| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Lusulpher
Blackwater Syndicate
Systematic-Chaos
   |
Posted - 2010.03.04 10:06:00 -
[1801]
 Originally by: Sojanth
Edited by: Sojanth on 21/02/2010 21:09:51
There are several things in EVE that appear to be in place to purposely frustrate, annoy, and waste players time.
Nothing does all three of these better than a POS.
Frustrating and annoying are one thing, but the giant waste of time that POS's induce is a big fat "F".
Getting stuck between arrays, having to move things from one hanger to another...that seems to always be out of range. Abnoxious fueling mechanics, inability to name hangers and other structures to reference them, broken capacity indicators, inability to refit Tech III ships, and inability to segregate peoples items more readily, and ammo disappearing from guns... all suck.
This proposal would go a long way to making living out in the wilds a bit more palatable.
For those of us who have to live out of our POSs -- disappointing is an understatement
Signed/
Amen
Hallelujah.
This is probably my third time bumping this. Fighting the "good fight" I guess...
 7 |
Mjinko
|
Posted - 2010.03.04 11:38:00 -
[1802]
Bump....ccp give this guy a job !!
|
Krennel Darius
Caldari
Nova Security Systems
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 07:55:00 -
[1803]
*Breaks out the whip*
_________________________________________________
If at first you don't succeed, you're not Chuck Norris |
Fohacidal
SPORADIC MOVEMENT
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 04:37:00 -
[1804]
Bump
dont die on me now dawg!
|
Gerard Deneth
Caldari
Pavlov Labs GmBH
Independent Faction
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 20:27:00 -
[1805]
Flogging the POS some more. I have to deal with this stuff on a daily basis and I heartily support everything in here.
----------------------------
The Game's always changing under your feet; don't start moaning when you get a toe caught in the gears. |
hikuson
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 16:36:00 -
[1806]
Originally by: Fohacidal
Bump
dont die on me now dawg!
Don't worry, it wont die, not until ccp take this thread and implement at least 1/2 of it anyway.
|
odama jasonsson
Caldari
Asteroid Cowboys
Pest Control Union
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 18:56:00 -
[1807]
Time to flog the 'ole trusty pos treath again....
|
Agent Kenshin
Public Security Section IX
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 20:36:00 -
[1808]
I'll give it a good flogging; someone needs to make sure the CSM harasses CCP about this until they do something. The ideas are here it's a matter of kicking some peoples butts into gear. I know this is a challenge but they already have POS style structures linked together in agent missions. 
-----
I wish I still had my old Rizzy sig. :(
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 23:16:00 -
[1809]
Originally by: Agent Kenshin
I'll give it a good flogging; someone needs to make sure the CSM harasses CCP about this until they do something. The ideas are here it's a matter of kicking some peoples butts into gear. I know this is a challenge but they already have POS style structures linked together in agent missions.
CSM4 took it back to ccp with less then surprising results, as such, I would say, we don't expect the CSM to get anywhere else with this and just keep the idea alive for a few more years, till CCP gets tired of seeing it.
The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
HeliosGal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.03.10 05:30:00 -
[1810]
Planetary interaction how will this change things
NPC goods and other things sourced form planets
What happened to fuel pellets idea where u manfacture all the materials into a pallet and each pose uses so many pellets per hour - this could be tied into new planetary industrial interaction
Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00 |
|
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.10 13:50:00 -
[1811]
Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 10/03/2010 13:52:37
Originally by: HeliosGal
Planetary interaction how will this change things
NPC goods and other things sourced form planets
What happened to fuel pellets idea where u manfacture all the materials into a pallet and each pose uses so many pellets per hour - this could be tied into new planetary industrial interaction
Sadly, I don't see us getting fuel pellets any time soon.
List of top 10 things everyone would love to see on pos's but will prob never happen.
1. Fuel Pellets
2. Anchor and Online queue (no more baby sitting pos's while they are being setup)
3. Modular Pos
4. Fighterbays
5. New UI
6. Pos access by standings (this one might happen SOONÖ)
7. Jump Bridge toll
8. Pos Gunners get pos attacked mail (this one might happen SOONÖ)
9. Missile Batteries stay online while in RF
10. Centralized Hangers.
I don't take credit of any of these suggestions, and a few of them came from other pos related threads in F&I, I think the dead horse pos thread represents our wanting change to the system as a whole more then just the gfx updates it suggests, and you can tell that by all the replys with different ideas
These are just some of the best Idea's in this thread, while I would love to see all of them put into the game, even if CCP did 1/2 of them, Im sure pos managers everywhere would be a lot happier.
The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
Esiel
Renegade Serenity
|
Posted - 2010.03.15 17:18:00 -
[1812]
Edited by: Esiel on 15/03/2010 17:18:55
Syber I suggest you change the order our #1 request - modularization (is that a word?) I want a station not a stick with large parts floating nearby.
...
Beat the dead horse |
Lekegolo Khanid
|
Posted - 2010.03.15 18:18:00 -
[1813]
Currently with POSes you have to be near a structure to tinker with it right? What if with this idea there was walking in POSes, giving the player access to tinker with everything connected from the control tower, maybe have it so you need a hanger. I dunno how gunners work but maybe that could be tied in too. Would be pretty cool. |
Syberbolt8
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 13:39:00 -
[1814]
Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 16/03/2010 13:40:34
Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 16/03/2010 13:40:19
Originally by: Esiel
Edited by: Esiel on 15/03/2010 17:18:55
Syber I suggest you change the order our #1 request - modularization (is that a word?) I want a station not a stick with large parts floating nearby.
How about the order I would like to see it in? lol I did say that list was in no real order.. 
1. Modular Pos
2. New UI
3. Fuel Pellets
4. Anchor and Online queue (no more baby sitting pos's while they are being setup)
5. Centralized Hangers.
6. Fighterbays
7. Pos Gunners get pos attacked mail (this one might happen SOONÖ)
8. Pos access by standings (this one might happen SOONÖ)
9. Jump Bridge toll
10. Missile Batteries stay online while in RF
The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
JeanLuc Blindtard
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 13:49:00 -
[1815]
You people are sick... you realize what you're saying??
You're saying that CCP would make the poses actually look cool and be something fun and interesting.
Afaik These will never happen as long as people keep paying for eve the way it is now...
10/10 for the effort and thank you for the nice dream but I think it will grow old and unnoticed like the "bounty hunters" profession idea...
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 13:51:00 -
[1816]
Originally by: JeanLuc Blindtard
You people are sick... you realize what you're saying??
You're saying that CCP would make the poses actually look cool and be something fun and interesting.
Afaik These will never happen as long as people keep paying for eve the way it is now...
10/10 for the effort and thank you for the nice dream but I think it will grow old and unnoticed like the "bounty hunters" profession idea...
LOL, check the date on the OP..
also thanks for the bump and interest 
The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
OMG No
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 15:55:00 -
[1817]
Even tough the OP is old, the issue is more then valid.
I like it.
Stupid flying around the shield to anchor everything floating unconnected in space...
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 16:05:00 -
[1818]
Originally by: OMG No
Even tough the OP is old, the issue is more then valid.
I like it.
Stupid flying around the shield to anchor everything floating unconnected in space...
you do know you dont have to fly around to anchor stuff right? you can just move the anchor widget around and select anchor and the pos mod will move there...
Aye, I agree, very valid issue, CCP however disagrees that its a major issue, 2nd time its been to CCP in Iceland with the CSM, 2nd time its been shot down. So We will keep this going forever or till eve dies.
The Resurrection: Support the Revised Dead Horse Pos thread in Assembly Hall |
NeoFusion
Caldari
Freelancer Union
Unaffiliated
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 12:43:00 -
[1819]
Bump for fantastic ideas
|
Xeross155
Minmatar
Fusion Death Inc.
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 15:15:00 -
[1820]
+1 this system looks pretty damn good, CCP give your own spin to it if you want but at least make the POSs continue the excellence theme from last FanFest
---------------------------------------------
Xeross' ventures into EVE |
|
|
Ivanna Nuke
Gallente
Daralux
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 15:16:00 -
[1821]
I think as a byproduct of various types of high end reactions, a rare occurance could happen. In this occurance we would see the creation of a single piece of cowbell. This highly valued commodity would sell for hundreds of millions.
|
Titus Balls
Minmatar
Balls Independent Traders
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 15:18:00 -
[1822]
Originally by: Ivanna Nuke
I think as a byproduct of various types of high end reactions, a rare occurance could happen. In this occurance we would see the creation of a single piece of cowbell. This highly valued commodity would sell for hundreds of millions.
I'm sorry to disagree, but I think it would need more.
Also +1 from me for this thread, please give some POS loving CCP
|
Ivanna Nuke
Gallente
Daralux
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 15:25:00 -
[1823]
Originally by: Titus Balls
Originally by: Ivanna Nuke
I think as a byproduct of various types of high end reactions, a rare occurance could happen. In this occurance we would see the creation of a single piece of cowbell. This highly valued commodity would sell for hundreds of millions.
I'm sorry to disagree, but I think it would need more.
Also +1 from me for this thread, please give some POS loving CCP
/Agreed, can never have enough cowbell.
|
Krennel Darius
Caldari
Nova Security Systems
|
Posted - 2010.03.20 19:14:00 -
[1824]
Gotta have me new shiny POS!
_________________________________________________
If at first you don't succeed, you're not Chuck Norris |
Finn McCaan
|
Posted - 2010.03.21 18:58:00 -
[1825]
See this is the sort of thing i imagined POS's to be when my freind was gushing about eve.
How about T2 pos's like this? More depth more complexity - we like these things...Keep hammering away.
|
Dacryphile
|
Posted - 2010.03.22 02:05:00 -
[1826]
Daily flogging.
Originally by: Doc Robertson
...take a good look at this pic and tell us which one is you.
|
Erik Finnegan
Gallente
Polytechnique Gallenteenne
|
Posted - 2010.03.22 18:42:00 -
[1827]
I wished they were pretty.
Oh, and can I have boarding sleeves in stations, too ? Didn't hear of beaming on and off a ship yet in EVE....
----
Erik Finnegan, CSM III Delegate (retired)
|
Mekela
|
Posted - 2010.03.24 19:20:00 -
[1828]
So what are the reasons CCP isn't doing this? I don't understand they have done alot of things that don't change gameplay. (updated graphics for ships, planets...) why is it so hard for them to do some updating for POS's?
|
Beta Miner
|
Posted - 2010.03.25 03:38:00 -
[1829]
Bump
|
Cyberman Mastermind
|
Posted - 2010.03.25 05:27:00 -
[1830]
Edited by: Cyberman Mastermind on 25/03/2010 05:28:06
Originally by: Mekela
So what are the reasons CCP isn't doing this? I don't understand they have done alot of things that don't change gameplay. (updated graphics for ships, planets...) why is it so hard for them to do some updating for POS's?
Old code.
Very old code.
(My guess at least.)
No one dares going near it. Besides, why bother? New shiny stuff brings new money. Old money stays anyway :-(
I think they're waiting for some divine intervention when something completely new will be introduced that can replace the POS system entirely. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |