|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Distaa
Dain Bramage Inc.
0
   |
Posted - 2014.11.28 20:11:33 -
[1] - Quote
Cervix Thumper wrote:Nolak Ataru wrote:Deck Cadelanne wrote:Recyclers wrote:
Well I just unsubed all 9 of my accounts. Not just because of the multiboxing thing.
CPP ramming way to many changes at once.
I play games if there fun. When there not.... oh well
If even one more subscription *paying* player replaces you, that is a net win. And you have just reduced the demand for PLEX ever so slightly, so even good for your fellow non-sub-paying brethren. Are you another one of those people who think using PLEX to sub somehow takes away from CCP's revenue? Because that's wrong. CCP / a CSM explained that PLEX is under the "deferred income" tab, not "expenses". don't be dense... if they unsubscribed they stopped paying the re-subscription cost. That is real life money.
How was plex paid for? Monopoly money?
6 month @ 12.95 per month = 77.7 USD
6 plex @ 16.96 = 101.7 USD
Plex nets CCP an extra 24.96 per six months per player.
I have 5 accounts, so 24.96 x 5 = 124.45 USD per 6 months.
The changes to multi-boxing probably won't effect the majority of the IsBoxer community. But it will effect the people within the community that have taken it to an extreme.
o7 |
Distaa
Dain Bramage Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 21:22:17 -
[2] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:Can CCP please clarify to their GMs that this new policy isn't going to be in effect until Jan 1st? There are reports of multiboxers already being banned for broadcasting, and re-petitions being closed... 
I feel sure that some kind of internal memo has made the rounds at CCP, if banning really is taking place I would attribute it to other reasons.
o7 |
Distaa
Dain Bramage Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 19:48:38 -
[3] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Verde Minator wrote:hold on, are you telling me i dont know what i saw? you are. hilarious. truly, hilarious.
yeah, he showed me all that. he isn't just gonna go, oh look at this der der der.. nah man. apparently you are just saying whatever and telling me to go educate myself when i have.
anywho. so i dont know what im talking about.
let's just agree to disagree No, I'm saying what you saw was the result, not the effort being put in to set it up. Once it is set up, you can just log on and go, that what he showed you. You don't even know how ISBoxer works, you've just jumped in crying at people because you think that this change is will punish people for being smarter than you are. The thing is, they are smarter than you, so they'll adapt. Any competent multiboxer will not be put off by this change. Sure it'll be extra effort, but will still be worthwhile.
Even the less competent Boxers like myself will adapt and thrive.
07 |
Distaa
Dain Bramage Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2014.11.29 21:54:06 -
[4] - Quote
Eryn Velasquez wrote:Nolak Ataru wrote:
Nonsense. People are currently crying at CCP because they lost a 20b Providence to an ISBoxer ganker and are trying desperately to make the argument that they would not have been ganked if ISBoxing wasn't a thing.
I've seen more people complain about the local CODE monkey who constantly bumps people in belts and tries to sell "mining permits" in their relatively short lifespan than I ever have of people complaining about ISBoxer in my three years of playing.
But CCP *is* gutting it's revenue stream. There are some multiboxers such as myself that didn't PLEX their accounts ever because we wanted to support the game. To take away a significant chunk of the demand of a product and then claiming "We will still sell the same amount / make the same profit" is ludicrous to say the least.
I never had any contact with code. or any hisec pseudo-pvp ganker. I'm playing 6 accounts without any cheating 3rd party software since 2008. Works absolutely fine. It is completely irrelevant how much work you have put into the cheatingBox. You'd better had invested your time in learning how to play without crutch.
You say it's cheating but CCP says it isn't. Which one should I listen to? I gonna go with CCP on this one. I mean really they own the game and they are fine with ISBOXER being used in conjunction with THEIR game. Getta clue dude or buy one with a plex.
o7 |
|
|
| |
|