Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1386
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Its made no difference to fw, its only hindered what people can do.
logisticly its a nightmare and the only kills from it are lol kills when a guy warps to dock and its not a system he owns. Not the huge fight and logistical effort i assume ccp envisaged when they came up with this brilliant plan.
Some people play in low sec because its accessible, they dont have X hours to commit to a roam like 0.0 being able to dock was one of the good things about fw before the change, door bells ring, babies cry, shizz happens. make fw more available again.
yeah i know its a whiny post, but serious did any good come of the change apart from sheer inconvenience? Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
2277
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
It makes every difference in FW - in my theater. |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
2669
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
docking rights are the only reason why i am in FW. Its also the only aspect what brings meaning to sov. eve style bounties (done) dust boarding parties imagine there is war and everybody cloaks - join FW |

Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
219
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alright honey show me on the solar system doll where the ihub was bashed? |

Nick Starkey
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
57
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 13:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Docking rights make no real difference tbh. Anything stuck inside flipped stations can be contracted to neutral alts and taken away. It is only a very small incovenience with little practical implications. .. |

Thanatos Marathon
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
217
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nick Starkey wrote:Docking rights make no real difference tbh. Anything stuck inside flipped stations can be contracted to neutral alts and taken away. It is only a very small incovenience with little practical implications.
Yeah, you know, unless you want to control the system and not go through the hell of living out of a POS. BLFOX is currently recruiting |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1299
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nick Starkey wrote:Docking rights make no real difference tbh. Anything stuck inside flipped stations can be contracted to neutral alts and taken away. It is only a very small incovenience with little practical implications.
This except I would say its a bigger inconvenience.
Docking rights add an inconvenience to participating in fw. That is all it is.
You want to pvp? Well you have to travel several jumps to get to then enemy and several more back if you need to reship or even repair.
You want to base in a fw system? You have to get an alt account to sit in an empty frigate (save the stabs) and dplex..
Plus this:
ShahFluffers wrote:
Personally? I would just like to see docking restrictions lifted. Yes, from a lore/RP point-of-view it makes sense. Yes, it also does make some groups work together more closely than they would like. But it also prevents people from spreading out within the warzone because no one group can stay online all the time to keep their system from being farmed to vulnerable and captured. This in turn creates "bunker" systems that are nigh impregnable while everything else remains more or less undefended... or groups live just outside the warzone to avoid the lockouts altogether... or people just leave FW and become full pirates because well, having where you can and cannot dock because some people did more PvE than you leaves a bad taste in your mouth and is not the reason you joined the militia in the first place.
It is like 0.0 SOV being decided by how much ratting, anomalies, and mining your alliance does over the others... with ship on ship combat being completely unnecessary or even being discouraged (because you are not ratting, running anomalies, or mining to keep SOV).
Really I still don't see how it makes sense that my own militia won't let me dock in its stations, but whatever. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
well if you wanted to pvp you could just pirate everyone anyway, its not like nuets are locked out of plexes.
pvping in fw is suffering and this is one of the things thats putting people off. Yeah i know station games happen but not even every station every day all the time etc. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
277
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:28:00 -
[9] - Quote
Nick Starkey wrote:Docking rights make no real difference tbh. Anything stuck inside flipped stations can be contracted to neutral alts and taken away. It is only a very small incovenience with little practical implications. Aside from, you know, staging systems and chokepoint systems and mission systems...
Losing docking rights has a huge impact on how things in the warzone flow. Keep it. |

Charlie Firpol
Noob Mercs Monkeys with Guns.
231
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Definately keep it. We have finally some kind of a frontline in FW now. Sure, if you lose your staging system your stuff isn-¦t lost as you can contract it to an alt and get it back but you ost your staging system! You have to stage from somewhere else!
That IS a big deal. Keep it. |

Andre Vauban
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
285
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 14:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Its made no difference to fw, its only hindered what people can do.
logisticly its a nightmare and the only kills from it are lol kills when a guy warps to dock and its not a system he owns. Not the huge fight and logistical effort i assume ccp envisaged when they came up with this brilliant plan.
Some people play in low sec because its accessible, they dont have X hours to commit to a roam like 0.0 being able to dock was one of the good things about fw before the change, door bells ring, babies cry, shizz happens. make fw more available again.
yeah i know its a whiny post, but serious did any good come of the change apart from sheer inconvenience?
It is a huge conflict driver and is the main reason people fight tooth and nail over plexes. Without it, there is no reason to take a fight in a plex that you wouldn't otherwise take. Unlike 0.0, if you get locked out of station it is trivial to get your assets out.
QCATS is recruiting:-á https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3896299 |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:00:00 -
[12] - Quote
Alts and black frog can move anything anyway, its simply inconvenience hindering battles and plexing not making it more diverse.
Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
409
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
muad dib for the first time in since ever has been hard core plexing like some of us have been for years and doesnt like it. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
277
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Alts and black frog can move anything anyway, its simply inconvenience hindering battles and plexing not making it more diverse. As with many FW issues, you folks on the Amarr / Minmatar front have a different view than us on the Gal/Cal front. In short, you're doing it wrong, and should feel bad.
|

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote:muad dib for the first time in since ever has been hard core plexing like some of us have been for years and doesnt like it. OI
I defensive plex not like you wallet lining offensive farming stabbed winged monkeys do for the cash!
u disgust me! Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
409
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:muad dib for the first time in since ever has been hard core plexing like some of us have been for years and doesnt like it. OI I defensive plex not like you wallet lining offensive farming stabbed winged monkeys do for the cash! u disgust me! http://i.imgur.com/0ifUHQy.jpg |

Stalking Mantis
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
498
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:27:00 -
[17] - Quote
We are hardcore stabbed alt plexers. No really we are.
Ask Ushra Khan, they will confirm it.
Ask Iron Oxide, they will confirm it
Ask TRIAD, they will confirm it
Ask Biohazard, They will confirm it
Proud Member of 'The HotPocket' Crew. What It's Like in Militia Chat http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzYm3ig7tak |

Templar Dane
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
236
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Its made no difference to fw, its only hindered what people can do.
logisticly its a nightmare and the only kills from it are lol kills when a guy warps to dock and its not a system he owns. Not the huge fight and logistical effort i assume ccp envisaged when they came up with this brilliant plan.
Some people play in low sec because its accessible, they dont have X hours to commit to a roam like 0.0 being able to dock was one of the good things about fw before the change, door bells ring, babies cry, shizz happens. make fw more available again.
yeah i know its a whiny post, but serious did any good come of the change apart from sheer inconvenience?
I guess you've never camped a station the morning after flipping a home system.
Good times.
|

Radric Davids
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
54
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 15:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
Part of the point of the docking mechanic is so that if the opposing militia come to camp you into a station in your militia's system, they can't dock up and you can.. it adds some safety to your systems, and also a small advantage to taking fights in your systems |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate
395
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 18:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sounds like someone bought something in a system without first checking who held sov there. |

Nick Starkey
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
58
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 20:48:00 -
[21] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:Nick Starkey wrote:Docking rights make no real difference tbh. Anything stuck inside flipped stations can be contracted to neutral alts and taken away. It is only a very small incovenience with little practical implications. Aside from, you know, staging systems and chokepoint systems and mission systems... Losing docking rights has a huge impact on how things in the warzone flow. Keep it.
I forgot about agents. However, the other 2 things are hardly a factor. A staging system can be just about anywhere else with a repair station and having to travel 1-3 extra jumps somewhere isn't a deal breaker as long as they're within JF/carrier range.
Most homesystems are defended for the sake of fightning, not because they are particulary valuable to anyone. .. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
279
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 21:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
Nick Starkey wrote:Veskrashen wrote:Nick Starkey wrote:Docking rights make no real difference tbh. Anything stuck inside flipped stations can be contracted to neutral alts and taken away. It is only a very small incovenience with little practical implications. Aside from, you know, staging systems and chokepoint systems and mission systems... Losing docking rights has a huge impact on how things in the warzone flow. Keep it. I forgot about agents. However, the other 2 things are hardly a factor. A staging system can be just about anywhere else with a repair station and having to travel 1-3 extra jumps somewhere isn't a deal breaker as long as they're within JF/carrier range. Most homesystems are defended for the sake of fightning, not because they are particulary valuable to anyone. You would think you would have learned something from Eha.... |

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
165
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 21:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
Nick Starkey wrote:1-3 extra jumps somewhere isn't a deal breaker.
You have no idea how much you are wrong. Eha is literally 2 jumps from Kehjari and we were have a VERY hard time keeping up with re-ships against the Caldari in the same system. When we moved into Villasen, it just became so much easier.
Sure, when you're just living somewhere, Hykanima sounds great. But those 5 jumps to just get into the warzone are a huge block to PvP and re-shipping. Just go ask your officers why you moved into Kinakka instead of staying in Hykanima. Or why you haven't moved back into Innia instead. |

Cromwell Savage
Quantum Cats Syndicate Repeat 0ffenders
185
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 21:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
I have never been a fan of the docking mechanics. Especially before this latest update to plexes.
If these updates continue to hinder day old douche rocket farmer alts from o-plexing....then it won't be as bad. But leading up to this update....CCP put the cart in front of the horse... |

Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
220
|
Posted - 2014.06.12 22:10:00 -
[25] - Quote
Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:Nick Starkey wrote:1-3 extra jumps somewhere isn't a deal breaker. You have no idea how much you are wrong. Eha is literally 2 jumps from Kehjari and we were have a VERY hard time keeping up with re-ships against the Caldari in the same system. When we moved into Villasen, it just became so much easier. Sure, when you're just living somewhere, Hykanima sounds great. But those 5 jumps to just get into the warzone are a huge block to PvP and re-shipping. Just go ask your officers why you moved into Kinakka instead of staying in Hykanima. Or why you haven't moved back into Innia instead. This is true. Before all I needed to do was undock in innia to literally get shot at. Not fun at times but hey INSTANT pvp action. With SNIGG next door on Kinakka and frogmil in eha everyone gets fights anywhere in the 3 systems. If only CCP made innia smaller it would have been perfect. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1300
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 02:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:Nick Starkey wrote:1-3 extra jumps somewhere isn't a deal breaker. You have no idea how much you are wrong. Eha is literally 2 jumps from Kehjari and we were have a VERY hard time keeping up with re-ships against the Caldari in the same system. When we moved into Villasen, it just became so much easier. Sure, when you're just living somewhere, Hykanima sounds great. But those 5 jumps to just get into the warzone are a huge block to PvP and re-shipping. Just go ask your officers why you moved into Kinakka instead of staying in Hykanima. Or why you haven't moved back into Innia instead.
At least we agree the no docking rule is a huge block to pvp.
I' m not surprised Gallente are the main proponents of this bad mechanic. They really haven't been in a situation where a large force moved them out. The minmatar in huola have been there for the most part as well but they actually seem sensible enough to realize its not good for the game.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
165
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 02:58:00 -
[27] - Quote
Cearain wrote: At least we agree the no docking rule is a huge block to pvp.
I' m not surprised Gallente are the main proponents of this bad mechanic. They really haven't been in a situation where a large force moved them out. The minmatar in huola have been there for the most part as well but they actually seem sensible enough to realize its not good for the game.
No, the no docking rule is the main driving force to PvP. That's the only reason why the Innia-Eha border was so contested for a good 4-5 months.
And a 'large force to move us out'. Do you just ignore TEST and their fleets? |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
940
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 03:23:00 -
[28] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote:muad dib for the first time in since ever has been hard core plexing like some of us have been for years and doesnt like it.
Nope, he wants to get back to the hard-core business of camping his home station with an insta-mach. But know one comes, boo hoo :) |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1300
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 03:29:00 -
[29] - Quote
Baron' Soontir Fel wrote:Cearain wrote: At least we agree the no docking rule is a huge block to pvp.
I' m not surprised Gallente are the main proponents of this bad mechanic. They really haven't been in a situation where a large force moved them out. The minmatar in huola have been there for the most part as well but they actually seem sensible enough to realize its not good for the game.
No, the no docking rule is the main driving force to PvP. That's the only reason why the Innia-Eha border was so contested for a good 4-5 months. And a 'large force to move us out'. Do you just ignore TEST and their fleets?
Did test move you out? I was not subscribed then so my info is second hand. I did see on the forums something like this:
TEST: Yay we hit tier 4! Gallente: who cares? You didn't kick us out of ____ so we are winning! TEST: Yeah we don't care to kick you out of ____ and don't care that you think we need to do that to win. Gallente: ffs just do it for the fights then!
Then I really don't know what happened to test. Did they put a thousand players in one of your systems and push it? Did Chatgris singlehandedly fight all thousand of them off with nothing but his coercer and a jawbone of an ass?
But here is the faulty assumption. You assume that because there are hot spots now with docking restrictions those hotspots would not exist if the docking restrictions went away. (or at least were somewhat mitigated) But in fact there have always been hotspots in faction war. The only difference was there were also some other places to find pvp. Now its either go to one of 3-5 systems and get blobbed or roam through empty system after empty system. There used to be lots of micro hot spots throughout where you could get some pvp. And you could have bases in different areas so you could reship and get back to the pvp quicker.
Don't get me wrong on the whole I like faction war now more than before inferno. But the docking restriction is not good.
You said it yourself " those 5 jumps to just get into the warzone are a huge block to PvP and re-shipping"
From somone whose exposure to fw is with the militia with the least number of players I can only agree that no docking has been a block to pvp.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
165
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 04:39:00 -
[30] - Quote
What I meant was the non-stop fighting in Eha when TEST moved in and tried to flip it. If we wouldn't have been locked out of the system, we probably wouldn't have put near the effort required to save it. We'd just let it flip, stay in system, and flip it back the instant TEST left the area.
There would literally be no reason to even stay in a particular area of low-sec. Almost all the PvP in the Cal/Gal warzone is driven by the station lock-out restrictions. |

Samira Kernher
Praetorian Auxiliary Force Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
612
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 08:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
Frankly, docking restrictions should be extended to enemy high sec space as well. Definitely not removed.
I'd only support removing docking restrictions if FW was restructured to just be straight up no man's land/pirate warfare instead of actual 'faction' warfare. Considering the way most players treat it, this might be better anyway. |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
368
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 09:10:00 -
[32] - Quote
Station should be forbidden for ennemy of the Faction who owns the system, even neutrals ... if you are not in militia you should have the proper standing to dock up , and of course add pirate faction systems too !! and in pirate stations people with positive sec status ..DENIED !!
my 2 isks RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 09:59:00 -
[33] - Quote
also i just think its effed up that farmers who use a condor to plex make their money, have more places do farm to make money when the faction is losing while the pvpers who live have to suffer this flip flop system ownership have to deal with it and move their stuff around.
since inferno fw has been about the isk and not the pvp and ccp could'nt care less Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
220
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:Station should be forbidden for ennemy of the Faction who owns the system, even neutrals ... if you are not in militia you should have the proper standing to dock up , and of course add pirate faction systems too !! and in pirate stations people with positive sec status ..DENIED !!
my 2 isks I'm sure the pirates JF alt would love that. Undocking in Jita at -10.0 in a Rhea to try and send in supplies to pirate stations. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:10:00 -
[35] - Quote
Why do people think that this is a better reason to fight?
Yes you try and take a system so you can dock and the enemy cant but its farmers who dont actually live in low sec anyway that actually control it ultimately.
The ability isnt actually governed by the pvpers who actually live there. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
368
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
some people fight because they want , because they like that , But MOST people fight because they have to defend something . Best , fastest , sure way to make someone fight is to go after his house/children.. , just call the guy and say Come at me Bro not as efficient thant going after the guy'shome.
So docking rights is actually the best way to "force" people to fight ( you have POCOs/POSes too for that).
So my friend deal with it move your assets and you can choose a home outside the warzone :( RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:21:00 -
[37] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:some people fight because they want , because they like that , But MOST people fight because they have to defend something . Best , fastest , sure way to make someone fight is to go after his house/children.. , just call the guy and say Come at me Bro not as efficient thant going after the guy'shome.
So docking rights is actually the best way to "force" people to fight ( you have POCOs/POSes too for that).
So my friend deal with it move your assets and you can choose a home outside the warzone :(
In la la land yes.
That only goes for last remaining key systems. 99% of systems people do not care about and the farmers flip back and forth while the pvpers feed off the scraps. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
368
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
so humm you just want :
people to farm like hell .. just to have Lp/money but the farm has no cosequences on the rest everyone can dock up like in high sec no matter what ? right?
RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:29:00 -
[39] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:so humm you just want :
people to farm like hell .. just to have Lp/money but the farm has no cosequences on the rest everyone can dock up like in high sec no matter what ? right?
Well i dont like the fact that the isk fountain that inferno made fw for farmers was a good thing at all, but tiring it with station lockouts - its no wonder all the pvpers left and went pirate.
Even if you deplex a system you like when you sleep 50 farmers all night have it back to 15% and then if you dont kill or chase them off 50 more do plexing making their money while the person who wants the system gets nothing for his effort. Its not like farmers pay pvpers to keep other farmers busy. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Christine Peeveepeeski
The Amarrian Lyceum
534
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:49:00 -
[40] - Quote
I can't agree Muad, although I do believe FW needs a major shake up of how it works since the system introduced created a silly focus on isk as the primary reason FW is played rather than the content generation.
Docking rights give a reason to care about the warzone at all, while I know it's hard for vets to muster any level of care for new players and those that aren't bitter yet the SOV system is an exciting reason to fight for. Most vets beat that out of people (at least in amarr) but ultimately it's a reason to undock and have a blast. It's a reason to banter in local and it's a reason to throw ship after ship in pvp while being war targets rather than just being a pirate.
The one change I would make to docking rights is that each militia corps stations were always locked to enemy militias and militia members can always dock. Whether that system is owned by friendlies or enemies. That said I haven't looked at the map to see how balanced that actually would be but it would mean areas historically asssociated with militias are slightly easier to hold defensively and newbies are not screwed as soon as they enter militia for low sec. It's also a way to slightly unfuck the crazy RP world FW is in right now. |

Claud Tiberius
46
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 10:51:00 -
[41] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Nick Starkey wrote:Docking rights make no real difference tbh. Anything stuck inside flipped stations can be contracted to neutral alts and taken away. It is only a very small incovenience with little practical implications. This except I would say its a bigger inconvenience. Docking rights add an inconvenience to participating in fw. That is all it is. You want to pvp? Well you have to travel several jumps to get to then enemy and several more back if you need to reship or even repair. You want to base in a fw system? You have to get an alt account to sit in an empty frigate (save the stabs) and dplex.. Plus this: ShahFluffers wrote:
Personally? I would just like to see docking restrictions lifted. Yes, from a lore/RP point-of-view it makes sense. Yes, it also does make some groups work together more closely than they would like. But it also prevents people from spreading out within the warzone because no one group can stay online all the time to keep their system from being farmed to vulnerable and captured. This in turn creates "bunker" systems that are nigh impregnable while everything else remains more or less undefended... or groups live just outside the warzone to avoid the lockouts altogether... or people just leave FW and become full pirates because well, having where you can and cannot dock because some people did more PvE than you leaves a bad taste in your mouth and is not the reason you joined the militia in the first place.
It is like 0.0 SOV being decided by how much ratting, anomalies, and mining your alliance does over the others... with ship on ship combat being completely unnecessary or even being discouraged (because you are not ratting, running anomalies, or mining to keep SOV).
Really I still don't see how it makes sense that my own militia won't let me dock in its stations, but whatever. One word.
Logistics.
Once upon a time the Golem had a Raven hull and it looked good. Then it transformed into a plataduck. The end. |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
560
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 11:01:00 -
[42] - Quote
I'm 'young' so I only experienced the current system. I think it's great.
Defending a home system is the most compelling reason to fight. Both for practical reasons and for very real 'human nature' reasons - sure it's just a game but 'fight for our homeland' rings in anybody's heart.
Logistics win wars. Having a station in-system rather than in the next-door system rather than just a staging POS makes a huge difference. Makes the pew pew more strategical.
Everyone can feel the pain regarding fending off annoying farmer hoards in your system, but that's a reason to nerf farming, not to make the colors on the warzone map meaningless. Kronos seems like a good step in the right direction, timer rollbacks would be the icing on the cake. |

Irya Boone
Never Surrender.
368
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 11:03:00 -
[43] - Quote
Really I still don't see how it makes sense that my own militia won't let me dock in its stations, but whatever.
I couldn't be more agree than that considering in high sec a gallente militian can dock in jita .. with no problem at all ..
But it's why i want some neutrals corp owning FW stations in the warzone ( like pirates ones, SOe etc etc ) and keep the restrictions as it is . OR
make the station Ownership change after 7 DT if the system is under gallente occupancy after 7Dt then the Federation customs or federation Navy ( whatever gallente corp) take ownership and put its own agents and service.. ( but i think this solution would be a pain in the ass for the Dev!!) RENAME WH systems With the name of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It will be awesome.
GalMIl>>ALL |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 11:08:00 -
[44] - Quote
Well.
FW is about about isk and farming since inferno, not pvp.
People who pvp who have to put up with farmers flipping their systems and therefore messing with their docking.
If you defensive plex to keep a system you invite more farmers to try and take it from you, you dont get much isk and risk everything. At this point people, corps of people, just leave and pirate instead and make a farmer alt. Happened so much.
FW is doing nothing for pvp, now if its only meant to be a isk paradise only for week old newbs fine just say that and we can quit too, but stop pretending like ccp care about pvp in fw. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
940
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 11:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Why do people think that this is a better reason to fight?
Yes you try and take a system so you can dock and the enemy cant but its farmers who dont actually live in low sec anyway that actually control it ultimately.
The ability isnt actually governed by the pvpers who actually live there.
Confirming that farmers ultimately control mu ability to dock in Nisuwa  |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
561
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 11:48:00 -
[46] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:FW is doing nothing for pvp, now if its only meant to be a isk paradise only for week old newbs fine just say that and we can quit too, but stop pretending like ccp care about pvp in fw. FW has these nice things called 'complexes', with acceleration gates restricting ship sizes and deadspace restricting 'warp-to' both inside and outside. It's a unique tactical environment for solo and small-gang PVP and a meaningful alternative to fighting on gates, stations, structures and celestials.
Additionally, if you PVP in FW, you usually end up making decent ISK with very little need to 'grind'.
That's what FW is doing for PVP, imo.
The rest is far less important, though the current system gives fun occupancy battles too, at least in the gal-cal warzone. |

Charlie Firpol
Noob Mercs Monkeys with Guns.
232
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 11:51:00 -
[47] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Well.
FW is about about isk and farming since inferno, not pvp.
People who pvp who have to put up with farmers flipping their systems and therefore messing with their docking.
If you defensive plex to keep a system you invite more farmers to try and take it from you, you dont get much isk and risk everything. At this point people, corps of people, just leave and pirate instead and make a farmer alt. Happened so much.
FW is doing nothing for pvp, now if its only meant to be a isk paradise only for week old newbs fine just say that and we can quit too, but stop pretending like ccp care about pvp in fw.
Now you-¦re just trolling. STFU please. |

gas guzzler
The Church of Awesome Circle-Of-Two
2
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 15:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Well.
FW is about about isk and farming since inferno, not pvp.
People who pvp who have to put up with farmers flipping their systems and therefore messing with their docking.
If you defensive plex to keep a system you invite more farmers to try and take it from you, you dont get much isk and risk everything. At this point people, corps of people, just leave and pirate instead and make a farmer alt. Happened so much.
FW is doing nothing for pvp, now if its only meant to be a isk paradise only for week old newbs fine just say that and we can quit too, but stop pretending like ccp care about pvp in fw.
the isk from fw means pvpers have to do LESS isk farming to replace losses.
|

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1387
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 16:02:00 -
[49] - Quote
gas guzzler wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:Well.
FW is about about isk and farming since inferno, not pvp.
People who pvp who have to put up with farmers flipping their systems and therefore messing with their docking.
If you defensive plex to keep a system you invite more farmers to try and take it from you, you dont get much isk and risk everything. At this point people, corps of people, just leave and pirate instead and make a farmer alt. Happened so much.
FW is doing nothing for pvp, now if its only meant to be a isk paradise only for week old newbs fine just say that and we can quit too, but stop pretending like ccp care about pvp in fw. the isk from fw means pvpers have to do LESS isk farming to replace losses.
most of the people who plex for isk with alts arnt actually fw pvpers. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
281
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 17:30:00 -
[50] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:gas guzzler wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:FW is about about isk and farming since inferno, not pvp. the isk from fw means pvpers have to do LESS isk farming to replace losses. most of the people who plex for isk with alts arnt actually fw pvpers. 1. What FW has been used for since Inferno in 3/4 of the factions and what it's actually intended to be can be 2 very different things. IMO, it was never intended as an ATM for AFK alts.
2. Plexing by AFK alts is way down.
3. Farmers who refuse to PvP will quickly find their isk/hour decrease to the point where even mining veldspar in highsec will be more lucrative.
4. If FW was intended to be a "sov lite" style system, or a PvP centric system, then station lockouts need to stay. |

Baron' Soontir Fel
Justified Chaos
169
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 18:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
Anyone just needs to look at the amount of ships killed in FW low-sec to prove that FW is about the PvP and not the ISK. Don't we have the most dangerous space in Eve? Sounds like PvP to me.
I really venture all of you people who think FW is all about ISK to venture into Null-sec and see how many people dock/cloak up when any kind of neutral enters system. |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate
397
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 19:23:00 -
[52] - Quote
Charlie Firpol wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:Well.
FW is about about isk and farming since inferno, not pvp.
People who pvp who have to put up with farmers flipping their systems and therefore messing with their docking.
If you defensive plex to keep a system you invite more farmers to try and take it from you, you dont get much isk and risk everything. At this point people, corps of people, just leave and pirate instead and make a farmer alt. Happened so much.
FW is doing nothing for pvp, now if its only meant to be a isk paradise only for week old newbs fine just say that and we can quit too, but stop pretending like ccp care about pvp in fw. Now you-¦re just trolling. STFU please.
Farmers gonna farm, trollers gonna troll. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1301
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 19:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:I'm 'young' so I only experienced the current system. I think it's great.
Defending a home system is the most compelling reason to fight. Both for practical reasons and for very real 'human nature' reasons - sure it's just a game but 'fight for our homeland' rings in anybody's heart.
Logistics win wars. Having a station in-system rather than in the next-door system rather than just a staging POS makes a huge difference. Makes the pew pew more strategical..
Giving a pvp advantage to the side that can dock does not necessarily add strategy. It's just giving a pvp advantage to the winning side.
I know Gallente kept asking everyone to come fight in this or that system where you all have a clear pvp advantage. You then complain when the enemy doesn't do that. But here is the thing. Most pvpers don't want to fight in a system where they have a disadvantage. Why should they?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
571
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 19:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Giving a pvp advantage to the side that can dock does not necessarily add strategy. It's just giving a pvp advantage to the winning side.
I know Gallente kept asking everyone to come fight in this or that system where you all have a clear pvp advantage. You then complain when the enemy doesn't do that. But here is the thing. Most pvpers don't want to fight in a system where they have a disadvantage. Why should they? It's strategy by definition.
Since having docking rights in a station system gives an advantage, it makes strategical sense to flip that system.
Also, I don't assume to know what 'most pvpers' think, but the pvpers I know - GalMil - are more than happy to fight in Caldari home systems. Recent examples are Enaluri, Innia and Kehjari. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
281
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 19:44:00 -
[55] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Cearain wrote:Giving a pvp advantage to the side that can dock does not necessarily add strategy. It's just giving a pvp advantage to the winning side.
I know Gallente kept asking everyone to come fight in this or that system where you all have a clear pvp advantage. You then complain when the enemy doesn't do that. But here is the thing. Most pvpers don't want to fight in a system where they have a disadvantage. Why should they? It's strategy by definition. Since having docking rights in a station system gives an advantage, it makes strategical sense to flip that system. Also, I don't assume to know what 'most pvpers' think, but the pvpers I know - GalMil - are more than happy to fight in Caldari home systems. Recent examples are Enaluri, Innia and Kehjari. Guess that just makes us a really Elite class of PvPers - we fight even when we've got a disadvantage!!!!
Maybe we should really make things difficult on ourselves and start a civil war or something.... |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
571
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 20:01:00 -
[56] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:Guess that just makes us a really Elite class of PvPers - we fight even when we've got a disadvantage!!!!
Maybe we should really make things difficult on ourselves and start a civil war or something.... 
We just like to fight, is all!
I respect other people's opinions, but I really don't understand this 'coax people to fight' mentality. Random examples I recently read:
- Remove learning implants, so people will pvp more without risking them
- Remove killboards, so people won't stress about efficiency
- Remove cynos from lowsec, so people won't be afraid of being dropped
- This thread: remove station locks in FW. Or please CCP, at least give us our SPROT stations back!
- Etc. etc.
WTF? If you want to fight, undock and fight. Else station spin all day. If I wanted to shoot at people that need to be 'convinced' or 'forced' to PVP, I'd be a suicide ganker. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1301
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 20:07:00 -
[57] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Cearain wrote:Giving a pvp advantage to the side that can dock does not necessarily add strategy. It's just giving a pvp advantage to the winning side.
I know Gallente kept asking everyone to come fight in this or that system where you all have a clear pvp advantage. You then complain when the enemy doesn't do that. But here is the thing. Most pvpers don't want to fight in a system where they have a disadvantage. Why should they? It's strategy by definition. Since having docking rights in a station system gives an advantage, it makes strategical sense to flip that system..
Or avoid it.
Gully Alex Foyle wrote: Also, I don't assume to know what 'most pvpers' think, but the pvpers I know - GalMil - are more than happy to fight in Caldari home systems. Recent examples are Enaluri, Innia and Kehjari.
I am just going based on anecdotal experience. Pvpers don't want to fight in situations that favor the enemy. Maybe your experience is different.
As for Gallente using overwheliming force, that's fine and good. The docking advantage won't always be decisive. Both sides in equal numbers and ships on either side of a gate and neither wants to jump in to the other. If one side has 20 cruisers and the other only has 3 frigates the cruisers will go ahead and jump in - assuming they want to bother with it.
Looking at the forums I saw many gallente seemed puzzled that Test didn't want to fight in your home systems. Didn't they get it? They were more interested in tiers and lp gains from that than taking some imagined "homeland" that you told them about.
I am just suggesting that perhaps its because you guys have a considerable advantage there. If you didn't have such a big advantage maybe you would have see more offensives. Gallente turtled up and complained that no one wanted to bang their knuckles on your shell. Why should they? You could keep docking there all you wanted but that didn't enable you to prevent them from achieving their goals of taking systems and getting better lp payouts.
I say, let everyone dock once the system is contested. I think you will see much more fighting throughout the warzone than you do now. I think it would add a small amount of strategy and it would make people much more likely to fight for that first offensive plex rather than just figure they can dplex in an empty frigate later.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Drunk 'n' Disorderly
355
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 20:19:00 -
[58] - Quote
all i read from op was boohoo its boring now tmfed cant camp station with a carrier and mach no more GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
571
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 20:23:00 -
[59] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Both sides in equal numbers and ships on either side of a gate and neither wants to jump in to the other. I've honestly never flown with an FC that wouldn't jump the fleet in that situation. If I ever did, it would likely be the last time I joined his fleets.
Cearain wrote:Looking at the forums I saw many gallente seemed puzzled that Test didn't want to fight in your home systems. They tried, they failed, they gave up because yes, their objective was LP.
GalMil's objective is, above all, fights. So we had a blast murdering Test both in Eha (while they tried to take it) and in Innia (that became our go-to system for fights).
We didn't fight Test in Innia to take the system (though sure, it would've been awesome) but for the sake of fights.
Cearain wrote:I say, let everyone dock once the system is contested. I think you will see much more fighting throughout the warzone than you do now. Maybe, maybe not. I like the current system for the reasons I stated above. And there's no shortage of fights in Gal-Cal warzone. So why fix it if it ain't broke? |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1391
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 20:57:00 -
[60] - Quote
it just removes pvp ability and is govened by farmers!
if fw is just ment to be pve isk fountain just tell us so we can go pirate. thanks. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
282
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 20:58:00 -
[61] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Looking at the forums I saw many gallente seemed puzzled that Test didn't want to fight in your home systems. Didn't they get it? They were more interested in tiers and lp gains from that than taking some imagined "homeland" that you told them about.
I am just suggesting that perhaps its because you guys have a considerable advantage there. If you didn't have such a big advantage maybe you would have see more offensives. Gallente turtled up and complained that no one wanted to bang their knuckles on your shell. Why should they? You could keep docking there all you wanted but that didn't enable you to prevent them from achieving their goals of taking systems and getting better lp payouts. What you saw was TEST crowing that they had "won" FW because of the loads of LP/isk they were making, and Gallente saying "we'll agree you won as soon as you can actually take something we defend". There was no confusion over their goals, just smack talk over their level of "success" at FW overall.
And hooo, boy... you should take a stroll down memory lane through our killboards. Eha was a non-stop, 23/7 bloodbath for MONTHS while TEST was in FW. You're out of your mind if you think they didn't try to take our homes - we just decided not to let them, numbers and advantages be damned. Had TEST played things differently, they definitely had the mass along with the rest of CalMil to take the warzone... but we were better, and more determined, so they never could.
As in so many ways, you are ill informed about our warzone and the events in it, and draw incredibly erroneous conclusions from those misconceptions. In short, you're bad and should feel bad about it. |

Veskrashen
Justified Chaos
282
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 21:00:00 -
[62] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:it just removes pvp ability and is govened by farmers!
if fw is just ment to be pve isk fountain just tell us so we can go pirate. thanks. Not governed by farmers, we PvP just fine with the mechanic in place. You're doing it wrong. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1391
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 21:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
Veskrashen wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:it just removes pvp ability and is govened by farmers!
if fw is just ment to be pve isk fountain just tell us so we can go pirate. thanks. Not governed by farmers, we PvP just fine with the mechanic in place. You're doing it wrong.
you cannot be serious *throws racket down* Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
572
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 21:04:00 -
[64] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Veskrashen wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:it just removes pvp ability and is govened by farmers!
if fw is just ment to be pve isk fountain just tell us so we can go pirate. thanks. Not governed by farmers, we PvP just fine with the mechanic in place. You're doing it wrong. you cannot be serious *throws racket down* Chalk flew up!!!
|

Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
505
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 21:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
As previously mentioned, docking rights are the only real consequence of Faction Warfare.
The fights over station systems are now the hottest and best (albeit horrible T1 attrition wars) centres for action in the whole FW arena.
Yes, stuff can be slid through the station side door with neutral alts to escape some of the ramifications of losing control of your station which is a good thing unlike being 100% locked out in Null - but it is still a major pain for someone to have to do logistically (which is a nifty consequence/penalty for losing in itself).
Now if only system upgrades actually meant something too there might even be worthwhile fighting over non-station systems too. |

Stalking Mantis
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
503
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 08:20:00 -
[66] - Quote
This is how you keep a system 1
This is how you keep a system 2
Muad you need to get more active on recruiting some quality folk, you can't do it alone trust me.
We Are Recruiting. Proud Member of 'The HotPocket' Crew. What It's Like in Militia Chat http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzYm3ig7tak |

Ribor
Elysian. Heiian Conglomerate
12
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 03:49:00 -
[67] - Quote
Stupid post. Those of you who say "oh it's not even a real consequence I can get my stuff out on a neutral alt", you're missing the big picture. Sure YOU can get YOUR stuff out but can you organize that at a corp/alliance level and can you stage out of a station you can't enter? No, and I think we all know that the ability to stage out of a invulnerable structure that can hold whatever you need is not minor in any way. If you think stations aren't important, you're stupid or doing it wrong or both.
TL;DR keeping your enemy from staging out of a station is important and the only reason station systems get hotly contested, quit whining. |

Endeveren Erata
State Protectorate Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 16:04:00 -
[68] - Quote
Hoooooooold the phone... My man Muad 'dib is actually working for some isk now?
OMG someone find him a sugar daddy quick this will not end well! |

Luscar Seneca
Elysian. Heiian Conglomerate
5
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 22:08:00 -
[69] - Quote
Im finding the opinions of the pilots from the amarr/minmatar wz are way off base when it comes to the fw experience in the caldari/gallente wz. To bre honest, the warzone is what you make it. We have plenty of fights because we have willing combatants on both sides of militias. We fight to win without worrying if we lose. We ideally wont suicide welp into eachother but fighting for your home systems forces you to do some crazy ****. Which is a plus for station lockouts being conflict drivers.
Sounds to me like the other warzone is full of pussies that wont engage unless youre sure of victory. Which is sad. Which means youre not really pvp dudes, just want easy ganks. Ive got plenty of respect for my gallente enemies and my caldari bros who fight and make my warzone something awesome to be a part of.
Use the mechanics to your advantage, recruit hard and make some pushes. Try to get 'even' fights before escalating into shinies and big gangs. Change doctrines to combat numbers, bash poses or resources of the enemy. Theres alot if things that can be done to change that warzone, someone has to just start doing it instead of complaining about it. Go have fun doing something different than youre doing now in the wz. Apparently it couldnt get any worse so why not?
Hope you guys figure out a way to make that wz as good an experience as mine. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
410
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 23:07:00 -
[70] - Quote
Luscar Seneca wrote:
Sounds to me like the other warzone is full of pussies that wont engage unless youre sure of victory. Which is sad. Which means youre not really pvp dudes, just want easy ganks.
yep this is amarr minmatar fw warzone. our group in sahtogas is the only group in amarr that undocks with the notion of 'what can we undock that is soooo ****** that they think they can kill us and wont run from'
cuz you know if they bring hacs we arnt allowed to bring hacs. we are only allowed to bring t1 cruiser. Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro |

Luscar Seneca
Elysian. Heiian Conglomerate
5
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 23:36:00 -
[71] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote: yep this is amarr minmatar fw warzone. our group in sahtogas is the only group in amarr that undocks with the notion of 'what can we undock that is soooo ****** that they think they can kill us and wont run from'
cuz you know if they bring hacs we arnt allowed to bring hacs. we are only allowed to bring t1 cruiser.
Yeah, I spent a few months in minmatar space and it was fairly similar, I still managed to develop decent fights in micro gangs dessie down. Im thinking there must be some way to force them to fight. Do they live in a low sec station? Can you guys put together enough people to flip the system? Im not up to speed with the current goings on but theres been peaks and valleys with the cal/gal wz but when home systems get contested here there is almost always great battles of attrition and fleet doc ship ups and downs for plexes. Bashing pocos or poses?
Somethings gotta give. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
1392
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 23:50:00 -
[72] - Quote
Having a bad sec status makes this worse as you cant just pop to high sec for your stuff all the time, so the whole station thing can make picking a good place to hole up a problem.
again, fw is so much about the money now than the pvp - just say it. you have alts of hundreds of people investing nothing and changing a pvp side for any that attempts to take fw vaguely seriously.
Why do i care? Why dont i just go pitate? Because i have played FW when it was about the pvp and that was damned good fun, i apologize if im just being a bit nostalgic. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
|

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
410
|
Posted - 2014.06.15 23:54:00 -
[73] - Quote
Luscar Seneca wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote: yep this is amarr minmatar fw warzone. our group in sahtogas is the only group in amarr that undocks with the notion of 'what can we undock that is soooo ****** that they think they can kill us and wont run from'
cuz you know if they bring hacs we arnt allowed to bring hacs. we are only allowed to bring t1 cruiser.
Yeah, I spent a few months in minmatar space and it was fairly similar, I still managed to develop decent fights in micro gangs dessie down. Im thinking there must be some way to force them to fight. Do they live in a low sec station? Can you guys put together enough people to flip the system? Im not up to speed with the current goings on but theres been peaks and valleys with the cal/gal wz but when home systems get contested here there is almost always great battles of attrition and fleet doc ship ups and downs for plexes. Bashing pocos or poses? Somethings gotta give. well we have taken every single home system except 1 and theres about 100 of them in there all the time its p much impossible to take down.
and the only people that say 'lets flip huola' are those that couldnt be ****** to plex it. Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro |

Luscar Seneca
Elysian. Heiian Conglomerate
5
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 00:18:00 -
[74] - Quote
I know plenty of people that say things like, "i dont plex im only here for the pew' and these folks can eventually be convinced to plex because it will bring fights. I used to be one of those guys like 3 years ago. In my wz youre far more likely to get fights if youre plexing or running around chasing guys out of plexes.
When we were fighting in gall systems outnumbered we employed the sniper corm ******* doctrine for smalls, i know youre a vet so youve got plenty of ideas for fighting outnumbered im sure. The real fight for us was convincing our pilots and militia members to get on board and moving to a close staging system, the logistics, powering through the losses and the EU timezone deplexing your efforts.
Taking one step at a time and seeing those small goals reached really brought up the morale and got others to buy in. The real fight was getting people involved. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1304
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 04:12:00 -
[75] - Quote
Ribor wrote:Stupid post. Those of you who say "oh it's not even a real consequence I can get my stuff out on a neutral alt", you're missing the big picture. Sure YOU can get YOUR stuff out but can you organize that at a corp/alliance level and can you stage out of a station you can't enter? No, and I think we all know that the ability to stage out of a invulnerable structure that can hold whatever you need is not minor in any way. If you think stations aren't important, you're stupid or doing it wrong or both.
TL;DR keeping your enemy from staging out of a station is important and the only reason station systems get hotly contested, quit whining.
Stage out of it to do what? Drive your enemy further so they have to travel even further to pvp?
If you just want to stage out of a system for pvp then you can do that in a non fw system and you don't need to dplex. Or of course you can stay out of faction war all together.
Vyktor Abyss wrote:As previously mentioned, docking rights are the only real consequence of Faction Warfare.
Whether or not this is true it's irrelevant. Even if it were the only real consequence of faction war that wouldn't mean its a good mechanic.
Stalking Mantis
Those videos are over a year old. Sure there might be some great battles 2 or 3 times a year. But most days you see fw players holding home systems by putting their alts in empty frigates and dplexing. I don't think youtube would have the bandwidth to show all the times systems are held that way.
Veskrashen
I know what I saw. And it was test saying they didn't care about fighting in your home systems. They were interested in the goals set up by ccp in the mechanics - like tiers and lp gains. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order Repeat 0ffenders
942
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 04:40:00 -
[76] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I don't think
The most accurate post you have ever made! |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Drunk 'n' Disorderly
356
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 06:19:00 -
[77] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Im so outa touch with other FW players i just babble
Yup we know GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

David Devant
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
160
|
Posted - 2014.06.16 07:56:00 -
[78] - Quote
Completely disagree with the op. Now that systems are actually defensible, lockouts have become the most important aspect of sov. If I keep you out of 24th Imperial stations and keep TLF ones open I get access to the isk fountain and you do not. It also means (potentially) that the pvpers can begin to direct the actions of the farmers and not the other way around. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1561

|
Posted - 2014.06.16 08:40:00 -
[79] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |