EVE Search - Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30735	Posted - 2015.03.04 00:08:38 - [1] - Quote This is a great time to be a Goon. triple 8 for luck Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30735	Posted - 2015.03.04 00:31:23 - [2] - Quote The short contest duration, and the situation with the station. I am trying to figure this out and from what I can tell the best response with regards to the Halitosis link is... start subcap and capital halitosis links at the same time, so that the process starts with subcap links while capital links have time to cycle. My question is, can the subcap links be stopped once the capital links start their second cycle? Like, is this an effective way to make a handoff from subcap to cap links. I ask because the only problem with the capital link nerf is the run-up cycle, and after that it's what you want anyway. I haven't tried it yet, but I'm curious what kind of tank you can keep with two triage Archons keeping themselves capped up using injects (rather than passive). Are you sure it's as easy for attackers as you think? I see a new Halitosis brick tank Archon meta happening, possibly paired with a 750k EHP Damnation to run the initial subcap link. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30735	Posted - 2015.03.04 00:42:10 - [3] - Quote But then I recall what Sion wrote about social structures and I am Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30736	Posted - 2015.03.04 02:12:51 - [4] - Quote Is this not a huge buff to solo PVP. Now one dude with halitosis can pick all the fights they want Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30736	Posted - 2015.03.04 02:17:48 - [5] - Quote Dear CCP Fozzie, I suggest making the tosser module a default warpable item in overview like cynos. Can you also make the tosser module eject pods from their ship? Ship sov contests would be fun. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30736	Posted - 2015.03.04 02:38:42 - [6] - Quote Will the module make ships immobile as well, like the other modules it seems to behave like? Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30736	Posted - 2015.03.04 02:45:57 - [7] - Quote So the best way to take sov is by constellation-wide deployments. heh. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30737	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:03:27 - [8] - Quote Proton Stars wrote: Rain6637 wrote: So the best way to take sov is by constellation-wide deployments. heh. I thought one of the main premises was allowing sov to be local to a system? FC was the old hotness, now there will be a CC or Constellation Coordinator? Anyone would think they are trying to boost large alliance groups like goons Most of the discussion assumes there will be conflict at all. I'm pretty sure there will be NEPs or Non Entosis Pacts. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30737	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:07:51 - [9] - Quote A workaround for prime time would be a reorganization of coalitions into constellation-sized alliances. You would also have to make sure these constellation alliances have enough ship-power to ensure there will be enough entosis modules during fights. Just don't forget the talk about reorganization as a workaround to new sov mechanics. Play this out a year or two down the road and you'll have what, one station per constellation stocked with response ships and jump clones... and each character can potentially maintain response clones in ten constellations? Entosis skill has a nice synergy with this jump clone response strategy. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30738	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:24:13 - [10] - Quote Rowells wrote: Rain6637 wrote: Proton Stars wrote: Rain6637 wrote: So the best way to take sov is by constellation-wide deployments. heh. I thought one of the main premises was allowing sov to be local to a system? FC was the old hotness, now there will be a CC or Constellation Coordinator? Anyone would think they are trying to boost large alliance groups like goons Most of the discussion assumes there will be conflict at all. I'm pretty sure there will be NEPs or Non Entosis Pacts. That's why I'm worried about neutral Alts. What happens when an NPC corp character activates an entosis module? Can the station's control still drop? Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.

Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30740	Posted - 2015.03.04 06:32:53 - [11] - Quote A note about API notifications. With Neocom (iPhone) plugged into calendar, events such as timers are plotted on my phone's calendar automatically. This would be great for something like a station 'tosis timer, but the delay on API calls gets in the way of this being viable. Is it possible to make 'tosis timers send a burst of that API endpoint? Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30740	Posted - 2015.03.04 06:42:34 - [12] - Quote Please make this station alert sound a thing. Complete with flashing red lights in hangar and CQ. #allhandsondick Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30741	Posted - 2015.03.04 12:11:10 - [13] - Quote I didn't see any mention of whether 'tosis modules will make the ship immune to ewar. Otherwise I can jam myself with an alt to exit cycle and catch reps. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30741	Posted - 2015.03.04 12:14:41 - [14] - Quote Coolest Space wrote: Is it only me that felt that groups like reavers also kind of broke SOV when they could take SOV or at least disturb SOV with only 10 people in one system. And now you say 1 guy with a Entosis Link can disturb sov for a whole alliance. That only happened / happens when there's no one around to defend other than PVE farmers. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30741	Posted - 2015.03.04 12:39:12 - [15] - Quote Hey CCP, another reason to make 'tosis immobile is floating outside of lock range to break cycle. Cutting a Sensor Integrity warfare link could accomplish the same thing. You might need to change this to be range-based, with T1 becoming valid within 25km, and T2 within 250. Make the rest of it act like a cyno with RR disallowed. This takes care of the lock range shenanigans. [How much time did you spend thinking about this module? I'm trying to be nice but c'mon] Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30742	Posted - 2015.03.04 12:49:17 - [16] - Quote Make it fun. Give Recons a bonus to cycle time on these things. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30744	Posted - 2015.03.04 13:44:05 - [17] - Quote Ezwal, literally the only CCP person who you know has read the thread in its entirety so far. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30744	Posted - 2015.03.04 13:47:19 - [18] - Quote Your point? Oh hey, it's also my point. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30745	Posted - 2015.03.04 14:06:14 - [19] - Quote Bezdar22 wrote: lemme tell u whats gonna happen... there will be FW like fights in null sec.. no more big fights.. frig fights every where... what they dont understand ppl coe top play this game coz they heard of big fights.. thats what make story .. not small fights. small fights just look cool thats about it.. this game wil become WOW pretty soon.. thats where CCP leading us. EVE is already dependent on fantasy and magic imaginary physics so calm down. You're already playing WoW. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30748	Posted - 2015.03.04 15:35:35 - [20] - Quote Steve Ronuken wrote: I've had a couple of people asking why I haven't commented. so here's the reason, and comments: Reason: When it comes to Sov, I'm a completely outsider. I can comment on things like people saying 'Large battles are really dull to fight in' , but not so much on the day to day living in Sov. While I did comment on things as I saw them, everything was prefixed with "I don't live in null, so take with a dose of salt" Comments: The changes look (from an outsider perspective) promising. That they'll up the quantity of conflict in Null, and hopefully push towards a balkanized Eve. I see both of these as good. While huge coalitions are 'efficient', they're not 'fun'. And big battles may be good for marketing, but they're not so good for the players relegated to being F1 monkeys. I want to see changes with the industry index (and with mining in general, though that's a far bigger change than just changing what adjusts the indexes) but I don't see it as a blocking problem. Maybe it's that I'm a vet, but I thought the fun was in th[OH GOD THE BEES I'M ALLERGIC] Erasmus Grant wrote: There should be a thing on eve bet to see how long it will take this to reach a 100 pages Forum usage metrics show a threadnought rebalance is needed. In true CCP fashion, a posts-per-page increase to 100. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.

Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30748	Posted - 2015.03.04 15:43:57 - [21] - Quote It disturbs me to see the use of broad usage statistics to make balance decisions and also validate them. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30752	Posted - 2015.03.04 15:57:08 - [22] - Quote Renters are paying for the stability and protection. And like Arrendis said, there's an element of value at play. 10 billion ISK a month is worth different things to different people. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30752	Posted - 2015.03.04 16:01:44 - [23] - Quote epicurus ataraxia wrote: Arrendis wrote: Igor Nappi wrote: I find it hard to believe that 0.0 income is too low considering there's currently people who are willing to pay somebody else for the right to use 0.0 systems. There's low-income people in the US voting Republican, too - just because people do it doesn't mean they're smart to do so. All these are possible, but there is no substitute for independent hard, public, data. And if it exists, it certainly is not public. If it is shown to be disfunctional, then all areas of space should back you. It's mutually beneficial. Mutually symbiotic. Whatever. Large groups are employing themselves as protection-for-hire, and renters are employing themselves as industrialists or miners. The ownership of the space is switched from the irl arrangement of hired security, but that's the only difference, and it's required by the game mechanics for the relationship to exist. There are other groups who more closely resemble hired security, who don't own the space they fight in, but both arrangements operate under the same basic principle. It's incorrect to vilify sov-holding hired security over the other type. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30752	Posted - 2015.03.04 16:04:39 - [24] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: Rain6637 wrote: It disturbs me to see the use of broad usage statistics to make balance decisions and also validate them. I'm troubled by that too. Like the population one, i know I contributed to that because I moved 2 cyno alts into null so I could move loot with my Panther now that the Archon got nerfed (lol). More characters in null doesn't mean a healthier null, it means for some reason their are more characters there. It guarantees / means that balance decisions are out of touch. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30753	Posted - 2015.03.04 16:07:52 - [25] - Quote I'm wondering if removing the shooting requirement is supposed to synergize with future nerfs to drones, which are the only ammo-free / resource-free source of DPS in the game. Or this could just be a really bad move for making sov and ownership games require even less ammo and resources. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30753	Posted - 2015.03.04 16:40:24 - [26] - Quote Hey all, Fozzie hasn't denied on Twitter that the module doesn't apply at the end of cycle. That would explain why it seems to be possible to break lock and cycle through various means. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30753	Posted - 2015.03.04 16:53:30 - [27] - Quote Entosis for 10 minutes should undock everyone in station. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30755	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:35:59 - [28] - Quote I'm not sure lengthy explanations in this thread are likely, when it would be better to use them as material for FF. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30755	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:51:47 - [29] - Quote re-+crim-+i-+na-+tion r+Ö-îkrim+Ö-ên-üSH(+Ö)n/ noun an accusation in response to one from someone else. "there are no tears, no recriminations" synonyms: accusation(s), counteraccusation(s), countercharge(s), counterattack(s), retaliation(s) "this is not a time for recrimination, but a time to come together in solidarity" Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30755	Posted - 2015.03.04 17:53:36 - [30] - Quote Gorgof Intake wrote: None of which matters when your roster of capable FCs amounts to around half a dozen dudes- maybe a dozen if you stretch it out to incorporate pubbie shitlords. Can we all stop the phallic measurements and address the actual issues at hand? I'll have you know our list of incapable FCs is much, much longer! Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.

Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30757	Posted - 2015.03.04 20:09:19 - [31] - Quote Looking at the dev blog again, I'm sensing apologies for game design based on hardware load balancing? Spread everyone out over a constellation to reduce Tidi? Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30759	Posted - 2015.03.05 00:52:50 - [32] - Quote Ranamar wrote: Actually... can we get a clarification on whether the increase in Entosis cycle time on capitals increases the time it takes them to capture, or if it only increases the time it takes them to start capturing? I'm pretty sure it translates into a longer run-up time, but the same effect as subcapital Entosis after that. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30760	Posted - 2015.03.05 02:14:33 - [33] - Quote I'm scared. I need to make sure I remember to pay my membership dues on time. I almost got kicked last month. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30761	Posted - 2015.03.05 02:51:24 - [34] - Quote Fozzie, will effective tossing require corp roles? Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30761	Posted - 2015.03.05 02:54:24 - [35] - Quote ...trying to figure out if I can somehow mitigate my 200m ISK per character per month membership fee, as a tosser. Don't post on the forums, devs don't read it. Send GMs your questions with support tickets. Don't be silent.
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30761	Posted - 2015.03.05 08:36:19 - [36] - Quote If you want to hear Mittens speak about Sov and breaking down the enemy with exhaustive threats of invasion, find a recording of his EVE Vegas 2012 presentation. Then relate that to how easy it is to present a credible threat with this Entosis laser. Then come back and read what Aryth, Querns, Arrendis, and Gevlon have said in this thread. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30761	Posted - 2015.03.05 08:45:28 - [37] - Quote At this point I'm pretty sure the Entosis' stats are intentionally being presented in a broke OP state (by Fozzie) for the hype. I predict Entosis will be changed to require X number of Entosis minutes (or hours) which can be sped up with multiple Entosis lasers at once, from both sides. So basically the contest will be a rolling count of total Entosis minutes with the winner being the side with an X minute / hour lead. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30761	Posted - 2015.03.05 08:48:16 - [38] - Quote I love your name, btw Milla. Goodpussy. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30761	Posted - 2015.03.05 08:56:14 - [39] - Quote How to make it seem like you listen to feedback: Present a broken idea Let players rabble Do it the right way like you planned, and say it was due to feedback. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30762	Posted - 2015.03.05 09:07:30 - [40] - Quote You'd end up with an Australia that nobody touches. Help, I can't download EVE

Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30762	Posted - 2015.03.05 09:16:15 - [41] - Quote SilentAsTheGrave wrote: Rain6637 wrote: If you want to hear Mittens speak about Sov and breaking down the enemy with exhaustive threats of invasion, find a recording of his EVE Vegas 2012 presentation. Then relate that to how easy it is to present a credible threat with this Entosis laser. Then come back and read what Aryth, Alp Khan, Querns, Arrendis, and Gevlon have said in this thread. The fear mongering you guys keep doing is getting tiresome. m8 you're confused. That post has the most candor of any of my posts in this thread so far. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30763	Posted - 2015.03.05 09:35:15 - [42] - Quote Hey Dark Spite, I didn't mean for it to make anyone upset. I mentioned it for anyone interested in proof of how Entosis sov will be used by goons. The summary of Mittenz' talk was how to run sov warfare. So it is very relevant. He also mentions that Sov is EVE's best / only undeniable win condition. You can measure battles in ISK and ships, but the final flag that is planted is Sov. So. Sov has ISK benefits, but it's not about that, it's about planting that flag. The other interesting thing about his talk is the date. 2012. At the time, his example for griefing was fake-out cynos, for days on end. Light random cynos in the space you intend to invade, and bring nothing through it. They'll respond and get amped up initially, but over time it will just wear them down. Not sure if you're aware, but groups in EVE fall apart without so much as a shot fired, due to things like stress. In 2015, it won't be cynos, it will be Entosis modules. The tactics he discussed in that presentation work even better with Entosis sov. And then you have the people who have posted in this thread. They are warning everyone that Entosis sov will be bad. Gevlon included, and his comments can be taken as acknowledgement that it will be abused by you know who. Goon comments can be taken as gloating, or whatever you like. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30764	Posted - 2015.03.05 10:14:48 - [43] - Quote Kagura Nikon wrote: Rain6637 wrote: At this point I'm pretty sure the Entosis' stats are intentionally being presented in a broke OP state (by Fozzie) for the hype. I predict Entosis will be changed to require X number of Entosis minutes (or hours) which can be sped up with multiple Entosis lasers at once, from both sides. So basically the contest will be a rolling count of total Entosis minutes with the winner being the side with an X minute / hour lead. This is just like the time Rise said "PS: permadeath. PEACE!" at the end of EVE Vegas. For the hype. Something tells me he didn't want to do it, and was put up to it by someone managing, well, hype. So you fail at understanding the very BASICS of their proposal. The KEY thing is NOT ESCALATING WITH NUMBERS!! That is the Only reason why these proposals are interesting! because it will be more interesting to have several smaller fleeets than a HUGE BLOB on most of the war period. Because a small group can disable a system from a much larger alliance even with 10-20 ships if the owning alliance has no one living on that system. Because it will be the same speed for the average joe league to take a system as it would be for CFC do the same. People whined so much about force projection, but they always failed to study proper strategy and notice that the problem is force CONCENTRATION! Force projection is just a mean to achieve force concentration! The lack of a limit or diminishing return in force CONCENTRATION is the root of all evil in 0.0 It makes the war in eve closer to strategic level of real world wars and with more depth. It does not amtter if you had the whole damm red army or just a regiment of 1k soldiers. Takes exactly the same time to take a village of grape farmers in south of France with either force! Because you cannot make such massive force concentration! I don't think it should require escalation with numbers either. But it is obvious the Entosis system is designed to be a contest of military power, and only ends until one side is depleted. So while one Entosis appears to promote anti-blob gameplay, the reality is Entosis contests require annihilation or the nonexistence of one side. If you raise the total Entosis minute requirement, you remove the viability of one Entosis laser as a credible threat. Right now, a credible threat looks like a group with enough DPS to have its way with your station in 10 minutes. With Entosis sov, a credible threat is reduced to just one dude. And that's a mistake because the station part of it is basically a ball tap to see if anyone's home. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30764	Posted - 2015.03.05 10:19:27 - [44] - Quote Gevlon will lobby against anything that benefits CFC, and that's what he's doing with his comments in this thread. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30765	Posted - 2015.03.05 10:35:22 - [45] - Quote You're missing the troll of the trollceptor. The troll isn't the ceptor, it's the article. Look at what it did to this thread. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30765	Posted - 2015.03.05 11:45:30 - [46] - Quote got bored. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30766	Posted - 2015.03.05 12:47:43 - [47] - Quote War Kitten wrote: Javajunky wrote: I'm going to say I'm somewhat disappointed, but I shall return to comment after I go throw up. Not that it particularly matters after looking at your meager post history involving a whinge about mining nerfs and the ISBoxer nerf, but I notice you never did come back to comment after your dramatic "first" post. Whether this is intentional or not it's funny either way. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30766	Posted - 2015.03.05 12:51:55 - [48] - Quote Zappity wrote: The warp disruption needs to stay on regardless of whether you lose targeting, should stop cloaking and should not be able to be deactivated by overheating. It would be tragic if null was inflicted with anything like FW stabbed and cloaky farmers. No it wouldn't. FW would finally get their ships with bonuses to core stabs Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30766	Posted - 2015.03.05 13:06:56 - [49] - Quote Aralyn Cormallen wrote: I suspect this thread has ceased its usefulness now, all the significant points have been raised; until we get the "issue" devblogs, going back and forth is kinda pointless. The thread has pretty-much devolved to highseccers who will never take advantage of the changes crowing about "the fall of the blocks", big blockmembers either, depending on your viewpoint, giving the benefit of their experience and explaining how they'll break this system, or "crying", and wormhole and NPC-nullsec small gangers looking forward to giving a black eye or two over old bitter grudges. Commence the next 100 pages without a new viewpoint being expressed Nonsense, we haven't even started on how bad the name is Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30766	Posted - 2015.03.05 13:31:47 - [50] - Quote Just one? Help, I can't download EVE

Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30771	Posted - 2015.03.05 21:23:17 - [51] - Quote Confirming blue backstabbing is the most explicitly defined cardinal sin. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30774	Posted - 2015.03.06 15:07:48 - [52] - Quote For only 5 ISK a day, you can help sponsor Special Eddie. Eddie was diagnosed with Entosis at the age of five, after his parents noticed they were unable to hold his attention for more than 5 minutes at a time. Initially, from two months of age, his parents suspected that Eddie suffered from ADHD or Asperger's Syndrome, but Ritalin did nothing to improve his condition. He is currently fifteen years old and suffers from late-stage Entosis, characterized by sporadic responsiveness, usually within a four-hour window each evening. Eddie requires occasional laser treatment to restore his basic bodily functions. Eddie also requires dialysis. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30780	Posted - 2015.03.07 00:10:44 - [53] - Quote 250 km is the hard limit for ship lock ranges, might even be 245, I don't remember. Caps included. 250 km is just a figure that means 'within all possible lock range.' Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30781	Posted - 2015.03.07 00:18:51 - [54] - Quote How likely are vulnerability windows tied to server reinforcement, and in part, an effort to mitigate TiDi. If that's a significant factor in making everyone commit to a time window, arguments against are rather futile. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30784	Posted - 2015.03.07 06:01:50 - [55] - Quote Ooh your forum skills are exquisite. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30785	Posted - 2015.03.07 06:12:15 - [56] - Quote I disagreed with the Aussies who framed their questions about TZ isolation so negatively. True, there's the awkwardness of being outside every other TZ, but there's also the benefit of being outside every other TZ. They're also geographically offset from the rest of the world, playing a game that has worldwide participation. Entosis sov is attempting to be fair to everyone, so the offset will be there unless some concessions are made just for Aussies. The Aussies' questions in the EVE Down Under interview were defeatist, meaning they focused on what they would lose, rather than what they'd gain. Another thing that makes me question their logic was the reaction to Fozzie's mention of why AFK cloaky is not a problem in wormholes. He was only implying that local is double-edged, but it seemed at least a couple of those in attendance jumped to the conclusion that local is going away. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30786	Posted - 2015.03.07 07:18:13 - [57] - Quote I don't know what you mean, exactly. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30787	Posted - 2015.03.07 07:37:13 - [58] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: Well actually it wouldn't work unless they formed into an alliance of their own to hold the sov and set the timers so sigh CFCAUTZAlliance just doesn't have the right ring to it Ah, ok I see what you mean. I still think everyone has a role, and some of us are in a better position to do certain things than others. I have a hard time feeling sorry for anyone when it comes to ratting income or playing for free (or playing with an ISK motive), because I don't. I pay irl money for subs, scramble for stratop pings with my Ishtars, which are the only ships I have my characters fit with, aside from an unfit, unrigged Thanatos to haul those Ishtars around while I scout. Maybe it's a veteran thing. I'm here for the gangbangs and ISK has nothing to do with it. There's also the assumption that every TZ behaves the same way by time of day, which I flat out disagree with. I stay up at all hours of the day, and it's not uncommon for me to be awake at downtime. I'm in Los Angeles, and EU is 8h ahead of me, but I still find myself playing in EU prime time. By time of day, AU is six hours behind me. Sure, there's a calendar date difference, but 11:30 PM for me (right now) is 6:30 PM in Sydney. Everyone has to extend themselves sometimes. The other assumption is that it's healthy for a group to be exclusively one TZ. It helps to have friends. We have to help each other out. I don't mean to hurt anyone's feelings, but lastly, if I was offset from everyone in the world (If that is true, I mean), then wouldn't it be easier to rat? I don't know. I don't rat and I'm normally damn near broke and I don't care. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30787	Posted - 2015.03.07 07:53:20 - [59] - Quote As long as they can be assed to send one guy out in a ceptor to laze their **** back on, we're good right? Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30789	Posted - 2015.03.07 19:12:42 - [60] - Quote There's no need to be fancy and say Osmon for level 4s. The common / popular CN variety yield a bil a week for just a few hours a day. Point being that's one account in high sec supporting five accounts via PLEX. Help, I can't download EVE

Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30789	Posted - 2015.03.07 20:07:13 - [61] - Quote All for the good of many Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30789	Posted - 2015.03.07 21:21:08 - [62] - Quote That pro synergy guy thinks he's clever by posting a dated screenshot of SRP figures, but all he's doing is making players in scrubby orgs jealous. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30789	Posted - 2015.03.07 21:33:39 - [63] - Quote On the contrary, there's a reason why we've made claims about the ISK barely supporting our ops. Obviously. Because we're not just sitting and stuffing it in our coffers. This isn't one of those lowsec l337 hotdrop groups who don't know how to support their people. No one cares about your leaked SRP. I just told you, it's basically good propaganda. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 21:39:49 - [64] - Quote oooh nice burn. PS, post with your main. And while we're posting intel screenshots here's one of mine. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 21:50:12 - [65] - Quote gladly. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 22:09:37 - [66] - Quote I maximized it for that screenshot, so you could see the avatars as more proof those aren't copy pasted screenshots. You think you're the only one with alts? I've made 200 million ISK in the time you started getting chatty today. Ask me how I know high sec AFK ISK is so good. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 22:15:16 - [67] - Quote No idea what grindr is, m8. What is it. oh. lol ok thanks for that. Earlier I said I pulled in 200 mil, I was mistaken, it is 250 mil. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 22:26:56 - [68] - Quote Yeah, we should be back on track any minute now... wait for it... Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 23:18:54 - [69] - Quote Chyeah, and losing sov makes the whole tower or towers explode, or is it something more complicated that CCP would totally get around to implementing. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 23:32:45 - [70] - Quote Ok, Mike. Help, I can't download EVE

Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 23:49:31 - [71] - Quote Those ihubs can be grief popped every couple weeks. You want moon mining thrown in the same pot? Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.07 23:56:34 - [72] - Quote davet517 wrote: Rain6637 wrote: Those ihubs can be grief popped every couple weeks. You want moon mining thrown in the same pot? Yep. You want the constant stream of passive income? Deal with the "grief poppers". In other words, play the damn game. m8 Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.08 00:13:50 - [73] - Quote Naw, online too. Help, I can't download EVE
Rain6637 GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 30790	Posted - 2015.03.08 00:30:44 - [74] - Quote This thread sucks Help, I can't download EVE

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.