Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
look on the test sever talos is king for ganking in 0.9 it not that hard to get the talos up to 1200 dps good for ganking geting cargo of plays coz 0.00 is to hard for you coz you all girls |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
112
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
um?
-á"Nerf it cause I can't fly it". I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Myz Toyou
Bite me inc. Narwhals Ate My Duck
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
your tears are    |

Handsome Hussein
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
missbob wrote:look on the test sever talos is king for ganking in 0.9 it not that hard to get the talos up to 1200 dps good for ganking geting cargo of plays coz 0.00 is to hard for you coz you all girls I thought nine year-olds weren't allowed to play this game... Leaves only the fresh scent of pine. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
I don't get what you are saying. Shouldn't you be claiming 0.0 is to hard for them cause they are whining men?
Anyway, there are plenty of ways to counter ganking. If a person chooses to have it easy, the gankers have it easy too.
Oh, btw a speed fit Retriever can speed tank the Talos. Not good for mining, but funny. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:I don't get what you are saying. Shouldn't you be claiming 0.0 is to hard for them cause they are whining men?
Anyway, there are plenty of ways to counter ganking. If a person chooses to have it easy, the gankers have it easy too.
Oh, btw a speed fit Retriever can speed tank the Talos. Not good for mining, but funny.
Well loss of retriever isnt really such an down,
And no you cant counter ganking except staying docked all the time. Or just be alligned at 3/4 max speed all the time and hit warp every time you see something coming on grid, which will result more fun for "gankers" without sec. hit and destroyed ship. Just warping among the roids watching everyone warps off.. 
Chances that you get ganked however are 1:5000 if we take number of people engaged in suicide ganking vs "high sec dwellers" |

1-Up Mushroom
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
123
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yes
[Tornado, New Setup 1] Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Reactor Control Unit II
Tracking Computer II Tracking Computer II 10MN Afterburner II Stasis Webifier II Warp Disruptor II
1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP L
11,302 Volley 16.5 RoF, Not sure how quickly CONCORD responds but may be able to get in another shot if in 0.5 or similar 5 Senses In A Person... 4 Seasons In A Year... 3 Colors In A Stoplight... 2 Poles On The Earth... ONLY 1-UP MUSHROOM!!!-á If You Like My Sig, Like Me! |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
I thought nine year-olds weren't allowed to play this game...[/quote] sorry played eve for 8 years so i not 9
|

Handsome Hussein
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
missbob wrote:Quote:I thought nine year-olds weren't allowed to play this game... sorry played eve for 8 years so i not 9 So you're eight years old? Leaves only the fresh scent of pine. |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
sorry Handsome ******* i had ship longer than you played |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
sorry Handsome ******* i had ship longer than you played |

bitters much
Nekkid Inc. Higginbotham and Bailey's Circus
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
Victim: Corp: Alliance: Faction: Destroyed: Iteron Mark III System: Inaro Security: 0.8 Damage Taken: 1668
Involved parties:
Name: Security: Corp: Alliance: None Faction: None Ship: Tempest Weapon: 1400mm Prototype I Siege Cannon Damage Done: 1668
Destroyed items:
Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2 Giant Secure Container (Cargo) Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)
So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ? |

bitters much
Nekkid Inc. Higginbotham and Bailey's Circus
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
fail double post  |

Handsome Hussein
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:48:00 -
[14] - Quote
missbob wrote:sorry Handsome ******* i had ship longer than you played Astute observation. That, however, was not the point of any of my posts. Leaves only the fresh scent of pine. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:51:00 -
[15] - Quote
Hurray lets start discussion about yet another suicide gankers and harms and pixels and morals and other things...
I guess NOT. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
189
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
bitters much wrote:Victim: Corp: Alliance: Faction: Destroyed: Iteron Mark III System: Inaro Security: 0.8 Damage Taken: 1668
Involved parties:
Name: Security: Corp: Alliance: None Faction: None Ship: Tempest Weapon: 1400mm Prototype I Siege Cannon Damage Done: 1668
Destroyed items:
Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2 Giant Secure Container (Cargo) Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)
So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11577648
MM Bombers, Best Bombers |

Trainwreck McGee
Ghost Ship Inc.
134
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
If OP is not under 10 years old i would be shocked and saddened CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool |

woe kitten
DaGi Inc.
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
missbob wrote:sorry Handsome ******* i had ship longer than you played
LOL HU*SS*EI*N IS A FILTERED WORD??! Life is a game. You either win or you lose.-á |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 20:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
woe kitten wrote:missbob wrote:sorry Handsome ******* i had ship longer than you played LOL HU*SS*EI*N IS A FILTERED WORD??!
quite hillarious isnt it. |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
the one thing flying a talos do my bum look big in it |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1630
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:00:00 -
[21] - Quote
motherofgod.jpg    GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Ninyania alCladdyth
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
Quote:Destroyed items:
Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2 Giant Secure Container (Cargo) Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)
 |

Sadayiel
Inner Conflict
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
my market pvper senses are tingling i predict a rise in price maybe... |

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
73
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:09:00 -
[24] - Quote
I approve of the new BCs as a ganking platform.
|

De'Veldrin
Element 27 Intrepid Crossing
100
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:16:00 -
[25] - Quote
I approve of ships exploding in Eve regardless of the cause.
It's just good business to make things go boom. Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

Chelone
Outside The Asylum
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:16:00 -
[26] - Quote
I have not heard of this "ganking", nor the ship you mention, and I was unaware of any problem with players being in highsec. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Your contribution is duly noted. |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:17:00 -
[27] - Quote
we have to get a new name for high sec
i say not so high sec pmsl |

Alistair Cononach
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
62
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:29:00 -
[28] - Quote
If you don't want to get ganked in High-Sec by a Teir 3 Battlecruiser, the answer is simple.
See a Teir 3 Battlecruiser show up on your overview?
Warp.
If you're afk'ing, you get what you deserve if you're ganked.
If you're not afk, you should have plenty of time to warp off.
TLDR: Afk-mining is a choice, as is staying when a gank-type-ship shows up in belt.
That choice is you amke at your own risk. |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:36:00 -
[29] - Quote
Funny thing is an Itty 3 doesn't even *need* 3 cargo expanders to carry that GSC. Might atleast have made the guy put a bit more effort into it. |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:46:00 -
[30] - Quote
Alistair Cononach wrote:If you don't want to get ganked in High-Sec by a Teir 3 Battlecruiser, the answer is simple.
See a Teir 3 Battlecruiser show up on your overview?
Warp.
If you're afk'ing, you get what you deserve if you're ganked.
If you're not afk, you should have plenty of time to warp off.
TLDR: Afk-mining is a choice, as is staying when a gank-type-ship shows up in belt.
That choice is you amke at your own risk.
More ******** comments.
You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??
Here is the real tragedy: what passes for pvp in hi-sec involves only shooting ships that, as I've pointed out elsewhere, are nortorous for not having any guns fitted.
Sad.
But anyways, as per the ******** comment above, how long before the goons hit on that one and afk park a Tier III BC in every hi-sec belt in New-Eden?
Why don't you all grow a pair. I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Jita Alt666
571
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:50:00 -
[31] - Quote
Oh well, looks like some people are going to struggle to scan down their 10/10s. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1630
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:50:00 -
[32] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas?? Because if it's stupid but works, it's not stupid.
GǪand it works.
Quote:Why don't you all grow a pair. What for? GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

1-Up Mushroom
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
123
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Denidil wrote:bitters much wrote:Victim: Corp: Alliance: Faction: Destroyed: Iteron Mark III System: Inaro Security: 0.8 Damage Taken: 1668
Involved parties:
Name: Security: Corp: Alliance: None Faction: None Ship: Tempest Weapon: 1400mm Prototype I Siege Cannon Damage Done: 1668
Destroyed items:
Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2 Giant Secure Container (Cargo) Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)
So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ? http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11577648
Man the loot gods hate him 5 Senses In A Person... 4 Seasons In A Year... 3 Colors In A Stoplight... 2 Poles On The Earth... ONLY 1-UP MUSHROOM!!!-á If You Like My Sig, Like Me! |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
112
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
Amazing! -á"Nerf it cause I can't fly it". I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Jita Alt666
571
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 21:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:
More ******** comments.
You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??
Here is the real tragedy: what passes for pvp in hi-sec involves only shooting ships that, as I've pointed out elsewhere, are nortorous for not having any guns fitted.
Sad.
But anyways, as per the ******** comment above, how long before the goons hit on that one and afk park a Tier III BC in every hi-sec belt in New-Eden?
Why don't you all grow a pair.
1. You need to utilise EFT to understand the complete range of options when fitting ships. Align and warp in excess of 20 seconds - fit in a manner that equates to an easy target. 2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space. 3. 800ish high sec systems. Average of 9 belts per system. 4500 alts on line at a time to cover belts. Would make a juicy wardec target - that would make it High Sec PVP.
|

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 22:10:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote: 2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space.
I know, pathetic, isn't it. I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 22:14:00 -
[37] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Desert Ice78 wrote:You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas?? Because if it's stupid but works, it's not stupid
Ok, jet-can mining stationary asteroids while constantly moving...... I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1630
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 22:40:00 -
[38] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:Ok, jet-can mining stationary asteroids while constantly moving......  So don't mine into a jet can, or have someone pick them up. The stationary nature of the asteroids isn't a problem. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 22:54:00 -
[39] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Desert Ice78 wrote:Ok, jet-can mining stationary asteroids while constantly moving......  So don't mine into a jet can, or have someone pick them up. The stationary nature of the asteroids isn't a problem.
You must be quite the mining God Tippia.....once you gave up ganking incursion guardians... I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1630
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 23:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:You must be quite the mining God Tippia.....once you gave up ganking incursion guardians... You've got the chronology a bit mixed up, but yes. I'm indeed a mining God (but more of the deist kind).
Fortunately, you don't need to be one to do what's being suggested. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Jita Alt666
571
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 23:06:00 -
[41] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote: 2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space.
I know, pathetic, isn't it.
It is only as pathetic as the people who know how and what occurs and choose to do no more than whine.
|

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 23:09:00 -
[42] - Quote
1-Up Mushroom wrote:Denidil wrote:bitters much wrote:Victim: Corp: Alliance: Faction: Destroyed: Iteron Mark III System: Inaro Security: 0.8 Damage Taken: 1668
Involved parties:
Name: Security: Corp: Alliance: None Faction: None Ship: Tempest Weapon: 1400mm Prototype I Siege Cannon Damage Done: 1668
Destroyed items:
Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2 Giant Secure Container (Cargo) Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)
So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ? http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11577648 Man the loot gods hate him
This, IMO, is exactly why insurance should have never changed.
A) Ganker is guaranteed to die and take a sec hit, due to infallible, unrealistic Concord. B) Target, on the other hand, is NOT guaranteed to die. C) If the target DOES die, its not guaranteed to drop anything.
Remove insurance - fine - but then NERF the evil loot gods - make all goodies drop!
|

Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
58
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 23:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
bitters much wrote:Victim: Corp: Alliance: Faction: Destroyed: Iteron Mark III System: Inaro Security: 0.8 Damage Taken: 1668
Involved parties:
Name: Security: Corp: Alliance: None Faction: None Ship: Tempest Weapon: 1400mm Prototype I Siege Cannon Damage Done: 1668
Destroyed items:
Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2 Giant Secure Container (Cargo) Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)
So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ?
Actually the OP thinks that these ships are going to be so cheap that players will use them to gank all the time.
A tempest may run a few mill more than one of these new BC's - they have battleship class price tags on them due to material costs (and it'll be a while until researched BPO's are done up).
CONCORD incidents won't pay insurance anymore so this composite will make these BC's even more costly losses than using an alpha Maelstrom to gank today.
If gankers are too cheap to fly heavy fit ships today, what the hell makes the OP think they'll be willing to cough up that much "per kill" AFTER these ships comes out? |

Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
191
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:01:00 -
[44] - Quote
Well thought out sentences! Punctuation!
Your level of education really impresses me. |

Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
191
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
Oh btw, the best part is that gankers drive the prices up, hence miners/producers get quite some money for them. ^^ |

Jojo Jackson
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:2. Ganking is a type of PVP.
Wrong, never was, never will be.
You ask why? Use your brain and you might get why.
Hint: doesn't matter if you shot a empty ship in space or and hauler with a Pilot, both have the same tools to defend them selve. - ALL T1 industrial ships are fail when it comes to fitting abilitys - no anti-cargoscan item which they can use -> FAIL balance - no anti-passive-targeter item -> FAIL balance
You know balance? It's easz stuff, ever tool must have it's anti tool! ECM <-> ECCM dampener <-> booster AB <-> web MWD <-> scrambler tracking comp <-> tracking disrupt THIS IS BALANCE!
Cool when you can fit oversizde largh shield extender even on fight-frigats but not on medium size hauler/miner hulls -> FAIL balance Cool when you can fit oversized 1600 plates on cruisers but not 400 plates on med size haulers/miners -> FAIL balance
I can understand, when industrials get no weapons ... but there is NO reason to not allow them propper tools to defend their goods!
All your childish problems with FW, 00, null are unimportant compared to this designe FAIL from CCP which must have highest priority to be fixed.
And just for you again: ganking is NO PvP! |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:23:00 -
[47] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Desert Ice78 wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote: 2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space.
I know, pathetic, isn't it. It is only as pathetic as the people who know how and what occurs and choose to do no more than whine.
Unless you remain docked indefinatly, you cannot, and never will be able to, prevent being ganked. Gankers will just use a bigger ship, or more ships or whatever.
This is of course despite all the ******** "solutions" that said (fail-wanna-be-carebear-pvper) gankers inevidably come up with to comfort themsleves from what they truely are:
Pathetic, that pvp for you is only shooting ships that never shoot back.
In short, you fail at Eve. I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Wacktopia
Sicarius. Legion of The Damned.
36
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:26:00 -
[48] - Quote
missbob wrote:sorry Handsome ******* i had ship longer than you played
You are, quite literally, a tool. |

Jojo Jackson
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote: stupid stuff
You deside to do a CRIME.
CONCORD catches you.
You REALY expect you should get anything at all???? Wow, that's hot .
Let's imagin: Someone make a bank robbery. Police catches him.
Police is so kind and says:" we got you but hey, noone cares, here is the money .... oh and sorry that we destroyed the car which you used for it ... let us buy you a new one".
ROFL ???
RLY ????
You my little wannabe rambo friend ... desever to get ... NOTHING! NO loot, NO insurence payout, NO refound of anything as soon as the police (CONCORD) kills you!
PS: I even go further. YOU should have to pay all the stuff that is lost! |

Jita Alt666
571
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:39:00 -
[50] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:Desert Ice78 wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote: 2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space.
I know, pathetic, isn't it. It is only as pathetic as the people who know how and what occurs and choose to do no more than whine. Unless you remain docked indefinatly, you cannot, and never will be able to, prevent being ganked. Gankers will just use a bigger ship, or more ships or whatever. This is of course despite all the ******** "solutions" that said (fail-wanna-be-carebear-pvper) gankers inevidably come up with to comfort themsleves from what they truely are: Pathetic, that pvp for you is only shooting ships that never shoot back. In short, you fail at Eve.
Hahaha. I like your shoot the messenger approach. I do not suicide gank. Like many things in Eve I have taken the time to learn ganking and therefore form an informed viewpoint.
I also very rarely come across gankers who wish to target my alts; don't transport items of extreme value, always fly what you can afford to lose, don't idle in stupid places, understand that by undocking you are consenting to be a target.
|

Majora Veneris
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:41:00 -
[51] - Quote
woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow i didn't think butthurt levels could BE this high.
first off, comparing EVE to RL=fail. regardless of what CCP says, EVE is NOT real. its a computer game.
Second, Ganking IS P(layer)V(ersus)P(layer) consentual or not, Its still 2 players in combat.
Finally, jeez i know when it comes to spelling i can be a complete and utter ****** some (most) of the time, but at least TRY. |

Dradius Calvantia
Creative Cookie Procuring Rote Kapelle
138
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:41:00 -
[52] - Quote
A new gank ship is indeed coming with the next patch, but it most certainly is not one of the new T3 cruisers.
Hint: It rhymes with masher. |

Jita Alt666
571
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:44:00 -
[53] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:2. Ganking is a type of PVP.
Wrong, never was, never will be. You ask why? Use your brain and you might get why. Hint: doesn't matter if you shot a empty ship in space or and hauler with a Pilot, both have the same tools to defend them selve. - ALL T1 industrial ships are fail when it comes to fitting abilitys - no anti-cargoscan item which they can use -> FAIL balance - no anti-passive-targeter item -> FAIL balance You know balance? It's easz stuff, ever tool must have it's anti tool! ECM <-> ECCM dampener <-> booster AB <-> web MWD <-> scrambler tracking comp <-> tracking disrupt THIS IS BALANCE!Cool when you can fit oversizde largh shield extender even on fight-frigats but not on medium size hauler/miner hulls -> FAIL balance Cool when you can fit oversized 1600 plates on cruisers but not 400 plates on med size haulers/miners -> FAIL balance I can understand, when industrials get no weapons ... but there is NO reason to not allow them propper tools to defend their goods! All your childish problems with FW, 00, null are unimportant compared to this designe FAIL from CCP which must have highest priority to be fixed. And just for you again: ganking is NO PvP!
PVP = player vs player. PVP=/= honourable fair player vs honourable fair player
While you can argue that players who seek to capitalise on an unbalanced mechanic are weak, you can not dispute the fact the ganking is a player vs player activity. |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:46:00 -
[54] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote: stupid stuff
You deside to do a CRIME. CONCORD catches you. You REALY expect you should get anything at all???? Wow, that's hot  . Let's imagin: Someone make a bank robbery. Police catches him. Police is so kind and says:" we got you but hey, noone cares, here is the money .... oh and sorry that we destroyed the car which you used for it ... let us buy you a new one". ROFL ??? RLY ???? You my little wannabe rambo friend ... desever to get ... NOTHING! NO loot, NO insurence payout, NO refound of anything as soon as the police (CONCORD) kills you! PS: I even go further. YOU should have to pay all the stuff that is lost!
Haha. Fail. for trying to use real life arguments. I'll cleverly use your argument against you. even if the mere act of expending the energy to reply to such stupidity is fail, in and of itself.
1. So I rig my car to selfdestruct with dynamite. Or I just smash it up with a crowbar. Then I walk down to the insurance company and get money. This happens in Eve.
2. So I buy a brand new Chevy Silverado, mount a .50 cal machine gun in the back and take it to Libya. It gets pwned by a mortar round, so I go to the insurance company and ask for money and get it. This happens in EVE.
Solution: Remove all insurance, as no insurance company would ever insure warships (or indeed, ANY ships) that are entering a warzone. And all of EVE is a warzone, highsec or not.
Interestingly, IRL, I can insure my vehicle for theft, yet if someone manages to steal my ship from a corp hangar, I get nothing.
TLDR; jojo jackson is an idiot, and I'm stupid for even bothering to refute his argument.
|

Jojo Jackson
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:52:00 -
[55] - Quote
Majora Veneris wrote:woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow i didn't think butthurt levels could BE this high. first off, comparing EVE to RL=fail. regardless of what CCP says, EVE is NOT real. its a computer game. Second, Ganking IS P(layer)V(ersus)P(layer) consentual or not, Its still 2 players in combat. Finally, jeez i know when it comes to spelling i can be a complete and utter ****** some (most) of the time, but at least TRY. So damn wrong.
It is NOT 2 players in combat as this would mean, BOTH can active act & re-act ... which is NOT the case! You have ONE who can act and another one who can do NOTHING as in most cases he don't even see what happens (loading screen/lag).
So as this is "just" a game it mean "**** off all fair play and all rules"? If I check this forum it's the "PvP comunity" which crys hardcore for "BALANCE" all the time.
But as it seams ... balance is just important if it favors your playstyle ... right?
And my spelling is fine as long as people understand the sense which they do. |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:53:00 -
[56] - Quote
If gankers are too cheap to fly heavy fit ships today, what the hell makes the OP think they'll be willing to cough up that much "per kill" AFTER these ships comes out?[/quote]
price of the new ship at Me 0 oracle=46.5mill not that good nage = 47.6mill not that good talos = 52.9mill good ship or is that goon ship tornado = 40.5mill ship of the day get some ME's on it you looking at 36mill ship
if your like
Alliance: HYDRA RELOADED
you use 2 Hurricane =52mill for the 2 and seeing the new BC puts out 3 time the dps of a tengu ganking is bad now when the new BC comes out it will get v.bad it be world of warcraft opps eve world of ganking |

Handsome Hussein
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 00:57:00 -
[57] - Quote
WARNING: THREAD REACHING MAXIMUM LEVELS OF BUTT-HURT, IDIOCY, AND LACK OF LANGUAGE SKILLS! Leaves only the fresh scent of pine. |

Jojo Jackson
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:01:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:PVP = player vs player.
And as it doesn't matter if the one side actual has a pilot at all (target) ... you can simply place a empty ship instead .... and with this it is NO PvP anymore.
IF you want to compare it with other activitys, then the one thing which comes closest is ..... Mining Active tools against not defending and not moving target
|

Majora Veneris
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:05:00 -
[59] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote: It is NOT 2 players in combat as this would mean, BOTH can active act & re-act ... which is NOT the case! You have ONE who can act and another one who can do NOTHING as in most cases he don't even see what happens (loading screen/lag).
So as this is "just" a game it mean "**** off all fair play and all rules"? If I check this forum it's the "PvP comunity" which crys hardcore for "BALANCE" all the time.
But as it seams ... balance is just important if it favors your playstyle ... right?
And my spelling is fine as long as people understand the sense which they do.
Cant believe im responding...again...but PVP is player vs player. says nothing about if each player wants the combat, nothing about fairness, ect. just PLAYER VS PLAYER. i think ganking qualifies as that.
as to the **** off fair play and the rules, what they are doing IS within the rules of the game. YOU may not like it, but it is indeed part of the game. suck it up and deal with it, or move on.
As far as balance favoring MY playstyle...well, ill say this. im a carebear...bigtime. got less than 10 kills to my name in all of 5 years of playing EVE. (with almost a year spent in null to boot, hah) So, does ganking favor my playstyle? nope. but its part of what makes EVE EVE. If im stupid enough to undock in a loot pinata Tengu/faction BS/whatever and not pay attention, i deserve to be on the receiving end of a bunch of 1400mm turrets. Without the threat of stupidly DIAF, what ive earned is meaningless. |

Jojo Jackson
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:08:00 -
[60] - Quote
Handsome ******* wrote:LACK OF LANGUAGE SKILLS! Just jung children and people without arguments try to TROLL about other peoples english.
BAD attampt. Get some arguments or shut up child.
|

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:11:00 -
[61] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:PVP = player vs player.
And as it doesn't matter if the one side actual has a pilot at all (target) ... you can simply place a empty ship instead .... and with this it is NO PvP anymore. IF you want to compare it with other activitys, then the one thing which comes closest is ..... Mining Active tools against not defending and not moving target
Oh, I don't know about that. I've had Hulks send Hobgoblin I's at me before. Funny when they attack you like that, even though the Hulk was dead in the first volley. Kind of like a corpse attacking you with its last death spasms. Even cancelled his killrights and saved me a sec status penalty. Sweet.
|

Jojo Jackson
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:11:00 -
[62] - Quote
Majora Veneris wrote:Cant believe im responding...again...but PVP is player vs player. says nothing about if each player wants the combat, nothing about fairness, ect. just PLAYER VS PLAYER. i think ganking qualifies as that.
Can't belive I had to explain it the 3 time.
Player vs Player REQUIRE that all involved partys (ganker AND victim) can do something at all. As soon, as it is equal, if one side is a player or not, it is NO Player vs Player anymore.
And as it is equal, if the target has a pilot or just an emtpy ship -> NO PvP
Simple fact.
PS: or just a MEGA FAIL balance ... the nifty thing YOU (PvP comunity) claim and cry for all day long at this forum! |

Handsome Hussein
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:13:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Handsome ******* wrote:LACK OF LANGUAGE SKILLS! Just jung children and people without arguments try to TROLL about other peoples english. BAD attampt. Get some arguments or shut up child. "Jung children"? I'm betting you're a troll. 3/10 for seriousness. Leaves only the fresh scent of pine. |

Handsome Hussein
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:16:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Player vs Player REQUIRE that all involved partys (ganker AND victim) can do something at all. As soon, as it is equal, if one side is a player or not, it is NO Player vs Player anymore. Confirming that AFK miners aren't actually players.
I guess that makes ganking PvE, then? Leaves only the fresh scent of pine. |

Jojo Jackson
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
Handsome ******* wrote:Jojo Jackson wrote:Handsome ******* wrote:LACK OF LANGUAGE SKILLS! Just jung children and people without arguments try to TROLL about other peoples english. BAD attampt. Get some arguments or shut up child. "Jung children"? I'm betting you're a troll. 3/10 for seriousness. 0/10
Even trolls like you should know, that most posters don't have english as first (any many times not even as second) language.
So either you are very young, very intolerant, very ignorant, very s.... not so clever *g* .... OR (which I belive) you just have no arguments and try hardcore to troll me.
well, fail attamp for trolling |

Handsome Hussein
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:20:00 -
[66] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Even trolls like you should know, that most posters don't have english as first (any many times not even as second) language.
So either you are very young, very intolerant, very ignorant, very s.... not so clever *g* .... OR (which I belive) you just have no arguments and try hardcore to troll me.
well, fail attamp for trolling You make me laugh, I'll give you a +1. Leaves only the fresh scent of pine. |

missbob
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:27:00 -
[67] - Quote
english is not my 1st language. bad english is thats y i do not post a lot and when you got player and all you do is troll you can see y |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:46:00 -
[68] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:
PVP = player vs player. PVP=/= honourable fair player vs honourable fair player
While you can argue that players who seek to capitalise on an unbalanced mechanic are weak, you can not dispute the fact the ganking is a player vs player activity.
Completely wrong. Arguing that ganking is PvP is what gankers use to comfort themselves. The premise of ganking is designed to preciesly NOT be pvp as it is exactly what the gankers are seaking to avoid.
Its pathetic because if any ganker even smells pvp they start running, and don't stop until they hit the docking point.
Edit: Just to qualify my post, I have flown with gankers, and I've listened to them on coms as they are "conducting their operations." I know when they are getting out of it, and I know how they think. I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Jita Alt666
571
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:52:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Majora Veneris wrote:Cant believe im responding...again...but PVP is player vs player. says nothing about if each player wants the combat, nothing about fairness, ect. just PLAYER VS PLAYER. i think ganking qualifies as that.
Can't belive I had to explain it the 3 time. Player vs Player REQUIRE that all involved partys (ganker AND victim) can do something at all. As soon, as it is equal, if one side is a player or not, it is NO Player vs Player anymore. And as it is equal, if the target has a pilot or just an emtpy ship -> NO PvP Simple fact. PS: or just a MEGA FAIL balance ... the nifty thing YOU (PvP comunity) claim and cry for all day long at this forum!
You are wrong. Player VS player requires nothing more than a character owned by a player attacks another character owned by another player. What skill level either player has, what actions either player does, what means to attack either player has, what means to defend either player has... ...all irrelevant. When a player activates an aggression module against another player PVP has occured.
You can try and explain it again if you like - it won't make you right. |

Krios Ahzek
Juvenis Iratus
144
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:55:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Jojo Jackson wrote:Majora Veneris wrote:Cant believe im responding...again...but PVP is player vs player. says nothing about if each player wants the combat, nothing about fairness, ect. just PLAYER VS PLAYER. i think ganking qualifies as that.
Can't belive I had to explain it the 3 time. Player vs Player REQUIRE that all involved partys (ganker AND victim) can do something at all. As soon, as it is equal, if one side is a player or not, it is NO Player vs Player anymore. And as it is equal, if the target has a pilot or just an emtpy ship -> NO PvP Simple fact. PS: or just a MEGA FAIL balance ... the nifty thing YOU (PvP comunity) claim and cry for all day long at this forum! You are wrong. Player VS player requires nothing more than a character owned by a player attacks another character owned by another player. What skill level either player has, what actions either player does, what means to attack either player has, what means to defend either player has... ...all irrelevant. When a player activates an aggression module against another player PVP has occured. You can try and explain it again if you like - it won't make you right.
no you see when you activate a module on an unwilling player he is instantly transmuted into a server-controlled robot
I live, I post, I slay. I am content. |

Jita Alt666
571
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 01:57:00 -
[71] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:
PVP = player vs player. PVP=/= honourable fair player vs honourable fair player
While you can argue that players who seek to capitalise on an unbalanced mechanic are weak, you can not dispute the fact the ganking is a player vs player activity.
Completely wrong. Arguing that ganking is PvP is what gankers use to comfort themselves. The premise of ganking is designed to preciesly NOT be pvp as it is exactly what the gankers are seaking to avoid. Its pathetic because if any ganker even smells pvp they start running, and don't stop until they hit the docking point. Edit: Just to qualify my post, I have flown with gankers, and I've listened to them on coms as they are "conducting their operations." I know when they are getting out of it, and I know how they think.
I agree gankers seek to avoid fair fights. Their actions are still against other players. Therefore it is player VS player (where the defender has no chance), it is still player versus player. You agree with me but refuse to see the crux.
|

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 02:04:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:
I agree gankers seek to avoid fair fights. Their actions are still against other players. Therefore it is player VS player (where the defender has no chance), it is still player versus player. You agree with me but refuse to see the crux.
No. A gank is not a fight. There is no fight. There is only gank.
Hence the name.
I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 03:37:00 -
[73] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:
I agree gankers seek to avoid fair fights. Their actions are still against other players. Therefore it is player VS player (where the defender has no chance), it is still player versus player. You agree with me but refuse to see the crux.
No. A gank is not a fight. There is no fight. There is only gank. Hence the name. A fight is an altercation between two individuals. Doesn't mean they both engage in aggression.
And ganking is PvP. A player is shooting at a player. The only exception to this is when ganking a bot. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 03:39:00 -
[74] - Quote
stop with semantics, why bother to try push for your own explanation when you perfectly know the one used. |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries Bloodbound.
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 04:23:00 -
[75] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote: A fight is an altercation between two individuals. Doesn't mean they both engage in aggression.
Yes it does, or else its not called a fight, its called a beating, or in Eve terms, ganking.
Corina Jarr wrote:
And ganking is PvP. A player is shooting at a player.
And that is why this is wrong. Sure is what a whole swade of people THINK passes for pvp, but isn't that why its so pathetic.
PvP is a fight.
Gank is a gank. I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 04:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
Krios Ahzek wrote:
no you see when you activate a module on an unwilling player he is instantly transmuted into a script
I changed something in your statement just to allow me to point one thing out.
We all acting on scripts, which has been created/learned. Except fear / which is actual biological script we are born with.
At least thats my theory on living creatures, specifically human-kind. |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
186
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 04:59:00 -
[77] - Quote
*yawn*
Yet another "we have new, big epeens now" thread.
CCP are successfully converting a sandbox into a garbage can.
Only Hobo's truly love the garbage can.
The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 04:59:00 -
[78] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Desert Ice78 wrote:You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas?? Because if it's stupid but works, it's not stupid. GǪand it works.
Well if you read past that, you will find out that this idea, works for the moment but is really stupid. It actually makes "suicide-gankers" a lot happier since they can abuse "miners" without sec. status hit and suicide to CONCORD.
Since some of them are in that business just to abuse, it makes things much easier for them.
So removing problem, by making those people have their fun without any drawbacks for them and with major drawback to the "Abused" party is not really clever is it? |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 05:32:00 -
[79] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:Corina Jarr wrote:I don't get what you are saying. Shouldn't you be claiming 0.0 is to hard for them cause they are whining men?
Anyway, there are plenty of ways to counter ganking. If a person chooses to have it easy, the gankers have it easy too.
Oh, btw a speed fit Retriever can speed tank the Talos. Not good for mining, but funny. Well loss of retriever isnt really such an down, And no you cant counter ganking except staying docked all the time. Or just be alligned at 3/4 max speed all the time and hit warp every time you see something coming on grid, which will result more fun for "gankers" without sec. hit and destroyed ship. Just warping among the roids watching everyone warps off..  Chances that you get ganked however are 1:5000 if we take number of people engaged in suicide ganking vs "high sec dwellers"
Yes, or unsub. Like most of the miners I know lol
Because loss of subs makes CCP rethink what they do. Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
186
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 05:45:00 -
[80] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Oh, I don't know about that. I've had Hulks send Hobgoblin I's at me before. Funny when they attack you like that, even though the Hulk was dead in the first volley. Kind of like a corpse attacking you with its last death spasms. Even cancelled his killrights and saved me a sec status penalty. Sweet.
If you're ganking, why on earth are you concerned about your security status ?
You don't outright say that you're concerned about it, but mentioning that is saved you a sec status penalty indicates some concern. Saves you the time you need to get your sec status back up ? That's the only logical conclusion I can come to.
The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 05:47:00 -
[81] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Oh, I don't know about that. I've had Hulks send Hobgoblin I's at me before. Funny when they attack you like that, even though the Hulk was dead in the first volley. Kind of like a corpse attacking you with its last death spasms. Even cancelled his killrights and saved me a sec status penalty. Sweet.
If you're ganking, why on earth are you concerned about your security status ? You don't outright say that you're concerned about it, but mentioning that is saved you a sec status penalty indicates some concern. Saves you the time you need to get your sec status back up ? That's the only logical conclusion I can come to.
Ill help:
Quote: OUTLAW LIFE - THE PARTY IS NOT OVER WHEN YOU HIT -5 People think that once you're -5 (or -3.5 or whatever) you need to stop ganking and rebuild your sec status. This is not the case. All you need to do is change your MO slightly and you can continue to gank away forever. This is actually one of the most fun parts of ganking, as you throw brutix after brutix at miners and just don't give a ****.
Most people think you're done ganking once your sec status gets too low. This is not the case.
When you hit -5 (actually anywhere from -3.5 to -4.5 depending on what system you're in), things do change. About 6 seconds after you enter any grid when you are in a ship, faction police warp in to start shooting you. This includes when you're in a POS: faction police shoot through shields, just like CONCORD. This means you can no longer idle in space waiting to line up your gank. It doesn't mean you can't gank though: once you get the hang of it it's almost as easy (and more exciting: got to run from the po-po) than standard ganking.
Important things to keep in mind with the police: 1)Police jam. Weakly (5 strength) but it's there. If you get jammed during a gank, you flubbed it: fit and overheat appropriate ECCM IIs. However they're not like CONCORD: when they're on the field the gank is not over. 2)Police web, then scram. This means if they land on grid while you're aligning for warp, don't panic. However, this means you better have already started warp. 3)Police get there sooner than CONCORD. This means you need to fit a tank: you have to survive the police until CONCORD gets there. This means fit a DCII at a minimum.
The basic procedure for ganking while -5 is this:
First, you don't have the margin for error you usually do. You need a tank, and you can't set up your gank perfectly. That means you need some overkill: use a brutix instead of a thorax.
To begin, fit and insure the ship in station with your ganker. Then, TRADE (not contract: contracting voids insurance) the ship to an alt. This alt needs to either fly an Orca or be able to online all of the modules (at once - if your fit is tight on PG giving it to your alt may offline a gun). This alt flies the ship out to the pos, where it loads it into the SMA or leaves it floating in space. Undock your ganker in a pod, warp to the ship. DO NOT BOARD IT UNTIL YOU HAVE A GANK LINED UP.
Line up your gank as usual: find an oblivious mackinaw and sit next to it.
Now, board your ship and mash warp: this needs to be the FIRST thing you do. While in warp, set up your guns, tp, scram on the top row. Activate your sensor booster, overheat and activate your ECCM (just overheat both top and mid rows entirely) and then prime your guns/tp/scram. The instant you land, start locking and hit stop, launch drones. As soon as you lock, fire, then tell your drones to agress. If you're in a brutix, like you should be, you should crush them, as long as you don't get jammed (12% chance with an overheated ECCM II).
If you have an ECCM you'll still get jammed 12% of the time, nothing you can do about it (besides getting more ECCM or implants).
Also note: you're a pirate, people can pod you. They may: don't stick around after a gank. Your implants are worth more than the loot: tell your ganker to dock first then switch to your alt and scoop the loot. One idea we've batted around is set your atutopilot to one system over: when concord shows up, turn it on. Your pod should warp out as soon as your ship dies.
The best ship for -5 ganking is Mittani's Ragebrutix: Highs: Anode neutrons/neutron IIs x7 Mids: 1 target painter, 1 warp disruptor, 2 ECCM II Lows: 4x magstabs, 1x DCII.
This gives you a 6% chance of being jammed, and the DCII lets you finish a gank even when the faction police show up instantly.
Mittani's hard-won lessons from being -5 and getting chased around all day by the faction po-po 1. Don't **** around with Thoraxes below -5. The po-po can kill you before you get your shots off, even with a dcII. Using a Brutix (with a DCII) you can mostly ignore them.
2. Always have combat logging enabled and open during ganks so you can diagnose what went wrong - and something ~will~ go wrong as you adjust to the police.
3. Use a sensor booster with a locktime script on your brutix. You need to lock and fire on a barge quickly due to the police. This wasn't necessary before piracy.
4. Barge-only overview setting for your pirate. The less **** to misclick on during a gank attempt, the fewer flubbed ganks.
5. Some kind of Concord-clearing method - either hop into a stored velator from the GSF pos's SMA while you have a countdown aggro (very pro trick, thanks Kismeteer!) or have a throwaway alt in a velator zot an anchored GSC in one of the belts. Nothing is as frustrating as Concord guarding faggots in belts.
6. It doesn't matter much if the faction police are already in your target belt. They'll instawarp to you and begin shooting you, but you mostly don't care because you're in a Brutix now.
7. It's always better to spend the isk on t2 damage modules than deal with the shame of a flubbed gank because you tried to save a few million isk. ...more
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 05:48:00 -
[82] - Quote
Quote:8. Before piracy, I would lazily launch my drones before trying to lock prey. This is verrrry bad as a pirate, as seconds count. Activate ******* everything while in warp. While spamming lock and approach, launch your drones, click the concord butan, and mash your drone engage hotkey (you DO have a drone engage hotkey right? go make one). as a brutix most of your dps comes from blaster facefucking so drones are helpful but not key like with a thorax
9. drones engage hotkey ************
Hope it helps :D Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
230

|
Posted - 2011.11.25 17:40:00 -
[83] - Quote
Please do not create multiple threads about the same topic, thank you.
Thread locked. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |