|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
AlexKent
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 12:19:13 -
[1] - Quote
Entosis Link should only fit to Bcruiser/Bship and above to prevent abuse. It will also give people a reason to fly these over cruiser and frigate hulls.
P.S.
RIP capital warfare, not sure if a bad or good thing.
|
AlexKent
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
9
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 15:15:05 -
[2] - Quote
Cr Turist wrote:AlexKent wrote:Hear that boys?
It's the titan prices falling in a cascade of delicious NCdot tears.
Also, RIP renter empire, you might wanna merge NA in your alliance so you will be able to protect their space. So much for being elite. umm this effects you just as much if not more than us m8.
True that, but only if we survive MOA's invasion first!
We will survive, worst case scenario we have plenty of npc space in our regions to support us all, as agent missions are infinite and do not require any sort of mind-numbing mechanics to make living there easy. Hell, we might even move to jita for all I care.
On a serious note, I don't find the changes that bad considering what CCP has come up with through the years. Titans were already nerfed into the ground same as supers.
The major flaw of the system originates from CCP's assumption that Sov is currently worth having. It's not. People advocating easy conquering of space have never had any in the first place. They don't know that nullsec ratting makes as much isk/hr as mission running in highsec, they don't know how hard it is to move a freighter to install an ihub upgrade or the pain to keep towers and jump bridges fueled and the list goes on.
Sov needs to be vulnerable to small gangs, but to organized people not just any newbie in a 10m ship with an 80m module stacked on top.
|
AlexKent
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 15:41:02 -
[3] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:No longer can the CFC impose it's will with 1,000 megathrons, nor PL, strike fear into a sov holders heart with its super caps. No, now we must run around in interceptors and cruisers and engage in fights with similar ships in honorable brawl in some artificial node after we missed catching that last interceptor because CCP cares not about the relative advantages of living in the UK with a low ping vs being on the wrong side of the planet on ancient copper wires. We then dismount from our puny steeds after four hours of toil fending off the heathens looking for giggles, good fights and tears and mount up our trusty dusty mining ships to maintain the ancient honourable industry index which actually only measure rocks shot with a mining laser. So maybe Goons have too much Sov to effectively hold at the moment and need to downscale?
Maybe we should drop all of it and move near your highsec mission hub. That would be fun. |
AlexKent
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 09:50:05 -
[4] - Quote
In its current form I doubt there are many small entities looking at capturing and holding sov outside of griefing purpose. Although that will always play a major part in eve, the end-goal should be to make people WANT to live in null, build a home there, defend it and growing as an organization (not necessary in numbers). Renters who just want to PVE will feel unsafe, NPC null residents will never consider capturing systems to actually live in, the skilled corps will prefer the wormholes or lowsec, the major coalitions will abandon the useless space and the problem of empty regions will remain untouched. Why? Because so many systems are not worth owning and there is no possibility to make them any better.
I strongly think a basic concept of phase 3 (giving value to nullsec) should be formulated (not implemented) before we can analyse the current proposed changes. Post a thread with a few hints and let people's ideas flow.
Most of nullsec in its current form is not worth defending. I understand the current changes need to come before a potential null buff, but some hints about the future should be posted for consideration. This would give us a bigger picture of where the game is heading.
It does not need to be detailed and specific, just a few guidelines and the possibility to make our voices heard. It would calm the spirits and allow us to asses the full future of a nullsec scenery.
The same for a potential supercap re-balancing or re-purposing. All we need is a thread from a dev confirming they are looking to implement changes and are looking for feedback.
|
|
|
|