| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

David Clausewitz
The Spawning Pool Team Liquid
4
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 05:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok, I would like to trade one of the lows on my coercer for another medium because one medium-slot ships are pretty terrible and it's like impossible to kill something without a point and propulsion module. Retribution would be happy with the same deal. Please make it happen so my Coercer (and future Retribution) will actually be able to point something while maintaining a MWD/AB!
Thank you!!  |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
431
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 05:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Deal with it!
[Retribution, Solo nano gank shield unneutable unkiteable tackler] Overdrive Injector System II Heat Sink II Heat Sink II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Pseudoelectron Containment Field I
Warp Scrambler II
Dual Light Pulse Laser II Dual Light Pulse Laser II Dual Light Pulse Laser II Dual Light Pulse Laser II Small Nosferatu II
Small Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Small Core Defence Field Extender I
Don't let anything stop you! Fit a shield tackle nano Retribution! |

David Clausewitz
The Spawning Pool Team Liquid
4
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 06:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
That's not gonna be very good at catching things, and it will be even worse for the destroyer. It's just too hard to function as a small ship with only 1 medium. |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
431
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 06:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
David Clausewitz wrote:That's not gonna be very good at catching things, and it will be even worse for the destroyer. It's just too hard to function as a small ship with only 1 medium.
 |

Roderick Tazinas
24IC 1st Surplus Distribution Company
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 06:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Solo -> Vengeance. In fleet you have tacklers. You need to use the right tool for the right job. |

David Clausewitz
The Spawning Pool Team Liquid
4
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 06:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Roderick Tazinas wrote:Solo -> Vengeance. In fleet you have tacklers. You need to use the right tool for the right job.
Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution. |

Salvia Olima
FREE GATES HUN Reloaded
7
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 09:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
Get a wingman buddy. EvE is not designed to play solo all the time. |

AnzacPaul
Invictus Australis Northern Coalition.
85
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 10:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
people arguing like they don't need an extra mid......... |

Cadius Vect
Domination.
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 11:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Fit for max damage, get a buddy in a vengeance to do the tackling. |

Ines Tegator
Project ELT
30
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 16:49:00 -
[10] - Quote
There is no reason for a pvp ship to ever have only 1 midslot. If you don't have a point, most FC's will laugh you out of their fleet. Yes there are ways around it, but realistically all it does is gimp that ship in comparison to other hulls. |

Maroxus
Strategic Syndicate
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 17:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
So .. you want a Catalyst's layout. In that case can the Cormorant trade a mid for a low? To share the same slot layout of the Thrasher? Also change the Flycatcher's layout, the Sabre's 4/2 would be nice. If the Heretic won't stick with the slot layout tradition (It is a heretic after all) with 3/3 instead of 1/5, then there is no reason for the Coercer/Cormorant/Flycatcher to stick with theirs. |

IceBergSlim
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 18:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
David Clausewitz wrote:Roderick Tazinas wrote:Solo -> Vengeance. In fleet you have tacklers. You need to use the right tool for the right job. Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution.
David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down.
Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol.
|

David Clausewitz
The Spawning Pool Team Liquid
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
IceBergSlim wrote:David Clausewitz wrote:Roderick Tazinas wrote:Solo -> Vengeance. In fleet you have tacklers. You need to use the right tool for the right job. Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution. David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down. Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol.
The good old "everything happens for a reason", "everything was designed for a purpose" argument.
No, not everything happens for a reason. Maybe the devs had a purpose in mind when they designed these two ships, but just because they had been designed for a reason doesn't mean they were well-designed.
These "tools" may have been designed with some purpose in mind, but they are poorly designed tools, bent and broken and inferior in their function to alternatives due to the one medium slot. |

IceBergSlim
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
David Clausewitz wrote:IceBergSlim wrote:David Clausewitz wrote:Roderick Tazinas wrote:Solo -> Vengeance. In fleet you have tacklers. You need to use the right tool for the right job. Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution. David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down. Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol. The good old "everything happens for a reason", "everything was designed for a purpose" argument. No, these ships were badly designed with one medium slot and need to be fixed if they want to be remotely usable in solo/small group pvp work.
David, quite simply, you are wrong. Several people have posted in a polite manner regarding your semi-rant, myself included. There is no need to be terse. Obviously you won't be swayed, which is of course your perogative. I just cannot see you getting a bandwagon of agreement behind you. Maybe I'm wrong, and if you feel SO strongly, contact the dev's and ask them for their justification of those ships with one mid slot. Good luck with that, lol.
|

David Clausewitz
The Spawning Pool Team Liquid
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:24:00 -
[15] - Quote
IceBergSlim wrote:David Clausewitz wrote:IceBergSlim wrote:David Clausewitz wrote:Roderick Tazinas wrote:Solo -> Vengeance. In fleet you have tacklers. You need to use the right tool for the right job. Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution. David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down. Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol. The good old "everything happens for a reason", "everything was designed for a purpose" argument. No, these ships were badly designed with one medium slot and need to be fixed if they want to be remotely usable in solo/small group pvp work. David, quite simply, you are wrong. Several people have posted in a polite manner regarding your semi-rant, myself included. There is no need to be terse. Obviously you won't be swayed, which is of course your perogative. I just cannot see you getting a bandwagon of agreement behind you. Maybe I'm wrong, and if you feel SO strongly, contact the dev's and ask them for their justification of those ships with one mid slot. Good luck with that, lol.
So that was just a combination of ad hominem and straw man and it completely ignored my legitimate concerns that you either failed to comprehend as a valid response to your argument or just refused to acknowledge as legitimate concerns (which they are).
Quite simply, no you're wrong. Small one-medium ships do not function in this game when you only have two of them, and every other small ship is a better alternative. |

Ines Tegator
Project ELT
33
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:29:00 -
[16] - Quote
Their "role", as it functions now and regardless of the dev's intentions, is to sit in the hangar. Or be used in PVE only.
If the problem is slot layout, just increase the base armor HP of the coercer and move a low to medium. Same functionality (for an amarr ship), and the hull is now usable. Retribution has been discussed elsewhere, but suffice to say, it can afford to lose the utility high. |

Tarunik Raqalth'Qui
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
5
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
The problem with one-med-slot wonders in PvP combat:
- FCs will laugh you out of their fleet if you don't have a point or scram fitted.
- FCs in frigate gangs will also laugh you out of their fleet if you don't have some sort of propulsion module fitted (because you then lose any ability to control range).
Apparently the intent of the Retri or Coercer was to fit a point or scram and just use crystal swaps to counter any opponent trying to pull away. However, this doesn't deal with the problem of speedy, afterburning frigates getting deep under your guns and out-tracking you into oblivion. (A 125mm Gatling AutoCannon II has a base tracking of 0.417 rad/s and a Light Electron Blaster II has a base tracking of 0.438 rad/s, which is a not-exactly-insignificant edge over the 0.308 rad/s base tracking of a Gatling Pulse Laser II especially considering the fact that these ships are unlikely to be fitting high tracking weapons, although the Coercer's 10%/level tracking bonus makes this less problematic.)
As a result, even if you have a scram to shut down MWDs, you are not going to be able to stop AB or dualprop frigates from getting in under your guns, and you will also be unable to kite drones yourself or get in under the guns of larger ships with propmods fitted.
Never mind that the Jag has Minmatar T2 resists AND the speed needed to out-track you (and often fits 125mm/150mm guns due to the fact the only AF with less PG is the Ishkur)...can you see a Holder's bad day in the making? |

Captain Nares
O3 Corporation
9
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 20:06:00 -
[18] - Quote
One-med ships are OK. They aren't designed for tackling. |

Takeshi Yamato
ALA Biomedical
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 20:18:00 -
[19] - Quote
The Coercer is kind of okay. You don't expect Destroyers to tackle stuff, but just to kill frigates quickly from range and the Coercer does that well.
The Retribution does roughly half the dps of the Coercer now. At the same ranges, with much better tracking. There is no point to the Retribution. A second mid is WAY more useful than a fifth low slot. It either needs to do a LOT more dps to be worthwhile flying or just get that second mid slot.
"do a LOT more dps" as in: +1 turret, 10% damage bonus instead of 5%, extra grid and especially cpu (so it can actually fit multiple heatsinks and make good use of its low slots). With those bonuses it would just about match a Coercer in dps, and trade tracking for durability and low signature. |

Sevgei Ertekin
Comin' in Hot
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 21:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
One medium slot is just dumb. Anyone arguing otherwise, is too. |

Norris Packard
Wings of Redemption Black Flag Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 21:48:00 -
[21] - Quote
Even with the changes they made to destroyers this last update I don't think they are going to make destroyers that useful for most situations and it might be worth looking at giving all of the destroyers another slot to make them a little more powerful.
The Retribution, and for that matter all AFs, needs to be looked at closely. For one they have not yet given the AFs their 4th bonus that they should have been given ages ago. But with the Retribution it is worse off than most being stuck with that lack of a second med slot and that should be addressed. A 4H/2M/5L slot layout would be a great improvement and still give the ship a unique slot layout and with a decent 4th bonus could be made flyable.
I use my Retribution to build up Standings when forced to run lv.1s and lv.2s for agents and that is about it, would like to be able to dust it off for pvp at some point. |

Takeshi Yamato
ALA Biomedical
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 21:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
Norris Packard wrote:The Retribution, and for that matter all AFs, needs to be looked at closely. For one they have not yet given the AFs their 4th bonus that they should have been given ages ago. But with the Retribution it is worse off than most being stuck with that lack of a second med slot and that should be addressed. A 4H/2M/5L slot layout would be a great improvement and still give the ship a unique slot layout and with a decent 4th bonus could be made flyable.
Would you fly a Retri in gangs if it did 1.5x times its current dps? That would be 275 dps at 22km with Scorch in a damage and range oriented fit. |

Kesshisan
68
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 22:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
This just in:
Some ships are better for PvP than other ships. . |

Delphineas Fumimasa
The Rising Stars Academy
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 22:36:00 -
[24] - Quote
Sevgei Ertekin wrote:One medium slot is just dumb. Anyone arguing otherwise, is too.
Anyone arguing to buff ships with one medium slot while ignoring Cormorants one low is stupid.
|

Norris Packard
Wings of Redemption Black Flag Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 22:39:00 -
[25] - Quote
Takeshi Yamato wrote:Norris Packard wrote:The Retribution, and for that matter all AFs, needs to be looked at closely. For one they have not yet given the AFs their 4th bonus that they should have been given ages ago. But with the Retribution it is worse off than most being stuck with that lack of a second med slot and that should be addressed. A 4H/2M/5L slot layout would be a great improvement and still give the ship a unique slot layout and with a decent 4th bonus could be made flyable. Would you fly a Retri in gangs if it did 1.5x times its current dps? That would be 275 dps at 22km with Scorch in a damage and range oriented fit.
I still personally cannot justify it over almost any of the other ship that I can fly even if it did receive that damage boost. I normally do not fly in larger frig gangs where the they would need to have a frig with the heavy firepower and most gangs that I fly in use our frigate hulls for scouting and pointing. Without that ability any other frig hull becomes a better choice. Alternatively I can fly a shield buffer Omen and get more firepower out of it (but lose the good tracking) at that range with similar speeds (still takes a hit on agility) and have that needed point on the Omen.
I also do a great deal of solo work and not having that second mid slot even if they boosted damage makes this ship a non-viable alternative to any other frigate out there.
The one success that I did have in a Retribution solo was kinda on accident when I was attacked by a group of 4 frigates they having the numbers thought that I, a non-pvp ship, would be easy pickings. I was able to kill two of them before they even got into my armor and the other two bailed out (would have been really nice to have had that 2nd med slot right about then...). |

Maritza Cruz
Kings of Kill EVE Animal Control
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 22:58:00 -
[26] - Quote
Itworksfine
few from yesterday.
just have to know how to fly it.
|

Drazzz
Unknown Mass Imperium Honorius
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 00:47:00 -
[27] - Quote
Delphineas Fumimasa wrote:Sevgei Ertekin wrote:One medium slot is just dumb. Anyone arguing otherwise, is too. Anyone arguing to buff ships with one medium slot while ignoring Cormorants one low is stupid.
I seem to be missing the issue with the Cormorant? It's a Caldari ship. Caldari use shields. Shields mods go in mid slots. Where is the issue? I agree with the OP. These 2 ships need a second mid slot. I don't care what other ship uses the same layout. If every other ship in the game can use a point and a prop mod it just seems balanced IMO. |

Songbird
39
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 01:48:00 -
[28] - Quote
Sevgei Ertekin wrote:One medium slot is just dumb. Anyone arguing otherwise, is too.
Sevgei said it best. |

Tamiya Sarossa
Hedion University Amarr Empire
111
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 02:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
If the coercer had two midslots, it wouldn't be nearly as hilarious when you killed someone with one anymore. Don't nerf humor in my EVE! |

Khrage
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 21:01:00 -
[30] - Quote
stop asking. get a ceptor pilot to fly with you. the coecer and retri are great for pve and work fine in small hull sized fleets as gank. |

David Clausewitz
The Spawning Pool Team Liquid
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 21:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
Khrage wrote:stop asking. get a ceptor pilot to fly with you. the coecer and retri are great for pve and work fine in small hull sized fleets as gank.
Posts like this make me wish there was a dislike button. |

Klown Walk
striving for excellence.
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 21:15:00 -
[32] - Quote
They can still work with max dps, plenty of people thinks you have a point and don-¦t bother to warp off. |

David Clausewitz
The Spawning Pool Team Liquid
11
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 21:17:00 -
[33] - Quote
Klown Walk wrote:They can still work with max dps, plenty of people thinks you have a point and don-¦t bother to warp off.
Minority |

Opertone
Signal 7
29
|
Posted - 2011.12.03 21:24:00 -
[34] - Quote
Yes, of course. One med slot is hard to live with.
In fact this ship has tactical advantage - very strong tank. In a fleet of cruisers a retribution may look odd and draw enemy fire, which will save time. Retribution can be very strong if enemy goes for smallest by mistake. I.e. bait for the unaware.
Coercer, what do you not like? It is not meant to tackle, not meant to tank. Its tracking is abnormal, literally ignites all enemy frigates (all except stealth bombers). If enemy pilot is stupid enough to go under the guns of a destroyer, he goes belly up. Else, destroyers keep enemy tacklers, ceptors and drones away. Nothing to complain about.
|

Khrage
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 00:04:00 -
[35] - Quote
David Clausewitz wrote: Posts like this make me wish there was a dislike button.
from reading your other responses you would dislike everything that gives a reason for not adding the 2nd mid slots.
simply you don't need 2 mid slots for everything. yes solo pvp is very hard without both a point and prop, but the ships are still balanced. they excel in any situation where they don't need the point. especially when it comes to the archetype of amarr of being simple gank and tank, that's what the coercer and retri do best. and in any fleet situation when you aren't tackle and it is your job to do nothing but melt hulls, everyone would trade mid slots for low slots, no matter what the ship. in fact now that i think about it, i wouldn't mind MORE ships to have just one mid slot to pack on more lows. they are dps ships, not tackle ships. that is what they are made for.
and +1 to Opertone
Opertone wrote: Yes, of course. One med slot is hard to live with.
In fact this ship has tactical advantage - very strong tank. In a fleet of cruisers a retribution may look odd and draw enemy fire, which will save time. Retribution can be very strong if enemy goes for smallest by mistake. I.e. bait for the unaware.
Coercer, what do you not like? It is not meant to tackle, not meant to tank. Its tracking is abnormal, literally ignites all enemy frigates (all except stealth bombers). If enemy pilot is stupid enough to go under the guns of a destroyer, he goes belly up. Else, destroyers keep enemy tacklers, ceptors and drones away. Nothing to complain about. |

Garr Earthbender
Quantum Cats Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 00:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
You could almost say that 1 mid slot ships are fun to play with because they have only 1 mid slot. I get that having a point is almost always mandatory. Running in a frig fleet though? Nah. Running in nano fleet where you're just there for close range frig protection? Nah.
Sitting on the warp in of a FW plex with a arty trasher? NAH!!! |

Ruah Piskonit
PIE Inc.
61
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 01:22:00 -
[37] - Quote
The retribution more then makes up for its lack of mids with very good dps at very good range and with a good tank. Its got lots of lows, lots of guns, a utility high. People who want to change the ship should just get a different ship imo - the retri and the coer do their jobs as fleet fire support very well.
I frankly don't understand why people want to standardize. If the retri got 2 mids, then it will still not be enough. |

Firestorm Delta
Wiki Industrialists Wiki Conglomerates
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 04:19:00 -
[38] - Quote
I can understand the people who want that second mid slot, I can also understand people who say the cormorant should get an extra low. I've flown every destroyer but the thrasher at some point in time, and having just one slot in an area bothers me to no end. But I won't argue with CCP to change it because as said ships are each designed with a purpose. If you can't fit a point and a prop mod then obviously soloing pvp isn't that ships purpose. Not all ships work good solo, if you can make them work solo then good for you, but if you can't then get a group.
Its not uncommon in games that involve space combat of some kind to have ships that are used for the sole purpose of screening larger ships. In fact most games that involve any form of strategy tend to have some kind of unit that does this. What do you know, the destroyer looks to be a perfect match for this.
Also there is one problem with giving the destroyers any more slots, then we start having too many slots to go around, and we end up with either op destroyers, or they all end up looking the same. If the races become cookie cutters of each other then whats the point of having different races?
Well that rant went a bit longer then I planned on. Either way take my words with a grain of salt as you probably know more about pvp then I do. |

Forum Chav
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 10:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
"...So that was just a combination of ad hominem and straw man and it completely ignored my legitimate concerns that you either failed to comprehend as a valid response to your argument or just refused to acknowledge as legitimate concerns (which they are). ..."
Lmao. You used to work for the Reagan Administration, yeah? |

Ancy Denaries
Frontier Venture
62
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 10:23:00 -
[40] - Quote
Even before the buff, I had tons of fun blowing frigs to pieces in FW fleets with my Coercer. It's not a solo boat, and if you have to solo, make sure you kill stuff before it has a chance to warp off. :P |

Lunkwill Khashour
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 12:03:00 -
[41] - Quote
IMHO, the coercer is fine with 1 med slot. The cormorant has 1 low and these limitations force the destroyers in specific roles. Moreover, the coercer has enough turrets to kill most nasty frigs before they realise they need to get out.
The assault frigates however, are meant as a more general purpose ship. There isn't an AF with 1 low, instead the harpy and hawk both have the same slot layout, whereas for the other races, the AF's have different slot layouts. The 1 mid of the retribution severly limits the general frig tendency the other AF's have. But this should be looked ad together with the AF 4th bonus/reimagining thing that needs to happen.
TL,DR: - coercer is fine, dps tackle best tackle - retri isn't fine, but AF needs to be looked at anyways |

Zyella Stormborn
Vanguard Systems.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 01:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
IceBergSlim wrote:David Clausewitz wrote:Roderick Tazinas wrote:Solo -> Vengeance. In fleet you have tacklers. You need to use the right tool for the right job. Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution. David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down. Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol.
And I may be mistaken, but isnt the Coercer the best of the Destroyers on dps and ehp while staying cap stable? If that is the case, then their role is rather straight forward... pew pew. :) If it is not the case... well *cough* maybe a change could be looked at. |

Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
308
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 02:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
Have solo killed in a Retribution crew checking in. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ Get Out, Nasty Face ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
Signature edited. Navigator. |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
35
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 17:56:00 -
[44] - Quote
The 1-mid ship. Designed to sacrifice tackle in favour of doing much higher DPS. Great concept, IMHO.
... The rather large problem with this being that the other assault frigates and destroyers can do as much, if not more DPS and can still mount both mobility and tackle.
To put this about as bluntly as I can: if a ship is going to be a one-trick pony, it should be better at that trick than the others. |

Takeshi Yamato
ALA Biomedical
24
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 17:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Have solo killed in a Retribution crew checking in.
What did you kill? A cruiser without propulsion mod? A noob in a T1 frigate? A drunken ceptor pilot? 
Please tell.
|

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
35
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 18:01:00 -
[46] - Quote
Have warped off laughing from a solo Coercer crew checking in. |

Worpout
Unforeseen Consequences.
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 19:22:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kite no tank it like a boss |

Khrage
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 19:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
Duchess Starbuckington wrote:The 1-mid ship. Designed to sacrifice tackle in favour of doing much higher DPS. Great concept, IMHO.
... The rather large problem with this being that the other assault frigates and destroyers can do as much, if not more DPS and can still mount both mobility and tackle.
To put this about as bluntly as I can: if a ship is going to be a one-trick pony, it should be better at that trick than the others.
+1 |

Grog Drinker
The Tuskers
5
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 20:11:00 -
[49] - Quote
The bigger problem is the lack of usable laser boats below the BC size in general. For a pilot wanting to fly solo amarr boats you can use a laser punisher but the jump between that and a harbinger is pretty dismal. The only worthwhile step up from a punisher is the crusader or slicer. The retribution and coercer are unusable due to the lack of mids. The omen is worthless because of its power grid and cpu.
The punisher, maller, and prophecy also generally work better with AC's anyway.
Give the retribution and coercer another mid each and we will see many more small laser boats in pvp.
Also if your gonna fly internet spaceships they damn well better be shooting flashy lasers... |

Tarunik Raqalth'Qui
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 20:21:00 -
[50] - Quote
Grog Drinker wrote:The bigger problem is the lack of usable laser boats below the BC size in general. For a pilot wanting to fly solo amarr boats you can use a laser punisher but the jump between that and a harbinger is pretty dismal. The only worthwhile step up from a punisher is the crusader or slicer. The retribution and coercer are unusable due to the lack of mids. The omen is worthless because of its power grid and cpu.
The punisher, maller, and prophecy also generally work better with AC's anyway.
Give the retribution and coercer another mid each and we will see many more small laser boats in pvp.
Also if your gonna fly internet spaceships they damn well better be shooting flashy lasers... Yes. The Slicer is pricey, and so is the Navy Omen, and those are the only usable sub-BC solo laser boats Amarr gets, unless you count "requires flying on a knife edge" as usable (aka the 'Sader). And don't even get me started about the Zealot...it simply isn't funny what a pack o' frigs can do to that ship. |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
36
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 20:26:00 -
[51] - Quote
Yeah that is a depressingly short list.
Quote:it simply isn't funny what a pack o' frigs can do to that ship. A valid point, or it would be if the Zealot wasn't a gang ship rather than solo (a role in which it is superb)
There's also the Phantasm, but not sure if that really counts... |

carbomb
Super Team Munkey
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 21:56:00 -
[52] - Quote
I agree that having 1 mid slot is a bit of a hindrance, however, the ships are very usable without that 2nd mid. I love flying the coercer solo. It is great at killing over confident dramiel pilots They brawl into a fight with both feet with the notion that they can just burn away or warp off if things dont go to plan. Unfortunately for them by the time they realise things are turning sour its too late 
Not had too many fights in the retri. Its a good mix of tank/dps tho.
|

Tarunik Raqalth'Qui
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 22:00:00 -
[53] - Quote
Duchess Starbuckington wrote:Yeah that is a depressingly short list. Quote:it simply isn't funny what a pack o' frigs can do to that ship. A valid point, or it would be if the Zealot wasn't a gang ship rather than solo (a role in which it is superb) There's also the Phantasm, but not sure if that really counts... I agree that the Zealot is a fantastic gang ship. Just don't ever try to fly one solo, or else I'll have to come hunt you down and blow you to bits for it. |

Zyella Stormborn
Vanguard Systems.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.06 22:17:00 -
[54] - Quote
Grog Drinker wrote:The bigger problem is the lack of usable laser boats below the BC size in general. For a pilot wanting to fly solo amarr boats you can use a laser punisher but the jump between that and a harbinger is pretty dismal. The only worthwhile step up from a punisher is the crusader or slicer. The retribution and coercer are unusable due to the lack of mids. The omen is worthless because of its power grid and cpu.
The punisher, maller, and prophecy also generally work better with AC's anyway.
Give the retribution and coercer another mid each and we will see many more small laser boats in pvp.
Also if your gonna fly internet spaceships they damn well better be shooting flashy lasers...
+1  |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
13
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 08:10:00 -
[55] - Quote
Retri is one of the best L2 Frigats you can get :). Most times faster then any cruiser and much more fun to fly.
If you use the util high for a probe launcher the Retri is great for up to 3/10 deadspace which mostly contain frig size enemys.
Hell, it is even great at 00 belt rating in Providence.
And it does a very good job as sniper(50+km)/DPS(up to 288) platform in gangs. Not both at the same time ;).
PS: and btw. NOT every ship in EVE must be PvP able! Just learn to except, that some are made for PvE ;). Not? Well, why the hell aren't mining barks able to fit propper tanks and ... see my sig damit! Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
37
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 13:25:00 -
[56] - Quote
Quote:And it does a very good job as sniper(50+km)/DPS(up to 288) platform in gangs. Not both at the same time ;).
Frigate sized sniper is not a role.
Quote:PS: and btw. NOT every ship in EVE must be PvP able! Just learn to except, that some are made for PvE ;). Correct, some ships are not intended for PVP. These include mining barges and, to some extent, Marauders. This category does not however include assault frigates, which are PVP ships, and if one underperforms in that role there is a problem.
And by the way, speaking of roles that don't exist: PVE AF is one of them. Mission running AFs are a gimmick, at best, and not even remotely worth using compared to a proper PVE ship.
Oh and by the way, if your sig is serious, you're an idiot. (Yeah the rest of your post was dumb enough that I honestly can't tell if you actually meant it) |

Aine Morchet
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 13:41:00 -
[57] - Quote
I tried to find videos of Coercer PvP.
Every single one is a Coercer being killed by the filmer. There is not a single PvP vid where a Coercer actually kills something.
'sup 1 med slot. |

Niko Takahashi
United Starbase Systems
14
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 13:43:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ines Tegator wrote:There is no reason for a pvp ship to ever have only 1 midslot. If you don't have a point, most FC's will laugh you out of their fleet. Yes there are ways around it, but realistically all it does is gimp that ship in comparison to other hulls.
Then I Will laugh at the FC who does that there are several ships who work better as a DPS platform and there are ships that tackle. to have a point on each ship in a fleet is a waste of Midslot.
30 to 40 % of fleet members should fit points of some kind after that you should have EW of Prop mod.
Situation changes even more if you have Interdictors and Heavy Interdictors then even less normal points is needed
|

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
37
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 13:49:00 -
[59] - Quote
Quote:to have a point on each ship in a fleet is a waste of Midslot.
No, to have a frigate without a point is a waste of a ship. (With the obvious exception of the Griffin/Kitsune)
If you're in a frigate, and you don't have a point, frankly you need a damn good reason - and the Retribution doesn't have one. The DPS it puts out isn't that impressive compared to other AFs. |

Grog Drinker
The Tuskers
9
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 14:00:00 -
[60] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:PS: and btw. NOT every ship in EVE must be PvP able! Just learn to except, that some are made for PvE ;). Not? Well, why the hell aren't mining barks able to fit propper tanks and ... see my sig damit!
Mining barges are industrial ships.... AF's and destroyers are indeed designed for pvp. Name one other AF that isn't regularly seen in PVP... |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
37
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 14:02:00 -
[61] - Quote
The Enyo? ... Which is still better than the Retribution. |

Grog Drinker
The Tuskers
9
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 14:08:00 -
[62] - Quote
Duchess Starbuckington wrote:The Enyo? ... Which is still better than the Retribution.
I've seen a bunch of enyos around recently.... seems someone decided to buff them and make them viable ships... |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
38
|
Posted - 2011.12.07 14:09:00 -
[63] - Quote
They were always workable, just not quite as good all-round as the Ishkur. But yeah the hybrid buff will have helped a lot there. |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
40
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 13:33:00 -
[64] - Quote
Bumpage, fix the 1-mid lolships please. |

Khrage
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 15:27:00 -
[65] - Quote
Duchess Starbuckington wrote:2 - Buff the DPS output, so it actually does enough to be worth the lack of tackle.
this. |

Takeshi Yamato
ALA Biomedical
29
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 15:35:00 -
[66] - Quote
Duchess Starbuckington wrote:Bumpage, fix the 1-mid lolships please.
In the case of the Retribution, the way I see it this is doable in 2 ways: 1 - Give it a mid. Obvious really Or 2 - Buff the DPS output, so it actually does enough to be worth the lack of tackle.
Well put.
|

Ruah Piskonit
PIE Inc.
67
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 22:39:00 -
[67] - Quote
Duchess Starbuckington wrote:Quote:to have a point on each ship in a fleet is a waste of Midslot. No, to have a frigate without a point is a waste of a ship. (With the obvious exception of the Griffin/Kitsune) If you're in a frigate, and you don't have a point, frankly you need a damn good reason - and the Retribution doesn't have one. The DPS it puts out isn't that impressive compared to other AFs.
Its not just the dps, its that dps at 20km. . .and with a beefy tank.
Retri is fine, coer is fine too.
although yes, the 4th bonus should be dps |

Bamfordi
Global Defence Initiative P I R A T E S
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 23:31:00 -
[68] - Quote
Eve is an mmo and working in a fleet is what most if not all pvp ships are driven toward. And the arguement about an FC 'laughing you out of fleet' when you have no point is nonesense. Since all (with the exception of this other ships generally fit points and in fleet fight's you're either facing a worse, generally smaller, fleet than you or you're running away. Only an idiot would turn away this nice little ship.
If you really want to solo get a slicer, same skills needed not that much more expensive, and has midslots. |

Pryvate Pile
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.09 23:35:00 -
[69] - Quote
Bamfordi wrote:Amarr is a fleet race and working in a fleet is what most if not all amarr pvp ships are driven toward.
Fixed that for you. |

Zircon Dasher
Zirconia Trade Group
33
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 00:11:00 -
[70] - Quote
Since the complaint is that all other ships except coercer and retri can fit a prop mod and ewar, maybe we should just nerf some other ships so that they wont be lonely.
I vote the Abby, Mach, Cane, Pest need to have 1 mid slot each. Give them 1 low slot to compensate.  |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
41
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 01:47:00 -
[71] - Quote
Quote:Its not just the dps, its that dps at 20km. . .and with a beefy tank.
So let's get this straight, according to you, the Retribution's role is to... do utterly mediocre damage at 20km range. Right. I should probably point out here as you seem a bit clueless: the Retribution's DPS is only even competitive at point blank range, once you start moving out further it only gets worse.
Oh and to the argument about the tank:
Ok, here I am, being attacked by a number of frigates. Who do I target? - The Enyos or whatever, that are currently hitting very hard and holding me in place - The interceptors, who are hitting less hard but have lower tank and are instrumental in holding me in place - The EWAR frigates, which are screwing with me in too many ways to count - ... The Retribution, sitting around at 20km doing meh damage with a lot of EHP and doing nothing at all to stop me escaping.
It could be argued that the Retribution is the tankiest AF not by virtue of EHP, but by not being worth shooting at in the first place.
Quote:Retri is fine, coer is fine too. And your supporting evidence for this is - where?
Quote:Only an idiot would turn away this nice little ship. No, only an idiot who's utterly pidgeon-holed themselves into laser frigates (or really, really doesn't care about their performance) would fly it.
Let me put it this way:
Hi there. I'm a Wolf. I'd also like you to meet my friends: Enyo, Taranis, Ishkur, Comet and Harpy. What do we have in common? We all do better DPS than the Retribution, and can still mount tackle. My friends Vengeance, Hawk and Jaguar don't do quite as much paper DPS but are a hell of a lot better at applying it. And can all mount tackle.
When all these ships exist that can do the same thing better and more (and don't take more than what, 2 weeks tops to cross train for?) then why fly a retri?
Another big question: if a given pilot is so heavily skilled into Amarr frigates at the expense of others, then why put them in a Retribution when they could be so much more useful in an interceptor or sentinel? It'd free up another pilot in the gang to fly a better DPS ship (see list above ^) for starters. |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
42
|
Posted - 2011.12.11 00:49:00 -
[72] - Quote
Retribution still sucks. Bump. |

m0cking bird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
37
|
Posted - 2011.12.11 01:13:00 -
[73] - Quote
Ruah Piskonit wrote:Duchess Starbuckington wrote:Quote:to have a point on each ship in a fleet is a waste of Midslot. No, to have a frigate without a point is a waste of a ship. (With the obvious exception of the Griffin/Kitsune) If you're in a frigate, and you don't have a point, frankly you need a damn good reason - and the Retribution doesn't have one. The DPS it puts out isn't that impressive compared to other AFs. Its not just the dps, its that dps at 20km. . .and with a beefy tank. Retri is fine, coer is fine too. although yes, the 4th bonus should be dps
Agreed. Coercer even more so now.
|

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
46
|
Posted - 2011.12.11 20:48:00 -
[74] - Quote
Hmm, just checked and the Retri is still broken. Odd. |

Dorian Tormak
P0ON
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.11 21:32:00 -
[75] - Quote
I agree with Mr. Starbucks, the Retribution is a piece of ****.
You can use it, and do some cool things with it, but it's still gonna be a piece of ****...
... Unless it gets a second mid-slot.
Do that, and it will be very competitive, I'd bet. I can picture lots of Afterburner-fit Wolfs Jaguars and Ishkurs getting smashed apart by long range MWD-fit Retris.
Some day, some how, some way, CCP needs to slap a second mid-slot onto this ship. Plain and simple. ...."and I've been fighting back ever since...." |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
46
|
Posted - 2011.12.11 22:01:00 -
[76] - Quote
Quote:Some day, some how, some way, CCP needs to slap a second mid-slot onto this ship. Plain and simple. That or give it the DPS buff it needs to be worth of the title "frigate damage dealer", but I'd certainly prefer the second mid. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |