| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Scots Crusader
   |
Posted - 2006.06.26 14:35:00 -
[61]
 Originally by: Spavin ll
Originally by: Scots Crusader
This comes from the official FIFA website:-
6. uses offensive or insulting or abusive language and/or gestures
And it's punishment is a red card!!! I counted 7 English players on saturday swearing on camera. With your idea, england are down to 5 players and thrown out of the W/C before the Dutch/Portugal game even kicked off. This shows that there is no way the rules can or should be enforced to the letter of the law.
IMO its the rule that should be enforced to the letter of the law, if it was you wouldnt get players swearing gesturing to officials/other players.
That is the point, it does not need to be aimed at officials or other players. If you miss a sitter and shout FFS at no one in particular. Letter of the law states you should be sent off. The sending off if for foul/abusive language, not whom it is aimed at.
-----------------------------------------------
O wad some power, the giftie gie us,
To see oursels as ithers see us!
|
Elve Sorrow
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 14:42:00 -
[62]
What bugs me is referrees cant change their decisions based on video replays or whatever. I mean, it's quite easy for us to see whats wrong because we see it from 10 different camera positions, at 1/10th the speed. Let the ref see a few replays if in doubt.
|
Ena'Fi
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 14:44:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Scots Crusader
Originally by: Spavin ll
Originally by: Scots Crusader
This comes from the official FIFA website:-
6. uses offensive or insulting or abusive language and/or gestures
And it's punishment is a red card!!! I counted 7 English players on saturday swearing on camera. With your idea, england are down to 5 players and thrown out of the W/C before the Dutch/Portugal game even kicked off. This shows that there is no way the rules can or should be enforced to the letter of the law.
IMO its the rule that should be enforced to the letter of the law, if it was you wouldnt get players swearing gesturing to officials/other players.
That is the point, it does not need to be aimed at officials or other players. If you miss a sitter and shout FFS at no one in particular. Letter of the law states you should be sent off. The sending off if for foul/abusive language, not whom it is aimed at.
|
Spavin ll
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 14:45:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Ena'Fi
Originally by: Scots Crusader
Originally by: Spavin ll
Originally by: Scots Crusader
This comes from the official FIFA website:-
6. uses offensive or insulting or abusive language and/or gestures
And it's punishment is a red card!!! I counted 7 English players on saturday swearing on camera. With your idea, england are down to 5 players and thrown out of the W/C before the Dutch/Portugal game even kicked off. This shows that there is no way the rules can or should be enforced to the letter of the law.
IMO its the rule that should be enforced to the letter of the law, if it was you wouldnt get players swearing gesturing to officials/other players.
That is the point, it does not need to be aimed at officials or other players. If you miss a sitter and shout FFS at no one in particular. Letter of the law states you should be sent off. The sending off if for foul/abusive language, not whom it is aimed at.
Grr stupid alt posts
|
Harris
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 14:55:00 -
[65]
Says it all really doesn't it.
Sepp Blatter - head of FIFA, the guys who give direction to the referees, said that the ref in last nights game Holland Vs Portugal should have been given a yellow card for his performance
|
Luc Boye
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 15:07:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Elve Sorrow
What bugs me is referrees cant change their decisions based on video replays or whatever. I mean, it's quite easy for us to see whats wrong because we see it from 10 different camera positions, at 1/10th the speed. Let the ref see a few replays if in doubt.
yeah, they have that in bunch of other sports, and its working great (basketball for example).
|
Harris
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 15:51:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Luc Boye
yeah, they have that in bunch of other sports, and its working great (basketball for example).
There are a lot more natural breaks in other games then there are in football, where the game is only supposed to stop for injuries (player is supposed to get off pitch asap) and re-starts after a goal or half time.
I know it doesn't work in reality quite like that but that is where the difficulty in introducing it starts.
If you could get it working without disrupting the flow of the game then it's feasible. After that it's just a matter of opinion as to whether it's needed.
|
Kaeten
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 19:09:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Elve Sorrow
What bugs me is referrees cant change their decisions based on video replays or whatever. I mean, it's quite easy for us to see whats wrong because we see it from 10 different camera positions, at 1/10th the speed. Let the ref see a few replays if in doubt.
thats why imo they should get ear peices then get a comfirmation form the box room if it is punishable by a yellow/red card for example.
High-Sec Piracy Recruitment |
Sarafi
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 23:52:00 -
[69]
The replays would be especially useful for when then whistle is blown for something thats happened in the box, either a penalty is given or the player is booked for diving to me this seems the most important use and would wipe out the nasty diving.
As for the penalty given for italy - a bit harsh, but the defeneder was bloody silly for going on his arse for the tackle anyway.
|
F4ze
|
Posted - 2006.06.27 13:41:00 -
[70]
Edited by: F4ze on 27/06/2006 13:42:42
funny picture
Edit: hotlinking not allowed it seems, you can find the picture here at the bottom: http://www.zattevrienden.be/dag_269
|
Rthor
|
Posted - 2006.06.27 21:21:00 -
[71]
See France-Spain was a good game with good ref.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |