Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3181
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 20:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
The recent deluge of freighter ganking and other hisec lawlessness is a travesty. Yeah I get it, it's Eve you can do what you want, sandbox, HTFU, etc etc etc.
But we people who choose to focus on things other than destructio (and keep Eve running in the process) have no way to fight back! Not just that, but it's worse: those doing productive things are actively helping the destroyers by providing materials, ships, ammo, and fuel! This is terrible!
If you were an automobile manufacturer IRL would you sell your cars to a guy who has a record of using those cars to nudge lorries off the road, or cause horrific traffic accidents on purpose? NO! Why can we not do the same thing?
CCP this is an enemy that only fights on his terms and has the objective of ruining the game. We want to advance and contribute to the game. Give us market pirate blacklisting, or sec status limits on orders, so we can fight them on our terms! More content for everyone and Eve grows.
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Carmen Electra
Drunk Chaos Blood.Drunk
530
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 20:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
This is such a great idea that you should make a brand new thread out of it.
Oh wait...
0/10 |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
6480
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 20:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Seems like a lot of trouble for a feature that is made meaningless by the existence of alts. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22552
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:But we people who choose to focus on things other than destructio (and keep Eve running in the process) have no way to fight back! Yes you do. And even if you didn't, why would you want to?
Quote:If you were an automobile manufacturer IRL would you sell your cars to a guy who has a record of using those cars to nudge lorries off the road, or cause horrific traffic accidents on purpose? Yes. Pretty much all of them do, because it's not really in their interest not to, nor is it their business to police those things.
Oh, and no, the market will never have any limitations on it that reduces its efficiency for the simple reason that this would be horribly bad for the market. If you absolutely have to control who transacts with you, the game already has that functionality. All it means is that you completely remove your ability to sell in bulk and/or at a high margin, though. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Singoth
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
260
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Oh, this gonna be good. Not a terrible idea, at all.
Keep It Simple: set your contact standings. Everyone who is red will not be able to buy things from you on the market or through contracts Also everyone who has war declared on your corp will not be able to buy things from you on the market or through contracts.
PvPers will have to choose carefully who they gonna shoot, because there may be more consequences than just tears Not going to be a popular idea, thus CCP is probably not going to do it, and additionally any ideas like this will be shot down. But it sure is interesting, hypothetically speaking :P
Obligatory: "F&I is that way ------>" Less yappin', more zappin'! |
Qaping Pi
Solvent Green Recycling
12
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
Never met a car dealer who gives a rat's ass who they sell to. Also, alts. Also, faction warfare pilots with low sec status. Also, scammers and other "bad people" whose sec status is irrelevant to their activities. etc. |
Paranoid Loyd
713
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
1/10 some thought and creativity but not much "PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |
Ria Nieyli
11552
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Oh, and no, the market will never have any limitations on it that reduces its efficiency for the simple reason that this would be horribly bad for the market. If you absolutely have to control who transacts with you, the game already has that functionality. All it means is that you completely remove your ability to sell in bulk and/or at a high margin, though.
Not even that, there are bulk trade mailing lists, and you can supply people you like in far off regions for a markup etc. etc.
@OP evading a gank is also fighting back. Do not remove a fly from your friend's forehead with a hatchet.
- Ancient Chinese Proverb |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2108
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Put the pitchfork down son, you'r going to hurt yourself with it. "CAKE CANNOT HOLD UP TO BEING A CHARACTER DAMNIT."
Unsuccessful At Everything |
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3181
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:But we people who choose to focus on things other than destructio (and keep Eve running in the process) have no way to fight back! Yes you do. And even if you didn't, why would you want to? Morals.
Tippia wrote:Quote:If you were an automobile manufacturer IRL would you sell your cars to a guy who has a record of using those cars to nudge lorries off the road, or cause horrific traffic accidents on purpose? Yes. Pretty much all of them do, because it's not really in their interest not to, nor is it their business to police those things. Oh, and no, the market will never have any limitations on it that reduces its efficiency for the simple reason that this would be horribly bad for the market. If you absolutely have to control who transacts with you, the game already has that functionality. All it means is that you completely remove your ability to sell in bulk and/or at a high margin, though. Are you talking about contracts? Because Public contracts cannot be limited by sec status. They could also use this change if it hurts the market's "efficiency" too much (how does processing fewer orders hurt efficiency?).
To all the gankbears here who are (correctly) pointing out that alts circumvent this: good. Every measure should have a countermeasure, this is Eve. More risk and cost to gankers (even in the form of an alt) is a good thing. Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
|
Icarus Able
Revenant Tactical
400
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
This is a kinda interesting idea. Being able to blacklist certain people does make sense. But to do it en masse is kinda dumb and also all these ideas are completely voided by alts. |
Alternative Splicing
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
62
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: But we people who choose to focus on things other than destructio (and keep Eve running in the process) have no way to fight back! Not just that, but it's worse: those doing productive things are actively helping the destroyers by providing materials, ships, ammo, and fuel! This is terrible!
Gallente blaster boat producers are probably making a killing off these ganks, and without aforementioned destruction, EvE stops running; they are giving lots of people jobs and content on the industrial side. You are always in competition with everyone else - why not sell a high volume product which you can get other people to use shutting down your potential competition? Seems like a great business opportunity. Selling goods with a short shelf life ensures business stays good too.
Also neutral alts would make implementing this impossible. If you were seriously hell-bent and wanted to use market anonymity to your advantage, why not sell catalysts a little bit cheaper than you should, wait to see who buys them in bulk, and then gank the freighter that ends up moving them to their intended party-zone? Step up your game. |
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3181
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Alternative Splicing wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote: But we people who choose to focus on things other than destructio (and keep Eve running in the process) have no way to fight back! Not just that, but it's worse: those doing productive things are actively helping the destroyers by providing materials, ships, ammo, and fuel! This is terrible!
Gallente blaster boat producers are probably making a killing off these ganks, and without aforementioned destruction, EvE stops running; they are giving lots of people jobs and content on the industrial side. You are always in competition with everyone else - why not sell a high volume product which you can get other people to use shutting down your potential competition? Seems like a great business opportunity. Selling goods with a short shelf life ensures business stays good too. Also neutral alts would make implementing this impossible. If you were seriously hell-bent and wanted to use market anonymity to your advantage, why not sell catalysts a little bit cheaper than you should, wait to see who buys them in bulk, and then gank the freighter that ends up moving them to their intended party-zone? Step up your game. So all the talk about Eve having non-violent PvP in the market and stuff is smoke and mirrors? I am aware enabling socipoaths is profitable but I'm asking to limit profits in order to not enable crime. Eve would only "stop running" (under your definition) if everyone jumped on board and limted their transactions. They won't, because it's profitable not to.
Anyway must the solution always be "shoot it"? It's a sandbox, shouldn't there be more options than violence all the time? Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Felicity Love
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1938
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:The recent deluge of freighter ganking and other hisec lawlessness is a travesty. Yeah I get it, it's Eve you can do what you want, sandbox, HTFU, etc etc etc.
It's good for business... and you can add "suck it up, princess" to that list, since, well it's EVE.
"Psssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh" -á-- That ambiguous and pseudo-technical term used by management to describe to staff how frakking cool something looks inside their own heads.
|
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1902
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
Singoth wrote:Keep It Simple: set your contact standings. Everyone who is red will not be able to buy things from you on the market or through contracts Also everyone who has war declared on your corp will not be able to buy things from you on the market or through contracts. PvPers will have to choose carefully who they gonna shoot, because there may be more consequences than just tears Not going to be a popular idea, thus CCP is probably not going to do it, and additionally any ideas like this will be shot down. But it sure is interesting, hypothetically speaking :P" It won't work.
I'm a pvper for example. I currently have 4 characters active - pvp, exploration/scouting, nullsec anom/sig running, industry.
Even if someone took a disliking to me because of pvp and decided to block me from buying from them, so what? I don't buy much on this character anyway. Almost all of my buying and selling is done through my industry alt.
That character will never be blocked by anyone because it's an unknown entity, except to one other person on the forum.
So implementing this idea would not affect me one little bit, even if someone wanted to. Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3181
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote: So implementing this idea would not affect me one little bit, even if someone wanted to.
So its like missioning in a Drake when drones get rebalanced. Congratulations, you are playing patch-proof correctly.
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22552
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Morals. LMAO no. Let's not break a core component of the game for RP.
Quote:Are you talking about contracts? Because Public contracts cannot be limited by sec status. I'm talking about contracts and trades, both of which can be targeted to specific users.
Quote:They could also use this change if it hurts the market's "efficiency" too much (how does processing fewer orders hurt efficiency?). Eh, having fewer orders hurts efficiency by very definition. You are advocating a massive mess of divergent price points for the same good. That's pretty horrible in and of itself, and just creates pointless complexity that people will have to work around for no good reason. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Maz Ngomo
1
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Interesting idea OP, but ultimately impossible to implement. Market alts generally don't have negative sec status and the only way to link a specific market trader to another character is if the person tells you who they are or if you hack their account (which is so beyond illegal both in and out of game it's not even funny to joke about).
Maybe if CCP started listing all the characters on accounts or make API information freely available for every account... but hell no that's a terrible idea and I need mind bleach just thinking about it. #keepaltsanonymous |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1903
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:28:00 -
[19] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Congratulations, you are playing patch-proof correctly. As is/will everyone. This idea doesn't provide a non-violent solution to what you are trying to do.
I'm all for more diversity and if PvE players have more tools that they feel comfortable using in order to "fight back", then great.
You just have to realise though, that many players within Corps/Alliances like CODE., The Marmite Collective, etc. already use their own industry/hauling alts.
Solutions can be used by anyone, even non-violent ones.
You already have violent solutions to your perceived problem. Opening up other non-violent means to fight back will also open up other fronts on which people can also fight against you.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Alternative Splicing
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:30:00 -
[20] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: So all the talk about Eve having non-violent PvP in the market and stuff is smoke and mirrors? I am aware enabling socipoaths is profitable but I'm asking to limit profits in order to not enable crime. Eve would only "stop running" (under your definition) if everyone jumped on board and limted their transactions. They won't, because it's profitable not to.
Anyway must the solution always be "shoot it"? It's a sandbox, shouldn't there be more options than violence all the time?
Who says market PvP is non-violent just because there aren't any wrecks generated?
If you are really a conscientious objector, just build skiff and shield mods. |
|
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3186
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Quote:Anyway must the solution always be "shoot it"? It's a sandbox, shouldn't there be more options than violence all the time? There are. You just have to choose to use them. Your choice not to do so isn't sufficient reason to break the engine that makes the game turn around. When the only solutions to an economic problem are "shoot the *******" and "give up and go back to trading in shiny pebbles and using an abacus" there is a need for a new solution. Eve being what it is, that needs to involve a change to mechanics. Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2392
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Congratulations, you are playing patch-proof correctly. As is/will everyone. This idea doesn't provide a non-violent solution to what you are trying to do. I'm all for more diversity and if PvE players have more tools that they feel comfortable using in order to "fight back", then great. You just have to realise though, that many players within Corps/Alliances like CODE., The Marmite Collective, etc. already use their own industry/hauling alts. Solutions can be used by anyone, even non-violent ones. You already have violent solutions to your perceived problem. Opening up other non-violent means to fight back will also open up other fronts on which people can also fight against you. Scipio ...
It's Petrus.
He's trolling ... The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499
- Stop staring at them! ;) -
|
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3186
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote: You already have violent solutions to your perceived problem. Opening up other non-violent means to fight back will also open up other fronts on which people can also fight against you.
Good. I'm proposing a new way to play, not a "make everything easy-mode" button. Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22552
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:35:00 -
[24] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:When the only solutions to an economic problem are "shoot the *******" and "give up and go back to trading in shiny pebbles and using an abacus" there is a need for a new solution. Eve being what it is, that needs to involve a change to mechanics. No. Just build your own. No mechanics need to be changed in the process, and doing so would just break things and kill one of the key points of the market.
All the tools you need are there. If you can't be arsed to build it, then that's just another check-box on the list of things that aren't sufficient reason to break a core mechanic, right alongside the other ones you've offered so far. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7279
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:37:00 -
[25] - Quote
I can't imagine that this poorly thought out, knee jerk reaction of an idea would be abused by Goons at all... nope.
Oh, and LOL at "destructio". Is that like fellatio, but with guns? Feyd's near constant sexual innuendos have never been more apt. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
1748
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
Blacklists and whitelists are useful for Local, and in-game comms. If applied to the market it suddenly Balkanizes the regional markets and creates "guild only" markets (look at ESO's subreddit to see why such a mechanism destroys interplayer interaction on a world scale).
Market PVP is better conducted through pricing. Blacklists are easily circumvented by those with many alts (you know, the kinds of players that gank), and will lock out good customers (why? because EVE won't have the capacity to do per pilot blacklisting and people will resort to alliance/corp blacklisting instead.. just like they do for their contact lists).
You want to hurt ganking? Profit off the modules they buy. (assumption: happiness in EVE is zero sum). .. when everything else is gone .. |
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3186
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:When the only solutions to an economic problem are "shoot the *******" and "give up and go back to trading in shiny pebbles and using an abacus" there is a need for a new solution. Eve being what it is, that needs to involve a change to mechanics. No. Just build your own. No mechanics need to be changed in the process, and doing so would just break things and kill one of the key points of the market. All the tools you need are there. If you can't be arsed to build it, then that's just another check-box on the list of things that aren't sufficient reason to break a core mechanic, right alongside the other ones you've offered so far. So... if I asked for CCP to fix the forum eating my posts your solution would be to tell me to go build my own forum system and get people using them because the tools are there? Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Petrus Blackshell
Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch. Sev3rance
3186
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:44:00 -
[28] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote: Scipio ...
It's Petrus.
He's trolling ...
That's a very mean thing to say. I honestly propose an idea to improve Eve for everyone by enabling more economic conflict and that means I'm trolling? Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1903
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:53:00 -
[29] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Good. I'm proposing a new way to play, not a "make everything easy-mode" button. Then surely you should be celebrating the Code and the organisation that has built around it?
They also dislike the easy-mode playstyle of bots and people in highsec that have a general disregard for their own safety.
So if I understand you correctly, you want this feature in order to use against people who get ganked because they are playing the game on easy-mode. I think the title of your thread might be a little misleading then. Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
BuckStrider
Nano-Tech Experiments
318
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 21:57:00 -
[30] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:The recent deluge of freighter ganking and other hisec lawlessness is a travesty. Yeah I get it, it's Eve you can do what you want, sandbox, HTFU, etc etc etc.
But we people who choose to focus on things other than destructio (and keep Eve running in the process) have no way to fight back! Not just that, but it's worse: those doing productive things are actively helping the destroyers by providing materials, ships, ammo, and fuel! This is terrible!
If you were an automobile manufacturer IRL would you sell your cars to a guy who has a record of using those cars to nudge lorries off the road, or cause horrific traffic accidents on purpose? NO! Why can we not do the same thing?
CCP this is an enemy that only fights on his terms and has the objective of ruining the game. We want to advance and contribute to the game. Give us market pirate blacklisting, or sec status limits on orders, so we can fight them on our terms! More content for everyone and Eve grows.
Two things....
You'll probably be getting an email soon from some mission running carebear that got blown up because of your 'Nerf Hisec' heresy.
and
Have you considered buying a permit from a New Order agent? At 10m per year, it's a real bargain.
Mine smart. Mine safe. Purchase your mining permit today...... www.minerbumping.com |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |