Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
869
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 04:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'm just wondering if my understanding is off or if there is a bug going on. Sense Hyperion, my wh has had no sites spawn except other wormholes. I have anomalies, but no sigs. So i'm curious if its just me and i'm misunderstanding the respawn rate of a C5, or if others are seeing the same thing. (granted my sites could be picked clean but travelers before i get off work, but still figured i'd ask) OMG Comet Mining idea!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=331766 |

Winthorp
2659
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 04:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Perhaps people in your region have just not run many since Hyperion and the pool of sites that have been run have gone to others in your region...
RNG is what it is. |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
869
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 04:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Perhaps people in your region have just not run many since Hyperion and the pool of sites that have been run have gone to others in your region...
RNG is what it is.
ah yea i did not think of that.. hmm OMG Comet Mining idea!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=331766 |

Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 12:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
We have not seen any new sites spawn recently, either. Seems odd as the same three have been there, so no visitors took them. |

corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
665
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 12:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
This could well be a knock on effect of all the hyperion changes. with it making it alotless safe to run sites people arent and so no new sites are spawning.
I've been chatting to CCP Fozzie about numbers for various things and hopefully after a week or so we might see some changes, we may have to wait a bit longer mind for things to take effect though.
But iam looking in to this and your not the first people to notice this either. Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |

Winthorp
2660
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 12:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
corbexx wrote:This could well be a knock on effect of all the hyperion changes. with it making it alotless safe to run sites people arent and so no new sites are spawning.
I've been chatting to CCP Fozzie about numbers for various things and hopefully after a week or so we might see some changes, we may have to wait a bit longer mind for things to take effect though.
But iam looking in to this and your not the first people to notice this either.
I sure hope they don't magic buff the site spawn pool or % upwards as a kneejerk reaction to less sites and in a few months when everything has settled down to a natural equilibrium forget about adjusting things downward again.
I would be concerned that a few weeks of post patch data is not enough to change things. |

corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
665
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 13:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:corbexx wrote:This could well be a knock on effect of all the hyperion changes. with it making it alotless safe to run sites people arent and so no new sites are spawning.
I've been chatting to CCP Fozzie about numbers for various things and hopefully after a week or so we might see some changes, we may have to wait a bit longer mind for things to take effect though.
But iam looking in to this and your not the first people to notice this either. I sure hope they don't magic buff the site spawn pool or % upwards as a kneejerk reaction to less sites and in a few months when everything has settled down to a natural equilibrium forget about adjusting things downward again. I would be concerned that a few weeks of post patch data is not enough to change things.
aye agree.
although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out.
need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage. Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |

epicurus ataraxia
Lazerhawks
1167
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 15:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Winthorp wrote:corbexx wrote:This could well be a knock on effect of all the hyperion changes. with it making it alotless safe to run sites people arent and so no new sites are spawning.
I've been chatting to CCP Fozzie about numbers for various things and hopefully after a week or so we might see some changes, we may have to wait a bit longer mind for things to take effect though.
But iam looking in to this and your not the first people to notice this either. I sure hope they don't magic buff the site spawn pool or % upwards as a kneejerk reaction to less sites and in a few months when everything has settled down to a natural equilibrium forget about adjusting things downward again. I would be concerned that a few weeks of post patch data is not enough to change things. aye agree. although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out. need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage.
Your worries are shared, people who leave WH space or let their game time expire, are lost forever in most cases.
It's no good CCP saying an hour after they have gone, "good news, we are doing X as our metrics showed whatever" they will no longer be listening. There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE |

Maduin Shi
Perkone Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 16:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
corbexx wrote:
aye agree.
although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out.
need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage.
It could be symptomatic of a big drop in WH groups farming their static connections, since its now a lot harder to secure an inactive static. "Parking lot" wormhole systems may be becoming a bigger problem. |

Keith Planck
Lazerhawks
906
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 17:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
You could just give anoms a timer so they disappear regardless of being run, im thinking longer then 4 days but shorter then it is now if there is one. "Jack Miton liked your forum post:" |
|

Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 17:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
You guys seem to know something about the mechanics behind sites spawning. Are there a certain number of sites (or spawn rate) shared across a region of space? Does that explain why my C4 gets 1-2 sites a day (typically; it's zero since the patch), but others talk about having new sites spawn in their systems more frequently?
corbexx wrote:need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage. Everyone in my corp took their mains to K-space even before we realized this was a thing. That's not unusual for us, we go back and forth sometimes, but our pilots won't come back until there is content. I hope CCP doesn't sit on their hands and ignore this anom spawn thing.
I'm not saying the sky is falling. We have fuel for months. We just didn't see a reason to be in W-space right now, given the dramatically increased risk and no sites to farm. |

Maduin Shi
Perkone Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 18:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
Pro TIps wrote:You guys seem to know something about the mechanics behind sites spawning. Are there a certain number of sites (or spawn rate) shared across a region of space? Does that explain why my C4 gets 1-2 sites a day (typically; it's zero since the patch), but others talk about having new sites spawn in their systems more frequently?
There's a "pool" of sites that are shared by... a given constellation or region of w-space I forget which. Though the meaning of those terms is sort of lost given how w-space works. But if you run a site, it will respawn in some other w-space system that TQ associates with your constellation/region.
w-space systems where nobody lives and are hard to access will accumulate more and more anoms/sigs over time because nobody is warping to them or running them. I think there's a de-spawn timer on sites even if there is no player interaction with them but its pretty long, perhaps a week or more. Anyway these empty/inaccessible systems become "parking lots" for anoms/sigs.
You'll occasionally get a connection to one of these systems with a huge number of sites, but if you don't farm them or warp to them then they stay there and they will take far longer to cycle and respawn in your home system or elsewhere.
If I got any of this wrong, someone correct me pls. Thx :) |

Angsty Teenager
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
553
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 19:14:00 -
[13] - Quote
SURPRISE CCP ****** UP AND NOW NOBODY WANTS TO PLAY IN WORMHOLES.
NEWS AT 11 |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
874
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:40:00 -
[14] - Quote
Angsty Teenager wrote:SURPRISE CCP ****** UP AND NOW NOBODY WANTS TO PLAY IN WORMHOLES.
NEWS AT 11 I have not noticed this **** up your talking about. I saw a lot of people whining because its a bit harder to roll holes or you have to be smart about it. I just wanted to see if they accidentally broke the non wh part of the signature spawning. Seems its a no. So i wont worry about it n give it another few days OMG Comet Mining idea!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=331766 |

Bear Paws
The Hells Bells Club
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:52:00 -
[15] - Quote
Angsty Teenager wrote:SURPRISE CCP ****** UP AND NOW NOBODY WANTS TO PLAY IN WORMHOLES.
NEWS AT 11
This +1
Pages and pages of "input" since the update from folks who have obviously never been in a WH for more than 5 mins are just going to confuse things for CCP.
Meanwhile the systems are emptying fast, we're out of our C4 and 3 of the 5 systems we had scouts based in have emptied already too.
As a result 2 corp main accounts expire in the next 7 days and wont be re-subbed, 2 more expire a week later  |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
874
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 20:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Bear Paws wrote:Angsty Teenager wrote:SURPRISE CCP ****** UP AND NOW NOBODY WANTS TO PLAY IN WORMHOLES.
NEWS AT 11 This +1 Pages and pages of "input" since the update from folks who have obviously never been in a WH for more than 5 mins are just going to confuse things for CCP. Meanwhile the systems are emptying fast, we're out of our C4 and 3 of the 5 systems we had scouts based in have emptied already too. As a result 2 corp main accounts expire in the next 7 days and wont be re-subbed, 2 more expire a week later 
Then what exactly is broken? OMG Comet Mining idea!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=331766 |

Angsty Teenager
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
555
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 22:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
DaReaper wrote:
Then what exactly is broken?
CCP's thought process.
They decided to balance the rewards of w-space by making it HARDER, not RISKIER. Reward should be balanced around risk not the amount of effort/grind that has to be put in. It's baffling that they both have made w-space harder and less risky at the same time. (NPC kill api and the WH mass jump range changes).
|

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
875
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 22:47:00 -
[18] - Quote
Angsty Teenager wrote:DaReaper wrote:
Then what exactly is broken?
CCP's thought process. They decided to balance the rewards of w-space by making it HARDER, not RISKIER. Reward should be balanced around risk not the amount of effort/grind that has to be put in. It's baffling that they both have made w-space harder and less risky at the same time. (NPC kill api and the WH mass jump range changes).
I'm not sure how any of what you said had to do with rewards, they have not seems to changed. the npc kill data being blocked is meh, just means you have to hunt a bit before you know if a systems is generally active. and The WH spawn changes.. well i thought most wh corps love pvp, so shouldn;t the ability to catch dreads and the like easier make then happy? I still don;t see how wh;s are broken and i've lived in them off and off form day one and for a over a year now. I see it more as HTFU and adapt or die then broken.
But on topic. i got a gas site spawned today first one since hyp came out. yay! OMG Comet Mining idea!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=331766 |

Tzar Sinak
Mythic Heights
116
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 23:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
I have has gas, relic and data sites spawn in my system. Of all the podcasts I listen to Hyrdostatic is the best! http://hydrostaticpodcast.blogspot.ca/ Nolen Cadmar spreadsheets: Excellent value, great customer service. Don't wait and check them out. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=295315 |

Surrian O'Connor
Hidden.
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 23:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
3 **** gas sites and finally a combat site im my c5. gg ccp, you win. moth balling the system at the next appropriate entrance i think. |
|

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
880
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 23:40:00 -
[21] - Quote
Surrian O'Connor wrote:3 **** gas sites and finally a combat site im my c5. gg ccp, you win. moth balling the system at the next appropriate entrance i think.
awesome, less supply means t3 prices will rise, means more money for me. sweet OMG Comet Mining idea!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=331766 |

Maduin Shi
Perkone Caldari State
71
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 06:32:00 -
[22] - Quote
DaReaper wrote:Surrian O'Connor wrote:3 **** gas sites and finally a combat site im my c5. gg ccp, you win. moth balling the system at the next appropriate entrance i think. awesome, less supply means t3 prices will rise, means more money for me. sweet
Edit: Nevermind |

corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
668
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 13:19:00 -
[23] - Quote
Maduin Shi wrote:corbexx wrote:
aye agree.
although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out.
need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage.
It could be symptomatic of a big drop in WH groups farming their static connections, since its now a lot harder to secure an inactive static. "Parking lot" wormhole systems may be becoming a bigger problem.
aye but this is still bad. People need to make isk and they are still in space so targets which provide content. Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |

Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 13:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
We have one new combat site today. Sorry, I mean one new combat site since Tuesday. :( |

Sequester Risalo
Significant Others
3
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 09:01:00 -
[25] - Quote
Maduin Shi wrote:There's a "pool" of sites that are shared by... a given constellation or region of w-space I forget which. Though the meaning of those terms is sort of lost given how w-space works. But if you run a site, it will respawn in some other w-space system that TQ associates with your constellation/region.
Has this ever been confirmed? I only read about this a s a theory or roumor. Did CCP ever verify that this is actually the case?
|

AtomYcX
Hard Knocks Inc.
81
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 11:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
Sequester Risalo wrote:Maduin Shi wrote:There's a "pool" of sites that are shared by... a given constellation or region of w-space I forget which. Though the meaning of those terms is sort of lost given how w-space works. But if you run a site, it will respawn in some other w-space system that TQ associates with your constellation/region. Has this ever been confirmed? I only read about this a s a theory or roumor. Did CCP ever verify that this is actually the case?
It doesn't seem to be true in my experience, we put scouts in every wormhole system in our constellation (5 other systems) and warped every site whenever they popped up for over a month, and we didn't see a huge influx of sites in our home system. |

Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
1604
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 00:45:00 -
[27] - Quote
Yes, I too have noticed lots and lots of empty systems. C4s with no or one site in them. The normal is for any wormhole to have a minimum of 2-3 sites. You can roll your hole for 4 hours into 8 subsequent C4's and on the ninth find one with 40 sites.
There are some things I would like to just randomly point out in case CCP Greyscale needs to dunk CCP Fozzie headfirst into a bin and unbugger whatever maths has been screwed up here.
OK, so you spent 4 hours of very risky rage-rolling finding the holy grail C4 bear haven with 40 sites. it has 8 wormholes connecting to it, 4 of which are frigate sized. Most people do not run the sites in here because you cannot close the frigate holes down.
So you are up to 4 hours times 5 meatbods time (20 man-hours) to find one system which has decent amounts of PVE content, out of 9 wormholes.
We have two explanations. The First Eight of those wormholes either have very efficient carebears who smack down every sleeper site within hours of it coming up, and live from orcas and have no POSs in 4 of those holes (50% vacancy rate is implied, gg CCP). In the other 4 inhabited holes, they are equally puissant at instantly running sites, such that nothing remains.
The Second Wormholes are not actually spawning.
There's a bad mechanism at work here, too. maybe this will change as people HTFU and adjust to having 4 frigate wormholes open in their system. Maybe people are just being rational, though, and not ratting when there are too many wormholes open. As said above, if CCP doesn't climb down fast from a bad change or tweak things in the RNG so that there's more reward to go with the increased risk, then people are going to either unsub or leave.
One of the above 5 meatbods hasn't run sites in two weeks due to the corp moving out of a Cataclysmic hole 9because they now suck thanks to Hyperion), and moving in to our new hole, which is still potentially hostile. It's also a C4 with two wormhole statics, and a frig hole per day, so it's more risky. We spent hours rolling to get PVE content in the C4 and found nothing we could do (using our rational brains). In a few weeks, my poverty stricken corpie's sub runs out, one two accounts, and he's gone from game because he cannot afford to pay $30/mo and won't pay $30/mo now everything is borked.
Lets put it this way. if CCP borked the sov upgrades which give infinite and endless respawns of Sanctums (a different issue in and of itself, would really enjoy that in w-space), we'd see the whole forums locked down by the ISD gestapo because of the QQ. Yet here we are, with plenty of anecdotal evidence something is awry in w-space spawning mechanics after someone put their poo-finger in the pie (no names) and it's glorious silence.
No Local is a feature of the wormholes, not the forums.
CCP/ISD need to sit down with a PR consultant and look at other massive PR failures recently (try Black Milk clothing, you dirty apes) and cast a weather eye over the recent immature behaviour on the forums. Yes, a lot of people QQ and say inane bullcrap and don't provide feedback. But responding by locking 40 threads shows you've lost the PR battle, and sends a very sure message to your customers: that you really don't appreciate their business at all.
Thanks CCP. Your product is faulty, you need to fix your product, not try to make your customers less a bunch of solipsistic whiny aspergers victims. J's before K's. Sudden Buggery is recruiting w-nerds and w-noobs. Mail your resume in today! http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|

Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
797
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 01:00:00 -
[28] - Quote
Since the patch we've only had 2 rubbish ore sites, no combat anoms that I've noticed (if so they got despawned) and the odd so so gas site and infact not a lot of anything - unusual but its not been long enough to know if theres a change in the trend. |

Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
1613
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 15:06:00 -
[29] - Quote
There is two ways to look at this, given information leaked by CCP Gheyscale.
There is either a mechanism by which a signature is caused to spawn within a given wormhole system.
This mechanism works either on a system whereby the result of that spawn chance is, to whit; a) a static b) a transient wormhole c) a frigate wormhole (nelwy addedin Hyperion) d) a relic site e) a data site f) an ore site g) a combat site
The chance is either as a percentage of a whole number (ie; percentage chances must add up to 10%) or an abitrary number (percentages can add up to +/- 100%).
So. An event happens and the system makes a call (C) on a table (A) whereby the result (R) is determned either as a percentage of a chance. In other words, a chance out of 100, or a chance out of X where X is arbitrary.
1) Of a probability pool of 100% a) Wormhole statics have remained the same percentage b) transient wormholes have been increased a percentage c) frigate wormholes have been added as a percentage d) radars remained the same percentage e) data site remained the same percentage f) ore sites remained the same percentage g) combat anomaly remained the same percentage
2) of a probability pool of X (where X is an arbitrary number) a) Wormhole statics have remained the same percentage of X b) transient wormholes have been increased a percentage of X (ie; X + A) c) frigate wormholes have been added as a percentage (ie; + B) d) radars remained the same e) data site remained the same f) ore sites remained the same g) combat anoma remained the same
Thereore, depending on the probability chances of a frigate or transient wormhole (which have been increased in hyperion by Fozzie) versus the pool of chances (100 *or* X);
Any increase in frigate wormholes from zero naturally results in a decrease in the probabilities of spawning any other result (as a proportion of 100 or X)
Any increase in the chances of spawning a transient wormhole also reduces the probabilities of spawning any other result (as a proportion of Xor 100%)
Therefore, should we really be surprised that a ham-fisted attempt at creating more content in wormholes by rejiggering the spawn percentage chanes of an anomaly vs wormhole vs transient vs frig wormhole, blah blah blagh, will result in LESS ANOMALIES SPAWNING?
No.
OMG you guys have no idea how hard this was to type legibly after ten scotcch whiskeys. ZOMG. Srs problums. J's before K's. Sudden Buggery is recruiting w-nerds and w-noobs. Mail your resume in today! http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|

Levina Windstar
Mekalon Industry
3
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 15:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote: OMG you guys have no idea how hard this was to type legibly after ten scotcch whiskeys. ZOMG. Srs problums.
Kudos for you my friend 
Back on topic, we had 2 or 3 combat site in our C4 since the patch and no data/relic (but these were already pretty rare before the patch anyway...) |
|

chris elliot
Yoyodyne corporation Shadow Cartel
396
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 20:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Maduin Shi wrote:corbexx wrote:
aye agree.
although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out.
need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage.
It could be symptomatic of a big drop in WH groups farming their static connections, since its now a lot harder to secure an inactive static. "Parking lot" wormhole systems may be becoming a bigger problem. aye but this is still bad. People need to make isk and they are still in space so targets which provide content.
From the sound of things lately mate the only things people are doing in space by and large is ship spinning and waiting. |

Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
1619
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 03:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ugh. Such hangover. Mouth taste like dirty sock. Yarf. J's before K's. Sudden Buggery is recruiting w-nerds and w-noobs. Mail your resume in today! http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|

Maduin Shi
Perkone Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 05:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:There is two ways to look at this, given information leaked by CCP Gheyscale.
**math stuff**
I may stand corrected then. We'll probably never get a dev in here to confirm this, but it explains the lack of site spawns and it explains why HK wasn't able to spawn more sites in their home system by warping to sites in their own constellation.
|

Maduin Shi
Perkone Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 05:31:00 -
[34] - Quote
Incidentally, I've had all of one gas and one data/relic site spawn in my C2 since the patch, so something definitely isn't right if there's so many folks with dry wormholes.... |

Pavel Sohaj
Anoikis Exploration
46
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 05:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Maduin Shi wrote:corbexx wrote:
aye agree.
although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out.
need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage.
It could be symptomatic of a big drop in WH groups farming their static connections, since its now a lot harder to secure an inactive static. "Parking lot" wormhole systems may be becoming a bigger problem. aye but this is still bad. People need to make isk and they are still in space so targets which provide content.
Right. Content. We wanted to at least MINE some friggin ore yesterday. Five wormholes, but of all kinds which is amusingly fun. C1, C3, C5, 2 frig ones. And to that four miners. So we logged. People aint figuring out anything, its still the same, only what changed is that its nigh impossible to farm with six to twelve exits open in just your home and static WHs. SO the sites stay there.
I wonder whos in space to provide targets, I spent three hours ship spinning under POS and logged off :D guess thats CCPs main aim. Honestly corbexx, do they not care at all ? THere is no incentive to play the game really so all there is to it is account expiration and throwing cash at smth else, maybe some cosmetic items at Dota 2. And judging by general response, ppl are happy that others are leaving even. Not bad. |

chris elliot
Yoyodyne corporation Shadow Cartel
396
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 15:01:00 -
[36] - Quote
Pavel Sohaj wrote: Honestly corbexx, do they not care at all ?
People have already answered this, the answer is, no they don't.
Pavel Sohaj wrote: THere is no incentive to play the game really so all there is to it is account expiration and throwing cash at smth else, maybe some cosmetic items at Dota 2.
Carfull, or they will censor you for suggesting such blasphemy as actually going and playing something else. |

Terrorfrodo
Renegade Hobbits for Mordor
650
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 15:19:00 -
[37] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:There is two ways to look at this, given information leaked by CCP Gheyscale.
~interesting stuff~ Is that solid knowledge or more like conjecture?
If that is fact and the numbers were not adjusted to keep site spawns like before the changes, that would seem incredibly... odd. It's hard to imagine that something obvious like that could be an oversight.
From my own scanning, I can say that I see plenty of sites, but since most of the systems are inactive, they may just have been there a long time. . |

Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
801
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 21:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
6 sigs today, 5 of them wormholes the other the common ore site still hanging about, doesn't look like most of the systems in the chain(s) have much in the way of sites (other than gas/ore) either but plenty of wormholes :S |

corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
678
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 22:38:00 -
[39] - Quote
chris elliot wrote:corbexx wrote:Maduin Shi wrote:corbexx wrote:
aye agree.
although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out.
need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage.
It could be symptomatic of a big drop in WH groups farming their static connections, since its now a lot harder to secure an inactive static. "Parking lot" wormhole systems may be becoming a bigger problem. aye but this is still bad. People need to make isk and they are still in space so targets which provide content. From the sound of things lately mate the only things people are doing in space by and large is ship spinning and waiting.
sad thing is I think you could be very right.
we've connected to a few big groups and they havent had the numbers to fight us, so we have literally farmed there sites. Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |

corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
678
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 22:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
Pavel Sohaj wrote: Honestly corbexx, do they not care at all ? THere is no incentive to play the game really so all there is to it is account expiration and throwing cash at smth else, maybe some cosmetic items at Dota 2. And judging by general response, ppl are happy that others are leaving even. Not bad.
They care, the issue is they think this is for the best. I disagree and so do most people on the forums. But I don't think they are willing to change it till the numbers show how god aweful this is, At which point I just hope to bob its not to late.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
|

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
890
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 22:44:00 -
[41] - Quote
very few sites, but been robbing from other people, so I don't care. just wish I had some damn gas to mine OMG Comet Mining idea!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=331766 |

scorchlikeshiswhiskey
interstellar initiative Incorporated
243
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 23:37:00 -
[42] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Pavel Sohaj wrote: Honestly corbexx, do they not care at all ? THere is no incentive to play the game really so all there is to it is account expiration and throwing cash at smth else, maybe some cosmetic items at Dota 2. And judging by general response, ppl are happy that others are leaving even. Not bad.
They care, the issue is they think this is for the best. I disagree and so do most people on the forums. But I don't think they are willing to change it till the numbers show how god aweful this is, At which point I just hope to bob its not to late. Just a thought here, but what if (big if, I know) one of them descended from their lofty heights atop mount don't-give-a-**** and descended to the realm of us mere mortals and *gasp* actually listened to feedback instead of dismissing it because it doesn't agree with their pre-conceived notion of what players want? We all know that the numbers ("metrics") will back their decision because they have washed their hands of Hyperion and are already 2 weeks deep in the next project. Sarcasm aside, I say actually because, in my experience, when a Dev comes onto the forums in regards to patch changes they have a tendency to: 1)Ask for feedback 2)Quiet the concerns of their player base by sounding reasonable 3)Ignore the forums because too many people won't drink the Kool-Aid (people still disagreeing with them) 4)Proceed with/leave in place the changes they came up with 5)Move on to another half-baked idea in the same way 6)Lock the thread or let it die a natural death by not seeing a Dev post for scores of pages 7)Defend their position with the mysterious "metrics" that, of course, support their position entirely
I get that they're the developers, they make the game, but from my perspective they seem to have lost touch with the fact that players make the content. No one wants to pay for/grind for a sub just to run the same handful of missions, we continue to sub to the game because of the other people in it and when they start screwing with that they are, quite literally, pushing players closer and closer to un-sub'ing. I don't expect the Dev's to be at the beck and call of the players, but I am neither the first nor the thousandth person to express concern that they do what they want and damn what we think of it. There has to be a middle ground and, on the face of it, the CSM would seem to be a step in the right direction but from my perspective it seems like even the CSM has trouble getting through to the Dev's. I could be wrong on that last bit though since I have exactly 0 experience with being a CSM rep. Now, I know a few players that were at FanFest and they told me that the spawn distance change actually came from players at a round-table and that is great, however that was a fairly small percentage of the total player base. I also understand that it wouldn't be a good business model if they were to scrap all the code and manhours every time the forums disagree, but is it too much to ask for modifications to be made? The example that comes to my mind is the RLML debacle with Rise, and that is the basis for my little list up yonder, and the reason I yap about it so much is because Rise told players that he wanted to modify RLML's so that an ammo swap wouldn't take the full 35 seconds. We're still waiting for that. He also admitted that the RLML's were released on a rush job, they were incomplete and yet they haven't been touched to my knowledge since. These are just examples of my concerns, I could be way off base and if I am willing to admit it, but as a common player on the forums it seems like a great many people agree with me, at least in part, for their own reasons.
**Again, just to be clear, it is entirely possible that I am way off base so, if I am and someone would like to point that out, try and resist the urge to flame and let's try to keep this civil and reasonable. Much like Trinkets, I am not entirely sober so if my thought process seems off that is likely why. |

Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
1621
|
Posted - 2014.09.03 23:55:00 -
[43] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Trinkets friend wrote:There is two ways to look at this, given information leaked by CCP Gheyscale.
~interesting stuff~ Is that solid knowledge or more like conjecture? If that is fact and the numbers were not adjusted to keep site spawns like before the changes, that would seem incredibly... odd. It's hard to imagine that something obvious like that could be an oversight. From my own scanning, I can say that I see plenty of sites, but since most of the systems are inactive, they may just have been there a long time.
You are so good at low-llevel rhetorical sarcasm I was halfway through responding to you in TL;DR fashion before I trollface.jpg. Hahahahah. Ahhahahah.
The above was a bit of insight gained at the bottom of an overfilled tumbler of Oban 14 year old single malt. There is literally no way it could not work in one of the above two ways, when you think about it after a relatively smaller glass of Six isles Blended.
As to your hilarious assertion that the devs could make such an obvious oversight, we have seen them look over the edge of their bathtub of terrible PR and add descriptions to wormholes to clue in their hapless victims, uh customers, as to wwhether they can take their 1.8B ISk Tengu through any particular K162 or not.
There is, overall, a case to be made for increasing ratting income from sites. Given you have infinite-spawning Sanctums in Null, with Local, and straight payout to ISK, or let alone incursion farming (now 24 hours long after they patched it to stop griefing of those entitled whiny neckbeards), it is kind of a bit of an insult to wormholers when, eg, 6 guys make 55M each after churning C4 sites (Info Sanctums) for an hour. Then we have to salvage, move the loot and blue poo to market, and in many cases prep for an hour beforehand.
Seems odd that the highest risk activity in the game gets actively made riskier, and now due to maths, less lucrative (to the point of starvation), and we will have to wait weeks, if not months, for change. I mean, CCP Fozzie brought the nerf bat out after 6 months on Ishtars Online, and it was a swing and a miss. Your Bouncer IIs track 5% less at 100km, where your victims have near zero transversal anyway.
GOLF CLAP J's before K's. Sudden Buggery is recruiting w-nerds and w-noobs. Mail your resume in today! http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|

Maduin Shi
Perkone Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 01:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
corbexx wrote:chris elliot wrote:corbexx wrote:Maduin Shi wrote:corbexx wrote:
aye agree.
although after a patch (espeically the first wh patch in 3 years) stuff should be up even if its just due to people trying **** out. so if its down early on that could be a issue, although the oposite is true and it coudl be people need a month to figure it out.
need to wait for numbers. although my worry is by the time we get them **** will already be in a really bad stage.
It could be symptomatic of a big drop in WH groups farming their static connections, since its now a lot harder to secure an inactive static. "Parking lot" wormhole systems may be becoming a bigger problem. aye but this is still bad. People need to make isk and they are still in space so targets which provide content. From the sound of things lately mate the only things people are doing in space by and large is ship spinning and waiting. sad thing is I think you could be very right. we've connected to a few big groups and they havent had the numbers to fight us, so we have literally farmed there sites.
Well if it gets any worse PvP will become the new PvE. 
|

Maduin Shi
Perkone Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 01:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Terrorfrodo wrote:Trinkets friend wrote:There is two ways to look at this, given information leaked by CCP Gheyscale.
~interesting stuff~ Is that solid knowledge or more like conjecture? If that is fact and the numbers were not adjusted to keep site spawns like before the changes, that would seem incredibly... odd. It's hard to imagine that something obvious like that could be an oversight. From my own scanning, I can say that I see plenty of sites, but since most of the systems are inactive, they may just have been there a long time. You are so good at low-llevel rhetorical sarcasm I was halfway through responding to you in TL;DR fashion before I trollface.jpg. Hahahahah. Ahhahahah. The above was a bit of insight gained at the bottom of an overfilled tumbler of Oban 14 year old single malt. There is literally no way it could not work in one of the above two ways, when you think about it after a relatively smaller glass of Six isles Blended.
LOL that must be some ******* amazing booze, because that had to be one of the best Greyscale impressions I've ever seen
|

Jez Amatin
Enso Corp
11
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 11:05:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ok so a little over a week since patch and we have had following spawn in our C4:
2 x gas sites 1 x cosmic anom
On the other hand no shortage of WH. As far as im aware, no one had been running PVE sites in our home since patch day. I've never thought our C4 spawn rate was particularly high, but this seems way too low. 
|

Bleichrodt
Joseph Deacon Industries.
9
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 14:34:00 -
[47] - Quote
Since patch have really noticed this-thought to check forums to see if it just me. I move through many systems every session-there is clearly a dearth of anomalies-seems to have been worsening daily since last week....as for finding any action with everyone either pos'd up continually or just not at home any more....
Have they really gone and wrecked w-space? |

Relgast
Losi Laboratories
14
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 02:25:00 -
[48] - Quote
Yeah, we have seen the same thing. We have had a really active site spawn for about a year - and after the patch its been 1 anom every couple days at best. We assumed it was just everyone hibernating after the patch... Hope it wakes back up soon...
|

Nancy Wayke
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 08:00:00 -
[49] - Quote
As of last night we have had zero combat sites spawn since the patch. I mailed corbexx yesterday on my main with more information. |

Anize Oramara
EVE Protection Agency Bloodline.
287
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 08:47:00 -
[50] - Quote
The prevailing thought regarding wh spawns is based on the idea that wh space code is merely repurposed k-space code (would make a ton of sense from a dev pov)
this means things like constellations and more importantly spawn mechanics based on them would also be reused (and why not?)
so the explanation for no sites spawning really is as simple as an extreme drop in a) people in wh space/exploring wh space (warping to sigs to despawn them in statics is normal practice for all smart c5/6 corps) and b) a drop in people running sites.
Now its all fine and dandy saying we should wait for 2 months of data and for ccp to get off their lazy behinds but a lot of people, once they unsub, are not coming back. wh space is PERMANENTLY losing people. they are not coming back.
just to make it crystal clear ccp and corbexx, the damage done, and being done right now is PERMANENT unless huge incentives are introduced to move back into whs or resub. just reversing most of these change wont be enough anymore.
tldr: ccp got rekt wrt whs. |
|

Janeway84
Its a good day to die ORPHANS OF EVE
96
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 10:02:00 -
[51] - Quote
I wonder if enough people unsub the melted nano ribbon prices will reach 10-15 mil again?  |

umnikar
Fishbone Industries
43
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 08:28:00 -
[52] - Quote
Janeway84 wrote:I wonder if enough people unsub the melted nano ribbon prices will reach 10-15 mil again? 
Don't think so. c1-4 has about 0 impact on the market.
|

Nancy Wayke
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 09:55:00 -
[53] - Quote
We had our first site spawn since the patch, so we're now on +1 |

epicurus ataraxia
The Scope Gallente Federation
1213
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 11:16:00 -
[54] - Quote
Anize Oramara wrote:The prevailing thought regarding wh spawns is based on the idea that wh space code is merely repurposed k-space code (would make a ton of sense from a dev pov)
this means things like constellations and more importantly spawn mechanics based on them would also be reused (and why not?)
so the explanation for no sites spawning really is as simple as an extreme drop in a) people in wh space/exploring wh space (warping to sigs to despawn them in statics is normal practice for all smart c5/6 corps) and b) a drop in people running sites.
Now its all fine and dandy saying we should wait for 2 months of data and for ccp to get off their lazy behinds but a lot of people, once they unsub, are not coming back. wh space is PERMANENTLY losing people. they are not coming back.
just to make it crystal clear ccp and corbexx, the damage done, and being done right now is PERMANENT unless huge incentives are introduced to move back into whs or resub. just reversing most of these change wont be enough anymore.
tldr: ccp got rekt wrt whs.
While I disagree with the lazy devs bit, your overall conclusions of the effects are sound. yes, people are leaving wormhole space, some temporarily, some with no wish to ever come back. Mostly, once someone leaves in the first place, the decision is so reluctantly arrived at, and so tiresome to implement, that there will need to be STUNNING improvements to encourage return. So in short they have created a massive amount of future work for themselves. From Corbexx's posts he is quite clear in his concerns, and is working VERY hard to bring matters to CCP's attention, and provide hard data regarding Wh income, to address this.
But yes, Hyperion was a massive clusterfrack for wormhole space. But through misunderstanding, lack of understanding, and ill advised, I doubt if laziness was the cause.
There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE |

Maker Atavuli
Core Intel Silent Requiem
14
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 16:07:00 -
[55] - Quote
Since the patch we have had ONE fort to spawn, ALL of the other sigs have been WH's. As a long time resident and active member of the EVE community I am asking CCP to please let the players know what they are doing. If you intended to change the spawn rate just say so. We are not asking to know the secret mechanics as we are smart enough to grasp that soon anyway. Just some confirmation, yes there is a issue and we are addressing it or no the game is working correctly. We have a vote coming up to decide if its worth continuing to live in Wspace or not. My corp has gone from playing every night for 3-4 hours to folks logging in seeing an empty piece of swiss cheese and logging out to play other games. As a group we have been playing together for years I hate the idea of losing these guys.
|

Jarett Thoranos
Blackstar Privateer Consortium Enigma Project
0
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 22:42:00 -
[56] - Quote
Anyone know if CCP plans to 'fix' this issue? |

Angsty Teenager
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
580
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 22:44:00 -
[57] - Quote
Jarett Thoranos wrote:Anyone know if CCP plans to 'fix' this issue?
hahaha
no they don't
just give up on wormhole space it's dead |

Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
818
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 19:35:00 -
[58] - Quote
Not had anything but 1 ore site and wormholes for a week straight :S most of the systems empty or not in the chains are devoid of more than 1-2 sites also aside from the odd empty system that'll have a dozen site or so. |

Prince Golem
Adeptus Mechanikus
8
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 00:17:00 -
[59] - Quote
going to be leaving this worm hole soon if I don't get any sites to run. 4 combats sites in a week. last two days+ none. something is broken. |

Nancy Wayke
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 21:35:00 -
[60] - Quote
Update, since the patch we've had 3 sites despawn, and 3 sites spawn, so we're at 3 sites. |
|

Ruffio Sepico
Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering
32
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:05:00 -
[61] - Quote
Prince Golem wrote:going to be leaving this worm hole soon if I don't get any sites to run. 4 combats sites in a week. last two days+ none. something is broken.
Dont know what wh class you live in, but less sites being done, less sites will spawn, and you have some systems "hoarde" sites until someone run them. Found an empty c3 today with some 40+ anoms and ore sites.
|

Ruffio Sepico
Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering
74
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:05:33 -
[62] - Quote
Prince Golem wrote:going to be leaving this worm hole soon if I don't get any sites to run. 4 combats sites in a week. last two days+ none. something is broken.
Dont know what wh class you live in, but less sites being done, less sites will spawn, and you have some systems "hoarde" sites until someone run them. Found an empty c3 today with some 40+ anoms and ore sites.
|

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:34:00 -
[63] - Quote
Janeway84 wrote:I wonder if enough people unsub the melted nano ribbon prices will reach 10-15 mil again?  That would be nice... At least the WH carebears whines would have a good effect for those that do not follow the self inflated gripes against Hyperion, and adapt to thrive in truly risky environments... "surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html |

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:34:34 -
[64] - Quote
Janeway84 wrote:I wonder if enough people unsub the melted nano ribbon prices will reach 10-15 mil again?  That would be nice... At least the WH carebears whines would have a good effect for those that do not follow the self inflated gripes against Hyperion, and adapt to thrive in truly risky environments...
"surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope
http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html
|

Ruffio Sepico
Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering
32
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:52:00 -
[65] - Quote
Saisin wrote:Janeway84 wrote:I wonder if enough people unsub the melted nano ribbon prices will reach 10-15 mil again?  That would be nice... At least the WH carebears whines would have a good effect for those that do not follow the self inflated gripes against Hyperion, and adapt to thrive in truly risky environments...
What you do for isk? Everyone got to bear some for isk now and then... Like it or not, those you call carebears have a function in wspace too. If wspace in the end, just ends up being a few large enteties, I doubt much fun will be had.
Price of nano ribbon's is just not tied to how many people running sites, but actual use of the materials. Rest of sleeper salvage outside nano ribbons is dead cheap. Seing much use of t3 doctrines outside wspace these days?
|

Ruffio Sepico
Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering
74
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 22:52:25 -
[66] - Quote
Saisin wrote:Janeway84 wrote:I wonder if enough people unsub the melted nano ribbon prices will reach 10-15 mil again?  That would be nice... At least the WH carebears whines would have a good effect for those that do not follow the self inflated gripes against Hyperion, and adapt to thrive in truly risky environments...
What you do for isk? Everyone got to bear some for isk now and then... Like it or not, those you call carebears have a function in wspace too. If wspace in the end, just ends up being a few large enteties, I doubt much fun will be had.
Price of nano ribbon's is just not tied to how many people running sites, but actual use of the materials. Rest of sleeper salvage outside nano ribbons is dead cheap. Seing much use of t3 doctrines outside wspace these days?
|

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 07:24:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ruffio Sepico wrote:What you do for isk? Everyone got to bear some for isk now and then... Like it or not, those you call carebears have a function in wspace too. If wspace in the end, just ends up being a few large enteties, I doubt much fun will be had. Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
Ruffio Sepico wrote: Price of nano ribbon's is just not tied to how many people running sites, but actual use of the materials. Rest of sleeper salvage outside nano ribbons is dead cheap. ...
Some of the sleeper data is still pretty valuable, overall in a c3 it is around 30 mil for one anomaly, and around 15mn of farming and salvaging uninterrupted... I could do them faster before as I used to do around 5, sometime 6, anomalies per hour before hyperion, but now I have to be more watchful, and I have dropped to 4 per hour when I can do them.
"surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html |

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 07:24:17 -
[68] - Quote
Ruffio Sepico wrote:What you do for isk? Everyone got to bear some for isk now and then... Like it or not, those you call carebears have a function in wspace too. If wspace in the end, just ends up being a few large enteties, I doubt much fun will be had. Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
Ruffio Sepico wrote: Price of nano ribbon's is just not tied to how many people running sites, but actual use of the materials. Rest of sleeper salvage outside nano ribbons is dead cheap. ...
Some of the sleeper data is still pretty valuable, overall in a c3 it is around 30 mil for one anomaly, and around 15mn of farming and salvaging uninterrupted... I could do them faster before as I used to do around 5, sometime 6, anomalies per hour before hyperion, but now I have to be more watchful, and I have dropped to 4 per hour when I can do them.
"surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope
http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html
|

Papa Django
CosmoTeK LTD La Division Bleue
31
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 08:09:00 -
[69] - Quote
Saisin wrote: Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
But you are wrong on the current situation. Everything is harder for the C1-C4 wh entities. Nothing has changed for C5-C6 entities. And thoses C5-C6 entities are the main supplier for sleeper salvage on the market.
This patch is a disaster for small / mid corps. It's riskier, harder, and there is a lot less content. All wrong. For big corps, nothing has changed, except bigger chain map that is a good thing for them. |

Papa Django
CosmoTeK LTD La Division Bleue
43
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 08:09:30 -
[70] - Quote
Saisin wrote: Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
But you are wrong on the current situation. Everything is harder for the C1-C4 wh entities. Nothing has changed for C5-C6 entities. And thoses C5-C6 entities are the main supplier for sleeper salvage on the market.
This patch is a disaster for small / mid corps. It's riskier, harder, and there is a lot less content. All wrong. For big corps, nothing has changed, except bigger chain map that is a good thing for them. |
|

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 08:25:00 -
[71] - Quote
Papa Django wrote:Saisin wrote: Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
But you are wrong on the current situation. Everything is harder for the C1-C4 wh entities. Nothing has changed for C5-C6 entities. And thoses C5-C6 entities are the main supplier for sleeper salvage on the market. This patch is a disaster for small / mid corps. It's riskier, harder, and there is a lot less content. All wrong. For big corps, nothing has changed, except bigger chain map that is a good thing for them.
I certainly have had more opportunities to engage around WH collapsing than ever in the past 4 weeks, and being one of the smallest unit I do not see Hyperion as a disaster.
Nobody really knows what are the goals that CCP is going after with these changes, and in any case they will have the data to validate or not their theories about these changes.
My bet is and has been all along that WH space was generating too much ISK too easily, but if this is the case, this is a topic they can't really communicate about, for obvious PR reasons.. If I am right, and this ease of making ISK in WH continues to happen for larger groups, then something else will be changed in WH that target more effectively the larger groups also.
The only thing I do know for sure, and that educates my perception about these changes, is that I never made as much ISK per week until I settled in my C3 and, before the mass changes, I have never been able to engage WH collapsers like I can now do...
"surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html |

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 08:25:22 -
[72] - Quote
Papa Django wrote:Saisin wrote: Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
But you are wrong on the current situation. Everything is harder for the C1-C4 wh entities. Nothing has changed for C5-C6 entities. And thoses C5-C6 entities are the main supplier for sleeper salvage on the market. This patch is a disaster for small / mid corps. It's riskier, harder, and there is a lot less content. All wrong. For big corps, nothing has changed, except bigger chain map that is a good thing for them.
I certainly have had more opportunities to engage around WH collapsing than ever in the past 4 weeks, and being one of the smallest unit I do not see Hyperion as a disaster.
Nobody really knows what are the goals that CCP is going after with these changes, and in any case they will have the data to validate or not their theories about these changes.
My bet is and has been all along that WH space was generating too much ISK too easily, but if this is the case, this is a topic they can't really communicate about, for obvious PR reasons.. If I am right, and this ease of making ISK in WH continues to happen for larger groups, then something else will be changed in WH that target more effectively the larger groups also.
The only thing I do know for sure, and that educates my perception about these changes, is that I never made as much ISK per week until I settled in my C3 and, before the mass changes, I have never been able to engage WH collapsers like I can now do...
"surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope
http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html
|

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
544
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 13:48:00 -
[73] - Quote
Saisin wrote:Mainly farming anomalies in a C3
Saisin wrote:I never made as much ISK per week until I settled in my C3 So, you settled in a C3 and are running your own system's anomalies, making huge bank? I ask this, since a C3 doesn't have a C3 static, so you're not farming your static. In fact, you can only reliably get to K-space, beyond whatever holes open up into you. If you have a particularly crappy K-space type, it's entirely likely that people try to roll you off to get a different C3, thus leading to your opportunities to try to catch hole rollers.
So congrats on finding one of those occasional undesirable gold mine systems. They're great when you can find them, but the money doesn't last once you run out of anomalies and are waiting for more of them to spawn.
|

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
553
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 13:48:40 -
[74] - Quote
Saisin wrote:Mainly farming anomalies in a C3
Saisin wrote:I never made as much ISK per week until I settled in my C3 So, you settled in a C3 and are running your own system's anomalies, making huge bank? I ask this, since a C3 doesn't have a C3 static, so you're not farming your static. In fact, you can only reliably get to K-space, beyond whatever holes open up into you. If you have a particularly crappy K-space type, it's entirely likely that people try to roll you off to get a different C3, thus leading to your opportunities to try to catch hole rollers.
So congrats on finding one of those occasional undesirable gold mine systems. They're great when you can find them, but the money doesn't last once you run out of anomalies and are waiting for more of them to spawn.
|

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 15:38:00 -
[75] - Quote
Meytal wrote:Saisin wrote:Mainly farming anomalies in a C3 Saisin wrote:I never made as much ISK per week until I settled in my C3 So, you settled in a C3 and are running your own system's anomalies, making huge bank? I ask this, since a C3 doesn't have a C3 static, so you're not farming your static. In fact, you can only reliably get to K-space, beyond whatever holes open up into you. If you have a particularly crappy K-space type, it's entirely likely that people try to roll you off to get a different C3, thus leading to your opportunities to try to catch hole rollers. So congrats on finding one of those occasional undesirable gold mine systems. They're great when you can find them, but the money doesn't last once you run out of anomalies and are waiting for more of them to spawn. My static is Null Sec, and once I am out of anomalies I can go hunt/look for preys there. There is also more connections so more systems to scout and potential for extra isks. But with the anomalies there, I can make short of 1 billion per week. I can't farm as often in full security as I used to because of the extra connections of course, but it is still a solid 800 Mill for around 5 to 6 hours of play scattered during the week. It is also fairly easy when the static does not end up in a populated NS area to go do the sites/belts over there. I never saw this system as crappy, but indeed I can see how others would.... "surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html |

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 15:38:57 -
[76] - Quote
Meytal wrote:Saisin wrote:Mainly farming anomalies in a C3 Saisin wrote:I never made as much ISK per week until I settled in my C3 So, you settled in a C3 and are running your own system's anomalies, making huge bank? I ask this, since a C3 doesn't have a C3 static, so you're not farming your static. In fact, you can only reliably get to K-space, beyond whatever holes open up into you. If you have a particularly crappy K-space type, it's entirely likely that people try to roll you off to get a different C3, thus leading to your opportunities to try to catch hole rollers. So congrats on finding one of those occasional undesirable gold mine systems. They're great when you can find them, but the money doesn't last once you run out of anomalies and are waiting for more of them to spawn. My static is Null Sec, and once I am out of anomalies I can go hunt/look for preys there. There is also more connections so more systems to scout and potential for extra isks. But with the anomalies there, I can make short of 1 billion per week. I can't farm as often in full security as I used to because of the extra connections of course, but it is still a solid 800 Mill for around 5 to 6 hours of play scattered during the week. It is also fairly easy when the static does not end up in a populated NS area to go do the sites/belts over there. I never saw this system as crappy, but indeed I can see how others would....
"surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope
http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html
|

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
544
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 16:52:00 -
[77] - Quote
Saisin wrote:I never saw this system as crappy, but indeed I can see how others would.... Yeah, usually people with a C3 static are rolling it looking for a route to hisec.
Given the complaints in this thread about limited respawns of W-space anomalies, are you saying that you are getting new anomalies regularly? If you're pulling in that much income per week for an extended period of time, even solo you're not living on a gold mine and so there has to be something more than just pre-existing anomalies. I think that's what most people have been questioning, whether the anomalies in W-space are respawning regularly since Hyperion. |

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
553
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 16:52:05 -
[78] - Quote
Saisin wrote:I never saw this system as crappy, but indeed I can see how others would.... Yeah, usually people with a C3 static are rolling it looking for a route to hisec.
Given the complaints in this thread about limited respawns of W-space anomalies, are you saying that you are getting new anomalies regularly? If you're pulling in that much income per week for an extended period of time, even solo you're not living on a gold mine and so there has to be something more than just pre-existing anomalies. I think that's what most people have been questioning, whether the anomalies in W-space are respawning regularly since Hyperion. |

Icarus Able
Revenant Tactical
482
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 19:26:00 -
[79] - Quote
Papa Django wrote:Saisin wrote: Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
But you are wrong on the current situation. Everything is harder for the C1-C4 wh entities. Nothing has changed for C5-C6 entities. And thoses C5-C6 entities are the main supplier for sleeper salvage on the market. This patch is a disaster for small / mid corps. It's riskier, harder, and there is a lot less content. All wrong. For big corps, nothing has changed, except bigger chain map that is a good thing for them.
Who says this is a good thing for c5-c6 corps? This change effects us the most. You think its bad crashing in a bs when you land outside of jumprange by like 3km try a carrier landing at 15-20km. Combat rolling and controlling the hole for the smaller c5-c6 groups is now impossible when presented with a larger force.
We cant fight large nullsec groups either for the same problem. |

Icarus Able
Revenant Tactical
490
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 19:26:13 -
[80] - Quote
Papa Django wrote:Saisin wrote: Mainly farming anomalies in a C3, and it is certainly more challenging to do, but not impossible, so if some of the loot become rarer and more valuable I am all for it.. I am not going to leave WH space. My whole point is that farming in WH was way too secure before Hyperion, and WH space needed to get this dangerous area feeling back.
But you are wrong on the current situation. Everything is harder for the C1-C4 wh entities. Nothing has changed for C5-C6 entities. And thoses C5-C6 entities are the main supplier for sleeper salvage on the market. This patch is a disaster for small / mid corps. It's riskier, harder, and there is a lot less content. All wrong. For big corps, nothing has changed, except bigger chain map that is a good thing for them.
Who says this is a good thing for c5-c6 corps? This change effects us the most. You think its bad crashing in a bs when you land outside of jumprange by like 3km try a carrier landing at 15-20km. Combat rolling and controlling the hole for the smaller c5-c6 groups is now impossible when presented with a larger force.
We cant fight large nullsec groups either for the same problem. |
|

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 21:04:00 -
[81] - Quote
Meytal wrote:Saisin wrote:I never saw this system as crappy, but indeed I can see how others would.... Yeah, usually people with a C3 static are rolling it looking for a route to hisec. Given the complaints in this thread about limited respawns of W-space anomalies, are you saying that you are getting new anomalies regularly? If you're pulling in that much income per week for an extended period of time, even solo you're not living on a gold mine and so there has to be something more than just pre-existing anomalies. I think that's what most people have been questioning, whether the anomalies in W-space are respawning regularly since Hyperion.
Yes, they are there, at least where I am... I have had no shortage of anom for the past weeks.. Also got up to 6 WH at one time, on top of my static... But I managed to dry the anoms down last week, and this week after the week end, I had at least 12 that re appeared.
I think one of the main thing that Hyperion brought is that you can't control your timing as easily as you used to... When you have a few hours of time dedicated to your gaming for example, and you can't farm during that time because of multiple connections that are more difficult to close, I can see how a player resent the change if their only drive is to make ISK by farming, but at the same time I do not think WH should be the panacea to farm ISK in isolation...
On my side, I adapt my activity to the situation in my WH when I get to play, so if I can't farm, then I explore the connections and look for opportunities there.. "surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html |

Saisin
State War Academy Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2014.09.18 21:04:57 -
[82] - Quote
Meytal wrote:Saisin wrote:I never saw this system as crappy, but indeed I can see how others would.... Yeah, usually people with a C3 static are rolling it looking for a route to hisec. Given the complaints in this thread about limited respawns of W-space anomalies, are you saying that you are getting new anomalies regularly? If you're pulling in that much income per week for an extended period of time, even solo you're not living on a gold mine and so there has to be something more than just pre-existing anomalies. I think that's what most people have been questioning, whether the anomalies in W-space are respawning regularly since Hyperion.
Yes, they are there, at least where I am... I have had no shortage of anom for the past weeks.. Also got up to 6 WH at one time, on top of my static... But I managed to dry the anoms down last week, and this week after the week end, I had at least 12 that re appeared.
I think one of the main thing that Hyperion brought is that you can't control your timing as easily as you used to... When you have a few hours of time dedicated to your gaming for example, and you can't farm during that time because of multiple connections that are more difficult to close, I can see how a player resent the change if their only drive is to make ISK by farming, but at the same time I do not think WH should be the panacea to farm ISK in isolation...
On my side, I adapt my activity to the situation in my WH when I get to play, so if I can't farm, then I explore the connections and look for opportunities there..
"surrender your ego, be free". innuendo.
solo? There is a new hope
http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/2014/05/ok-now-im-betting-man.html
|

Nancy Wayke
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2014.09.19 18:44:00 -
[83] - Quote
Still at -3/+3 for a total of 3 sites since the patch.
Currently 7 wormholes leading in and out of the system, inclusive of statics
Edit: And we carry on getting our statics re-appear in exactly the same place with exactly the same signature ID? |

Nancy Wayke
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2014.09.19 18:44:41 -
[84] - Quote
Still at -3/+3 for a total of 3 sites since the patch.
Currently 7 wormholes leading in and out of the system, inclusive of statics
Edit: And we carry on getting our statics re-appear in exactly the same place with exactly the same signature ID? |

Kethok Hellion
Immortalis Fratres Vacui Legio immortales CXCI
2
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 01:55:27 -
[85] - Quote
I have been living in c4 wh's since b4 and after the patch.. I personally have no problems with the updates or re-balancing but the age old trouble I still have with wh's are the site spawn rates or region numbers.. c4 sites I honestly think need more reward now that there is a little more risk and they shld also spawn faster.. for days and days we have no sites spawning. Even ore belts sometimes take weeks.. I travel around sear hing for systems within our constellation so that I can activate them but with only 7 c4's in my constellation its a very very unsuccessful venture.. running sites in statics isnt so hard but the rewards are in my opinion too low.. if it wasnt for the horrid polotics in null.. theres more sense living there.. I love wormholes tho.. I will choose to live there above any other space.. just for the solitude.. however.. my opinion will always stand .. c4's need more sites and more reward.. it doesnt need to be doubled like some people say..
My view o7 fly upside down |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |