| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Jongo Fett
Save Yourself Inc.
0
   |
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:32:00 -
[61] - Quote
resubbed...just for the new nebulas booya! (and also Tier 3 BC;s) |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
167
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:33:00 -
[62] - Quote
Archetype 66 wrote:SURPRISE 2 :
"When a jump portal is active on a ship it cannot receive remote assistance. This is now clearly shown on attributes."
portal as in cyno, or bridge?
Does this mean a cyno can't have reps put on it, or is this for a BO/titan bridging people through?
|
Archetype 66
Pleasure and Pain
Ares Protectiva
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:35:00 -
[63] - Quote
Archetype 66 wrote:SURPRISE 2 :
"When a jump portal is active on a ship it cannot receive remote assistance. This is now clearly shown on attributes."
CCP, what is that ? A titan or Black Op bridging will no longer be able to receive assistance ? Did it even happen just one time ?
What is the point ? I missed it...no one is remoting a bridging ship in the short duration of the bridge....I mean, preventing assistance on a ship whose have a Cynosural active would have an interest but eh what's that ?
Anyway Crucible is providing a tons of good things :) GG for the hard work. Keep in that way !!! |
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
127
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:39:00 -
[64] - Quote
I think the item I will use most from this expansion is the Tractor Beam II.
Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |
Holznar'ar Eoner
Blackheart Capsuleers
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:40:00 -
[65] - Quote
CCP Paradox wrote:Reteris wrote:Crucible Question:
As far as the new Capt Qtr. go, is the factional qtrs. based on my character or is it based on the faction that owns the station?
For example, I'm Caldari. If I dock to an Amarr station, would I get an Amarr CQ because of the station or would I still receive my Caldari-based CQ?
Thanks, Based on the faction that owns the station Reteris. So if you are of the Amarr race, docking into a Caldari Navy station; you will be in Caldari CQ. Also, the CQ in empire space are cleaner than those in nullsec 
Will we ever be able see and watch the station cleaner bugs/bots in our station flow through a room? |
VR Highfive
Raptor Industries
Art of War Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:41:00 -
[66] - Quote
My God, what an incredibly long list.. |
S8nt
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:42:00 -
[67] - Quote
So the only thing miners get is a new warfare link?
What about fixing the mineral prices and Grav sites?
Really CCP?!?! |
Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
273
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:43:00 -
[68] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Omar Devone Little wrote:Quote:The following ships now receive a +10 m/s velocity increase: Enyo, Utu, Brutix, Dominix, Dominix Navy Issue, Megathron, Megathron Federate Issue, Megathron Navy Issue, Lachesis, Astarte, Eos, Helios, Guardian-Vexor, Thorax, Vexor, Vexor Navy Issue, Vigilant, Catalyst, Elite Megathron Duvolle, Arazu, Falcon, Incursus, Maulus, Tristan, Deimos, and Ishtar.
The following ships now receive a 5% bonus to inertia: Enyo, Utu, Brutix, Dominix, Dominix Navy Issue, Megathron, Megathron Federate Issue, Megathron Navy Issue, Lachesis, Astarte, Eos, Helios, Guardian-Vexor, Thorax, Vexor, Vexor Navy Issue, Vigilant, Catalyst, Elite Megathron Duvolle, Arazu, Falcon, Incursus, Maulus, Tristan, Deimos, Ishtar, Hyperion, Vindicator, Sin, Cormorant, Federation Navy Comet, Kronos, Harpy, Ishkur, Ferox, Rokh, Vulture, Celestis, Exequror Navy Issue, Moa, Atron, Daredevil, Merlin, Adrestia, Eagle, Phobos, Ares, Raptor, Taranis and Eris. Wait, what? I second this "what?" ...What!?
I third THIS !!
What that frack? - I want it NAO !!
|
Jarnis McPieksu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:43:00 -
[69] - Quote
Tess La'Coil wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:XmonkTad wrote:I'm surprised no one has picked up on this yet:
Insurance is no longer paid out for players who are killed by CONCORD.
I feel like this has been a long time coming. This is good news! Everyone picked up on this. It has been a long time known. Yet I've seen a lack of tears... hmm..
For suicide gankers who aim to grief, the insurance payout has always been irrelevant. Those who expect this will make their Mackinaws invulnerable to Goon antics will be the ones shedding tears...
The only difference is that "economically viable" suicide piracy for profit in highsec now requires you to write off the BS fleet completely when doing target selection. It won't eliminate it completely, but it does raise the bar by a couple of billion ISK.
In other words, you will be able to stack some additional ridiculously priced officer mods to your carebearmobile before it attracts a suicide gank for the module drop and (more importantly) you can now haul more valuable freighter cargoes before worrying about getting popped by a swarm of high alpha Tempests on some 0.5 gate... 
In short; nothing much changes...
|
Archetype 66
Pleasure and Pain
Ares Protectiva
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:43:00 -
[70] - Quote
Archetype 66 wrote:SURPRISE....  "Launching a warp disrupt probe should will give you aggression and prevent you from docking or jumping."
Also : Should or Will  I know, my english is terribad but... |
|
|
Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
273
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:47:00 -
[71] - Quote
S8nt wrote:So the only thing miners get is a new warfare link?
What about fixing the mineral prices and Grav sites?
Really CCP?!?!
They got some neurons for free too: if they're tired of being ganked for lols on paper thin ships, they can now stop mining and play with market instead, no more losses and much bigger profits.
Not sure all of them will know how to make those work thou...
|
Kusanagi Kasuga
Ferocious Felines
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:47:00 -
[72] - Quote
Omar Devone Little wrote:Quote:The following ships now receive a +10 m/s velocity increase: Enyo, Utu, Brutix, Dominix, Dominix Navy Issue, Megathron, Megathron Federate Issue, Megathron Navy Issue, Lachesis, Astarte, Eos, Helios, Guardian-Vexor, Thorax, Vexor, Vexor Navy Issue, Vigilant, Catalyst, Elite Megathron Duvolle, Arazu, Falcon, Incursus, Maulus, Tristan, Deimos, and Ishtar.
The following ships now receive a 5% bonus to inertia: Enyo, Utu, Brutix, Dominix, Dominix Navy Issue, Megathron, Megathron Federate Issue, Megathron Navy Issue, Lachesis, Astarte, Eos, Helios, Guardian-Vexor, Thorax, Vexor, Vexor Navy Issue, Vigilant, Catalyst, Elite Megathron Duvolle, Arazu, Falcon, Incursus, Maulus, Tristan, Deimos, Ishtar, Hyperion, Vindicator, Sin, Cormorant, Federation Navy Comet, Kronos, Harpy, Ishkur, Ferox, Rokh, Vulture, Celestis, Exequror Navy Issue, Moa, Atron, Daredevil, Merlin, Adrestia, Eagle, Phobos, Ares, Raptor, Taranis and Eris. Wait, what?
I bet it's the new ship skins (they're going to be new ships, mechanics-wise) |
Tore Vest
Vikinghall
81
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:50:00 -
[73] - Quote
Modules
The following Tech II modules have been added and will only be available through Invention. No Tech II BPOGÇÖs will be created for these items:
So.... we have those new T2 modules on market before x-mas ?
Dont know a **** about invention...  |
Warzon3
Perkone
Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:52:00 -
[74] - Quote
scroll scroll scroll....... where is the end of this list |
mkint
396
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:57:00 -
[75] - Quote
Jarnis McPieksu wrote:Tess La'Coil wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:XmonkTad wrote:I'm surprised no one has picked up on this yet:
Insurance is no longer paid out for players who are killed by CONCORD.
I feel like this has been a long time coming. This is good news! Everyone picked up on this. It has been a long time known. Yet I've seen a lack of tears... hmm.. For suicide gankers who aim to grief, the insurance payout has always been irrelevant. Those who expect this will make their Mackinaws invulnerable to Goon antics will be the ones shedding tears... The only difference is that "economically viable" suicide piracy for profit in highsec now requires you to write off the BS fleet completely when doing target selection. It won't eliminate it completely, but it does raise the bar by a couple of billion ISK. In other words, you will be able to stack some additional ridiculously priced officer mods to your carebearmobile before it attracts a suicide gank for the module drop and (more importantly) you can now haul more valuable freighter cargoes before worrying about getting popped by a swarm of high alpha Tempests on some 0.5 gate... In short; nothing much changes...
Except cost to gank is being reduced by over half. Overall I call this patch a buff to gankers. |
Cal Gin
The Necromonger
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:58:00 -
[76] - Quote
Did i miss something?.... when did the Naga loose its Torps? |
Alx Warlord
SUPERNOVA SOCIETY
Tribal Conclave
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:00:00 -
[77] - Quote
THIS UPDATE WILL BE AWESOME!!!! THIS IS WHAT EVERYONE WAS WAITING FOR!!!!
If CCP keeps this rhythm, the DUST514 patch will be EPIC!!!!! I'm anxious to see how it will change EVE! |
Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
491
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:00:00 -
[78] - Quote
Cal Gin wrote:Did i miss something?.... when did the Naga loose its Torps?
About 2 weeks ago. |
Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir.
Unforgiving.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:03:00 -
[79] - Quote
Question:
Quote: Window settings on Tranquility have been reset as part of the changes to UI and UI scaling. We are sorry for the inconvenience that this will cause to saved windows.
Does this mean that our additional chat windows are going to be removed as well? |
Cal Gin
The Necromonger
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:04:00 -
[80] - Quote
wow.... well that sucks.... i understand about the whole giving all the races 2 bonus for their weapons that everyone was banging on about... but i was hoping they'd move towards torps rather than hybrids... kinda sucks that their will be no missile boat among the new BC's.... oh well... |
|
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P
C C P Alliance
187
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:13:00 -
[81] - Quote
Jarnis McPieksu wrote:Can you elaborate on this? Quote:
Time Dilation
-snip-
* Due to the dangerous nature of altering the fabric of spacetime in such ways, the feature will be turned on at a slightly later date. This is to provide isolation from other fundamental alterations to the machinations of the universe in order to reduce the chances of total protonic reversal.
More specifically, could you give a ballpark figure for this later date? Later this week? Sometime in December? "Soon(tm)"? Also what's the hold-up? (plus, I would imagine total protonic reversal of EVE universe would be a pretty boom and we play EVE for pretty booms, so...)
It comes down to how long the general fallout from the release takes to deal with. TiDi is a potentially great complicating factor, so I want to turn it on when things are reasonably calm. Prior experience would point to that being a week or so after initial release, we'll see how this one goes.
CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
Archetype 66
Pleasure and Pain
Ares Protectiva
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:18:00 -
[82] - Quote
CCP Veritas, CCP Veritas, CCP Veritas ?!? (Did I respect the process ?)
Might you explain us what is that ?
"When a jump portal is active on a ship it cannot receive remote assistance. This is now clearly shown on attributes" |
Ryna Ithra
Ithra Holdings
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:20:00 -
[83] - Quote
# Warfare link II
# Mining Foreman link II
# Core probe launcher II
# Drone link augmentor II
# Omnidirectional tracking link II
# Drone tracking computer II
# Siege module II
# Triage module II
# Small remote hull repair system II
# Medium remote hull repair system II
# Large remote hull repair system II
# Bomb launcher II
# Micro auxiliary power core II
# Small tractor beam II
# Capital tractor beam II
# Warp disruption field generator II
So is it just me that wanna know the stats on these? |
Sverige Pahis
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
359
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:24:00 -
[84] - Quote
Ryna Ithra wrote:# Warfare link II
# Mining Foreman link II
# Core probe launcher II
# Drone link augmentor II
# Omnidirectional tracking link II
# Drone tracking computer II
# Siege module II
# Triage module II
# Small remote hull repair system II
# Medium remote hull repair system II
# Large remote hull repair system II
# Bomb launcher II
# Micro auxiliary power core II
# Small tractor beam II
# Capital tractor beam II
# Warp disruption field generator II
So is it just me that wanna know the stats on these?
Yes, the rest of us have known for a long time now. |
Neo Agricola
BLACK-MARK
106
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:25:00 -
[85] - Quote
Archetype 66 wrote:CCP Veritas, CCP Veritas, CCP Veritas ?!? ( Did I respect the process ?) Might you explain us what is that ? "When a jump portal is active on a ship it cannot receive remote assistance. This is now clearly shown on attributes"
Perhaps:
they made so many good changes, they needed at least 1 thing to pYss a few people off?
DISSONANCE is recruiting Members: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=70361#post70361
Black-Mark Alliance Recruitment: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6710 |
Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
58
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:25:00 -
[86] - Quote
Ryna Ithra wrote:# Warfare link II
# Mining Foreman link II
# Core probe launcher II
# Drone link augmentor II
# Omnidirectional tracking link II
# Drone tracking computer II
# Siege module II
# Triage module II
# Small remote hull repair system II
# Medium remote hull repair system II
# Large remote hull repair system II
# Bomb launcher II
# Micro auxiliary power core II
# Small tractor beam II
# Capital tractor beam II
# Warp disruption field generator II
So is it just me that wanna know the stats on these?
All i can say... some of them don't worth a squat... |
Esrevid Nekkeg
Justified and Ancient
73
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:35:00 -
[87] - Quote
jonnykefka wrote:# The Jumps API no longer shows jumps into wormhole space.
I beg your pardon?
Just to make completely sure here:
1. We will now not have the "jump history" for any system in w-space.
2. We will still have the "NPC kill" and "player kill" information.
Assuming my interpretation of that is correct, that makes it very hard to determine if a w-space system has been active lately. It's something we'll adapt to, but was that one run by the CSM or really anyone before being launched? I would definitely have had some feedback on that, to the effect of "hour-old data about whether someone has activated a wormhole in system may not mean much on the face of it, but it can be critical information for us."
Rationale please? I second this. I can imagine what the answer can or will be (We don't want 'easy' intel in/for W-space), but I would like to get an answer from CCP to make it official.
As for the rest of the novella that is called 'Crucible: Patch-notes', it was a real pleasure to read and I am really looking forward to see all the changes implemented. Onwards! To the future!
But please answer the one question above.
Here I used to have a sig of our old Camper in space. Now it is disregarded as being the wrong format.
Looking out the window I see one thing: Nothing wrong with the format of our Camper! Silly CCP......
|
Sverige Pahis
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
360
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:37:00 -
[88] - Quote
Hi CCP please don't make the dropping dictor bubble aggression change, thanks! |
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P
C C P Alliance
447
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:42:00 -
[89] - Quote
I am excited about this!
CCP Punkturis | EVE UI Developer |
|
Tore Vest
Vikinghall
81
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:42:00 -
[90] - Quote
Sverige Pahis wrote:Hi CCP please don't make the dropping dictor bubble aggression change, thanks!
HahahahaHahahaahaaaa...
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |