|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
15911
   |
Posted - 2014.11.25 17:51:35 -
[1] - Quote
Artemis Dalvik wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:So, does this mean no more Mac support? wtf does this have to do with mac support?
I use MAC and have no idea what this could possibly do to my gameplay
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
15963
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:33:34 -
[2] - Quote
Querns wrote:This will probably never happen. This game is pretty much impossible to play on any meaningful level without multiboxing.
I guess that depends on what you mean by "meaningful level". Devoid of any useful definition of that phrase, this statement is utter crap.
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
15977
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:35:13 -
[3] - Quote
Mr Omniblivion wrote:This is ironic but the logical change next to be made is to nerf afk cloaking.
Sure, that's logical, since an AFK cloaked pilot has absolutely no way to interact with the game at all... perfect sense there... 
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
16068
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 23:33:48 -
[4] - Quote
Xython wrote:Aerious wrote:Goon tears are the best tears! You may be misunderstanding a different liquid for tears. This is the best news all month.
Yeah, not all goons are crying about this...
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
16068
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 23:37:06 -
[5] - Quote
Mr Omniblivion wrote:RoAnnon wrote:Mr Omniblivion wrote:This is ironic but the logical change next to be made is to nerf afk cloaking. Sure, that's logical, since an AFK cloaked pilot has absolutely no way to interact with the game at all... perfect sense there... CCP is directly nerfing the force projection that one player can have affect on others in Eve. What do you think afk cloaking is? 
It's psychological warfare at best, playing on nullbear fears. I have AFK cloaked my share of systems, but that doesn't change the fact an AFK or Cloaked pilot can not interact with anything in game. A pilot who is both doubly so. When was the last time you were attacked by either an AFK pilot or a cloaked ship?
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
16074
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 00:37:47 -
[6] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:I'm a Mac user, and to be perfectly honest it would never have occurred to me to control EVE clients through AppleScript--though, granted, that's because I usually control one, and at most two, accounts at once on a single monitor, and those two accounts are usually doing distinctly different things.
That's my case. I've used Applescript in other apps, but never even thought about trying to multibox EVE with it. Most accounts I've ever run at once was 3. I have two displays, and I had one miner, one hauler and a scout going. Only did that once though. And haven't run 2 for a long time.
Frankly, if someone thinks they MUST multibox to play EVE, they're doing it wrong.
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
16088
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 02:53:56 -
[7] - Quote
Mr Omniblivion wrote:"AFK Cloaking" is basically the same thing-
Yeah, it really isn't the same at all. A fleet of 20 bombers, or 4 maledictions flying in unison to a single control vs one player with an equal number of characters in different systems... You're not even comparing apples to apples, more like apples to tunafish.
Your original comment that AFK cloaking is the next "logical" target doesn't follow based on force projection.
Based on things people do because CCP has said it's allowed, that might get reversed later... now I can see how it might follow.
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
16090
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 03:02:02 -
[8] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Mr Omniblivion wrote:
To reiterate what I've said a few times- we are in favor of this broadcast change- it sucks for a few of us, but it's an overall good change for the game.
The reason for the change isn't "they're using 3rd party software or not". It's being able to unreasonably project the power that one player has in Eve.
It doesn't matter if someone is sitting in a system cloaked all day, personally. Jump fatigue and range nerfs really limited the effect of AFK cloaking. If CCP is going with the route of putting more power into the individual player rather than how many accounts that player controls (which is what this nerf is), then AFK cloaking would be a logical next step.
Edit: I explained the similarity on the previous page, check there, not retyping that **** again.
also that's the last time I troll about afk cloaking and get caught up in an actual argument about it
AFK cloaking is a perfectly fine and normal mechanic. Either ignore the guy and hope that he is AFK, or take defensive measures. Problem solved.
I think Mr. O may have missed all the AFK cloaker discussions in F&I, and doesn't realize how much it's been hashed over.. 
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
RoAnnon
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
16090
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 03:03:51 -
[9] - Quote
Mr Omniblivion wrote:No.
Look at the trillions of isk worth of damage that one man (Replicator) with tens of accounts did to goons, according to Gevlon Goblin-statistician extraordinaire
Replicator was neither AFK, nor cloaked, at the time he attacked anyone. Your argument is disingenuous at best.
So, you're a bounty hunter.
No, that ain't it at all.
Then what are you?
I'm a bounty hunter.
|
|
|
| |
|