EVE Search - War for Insmother

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

War for Insmother

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
GirlScout	Posted - 2006.07.25 12:46:00 - [61] Originally by: Papa Digger Yeah, we are using ALARM CLOCK!! Right, thats an exploit. :)
Nebba Kenezzer Minmatar	Posted - 2006.07.25 12:57:00 - [62] Originally by: Amthrianius lol, this is funny So is your face, you big meanie! Nebba - The Vocal Majority
nync UA Industry Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:01:00 - [63] Originally by: Papa Digger Originally by: KilleR 004 Originally by: RCI DeXTeR[/quote ... we are cheaters and users of exploits at least they admit it Yeah, we are using ALARM CLOCK!! My mobile failed to wake me up this morning
HatePeace LoveWar Amarr	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:17:00 - [64] Originally by: nync Originally by: Papa Digger Originally by: KilleR 004 Originally by: RCI DeXTeR[/quote ... we are cheaters and users of exploits at least they admit it Yeah, we are using ALARM CLOCK!! My mobile failed to wake me up this morning Mine did, but i turned it off cos u gits kept me up till 5am. :P Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 bytes, ty - Cortes
Nebba Kenezzer Minmatar	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:18:00 - [65] Bring on the innovation! Fighting RA is making me one of the best pilots in game. Thanks RA! Hugs and kisses, A Satisfied Enemy Nebba - The Vocal Majority
SenseOfHumorLOL	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:25:00 - [66] Nebba you still have a BoB sig on. SPY!!!!!!
exploer	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:33:00 - [67] Originally by: Nebba Kenezzer Bring on the innovation! Fighting RA is making me one of the best pilots in game. Thanks RA! Hugs and kisses, A Satisfied Enemy Post with your main Kiatolon
Komolov Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:34:00 - [68] Originally by: The Judge Shame that the system is attacked when all the europeans are asleep. Shame that RA pilots are still able to log into this game. It is obvious exploit and CCP should do something with that ASAP. --------------------
Komolov Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:43:00 - [69] Edited by: Komolov on 25/07/2006 13:44:03 Originally by: She Storm As for the fleet fight , yes it was a VERY GOOD FIGHT, RA had about 40 ships, about 35 or so were T2 BS, we had about the same number 16 of which were BS the rest were support cruisers and frigates. you did not kill all support as you state because 18 to 20 of us retreated and formed up in f2a to repair, and figure a strategy. Let me correct your corrections (sorry for doing this but...) RA gang had 25 BS Your gang had 26 BS I'm not going to look after all your downed ships but judging by familiar pilots' names you had a lot of T2 BS in gang too. --------------------
exploer	Posted - 2006.07.25 13:56:00 - [70] If your gang was killed by Red Allaince - send SMS on the number 456780 with the name of system and a short story 'bout it and you will get a dummy as a gift. If your story will be good enough - we'll send you a diaper.
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.07.25 14:00:00 - [71] ROTF Great sence of humor! Papa Digger and Explorer are the best!
exploer	Posted - 2006.07.25 14:14:00 - [72] Originally by: Obivan Efa ROTF Great sence of humor! Papa Digger and Explorer are the best! Post with your main.

Petwraith	Posted - 2006.07.25 15:04:00 - [73] Please stay IC and refrain from flaming and trolling. --- If it ain't orange, it ain't offical!

Snowcats	Posted - 2006.07.25 15:07:00 - [74] hi :)
Uther Doull Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.25 15:10:00 - [75] Originally by: Petwraith Please stay IC and refrain from flaming and trolling. this is the bloody discussions, not summit forum...
aimez	Posted - 2006.07.25 15:10:00 - [76] I killed 2 angel generals yesterday, world please congratz me? Just kidding, it was a nice fight, i enjoyed it :* Will try to write a short story about what hapened When the batle started the situation was like this 17 coalition bs on the mj- gate in z0- camping 26 red alliance bs on the z0- gate in mj- No bubles present, 1 ra interdictor 5 coalition pilots in a SS in mj- Red Alliance jumped into z0- at the batle started Coalition knew we had less numbers but we had more ecm (one more scorp and maybe one more bb but not sure) and the adtanvage of ra jumping onto our camp made it a fair fight i think primairy's called secundairy's called people went down and people warped out/in again batle went on for quite a while, dont know exact time it took, other coalition batleships/support joined the ones fighting Red alliance gave a very good fight, i think the reason they won is the lack of bubles to keep the whole ra fleet stuck at one spot :* Just one friendly request stop with the convoing the enemy/crap like that before a batle starts, i know you guy's prolly just wanted a nice conversations and i am truly sorry if i offended you by rejecting it but it is kinda lame imo beside that thanks for the batle ^^
Sarmaul 0utbreak	Posted - 2006.07.25 15:25:00 - [77] Originally by: Uther Doull Originally by: Petwraith Please stay IC and refrain from flaming and trolling. this is the bloody discussions, not summit forum... ^ what he said TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS - In Rust We Trust -
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.25 16:16:00 - [78] Edited by: Jaabaa Prime on 25/07/2006 16:22:35 Originally by: Sarmaul Originally by: Uther Doull Originally by: Petwraith Please stay IC and refrain from flaming and trolling. this is the bloody discussions, not summit forum... ^ what he said Yepp kieron says: Quote: This is an out of character forum for discussing corporations, alliances, fansites and other organizations. ----------------------- Anyways, the only thing that the Red Allaince are really any good at is spamming POSs and recharging their shields in the morning using Capital Shield Transporters and then refilling them up with strontium again. I doubt that RA would survive a week if CCP were to implement my suggested change to POS warfare. Then they would HAVE to stand a fight for their POSs instead of just refueling the things. I used to have enormous respect for "The Russians" while we were both in CA, those days they would actually fight evenly matched odds and not just snipe and gank. I know, long time ago, but they have changed so much it's not even funny. To give you a little insight (in case your spies haven't already infomred you), during the weekend the coalition put all 10 of RA's large POSs into reinforced mode in a single evening. Did they show up ? Nope. They just micro-managed the strontium reserves so that the POSs would come out of reinforced mode in the morning where most of the euros are working and most of the americans are asleep. What a way to fight, taking a station that way is just plain lame. They have been doing this for the past week by the way. And due to CCPs addition of Dreads and Carriers, you can camp a system for ever and they can still refuel a POS. Woot, aren't we all so proud of RA's might. CCP should at least stop POSs from being shield recharged, then an aggressor at least stands a fighting chance. But TBH, as it stands, a few carrier and dread pilots can make a mockery of hundreds of very frustrated players because of the current game mechanics. We're all up for a good fight over territory, but it would appear that RA don't have the balls, they are happy putting up POSs and using a timezone advantage along with capital shield transporters. A real fun way to play EVE I do say. Disclaimer: These are my personal views, and I do not represent LV -- Mini Skill Planner
Zimi Vlasic F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2006.07.25 16:27:00 - [79] Originally by: Petwraith Please stay IC and refrain from flaming and trolling. WRONG FREAKING FORUM. This isn't the IC forum. You're looking for the link above this.
exploer Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.25 16:39:00 - [80] Originally by: Jaabaa Prime Edited by: Jaabaa Prime on 25/07/2006 16:22:35 Originally by: Sarmaul Originally by: Uther Doull Originally by: Petwraith Please stay IC and refrain from flaming and trolling. this is the bloody discussions, not summit forum... ^ what he said Yepp kieron says: Quote: This is an out of character forum for discussing corporations, alliances, fansites and other organizations. ----------------------- Anyways, the only thing that the Red Allaince are really any good at is spamming POSs and recharging their shields in the morning using Capital Shield Transporters and then refilling them up with strontium again. I doubt that RA would survive a week if CCP were to implement my suggested change to POS warfare. Then they would HAVE to stand a fight for their POSs instead of just refueling the things. I used to have enormous respect for "The Russians" while we were both in CA, those days they would actually fight evenly matched odds and not just snipe and gank. I know, long time ago, but they have changed so much it's not even funny. To give you a little insight (in case your spies haven't already infomred you), during the weekend the coalition put all 10 of RA's large POSs into reinforced mode in a single evening. Did they show up ? Nope. They just micro-managed the strontium reserves so that the POSs would come out of reinforced mode in the morning where most of the euros are working and most of the americans are asleep. What a way to fight, taking a station that way is just plain lame. They have been doing this for the past week by the way. And due to CCPs addition of Dreads and Carriers, you can camp a system for ever and they can still refuel a POS. Woot, aren't we all so proud of RA's might. CCP should at least stop POSs from being shield recharged, then an aggressor at least stands a fighting chance. But TBH, as it stands, a few carrier and dread pilots can make a mockery of hundreds of very frustrated players because of the current game mechanics. We're all up for a good fight over territory, but it would appear that RA don't have the balls, they are happy putting up POSs and using a timezone advantage along with capital shield transporters. A real fun way to play EVE I do say. Disclaimer: These are my personal views, and I do not represent LV stop crying! RA is not your mommy
Pepperami Art of War Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.07.25 16:45:00 - [81] lol this thread has been butchered. [Art of War][- V -]
Daroh Solar Dragons Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.07.25 17:14:00 - [82] Edited by: Daroh on 25/07/2006 17:15:17 You think that lame tactics are refueling and using shield transporters, we think that lame tactics is blobing. You cant win for now coz we use game mechanics very good, we use all aspects of the game - logistics, capital fleet, gank squads, bs fleets etc, and you cant find any tactics against ours. May be its not becouse of bad game mechanics? May be its coz you just cant turn your brains on and think some? For you would be better to ask Devs to change mechanics to your advantage...anyway we will find better tactics and you will start post on forum that you "cant win them coz they use their brains". You came for fun with huge blob? lol. Come with equal numbers and dont try to take our stations. And you will get the fun. Or you think that fights 5:1 must be fun for us? and hm....should we ask Devs to do smthing with blobs?
ArcheryTXS Russian SOBR Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.07.25 17:17:00 - [83] Edited by: ArcheryTXS on 25/07/2006 17:27:05 Originally by: Jaabaa Prime Edited by: Jaabaa Prime on 25/07/2006 16:22:35 ----------------------- Anyways, the only thing that the Red Allaince are really any good at is spamming POSs and recharging their shields in the morning using Capital Shield Transporters and then refilling them up with strontium again. I doubt that RA would survive a week if CCP were to implement my suggested change to POS warfare. Then they would HAVE to stand a fight for their POSs instead of just refueling the things. I used to have enormous respect for "The Russians" while we were both in CA, those days they would actually fight evenly matched odds and not just snipe and gank. I know, long time ago, but they have changed so much it's not even funny. To give you a little insight (in case your spies haven't already infomred you), during the weekend the coalition put all 10 of RA's large POSs into reinforced mode in a single evening. Did they show up ? Nope. They just micro-managed the strontium reserves so that the POSs would come out of reinforced mode in the morning where most of the euros are working and most of the americans are asleep. What a way to fight, taking a station that way is just plain lame. They have been doing this for the past week by the way. And due to CCPs addition of Dreads and Carriers, you can camp a system for ever and they can still refuel a POS. Woot, aren't we all so proud of RA's might. CCP should at least stop POSs from being shield recharged, then an aggressor at least stands a fighting chance. But TBH, as it stands, a few carrier and dread pilots can make a mockery of hundreds of very frustrated players because of the current game mechanics. We're all up for a good fight over territory, but it would appear that RA don't have the balls, they are happy putting up POSs and using a timezone advantage along with capital shield transporters. A real fun way to play EVE I do say. Disclaimer: These are my personal views, and I do not represent LV Jaabaa - cry me a river bebe =) / City Sadness...
Vashi Dokumentu The xDEATHx Squadron	Posted - 2006.07.25 17:34:00 - [84] Originally by: Jaabaa Prime Edited by: Jaabaa Prime on 25/07/2006 16:22:35 Originally by: Sarmaul Originally by: Uther Doull Originally by: Petwraith Please stay IC and refrain from flaming and trolling. this is the bloody discussions, not summit forum... ^ what he said Yepp kieron says: Quote: This is an out of character forum for discussing corporations, alliances, fansites and other organizations. ----------------------- Anyways, the only thing that the Red Allaince are really any good at is spamming POSs and recharging their shields in the morning using Capital Shield Transporters and then refilling them up with strontium again. I doubt that RA would survive a week if CCP were to implement my suggested change to POS warfare. Then they would HAVE to stand a fight for their POSs instead of just refueling the things. I used to have enormous respect for "The Russians" while we were both in CA, those days they would actually fight evenly matched odds and not just snipe and gank. I know, long time ago, but they have changed so much it's not even funny. To give you a little insight (in case your spies haven't already infomred you), during the weekend the coalition put all 10 of RA's large POSs into reinforced mode in a single evening. Did they show up ? Nope. They just micro-managed the strontium reserves so that the POSs would come out of reinforced mode in the morning where most of the euros are working and most of the americans are asleep. What a way to fight, taking a station that way is just plain lame. They have been doing this for the past week by the way. And due to CCPs addition of Dreads and Carriers, you can camp a system for ever and they can still refuel a POS. Woot, aren't we all so proud of RA's might. CCP should at least stop POSs from being shield recharged, then an aggressor at least stands a fighting chance. But TBH, as it stands, a few carrier and dread pilots can make a mockery of hundreds of very frustrated players because of the current game mechanics. We're all up for a good fight over territory, but it would appear that RA don't have the balls, they are happy putting up POSs and using a timezone advantage along with capital shield transporters. A real fun way to play EVE I do say. Disclaimer: These are my personal views, and I do not represent LV U had a lot of respect from me, from those days in xCA, but it`s just drops by what you posted......sad to see, what we`re all changing....
Pepperami Art of War Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.07.25 17:45:00 - [85] Originally by: Daroh Edited by: Daroh on 25/07/2006 17:15:17 You think that lame tactics are refueling and using shield transporters, we think that lame tactics is blobing. You cant win for now coz we use game mechanics very good, we use all aspects of the game - logistics, capital fleet, gank squads, bs fleets etc, and you cant find any tactics against ours. May be its not becouse of bad game mechanics? Well, I agree that generally RA have stepped up their tactics, especially with regards to bold use of capital ships, good move there. As for arguing about blob size, RA used to only engage with 50%+ extra pilots. Unfortunately, you no longer have the numbers. So not a very good come back there I do personally think the game mechanics do need changing, not because of how they're used by either side, but because they encourage boring gameplay. I'm yet to see the phrase "<3 pos warfare"... Except maybe when a t2 fitted bs, or a hauler with elite frigs, accidently warps to a moon in 1V-. I think POS warefare is one of the first times that EVE has made it harder to be the attacker, which is actually a good thing; but I think it's gone too far. I think one thing that could improve things is make dreads in siegemode much more effective at pvp so a capital fleet assaulting a pos is actually semi-competant when enemies turn up. Dreads came heavily pre-nerfed as I believe Oveur said.. So unnerf them a little ;) [Art of War][- V -]
Miss Overlord	Posted - 2006.07.25 17:48:00 - [86] i think that the coalation needs to bypass this system if they can and strike deeper into RA territory (heck even hire some mercs or pirates to snipe away at some of their deeper assets and hit their miners etc)
Jaabaa Prime Dental Drilling Corporation Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.25 18:11:00 - [87] Originally by: Miss Overlord i think that the coalation needs to bypass this system if they can and strike deeper into RA territory (heck even hire some mercs or pirates to snipe away at some of their deeper assets and hit their miners etc) The heart of what territory ? Oh, you mean C-J and F2A ? We are already there -- Mini Skill Planner
Ivan Stang	Posted - 2006.07.25 18:13:00 - [88] Originally by: Pepperami I do personally think the game mechanics do need changing, not because of how they're used by either side, but because they encourage boring gameplay. I'm yet to see the phrase "<3 pos warfare" Noone is forcing you guys to engage in POS warfare in the first place. If it bores you that much, don't do it? Pretty simple if you ask me. Problem is, you've backed yourselves into a corner by constantly declaring your desire to "remove RA from the South." I've seen people from the "Coalition" claim numerous times that Insmother was "unused" and that noone on your side cares about that region. So why fight for it? You don't have to have a NAP, you can agree to respect each others territorial integrity and borders and just have fleet fights if that's what you want (and you all claim to want that). Even if you could remove RA from the South, then who would you fight? Bottom line is, if POS wars are boring, don't fight one.
LWMaverick	Posted - 2006.07.25 18:34:00 - [89] Originally by: Daroh Edited by: Daroh on 25/07/2006 17:15:17 we think that lame tactics is blobing. I find this EXTREMLY ironic. Poverty
Raste Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.25 18:34:00 - [90] gf

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.