|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 07:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
I suggest that Destroyers follow the real life aspect of what a destroyer really is. Destroyers hunt for subs in real life. they use sonar. Why can't destroyers in Eve have the ability to find cloak ships. Destroyers and destroyers only should have this ablity along with its own module.
Just my .02 Isk |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 07:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Najenna wrote:I suggest that Destroyers follow the real life aspect of what a destroyer really is. Destroyers hunt for subs in real life. they use sonar. Why can't destroyers in Eve have the ability to find cloak ships. Destroyers and destroyers only should have this ablity along with its own module.
Just my .02 Isk Feel like I'm repeating myself but why are stealth bombers even in this game? They don't go underwater irl wtf. Also, destroyers aren't destroyers anymore irl. They just kept the name but they do something completely different now.
You are accurate to a point. Submarines and destroyers still hunt for other subs. But still destroyers were the front line defense against subs in naval warfare. Just like how our carriers in game don't have any type of AA on them but in real life Carriers have AA on them.
I know Eve is not real but warfare is warfare no matter if its real life or in game. 1 ship AKA the cloaker should not have to the ability as a single ship to shut down a system. To me that is over powered. I understand and respect the fact that local shouldn't be used as a intel channel. If local wasn't there you wouldn't know if you had a cloaker in system.
Yes D-scan and scanning mechanics are borked and are still lame after many revamps.
I was just saying to give the destroyer or the tech 2 variant a role. This would actually be a good thing. Afk cloakers now actually have to play and destroyer sales will go up and the forum war on cloakers will be over.
A new war will start and it will be the war on destroyers from all the cloakers crying " Oh my ship was blown up while I was afk at work". |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 07:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Well I have spoken my mind and gave my .02 isk. the way i see it CCP has 3 choices.
1) Make cloaking modules use a fuel.
2) Create a ship or give a ship ( destroyer ) theabilty to hunt cloak ships.
3) Remove cloak from game entirely.
I know 3 isn't going to happen. So CCP really has 2 choices. But this is a issue that has been going on since Cloaking was introduced to the game.
So like everyone else says in New Eden. Addapt or move along to another MMO. |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 07:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Najenna wrote:the way i see it CCP has 3 choices.
1) Make cloaking modules use a fuel.
2) Create a ship or give a ship ( destroyer ) theabilty to hunt cloak ships.
3) Remove cloak from game entirely.
I know 3 isn't going to happen. So CCP really has 2 choices. But this is a issue that has been going on since Cloaking was introduced to the game.
So like everyone else says in New Eden. Adapt or move along to another MMO. 4) Do nothing.
Do you have nothing better to do than follow me everywhere I go? Are you attracted to me? Did I pee in your cereal?
BTW 4) Do nothing is what they have been doing since this war on cloakers has started. The day will come were Cloakers and poor defenseless cyno pilots are fixed.
You all said they would NEVER give jump freighters or freighters any type of fitting slots and look what has happened this year?
So yea I see changes to Cyno pilots and Cloakers coming soon (TM) |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Arcelian wrote:On a more serious note, I do think cloakies are a bit OP, people try to justify it, saying it ties up that account that is sitting there doing nothing..... which is true.
I don't know, the great thing about eve is that no matter what someone or a group of someones do, you can stop them in one way or another, where as with cloak, you are unkillable until the time of your choosing. Doesn't seem very eve-like. And my counter-argument, as usual, is that you have a station to dock up in.
My counter to your counter. Careful not trying to cross MOJO's here.
Not all systems have station in them. Plenty of low sec and 0.0 systems where there aren't any stations. |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Najenna wrote:Well I have spoken my mind and gave my .02 isk. the way i see it CCP has 3 choices.
1) Make cloaking modules use a fuel.
2) Create a ship or give a ship ( destroyer ) theabilty to hunt cloak ships.
3) Remove cloak from game entirely.
I know 3 isn't going to happen. So CCP really has 2 choices. But this is a issue that has been going on since Cloaking was introduced to the game.
So like everyone else says in New Eden. Addapt or move along to another MMO. Why does CCP only have the choices which you have declared? Are you that special of a player that CCP can you do what you suggest? Also if you show everybody a killmail by a afk clocker then I will concede you have point, until there is nothing to talk about
Fair enough. CCP has many choices but in reality there can only be one. Either way it goes someone will be pissed at teh end of this war. Either cloakers win and nothing is done to them, or people asking CCP for a fix win and cloakers get pissed. Either way someone is going to be pissed |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:I think threads like this prove that we actually need more varied ways to wage warfare on the febel minded risk averse I suggest a deployable that mimics your own name in local until the next downtime.
Honestly I was also thinking something along those lines. A deployable module or a P.O.S. module or Sov. module that prevents cloakers kinda the same as a cyno jammer. |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Najenna wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:I think threads like this prove that we actually need more varied ways to wage warfare on the febel minded risk averse I suggest a deployable that mimics your own name in local until the next downtime. Honestly I was also thinking something along those lines. A deployable module or a P.O.S. module or Sov. module that prevents cloakers kinda the same as a cyno jammer. you already have counters for the afk cloker, Namely not being a whiny coward about it and carry on.
First off stop while your ahead. Secondly I am not whining. Thirdly I have done nothing but give constructive imput. I don't whine **** or moan. So get your facts right. |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Najenna wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:I think threads like this prove that we actually need more varied ways to wage warfare on the febel minded risk averse I suggest a deployable that mimics your own name in local until the next downtime. Honestly I was also thinking something along those lines. A deployable module or a P.O.S. module or Sov. module that prevents cloakers kinda the same as a cyno jammer. Whilst were at it why not have a something that prevents any weapons from firing or from any prop module from working.
They do... It is called a target scrambler. It prevents you from targeting other ships. Also there is this thing called a warp jammer and stasis web. Nice fail try again please. |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Najenna wrote: First off stop while your ahead. Secondly I am not whining. Thirdly I have done nothing but give constructive imput. I don't whine **** or moan. So get your facts right.
proposing changes to game mechanics (in this context) is about the biggest form of whine i could imagine.
Man please go back to school. I am in no way complaining crying or whinning as you put it. I am giving constructive imput. |
|
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:54:00 -
[11] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Najenna wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Najenna wrote: First off stop while your ahead. Secondly I am not whining. Thirdly I have done nothing but give constructive imput. I don't whine **** or moan. So get your facts right.
proposing changes to game mechanics (in this context) is about the biggest form of whine i could imagine. Man please go back to school. I am in no way complaining crying or whinning as you put it. I am giving constructive imput. Don't tell people to go back to school if you can't get basic 5th grade literacy right. 'Your' implies ownerships; 'you're' is a compound word for 'you are'. 'You're' an idiot if you can't get them right.
Didn't know that Eve required you to have a degree or diploma. Cause if that is the case why are you here again? |
Najenna
Caldari Deep Space Ventures Black Core Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
I came, I saw, I gave my 2 isk. I am out of this thread. |
|
|
|