You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??

Why don't you all grow a pair.

More ******** comments.

You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??

Here is the real tragedy: what passes for pvp in hi-sec involves only shooting ships that, as I've pointed out elsewhere, are nortorous for not having any guns fitted.

Sad.

But anyways, as per the ******** comment above, how long before the goons hit on that one and afk park a Tier III BC in every hi-sec belt in New-Eden?

Why don't you all grow a pair.

2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space.

Because if it's stupid but works, it's not stupid

Ok, jet-can mining stationary asteroids while constantly moving......

So don't mine into a jet can, or have someone pick them up. The stationary nature of the asteroids isn't a problem.

You must be quite the mining God Tippia.....once you gave up ganking incursion guardians...

I know, pathetic, isn't it.

Man the loot gods hate him

Victim:
Corp:
Alliance:
Faction:
Destroyed: Iteron Mark III
System: Inaro
Security: 0.8
Damage Taken: 1668

Involved parties:

Name:
Security:
Corp:
Alliance: None
Faction: None
Ship: Tempest
Weapon: 1400mm Prototype I Siege Cannon
Damage Done: 1668


Destroyed items:

Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2
Giant Secure Container (Cargo)
Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)

So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ?

2. Ganking is a type of PVP.

It is only as pathetic as the people who know how and what occurs and choose to do no more than whine.

sorry Handsome ******* i had ship longer than you played

stupid stuff

Unless you remain docked indefinatly, you cannot, and never will be able to, prevent being ganked. Gankers will just use a bigger ship, or more ships or whatever.

This is of course despite all the ******** "solutions" that said (fail-wanna-be-carebear-pvper) gankers inevidably come up with to comfort themsleves from what they truely are:

Pathetic, that pvp for you is only shooting ships that never shoot back.

In short, you fail at Eve.

Stuff

Wrong, never was, never will be.

You ask why? Use your brain and you might get why.

Hint: doesn't matter if you shot a empty ship in space or and hauler with a Pilot, both have the same tools to defend them selve.
- ALL T1 industrial ships are fail when it comes to fitting abilitys
- no anti-cargoscan item which they can use -> FAIL balance
- no anti-passive-targeter item -> FAIL balance

You know balance? It's easz stuff, ever tool must have it's anti tool!
ECM <-> ECCM
dampener <-> booster
AB <-> web
MWD <-> scrambler
tracking comp <-> tracking disrupt
THIS IS BALANCE!

Cool when you can fit oversizde largh shield extender even on fight-frigats but not on medium size hauler/miner hulls -> FAIL balance
Cool when you can fit oversized 1600 plates on cruisers but not 400 plates on med size haulers/miners -> FAIL balance

I can understand, when industrials get no weapons ... but there is NO reason to not allow them propper tools to defend their goods!

All your childish problems with FW, 00, null are unimportant compared to this designe FAIL from CCP which must have highest priority to be fixed.

And just for you again: ganking is NO PvP!

You deside to do a CRIME.

CONCORD catches you.

You REALY expect you should get anything at all????
Wow, that's hot .


Let's imagin:
Someone make a bank robbery.
Police catches him.

Police is so kind and says:" we got you but hey, noone cares, here is the money .... oh and sorry that we destroyed the car which you used for it ... let us buy you a new one".

ROFL ???

RLY ????

You my little wannabe rambo friend ... desever to get ... NOTHING!
NO loot, NO insurence payout, NO refound of anything as soon as the police (CONCORD) kills you!

PS: I even go further. YOU should have to pay all the stuff that is lost!

woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow i didn't think butthurt levels could BE this high.

first off, comparing EVE to RL=fail. regardless of what CCP says, EVE is NOT real. its a computer game.

Second, Ganking IS P(layer)V(ersus)P(layer) consentual or not, Its still 2 players in combat.

Finally, jeez i know when it comes to spelling i can be a complete and utter ****** some (most) of the time, but at least TRY.

PVP = player vs player.

It is NOT 2 players in combat as this would mean, BOTH can active act & re-act ... which is NOT the case!
You have ONE who can act and another one who can do NOTHING as in most cases he don't even see what happens (loading screen/lag).

So as this is "just" a game it mean "**** off all fair play and all rules"?
If I check this forum it's the "PvP comunity" which crys hardcore for "BALANCE" all the time.

But as it seams ... balance is just important if it favors your playstyle ... right?





And my spelling is fine as long as people understand the sense which they do.

LACK OF LANGUAGE SKILLS!