|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 18 post(s) |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
128
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 14:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Rivka wrote: Battleships, Dreadnaughts should NOT get advantages in lower class wormholes.
Lol You have no wormhole experiance what so ever that is very clear now! |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
128
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 14:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Being away further from the hole is not an advantage . The new frigate wormhole only allows frigates and destroyers not bigger ships. besides this is not the thread about the new type of hole. You are quite the troll Rivka. |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
128
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 05:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sith1s Spectre wrote:MicroNova wrote: Have you got a better idea?
Put webs on the battleship/s that you use in addition to your capital ship - web the cap off and have it warp back to the hole @ 0? Doesn't seem that hard tbh That would take as long as slowboatin back to to hole. The setup to do that also needs more people. The result wilt be no more rolling with caps unless there is a big backup fleet. And so no one will be catching a lone closing cap anymore. This change is terrible. |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
132
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 12:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mithandra wrote:This will certainly increase the risk and promote both consensual and non-consensual PvP
Rolling holes will be more difficult, time consuming and dangerous. So? Adapt
It will certainly change most corps and individuals gameplay style. So? Adapt
Its a WH. We were not meant to be here in the first place, but here we are. Still; after all these years.
We learn, test, adapt and develop.
We are Wormholers not cossetted Nullbears. We are meant to be alert not complacent
I do agree that this will probably benefit the larger corporations as opposed to the mom and pop one stop shops we see sprouting up all the time. So? It's EvE , not the women's institute. Adapt.
Thirty odd pages of comments. Some well worded and thought out, some actually brilliant, some just teen angst and bile.
I predict a few weeks of rage rolling mayhem, destruction and forum warfare, then things will settle down. New doctrine will emerge, people will leave, more people will arrive. The wormholes will still be our homes.
I'm not happy with the change as it is, but meh, I'll adapt.
You agruments are not valid. This Will not promote pvp and Will only empty W-space even more. You did not read this thread. No more cap fights, no more small to medium corps only empty wasteland. No one Will be joining only leaving because of this. |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
139
|
Posted - 2014.08.09 11:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sheeana Harb wrote:Ruffio Sepico wrote:Sheeana Harb wrote:I support this change and am looking forward to it being implemented. Afterall, stargates have similar mechanic and we got used to it, didn't we. Then all we need is for capital ships to start use gates and not cynos right? Or at least bounce 40k off a cyno, and we be on equal footing. I don't see how that's relevant to my comparison with stargates. Although let me get my Freighter and jump through a gate . What I wanted to say is that similar mechanic is already in place with stargates. Granted it's always 12km, thus slower ships take longer to jump back, but they also usually have bigger tank. The proposed change takes this exactly mechanic (which everyone has managed to deal with) and adds randomness spin of the wormhole space. Now people will have to be double considerate when jumping through a wormhole with a capital sized ship since it will pose higher risk. And I like that. SO never a cap fight again at a wormhole, that is clearly whay you want. If there are targets on the other side no one will be able to use a cap to gain advantage or even the playing field. This change will kill cap fights on a wormhole. But then again maybe cyno's should removed and then see you try it at gates. |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
141
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 06:43:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dread Nanana wrote:1. Takes a minute to warp off a bit and back to the hole. Unless you jump into a tarp, you are safe. 2. see #1 3. yes, jumping through a WH should not be risk-free experience just because you sit in a dread and want to deny someone else a fight. 4. You must be kidding. With 5-min siege timer, it is almost safe to siege a POS with dreads for 1 cycle and jump out, provided you have some scouts and no one knows your plans. If you are trying to guess that jumping into some empty 0.0 system, or random low sec will get supers dropped on you, you are crazy. Unless you want to roll a hole in Amamake or VFK or someplace like that, you are quite safe. As evidence, if what you said was remotely true, L3gs would not have lost his titan. https://zkillboard.com/kill/40580154/Why didn't someone save him??.. oh right, it takes longer than 1-2 min to actually form any sort of a fleet. Unless your argument is "goons/PL/N3 sit 24/7 online on their multi-boxed SC+archon swarms ready to jump on the poor WHers". Please. I specifically replied because of this fail, fail, fail point. 5. see #1 You are quite the blue donut troll. You don't even have agruments to counter that post. 1) it won't take just a minute and you know it. How about add a 5 minute spool up to capitals to jump to a cyno? That would improve the risk to jump capitals and will be as much fun a this change. 2)you didn't even try to counter that one. 3)you clearly have no idea of the current risk 4)when engaging blue donuters on a hole in blue donut space you will be absolutly certain that they will come prepared and will drop a super onto your caps. They usualy won't even warp to the hole. And we don't have 200 supers standing by to counter that, jumping more caps in would only get us killed even more and cut of our escape route. But then again i don't expect you to know wormhole mechanics. 5)you didn't even try to counter that one.
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
142
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 17:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
O , an other blue donut troll. You clearly never scanned out a w-space chain and seen the emptyness. Why do you want less content for w-space, less content for blue donut space? You clearlt never even tried to close a w-hole and don't even know what the danger is. And cyno's in w-space, you surely must be joking. CCP should remove local in nullsec, do the mass based spawning thingy to cyno's and remove all bounty's . Make em tags instead that they need to carry to high sec to sell to NPC's like with blue loot.
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
142
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 21:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
Simsung Padecain wrote: It may not be such a big deal in PvP situations, but it doesn't solve the problem presented in 700+ posts in this, and 700+ posts in the other thread.
It is a big deal in pvp situations, if this gets added, offensive use of caps will be no more(unless in evictions).
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
148
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 20:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Faren Shalni wrote:Enthropic wrote:Why are you guys even feeding the goon troll? Because most here are used to a much better quality of troll. to the point its difficult to recognise a standard troll :) We should pay them in kind when the sov changes threads are up. Mutual Assured Destruction AKA MAD.
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Disavowed.
148
|
Posted - 2014.08.25 21:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote: you people keep saying that but are unable to come up with one example of what this means
why is this so difficult to do
Hard to disprove your argument when you have none, then there are none we can disprove. |
|
|
|
|