Xuixien
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
1258
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 00:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:"carebear" is not about what you do. It's a mindset, it's an attitude.
A thousand and one times this. This is-á a signature. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5226
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 00:36:00 -
[63] - Quote
So...
TL:DR the entire thread;
The people who enjoy the game vs those who hate it and are "unsubbing" until it "picks up"
Yeah well
Go on
Do it
I double dog dare you "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2203
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 00:37:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:So...
TL:DR the entire thread;
THe people who enjoy the game vs those who hate it and are "unsubbing" until it "picks up"
Yeah well
Go on
Do it
I double dog dare you Hahahahahahahahahha xD The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
162
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:05:00 -
[65] - Quote
Doreen Kaundur wrote:EVE is very much like SNL. Keeps getting renewed long after its prime...just because.
I think I need to wash my eyes after reading that :D
SNL was only ever bad... except for... the 70s/80s hehe http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Jamwara+DelCalicoe+Ashley |

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
162
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:08:00 -
[66] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So...
TL:DR the entire thread;
THe people who enjoy the game vs those who hate it and are "unsubbing" until it "picks up"
Yeah well
Go on
Do it
I double dog dare you Hahahahahahahahahha xD
Triple dog dare!! Lick the light pole... http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Jamwara+DelCalicoe+Ashley |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2205
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So...
TL:DR the entire thread;
THe people who enjoy the game vs those who hate it and are "unsubbing" until it "picks up"
Yeah well
Go on
Do it
I double dog dare you Hahahahahahahahahha xD Triple dog dare!! Lick the light pole... I don't lick poles. ;) The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
162
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:13:00 -
[68] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So...
TL:DR the entire thread;
THe people who enjoy the game vs those who hate it and are "unsubbing" until it "picks up"
Yeah well
Go on
Do it
I double dog dare you Hahahahahahahahahha xD Triple dog dare!! Lick the light pole... I don't lick poles. ;)
mhmmkay. what do you do to them? http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Jamwara+DelCalicoe+Ashley |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2205
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:15:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So...
TL:DR the entire thread;
THe people who enjoy the game vs those who hate it and are "unsubbing" until it "picks up"
Yeah well
Go on
Do it
I double dog dare you Hahahahahahahahahha xD Triple dog dare!! Lick the light pole... I don't lick poles. ;) mhmmkay. what do you do to them? Nononono, the emphasis is on the pole.
You should ask what I lick. ;) The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5233
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:22:00 -
[70] - Quote
Polish are stronk "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2205
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:23:00 -
[71] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:and my comments get isd'd....  With that pyramid you just made, I'd ISD your comments too!
The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2205
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:23:00 -
[72] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk Is this an intended filler, to reach the next page? The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5233
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:25:00 -
[73] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk Is this an intended filler, to reach the next page?
You just said you werent keen on Poles
Btw, you always look so much better with hair "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2209
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 01:26:00 -
[74] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk Is this an intended filler, to reach the next page? You just said you werent keen on Poles Btw, you always look so much better with hair Gee thanks! :) Btw, this is resculpted for a PLEX. (:
Aaahhh ... the poles! Dammit, I didn't get it!
That was smart! :D The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Sir SmashAlot
The League of Extraordinary Opportunists Intergalactic Conservation Movement
126
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 02:27:00 -
[75] - Quote
In my opinion, EVE is a game where is it is not the responsibility of the developers to create content, but it is on the players to make the game fun for themselves.
There is a world of fun content out there. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5243
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 03:07:00 -
[76] - Quote
In EvE Online;
CONTENT create DEVELOPER! "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Michael Ruckert
SECURE TRANSPORTS
149
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 03:46:00 -
[77] - Quote
The only thing stagnating here is the quality of postings about EVE stagnating. "No matter how well you perform there's always somebody of intelligent opinion who thinks it's lousy." - Laurence Olivier |

Nami Kumamato
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
212
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 08:49:00 -
[78] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk Is this an intended filler, to reach the next page? You just said you werent keen on Poles Btw, you always look so much better with hair Gee thanks! :) Btw, this is resculpted for a PLEX. (:
Yeap, always better with it.
Also OP can I haz your stuff when you quit? I'm in like a dire need of funds...
"And now my ship is oh so cloaked and fit It never felt so good, I never felt so hid" - Ramona McCandless, Untitled |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1570
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 10:26:00 -
[79] - Quote
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If you think that the game will do better in the long run by fixing old content rather than adding new stuff that's your opinion but i would hope that the eve community is mature/intelligent enough to realise the benefits of new content for both old and new players.
Personally i want to see a mix of both which is kind of what we are getting now. Unfortunately, CCP seems to be continuing the trend of implementing poorly designed new content (e.g. some of the mobile deployables and the Nestor), which leads me to the assumption that this cycle of fixing broken content and balancing ships will never end.
For those of you that believe fixes alone are the answer to all the problems, please take a look at the following information. Server numbers are steadily declining and they are almost as low as they were during the summer of rage. The highest they have ever been was between the incursion and incarna releases, so make of that what you will... http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility +1 |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
1117
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 10:32:00 -
[80] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:Inserted some punctuation to enhance readability. ISD Ezwal. That one is new.  Stupidity should be a bannable offense.
Also This --> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=216699
Please stop making "afk cloak" threads, thanks in advance. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11893
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 10:37:00 -
[81] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk
*****. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
1117
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 10:38:00 -
[82] - Quote
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote:PvE content is not dynamic, as it's driven by pieces of code. Players generate PvP content, and that content is unpredictable and challenging.
Why players don't generate PvE content? That would be a paradoxon I believe.  Stupidity should be a bannable offense.
Also This --> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=216699
Please stop making "afk cloak" threads, thanks in advance. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1373
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:12:00 -
[83] - Quote
Matilda Cecilia Fock wrote: PvE content is not dynamic, as it's driven by pieces of code. Players generate PvP content, and that content is unpredictable and challenging.
Unpredictable PvE can be created that can at times be challenging. Players don't like that though. They want to be able to take their Ishtar to an anom and know it will take about 10 minutes to complete and they will get about x isk normally, y loot and a z chance at a big drop. The system to do it isn't even particularly demanding in terms of code layout. It's just a matter of them deciding to do it and making the huge database backing it, and smoothing out the bumps. Then working how to present it to players in such a way that players have some information rather than total randomness, but can't look it up on a website how to do the site. |

Ahost Gceo
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
147
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:13:00 -
[84] - Quote
Michael Ruckert wrote:The only thing stagnating here is the quality of postings about EVE stagnating. There was quality to the posting here to begin with? It's either been people sympathizing with the OP or people simplying exercising a Neanderthal mindset and insisting that EVE is fine the way it is while making fun of his less than concise thought processes, "everyone +1 my comment because I'm like so super edgy and hardcore and you're so super stupid lol."
While how the OP presented his point left me cringing for a while, I think what he is trying to highlight is that some aspects in the game need some more depth and immersion. Mining is the best example because its as simple as targetting a rock and then pewing it for hours on end for a meager payout that doesn't justify the time wasted. In my mind at least, mining could benefit from a minigame like hacking in data and relic sites has (or something like how you mine in Galaxy on Fire 2 for mobile OS). Some people like that minigame, some don't, but at least it gives you something to do where currently besides hoping you can run away from Catalysts (who are taking advantage of a long broken system) there is absolutely no reason to stay at the keyboard.
Other game aspects that could use some love are missions and wormhole Sleeper content. Missions have been gamed out for years and are rather shallow when it comes to immersion in the storyline. Sleeper content has been that stinger at the end of the movie credits that hasn't been played out, and I would sorely like to see more about the legacy of those who made the Sleepers as aell as the Talocan. Sansha's Incursions? I love the concept and it seems the difficulty of the AI is there, but I wish they had a discernable game-wide effect. Maybe you could fight Sansha's True Slaves in Legion? Just a few thoughts. I'm a friggin' banana. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2227
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:17:00 -
[85] - Quote
Debora Tsung wrote:kirean3464 wrote:Inserted some punctuation to enhance readability. ISD Ezwal. That one is new.  I was baffled when I saw this.
Instead of dismissing people who have not even the slightest standards, he instead makes it worse for himself and everybody else.
Imagine if he kept doing it ... people will start demanding that the ISDs can correct their posts for them. The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2227
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:22:00 -
[86] - Quote
Ahost Gceo wrote:In my mind at least, mining could benefit from a minigame like hacking in data and relic sites has. The whole point of mining is to give people an activity they can do, while not actually having to be there.
If you weed through a history of changes, CCP only changed those afk-able activities, (e.g. afk drone dominix) that made no sense to be afk-able in the first place.
The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6978
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:27:00 -
[87] - Quote
Ahost Gceo wrote: Other game aspects that could use some love are missions and wormhole Sleeper content. Missions have been gamed out for years and are rather shallow when it comes to immersion in the storyline.
If they wasted a few months dev time to "improve" missions, this game's community would have them gamed out again in about two weeks.
And that's the problem with talking about "improving" PvE content. You don't really mean improving, you mean rotate it a little bit because you're bored. And after you get bored with this new one, you will demand it be redone over again. Ad nauseum.
Well, the truth is that shooting red crosses is never going to be anything but shooting red crosses. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2229
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:32:00 -
[88] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ahost Gceo wrote: Other game aspects that could use some love are missions and wormhole Sleeper content. Missions have been gamed out for years and are rather shallow when it comes to immersion in the storyline.
If they wasted a few months dev time to "improve" missions, this game's community would have them gamed out again in about two weeks. And that's the problem with talking about "improving" PvE content. You don't really mean improving, you mean rotate it a little bit because you're bored. And after you get bored with this new one, you will demand it be redone over again. Ad nauseum. Well, the truth is that shooting red crosses is never going to be anything but shooting red crosses. There is actually a way to improve PvE, but they wouldn't like it.
One just has to look at the general PvE masses to fix the whole issue.
- Procedurally generated missions with unpredictable triggers and damage types. - Inability to blitz missions. Instead, all rats always need to be destroyed. - Add random elements to missions, like for example a 20% chance of a surprise npc fleet entering the mission, whipping the floor with the mission runners ass if he's not smart enough to deal with it.
The whole issue with PvE has nothing to do with CCP, but with people who want it too easy. And it IS too easy.
The PvE playerbase would be cut in HALF at LEAST if it wasn't this damn easy for these people to get their fake satisfaction to inflate their worthless egos.
And then, hopefully, proper players join who don't mind actually having to put effort into things. The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

flakeys
Guinea pig inc
2226
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:33:00 -
[89] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:i guess to sum this up i wish more content would start getting delivered into the game with more options for pilots i mean if i do anything outside incursions right now in eve im doing it for the joy of it not the money and that's kind of sad which is why im pretty much not playing right now apart from plexing and keeping my skill queue going.
What the actuall **** ???????
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
3782
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:35:00 -
[90] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ahost Gceo wrote: Other game aspects that could use some love are missions and wormhole Sleeper content. Missions have been gamed out for years and are rather shallow when it comes to immersion in the storyline.
If they wasted a few months dev time to "improve" missions, this game's community would have them gamed out again in about two weeks. And that's the problem with talking about "improving" PvE content. You don't really mean improving, you mean rotate it a little bit because you're bored. And after you get bored with this new one, you will demand it be redone over again. Ad nauseum. Well, the truth is that shooting red crosses is never going to be anything but shooting red crosses. They could spend a few months to design a procedural system for missions, like a random dungeon generator. So you will only get a general gist and maybe a threat level estimation from the mission description while the exact configuration is unknown and prone to offer a surprise or two.
And while they're at it, they could condense mission rats to be more in line with the ships players are using, albeit at a lowish skill level. And adapt them to the changes of pirate factions. And have them spawn drones when in aggression range. Make it less predictable and imitate player behaviour more. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Remiel Pollard
The 0th Fleet A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3422
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:41:00 -
[91] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something. go and do your own reaserch
Spell research properly before attempting to come across as intellectually superior. If you'd read what I wrote, like, actually read it, I said, in no uncertain terms, what you said - the outrage was about an unfinished feature at the expense of fixes to existing broken features. Don't tell me to do my own "reaserch" [sic] if you can't even read.
As an addendum, doing your own research is pointless without proper analysis. Your vexatious delivery of this 'instruction' parallels similar deliveries by various deniers across the face of the planet - vaccine deniers, heliocentricity deniers, old earth deniers, and science deniers in general - complete with flying spittle and all. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
[email protected] |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6979
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:42:00 -
[92] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ahost Gceo wrote: Other game aspects that could use some love are missions and wormhole Sleeper content. Missions have been gamed out for years and are rather shallow when it comes to immersion in the storyline.
If they wasted a few months dev time to "improve" missions, this game's community would have them gamed out again in about two weeks. And that's the problem with talking about "improving" PvE content. You don't really mean improving, you mean rotate it a little bit because you're bored. And after you get bored with this new one, you will demand it be redone over again. Ad nauseum. Well, the truth is that shooting red crosses is never going to be anything but shooting red crosses. They could spend a few months to design a procedural system for missions, like a random dungeon generator. So you will only get a general gist and maybe a threat level estimation from the mission description while the exact configuration is unknown and prone to offer a surprise or two. And while they're at it, they could condense mission rats to be more in line with the ships players are using, albeit at a lowish skill level. And adapt them to the changes of pirate factions. And have them spawn drones when in aggression range. Make it less predictable and imitate player behaviour more.
If they made PvE gameplay something people actually have to think about, the howling from the PvE players would throw the earth off it's axis. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
18729
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 11:59:00 -
[93] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:If they made PvE gameplay something people actually have to think about, the howling from the PvE players would throw the earth off it's axis. Their tears would raise sea levels more than climate change is supposed to.
Eve is an introduction to teamwork, paranoia, dealing with consequences, coping with loss, economics, long term planning, bartering, astronomy, and the theory of space submarine travel.
Nil mortifi sine lucre |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5251
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:15:00 -
[94] - Quote
Ahost Gceo wrote: There was quality to the posting here to begin with? It's either been people sympathizing with the OP or people simplying exercising a Neanderthal mindset and insisting that EVE is fine the way it is while making fun of his less than concise thought processes, "everyone +1 my comment because I'm like so super edgy and hardcore and you're so super stupid lol."
Don't hold back, man, tell us how you feel "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |
|

CCP Falcon
7475

|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:31:00 -
[95] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:the future of eve
Take a look here.

CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Manager -á || -á EVE Illuminati
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Spectral Tiger
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:36:00 -
[96] - Quote
Well EVE is a niche game and the future of EVE is to remain a niche game. The question being is how many leave compared with how many start and stay.
There was another thread about player retention suggesting the majority of new players leave within the first 2 months. How true that is I can't say as I've not seen any figures for it. But I can understand why that maybe the case, essentially they get bored due to being limited to what they can actually do in-game with the limited trained skills they have. Of course there are people that like the long skill tree and the fact it takes months/years to actually be able to do something that you want to do. Although I think that would be a minority of MMO players.
EVE is a sandbox and being a sandbox you have to set your own goals, if you don't then you have no real direction leading to boredom, ship spinning, logging in to change skills and ultimately leaving the game. Throwing new content into the mix will not change that, well at least not for long.
Not everyone wants to play alts and how often do we hear people saying they need alts to raise the capital in order for them to be able to PvP. Now there's a good reason for some players to not want to PvP because quite frankly they perceive it as something that they can't afford to do. If you want more people to PvP then it needs to be affordable without the need for alts.
New content or bug fixing/balancing? I'd say both are equally important, although with new content it needs to be well thought out and not just something to try and keep people. Content like new ships are good especially as some of the old ones were not great designs, but a lot of those will be unplayable to new people for sometime to come. Personally I actually like some of the newer designs. As for bugs and rebalances (if game breaking) that's something that should be done as the corrective action is developed and not leave it to add as part of an expansion.
I could go on but I'll just finish pretty much as I started.
EVE is a niche game and unless the game design is going to change drastically and upset the niche market it has then it'll always be a niche game. So the future is probably a slightly lower population as more MMOs are released, but I don't think there's any easy answer and probably why CCP doesn't want to rock the boat too much.
Edit: Hmm, a dev post has been added, I better take a look. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6707
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 12:59:00 -
[97] - Quote
kirean3464 wrote:
Anyone mining has to choices either hope the nice low or null sec guys wont charge you to much or shoot you or keep hoping 6 dudes in catalysts dont show up to show you why carebearing is bad. Miners need some serious buffing
I haven't read most of this thread or the OP for that matter , mainly because the above quoted nonsense stopped me cold lol.
Back when CCP buffed mining ships i told them what I thought would happen and that it would mirror getting a pay raise in real life.
Years ago, my job paid the worst wages of any other organization of it's kind in you county. My co-workers (and to be honest , I was right there with them) agitated for a long overdue pay increase. It finally happened and everyone was happy.
One co-worker who'd been with us less than a year told me that he thought the raise would lead to less bitching and moaning and more professionalism. it was so naive it was sweet lol.
So i told him what will really happen: We'll get a raise, but the people who are always unhappy will return to being unhappy in a month or two. Mainly because they are unhappy people to begin with, but also because it's not INCOME lvl that causes financial unhappiness, it's spending habits. In 2 months the unhappy people who are happy at the raise will find that their bad spending habits have caught up to them, will feel like nothing has changed for them, and go right back to bitching.
Meanwhile the people who could already manage their money (you know, the guys who don't even realize it's payday) won't even notice a change other than their monthly bank statement showing more money going into savings.
As IRL, so it is in game. The miners were happy for a quick second because they let themselves believe that CCP cared about them and wanted to protect them from the gankers lol. They thought the exhumer buffs would stop ganking. What really happened is that the miners who were flying and fitting smart to begin with (and never got ganked to begin with) continued to not get ganked (and thus didn't complain) while the greedy and lazy 'max yeild crowd' kept flying stupid (or afk), and still got ganked like before only by a few more catalysts.
It didn't take long for the bad miners to go right back to asking for more buffs/more nerfs to gankers just like they always had. people are people, in game or out. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1572
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:05:00 -
[98] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something. go and do your own reaserch Spell research properly before attempting to come across as intellectually superior. If you'd read what I wrote, like, actually read it, I said, in no uncertain terms, what you said - the outrage was about the addition of a new but unfinished feature at the expense of fixes to existing broken or unfinished features. Don't tell me to do my own "reaserch" [sic] if you can't even read. As an addendum, doing your own research is pointless without proper analysis. Your vexatious delivery of this 'instruction' parallels similar deliveries by various deniers across the face of the planet - vaccine deniers, heliocentricity deniers, old earth deniers, and science deniers in general - complete with flying spittle and all. In my experience, telling people to "do their own research" amounts to " don't make me do stuff" - you either don't have, or are too lazy to find, the 'research' that you're telling me to do. Every time someone says it to me, I know I'm talking to someone who wouldn't qualify as a halfwit with twice the brainpower they have, let alone someone who even knows what research actually is.
I see a lot of words here but fail to see your point. You disregarded the entire sentiment of quinns post and instead criticized his spelling... Do you really think that helps your argument?
Nobody is saying that fixes do don't improve the game but some people feel fixes without any real content makes for a boring game. I you feet otherwise, please explain your views more clearly instead of talking nonsense and insulting people. +1 |

