The new simpler system that everyone can understand and apparently automatically knows what they should be doing and when takes 20 pages to explain?

There are good ideas here and some bad ones.

Why make the T2 module 10 times better than the T1 module.
Surely this is the opposite of what your trying to achieve with tiericide.
Why would anyone use the T1?

I'm going to say I'm somewhat disappointed, but I shall return to comment after I go throw up.

Docking

A couple of points:

BAD
1) Been touched on a lot but needs to be re-iterated non-stop. Please give null-sec sov owners a better incentive to want null in the first place. The reduction in pos fuel is not even close to enough.
2) Too hard to get level 4/5 industry atm. Where as it is much easier to get level 5 military.
3) If you are not that worried about station services (any POS dweller has become used to that) then how does this motivate people to fight on any other time (beyond transfer one)?
4) clearly CCP wants to merry the benefits of PVE with benefits in PVP but in my opinion there are not enough. Why not give system more optional effects like in wh's with specific upgrade packages - the variety of fleet comps to suit system upgrades could make life very interesting?
5) Not sure how this deals with renting. If a renter now wants to revolt - only the distance from landlord determines that possibility? How will this effect a possible revolt? since he belongs to the alliance he can't. He has too quit first.
6) Giving the sov holder the ability to choose his TZ was meant to give an incentive and home advantage but doesn't it make it impossible as well for the attacker if it is in AUZ time zone for example?

NOT SURE
1) Did you intend to nerf Supers and Dreads? I don't see how they are used in sov change anymore and since they suck 'at pvp that is meant to be spread out'...This is a nail in the coffin for the Superclass. First they can't easily move, and now take away their purpose! Maybe that is the intent.
2) Is this not going to motivate the creation of super alliances? Since only members of the holding alliance can defend sov. Why does Mittens now not just order all his plebs to join the Goons? Is that the intent?

GOOD
1) The multiplier of levels to the sov transfer ease.
2) More can be a part of the process.
3) Removes the grind of structures.
4) Brings constellation back into game.
5) Allows for better planning by Alliance with new UI.
6) Love the freeport idea.
7) Love the fact you have the balls to actually tinker with this.

REQUEST
I would love to know how the CSM voted on this. in a democracy, knowing how people actually performed is more important then how often they smile or blog.

Porky

No they want 0.0 to be owned by people who actually want to fight, not carebears who hide behind blues while creating alts to shoot people who don't shoot back.

Bubbles shut off MWD's?

News to me.

Your gasp of game mechanics and meta is so great you too should work for ccp.

Why is no one else concerned that GM's are once again playing in and influencing sov warfare with hidden alts.

Cause that went so well before in BoB, didint it!

'Oi Fozzie im poor, spawn me an officer in this belt please'

'Oi Fozziee, Have a look on that ccp graph and tell me the best t3's to build over a 6 month period'

'Oi Fozzie, Develop me a sov system that breaks the current gameplay cause im too lazy to try to take sov and invest me time right now'

All they're doing is making it even more aids to take a system, and practically impossible to do anything outside of your own TZ.

All you need is a cloud of interceptors with the t2 (250km range one) loaded up with sebos and a mwd and orbit far enough away so you can't smartbomb the blob and keep traversal up. Get a few fleets of these (only need 30 or so duders in each), load in some benny hill music and glhf.

It's not so much you can't kill the interceptors, as much as killing a single fleet of 30 interceptors before 10-40 minutes is a pain in the ****. Now look at killing 10 fleets of them reinforcing all your **** in a region and this mechanic is insanely annoying and most of the targets will get reinforced anyway.

This strategy also favors the larger alliances in that the smaller ones won't be able to chase down the masses of intys the larger ones can throw at a region so I don't get why so many of these small alliances are looking forward to this thinking they will be able to hold space.

From the other devblog" We are well aware that Nullsec empires have mastered the strategy of weaponizing their opponentGÇÖs boredom" so now we'll give you a way to weaponize your opponent's frustration. This will lead to quicker burn out than blueballing.

My opinion that you are as clueless as current gm's was not only sincere but heartfelt too.

Sure, and they keep their sov by hiding behind bubbles, and instalock gatecamps thirty jumps away from where you want to take.
Nothing changed good game! , CCP are not stupid enough to fall for this, give them SOME respect. Possibly you would like a super jump fatigue temoval module on top?