ITT: Established sov alliances want dense, fortified space cities where they and their renters can rat in safety, away from the scary fozzie-ceptor gangs. Also, sprinkling about npc stations literally everywhere to counter any power projection nerf would be greeaaaat.

Oh, and much faux-concern over the hypothetical small, independent sov entity, with little actual change to the existing coalition meta.

we play to win, which is why we're kings of the west and you're in an npc corp

we do not just decide to pointlessly cripple ourselves in the hopes that our suffering will convince ccp to fix it

we dominate all lesser people as viciously as possible with the broken mechanic so that their suffering will convince ccp to fix it

Nullsec leaders holding conquerable space have come together to put forth an open letter to CCP expressing their dissatisfaction with the Dominion sovereignty system and stating their support for occupancy-based sovereignty mechanics. The letter further states a need for more NPC 0.0 space within conquerable regions for the sake of increasing activity in 0.0, especially much-needed small-scale combat, as a lot of conquerable systems are over 25 jumps from NPC space. Lastly, to support the concept of occupancy-based sovereignty, the need for an expansion of systems to support more player density is also expressed.

This statement has been signed by the leaders of the constituent alliances of the CFC, N3 and HERO coalitions, those of non-coalition actors such as PL and Pizza, various current and former CSM delegates and community opinion leaders.

The open letter can be read here.

110 + is a joke

the best evidence that this is bunk is that people in nullsec aren't flocking to highsec to run missions.

They are perfectly happy to rat, run missions, anoms, etc... and to make more isk/hour than highsec. The SOE L4 highsec mission hubs are pretty darn empty. Nullsec doesn't need more isk, it needs for the big alliances to cast off their risk aversion and look for some big fights instead of one sided massacres.

This would be more compelling if your supercapital fleet wasn't sitting in drydock because your organization is far too risk averse to willingly commit it to a potentially even fight against N3/PL.....

It is not the renters SOV...it is PL's, CFC's, and NCDOT's SOV.

Our SOV, but the renters live there.

Maintaining it as it is would be easy even if the proposal was implemented. Just continue to own and control the alliances holding the SOV. Anyone not willing to be part of the SOV holding alliance will get dunked by the mother alliance/coalition if they try to gain a foothold. So on that part we probably agree (even though we most likely disagree on the details).

-said randoms have only ever lived in highsec or have never actually held 0.0 space

we dominate all lesser people as viciously as possible with the broken mechanic so that their suffering will convince ccp to fix it

ITT: Established sov alliances want dense, fortified space cities where they and their renters can rat in safety, away from the scary fozzie-ceptor gangs. Also, sprinkling about npc stations literally everywhere to counter any power projection nerf would be greeaaaat.

Oh, and much faux-concern over the hypothetical small, independent sov entity, with little actual change to the existing coalition meta.

Ok I was all for this concept. If it is being supported by goonies, then I have to admit I am a little nervous. Goonies never support anything they cannot exploit.

with strategic thinking like this it's such a shock mordus got flattened by two bored cfc squads as a lark

not like the combat squads, the ratting squad and the wannabe EG squad

This would be more compelling if your supercapital fleet wasn't sitting in drydock because your organization is far too risk averse to willingly commit it to a potentially even fight against N3/PL.....

Has anything changed at all after B-R besides the collapse of RUS and the expansion auf NA and HERO getting allowed (to be farmed) in catch?

I too rat for 24 hours a day instead of actually doing fun things, or eating, or sleeping. Get out

I see you ran out of arguments and have retreated to mud-flinging

Limit fights in system to 1 fleet per side. No broken servers. Actual skill of ppl fighting matters. If coalitions can't limit themselves to have a good time force them :>

Goons could have gone on the offensive after BR. Why didn't they? If the idea was to win and winning is controlling space, they showed how much they wanted to control that space by signing an agreement with the enemy just after destroying a good size of their opponent's force.

duuuuuude......

Limit fights in system to 1 fleet per side. No broken servers. Actual skill of ppl fighting matters. If coalitions can't limit themselves to have a good time force them :>

duuuuuude......

What part of that is mud flinging? Allowing any coalition to condense all of it's nullbears and renters into a couple of constellations or less is the definition of dense, fortified space cities. This would give a massive buff to the safety of your nullbears and renters.

Limit fights in system to 1 fleet per side. No broken servers. Actual skill of ppl fighting matters. If coalitions can't limit themselves to have a good time force them :>

This game was much better when 10 - 20 man gangs ruled the skies