| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon Cynosural Field Theory.
1424
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 11:04:41 -
[91] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:Remember that one time when I said Jarod Garamonde wrote:It's simple.... we ban the ISBoxers. and then it happened? Good times.
Necrothread...for the best reason...self adulation.
TunDraGon is recruiting!
"Also, your boobs [:o] " -á
CCP Eterne, 2012
"When in doubt...make a di++k joke."-áRobin Williams - RIP
|

Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
605
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 13:03:25 -
[92] - Quote
Thatt Guy wrote:wahhh....... mommy those people are better at this game than me, ban them mommy!!! wahhh.......
ISBoxer is legal. If you can't afford to use it,(or aren't smart enough) that's your problem. lrn2eve
jelly much?
Heh heh heh
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5544
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 13:05:38 -
[93] - Quote
Eugene Kerner wrote:Jarod Garamonde wrote:Remember that one time when I said Jarod Garamonde wrote:It's simple.... we ban the ISBoxers. and then it happened? Good times. Necrothread...for the best reason...self adulation.
Not empty-quoting.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|

Leannor
Central Builders Incorporated Northern Associates.
16
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 13:11:32 -
[94] - Quote
Aerakis Koskanaiken wrote:I read that there may be/is a nerf bat somewhere ready to take a swing at bombers. I've only recently started flying them, and have already seen how insanely effective they are for wiping out entire fleets with little to no counter available. There are a lot of fits and ship types which may be excluded from doctrines/fun fleets because a handful of bombers will wipe them out.
From your experiences, do bombers need a nerf? If they do, what do you the players think the best way to bring them back into balance would be? Interested to hear what others think.
and you wonder why they are the subject of a nerf? lol
"Lykouleon wrote:
STOP
TOUCHING
ICONIC
SHIP
PARTS"
|

Leannor
Central Builders Incorporated Northern Associates.
16
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 13:15:47 -
[95] - Quote
Ormand Audel wrote:Soldarius wrote:Armor tanks have skills that reduce their penalties. Why do shields not have skills to reduce their sigRad penalties? CCP, give us a skill to reduce the sigRad penalty of shield extenders. There is already one for shield rigs. (Shield Rigging) Because shields have passive regen is my guess. E: Actually, I thought about that a bit more and the equivalent of passive regen for armor is the large buffer.. So I suppose a skill makes sense? And Jarod, ISBoxer isn't being banned. Certain features are, but it's not isboxer specific.
I'm new to this whole boxer thing and argument. Though from what little I've gleaned it would seem to be a third party mechanism that fits under the same ban as the macros miners of old? The fact it's apparently legal clearly means it's not ... but I'm curious how it manages to side step it. Any genuine volunteers to explain it better and breifly?
NB, ... I don't care what people do to do stuff in game ... that's for CCP to worry about. I'm just concerned with dealing with what I see in front of me in game, be that one ship or ten's of ships ... 'how' they're controlled makes diddly squat to me. :)
"Lykouleon wrote:
STOP
TOUCHING
ICONIC
SHIP
PARTS"
|

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
2268
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 15:53:40 -
[96] - Quote
Ormand Audel wrote: And Jarod, ISBoxer isn't being banned. Certain features are, but it's not isboxer specific.
Close enough....
That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...
[#savethelance]
|

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2236
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 21:01:13 -
[97] - Quote
You should be more upset at 200 people sitting in none place ganking small gangs then 5 bomber pilots wiping out a fleet of drooling F1 monkeys sitting on one place with no counters besides n+1.
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~
|

45thtiger 0109
AL3XAND3R.
115
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 22:46:09 -
[98] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Ban ISBoxers.
Bombers fixed. Mining Fixed. ISBoxer whine threads fixed.
Its like killing the Batman. Its simple and literally solves everything.
You Mean ISBombers  
**You Have to take the good with the bad
and the bad with the good.
Welcome to EvE OnLiNe**
|

knobber Jobbler
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
479
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 23:46:26 -
[99] - Quote
Vel'drinn wrote:Covert cloakies decloaking each other would suck by proximity. As is you have the challenge level of one dude failing to engage his cloak in large fleets wrecking a shot at a bombing run. Fleet movements are not going to be manageable in anything greater than a squad. I don't get the regression in mechanics, these fleets are DESIGNED to be sneaky and people are not supposed to like them. This is especially true for anchored fleets.
This is just going to making covert fleets annoying to fly. You won't have time to get everyone setup on their own tacs and bomb spots before bombing fleets. The battlefield may change too much in that time but its more about the time to set things up properly.
Warpins at range by squad to launch bombs is going to expose the whole fleet a lot more. I'm sure bomber FCs are getting nightmares thinking about it. Decloaking is simply going to take a lot of fun with bomber fleets right out. Pulling off a good run takes planning and skill. The concepts are simple enough but those that consistently pull them off know the intricacies of bombing runs and the limitations of the most fragile frigates in game.
Furthermore, bombers are a weapon in the world of coalitions that allow the few to take on the many. I would like to get a dev blog that really highlights 'the problem' as all I see here are distractions towards other issues.
We did it before the change well enough, in fleets. Man up, learn how to use bombers without the training wheels. |

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
isd community communications liaisons
3494
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 04:23:19 -
[100] - Quote
Removed some off topic posts.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
Captain
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|

Blastcaps Madullier
Royal Black Watch Highlanders DARKNESS.
157
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 11:33:07 -
[101] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:No one really had a problem with bombers until they stopped decloaking one another and could be isboxed. Just sayin'.
Actually potato iirc CCP said that was a bug, which they fixed as it effected more than just bombers... |

Hevymetal
Eve Defence Force Cult of War
398
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 14:27:52 -
[102] - Quote
The proper nerf has been announced and will soon be deployed.
The banning of ISO boxer accounts.
|

Soldarius
Deadman W0nderland The 99 Percent
893
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 16:10:39 -
[103] - Quote
Proposed changes to cloaking reverted. Multiplexing/broadcasting banned. Bombers still got more base tank and fitting with only slightly worse agility. Bomber net buff.
Bomb flight time and velocity slightly adjusted. Very slight nerf.
Final tally: Slight buff.
http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY
|

Lister Dax
Intergalactic Trade and Harm
23
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 16:35:29 -
[104] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:Remember that one time when I said Jarod Garamonde wrote:It's simple.... we ban the ISBoxers. and then it happened? Good times.
Except they didn't...... |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5753
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 16:59:26 -
[105] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:You should be more upset at 200 people sitting in none place ganking small gangs then 5 bomber pilots wiping out a fleet of drooling F1 monkeys sitting on one place with no counters besides n+1.
QFT
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4452
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 17:55:10 -
[106] - Quote
Soldarius wrote:Proposed changes to cloaking reverted. Multiplexing/broadcasting banned. Bombers still got more base tank and fitting with only slightly worse agility. Bomber net buff.
Bomb flight time and velocity slightly adjusted. Very slight nerf.
Final tally: Slight buff. Indeed. They took the most overpowered class of ship and made it slightly more powerful. CCP: 1, Balance: 0
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp Vae. Victis.
6060
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 20:58:49 -
[107] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Soldarius wrote:Proposed changes to cloaking reverted. Multiplexing/broadcasting banned. Bombers still got more base tank and fitting with only slightly worse agility. Bomber net buff.
Bomb flight time and velocity slightly adjusted. Very slight nerf.
Final tally: Slight buff. Indeed. They took the most overpowered class of ship and made it slightly more powerful. CCP: 1, Balance: 0 By removing what was the most abused part of the bomber equation. That being the ability for one person to effectively fly a fleet of bombers effortlessly with the broadcast capabilities of ISBoxer.
It can still be done if you are well organized, but the chances for error are much higher now... and of course a gang of individual pilots is dangerous if well organized.
View the latest EVE Online developments and War Thunder game play by visiting Ranger 1 Presents.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |