| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
My suggestion is the creation of a system (weather faction warfare enlistment style or just simple ESC menu selection), that the players would have the ability to choose to "belong" to making them a valid target ANYWHERE to everyone else that chose the same option.
Lets imagine I chose to belong to the "Villains of East" (which is a cute name I decided to call this thing), and you chose the same option on your ESC menu (for example), when we see each other in jita we can attack with no penalty at all (just like wardec).
This would make the PvP in eve happen a LOT easier and frequently without cause any damage to all of those that do not want to participate :)
So what do you say now?
EDIT: Its obviously CCP would limit the use of this system by delaying the "activation/ deactivation" of it by like say 2 hours, and limit the changing ability for 1 or 2 times per every 24 hour cycle :)
EDIT#2: I just remember that there could be channels incursion like, where people that opt to PvP mode would automatically join. That way Id be posting LF LOGI, etc etc.. and people could hang out for the drama and laughs. |

Jita Alt666
576
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
So If I joined a group that chose to never select said option would I be safe from all war decs ever? |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:So If I joined a group that chose to never select said option would I be safe from all war decs ever?
Nah bro, this has nothing to do with wardecs.
Next dumb question please, go.. |

Krios Ahzek
Juvenis Iratus
152
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:My suggestion is the creation of a system (weather faction warfare enlistment style or just simple ESC menu selection), that the players would have the ability to choose to "belong" to making them a valid target ANYWHERE to everyone else that chose the same option.
Lets imagine I chose to belong to the "Villains of East" (which is a cute name I decided to call this thing), and you chose the same option on your ESC menu (for example), when we see each other in jita we can attack with no penalty at all !
Let's say we call these groups of yours corporations.
And we call this system of yours wardecs.
...
I rest my case. I live, I post, I slay. I am content. |

mkint
396
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
I wtf say you put this in the wrong forumz. You mean to be in the "I whine sweet sweet ragequit tears but don't have the guts to follow through" forumz. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Krios Ahzek wrote:THXBYE wrote:My suggestion is the creation of a system (weather faction warfare enlistment style or just simple ESC menu selection), that the players would have the ability to choose to "belong" to making them a valid target ANYWHERE to everyone else that chose the same option.
Lets imagine I chose to belong to the "Villains of East" (which is a cute name I decided to call this thing), and you chose the same option on your ESC menu (for example), when we see each other in jita we can attack with no penalty at all ! Let's say we call these groups of yours corporations. And we call this system of yours wardecs. ... I rest my case.
Once again totally different from what Im talking about, this is individually personally and you dont know who is on this group, you just travel around when all of a sudden you see someone red.
Edit: Please stay polite, CCP Phantom. |

Sickburn
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
This should be on the stupid idea forum |

T' Elk
SniggWaffe
175
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Best trollthread ever. 11/10 God wears-áRay Ban Aviators. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sickburn wrote:This should be on the stupid idea forum
Explain why or gtfo.
T' Elk wrote:Best trollthread ever. 11/10
Not at all bro. Being serious, this is a great idea and I still havent seen one single reasonable answer to it in this thread other than a bunch forum losers station afkers flawed stupidity. |

Jonni Favorite
Sundown Logistics SpaceMonkey's Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Interesting idea, or you can drop a can in Jita 4.4 labeled *steal this for pvp*.. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1039
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
it's called the EC-P8R gate in Torrinos |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1039
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:42:00 -
[12] - Quote
so can I participate in this and bring along a scimitar alt that isn't participating in this "free-for-all system" and use it to rep my main that is? |

Vandy ColdStone
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Andski wrote:so can I participate
No. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 01:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jonni Favorite wrote:Interesting idea, or you can drop a can in Jita 4.4 labeled *steal this for pvp*..
Dropping a can?? lol That method is used to circumvent the concord rules in order to freely attack one predefined target gz christ. Its old, its primitive and needs to go away as one of the few options you can fight someone in highsec.
Also it doesnt have the surprising factor and its not even called "hunting" for pvp which is one of the most funnier parts of it.
I would like to hear people that actually pvp in eve, people from 0.0 or a good piracy/wardec corp.
Edit: Please stay polite, CCP Phantom. |

Poetic Stanziel
Arrakis Technology
381
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 02:00:00 -
[15] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:... weather faction warfare enlistment style ... Your spelling is not, though.
Today I lost my common sense, It slipped away between Amamake and Rens, I think it happened in highsec, Using a Brutix to gank a Providence. -- Flunk |

mkint
396
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 02:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Jonni Favorite wrote:Interesting idea, or you can drop a can in Jita 4.4 labeled *steal this for pvp*.. Dropping a can?? lol That method is used to circumvent the concord rules in order to freely attack one predefined target gz christ. Its old, its primitive and needs to go away as one of the few options you can fight someone in highsec. Also it doesnt have the surprising factor and its not even called "hunting" for pvp which is one of the most funnier parts of it. I would like to hear people that actually pvp in eve, people from 0.0 or a good piracy/wardec corp, instead of jita afkers that once in awhile go outside of a station tying to make someone steal from a CAN in order to fight him and call it PvP .. lol Noobs are hilarious. Scroll all the way to the very tippy top like a big boy and tell us what forum section this is. Big boys post in the right forum sections. You want to wear big boy pants don't you?
Feature Ideas posted in General Discussion don't deserve serious discussion. |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
111
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 02:20:00 -
[17] - Quote
Andski wrote:so can I participate in this and bring along a scimitar alt that isn't participating in this "free-for-all system" and use it to rep my main that is?
Of course you can't, this is clearly a highsec mechanic so obviously you will need 5 maxed out neutral guardians with high grade grail sets in order to be competitive. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 03:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
Somebody move this god dam thread to the right place ty?? |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 03:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
RvB |

Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
490
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 03:52:00 -
[20] - Quote
I like it. Your attackable to anyone who has this option. Get to know people who do it, form up fleets from chat channels and such. Turn it on some days off the next and just go out a hunt with friends from time to time.
It would be fun.
|

T' Elk
SniggWaffe
175
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 03:54:00 -
[21] - Quote
The man has a point. God wears-áRay Ban Aviators. |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
196
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 04:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
This^^
Also, come to nullsec, you won't need to set any flags or steal from cans.
The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

Heimdallofasgard
APEX ARDENT COALITION NEM3SIS.
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 04:22:00 -
[23] - Quote
Yeah... this would be a stupid and redundant game mechanic for most of the reasons already explained. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 05:11:00 -
[24] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:This^^ Also, come to nullsec, you won't need to set any flags or steal from cans.
FW also works, but... >>> Every FW is broken whine thread ever. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 05:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
[quoteThorn Galen][qT' Elk]RubyPorto]RvB The man has a point.[/quote
This^^
Also, come to nullsec, you won't need to set any flags or steal from cans. [/quote]
FW also works, but... >>> Every FW is broken whine thread ever.[/quote]
FW in highsec? In Jita? Or in your system when you mine or mission in highsec? Dude just leave. Besides many other aspects Im not even gonna mention about fw.
If you are a noob dont post in my thread please kthx.
[quoteThorn Galen][quoteT' Elk]RubyPorto wrote:RvB[/quote The man has a point.[/quote
This^^
Also, come to nullsec, you won't need to set any flags or steal from cans.
You never flew in 0.0 since you have no idea that this is completely different from 0.0 pvp and the most important of it is all of the people that DONT want to go to 0.0 alone just because they are trying to get a fight, better just stay in jita and can flip like most do.
It is more of a form of play other than go to 0.0 just to pvp and most likely be killed on the first stargate jump, then show up in the station cause you were podded too.
This is for all the people that rather play in highsec but dont wanna be envolved in extreme pvp or belong to a pvp alliance but at the same time go for a hunt from time to time and enjoy pvp.
I myself have played eve in all possible ways you can imagine since lates 2006 and find this a pretty interesting and funny idea to just fly in highsec in your vagabond looking for targets without bothering those who do not want to be bothered.
Now all of you basement dwellers tell me how would something like this affect you if it was implemented and you dont wanna participate in?? Simply dont choose PvP mode and keep playing the same way you're doing now. Theres no possible reason to say no to something like this.
If you play WoW you can choose different types of servers PvE, PvP, roleplay, etc... and once you play in PvP servers you will see how funny it is to be playing knowing that someone can show up and kill you at any time.
Alara IonStorm wrote:I like it. Your attackable to anyone who has this option. Get to know people who do it, form up fleets from chat channels and such. Turn it on some days off the next and just go out a hunt with friends from time to time.
It would be fun.
THANK YOU, thats totally my point.
0.0 is totally different than this (blues and reds bobbles ?? ).. yea right wardecs are totally different than this (corp A against corp B ??) .. yea right faction warfare ?? .. im not even gonna comment
.. I have yet to read a good reasonable argument to deny this. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
406
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 05:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
I cannot wait for the CCLs to get selected.
|

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 05:34:00 -
[27] - Quote
THXBYE wrote: FW in highsec? In Jita? Or in your system when you mine or mission in highsec? Dude just leave. Besides many other aspects Im not even gonna mention about fw.
If you are a noob dont post in my thread please kthx.
Learn the mechanics of the game you play. If you join FW you are a valid target everywhere. Your enemy faction FW pilots are valid targets everywhere. Drrrrrrrrrr
Quote:
You never flew in 0.0 since you have no idea that this is completely different from 0.0 pvp and the most important of it is all of the people that DONT want to go to 0.0 alone just because they are trying to get a fight, better just stay in jita and can flip like most do.
It is more of a form of play other than go to 0.0 just to pvp and most likely be killed on the first stargate jump, then show up in the station cause you were podded too.
This is for all the people that rather play in highsec but dont wanna be envolved in extreme pvp or belong to a pvp alliance but at the same time go for a hunt from time to time and enjoy pvp.
You just described Lowsec.
Quote: I myself have played eve in all possible ways you can imagine since lates 2006 and find this a pretty interesting and funny idea to just fly in highsec in your vagabond looking for targets without bothering those who do not want to be bothered.
Now all of you basement dwellers tell me how would something like this affect you if it was implemented and you dont wanna participate in?? Simply dont choose PvP mode and keep playing the same way you're doing now. Theres no possible reason to say no to something like this.
If you play WoW you can choose different types of servers PvE, PvP, roleplay, etc... and once you play in PvP servers you will see how funny it is to be playing knowing that someone can show up and kill you at any time.[/b]
1. Doubt it. 2. Waste of Dev resources 3. Funny how that's how Eve works all the time. No need for a special server.
Quote:
0.0 is totally different than this (blues and reds bobbles ?? ).. yea right wardecs are totally different than this (corp A against corp B ??) .. yea right faction warfare ?? .. im not even gonna comment .. I have yet to read a good reasonable argument to deny this.
1. Try NPC null 2. RvB. Click Join, you're now a target. Quit, not a target. Exactly how your system works. 3. FW As above + some bonus content 4. FOR THE MOTHER OF ALL THINGS HOLY LAY OFF THE BOLD BUTTON |

Aggressive Nutmeg
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 05:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Dumb people should be banned from these forums or at least prohibited to post. I agree with this bit. 
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
187
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 06:54:00 -
[29] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Dumb people should be banned from these forums or at least prohibited to post.
Oh, irony.
|

DelBoy Trades
Enslave. GIANTSBANE.
59
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 07:01:00 -
[30] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:My suggestion is the creation of a system (weather faction warfare enlistment style or just simple ESC menu selection), that the players would have the ability to choose to "belong" to making them a valid target ANYWHERE to everyone else that chose the same option.
Lets imagine I chose to belong to the "Villains of East" (which is a cute name I decided to call this thing), and you chose the same option on your ESC menu (for example), when we see each other in jita we can attack with no penalty at all (just like wardec).
This would make the PvP in eve happen a LOT easier and frequently without cause any damage to all of those that do not want to participate :)
So wtf you say now?
EDIT: Its obviously CCP would limit the use of this system by delaying the "activation/ deactivation" of it by like say 2 hours, and limit the changing ability for 1 or 2 times per every 24 hour cycle :)
Im so god dam pro!!!
EDIT#2: I just remember that there could be channels incursion like, where people that opt to PvP mode would automatically join. That way Id be posting LF LOGI, etc etc.. and people could hang out for the drama and laughs.
  
http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/photos/images/original/000/131/351/eb6.jpg?1307463786
|

Jonni Favorite
Sundown Logistics SpaceMonkey's Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 07:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:THXBYE wrote:Dumb people should be banned from these forums or at least prohibited to post. Oh, irony.
How quickly this thread would be shut tomorrow if this were the case.. |

Mr Deepthought
Definitive Exploration and Excavations Drama Flakes
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 07:13:00 -
[32] - Quote
so you basically copied the 'wow' flag pvp system. ******* brilliant |

Jita Alt666
576
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 07:30:00 -
[33] - Quote
Perhaps you should go back, and edit your (terrible) OP thread, so that it is written clearly, with solid syntax, correct grammar and using terminology common to the community of the MMORPG Eve Online. |

FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 08:29:00 -
[34] - Quote
lol OP was dropped on his head.
He thinks his idea is a unique and special one above scrutiny and if you compare it to the large amount of pvp options in game you are a ******. |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
79
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:20:00 -
[35] - Quote
0/10 OP
Now go back to Wow and give me your stuff...
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
199
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:24:00 -
[36] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:My suggestion is the creation of a system (weather faction warfare enlistment style or just simple ESC menu selection), that the players would have the ability to choose to "belong" to making them a valid target ANYWHERE to everyone else that chose the same option.
Lets imagine I chose to belong to the "Villains of East" (which is a cute name I decided to call this thing), and you chose the same option on your ESC menu (for example), when we see each other in jita we can attack with no penalty at all (just like wardec).
This would make the PvP in eve happen a LOT easier and frequently without cause any damage to all of those that do not want to participate :)
So wtf you say now?
EDIT: Its obviously CCP would limit the use of this system by delaying the "activation/ deactivation" of it by like say 2 hours, and limit the changing ability for 1 or 2 times per every 24 hour cycle :)
Im so god dam pro!!!
EDIT#2: I just remember that there could be channels incursion like, where people that opt to PvP mode would automatically join. That way Id be posting LF LOGI, etc etc.. and people could hang out for the drama and laughs.
Go away |

Alexandros Balfros
Liberty Rogues
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Krios Ahzek wrote:THXBYE wrote:My suggestion is the creation of a system (weather faction warfare enlistment style or just simple ESC menu selection), that the players would have the ability to choose to "belong" to making them a valid target ANYWHERE to everyone else that chose the same option.
Lets imagine I chose to belong to the "Villains of East" (which is a cute name I decided to call this thing), and you chose the same option on your ESC menu (for example), when we see each other in jita we can attack with no penalty at all ! Let's say we call these groups of yours corporations. And we call this system of yours wardecs. ... I rest my case. Once again totally different from what Im talking about you fucknut, this is individually personally and you dont know who is on this group, you just travel around when all of a sudden you see someone red. Dumb people should be banned from these forums or at least prohibited to post.
The above people banned from posting would include you for calling someone a fucknut, and we actually have a second system that handles this, we call it low sec you might wanna try it, anyone is free to shoot anywhere without concord intervention, you might like it ;) |

Halcyon Ingenium
The Randomites
30
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:37:00 -
[38] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:My suggestion is the creation of a system (weather faction warfare enlistment style or just simple ESC menu selection), that the players would have the ability to choose to "belong" to making them a valid target ANYWHERE to everyone else that chose the same option.
Lets imagine I chose to belong to the "Villains of East" (which is a cute name I decided to call this thing), and you chose the same option on your ESC menu (for example), when we see each other in jita we can attack with no penalty at all (just like wardec).
This would make the PvP in eve happen a LOT easier and frequently without cause any damage to all of those that do not want to participate :)
So wtf you say now?
EDIT: Its obviously CCP would limit the use of this system by delaying the "activation/ deactivation" of it by like say 2 hours, and limit the changing ability for 1 or 2 times per every 24 hour cycle :)
Im so god dam pro!!!
EDIT#2: I just remember that there could be channels incursion like, where people that opt to PvP mode would automatically join. That way Id be posting LF LOGI, etc etc.. and people could hang out for the drama and laughs.
It's called Red vs. Blue. And this thread belongs in the dumb idea forum.
People say things like: "Oh, you make so much money. What do you need any more for?" Well, actually, *****, I never asked for your opinion. I'll let you know when I have enough money. -Gene Simmons |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
83
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:So If I joined a group that chose to never select said option would I be safe from all war decs ever?
PvP flag, no thanks.
PvP system in this game works just "fine" for those who understand how the system works.
PvP flag is at its best unnecessary. You want PvP you give it time and find your target, you declare war on several corporation, or you just join one of the many mercenary groups currently works in EVE.
I can see pros for PvP flag as well, however its some artificial feature, which doesnt really cope with EVE.
That said well you have to actively contribute in-to "combat PvP" enviroment to get what you want, its no longer consensual but it requires effort into such.
In other word working as intended.
As for being allways flagged for other people : try to live in sov. null without being part of the blue-ball. |

Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
205
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:49:00 -
[40] - Quote
Nice trollthread.
kthxbye. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
83
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:55:00 -
[41] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote: Nice trollthread.
kthxbye.
indeed, i read it and responded to it before i looked who is the author.
My bad. |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
238

|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Moved from General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

baltec1
208
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 09:57:00 -
[43] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:
FW in highsec? In Jita? Or in your system when you mine or mission in highsec? Dude just leave. Besides many other aspects Im not even gonna mention about fw.
If you are a noob dont post in my thread please kthx.
I went and did a solo invasion of Gal highsec in my trusty geddon when I was in FW. I also took part in caracal plages of high sec.
Also RVB |

B0X
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 10:00:00 -
[44] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Somebody move this god dam thread to the right place ty??
The waste bin? |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 18:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
[quote=RubyPorto] Learn the mechanics of the game you play. If you join FW you are a valid target everywhere. Your enemy faction FW pilots are valid targets everywhere. Drrrrrrrrrr
[quote]
lmao you are a noob dude, jita afker, just gtfo of my thread if you have no idea about what you're talking about. Id like to see when did someone in FW was flying around in highsec looking for someone from a different FW to kill before being popped by the navy. . youre so ******* noob, disgusting..
The whole idea of this suggestion, is to bring and make the PvP experience of hunting down targets and/or living life in continuously danger, a lot more accessible to people living in highsec. Said that, apart from ALL other things different from this, you cant compare it to any form of pvp outside highsec to start with.
Having to steal from a CAN in order to shoot someone you already know is PvP ??? G T F O That **** is older than my grandma and its something in eve that MUST go away already, evolve ffs.
This would also make all of that people scared of lowsec/0.0 to become a little more familiar with pvp, targets hunting, etc..
Again, if you dont want this, dont choose "PvP Mode", if you want this choose "PvP Mode".
Simple, and theres nothing that it would affect anyhow all the inconsistent naysayers. |

Morgan North
The Wild Bunch Electus Matari
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 19:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Make people who have bounties on them not being able to get concord support if they are attacked... Or not? |

Spawne32
Omber Company IMPERIAL LEGI0N
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 23:30:00 -
[47] - Quote
If theres one thing i learned the most in eve, its that PVP happens the most to people who dont want to participate, and PVP players actively seek that out, rather then fighting other PVP players on their own terms, they would rather attack a transport ship instead. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 23:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
THXBYE wrote: lmao you are a noob dude, jita afker, just gtfo of my thread if you have no idea about what you're talking about. Id like to see when did someone in FW was flying around in highsec looking for someone from a different FW to kill before being popped by the navy. . youre so ******* noob, disgusting..
The whole idea of this suggestion, is to bring and make the PvP experience of hunting down targets and/or living life in continuously danger, a lot more accessible to people living in highsec. Said that, apart from ALL other things different from this, you cant compare it to any form of pvp outside highsec to start with.
Having to steal from a CAN in order to shoot someone you already know is PvP ??? G T F O That **** is older than my grandma and its something in eve that MUST go away already, evolve ffs.
Some clever people make a spectacular career of killing FW targets in hisec. The killboards don't lie (neither do Shakira's hips). While Faction police can be a PITA (I've had the -5 standings before), they're certainly not CONCORD.
Second. And I repeat myself, some enterprising players have created your system already. They call it RvB.
Third. I suppose I should shout something insulting here, so... MRAAA YU SO NOB, YOU PLAY SANDBOX BAD
Fourth. There are plenty of mechanics that allow you to shoot at each other without flipping a can first. If you don't like them, CCP Guard has a message for you here. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 00:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
Morgan North wrote:Make people who have bounties on them not being able to get concord support if they are attacked... Or not?
Where does that have anything to do with this thread? lol
RubyPorto wrote:Some clever people make a spectacular career of killing FW targets in hisec. The killboards don't lie (neither do Shakira's hips). While Faction police can be a PITA (I've had the -5 standings before), they're certainly not CONCORD. Second. And I repeat myself, some enterprising players have created your system already. They call it RvB. Third. I suppose I should shout something insulting here, so... MRAAA YU SO NOB, YOU PLAY SANDBOX BAD Fourth. There are plenty of mechanics that allow you to shoot at each other without flipping a can first. If you don't like them, CCP Guard has a message for you here.
This has absolutely nothing to do with 2 teams fighting, or I would have call it the proper name. This has no specific place in the entire universe to happen. This is 1 single person flying around with more people in fleet or not (doesnt matter) and can attack ANYONE that chose to be playing under that mode (lets call it PvP mode).
Spawne32 wrote:If theres one thing i learned the most in eve, its that PVP happens the most to people who dont want to participate, and PVP players actively seek that out, rather then fighting other PVP players on their own terms, they would rather attack a transport ship instead.
Good side note.
In between tons of good things it would bring to eve, I just remember about another one, which happens the same in WoW, which is when someone totally overpowered comparing to us comes and kills us while we are missioning for example, then we get mad and call our friends to come and kill him lol or wardec his corp etc.. more pvp more fights more drama more politics more relationships, more activity in an enormous amout of unused space,etc etc etc..
Also more contacts set to blue, more contacts set to red, contacts would have a meaning in highsec, etc etc etc.. I can reason with 1000 different things of why this is great idea.
You like it? Choose PvP mode. You dont like it? Dont click it. Period, theres no reason to deny it. If you are against it without a valid reason you are at minimum delusional. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 00:39:00 -
[50] - Quote
THXBYE wrote: You like it? Choose PvP mode. You dont like it? Dont click it. Period, theres no reason to deny it. If you are against it without a valid reason you are at minimum delusional.
Besides the fact that we've been trying to show you where to find the same content you want to add, there's the fact that a PvP tickbox wouldn't make sense from an RP POV, the waste of Dev Resources, and the implication for newbies that not ticking the box keeps them safe.
There are a lot of people making fairly well reasoned arguments against your idea. Your counterarguments have thus far boiled down to "WOW does it like that, so EVE should." Come up with a reason why you need this (besides your laziness [not going for RvB, or FW] and your fear [not wanting to leave Hisec]) and you might get some new responses. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 00:57:00 -
[51] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:THXBYE wrote: You like it? Choose PvP mode. You dont like it? Dont click it. Period, theres no reason to deny it. If you are against it without a valid reason you are at minimum delusional.
Besides the fact that we've been trying to show you where to find the same content you want to add, there's the fact that a PvP tickbox wouldn't make sense from an RP POV, the waste of Dev Resources, and the implication for newbies that not ticking the box keeps them safe. There are a lot of people making fairly well reasoned arguments against your idea. Your counterarguments have thus far boiled down to "WOW does it like that, so EVE should." Come up with a reason why you need this (besides your laziness [not going for RvB, or FW] and your fear [not wanting to leave Hisec]) and you might get some new responses.
Please refrain from posting in this thread any further and move on with your pathetic life. The ONLY reason I see and it was you is the devs resources part, all other posters all they did was posting irrelevant negativity and vague stupidity.
About you, well first of all you are not a DEV you dont know absolutely nothing whatsoever if its hard or not to implement something like this, all you are posting is broscience tiptop trash talk out of your mouth.
Besides as I said, it brings a LOT more value stuff into eve creating a much more dynamic environment and gaming enjoyment rather than if ANY downside.
As I said:
You like it? Choose PvP mode. You dont like it? Dont click it.
Im pretty sure many people would end up using it permanently, as well as other newer/scared players, would get in touch with pvp hunting and protection a LOT easier and more often.
For example, incursions was a GREAT idea from CCP, and yea its like raids on WoW. And what about it? Whats the problem of talking about WoW? Break that taboo in your mind, cause taboos limit your imagination and your personality from being the person you really wanna be, instead of a basement dweller.
Incursions make people get together, make scared pvp players to know what a fleet actually is and how everything works, its funny, it gives at least to 50% of all the players in this game to learn more about fittings and ships etc etc, while at the same time makes them feel more comfortable with the pvp and combat environment. |

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 01:08:00 -
[52] - Quote
Although having a little FFA in hi-sec may be an interesting idea - and I could see some potential benefits (i.e. exposing people to PvP in high-sec without necessarily doing it on a corp v corp or alliance v alliance basis; enticing missioners and miners to experience some PvP), what this would effectively do, in my opinion, is add a little more sandbox to PvP.
I'd rather like to see more people move to and roam in low-sec/0.0 which is deserted as it is than promote hi-sec PvP, which is lame in it's current form as it is. And before you go on about how your targets would be valid anywhere, let's face it... this would be an exclusively hi-sec PvP prospect.
Sorry... not supported. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 01:20:00 -
[53] - Quote
THXBYE wrote: Please refrain from posting in this thread any further and move on with your pathetic life. The ONLY reason I see and it was you is the devs resources part, all other posters all they did was posting irrelevant negativity and vague stupidity.
Disagreement isn't personal, and doesn't mean it's irrelevant. It's a part of presenting new ideas. Enjoy it.
Quote: About you, well first of all you are not a DEV you dont know absolutely nothing whatsoever if its hard or not to implement something like this, all you are posting is broscience tiptop trash talk out of your mouth.
It's more than zero effort to implement, agreed? In that case, I posit that it's resources that could be better spent elsewhere.
Quote: Besides as I said, it brings a LOT more value stuff into eve creating a much more dynamic environment and gaming enjoyment rather than if ANY downside.
You still need to show what void this fills. If you want consensual PvP, there are already options. If you want nonconsensual PvP there are options (which come with their own consequences).
Quote: As I said:
You like it? Choose PvP mode. You dont like it? Dont click it.
Im pretty sure many people would end up using it permanently, as well as other newer/scared players, would get in touch with pvp hunting and protection a LOT easier and more often.
First, The ability to skip content is not a good reason to implement that content. Turn it on to pew, off to make isk. No sane person makes their hauling/PvE riskier for no extra reward.
Quote: For example, incursions was a GREAT idea from CCP, and yea its like raids on WoW. And what about it? Whats the problem of talking about WoW? Break that taboo in your mind, cause taboos limit your imagination and your personality from being the person you really wanna be, instead of a basement dweller.
Incursions make people get together, make scared pvp players to know what a fleet actually is and how everything works, its funny, it gives at least to 50% of all the players in this game to learn more about fittings and ships etc etc, while at the same time makes them feel more comfortable with the pvp and combat environment.
I wasn't saying that it's a Bad idea because it's from WoW. I'm saying that just because WoW does something doesn't make it a Good idea.
And please keep this civil. I try to.
FAKE EDIT: Stupid 5 quote limit. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 01:24:00 -
[54] - Quote
Katie Frost wrote:Although having a little FFA in hi-sec may be an interesting idea - and I could see some potential benefits (i.e. exposing people to PvP in high-sec without necessarily doing it on a corp v corp or alliance v alliance basis; enticing missioners and miners to experience some PvP), what this would effectively do, in my opinion, is add a little more sandbox to PvP.
I'd rather like to see more people move to and roam in low-sec/0.0 which is deserted as it is than promote hi-sec PvP, which is lame in its current form. And before you go on about how your targets would be valid anywhere, let's face it... this would be an exclusively hi-sec PvP prospect.
Sorry... not supported.
100% agreed. And everything very well pointed out.
You are just forgetting 1 single thing, it is the fact that 0.0 is deserted cause most people in highsec is scared of it, in a way they do not want to even try it out.
Yes, this would be more directed and intended to highsec (and thats the whole purpose of it), but it could be very much applied to lowsec as well, and 0.0 since its already like that.
So lets say people do experience this kind of pvp in highsec, get familiar with it, and now they move to 0.0.
All Im saying is there is an extremely lack of PvP and action in highsec, limiting people from experiencing EvE as its supposed to be.
EvE = Everything Against Everything
Edit: On a side note not relevant; 0.0 is deserted cause there is no real connection between empire and 0.0, they are considered 2 different lifestyles which one can hardly belong to both of them at the same time. 0.0 has its goods and its cons, however empire has them too and more imo, theres more action more stuff to do, etc etc.. If they could come up with some genius idea to connect these 2 distant worlds maybe everything would become more universal and balanced. |

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 04:11:00 -
[55] - Quote
Going on a FFA roam through hi-sec/low-sec is very different than trying to break into 0.0...
The mechanics are different (bubbles, JBs etc). PvP is conducted in a different way and if you are a hi-sec carebear - yes the prospect of coming down to 0.0 to do some PvP is probably fairly scary. Whether what you are proposing is a way for hi-sec dwellers to get some PvP experience and maybe push them into low-sec and even 0.0...? I certainly doubt it.
It would be far more likely that this would sandbox PvP and people would be content to fly around hi-sec for a few hours killing stuff and thinking that they are PvP-ing before going back to their missions and beltsGǪ and when they think they are good enough to jump into 0.0 and warp to a gate, only to find themselves in a magical blue bubble and 10 people shooting at them; you can just hear them thinking: "Geez... why can't I warp out and why aren't these guys on my overview blinky red?! Ah screw this null-sec hacking... back to my barge and casual rifter PvP!"
Your idea has merits in its additional entertainment value for missioners, miners and bored PvPers in giving them something PvP-orientated to do in hi-sec with no strings attached. There is far more potential for this feature to close hi-sec off further than actually get people out of it.
I would much rather see players leave hi-sec than be given more reason to stay in it.
|

Spawne32
Omber Company IMPERIAL LEGI0N
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 05:01:00 -
[56] - Quote
bubbles and gate camps are the singular reason behind why null is a ghost land now, people cant get through the camps, again this all goes back to the great wall of high sec and the issue with griefers being catered to again with their buffs that CCP provides them. Before the time of gate bubbles there was alot more movement in and out of low and no security systems. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
62
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 05:11:00 -
[57] - Quote
Spawne32 wrote:bubbles and gate camps are the singular reason behind why null is a ghost land now, people cant get through the camps, again this all goes back to the great wall of high sec and the issue with griefers being catered to again with their buffs that CCP provides them. Before the time of gate bubbles there was alot more movement in and out of low and no security systems.
Bubbles and Gate camps are simply not as common as people seem to think. That said, I wouldn't want to try to live in Null without being part of a group... which is what Null has always been about. The ability to create an empire of players. Empire (both High and Low) doesn't actively punish soloers. The mechanics of Nullsec do. |

Nestara Aldent
EVE University Ivy League
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 06:14:00 -
[58] - Quote
Katie, you can't force a carebear to pvp. You just need to realize futility of attempting that. Just ask yourself why they haven't tried pvp already, or they don't pvp if they did, or will they just find another game if you force them to play in a way they don't want to? How would you feel if devs tried to force you to mine for example and you don't want that?
THXBYE, that WoW mechanic of pvp flagging have no place in this game, and has it's own issues. Here you're flagged for pvp everywhere and it should remain so. By changing that you'd change very much the essence of this game.
There are other games that have pvp flagging, if you don't like being flagged all the time. Just don't try to pass this as trying to make carebears to pvp, because that is impossible and even an oxymoron. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
62
|
Posted - 2011.11.29 06:20:00 -
[59] - Quote
Nestara Aldent wrote:Katie, you can't force a carebear to pvp. You just need to realize futility of attempting that. Just ask yourself why they haven't tried pvp already, or they don't pvp if they did, or will they just find another game if you force them to play in a way they don't want to? How would you feel if devs tried to force you to mine for example and you don't want that?
Sure there is. It's called an Alpha Tempest. or an Alpha Apoc (though that always makes me think I need to go to a community center for bad coffee) |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
36
|
Posted - 2011.12.12 15:18:00 -
[60] - Quote
Bump.
Id really like this implemented as soon as possible.
Its funny, doesnt hurt those who dont agree with, its one more exciting option of what we can do, its another pvp option, gives easy access to true pvp of hunting and/or survival, its an accessible opportunity for those a little more scared with which they can experiment, learn and be able to go and explore other areas in eve they've always feared. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

Epofhis
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.12 15:34:00 -
[61] - Quote
Thread title has failed to deliver. 0/10 |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
718
|
Posted - 2011.12.12 17:46:00 -
[62] - Quote
Hard to take the OP seriously when he's looking for more PvP yet won't leave high sec to find it.
Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
135
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 04:29:00 -
[63] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Bump.
Id really like this implemented as soon as possible.
Its funny, doesnt hurt those who dont agree with, its one more exciting option of what we can do, its another pvp option, gives easy access to true pvp of hunting and/or survival, its an accessible opportunity for those a little more scared with which they can experiment, learn and be able to go and explore other areas in eve they've always feared.
In order: No
It's Not funny, so you're wrong. It wastes resources, so you're wrong. It's not exciting, it's a **** copy of a proper PvP option, so you're wrong. Easy access is going to lowsec, joining FW, or joining RvB, so you're wrong. Scared people can experiment by doing one of the above in a cheap ship, so you're wrong. This does nothing to help people leave hisec, so you're wrong.
So in this, as in so many things, you're simply wrong.
tl;dr In time for the Christmas Holidays, Here's what your Idea is |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
36
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 04:59:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Hard to take the OP seriously when he's looking for more PvP yet won't leave high sec to find it.
This character has "lived" in 0.0 over 50% of its lifetime. Obviously you are a noob that cant check employment history correctly.
Epofhis wrote:Thread title has failed to deliver. 0/10
It might be hard to believe but it was made on purpose so people will hate on a good suggestion which would be nice to them. In other words they are hating and rejecting on their own wishes.
Its like making a thread giving isks to people, but call them idiots and losers. No one would want the isks because of their stupid pride.
Minnions..
Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
135
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 05:28:00 -
[65] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Ingvar Angst wrote:Hard to take the OP seriously when he's looking for more PvP yet won't leave high sec to find it.
This character has "lived" in 0.0 over 50% of its lifetime. Obviously you are a noob that cant check employment history correctly.
Nobody cares where you lived, the Idea is ******.
Epofhis wrote:Thread title has failed to deliver. 0/10
It might be hard to believe but it was made on purpose so people will hate on a good suggestion which would be nice to them. In other words they are hating and rejecting on their own wishes. [/quote]
If it weren't a ****** idea, it wouldn't be so soundly rejected by nearly everyone in the thread.
Sounds like UMADBRO and the age old "I'm not wrong cauze I wasn't srs, dudez" defense. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
36
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 10:03:00 -
[66] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:If it weren't a ****** idea, it wouldn't be so soundly rejected by nearly everyone in the thread.
Sounds like UMADBRO and the age old "I'm not wrong cauze I wasn't srs, dudez" defense.
You suffer from HPD dude. inb4yougooglehpd
Bump Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
135
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 11:27:00 -
[67] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:RubyPorto wrote:If it weren't a ****** idea, it wouldn't be so soundly rejected by nearly everyone in the thread.
Sounds like UMADBRO and the age old "I'm not wrong cauze I wasn't srs, dudez" defense. You suffer from HPD dude, but it seems it only brought the bad side of it on you lol inb4yougooglehpdBump Create this option now ccp, it doesnt hurt anyone that dont like, and will be one more path one can follow, in between many other things the close and easy and accessible pvp to everyone living in empire that want to try pvp at their own pace without leaving empire for now.
I did, and all I got was Houston Police Department. I'm not sure how I suffer at the hands of Houston Police Department when I live several states away from Texas, but if you say so, Please Help Save Me From the Houston Police!
I still have yet to see any reason why this *should* be developed. You're main argument seems to be that it doesn't hurt anyone which is not a good reason to add more structures in the sandbox.
Let me put it this way, say that Eve is a giant sandbox. It has some fixed toys in it, like monkey bars and a little rocking horse thing. The kids run around and spend as much or more time playing with each other as they do with the monkey bars and the rocking horse. The manager adds a slide. Now the kids play with each other a little less to fit the slide in. This goes on until all you have is a big jungle gym where the sandbox was and the kids have a hard time finding each other to play with, or just as bad, they don't have time between playing with each of the toys.
In a sandbox game you need a good, interesting reason to add *anything.* Create this option and what do you add to the game that *isn't* already availiable? PvP on Demand > RvB and Faction Warfare(needs a fix but still provides the PvP targets on demand) PvP in HiSec > RvB, Can Flipping, FW (if you're clever), Suicide Ganks, Organized Warfare A Sense of Danger > Suicide Ganks (inbound), Can Flippers, RvB*, FW* PvP at your Own pace > RvB, EUni's Lowsec Roams and occasional organized Wardecs
*While you're in it, but that limitation applies to your idea as well, since it's a toggle switch |

GeneralKool
Via Crucis Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 11:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
We should do this, its a good idea.
1. And we should make it so that there is special faction LP we can obtain during these fights.
2. we can use the special LP to buy upgraded mods for our ships(that we can redeem in a special room of a war station)
3. And break up eve into shards.
4. make it fighting between shards
5. make a special type of fleet called a raid.
6. rename EvE-Online to "Generic MMO number 4578001"
|

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
36
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 11:44:00 -
[69] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:THXBYE wrote:RubyPorto wrote:If it weren't a ****** idea, it wouldn't be so soundly rejected by nearly everyone in the thread.
Sounds like UMADBRO and the age old "I'm not wrong cauze I wasn't srs, dudez" defense. You suffer from HPD dude, but it seems it only brought the bad side of it on you lol inb4yougooglehpdBump Create this option now ccp, it doesnt hurt anyone that dont like, and will be one more path one can follow, in between many other things the close and easy and accessible pvp to everyone living in empire that want to try pvp at their own pace without leaving empire for now. I did, and all I got was Houston Police Department. I'm not sure how I suffer at the hands of Houston Police Department when I live several states away from Texas, but if you say so, Please Help Save Me From the Houston Police! I still have yet to see any reason why this *should* be developed. You're main argument seems to be that it doesn't hurt anyone which is not a good reason to add more structures in the sandbox. Let me put it this way, say that Eve is a giant sandbox. It has some fixed toys in it, like monkey bars and a little rocking horse thing. The kids run around and spend as much or more time playing with each other as they do with the monkey bars and the rocking horse. The manager adds a slide. Now the kids play with each other a little less to fit the slide in. This goes on until all you have is a big jungle gym where the sandbox was and the kids have a hard time finding each other to play with, or just as bad, they don't have time between playing with each of the toys. In a sandbox game you need a good, interesting reason to add *anything.* Create this option and what do you add to the game that *isn't* already availiable? PvP on Demand > RvB and Faction Warfare(needs a fix but still provides the PvP targets on demand) PvP in HiSec > RvB, Can Flipping, FW (if you're clever), Suicide Ganks, Organized Warfare A Sense of Danger > Suicide Ganks (inbound), Can Flippers, RvB*, FW* PvP at your Own pace > RvB, EUni's Lowsec Roams and occasional organized Wardecs *While you're in it, but that limitation applies to your idea as well, since it's a toggle switch
Who cares about RvB? I dont wanna belong to any corp/war/alliance or whatsoever battle between 2 major groups of people. Can flipping is PvP? Make me laugh noob. FW is lowsec to start with, besides it still fight between teams or gate camps etc, I dont want to belong to any team besides my friends. RvB already explained, I dont wanna go to lowsec as already explained as well.
Keep posting relevant stuff.
The universal pvp system would be nothing compared to anything existent at the moment in the game. Would affect no one whatsoever that dont use it, and just by that theres no reason in denying it.
All other aspects already explained in this thread. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
36
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 11:46:00 -
[70] - Quote
GeneralKool wrote:We should do this, its a good idea.
1. And we should make it so that there is special faction LP we can obtain during these fights.
2. we can use the special LP to buy upgraded mods for our ships(that we can redeem in a special room of a war station)
3. And break up eve into shards.
4. make it fighting between shards
5. make a special type of fleet called a raid.
6. rename EvE-Online to "Generic MMO number 4578001"
Conclusion:
Just an awful idea. PvP is available to you no matter where in the eve online universe.
If its not broken then don't fix it.
And you also shouldnt eat chicken because its good and everyone else does it. Your logic is flawed as ****. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

GeneralKool
Via Crucis Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 11:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:GeneralKool wrote:We should do this, its a good idea.
Conclusion:
Just an awful idea. PvP is available to you no matter where in the eve online universe.
If its not broken then don't fix it. And you also shouldnt eat chicken because its good and everyone else does it. Your logic is flawed as ****.
Can you just not see it? Can you not see why everyone is hating on your idea?
Its because its bad and everyone plays eve for what it is. You are hoping for a mechanic that doesn't add to the experience of what eve is. Your idea would just make eve feel more 'arcade style' |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
137
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 14:51:00 -
[72] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:
Who cares about RvB? I dont wanna belong to any corp/war/alliance or whatsoever battle between 2 major groups of people. Can flipping is PvP? Make me laugh noob. FW is lowsec to start with, besides it still fight between teams or gate camps etc, I dont want to belong to any team besides my friends. RvB already explained, I dont wanna go to lowsec as already explained as well.
Keep posting relevant stuff.
The universal pvp system would be nothing compared to anything existent at the moment in the game. Would affect no one whatsoever that dont use it, and just by that theres no reason in denying it.
All other aspects already explained in this thread.
1. Then Go to Lowsec or Nullsec, or get your friends and talk to some other group and arrange a wardec. 2. Can flipping is absolutely PvP. I am a Player, and I am Violating another Player. PVP 3. Then join FW as a corp with your friends and don't join organized fleets. 4. RvB is a bunch of groups of friends fighting a bunch of other groups of friends. They are not at all organized like you seem to think they are.
You can play EVE however you like and I think that's valid. But don't go adding slides to MY sandbox that I'm gonna go barking my shin against.
You want a PvP free for all, GO ORGANIZE IT. Make 5-6-20 corps all in mutual wardecs with each other. Gather people together and ask them to join the corps... have peace treaties between corps; allow/encourage lateral transfers between corps as the tides shift. Enforce people honoring 1v1s and other agreements by kick/bans from the corp. Organize it into your vision of this and gather like minded people. That gets you: 24 hour timer based toggleable PvP Channels to form fleets in Levels of combat (enforced the way Eve enforces all rules: Loosely) Valid target everywhere (to nearly everyone else around if you get enough to join you) |

RAND0M MORPH
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 22:30:00 -
[73] - Quote
So to clean things out and make it easier to picture, heres a resume:
PROS
- One more thing you can do in EvE - Dynamic Highsec real PvP, with hunting and survival and also the surprise element. - Easy access to what real PvP is to people living in highsec that do not want to belong to any corp or alliance or leave highsec for now. - A form of living - Kills the boredom to many people in game bringing a new breath taking activity for a moment or a form of playing the game at all times. - Connects a little bit more 0.0 experience and highsec, giving players an enthusiastic experience. - One more way to create fights and ships and modules and ammo consumption bringing healthy activity to the economy. - Many other pros..
CONS
- N/A
Its simple guys, you wanna try it? Use it. You dont like it and total disagree? Dont use it.
In opposite of sooo many other features in eve that not even 5% of all the players use, this one could and WILL be, if implemented, a much very used feature for a LOT of players, experienced and non experienced. I guarantee you that.
Imagine:
You are bored, you turn on this option and grab your rifter and go, you travel a couple jumps and you see a red in local, use your scan, use your alt to scan him, etc etc etc..
Its just an addition to eve, is not a change, this is not supposed to fix anything. |

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 23:11:00 -
[74] - Quote
[quote=Nestara Aldent]Katie, you can't force a carebear to pvp. You just need to realize futility of attempting that. Just ask yourself why they haven't tried pvp already, or they don't pvp if they did, or will they just find another game if you force them to play in a way they don't want to? How would you feel if devs tried to force you to mine for example and you don't want that?[quote]
Oh, don't get me wrong I do not want carebears to PvP - they can stay in high sec. I have no interest for players that opt to shoot little red crosses and asteroids and RP EVE as some form of actual entertainment in a computer game. I can however respect that this is their choice and they are free to make it.
There are also valid PvP opportunities in high-sec as indicated in previous posts. I am opposed to seeing another feature added to high-sec that should be and is native to low-sec and 0.0. If carebears want to undertake proper PvP, then get out of high-sec. If they want to pretend/safe-PvP, then there is FW, RvB, Wardecs - no need to add another toy in the sandbox that would simply fortify and increase the appeal of an area of EvE which apparently boasts ~80% of the active player base already.
This suggestion would be akin to me asking to have a flag system in 0.0, where if I have this flag I can mine and mission without anybody being able to attack me. Thereafter I would drop the said flag in order to go back to PvP and normal 0.0 activities.
EvE is much bigger than just high-sec and efforts/resources should be invested in expanding low-sec and 0.0.
|

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.13 23:52:00 -
[75] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:So to clean things out and make it easier to picture, heres a resume:
PROS
- One more thing you can do in EvE - Dynamic Highsec real PvP, with hunting and survival and also the surprise element. - Easy access to what real PvP is to people living in highsec that do not want to belong to any corp or alliance or leave highsec for now. - A form of living - Kills the boredom to many people in game bringing a new breath taking activity for a moment or a form of playing the game at all times. - Connects a little bit more 0.0 experience and highsec, giving players an enthusiastic experience. - One more way to create fights and ships and modules and ammo consumption bringing healthy activity to the economy. - Many other pros..
1) I don't quite understand your line of argument for this being a pro. Is EvE lacking things to do? I guess if you are poking asteroids all day, you may feel that EvE is a sterile game that needs additional entertainment features implemented. Alt-tab and play solitaire. 2) There is nothing 'real' or 'dynamic' about sandbox PvP. You may also try FW, RvB and wardecs. 3) Again nothing real about PvP in high-sec. You are talking about a very, very small group of people that (a) live in high sec; (b) do not want to belong to a corp/alliance; (c) are too scared to jump into low sec to PvP; (d) are interested in PvP. If this feature will accommodate this group of people, then there is no reason to spend game resources on it. Refer them to a therapist and deal with their anxieties pertaining to leaving high sec or joining a corp/alliance. 4) No... it's not a form of living at all. It's a fad that you undertake for a couple of hours before returning to your mission/belt. 5) Could not decipher the latter part of this point, but in relation to boredom of many people - if you want to PvP: low sec is just a few jumps away. Also there is FW, RvB, wardecs... 6) No... it actually disconnects people from real PvP and distances them from 0.0. But even if you consider the OP's suggestion as real PvP - if you had this in high sec, why would you ever want to go to 0.0 to experience it? 7) Or... populate regions of space that already have this mechanic implemented (low-sec, 0.0) and create an economic demand in these regions. Oh the ISK sinks that logistics and ship/module replacement costs in low-sec and 0.0 would create! 8) Many other retorts...
|

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
137
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 00:54:00 -
[76] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:So to clean things out and make it easier to picture, heres a resume:
PROS
- One more thing you can do in EvE - Dynamic Highsec real PvP, with hunting and survival and also the surprise element. - Easy access to what real PvP is to people living in highsec that do not want to belong to any corp or alliance or leave highsec for now. - A form of living - Kills the boredom to many people in game bringing a new breath taking activity for a moment or a form of playing the game at all times. - Connects a little bit more 0.0 experience and highsec, giving players an enthusiastic experience. - One more way to create fights and ships and modules and ammo consumption bringing healthy activity to the economy. - Many other pros..
CONS
- N/A
Its simple guys, you wanna try it? Use it. You dont like it and total disagree? Dont use it.
In opposite of sooo many other features in eve that not even 5% of all the players use, this one could and WILL be, if implemented, a much very used feature for a LOT of players, experienced and non experienced. I guarantee you that.
Imagine:
You are bored, you turn on this option and grab your rifter and go, you travel a couple jumps and you see a red in local, use your scan, use your alt to scan him, etc etc etc..
Its just an addition to eve, is not a change, this is not supposed to fix anything.
Sock Puppet Alt Detected.
CONS Adds a slide for me to Bark my Shin Against.
All of the "Pros" have been shown over and over to already exist, and I've explained exactly how you can set this "Feature" up yourself through existing game mechanics.
|

RAND0M MORPH
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 01:33:00 -
[77] - Quote
Katie Frost wrote:RAND0M MORPH wrote:So to clean things out and make it easier to picture, heres a resume:
PROS
- One more thing you can do in EvE - Dynamic Highsec real PvP, with hunting and survival and also the surprise element. - Easy access to what real PvP is to people living in highsec that do not want to belong to any corp or alliance or leave highsec for now. - A form of living - Kills the boredom to many people in game bringing a new breath taking activity for a moment or a form of playing the game at all times. - Connects a little bit more 0.0 experience and highsec, giving players an enthusiastic experience. - One more way to create fights and ships and modules and ammo consumption bringing healthy activity to the economy. - Many other pros..
1) I don't quite understand your line of argument for this being a pro. Is EvE lacking things to do? I guess if you are poking asteroids all day, you may feel that EvE is a sterile game that needs additional entertainment features implemented. Alt-tab and play solitaire. 2) There is nothing 'real' or 'dynamic' about sandbox PvP. You may also try FW, RvB and wardecs. 3) Again nothing real about PvP in high-sec. You are talking about a very, very small group of people that (a) live in high sec; (b) do not want to belong to a corp/alliance; (c) are too scared to jump into low sec to PvP; (d) are interested in PvP. If this feature will accommodate this group of people, then there is no reason to spend game resources on it. Refer them to a therapist and deal with their anxieties pertaining to leaving high sec or joining a corp/alliance. 4) No... it's not a form of living at all. It's a fad that you undertake for a couple of hours before returning to your mission/belt. 5) Could not decipher the latter part of this point, but in relation to boredom of many people - if you want to PvP: low sec is just a few jumps away. Also there is FW, RvB, wardecs... 6) No... it actually disconnects people from real PvP and distances them from 0.0. But even if you consider the OP's suggestion as real PvP - if you had this in high sec, why would you ever want to go to 0.0 to experience it? 7) Or... populate regions of space that already have this mechanic implemented (low-sec, 0.0) and create an economic demand in these regions. Oh the ISK sinks that logistics and ship/module replacement costs in low-sec and 0.0 would create! 8) Many other retorts...
1) How can 1 more thing to do ever be bad? Make sense. 2) Fw = lowsec .. I dont want lowsec.. RvB = War between 2 teams which I also have to belong to .. I dont wanna belong to anything I wanna ride free. (also RvB was created on purpose by players to do something similar to what this feature will do) Wardecs = Once again, war between 2 teams. 3) Neither you or anyone else in this thread is a DEV, and have no idea about whatsoever how hard or not it is to implement such feature. 4) Its a form of living if you wanna have it on at all times, which brings a great suspense and dynamic way of playing the game. 5) I dont want lowsec.. how many times I have to repeat all of this? 6) I dont want lowsec.. 8) Make sense
You still havent come up with ANY single argument of how this can be ever bad, but I proved many valid reasons of how this is a great feature.
Unless you are a DEV and say something like: This will be too hard to implement and is such feature is not in our plans for any time in the future"
Remember you are not a DEV, so give me reasons from a regular player point of view of how can this ever be bad, or just dont bother with this thread and move on. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
137
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 01:45:00 -
[78] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:[ 1) How can 1 more thing to do ever be bad? Make sense. 2) Fw = lowsec .. I dont want lowsec.. RvB = War between 2 teams which I also have to belong to .. I dont wanna belong to anything I wanna ride free. (also RvB was created on purpose by players to do something similar to what this feature will do) Wardecs = Once again, war between 2 teams. 3) Neither you or anyone else in this thread is a DEV, and have no idea about whatsoever how hard or not it is to implement such feature. 4) Its a form of living if you wanna have it on at all times, which brings a great suspense and dynamic way of playing the game. 5) I dont want lowsec.. how many times I have to repeat all of this? 6) I dont want lowsec.. 8) Make sense
You still havent come up with ANY single argument of how this can be ever bad, but I proved many valid reasons of how this is a great feature.
Unless you are a DEV and say something like: This will be too hard to implement and is such feature is not in our plans for any time in the future"
Remember you are not a DEV, so give me reasons from a regular player point of view of how can this ever be bad, or just dont bother with this thread and move on.
As I said before: 1) One more Slide to Bark my shin on in the SANDBOX 2) Why don't you want lowsec? That is the Casual PvP on demand space. RvB was created by players BECAUSE IT'S A SANDBOX AND THAT'S WHAT PLAYERS DO. 3) If it's not already implemented, it will take some non zero amount of Dev resources. That is too many Dev resources to waste. 4) You just described life in Lowsec; Remind me again why you don't want to set foot there? 5) You keep describing implementing Lowsec-for-some-people in hisec, why u scared of lowsec? 6) GOTO 5 7) The meme is "There is No 6" 8) Many other UMADS
It's bad because it adds nothing to the game that doesn't exist; It takes away from Lowsec's last real purpose; and It kills the possibility of Players creating this content themselves (like they HAVE in RvB). There you go. You also haven't "Proven" anything. Dr. Cox Says Hi (Possibly again, can't remember, brain overloaded by stupidity of OP's suggestion) |

RAND0M MORPH
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 02:03:00 -
[79] - Quote
Please dont post stuff that is already been answered. Read the thread before you post.
Again:
- I dont want lowsec neither 0.0, I wanna stay in highsec for awhile. - I dont want to belong to any corp/alliance/team - I want to experience PvP in highsec (hunting, survival) and live in constant dangerous in highsec for awhile or permanently. - Ride on my own or with a couple friends, and look for valid targets in systems. - Be missioning or ratting or mining or doing w/e and having to check local etc.. (0.0 feeling, and also good for new pilots)
I cant do this at the moment in eve, and this feature will make it possible.
Once again, you dont want it? Dont use it.
Or tell me how this will affect someone that doesnt like this feature! I dont even know why are you even arguing, because you have shown no valid arguments.
I said: I dont want lowsec (this feature is for highsec purposes, its written in the first post) Your argument (which doesnt affect you in anyway): Go lowsec for pvp
Go see a psychiatrist asap, thats my advice.
Besides, going to lowsec to pvp is TOTALLY different from what Im talking about (in game experience related). |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
138
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 02:10:00 -
[80] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:Please dont post stuff that is already been answered. Read the thread before you post.
The post right above you, in fact. |

RAND0M MORPH
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 02:20:00 -
[81] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:RAND0M MORPH wrote:Please dont post stuff that is already been answered. Read the thread before you post.
The post right above you, in fact.
Because you can keep your security status in lowsec when you pvp.
You're a noob dude, just go afk in Jita or post valid and coherent reasons.
Once again for the trillionth time:
Dont want it? Dont use it. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
138
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 02:23:00 -
[82] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:RubyPorto wrote:RAND0M MORPH wrote:Please dont post stuff that is already been answered. Read the thread before you post.
The post right above you, in fact. Because you can keep your security status in lowsec when you pvp. You're a noob dude, just go afk in Jita or post valid and coherent reasons. Once again for the trillionth time: Dont want it? Dont use it.
Hunt Pirates or get aggroed first. Form Spider Wardecced Corps for many-sided PvP. |

RAND0M MORPH
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 02:30:00 -
[83] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:RAND0M MORPH wrote:RubyPorto wrote:RAND0M MORPH wrote:Please dont post stuff that is already been answered. Read the thread before you post.
The post right above you, in fact. Because you can keep your security status in lowsec when you pvp. You're a noob dude, just go afk in Jita or post valid and coherent reasons. Once again for the trillionth time: Dont want it? Dont use it. Hunt Pirates or get aggroed first. Form Spider Wardecced Corps for many-sided PvP.
Im not gonna be arguing with you since you cant come up with good arguments and all you're doing is "no you're wrong" basically.
The implementation of this feature wont affect you nor your station spinning. You dont want it? Dont use it.
Theres no reason in denying it, except from a DEV point of view if applicable. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
138
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 02:35:00 -
[84] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:
Im not gonna be arguing with you since you cant come up with good arguments and all you're doing is "no you're wrong and here's the myriad reasons why" basically.
Fixed for you. Everyone but you and your Sock Puppet has come out against your idea. You have essentially copied and pasted your responses repeatedly without meaningfully addressing any of the arguments presented in said dissenting responses. |

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 02:58:00 -
[85] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:Dont want it? Dont use it.
I can understand where you are coming from and yes, you are correct - there has been no DEV replies to this topic regarding the resources required to implement this feature. However, you seem to be under the impression that if something suits your gameplay and will have little effect on others, that this should be implemented immediately. The above-quoted justification for your stance is simply inadequate and will not be taken seriously by other players, let alone the DEV team.
What you have to consider is the broader perspective of your idea and although it seems that it won't affect anybody but those bored hi-sec PvPers who want to have a piece of 0.0 in hi-sec, that will simply not be the case. If your idea had no effect on anything else, I wouldn't be posting here and neither would a range of other people who unfortunately disagree with you.
Putting in a hi-sec PvP feature that is tantamount to what is already there in 0.0 and low sec will affect the distribution of players in EvE and again in my opinion will further distance already deserted low-sec and 0.0 away from hi-sec that has ~80% of the player base sitting in it. This is not the way to go about a game in which such a vast amount of space is reserved to low-sec and 0.0. |

RAND0M MORPH
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 06:12:00 -
[86] - Quote
Katie Frost wrote:RAND0M MORPH wrote:Dont want it? Dont use it. I can understand where you are coming from and yes, you are correct - there has been no DEV replies to this topic regarding the resources required to implement this feature. However, you seem to be under the impression that if something suits your gameplay and will have little effect on others, that this should be implemented immediately. The above-quoted justification for your stance is simply inadequate and will not be taken seriously by other players, let alone the DEV team. What you have to consider is the broader perspective of your idea and although it seems that it won't affect anybody but those bored hi-sec PvPers who want to have a piece of 0.0 in hi-sec, that will simply not be the case. If your idea had no effect on anything else, I wouldn't be posting here and neither would a range of other people who unfortunately disagree with you. Putting in a hi-sec PvP feature that is tantamount to what is already there in 0.0 and low sec will affect the distribution of players in EvE and again in my opinion will further distance already deserted low-sec and 0.0 away from hi-sec that has ~80% of the player base sitting in it. This is not the way to go about a game in which such a vast amount of space is reserved to low-sec and 0.0.
Finally, for the first time someone in this thread came up with a valid reason that justifies his decision on saying no to this feature.
However that is one thing I that should be thought about, the real consequences.
From your point of view players would desert even more lowsec and 0.0, but from my point of view it is deserted cause players in highsec dont wanna "risk" going to 0.0, lowsec YET. Everyone has the same excuse of: "Im still not ready"
That "risk" and "still not ready" is caused by the fear of the unknown, they dont know what pvp looks like, how is it out there. Before incursions a huge quantity of players didnt even know what a fleet with logistics looked like. Now people have much more sense of what a fleet can look like and how things work (movement, broadcasts, overview, etc etc )
In my opinion (and theres barely one time that Im wrong, Im in the 20% most intelligent people in us group, not kidding), this feature would give a much closer feeling to what pvp can look like out there.
Breaking that fear and lighting up that unknown will cause the players to feel comfortable enough to leave highsec and join a 0.0 corp for the real thing.
|

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
141
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 06:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote:Katie Frost wrote:RAND0M MORPH wrote:Dont want it? Dont use it. I can understand where you are coming from and yes, you are correct - there has been no DEV replies to this topic regarding the resources required to implement this feature. However, you seem to be under the impression that if something suits your gameplay and will have little effect on others, that this should be implemented immediately. The above-quoted justification for your stance is simply inadequate and will not be taken seriously by other players, let alone the DEV team. What you have to consider is the broader perspective of your idea and although it seems that it won't affect anybody but those bored hi-sec PvPers who want to have a piece of 0.0 in hi-sec, that will simply not be the case. If your idea had no effect on anything else, I wouldn't be posting here and neither would a range of other people who unfortunately disagree with you. Putting in a hi-sec PvP feature that is tantamount to what is already there in 0.0 and low sec will affect the distribution of players in EvE and again in my opinion will further distance already deserted low-sec and 0.0 away from hi-sec that has ~80% of the player base sitting in it. This is not the way to go about a game in which such a vast amount of space is reserved to low-sec and 0.0. Finally, for the first time someone in this thread came up with a valid reason that justifies his decision on saying no to this feature. However that is one thing I that should be thought about, the real consequences. From your point of view players would desert even more lowsec and 0.0, but from my point of view it is deserted cause players in highsec dont wanna "risk" going to 0.0, lowsec YET. Everyone has the same excuse of: "Im still not ready" That "risk" and "still not ready" is caused by the fear of the unknown, they dont know what pvp looks like, how is it out there. Before incursions a huge quantity of players didnt even know what a fleet with logistics looked like. Now people have much more sense of what a fleet can look like and how things work (movement, broadcasts, overview, etc etc ) In my opinion (and theres barely one time that Im wrong, Im in the 20% most intelligent people in us group, not kidding), this feature would give a much closer feeling to what pvp can look like out there. Breaking that fear and lighting up that unknown will cause the players to feel comfortable enough to leave highsec and join a 0.0 corp for the real thing.
|

Katie Frost
Asgard. Exodus.
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.14 22:05:00 -
[88] - Quote
RAND0M MORPH wrote: From your point of view players would desert even more lowsec and 0.0, but from my point of view it is deserted cause players in highsec dont wanna "risk" going to 0.0, lowsec YET. Everyone has the same excuse of: "Im still not ready"
That "risk" and "still not ready" is caused by the fear of the unknown, they dont know what pvp looks like, how is it out there. Before incursions a huge quantity of players didnt even know what a fleet with logistics looked like. Now people have much more sense of what a fleet can look like and how things work (movement, broadcasts, overview, etc etc )
Breaking that fear and lighting up that unknown will cause the players to feel comfortable enough to leave highsec and join a 0.0 corp for the real thing.
As I said, I can understand your point of view - I just don't think I can agree with it.
If people are "not ready" to break into low-sec or 0.0 - they can commence by joining the already established mechanics for them to access PvP in hi-sec: FW, RvB, wardecs. These three activities alone would bridge them to low-sec and 0.0 PvP much more effectively than your idea, as it would give them a taste of solo, small-fleet and blob PvP.
If we provide new players with too many options to PvP in hi-sec, they will simply become more entrenched. After all, why would you want to leave hi-sec, when everything that is found in low-sec and 0.0 can now be accessed in hi-sec with a much lower penalty. Low sec makes you lose sec-status, there are gate guns, pirates, lack of resources... 0.0 has bubbles that can kill your pod, large alliance fleets and no access to easy ship replacement.
More work needs to be put into low-sec and 0.0 to make these areas more attractive to new/existing players. I am afraid that adding content to hi-sec is not the best way to go about it - if in fact the purpose of your proposal was to bridge this gap. |

iCaldari
QWERTY ASDFG
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.16 09:45:00 -
[89] - Quote
i wish |

Obsidiana
White-Noise
33
|
Posted - 2011.12.16 20:15:00 -
[90] - Quote
Mutual, perma, multi-corp wardecs would be the next best thing. Or the Red vs. Blue thing. |

Spork Witch
Soul-Strike
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.16 20:22:00 -
[91] - Quote
Down-vote.
We have corps, alliances, and wardecs. We have factional warfare for individuals, corps, and I think I read it got / is getting extended to alliances.
There is no point to this system.
Furthermore, if you want to be KOS to anyone, just start shooting people, you'll get there eventually.
Finally, there's also this awesome KOS location where anyone can kill anyone without penalty: it's called nullsec. It exists for a reason. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 01:56:00 -
[92] - Quote
Spork Witch wrote:Down-vote.
We have corps, alliances, and wardecs. We have factional warfare for individuals, corps, and I think I read it got / is getting extended to alliances.
There is no point to this system.
Furthermore, if you want to be KOS to anyone, just start shooting people, you'll get there eventually.
Finally, there's also this awesome KOS location where anyone can kill anyone without penalty: it's called nullsec. It exists for a reason.
This has nothing to do with corps wardecs, this is personal option.
Try to understand. If you never played wow, go play it for a bit and try this kind of system, then let me know.
People often dont have an idea of whats being suggested and comment retardedly, lol its hilarious. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

Tenris Anis
Schattenengel Clan
4
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 03:11:00 -
[93] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:I like it. Your attackable to anyone who has this option. Get to know people who do it, form up fleets from chat channels and such. Turn it on some days off the next and just go out a hunt with friends from time to time.
It would be fun.
You mean like faction warfare?
RAND0M MORPH wrote: From your point of view players would desert even more lowsec and 0.0, but from my point of view it is deserted cause players in highsec dont wanna "risk" going to 0.0, lowsec YET. Everyone has the same excuse of: "Im still not ready"
That "risk" and "still not ready" is caused by the fear of the unknown, they dont know what pvp looks like, how is it out there. Before incursions a huge quantity of players didnt even know what a fleet with logistics looked like. Now people have much more sense of what a fleet can look like and how things work (movement, broadcasts, overview, etc etc )
In my opinion (and theres barely one time that Im wrong, Im in the 20% most intelligent people in us group, not kidding), this feature would give a much closer feeling to what pvp can look like out there.
Breaking that fear and lighting up that unknown will cause the players to feel comfortable enough to leave highsec and join a 0.0 corp for the real thing.
If you want that risk free pvp, join red vs blue and learn some basics. Actually it can be even fun if you just join for the lolz. |

Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 03:54:00 -
[94] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:I like it. Your attackable to anyone who has this option. Get to know people who do it, form up fleets from chat channels and such. Turn it on some days off the next and just go out a hunt with friends from time to time.
It would be fun.
It is fun...
...It is also called RvB which, contrary to popular belief, is not just n00bs in frigs 
|

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 09:00:00 -
[95] - Quote
Tenris Anis wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:I like it. Your attackable to anyone who has this option. Get to know people who do it, form up fleets from chat channels and such. Turn it on some days off the next and just go out a hunt with friends from time to time.
It would be fun.
You mean like faction warfare? RAND0M MORPH wrote: From your point of view players would desert even more lowsec and 0.0, but from my point of view it is deserted cause players in highsec dont wanna "risk" going to 0.0, lowsec YET. Everyone has the same excuse of: "Im still not ready"
That "risk" and "still not ready" is caused by the fear of the unknown, they dont know what pvp looks like, how is it out there. Before incursions a huge quantity of players didnt even know what a fleet with logistics looked like. Now people have much more sense of what a fleet can look like and how things work (movement, broadcasts, overview, etc etc )
In my opinion (and theres barely one time that Im wrong, Im in the 20% most intelligent people in us group, not kidding), this feature would give a much closer feeling to what pvp can look like out there.
Breaking that fear and lighting up that unknown will cause the players to feel comfortable enough to leave highsec and join a 0.0 corp for the real thing.
If you want that risk free pvp, join red vs blue and learn some basics. Actually it can be even fun if you just join for the lolz.
Both of you are retardeds.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WARS BETWEEN 2 CORPS WHATSOEVER.
Got that part?
Now THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FACTION WARS.
Got that part too?
Id like to see you in amarr faction and coming to jita and stay outside the station chilling.
If you have no clue about what this is, or how it feels to do it, then dont post. Just go spin your ship to the station as you always do. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
218
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 10:05:00 -
[96] - Quote
THXBYE wrote: Id like to see you in amarr faction and coming to jita and stay outside the station chilling.
If you have no clue about what this is, or how it feels to do it, then dont post. Just go spin your ship to the station as you always do.
And you know all about Faction Warfare mechanics. (ProTip: Amarr Empire and Caldari State are allies. You can go into that high security space with no fear of police intervention).
RvB are corps in name only. They (and FW) are the closest thing Eve will ever have to battlefields in WoW. And you have yet to come up with a convincing reason why we need WoW battlefields in Eve. If you want WoW battlefields, WoW is >>>>>> thataway.
Now your goal of helping people get over "notreadyitis" is a good one, you just have failed to convince anyone that your idea would accomplish that goal.
That you are continually abrasive, rude, and arrogant doesn't help your cause at all either.
You're trying to change things, You have the burden to prove it's a good idea. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
2172
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 10:13:00 -
[97] - Quote
Already covered by a multitude of existing mechanics. The people who are currently choosing not to make use of those options will just choose not to make use of this option as well.
Adds nothing GÇö not needed. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 12:26:00 -
[98] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Already covered by a multitude of existing mechanics. The people who are currently choosing not to make use of those options will just choose not to make use of this option as well.
Adds nothing GÇö not needed.
Where is that multitude that I cant see ?? Jet can?? Is that what you call pvp?? LOL .. gtfo
RvB? Already answered many times just look at post above. Faction? Already answered as well, you cant fly anywhere you want with faction and then again its GROUPS of people against its others, I dont wanna be part of any group.
This is a style of living and an option, its NOT a change, where the **** do you see any change by ADDING this? Dumbass
Then again, people that play/played wow knows what this is. And how it feels being a "Villain" and attack anyone anywhere, or being attacked no matter what level you are, (in eve no matter how many sp or ship you got).
Its a VERY exciting way of playing the game. Especially when youre done with the tuturial and reach 40mil sp.
EDIT: Forgot to paste the answer to ruby before copy/pasted this second one and now its gone, but basically it said all that it was said already about RvB:
RvB? I dont want to join any corp thank you. And I dont wanna know who is my enemy until I see him in local. RvB was created ESPECIALLY because of the lack of pvp situations, why not just fix it with a decent game mechanic instead?
2 corps against each other, each corp has 20 members (imagine), with this option your enemies will be TWICE the ones you have in rvb, because everyone is a valid target.
Standings will have a place in highsec. You will still have your corp and a **** ton of enemies or friends.
This universal PvP system is the ONLY way you can call real PvP in highsec, otherwise go to 0.0, Which this would help people to have a notion of. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
2172
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:21:00 -
[99] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Where is that multitude that I cant see ?? Already listed. Just because you don't want to use them doesn't mean they don't exist, and their existence (and people's unwillingness to use them) shows that your idea is not needed, nor will it do what you want it to do.
Quote:This is a style of living and an option, its NOT a change, where the **** do you see any change by ADDING this? Dumbass Where the hell did you see any mention of a change, ********? Learn to read you bloody idiot. You said it yourself: adding this changes nothing, therefore it is a moronic idea that does absolutely nothing. STFU and stop trolling you spaz.
See how that works? Keep the insults and straw men up, and your inability to discuss and defend your idea just shows even more. The fact remains: what you're asking for already exists.
Quote:This universal PvP system is the ONLY way you can call real PvP in highsec, otherwise go to 0.0 Again, what you're asking for already exists and is already not used. No-one would use your option.
You've failed to explain how your suggestion will add anything of any value to anyone who's interested; you've failed to explained why your suggestion is needed; you've failed to explain what it fixes; you've failed to explain why existing solutions are insufficient; you've failed to explain what need it satisfies.
In essence: you're addressing a complete non-issue. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:36:00 -
[100] - Quote
Tippia wrote:THXBYE wrote:Where is that multitude that I cant see ?? Already listed. Just because you don't want to use them doesn't mean they don't exist, and their existence (and people's unwillingness to use them) shows that your idea is not needed, nor will it do what you want it to do..
Im not gonna argue with idiots that cant understand or answer along the same lines.
All the pvp mechanics already mentioned in this thread, I answered to them all explaining how it was totally different from this, you seem to not want to read them and simply just throw "No you're wrong" comments.
RvB - I dont wanna join any corp, also no teams or groups to belong to. Faction Warfare - I wanna be free and a "villain" everyone against everyone, no teams. Also wanna ride free and go anywhere at anytime. Can jet - If you think this is pvp gtfo and go play pokemon.
What this changes? Nothing, it wont affect those that do not want to participate. What this adds? A LOT. In between: - An extremely exciting play experience. - A huge amount of real pvp opportunities - A meaning to standings in highsec Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:40:00 -
[101] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:I like it. Your attackable to anyone who has this option. Get to know people who do it, form up fleets from chat channels and such. Turn it on some days off the next and just go out a hunt with friends from time to time.
It would be fun.
It is fun... ...It is also called RvB which, contrary to popular belief, is not just n00bs in frigs 
Grey Azorria wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:I like it. Your attackable to anyone who has this option. Get to know people who do it, form up fleets from chat channels and such. Turn it on some days off the next and just go out a hunt with friends from time to time.
It would be fun.
It is fun... ...It is also called RvB which, contrary to popular belief, is not just n00bs in frigs 
Oh so funny, two teams fighting against each other, thats real ******* funny and not outdone yet.
Again:
RvB - I dont wanna join any corp, also no teams or groups to belong to. Faction Warfare - I wanna be free and a "villain" everyone against everyone, no teams. Also wanna ride free and go anywhere at anytime. Can jet - If you think this is pvp gtfo and go play pokemon.
What this changes? Nothing, it wont affect those that do not want to participate. What this adds? A LOT. In between: - An extremely exciting play experience. - A huge amount of real pvp opportunities - A meaning to standings in highsec Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
2172
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:46:00 -
[102] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Im not gonna argue with idiots that cant understand or answer along the same lines. GǪalong the same lines as what? Your abuse-laden and nonsenical lack of argumentation? Good thing you're the only one using that around here, then. If you can't argue your point without falling back on personal attacks, your point is worthless. Try showing that it is actually worth something, if you canGǪ
Quote:All the pvp mechanics already mentioned in this thread, I answered to them all explaining how it was totally different from this, GǪand the problem remains: what you're suggesting will not do what you want to do because as those other mechanisms show, people aren't interested. There are plenty of ways to get into fights and be a target GÇö if you (and others) don't want to use them, then that's pretty indicative of how little interest there is in your idea.
You need to address this fact.
Quote:What this changes? Nothing, it wont affect those that do not want to participate. GǪand by that, you are showing that your idea has no legs. It is, by your own account, completely pointless. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:50:00 -
[103] - Quote
Tippia wrote:THXBYE wrote:Im not gonna argue with idiots that cant understand or answer along the same lines. GǪalong the same lines as what? Your abuse-laden and nonsenical lack of argumentation? Good thing you're the only one using that around here, then. If you can't argue your point without falling back on personal attacks, your point is worthless. Try showing that it is actually worth something, if you canGǪ Quote:All the pvp mechanics already mentioned in this thread, I answered to them all explaining how it was totally different from this, GǪand the problem remains: what you're suggesting will not do what you want to do because as those other mechanisms show, people aren't interested. There are plenty of ways to get into fights and be a target GÇö if you (and others) don't want to use them, then that's pretty indicative of how little interest there is in your idea. You need to address this fact. Quote:What this changes? Nothing, it wont affect those that do not want to participate. GǪand by that, you are showing that your idea has no legs. It is, by your own account, completely pointless.
Again:
RvB - I dont wanna join any corp, also no teams or groups to belong to. Faction Warfare - I wanna be free and a "villain" everyone against everyone, no teams. Also wanna ride free and go anywhere at anytime. Can jet - If you think this is pvp gtfo and go play pokemon.
What this changes? Nothing, it wont affect those that do not want to participate. What this adds? A LOT. In between: - An extremely exciting play experience. - A huge amount of real pvp opportunities - A meaning to standings in highsec
If you have anything to add to this, let me know. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
2172
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:52:00 -
[104] - Quote
GǪyou failed to address any of the points and failed to provide any kind of argument.
Could you try to do that instead of repeating your irrelevant gibberish? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:54:00 -
[105] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪyou failed to address any of the points and failed to provide any kind of argument. Could you try to do that instead of repeating your irrelevant gibberish?
Yes I failed.
Here for non fail:
RvB - I dont wanna join any corp, also no teams or groups to belong to. Faction Warfare - I wanna be free and a "villain" everyone against everyone, no teams. Also wanna ride free and go anywhere at anytime. Can jet - If you think this is pvp gtfo and go play pokemon.
What this changes? Nothing, it wont affect those that do not want to participate. What this adds? A LOT. In between: - An extremely exciting play experience. - A huge amount of real pvp opportunities - A meaning to standings in highsec
Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
2172
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 13:56:00 -
[106] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Yes I failed.
Here for non fail: GǪyou still failed to address any of the points and failed to provide any kind of argument.
Could you try to do that instead of repeating your irrelevant gibberish? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
40
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 14:19:00 -
[107] - Quote
So to clean things out and make it easier to picture, heres a resume:
Mechanics answered in this thread:
RvB - I dont want to belong to any corp/alliance/team - I dont wanna join any corp, also no teams or groups to belong to (RvB was created specifically to have something close to this. PvP in highsec)
Faction Warefare - I dont want to belong to any team - I wanna be free and a "villain" everyone against everyone - I wanna ride free and go anywhere at anytime
Lowsec - I dont wanna leave highsec - I dont wanna deal with security status
Can Jet - Jita IV - IV
PROS
- One more thing you can do in EvE. - Dynamic Highsec real PvP, with hunting and survival and also the surprise element. - Easy access to what real PvP is to people living in highsec that do not want to belong to any corp or alliance or leave highsec for now. - A form of living, be a villain. - An extremely exciting play experience. - A huge amount of real pvp opportunities. - A meaning to standings in highsec. - Kills the boredom to many people in game bringing a new breath taking activity for a moment or a form of playing the game at all times. - Connects a little bit more 0.0 experience and highsec, giving players an enthusiastic experience. - One more way to create fights and ships and modules and ammo consumption bringing healthy activity to the economy.
CONS
- N/A (No one in this thread yet mentioned a single one)
Example:
- You are bored, you turn on this option and grab your rifter and go, you travel a couple jumps and you see a red in local, use your scan, etc etc etc.. - Be missioning or ratting or mining or doing w/e and having to check local etc.. (0.0 feeling, and also good for new pilots) - Ride on my own or with a couple friends, and look for valid targets in systems. - Or you can just live with it ON and be a villain permently
Once this is implemented:
- You wanna try it? Use it. - You dont like it and are against? Dont use it.
Its just an addition to eve, is not a change, this is not supposed to fix anything.
All the pvp mechanics already mentioned in this thread, I answered to them all explaining how they were all different from this. If you have a real CONS as to why this shouldnt be implemented, feel free to post. Im really interesting (even I am trying to think of one) to know if theres any possible cons.
Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
241
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 23:55:00 -
[108] - Quote
THXBYE wrote: Faction Warfare - I wanna be free and a "villain" everyone against everyone, no teams. Also wanna ride free and go anywhere at anytime.
So you want to be a Pirate without the Sec Status hit? You want to be able to fight people without CONCORD intervention. LowSec is Highsec with no CONCORD intervention in fights. Now you want to do that against people who didn't attack you without a Sec Status hit, aka the downside to ganking someone.
The people who actually want the type of life you describe live in Lowsec as Pirates or RvB (ignore their fleets and shoot random hostiles).
One of the PITA parts of getting fights on roams is finding targets. Why do you want that compounded by hundreds of non-targets to sift through.
Your idea will never give you juicy kills because nobody in their right mind flies anything juicy into unneeded danger without some benefit (i.e. Rewards better than l4s).
You have failed to clearly state what your goals with this idea are.
You have failed to show how those goals will improve EVE Online.
You have failed to demonstrate how your idea will achieve those goals.
You have done all of this failing in the most abrasive and annoying manner possible.
Your portrait has either chipmunk cheeks or Jaw Cancer, not sure which
So in summary, you have failed. A Lot.
. |

Sephiroth CloneIIV
Vitriol Ventures BLACK-MARK
35
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 02:39:00 -
[109] - Quote
interesting idea
though redundant and not totally necessary with game mechanics that allow fighting already.
If you want to always get fights, join a corp that always wardecs or get wardecked, make war mutual. No concord intervention.
Or... go into low sec or npc null sec space, no need for organizing war decks just shot anyone you please.
the only thing this new idea adds is being able to select constant pvp in a major trade hub so can more easily find cheep ships and refit, and nearly with anyone who wants fight them regardless of corp/alliance.
|

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
238
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 03:42:00 -
[110] - Quote
All I'm getting from the OP is this:
"Mommy, I want to ride my bicycle around... but I don't want to go out into the street because I like the backyard better. Can we get a bicycle track built in the backyard so I don't have to go into the street?"
What you are asking for already exists in some form. Your idea is redundant and only serves to bring more "features" to high-sec... which in turn does not encourage people to spread out to low-sec and null-sec.
-1 "Just because I seem like an idiot, doesn't mean I am one." ~Unknown |

THXBYE
Elite War Squad
43
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 06:21:00 -
[111] - Quote
Bump FTW
Please let me know what you guys think. Universal PvP System Mode: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=38634 In Game Laws, Fines and Taxes: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=36124 Stations and NPC Services Costs: ..default.aspx?g=posts&t=39038 |

Nestara Aldent
EVE University Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 08:54:00 -
[112] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:Bump FTW
Please let me know what you guys think.
I think you're trolling.
There exists RvB already, as other people in the tread have pointed out already, which serve exactly the same purpose as well as faction warfare. Implemeting on top of that another faction mechanic is anti-immersive and game breaking.
Hell, "Villains of the East"? What does that mean, exactly, and how it can be connected to the game fiction? And it serves no purpose because we have RvB and FW already.
If you wanna feel like a villain against everybody else, pvp solo in closest low/null. You'll be served instantly. |

GavinCapacitor
CaeIum Incognitum
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 15:57:00 -
[113] - Quote
THXBYE wrote:T' Elk wrote:Best trollthread ever. 11/10 Not at all bro. Being serious, this is a great idea and I still havent seen one single reasonable answer to it in this thread other than a bunch forum losers station afkers flawed stupidity.
Calling people bro is too obvious, I'm going to have to dock some points. 5/10 |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |