| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad
Dirt Nap Squad.
1074
   |
Posted - 2011.11.23 16:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Please discuss issues related to this session in this thread. We look forward to your comments and suggestions.
CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |
Solo Player
78
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 20:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
EVE economy should be more than the supply and demand of a couple thousand capsuleers and the completely independent, static and completely implausible system of NPC trade goods.
Have world-changing events like wars and incursions as well as the needs and wishes of billions of people on planets reflect on the market. |
Di Mulle
24
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 21:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Solo Player wrote:EVE economy should be more than the supply and demand of a couple thousand capsuleers and the completely independent, static and completely implausible system of NPC trade goods.
Have world-changing events like wars and incursions as well as the needs and wishes of billions of people on planets reflect on the market.
Laughable logic, sorry. Probably caused by a wish to over dramatize 
Unless you will find billions of real players wishing to play and personify those "needs and wishes of billions of people on planets" they will be exactly that - NPC goods. Oh, and we already have them.
According to you "world-changing events like wars and incursions " will be purely NPC stuff as well - couple thousand players can't implement all that on their own.
And, btw, if there are couple thousand capsuleers, it is time to shut down servers and discuss one thing only - where to have a RIP party.
CCP is unable to implement simpliest things. Like settting to hide signatures. So they sweep it under a rug . Children do that in their pre-shool years, CCP does it being adults. Probably because it is fearless enough. |
Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order
Fidelas Constans
163
|
Posted - 2011.11.23 23:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Solo Player wrote:EVE economy should be more than the supply and demand of a couple thousand capsuleers and the completely independent, static and completely implausible system of NPC trade goods.
Have world-changing events like wars and incursions as well as the needs and wishes of billions of people on planets reflect on the market.
1) Wrong thread.
2) The economy should be more than a RNG and a bunch of algorithms people will figure out within a month after release. The economy should be based on the supply and demand of real people, and world-changing events like wars (and I don't mean Amarr/Minmatar wars) and invasions, as well as the needs and wishes of hundreds of thousands of real people.
Oh wait, it actually is. |
Bomberlocks
CTRL-Q
59
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 01:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tell them they're on the right road, but that they have to tread, very, very carefully to avoid more drama in future. |
StukaBee
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 08:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bomberlocks wrote:Tell them they're on the right road, but that they have to tread, very, very carefully to avoid more drama in future.
Crucible is a step in the right direction, the next two or three expansions will be critical. There are various issues harming the Eve environment that have been allowed to take root over years and have never been tackled because CCP has been distracted by other projects. We could all reel off the list, we all know what they are, and we've all waited in vain for years hoping something might finally be done about them.
CCP's priorities for the forseeable future need to be using the next few expansion cycles to examine every aspect of Eve to see where improvements can be made and tackling them head on, every time bringing in more of the Thousand Little Things and a couple of Really Big Things as well. |
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
152
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 20:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ask them how it felt to be *****-slapped by their customer base with such force that they did an about face!
And please, make them understand that the requirement of better communication extends beyond their comfort zone, they have improved but they tend to turtle when something they say is hammered .. as in a blurp or two in a thread resulting in an outcry and then absolute silence on the topic as a whole, it is the raison d'etre of community management hires. |
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 23:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
I don't think the CSM should be rubbing CCPs nose in the fact they did an about face to refocus on spaceships, they should be praised for that, CCP made the right choice...and better late than never. But the refocus on core gameplay with crucible needs to CCPs new long term focus, not something done once to take the heat off them.
They need to keep improving their communication with players, an example of good communications would be Matt Higby over at Sony for the upcoming Planetside2.
On the whole they need to be very open and transparent on their plans for EVE in terms of direction and intent. There's a lot of long outstanding issues with EVE that they need to address rather than continued to be brushed under the rug. Issues that in many cases CCP will have to choose between diametrically opposed player group interests. Clarity and foreknowledge of where EVE is heading is better for all concerned than continued ambiguity. Key to this CCP needs to decide what kind game EVE is, because sometimes I don't think they know or have decided yet. |
Daneb Christofph
Red Fleet Corp
RED.OverLord
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.30 11:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
Against the backdrop of the great changes (in the best side) in many areas that we've seen in recent times, but we want take attention of Senior Staff to problems with Customer Support team.
Now anyone GM will ask: "What else is on? How can I help you? Quality of support in recent months is improving, the average response time for the petition is reduced, and evaluation of customer satisfaction is constantly increasing. This we will report periodically to Hilmar in our reports and write about it on the forums ...GÇ¥
Unfortunately, our (not yours) history logs show that:
- petition of us refuse to escalate the level of Senior GMs;
- the petition may be closed without a final word GMs;
- in petition GM can write the answer without showing his signature;
- we are faced with the complete incompetence of GMs with complex and unusual situations.
All my conversation history with GMs according my problem I sent to CSM6GÇÖsmember.
EVE - one of the best online game right now. Now we canGÇÖt say this about the Customer Support. Please, talk about this at the summit. |
Gevlin
SMANews.net
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.30 23:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
-->Please continue with the directive that made PI "reducing NPC built stuff and putting into the hands of the players" Nex store seemed to be a step in the opposite direction. Is it possible to Adjust Nex to it follows with this directive.
-->Adding to the current features to make the current feature fresh which in turn invigorate the players: more FW elements, more Sov elements, More PI elements, More Scanning down resource elements. These will customers happy.
-->Remember in physiologic class - when there was the study when the levels of light changed at the work place productivity increased. Not because the light levels mattered but because some one attempting to make things better for the worker.
CCP will find even by tweaking things in response 1 way one month and then the other way in response CCP will be seen as catering to the players whims and making many of the vocal minority happy.
-->Even though Incarna is on the back burner it is possible to include the mechanics of some of the features such as store front mechanics be accessible to the station interface and move to them incarna interface once in the station multiplayer portion is established. This will Giving eve players FIS features provided by incarna, battle test them, so they can slot back in easily into incarna when its multiplayer portion comes out. This should soft sell the the benefits Incarna promising increased functionality and ease of use.
-->I appreciate the work you guys are doing. You are in a high stress field that provides low pay. It is a highly competitive field as everyone and their dog think they can produce in game design.
I agree with several people: CCP needs to focus most of eve's recources on FIS, but the development of WIS still needs to continue, just as a slower and more efficient pace.
In eve I wish to be more than just a machine. |
|
|
Myxx
Atropos Group
153
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
japaneese players are rightfully ******* worried about the use of nexon in april. ccp seems shortsighted on it from both security and trust issues with them. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |