| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
   |
Posted - 2015.03.05 10:21:30 -
[1] - Quote
Invulnerability of sov during all time but "prime time" is horrible idea.
It forces every group in the game to fight at a maximum disadvantage. And it makes every alliance to consolidate into a particular timezone. So at last we will get "time zone map of nullsec". I can hear the complaints of every russian as they discover that their offensive timers are always at 3am...
I think sov must be vulnerable not in "prime time" too. But not in "prime time" there should be x3 multiplier for capture time.
|
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 11:59:41 -
[2] - Quote
Looking at the proposed dynamic of structure destruction CCP should think about decreasing volume of iHUB and iHUB upgrades. I suppose it will be cargo capacity of Iteron Mark V. |
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 12:22:23 -
[3] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:
No.
Look for a WH and then make freighter transport ops.
Done that over 1000 times. So what? Don`t you see the difference betwen dynamics of structure destruction today and after patch? Or you prefer to add some WH spawn intensity?
Dark Spite wrote:Some things shouldnt be too easy, that is one of them. Plus you would be insane/too spacerich/dumb if you loaded an Iteron Mark V with something that valuable. You would probably die on the Jita 4-4 undock.
Didn't know that so stupid things still exist. |
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 12:27:08 -
[4] - Quote
Dark Spite wrote:
I take this to mean you would still have to shoot the structure after reinforcing it. Entosis link isnt a structure doomsday device.
Yes it is. Just look at the example.
Quote:
In our example case, let's say Flameburst Coalition manages to catch the majority of the Blackhawk fleet in some bubbles and decimates their force, allowing them to win the first capture event for the RIT station and the capture event for the RIT IHub. The IHub explodes, allowing anyone to place a new replacement hub.
|
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 13:16:37 -
[5] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Just make the Entosis Link a Command Link with all associated restrictions.
No more trollceptors. Got to use T3s for that.
I think battleship is fine candidate for this purpose. |
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 13:25:40 -
[6] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Why are people so scared of paper ships that cannot warp?
I'm not scared. It's just question of risk/reward. Where on one hand 750 kk for iHub and on the other 20kk for interceptor. |
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 13:47:02 -
[7] - Quote
afkalt wrote:Lavayar wrote:afkalt wrote:Why are people so scared of paper ships that cannot warp? Have you seen what ships like cerberus are capable of? These "trollceptors" are loot pinyatas, very little more. Assuming of course you live in your space.
Yes. My cerberus alt is ready for this.
In fact I'm just worrying that visual effect that shows which ship is applying Entosis Link is hard to notice in swarm of such bastards before it is to late. |
Lavayar
Russian SOBR
Dream Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 14:14:58 -
[8] - Quote
Chi'Nane T'Kal wrote:
So basically your answer to that 100M trollceptor is to bring a 200M+ cerberus ..unless of course, there are a few more names in local, which may or may not be a support fleet waiting for you just to do so, in which case you'll stay docked?
On second thought, make that a support fleet anywhere in range and a single additional pilot in local, to keep the point till his friends arrive.
In EvE it's more a matter of good manners to suppose a trap and outsmart your enemy.
|
| |
|