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
834
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:07:00 -
[99] - Quote
incursions need removing really... besides the ridicilous storyline .. they have been getting slaughtered for years now.... but the easy money part . .. the exploitation by alts from nullsec .... it detracts from having too work for your isk.. Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5252
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:09:00 -
[100] - Quote
Given how I have personally introduced five new players (and more than that in accounts) in the last 9 months and none have left, I don't know what the OP is doing wrong if he's seeing people leave
Oh wait I do
Its the defeatest attitude of people who are never satisfied
Mining ships are the buffed they've ever been and indy is getting a massive buff soon
Tech 1 ships as a whole (you know, apparently for "new players") got a huge boost recently to keep them competitive against highly specialised T2 variants
What more do you want?
"If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Remiel Pollard
The 0th Fleet A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
3423
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:10:00 -
[101] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quinn Corvez wrote:
All of our subscription money shouldn't be going towards fixing broken stuff, as that is what CCP should be doing as part of their quality control system.
It's the same with you. You're leaving out the massive backlash over Incarna, followed by the massive player return that occurred when CCP started fixing stuff. You're also leaving out the small, annoying little factoid that subs are still rising. They could be new players, or they could be old ones creating alts - either way, someone likes the game enough to throw more money at it. When you've explained that little anomalous gap in your research, then maybe you'll be on to something. go and do your own reaserch Spell research properly before attempting to come across as intellectually superior. If you'd read what I wrote, like, actually read it, I said, in no uncertain terms, what you said - the outrage was about the addition of a new but unfinished feature at the expense of fixes to existing broken or unfinished features. Don't tell me to do my own "reaserch" [sic] if you can't even read. As an addendum, doing your own research is pointless without proper analysis. Your vexatious delivery of this 'instruction' parallels similar deliveries by various deniers across the face of the planet - vaccine deniers, heliocentricity deniers, old earth deniers, and science deniers in general - complete with flying spittle and all. In my experience, telling people to "do their own research" amounts to " don't make me do stuff" - you either don't have, or are too lazy to find, the 'research' that you're telling me to do. Every time someone says it to me, I know I'm talking to someone who wouldn't qualify as a halfwit with twice the brainpower they have, let alone someone who even knows what research actually is. I see a lot of words here but fail to see your point. You disregarded the entire sentiment of quinns post and instead criticized his spelling... Do you really think that helps your argument? Nobody is saying that fixes do don't improve the game but some people feel fixes without any real content makes for a boring game. I you feet otherwise, please explain your views more clearly instead of talking nonsense and insulting people.
Are you on crack? I didn't disregard any 'sentiment', I told him to try reading before telling me to 'do my research'. He just tried to lecture me on stuff I'd ALREADY SAID in the very post he was responding to. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
[email protected] |

Prince Kobol
1945
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:14:00 -
[102] - Quote
Yeah..
Future of Eve
Oops My Bad
  |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6983
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:15:00 -
[103] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:17:00 -
[104] - Quote
And don't forget this cool stuff: COOL STUFF
Where is all that content huh CCP? 
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one.
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting. +1 |

Spectral Tiger
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:21:00 -
[105] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one.
So what's this theme park content you are talking about? Can you give us some examples? |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5252
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:22:00 -
[106] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
So..
Let me get this right
After a barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant
You cherry pick one thing that wouldn't have actually added anything to the game for at least months if not years?
If at all?
Stop trying to derail this into another boring WiS argument "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6983
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:22:00 -
[107] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Where is all that content huh CCP? 
That particular content has been left to die in obscurity where it belongs.
Good riddance.
Quote: So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
And you want more of that? More failed delivery, borked concepts that have to be fixed over years, or quietly swept into a corner and ignored?
You actually want more of that kind of thing? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Matilda Cecilia Fock
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
99
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:32:00 -
[108] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:And don't forget this cool stuff: COOL STUFFWhere is all that content huh CCP?  (...)
Apparently it is so dead that you can't open threads about it, else they are deedem "redundant" and closed.  Q: So many well known dev's left lately, should we be worried? A: (Jester): Nope. (...) Worry a lot if Fozzie, Masterplan, Rise, Veritas, Bettik, Ytterbium, Scarpia, Arrow, or even Greyscale leaves. Worry a little if Punkturis, karkur, SoniClover, Affinity, Goliath, or Xhagen leaves.
|

Higgs Foton
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
144
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:36:00 -
[109] - Quote
I have been to two fanfests myself, and there was stuff introduced (Ring mining! Walking in stations! Expandable POS! Player built gates!) which i have yet to see come to fruition. My conclusion is that CCP is just calling the results of their brainstorm sessions at fanfest to have some content, without really planning to do something of substance with it.. So i do not really believe what has been said in those movies. I find the implementation of "new stuff" a tad on the slowish side. We need more psssshhhhh. *Snip* Removed trolling part of the post. ISD Ezwal.*Snip* *Snip*-áPlease refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.*Snip* *Snip*-áRemoved part of the post for not having enough pssssshhhhhh. ISD Ezwal.-á*Snip* |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6712
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:38:00 -
[110] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote: What more do you want?
They want more themepark content. And they are trying to use the "new player experience" line as a smokescreen to ask for it, the same reason people say "It's for the children" in real life, to make an unreasonable request sound like a reasonable one.
Samuel L. Jackson voice
Think of the mother ******* children, mother ******
/Samuel L. Jackson voice

|

Colonel Jim Irwin
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:39:00 -
[111] - Quote
I bougth a playstation 4 :D |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6712
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:41:00 -
[112] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
If you believe what you see at fanfest, well that means you're the right guy to take a look at some seafront property I'm selling for cheap in Colorado.
|

Tricia Killnu
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:44:00 -
[113] - Quote
Just undock and blow up ships
Its pretty satisfying. . . Sometimes you just have to realized you undocked and you suck. . . |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:49:00 -
[114] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Rek Seven wrote:
So it's the players that promise the world at fanfest and fail to deliver... Interesting.
So.. Let me get this right After a barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant You cherry pick one thing that wouldn't have actually added anything to the game for at least months if not years? If at all? Stop trying to derail this into another boring WiS argument How about answering any of the points raised about how subs are not haemorraghing and indy and mining is stronger and more popular than its ever been and is getting even more buffs?
The only people ranting are the people on your side of the fence mate. I already stated why I feel the way do and I attempted to justify my claims. Perhaps you missed it so i'll post it again for you:
Rek Seven wrote:For those of you that believe fixes alone are the answer to all the problems, please take a look at the following information. Server numbers are steadily declining and they are almost as low as they were during the summer of rage. The highest they have ever been was between the incursion and incarna releases, so make of that what you will... http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility. 
Now as for the " barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant" i have honestly missed anything that disproves anything i say.
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
Once again, I like the fact that CCP are fixing parts of the game but that doesn't stop me from wanting new content to give me something new to do. +1 |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5252
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:52:00 -
[115] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
Now as for the " barrage of things that disprove your "nothing is planned, EvE is dying" rant" i have honestly missed anything that disproves anything i say.
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
They do both
And you are choosing to ignore anything that doesn't fit your point of view
You are unhappy
Maybe you should go, have a sit down, and think why a video game makes you so unhappy "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6715
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:56:00 -
[116] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
Once again, I like the fact that CCP are fixing parts of the game but that doesn't stop me from wanting new content to give me something new to do.
If you need ccp to add new content to give you new things to do, you're playing the wrong game. 7 years I've played and I'm still finding new things to do, even more so now that CCP is making old useless things new .
I now know for a fact that an Impel can tank the citadel torp from a 10/10 while deploying a jet can of cap boosters (toi keep my dual XLASB machariel dps ship from running out of them while It kills the overseer) NO LOGISTICS SHIP REQUIRED. But the only reason I know that now is because I'm a sandbox PVE player playing a sandbox MMO thus i make my own damn 'content'.
|

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:15:00 -
[117] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Rek Seven wrote:
If you have evidence to prove that fixing broken parts of the game results in more subscriptions and a better game than adding new content, i would be glad to hear it and debate it with you.
Once again, I like the fact that CCP are fixing parts of the game but that doesn't stop me from wanting new content to give me something new to do.
If you need ccp to add new content to give you new things to do, you're playing the wrong game. 7 years I've played and I'm still finding new things to do, even more so now that CCP is making old useless things new . I now know for a fact that an Impel can tank the citadel torp from a 10/10 while deploying a jet can of cap boosters (toi keep my dual XLASB machariel dps ship from running out of them while It kills the overseer) NO LOGISTICS SHIP REQUIRED. But the only reason I know that now is because I'm a sandbox PVE player playing a sandbox MMO thus i make my own damn 'content'.
I agree, and i'm starting to realise the game isn't for me. I play it because i love sci fi and the concept of eve sounded cool but now that i have experienced everything that interests me in EVE, it's become boring. I actually canceled my sub last week so i can take a break for the first time in four years (no, you can't have my stuff) but hopefully i'll have a reason to come back someday.
I don't know why we are all arguing tbh. I can accept that you guys are happy with the game but why can't you accept that other people derive fun from different things that you? For example, EVE pve is mundane and tedious to me to no matter how clever it made me feel that i could use industrial ships to do 10/10 sites, i would never consider it fun new content. +1 |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5255
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:19:00 -
[118] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
I don't know why we are all arguing. I can accept that you guys are happy with the game but why can't you accept that other people derive fun from different things that you?
We can
Its when you get abusive to people that dont understand why you are so unhappy with this game that leads to conflict.
If you dont like this game the way it is, why should the rest of us accept your proposed changes when the net result of that in our opinion would make us unhappy?
What is it about EvE that makes people play, but when they find they dont like it, rather than change to a game they do enjoy, they lobby to have the game itself changed?
That, my dear Doctor, is the nub of the conflict in this kind of thread.
But what do I know? Im just a simple Cardassian tailor "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6987
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:22:00 -
[119] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: That, my dear Doctor, is the nub of the conflict in this kind of thread.
But what do I know? Im just a simple Cardassian tailor
Goddamit. Have a like. A very begrudging like. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:24:00 -
[120] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: Its when you get abusive to people that dont understand why you are so unhappy with this game that leads to conflict.
If you dont like this game the way it is, why should the rest of us accept your proposed changes when the net result of that in our opinion would make us unhappy?
What is it about EvE that makes people play, but when they find they dont like it, rather than change to a game they do enjoy, they lobby to have the game itself changed?
When was i abusive? What changes did i propose that would result in you being unhappy? If new content makes you unhappy does that mean you are against the "new space" ccp has planned? 
I can't speak for everyone but the investment I've put into training my character and the social connections i've made in the game makes me want to stick around inspite of the games faults. +1 |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5256
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:43:00 -
[121] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:When was i abusive? What changes did i propose that would result in you being unhappy? If new content makes you unhappy does that mean you are against the "new space" ccp has planned?  I can't speak for everyone but the investment I've put into training my character and the social connections i've made in the game makes me want to stick around inspite of the games faults.
*sigh* Its like talking to my mother
Lets handle this in order
1) Im not going to point out where you have basically gone out of your way to call people who disagree with you liars, but I sincerly wish that you could have some manners.
2) Where did I say new content makes me unhappy. I was specifically talking about instances where changes were demanded that would directly impact the nature of the game. If you owuld like to propose new content that would not do this, I am sure we would be happy to discuss these with you rationally
3) What investment? What do you think you are investing? Time? Money? Isk? This is a well beaten horse. As skills trian themselves, you have invested no time. Setting your skill queue does not prevent you from doing anything. Money? you pay for server access and access to the game engine. Skills are part of that, but what return on a monetary investment are you expecting? Isk? Skills are dirt cheap, so I dont know what you mean here either.
4) Sticking around? So thats why you unsubbed, right? "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:00:00 -
[122] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
1) I'm not going to point out where you have basically gone out of your way to call people who disagree with you liars, but I sincerely wish that you could have some manners.
You can't point it out because it didn't happen, and claiming otherwise does infact make you a liar. I have backed up everything i said with facts, while you ignor that and continue to put forward basless arguments and then have the nerve to say i'm the one derailing thwe thread... Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk guess that was on topic to huh?
Ramona McCandless wrote:
2) Where did I say new content makes me unhappy. I was specifically talking about instances where changes were demanded that would directly impact the nature of the game. If you would like to propose new content that would not do this, I am sure we would be happy to discuss these with you rationally
Like five minutes ago... 
Ramona McCandless wrote: why should the rest of us accept your proposed changes when the net result of that in our opinion would make us unhappy?
Speaking to you is like trying to have a conversation with Hodor  +1 |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6717
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:01:00 -
[123] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
I agree, and i'm starting to realise the game isn't for me. I play it because i love sci fi and the concept of eve sounded cool but now that i have experienced everything that interests me in EVE, it's become boring. I actually canceled my sub last week so i can take a break for the first time in four years (no, you can't have my stuff) but hopefully i'll have a reason to come back someday.
Look at the bolded part.
Imagine the a woman said to you "I married you not because I loved YOU, but because i loved the idea of getting married and all my friends were doing it".
You made a mistake, you chose to play a game not because of that game, but because of your affinity for the game's general setting. Then, when you found out that you don't actually like the game (it seems to me you'd be much happier in a themepark type game where the developers deliver content, like how the Star Trek Online DEVs produce 'episodes' for their game all the time) you chose to stay and ask for changes that actual EVE fans wouldn't like rather than taking it upon yourself to go find the right game for you.
That's why these conflicts always arise on these forums (and all game forums too). Hell, in real life too. I went to college with a guy who could quote Das Kapital verbatim and who can speak Spanish, but rather than move to Cuba and be happy he thinks some revolution no one but him wants should happen where we were lol.
Want to know what's really funny about old boy from college though? Today he's an investment banker.......ie he learned to love that which he proffessed to hate. Your realistic options are learn to love EVE as it is, or find something else that you enjoy.
Quote: I don't know why we are all arguing tbh. I can accept that you guys are happy with the game but why can't you accept that other people derive fun from different things that you? For example, EVE pve is mundane and tedious to me to no matter how clever it made me feel that i could use industrial ships to do 10/10 sites, i would never consider it fun new content.
Like Ramona said, we can accept that some people don't like the game. What is unacceptable is the idea that the game needs to change (or in the words of the unhappy people, "expand") to make the people who don't like it happy (which would screw over those of us who DO like it). We found a game we like and we don't think it's too much to expect others to do the same. Most people actually do which is why so many people quit EVE during the trial period.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5260
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:04:00 -
[124] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:You can't point it out because it didn't happen, and claiming otherwise does infact make you a liar. I have backed up everything i said with facts, while you ignor that and continue to put forward basless arguments and then have the nerve to say i'm the one derailing thwe thread... Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk guess that was on topic to huh?
You... just did what I said you had done... to prove that you didnt? Uh ok.
And you are the first person to mention derailing.
And its not my fault if you don't get the joke. Polan IS stronk.
Rek Seven
Ramona McCandless wrote:
2) Where did I say new content makes me unhappy.
Like five minutes ago... [:| wrote: Quote please
Rek Seven wrote:Speaking to you is like trying to have a conversation with Hodor 
I dont know what that is, sorry, but I assume you are being insulting. AGAIN
"If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2239
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:05:00 -
[125] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote: I don't know why we are all arguing tbh. I can accept that you guys are happy with the game but why can't you accept that other people derive fun from different things that you?
Hypocrite. GTFO! The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Spectral Tiger
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:07:00 -
[126] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
1) I'm not going to point out where you have basically gone out of your way to call people who disagree with you liars, but I sincerely wish that you could have some manners.
You can't point it out because it didn't happen, and claiming otherwise does infact make you a liar. I have backed up everything i said with facts, while you ignor that and continue to put forward basless arguments and then have the nerve to say i'm the one derailing thwe thread... Ramona McCandless wrote:Polish are stronk guess that was on topic to huh? Ramona McCandless wrote:
2) Where did I say new content makes me unhappy. I was specifically talking about instances where changes were demanded that would directly impact the nature of the game. If you would like to propose new content that would not do this, I am sure we would be happy to discuss these with you rationally
Like five minutes ago...  Ramona McCandless wrote: why should the rest of us accept your proposed changes when the net result of that in our opinion would make us unhappy?
Speaking to you is like trying to have a conversation with Hodor 
What's this got to do with the thread? Just seems that it's turned into an argument between two people. You talk about derailing the thread, well to get it back on track one of you will have to stop first. As I doubt you'll ever agree. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6718
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:07:00 -
[127] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:When was i abusive? What changes did i propose that would result in you being unhappy? If new content makes you unhappy does that mean you are against the "new space" ccp has planned? 
New space isn't so much 'content' as 'more sand'.
And Ramona is speaking in General terms. none of us are for GOOD, appropriate, EVE-like growth (ie more sand box, more sand box tools ect). But all change isn't good change and what most of you dissatisfied "I need new content" types are asking for are things that go against what makes EVE great for those of us suited for a game like EVE.
Quote: I can't speak for everyone but the investment I've put into training my character and the social connections i've made in the game makes me want to stick around inspite of the games faults.
That's the same as saying "well, i don't like my wife, but we have kids, a mortgage, and if I leave she gets half my stuff including my future pension , so I'll stay and be miserable".
It's nonsense thinking. if you don't like what EVE is at it's core (a light on content social sandbox), continuing to play is an act of masochism.
|

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2241
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:09:00 -
[128] - Quote
This guy is a hypocrite. You're wasting energy on him.
Just bomb him out of space! The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Cowards deserve punishment -
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5261
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:10:00 -
[129] - Quote
Spectral Tiger wrote: What's this got to do with the thread? Just seems that it's turned into an argument between two people. You talk about derailing the thread, well to get it back on track one of you will have to stop first. As I doubt you'll ever agree.
Accepted. And I apologise for digressing
My point is, that the game is not stagnating. Between code being fixed, and new content added by Devs and players, the game has even more possibilities than ever before.
I agree there are issues, no game is perfect, but why uproot the moneytree just as it starts blossoming again simply because its not a juniper bush? "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Prince Kobol
1945
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:13:00 -
[130] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
Like Ramona said, we can accept that some people don't like the game. What is unacceptable is the idea that the game needs to change (or in the words of the unhappy people, "expand") to make the people who don't like it happy (which would screw over those of us who DO like it). We found a game we like and we don't think it's too much to expect others to do the same. Most people actually do which is why so many people quit EVE during the trial period.
Thing is, parts of the game do need to change.
Sov Mechanics - A fundamental part of game that requires a completely rethink. Tweaking it simply will not do.
Faction Warfare - Whilst it is better then it was, it is far from perfect. FW has become for the most part not an place to find small scale PvP but to farm easy isk.
PoS's - Do we really need to go here?
PvE - I actually couldn't care less about PvE in Eve. All PvE sucks ass and that will never change. I will let other people argue about how bad PvE as they will care more then me.
I currently do not like some of the most important aspects of the game and want to see them changed (pretty sure a lot of people want to see Sov changed and FW to a degree) so are we all wrong? |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
1573
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:15:00 -
[131] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote: And you are the first person to mention derailing.
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Stop trying to derail this...
Dude I think you should see someone about that memory loss 
Anyway, i'll agree to stop the pointless arguing if you do.
So in the interest of having a civil debate do you have evidence (e.g. server stats) to backup this statement:
Ramona McCandless wrote: My point is, that the game is not stagnating. Between code being fixed, and new content added by Devs and players, the game has even more possibilities than ever before.
Stagnating definition: cease developing; become inactive or dull. +1 |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6720
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:16:00 -
[132] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Spectral Tiger wrote: What's this got to do with the thread? Just seems that it's turned into an argument between two people. You talk about derailing the thread, well to get it back on track one of you will have to stop first. As I doubt you'll ever agree.
Accepted. And I apologise for digressing My point is, that the game is not stagnating. Between code being fixed, and new content added by Devs and players, the game has even more possibilities than ever before. I agree there are issues, no game is perfect, but why uproot the moneytree just as it starts blossoming again simply because its not a juniper bush?
Tiercide by itself has done more for the game IMO than any number of 'content rich' expansions. My old allaince is flying CARACAL fleets as a serious doctrine lol.
The issue this 'derailment' is about is that some people think the 'problem' is external (ie the game is stagnating') rather than understanding that it's really 'internal' (they are bored with EVE, the fact of which illustrates they aren't the kind of sandbox player EVE caters to).
This game is sooo much better than it was in 2007 when I started. it's way more noob friendly, way more 'accessible', it's way easier to not get lost in all of it, its way WAY easier to get into good pvp (RvB, faction warfare, brave newbies, EVE uni ect ect_) AND way easier to make isk (incursions, upgradeable null space, valuable easy to kill low sec belt rats, faction war missions doable in freaking stealth bombers).
Despite all that the same people who were unhappy in 2007 (if they played) are unhappy now. That simply means that some people will be unhappy no matter what direction EVE takes.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5261
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:16:00 -
[133] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:
I currently do not like some of the most important aspects of the game and want to see them changed (pretty sure a lot of people want to see Sov changed and FW to a degree) so are we all wrong?
No, you just have a different point of view on some things
Some of those points I agree with 100%
Some are (allegedly) going to be improved or fixed in the near future
and some, (such as Sov) I reserve the right to disagree with because I happen to have a different perspective on the matter
Its all cool.
"If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Prince Kobol
1945
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:17:00 -
[134] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Spectral Tiger wrote: What's this got to do with the thread? Just seems that it's turned into an argument between two people. You talk about derailing the thread, well to get it back on track one of you will have to stop first. As I doubt you'll ever agree.
Accepted. And I apologise for digressing My point is, that the game is not stagnating. Between code being fixed, and new content added by Devs and players, the game has even more possibilities than ever before. I agree there are issues, no game is perfect, but why uproot the moneytree just as it starts blossoming again simply because its not a juniper bush?
Yes but is the game blossoming. The PCU count would indicate otherwise and it will most likely only get worse as the summer kicks in and people play less to enjoy their holidays and good weather.
I love some of things that have changed over the last 18 months, most of it was badly needed, however CCP have gone from one extreme.. half finished new content to the other, no new content and all bug fixes and balancing.
They now to need to find a nice middle ground between introducing new content and continuing with the work they have been doing over the last 18 months or so.
For years CCP have promised the many things but delivered on very few, its now getting to the point for me and maybe for others where CCP now have start delivering on the things they say. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
5261
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:23:00 -
[135] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:
Yes but is the game blossoming. The PCU count would indicate otherwise and it will most likely only get worse as the summer kicks in and people play less to enjoy their holidays and good weather.
Again, I accept that people can read the tealeaves differently, thats the perogative of people who use a discussion thread after all :)
But given the recent updates, Im just not sure how the signs point to bad.
Wasn't the game perfectly enjoyable (enought to sub to) when there were less people playing 3, 4 or 5 years ago?
The game is a slow burner, and I accept that there will always be doomsayers (hell, if everyone was partying over how awesome it was Id be the FIRST to complain lol), but compared to a year ago, I feel much more optimistic about the content of the game and how its currently progressing.
I dont mind meeting back here in a year and admitting I was wrong if it truns out you, me, sol, jenn and james315 are the only remaing inhabitants lol "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. "Question asked, insults exchanged, solutions given, face palms had, problem solved, off topic posts posted, thread locked." - ISD Ezwal |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
6721
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:48:00 -
[136] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
Like Ramona said, we can accept that some people don't like the game. What is unacceptable is the idea that the game needs to change (or in the words of the unhappy people, "expand") to make the people who don't like it happy (which would screw over those of us who DO like it). We found a game we like and we don't think it's too much to expect others to do the same. Most people actually do which is why so many people quit EVE during the trial period.
Thing is, parts of the game do need to change. Sov Mechanics - A fundamental part of game that requires a completely rethink. Tweaking it simply will not do. Faction Warfare - Whilst it is better then it was, it is far from perfect. FW has become for the most part not an place to find small scale PvP but to farm easy isk. PoS's - Do we really need to go here? PvE - I actually couldn't care less about PvE in Eve. All PvE sucks ass and that will never change. I will let other people argue about how bad PvE as they will care more then me. I currently do not like some of the most important aspects of the game and want to see them changed (pretty sure a lot of people want to see Sov changed and FW to a degree) so are we all wrong?
No one said things can't get better. If you read the part of that post you didn't quote you'll see that.
But except for SOV (which is WAY better than that POS grinding nightmare it used to be), none of those things are core aspects of EVE (not even pve, with is more 'backdrop' than anything else). I'm talking about people who don't like the CORE of EVE (sandbox with light developer provided content) |

Prince Kobol
1945
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:49:00 -
[137] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:
Yes but is the game blossoming. The PCU count would indicate otherwise and it will most likely only get worse as the summer kicks in and people play less to enjoy their holidays and good weather.
Again, I accept that people can read the tealeaves differently, thats the perogative of people who use a discussion thread after all :) But given the recent updates, Im just not sure how the signs point to bad. Wasn't the game perfectly enjoyable (enought to sub to) when there were less people playing 3, 4 or 5 years ago? The game is a slow burner, and I accept that there will always be doomsayers (hell, if everyone was partying over how awesome it was Id be the FIRST to complain lol), but compared to a year ago, I feel much more optimistic about the content of the game and how its currently progressing. I dont mind meeting back here in a year and admitting I was wrong if it truns out you, me, sol, jenn and james315 are the only remaing inhabitants lol
For me it is not so much the recent updates, its more the guys who left before the lay off's, those who were laid off, the fact they are still working on 4 projects - Eve, Legion, Valkyrie, Dust but with now a lot less staff.
I guess it was when Jon Lander left when I started to feel that Eve might be in trouble. Here was guy who was instrumental in saving Eve and CCP Ass, then he was moved to the mobile games division which as far as I am aware nothing has ever come from that department and then he leaves. It was like, wtf is going on over there.
Whilst I might have faith in the devs that are still there, I have no faith at all in CCP Top Level Management. They still seem to be having delusions of grandeur.
Sure develop another game other then Eve, but not so many and all at once, your not Blizzard or EA. You do not have the resources to develop that many games at the same time and this has already been show with both WoD and Dust. |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
3103

|
Posted - 2014.06.12 16:44:00 -
[138] - Quote
After a review of the thread, especially the later parts of it, I have determined most of the posts have gone off topic. As such, I'll be leaving it closed.
Thank you. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |