| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12501
|
Posted - 2014.07.26 13:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
What a joke. You had a system that worked for years and years. Then , about 18 months ago, we start hearing the whining from the cartel propagandists, specifically from malcanis and mynnna, about how unfair manufacturing slots were to poor, destitute null sec.
Lo and behold, we now have this mess.
People being rewarded for leaving highsec and building stuff in more dangerous parts of EVE. Dinsdale is FURIOUS. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12502
|
Posted - 2014.07.26 13:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Antihrist Pripravnik wrote:
Potential player favoritism, but that one should hang in the air without being confirmed until you publish the actual statistics. It sure looks like favoritism.
[/list]
And who would that be? There are MILLIONS of researched BPOs out there. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12512
|
Posted - 2014.07.27 03:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jacque Custeau wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: Ultimately, you're paying fees in your starbase because that's the balance tradeoff for unlimited slots for everyone. If we take slots away we need some form of substitute (pseudo-)scarcity so that everyone in the universe doesn't just build in Jita 4-4, which would be bad for various reasons but primarily because it removes a whole lot of interesting decisions and makes the rest of the map an industrial wasteland, which is not a thing we want. We felt that scaling fees were a good solution to this, as fees were already a thing (even though they were essentially irrelevant) and because ISK is kinda the nexus of decision-making for serious industrialists. If we're going to use fees, we pretty much have to apply them everywhere, including starbases because they scale too well otherwise and we don't want to re-add pseudo-slots to stop them from being too powerful.
There are a limited number of moons, and you removed the ability for POS structures to remotely use a bpo in station. Both of these points guarantee that they won't become too powerful. A medium POS consumes at least 228 mil in fuel a month (assuming 17k fuel block price) - if you are saying that that fee is irrelevant and we still need to pile on manufacturing fees, then remove the fuel requirement. If the vulnerability of POS structures is irrelevant to the payment of this fee, then make them invulnerable.
No.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12513
|
Posted - 2014.07.27 06:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nexus Day wrote:At some point CCP will figure out that creating a perception that the rewards are increasing for some security sectors and decreasing in others will lead people to move in that direction just doesn't work. But hey, I will let the numbers speak for me.
The numbers show that near no industry happens in null. How is it bad that CCP are fixing industry so that there is a reason to leave highsec? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
| |
|