| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
217
   |
Posted - 2014.11.30 13:35:26 -
[1] - Quote
I usually don't make this kind of topics, but it seemed a good idea to do so this time.
Many of us would like to see the upcoming T3 Minmatar Destroyer to be vertical. Right now all existing destroyers are quite lineal; while that certainly isn't a bad thing, new ones are a good opportunity to explore new concepts, unless CCP's vision of destroyers is that of horizontal ships.
I think the best way of showing our support for the vertical concept is to do so explicitally, so that is the purpose of this topic:
Comment here if you want the T3 Minmatar destroyer to be vertical!
Of course, if you don't want it to be vertical, say so too! Everyone's voice should be heard.
To help designing and mental visualizing, here are some examples:
- Rupture
- Naglfar
- Tyrfing
- Concept 1
- Concept 2
- Non-EVE example (still a human ship) |
Ix Method
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
343
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 13:44:20 -
[2] - Quote
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes. Be a bit disraught if it was any of those designs mind 
Travelling at the speed of love.
|
Vodka Kovalevski
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 13:46:15 -
[3] - Quote
yes! need moar vertical ship :3 |
Arla Sarain
151
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 13:50:18 -
[4] - Quote
Kinda wish concept 1 was a Hyena/Vigil redesign. |
Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
83
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 15:43:43 -
[5] - Quote
I love tall ships!
+1 from me.
--Gadget
Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck
|
Bullet Therapist
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
199
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 19:16:11 -
[6] - Quote
I'm OK with this. I always loved the look of the nag anyhow. |
Iain Cariaba
662
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 19:26:30 -
[7] - Quote
Vertical, yes. Resembling any of the examples given, no. Well, the first one isn't too bad, but the second one looks like a rusty myrmidon, and the third one doesn't look like it'll fall apart if you fart in its general direction.
EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.
|
BadAssMcKill
ElitistOps
913
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 19:32:33 -
[8] - Quote
Vertical is p overrated |
Valid Point
The Desolate Order
Brave Collective
33
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 23:45:08 -
[9] - Quote
I fully support this, +1 |
James Baboli
Ferrous Infernum
300
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 23:51:07 -
[10] - Quote
Minmatar must retain vertical superiority.
Making battleships worth the warp
Tech 3 battleships.
Moar battleships
|
Helios Panala
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 00:23:34 -
[11] - Quote
I kind of want a Glaive now. |
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
680
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 00:34:26 -
[12] - Quote
concept 1... second one looks to much like a myrm
|
oohthey ioh
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 02:53:22 -
[13] - Quote
Yes, to all 3, love them all |
HiddenPorpoise
Under Dark
Sins of our Fathers
282
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 03:05:16 -
[14] - Quote
I demand a coronal gallente T3 to go with the cat. |
Torgeir Hekard
I MYSELF AND ME
92
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 09:54:25 -
[15] - Quote
I would like a vertical destroyer please, but the choice between a skeleton maulus, a rotting zombie myrm and a caldari station kinda puts me off  |
Syrias Bizniz
Krautfleet
386
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 09:56:37 -
[16] - Quote
Vertical is the new not-horizontal! |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
221
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:17:29 -
[17] - Quote
Torgeir Hekard wrote:I would like a vertical destroyer please, but the choice between a skeleton maulus, a rotting zombie myrm and a caldari station kinda puts me off Fair point :) fear not! Those were just some visual examples of what I was talking about, as do the already existing ships mentioned before those. The Minmatar D3 doesn't have to be like any of those! Editing OP to clear that out.
|
Nagarythe Tinurandir
House of Freedom
The Pursuit of Happiness
190
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 11:33:04 -
[18] - Quote
+1 make it so.. |
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
623
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 12:07:30 -
[19] - Quote
YEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
So much support from me, I'm sad over the fact that nag and oracle are the only vertical ships.
They are the only ones I think. Correct me if I am wrong.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Medalyn Isis
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
448
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 12:13:32 -
[20] - Quote
Yes, I was going to suggest this also. +1 for a vertical destroyer, preferably minmatar as the naglfar is the best looking ship. |
Mr Floydy
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
250
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:27:00 -
[21] - Quote
+1 more Vertical ships. |
Shivanthar
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
132
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
It is logical to assume that not vertical ship concept is not logical. (2^vertical ship) & (2^minmatar philosopy) > 0 should be true.
Seems logical O.o
_Half _the lies they tell about me **aren't **true.
|
Rakaar
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 18:59:26 -
[23] - Quote
Hell Yes |
Jesto Harbing
Ghost Machinations
8
|
Posted - 2014.12.09 19:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
Bump. +1 for vertical! =) |
Thrillans Painhaus
Dodixie Customs Enforcement
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.09 20:26:05 -
[25] - Quote
Iain Cariaba wrote:the third one doesn't look like it'll fall apart if you fart in its general direction.
So then it's a perfect minmatar ship!
Also +1 to vertical ship. |
Fifth Blade
The Nyan Cat Pirates
Disband.
38
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 01:05:32 -
[26] - Quote
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L |
Meloni HELL
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu
Test Alliance Please Ignore
21
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 07:33:39 -
[27] - Quote
Vertical with fins / sails would be fantastic! Fin-sail-things are very important - they are needed for Ladar targeting.
|
Skymyst Titan
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 18:40:49 -
[28] - Quote
+1 for vertical
Tank mode:
While in tank mode the ship will deploy magic ductape that will wrap all around the ship 90+ to all resistances
Speed mode:
While in speed mode 420% to max velocity. 90% reduced capacitor usage for Microwarpdrives
Snipe mode:
While in snipe mode all turrets will gain an additional 6,9 AU added to their optimal range
Role bonus:
Cannot be nerfed by CCP
pls add |
Cataphrac
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 19:40:08 -
[29] - Quote
+1.
Vertical with lots of rust and broken edges. |
Wolf Incaelum
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 21:18:45 -
[30] - Quote
The second concept looks like a Myrmidon and a Rupture shagged. Lol. +1 to the general idea.
ANARCHYFOREVAAARRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!
|
Dau Katari
Stormsong Scrapyards
5
|
Posted - 2014.12.13 16:01:57 -
[31] - Quote
+1 for vertical, sharp, and mean.
The ways the characteristic radiator "wingy bits" could be incorporated into the different modes and animations make me think of a cross between an angry insect and a rusty caltrop. |
Iain Cariaba
739
|
Posted - 2014.12.13 16:49:20 -
[32] - Quote
Thrillans Painhaus wrote:Iain Cariaba wrote:the third one doesn't look like it'll fall apart if you fart in its general direction. So then it's a perfect minmatar ship! Also +1 to vertical ship.
No, it can't be a minmatar ship unless it looks like it'll fall apart if you give it a dirty look.
Edit: curse you, autocorrect
EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.
|
Uriel Paradisi Anteovnuecci
Jovian Labs
Jovian Enterprises
13613
|
Posted - 2014.12.13 18:04:02 -
[33] - Quote
Absolutely! This is a necessity- make it so
+1 and more if I could
A City made of Wood is built in the forest
A City made of Stone is built in the mountains
But a City made of Dreams...is built in heaven.
Jovian Proverb GÖâ
|
Imogen Davongale
Sparkle Knights of the Nine Seas
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 15:17:54 -
[34] - Quote
I choose for my first post on the forums to be a firm demand for moar vertical destroyers!
I approve this message. |
Pliskkenn
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
12
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 15:41:54 -
[35] - Quote
Vertical? No. Diagonal. Yes / \ It makes no difference. |
Tinukeda'ya Naskingar
Minmatar Expeditions ltd.
57
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 15:42:30 -
[36] - Quote
Definitely
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
|
Kane Fenris
NWP
156
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 21:02:21 -
[37] - Quote
+1 for vertical nuff said |
Generaloberst Kluntz
Isogen 5
41
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 21:07:35 -
[38] - Quote
Yup.
Also I'm sad that Minnie ships used to have lots more spikes. Now they're too polished! Where's all the duct tape and all the rust?
The nado used to be a lot more badass.
Gimme spikes back! |
Generaloberst Kluntz
Isogen 5
41
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 21:10:15 -
[39] - Quote
Skymyst Titan wrote:+1 for vertical
Tank mode:
While in tank mode the ship will deploy magic ductape that will wrap all around the ship 90+ to all resistances
Speed mode:
While in speed mode 420% to max velocity. 90% reduced capacitor usage for Microwarpdrives
Snipe mode:
While in snipe mode all turrets will gain an additional 6,9 AU added to their optimal range
Role bonus:
Cannot be nerfed by CCP
pls add
And its name is gonna be
VIOLATOR. |
Jake Shifter
Dark Holes Imperium
9
|
Posted - 2014.12.23 21:27:53 -
[40] - Quote
Boy oh boy do i want that baby Naglfar |
SIrera Artrald
Titans Rising
57
|
Posted - 2014.12.24 07:52:24 -
[41] - Quote
Plus wan!
P.S. Better example of vertical win ---> http://timmon26.deviantart.com/art/quot-Cleaver-quot-Minmatar-Frigate-182467442
Life is a bitch but she's totally doable. She may be a beauty but life, life is a bitch.
|
Orange Something
Shadow Garrison
1
|
Posted - 2014.12.24 09:26:45 -
[42] - Quote
At first I didn't like this idea. Then I remembered Vertical Supremacy. +1 |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
256
|
Posted - 2014.12.24 13:04:36 -
[43] - Quote
Oh wow! Added to the OP
|
Bob Maths
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2014.12.24 14:28:31 -
[44] - Quote
It needs to be vertical with a spoke going outwards from the middle so it can be used as a transformer for a Max-Matar ship (this will be a t3 battleship comprised of different hulls, the hulls are in fact 'subsystems'), this would be the connectors for the joints.
So for instance,
The Fenrir could be used as the body and Naglfars can be used as the limbs, Stabbers would form the fingers and the Rupture would be the thumb. The hand would be a scimitar and the feet would be a hoarder with its toes being shuttles for the smallest toe, a talwar for the normal sized toes and a thrasher as a big toe. The typhoon would of course be the head as it's a battleship class. For its armanents, the Nidhoggur would be the shield and the ragnorak would be its sword of which it would exact mighty justice against the evil enslavers of the Amarr. |
Elwha Lynx
The Red Island Foundation
Shadow Cartel
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 21:01:52 -
[45] - Quote
Vertical is fine (as long as it isn't a shoe), but it really needs the traditional cooling fins. |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
264
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 21:22:48 -
[46] - Quote
Elwha Lynx wrote:Vertical is fine (as long as it isn't a shoe), but it really needs the traditional cooling fins. Agree about those cooling fins! That's why I like concepts 1 and 3 so much.
|
Kentai Kado
Red Planet Coalition
Interstellar Confederation
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 10:00:54 -
[47] - Quote
I like the concept 3, this is a cool design. And you see, this is a minmatar chip |
Rose Roses
Artificial Memories
Vertical.
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 10:34:52 -
[48] - Quote
Yes to a vertical T3 destroyer! |
Alia Ravenswing
DARK HAT
26
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 11:00:17 -
[49] - Quote
ANOTHER vertical ship?
Along with the Tornado |
Abby Silverwind
Demonic Retribution
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 11:30:59 -
[50] - Quote
+1from me
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
for you are with me;
Your rod and your staff,
they comfort me.
|
Azda Ja
Green Skull LLC
2494
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 12:04:51 -
[51] - Quote
Gimme.
Please?
"I only lose ships when I fly with Azda." - Barry Cuttlefish
GSLLC Recruitment
Join Today!
|
CALAMYTY DIVA
Vizzam Tribe Society
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 14:31:58 -
[52] - Quote
Bob Maths wrote:It needs to be vertical with a spoke going outwards from the middle so it can be used as a transformer for a Max-Matar ship (this will be a t3 battleship comprised of different hulls, the hulls are in fact 'subsystems'), this would be the connectors for the joints.
So for instance,
The Fenrir could be used as the body and Naglfars can be used as the limbs, Stabbers would form the fingers and the Rupture would be the thumb. The hand would be a scimitar and the feet would be a hoarder with its toes being shuttles for the smallest toe, a talwar for the normal sized toes and a thrasher as a big toe. The typhoon would of course be the head as it's a battleship class. For its armanents, the Nidhoggur would be the shield and the ragnorak would be its sword of which it would exact mighty justice against the evil enslavers of the Amarr.
And Mastodont will be his...umm...between legs thingie :-P |
Gabriel Elarik
Celestiel Rams
1
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 14:52:28 -
[53] - Quote
+1 |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
3211
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 15:01:40 -
[54] - Quote
I guarantee that the artwork for the Matari T3 Destroyer is already decided on and underway, given that the ship has to be ready by February, which means deployed to SiSi in less than a month. |
Ronny Hugo
Dark Fusion Industries
Limitless Redux
74
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 16:19:32 -
[55] - Quote
Komodo Askold wrote:I usually don't make this kind of topics, but it seemed a good idea to do so this time.
Many of us would like to see the upcoming T3 Minmatar Destroyer to be vertical.
I'd like new ships to look like science-fiction, not fantasy. And if you make a vertical ship, assuming the rocket engine is the middle, then the top and bottom have to be needlessly strong and heavy so that they don't break off when you give it some throttle. There's a reason the ship in avatar don't look like the naglfar.
I don't like the ships that look like the inquisitor (two engines at each side of the ship, massively difficult to control) and tormentor (only engines at the top, it would simply spin around and around). Or any other fantasy-esque designs that don't even try to make sense. Stahp it CCP! |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
266
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 17:48:51 -
[56] - Quote
Ronny Hugo wrote:Komodo Askold wrote:I usually don't make this kind of topics, but it seemed a good idea to do so this time.
Many of us would like to see the upcoming T3 Minmatar Destroyer to be vertical. I'd like new ships to look like science-fiction, not fantasy. And if you make a vertical ship, assuming the rocket engine is the middle, then the top and bottom have to be needlessly strong and heavy so that they don't break off when you give it some throttle. There's a reason the ship in avatar don't look like the naglfar. I don't like the ships that look like the inquisitor (two engines at each side of the ship, massively difficult to control) and tormentor (only engines at the top, it would simply spin around and around). Or any other fantasy-esque designs that don't even try to make sense. Stahp it CCP! I know about its structural issues; I'm an aerospace engineer. But hey, this is 25,000 years into the future. We have gigantic space stations and spaceships, warp travel, FTL communications... and our ships turn without any visible thrusters (I always thought they do via local micro-warping of spacetime). I'm pretty sure we can make sure a vertical ship does not fall apart when we start its engines  |
Alexis Nightwish
67
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 20:31:47 -
[57] - Quote
Not a fan of any of the examples, but a vertical T3 dessy would be awesome. +1
Even better, IMO, would be that the ship is vertical in one or two of it's modes, and non-vertical in the other. For example in sniping mode it is vertical, and in the other modes it is not.
Power Projection: A Brighter Future
|
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
4438
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 20:51:31 -
[58] - Quote
Skymyst Titan wrote:+1 for vertical
Tank mode:
While in tank mode the ship will deploy magic ductape that will wrap all around the ship 90+ to all resistances
Speed mode:
While in speed mode 420% to max velocity. 90% reduced capacitor usage for Microwarpdrives
Snipe mode:
While in snipe mode all turrets will gain an additional 6,9 AU added to their optimal range
Role bonus:
Cannot be nerfed by CCP
pls add
Yes please to vertical
Side note: I vote also that Minmatar ships should have exclusive ability to substitute duct tape for nanite paste.
Upgrading Local to Eliminate All AFK Influence
What if Local Chat changed, Hunting the Cloaked...
|
kingduckling
Merchants Trade Consortium
The Last Chancers.
1
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 00:59:14 -
[59] - Quote
Do it ccp!!!!!!! |
Catherine Laartii
Dominion Fleet Group
Templis CALSF
452
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 01:52:36 -
[60] - Quote
I like concept 3 the best; it has a lot of potential for mode transforming from a model standpoint |
Alena McJenkins
Reluctant Warriors
Disorganized Outcasts
5
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 05:42:48 -
[61] - Quote
Ooh, more vertical ships! This idea makes me happy in my pants.
+1
This signature apparently cannot be scanned.
|
Steppa Musana
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
12
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 12:39:30 -
[62] - Quote
Mini Tornado Transformer please.
+1 |
Althalus Stenory
Flying Blacksmiths
51
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 12:45:10 -
[63] - Quote
+1 :D |
Lauramitus
United Star Alliance
UNITED STAR FEDERATION
10
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 14:06:42 -
[64] - Quote
YES! Let us have this! |
Jack Derata
North American Tax Shelter Commission
1
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 04:19:37 -
[65] - Quote
I saw this in a cursory search and was compelled to reply. I'm putting my hat in for a vertical Minmatar T3 Destroyer. The Tornado and Naglfar are some of my favorite ship designs in the game.
I'm sure there are people who still think the Loki is along the wrong axis, but with this T3 release, I think it's pertinent. |
Sweet Trader
The Hollow Men
34
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 10:58:22 -
[66] - Quote
Do it! Do it now! |
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Farsaidh's Freeborn
884
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 12:06:24 -
[67] - Quote
Jack Derata wrote:
Take the Catalyst, and its elongated wing design. If it were flipped 90 degrees, it would be a vertical ship.
...
My Catalyst *is* vertical. You lot just fly on the wrong axis/90 degrees out of phase (scientific evidence has yet to be conclusive). |
Anthar Thebess
828
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 13:30:34 -
[68] - Quote
I don't see any reason why not ;) |
Mattpat139 Sukarala
Black Fox Marauders
Spaceship Bebop
11
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 13:57:21 -
[69] - Quote
I'm going to allow this. 
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5376912#post5376912
|
kelvin oriley
Zero-Kelvin
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 18:21:40 -
[70] - Quote
hell yes |
Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders
Spaceship Bebop
3293
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 18:34:42 -
[71] - Quote
Yessss!
Make space glamorous!
Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!
|
Vampyr3
Blat X
3
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 18:22:08 -
[72] - Quote
Yes. With Bells On.
Maybe a better one? Could once have a ship where in defensive mode it's an upright ship, and then when the ship "shifts" to a speed mode, it reorients the bulk of it's body so it becomes a long thin ship, and shifts perhaps into a catalyst-like posture when in sniper mode?
This might be a bit difficult. essentially, the part that contains the pilot remains in the same alignment, and the body rotates on two axis around it, possibly further reconfiguring it's layout, panels moving, streamlining in speed mode (I know that it's space and therefore aerodynamics are not an issue, but it would LOOK cool  )
|
Aeril Malkyre
Knights of the Ouroboros
386
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 20:25:51 -
[73] - Quote
Yes, yes, and more yes. Vertical is the only way to go.
Or shifting from vertical to horizontal when it changes modes. THAT would be amazing. In fact, for hilarity:
Defensive |
Speed --
Sniper / |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
276
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 22:20:28 -
[74] - Quote
Vampyr3 wrote:Yes. With Bells On. Maybe a better one? Could once have a ship where in defensive mode it's an upright ship, and then when the ship "shifts" to a speed mode, it reorients the bulk of it's body so it becomes a long thin ship, and shifts perhaps into a catalyst-like posture when in sniper mode? This might be a bit difficult. essentially, the part that contains the pilot remains in the same alignment, and the body rotates on two axis around it, possibly further reconfiguring it's layout, panels moving, streamlining in speed mode (I know that it's space and therefore aerodynamics are not an issue, but it would LOOK cool )
Aeril Malkyre wrote:Yes, yes, and more yes. Vertical is the only way to go. Or shifting from vertical to horizontal when it changes modes. THAT would be amazing. In fact, for hilarity: Defensive |
Speed --
Sniper / Oooh I like that I'd love if it changed like that. Perhaps with the body made of around 3 distinct parts, each one on top of the other, that slided back and forth between modes. |
Nightingale Actault
Big Richard Club
Ghosts of Deep Space
107
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 23:44:41 -
[75] - Quote
+1 |
Uriel Paradisi Anteovnuecci
Jovian Labs
Jovian Enterprises
15887
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 00:16:37 -
[76] - Quote
Still +1, and +1 to Vamp's suggestion
A City made of Wood is built in the forest
A City made of Stone is built in the mountains
But a City made of Dreams...is built in heaven.
Jovian Proverb GÖâ
|
Hairpins Blueprint
CBC Interstellar
Fidelas Constans
123
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 00:50:29 -
[77] - Quote
Komodo Askold wrote:I usually don't make this kind of topics, but it seemed a good idea to do so this time. Many of us would like to see the upcoming T3 Minmatar Destroyer to be vertical. Right now all existing destroyers are quite lineal; while that certainly isn't a bad thing, new ones are a good opportunity to explore new concepts, unless CCP's vision of destroyers is that of horizontal ships. I think the best way of showing our support for the vertical concept is to do so explicitally, so that is the purpose of this topic: Comment here if you want the T3 Minmatar destroyer to be vertical!Of course, if you don't want it to be vertical, say so too! Everyone's voice should be heard. To help designing and mental visualizing, here are some examples: - Rupture - Naglfar - Tyrfing - Concept 1- Concept 2- Concept 3- Non-EVE example (still a human ship)- Another non-EVE exampleEDIT: remember these are just examples; the final ship does not have to be like any of them. EDIT 2: another example. EDIT 3: another great example from SIrera Artrald (Concept 3). EDIT 4: please don't forget about the cooling fins! Very good examples at concepts 1 and 3.
Way are we not funding this! +1
|
Juan Mileghere
Incident Command
Southern Star Dominion
1
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 01:32:52 -
[78] - Quote
This sounds great +1 |
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
The Kadeshi
1133
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 21:01:06 -
[79] - Quote
And CCP has just shown in o7 that they don't pay attention to the community. Seems like it's a horizontal destroyer after all. |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
278
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 22:03:57 -
[80] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:And CCP has just shown in o7 that they don't pay attention to the community. Seems like it's a horizontal destroyer after all. Ooooooh 
Well, as they say it's just one of the 3 modes, and even they are not much sure about wether it's horizontal or not. Hey, maybe there's still hope... It looks quite nice though.
|
Ix Method
Shadows Legion
High-Sec Tomfoolery
383
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 10:39:11 -
[81] - Quote
Ouch, my heart just broke
Travelling at the speed of love.
|
Kenrailae
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
327
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:16:11 -
[82] - Quote
Vertical would be a nice change, as long as it's mostly symmetric.
The Law is a point of View
|
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
278
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 12:24:48 -
[83] - Quote
Updated the OP with the released concept art. |
Vampyr3
Blat X
6
|
Posted - 2015.01.20 22:04:10 -
[84] - Quote
Vampyr3 wrote:Yes. With Bells On. Maybe a better one? Could once have a ship where in defensive mode it's an upright ship, and then when the ship "shifts" to a speed mode, it reorients the bulk of it's body so it becomes a long thin ship, and shifts perhaps into a catalyst-like posture when in sniper mode? This might be a bit difficult. essentially, the part that contains the pilot remains in the same alignment, and the body rotates on two axis around it, possibly further reconfiguring it's layout, panels moving, streamlining in speed mode (I know that it's space and therefore aerodynamics are not an issue, but it would LOOK cool )
Called it.
|
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Quantum Distributions
1364
|
Posted - 2015.01.20 22:52:01 -
[85] - Quote
http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/66828/1/Svipul.jpg
Two modes are close enough to vertical me thinks.
New player resources:
Uni Wiki - General Info
Eve Altruist - PvP
Belligerent Undesirables - High Sec Pvp
|
Aran Hotchkiss
Phoibe Enterprises
57
|
Posted - 2015.01.20 22:54:23 -
[86] - Quote
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/66828/1/Svipul.jpg
Two modes are close enough to vertical me thinks.
Aww Hell yeah
Shamelessly stole this line,
Alternatively, QFT
One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia
|
Ix Method
Shadows Legion
High-Sec Tomfoolery
385
|
Posted - 2015.01.20 23:57:08 -
[87] - Quote
You might be the best ever.
Travelling at the speed of love.
|
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
279
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 14:16:43 -
[88] - Quote
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/66828/1/Svipul.jpg
Two modes are close enough to vertical me thinks. Oh wow! That looks pretty good. Nice to see some verticalness after all!
Btw, those vertical modes look like it's going to start walking, isn't it?
Updating OP.
You nailed it! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |