EVE Search - CCP employee encourages web defacements

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CCP employee encourages web defacements

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:32:00 - [1] Yesterday evening a CCP employee (Sharkbait) encouraged web defacements on a website EVE Information Wiki as an attempt to try to shut down this wiki with EVE technical information. He then proceeded to abuse a customer on the forum by editing their post and then tried to cover up this by removning it but on the site attacked there is an image of his abuse. What does CCP have to say about his support and active encouragement of web defacements? CCP has been notified and awaiting a response and so has the various ISP's involved.
Ediz Daxx FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:35:00 - [2] huh?
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:36:00 - [3] Originally by: Ediz Daxx huh? Yup, website defeced and encouraged by developer Sharkbait. Sad sad state of affairs when a company has to abuse customers who take a technical interest in the game and post it on a website.
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Kimotoro Directive	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:36:00 - [4] Edited by: Malthros Zenobia on 30/07/2006 08:38:35 IBTL 'Space Gurl', hmm, why does that name set my troll-detector off? edit: That link is pathetic. 'Cyber vandalism'? God, that site's author is a freaking moron. I'm curious to know what sSpace troll said before it got modded, because as you can see from the pre-'vandalism'(), a beatdown was incoming.
Omber Zombie Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:37:00 - [5] am i missing something? Where in the picture that you have there is sharkbait encouraging cyber vandalism? Quote: Yesterday evening a CCP employee (Sharkbait) encouraged web defacements on a website EVE Information Wiki as an attempt to try to shut down this wiki with EVE technical information. Posting eve technical info to an eve info site? This is bad? Sorry, but you're not making a huge aount of sense here. ----------------------
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:38:00 - [6] Originally by: Malthros Zenobia Edited by: Malthros Zenobia on 30/07/2006 08:36:45 One thing to say: IBTL. 'Space Gurl', hmm, why does that name set my troll-detector off? edit: That link is pathetic. 'Cyber vandalism'? God, that site's author is a freaking moron. Your personal views does not mean you have the right to attack somebodys site. Are you actually saying you support such actions?
Ediz Daxx FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:40:00 - [7] Proof proof proof.. where is it hiding? Under a rock? Under my desk? In the woods perhaps?
Merv Tring GeoTech	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:40:00 - [8] Do you have any evidence that Sharkie did anything but ban a ridiculously annoying troll? Any evidence at all? The tiniest little scrap will do.
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:42:00 - [9] Edited by: LauraBalls on 30/07/2006 08:42:40 Originally by: Merv Tring Do you have any evidence that Sharkie did anything but ban a ridiculously annoying troll? Any evidence at all? The tiniest little scrap will do. As you can see clearly on the website an image of his immaturity on the forums by editing customers posts to make them say something they did not say and encouraging childish behaviour by defacements which soon followed from various IP's which have been reported to CCP and the appropriate ISP abuse contacts. I do expect many people who are fans of Eve will stand out in support of such attacks. Sad day for the EVE community I think when such defacements take place in the name of "support". Everybody is entitled to their views but enforcing them by WEB DEFACEMENTS is not to way to go about it.
HappyKitten Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:42:00 - [10] I have no idea about the other situations involved, but have a look at Space Gurl's posting history, and you will most likely totally agree with Sharkbait's modification.
Ediz Daxx FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:43:00 - [11] I still dont see any evidence!
SengH Black Omega Security E.R.A	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:44:00 - [12] i wonder if eve search stores unedited and undeleted threads... ill go take a lookie.
Merv Tring GeoTech	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:44:00 - [13] Sharkbait edited the text of that post to be very much in line with SpaceGurl's previous trolling history. Nothing wrong with that.
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:45:00 - [14] Originally by: Ediz Daxx I still dont see any evidence! The history logs and the image of Sharkbait encouraging "editing" of items to make somebody say "I suck" (in the image at the bottom of the web site and the first post). He also removed the thread to cover it up so he does not look so IMMATURE. I think it says alot. Ofcourse if you want to be blinkered, that is up to you. The appropriate action has been taken.
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Kimotoro Directive	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:46:00 - [15] Originally by: LauraBalls Originally by: Malthros Zenobia Edited by: Malthros Zenobia on 30/07/2006 08:36:45 One thing to say: IBTL. 'Space Gurl', hmm, why does that name set my troll-detector off? edit: That link is pathetic. 'Cyber vandalism'? God, that site's author is a freaking moron. Your personal views does not mean you have the right to attack somebodys site. Are you actually saying you support such actions? You do know what a wiki is right? You do? Good, then I don't have to explain to you how pathetic whining about a puublicly modable site is. Or are you going to try and argue that I 'vandalized' wikipedia when I edited the scientology entry to include links to articles dealing with people their members have killed (which got modded at an insane speed). Do I support the idea of a publicly editable site being edited by anyone? You bet I do. I think public wikis are nothing short of retarded, and people don't realize most entries in wikis are biased and often inaccurate. I'm curious, is Sharkbait 'zorck' and if so, how do you know this? That website's 'history' is about as clear as a lead shield in showing his 'guilt'.
Dem Bones Drunken Angels	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:46:00 - [16] Sharkbait, on the grassy knoll, with the lead pipe
Ediz Daxx FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:47:00 - [17] I dont care about the post.. youre accusing CCP of "Cyber Vandalism"(of Doom?).. so evidence please.
Splagada Minmatar	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:47:00 - [18] Edited by: Splagada on 30/07/2006 08:47:53 chill a bit serious, i dont see the huge freaking thing there... he edited a post of a troll, that's it or am i missing the point? - Looking for technetium delivery contracts
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:47:00 - [19] Edited by: LauraBalls on 30/07/2006 08:47:08 Originally by: Malthros Zenobia Originally by: LauraBalls Originally by: Malthros Zenobia Edited by: Malthros Zenobia on 30/07/2006 08:36:45 One thing to say: IBTL. 'Space Gurl', hmm, why does that name set my troll-detector off? edit: That link is pathetic. 'Cyber vandalism'? God, that site's author is a freaking moron. Your personal views does not mean you have the right to attack somebodys site. Are you actually saying you support such actions? You do know what a wiki is right? You do? Good, then I don't have to explain to you how pathetic whining about a puublicly modable site is. Or are you going to try and argue that I 'vandalized' wikipedia when I edited the scientology entry to include links to articles dealing with people their members have killed (which got modded at an insane speed). Do I support the idea of a publicly editable site being edited by anyone? You bet I do. I think public wikis are nothing short of retarded, and people don't realize most entries in wikis are biased and often inaccurate. I'm curious, is Sharkbait 'zorck' and if so, how do you know this? That website's 'history' is about as clear as a lead shield in showing his 'guilt'. A Wiki yes for editing for the topic, clearly in the LOGS it shows NEGATIVE DEFACEMENT for the purpose of HARASSMENT. Thank you. Nice try but no dice. The wiki was locked down at a later point so nobody could edit but they continued to hack it via whatever means and tried to remove the history logging.
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:48:00 - [20] Originally by: Splagada chill a bit serious, i dont see the huge freaking thing there... he edited a post of a troll, that's it Which prompted the defacement of the wiki as it openly encouraged tampering and negative editing. He should be more careful of his actions in a community if minors who see such actions as a way to release their tantrums.
d0omer	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:48:00 - [21] I think your missing the point... nobody cares...
Ediz Daxx FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:49:00 - [22] Edited by: Ediz Daxx on 30/07/2006 08:49:53 Pew pew pew! Edit: Anonymous edit not permitted Damnit =(
LauraBalls	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:49:00 - [23] Originally by: d0omer I think your missing the point... nobody cares... That is your opinion, CCP has been informed and the relevant ISP's have been notified of the offending IP's.
Merv Tring GeoTech	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:50:00 - [24] I LOKED AT TEH PARTITIAL RESTOR AND ZOMG HOW WILL I HAXOR EVE NOES OH NO :( :( :( :(
Omber Zombie Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:50:00 - [25] wait, let me get this right, modding a post on the forums you run is 'encouraging cyber vandalism'? ----------------------
HappyKitten Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:51:00 - [26] The original post read as simply a link to the site, now taken down. The site contained information about the deconstruction of the eve client, in a way which, if used for any purpose (or maybe even by just existing) is a breach of the EULA. Also, I wholeheartedly support the banning of the person responsible for thest posts: Linkage Linkage Linkage Linkage Linkage, removed from the official forum
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:51:00 - [27] Where does he encourage web defacements? And I felt editing that post was funny. Sorry if my maturity level is not up to your standards. --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
d0omer	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:51:00 - [28] Originally by: LauraBalls Originally by: d0omer I think your missing the point... nobody cares... That is your opinion, CCP has been informed and the relevant ISP's have been notified of the offending IP's. Do you really think CCP care what you think? Wow you must really be important?
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Kimotoro Directive	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:51:00 - [29] Originally by: LauraBalls Edited by: LauraBalls on 30/07/2006 08:42:40 Originally by: Merv Tring Do you have any evidence that Sharkie did anything but ban a ridiculously annoying troll? Any evidence at all? The tiniest little scrap will do. As you can see clearly on the website an image of his immaturity on the forums by editing customers posts to make them say something they did not say and encouraging childish behaviour by defacements which soon followed from various IP's which have been reported to CCP and the appropriate ISP abuse contacts. I do expect many people who are fans of Eve will stand out in support of such attacks. Sad day for the EVE community I think when such defacements take place in the name of "support". Everybody is entitled to their views but enforcing them by WEB DEFACEMENTS is not to way to go about it. You know what, ignore my previous posts. You LauraBells, are a moron. I'll leave it at that. SpaceGurl is nothing but a trolling alt, and while I have stron reason to believe that you're SpaceGurl, with a bruised, troll-like ego, I honestly don't care anymore for your opinion about him. SpaceGurl's a moron and a troll, and that site you link to has no proof of any damage done to it by CCP. You're doing nothing but slandering Shark and CCP. I completely support any modding shark did to Spacegurl's forum post, and TBH, I wish the forum mods would do it to trolling alts to make them look like the asses they are. Now, unless you have more than a very funny edit to a troll's thread, or a wiki whose color scheme hurts my eyes and a usless history, to show CCP 'vandalism', STFU.
SengH Black Omega Security E.R.A	Posted - 2006.07.30 08:52:00 - [30] umm if you click on the other links i actually think thats a decompiled blue.dll ....

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.