| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
252
   |
Posted - 2015.02.02 21:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would like to know if the NDA is stifling and/or narrowing out of game opinions from bloggers, podcasters, and other eve media persona.
I would like the NDA not to fall under the NDA, and like the CSM White Paper to be open to the public,
so future CSM candidates know what to expect between a future role as CSM member and CCP games before signing the NDA 
source: http://jestertrek.blogspot.nl/2013/05/csm8-status-week-zero.html
The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
252
|
Posted - 2015.02.03 10:15:03 -
[2] - Quote
The NDA can cause an altered mind set, meaning a blogger, podcaster or other eve media personality was about to comment on a topic but then either has to refrain or reword or alter his/her opinion entirely that he/she had in mind.
Sometimes this can be a good thing though, I often type a reply or view and leave it there not hitting enter, coming back later to look at the meaning/wording and if it conveys the message properly.
For your example: Not bringing up Confluence because you assumed that particular site itself was NDA.
source: http://funkybacon.blogspot.nl/2015/02/a-response-to-ccp-leeloo.html
When the NDA is made public a better discussion can be had with CSM members imho, because you either know when they hide behind the NDA is bullocks.
Sion Kumitomo wrote:Sion said that the CSM hides behind the NDA more than CCP does, because the CSM can call CCP on
stuff, but CCP can't call the CSM on stuff. There's a lot of information that gets hidden behind the NDA,
so the CSM has to police and call out itself.
source page 12: http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/csm/Meetings/summit/CSM9-WS-D4.pdf
Last in the media you're used to being able to have any discussion on any topic quite freely, to interview and talk to anyone, and you're not held up with concerns for the NDA or who's feelings you might brush providing we're doing our jobs properly.
source: http://funkybacon.blogspot.nl/2015/02/aftermath-of-pissing-contest.html
So it is my opinion that the NDA must be made public like the CSM White Paper, so we can a more healthy CSM discussion in the end
The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
252
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 11:10:41 -
[3] - Quote
There is at least one CSM 9 member, Sion Kumitomo, who wants to push for greater CSM Transparency and a more open system.
Sion Kumitomo wrote:Locked doors and closed rooms do not serve democratic institutions well. They lead to abuses and excesses even amongst those of us who should certainly know better.
A first step could be to un-NDA the NDA so in the near future we can have more open debates about the CSM and it's members.
Making the NDA public would show debaters, eve media and the voting constituents the bounds (currently placed on the CSM by CCPgames) within the CSM can operate
source: http://www.themittani.com/features/transparency-and-funkybacon
The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
252
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 13:27:25 -
[4] - Quote
Freelancer117 wrote:Making the NDA public would show debaters, eve media and the voting constituents the bounds (currently placed on the CSM by CCPgames) within the CSM can operate
adding to this:
It also show HOW to phrase a question towards a CSM member or the CSM as a whole, so they can answer it without saying NDA
The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
252
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 12:45:41 -
[5] - Quote
Lykouleon wrote:
Again. NDAs are typically boiler-plate legal documents. Go and google an NDA and you'll probably find most of, if not all of, the language found in the CSM NDA minus specific content that is applicable to CCP/the CSM/etc.
After that we can discuss the joys of red lining...(which I sincerely doubt happens with the CSM NDA, but who knows!)
I hope a future CSM Transparency initiative invalidate any non applicable claim of NDA by a CSM member, even if the NDA is not un-NDA-ed
The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
| |
|