| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
KelSaor
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
0
   |
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:13:11 -
[1] - Quote
I am seeing very little reason why anyone would want to hold 0.0 sov except for the moon income. Your system makes 0.0 the riskiest place to live (which I agree it should be) but doesnt offer anything over just mission running in highsec and fighting in lowsec.
The 4 hour timer is always a bad mechanic, no in fact its terrible. Sorry guys, only one tz gets to play 0.0, the rest of you just go back to ratting or on a pointless roam.
Bye bye supers, no point to them now.
...and we all move to NPC space. |
KelSaor
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:33:19 -
[2] - Quote
KC Kamikaze wrote:KelSaor wrote:I am seeing very little reason why anyone would want to hold 0.0 sov except for the moon income. Your system makes 0.0 the riskiest place to live (which I agree it should be) but doesnt offer anything over just mission running in highsec and fighting in lowsec.
The 4 hour timer is always a bad mechanic, no in fact its terrible. Sorry guys, only one tz gets to play 0.0, the rest of you just go back to ratting or on a pointless roam.
Bye bye supers, no point to them now.
...and we all move to NPC space. Actually wormholes are the riskiest place to live. The 4 hour timer is fine. It's the reverse of no timer. It means you only get attacked at your peak time. Thats fantastic in my opinion. That way the aggressing force can't use your lack of activity in a particular timezone to their advantage. In wspace we don't get that luxury. Somone attacks you and to maintain hole control you are in the game for 12 hours a day fighting to keep your **** after working for 8 hours. The 4 hour window will lower the divorce rate amongst eve players.
I'll concede on WH having more risk, but sorry still disagree about the timer and 0.0 being worth it.
When you are flying with an alliance that has 1000s of pilots, 1 TZ will be on constant guard for sov fights, the other 2 wont. As I suspect my alliance/allies will pick US tz I doubt I'll even see much sov action. |
KelSaor
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:38:41 -
[3] - Quote
d0cTeR9 wrote:#1 I hope this is a VERY basic idea going around, because it's extremely poorly thoughout.
#2 Why bother keeping space?
#3 Another slap to supercarriers... last thing to do was structure fighter bomber bashing or repping, gone!
#4 Here comes fleet of cov-ops going around trolling stations...
Well that was dissapointing...
Can my supers dock now? At least i can station-spin them... Maybe use their fitting service since station services are going to be near-perma disabled...
#1 its ccp........
#2 moon income, thats it
#3 Pretty much
#4 yup |
| |
|