| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Worrlock
   |
Posted - 2003.10.09 17:46:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Worrlock on 09/10/2003 17:50:16
 Quote:
Before a Raven pilot comes squawking in to peck out your eyes, the Siege Launchers take a goodly sized amount of CPU. Fitting 6 requires cpu enhancers and a lot of eletronics skill. They are the equivalent of 1400mm and Tachyons when it comes to trying to squeeze them on a ship.
But then again, if the Raven pilot goes for balance instead of stupidity (ie: 2-3 siege launchers and heavy launchers in the rest), they'll have a ton of configuration options left.
Heaven forbid you have to actually train skills up to get the best config.
With lvl 2BS's it should be POSSIBLE to have the BEST Config. It would just require extremely high skills to get it. Now the ultimate config is ofcourse arguable but there is no way a Scorpion should be ranked by anyone as the #1 BS. Throw cost out the window, totally forget about it and pretend they are all free. Now if anyone says Scorp then it needs a nerf. A Scorps specifif role should be to EW other BS's. There is no way 1 BB should be able to EW a BS unless it went ALL EW. No booster, no hardeners, nothing. All lvl 2 Battleships base sensor strength needs to be raised to atleast 20.
Other then that they are all fine. The Raven is perfect just the way it is. If the scorp has more CPU then the raven then the Scorp needs a CPU nerf.
And all lvl 2 battleships should get another Medium slot. I don't think they all need one, but to make it fair give everyone one.
----------------------------------------------
When you die and die you will, you will die to the sound of applause.
|
Ukiah
|
Posted - 2003.10.09 19:49:00 -
[32]
My Megathron was recently patched from an 8-4-6 to an 8-4-7.
You propose adding 1 more mid for every BS. That means my BS would then be an 8-5-7. Now, that would be SUPER cool for me, but I can there would be people who'd STILL feel like their BS is crap and mine is overbalanced.
|
dalman
|
Posted - 2003.10.09 20:06:00 -
[33]
Quote:
But then again, if the Raven pilot goes for balance instead of stupidity (ie: 2-3 siege launchers and heavy launchers in the rest), they'll have a ton of configuration options left.
Sorry to brake it for you, but you have NO CLUE what so ever. You "balance" is stupidity.
Don't you understand that a raven has to fit the SAME TYPE OF LAUCHER IN ALL SLOTS? If you use launchers with different ROF you can't make a nice missile chain, and your missiles will blow up on each other long before they reach the target.
M.I.A. since 2004-07-30 |
Silinary
|
Posted - 2003.10.09 23:36:00 -
[34]
Fireing rates of H-50's and S-110's are both 16.
The only issue will be on getting the ship bonus to firing speed. Whether this will apply to only the S-110's or both. If it's only the S-110's, could possibly use arblast to get similar speed spread.
You can do anything you set your mind to. |
dalman
|
Posted - 2003.10.10 00:11:00 -
[35]
Quote:
Fireing rates of H-50's and S-110's are both 16.
The only issue will be on getting the ship bonus to firing speed. Whether this will apply to only the S-110's or both. If it's only the S-110's, could possibly use arblast to get similar speed spread.
hehe, yea, but I want to see the guy that mount standard H-50 launchers on a battleship. However, you'd still get the problem when you have to reload them...
M.I.A. since 2004-07-30 |
ClawHammer III
|
Posted - 2003.10.10 10:09:00 -
[36]
The Raven gets a bonus on all launchers so It's still possable to make missle chains if you use standard H-50s and S-110s
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |